Custom.pll to set block to read only

Hi all,
I want to use custom.pll to make the item revisions
form read-only for certain responsibilities in 11.5.9.
What is the best property to set to accomplish this?
Alterable_plus looks like a good candidate...
Thanks,
Scott

Actually, it looks like alterable_plus works at the item level - is there a property I can set for the block?
Thanks,
Scott

Similar Messages

SQL Query (Updateable Report) conditionally set a column read-only with lov

Hi
I'm attempting to set a column that has a select list lov read-only if there is existing data in the column otherwise permit the end-user to enter a value using the select list.
I've looked at Re: A better method of handling tabular forms with variable column type? and using this code as an example it almost works, except the select list lov button is still active and therefore the data can be changed. How does one conditionally disable the select list lov button in Javascript?
TIA

In the JS code where you make the field readonly, add another line to hide the lov opener link ( in jQuery it would be *$('<selector>').hide()* ).
If you can provide the HTML code from your page for such a column (the JS code would depend on the template/theme), I can try helping.

Set Mobile me read only ical

I would like others to be able to log into my ical through mobile me as read-only and not have any access at all to the other applications such as contacts idisk, email, etc.
Is there as way to set MobileMe for this type of usage?
Bryan
< Edited by Host >

you can do that by calling class method CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>FILE_SET_ATTRIBUTES exporting parameter READONLY
note: this will work only in the foreground, it is not possible to do it in a background job

Batch renaming setting xmp to read-only

Doing some batch renaming of audio files and it seems like randomly xmps are being set to read-only, losing the previous filename preservation in the process.
Purging the cache for the folder seems to reset the xmp back from read-only, but i dont know
why it is happening.

Hi Felco,
In the method IF_CRM_BSP_MODEL_ACCESS_IL~READ of the class associated with your structure(MAC) you have a parameter ET_FIELD_ATTRIBUTE in this you can mark the fields with this properties:
A     Not Changeable
B     Not Relevant
C     Mandatory Field
Regards.
Manuel

Lion administrator setting changed to read only for file sharing. Now hung machine

I was trying to network my Mac with a WIndows 7 machine and tried to have my name in the file sharing read write instead of other users such as administrator when I changed the administrator to read only for file sharing rights and could not add my name as a file sharing user with read write permissions Really silly move
I have performed a repair of disk permissions however still hung.
Whats worse is that my time machine for the last three days has been disconnecting when backing up leaving a partially complete backup. Backup failed. I also left a apple support community message a few days ago to solve it.
So its critical
Timely HELP is needed.

This same problem happened to me, all the sudden one day my mac decided to revert to the original standard root username and password which I obviously did not know. In order to change this:
1) Activate single user mode on reboot as by pressing cmd + s as your computer starts up. Make sure you do it right away, and keep the keys pressed down.
2) Where the cursor pops up, type exactly
+/sbin/mount - uw/+
3) When the next cursor pops up type exactly
passwd
4) Then you can type any password you want (now changing the root password to be what you want)
Note you will not be able to see what you type, but the text is being recognized
5)The computer asks for you to retype the password, retype it
6) Type reboot
Once the computer restarts you can navigate to system preferences>accounts> and then unlock the account (lock is located on the bottom left corner) using Username: root and the password you just set. Henceforth, you can appoint your account as the administrator. Hope it works!

Set word file read only after exporting through mail merge

Hello,
I am exporting the ALV report to word file using standard functionality using mail merge.
But my requirement is after exporting to word ,file should be protected or read only.
Plz Help me to solve this issue.
Thanks,
Paresh.

you can do that by calling class method CL_GUI_FRONTEND_SERVICES=>FILE_SET_ATTRIBUTES exporting parameter READONLY
note: this will work only in the foreground, it is not possible to do it in a background job

Set fields to read-only after addInstance()

I have this function on my form "add row" which allows user to create a new row to fill in additional fields; when user click submit, the fields of the form will become read-only.
however after i add another new row into the form, when i click submit that row does not change into read-only.
this is the code for my add row: Table1.Row1.instanceManager.addInstance();
and this is the code for my submit button, whereby upon clicking the field becomes read-only
-----Test.#subform[0].Subform2[1].buttonForm.Submit::click - (JavaScript, client) -----------
Test.Subform1.IsSubmitted.rawValue = "1"; //submitted ----0 is default
Test.Subform2.Payee.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Name.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.GST.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Amount_GST.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Currency.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Invoice_Date.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Invoice_No.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Company_Code.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Tax_Code.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Payment_Method.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.House_Bank.access = "protected";
Test.Subform2.Description.access = "protected";
Confirm.presence="visible";
Edit.presence="visible";
Submit.presence="invisible";
Add.presence="invisible";
Table1.Row1.GL_Account.access = "protected";
Table1.Row1.DC.access = "protected";
Table1.Row1.GL_Description.access = "protected";
Table1.Row1.Amount_exclgst.access = "protected";
Table1.Row1.Tax_Code.access = "protected";
Table1.Row1.Fund_Center.access = "protected";
Table1.Row1.Cost_Center.access = "protected";
Table1.Row1.Button1.access="protected";
Test.Subform1.StaticText1.presence="invisible";
Test.Subform1.Summary.presence="visible";

Hello,
Perhaps you could create a trigger for that table that prevents update, delete and even insert of rows before a specified timestamp.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER <Triggername>
BEFORE INSERT OR DELETE OR UPDATE ON <Table>
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF <RowDate> < <sysdate - <days>> THEN
Raise_application_error(-20001, 'ROW is in read only range.'
END;
null

Set .jpg as read only OK?

Whilst I shoot raw with my SLR's, the 'toy' compact only shoots jpgs
I'm fed up with them changing all the time when I add key wordwords, develops, etc.
Sadly, LR can't create XMP's, so I'm thinking of making all my jpg's Read Only.
Obviously this will mean that external programs won't see the keywords, which is not an issue, but will LR be happy to write everything to the DB and ignore writing to the jpg, or will it have an issue?
Ta,
Mike.

Mike,
DramaticFoto wrote:
Obviously this will mean that external programs won't see the keywords, which is not an issue, but will LR be happy to write everything to the DB and ignore writing to the jpg, or will it have an issue?
Why ask us when you could just try it?
Also, you could turn off "Automatically write changes into XMP" in your Catalog Settings. That would also stop it for your raw files, but that could possibly be OK. You could always do it manually for your raws if you prefer.
Hal

Set up a read only group on the config.xml file through Admin console

I would like to set up a group which can use Admin console
(http://ip:7001/console).
However, this group cannot deploy, modify anything on the configuration. In
the document, I can add ACL lists. But how? The table of permission
function on the document is not clear. For example, there is no READ and
WRITE on the table in the Admin Server guide. Please help.
If I have guest enable on the Admin console. What is the user name and
password of a gest to use the Admin console?
Thanks for help.

Do you want to expose the Admin app on the same network as the managed app?
If not, just hide (black hole) the IP/port to the admin server.
If I have guest enable on the Admin console. What is the user name and
password of a gest to use the Admin console?I don't think guest has a password. Allowing guest means non-auth'd users
can access it.
Peace,
Cameron Purdy
Tangosol, Inc.
Clustering Weblogic? You're either using Coherence, or you should be!
Download a Tangosol Coherence eval today at http://www.tangosol.com/
"SLC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3c5dcd78$[email protected]..
I would like to set up a group which can use Admin console
(http://ip:7001/console).
However, this group cannot deploy, modify anything on the configuration.In
the document, I can add ACL lists. But how? The table of permission
function on the document is not clear. For example, there is no READ and
WRITE on the table in the Admin Server guide. Please help.
If I have guest enable on the Admin console. What is the user name and
password of a gest to use the Admin console?
Thanks for help.

Set a record read only

hi everyone,
i would like to know if is it possible to desable any update (or delete) from a specific record, if a flag is on? Let's say that this record reflect an old situation and must not be changed
Thanks

Hi,
This may be the code....
create or replace trigger a on table_t before Insert or update
begin
Raise_Application_Error(-200001,'Soory Your are not allowed to Entter...');
end;Regards,
Ganesh R

Changing sales employee on document set to read only

*Our customer has invoices set to read only for certain users. however they need these users to be able to change just one field - sales employee.*
*Is there anyway this can be achieved??
Edited by: Samantha Glanville on Oct 8, 2009 3:25 PM

If it set up as read only, there is no room for updating even only one field. Better leave this to other more powerful user to change. Otherwise, the read only setting would be overridden.
Thanks,
Gordon

SelectBooleanCheckbox read-only after setting selection

Hello!
I'm trying to set the selection of an adf selectBooleanCheckbox!
When I set it by the pull-down menu (true, false) in the Property Inspector, everything is ok!
But when I set the selection depending on an ADF binding, the value is set correct,
but the checkbox is read-only and a change of the selection is impossible!
Here's the very simpel code of the Box:
<af:selectBooleanCheckbox
label="myLabel"
value="#{bindings.SomeValue.inputValue != null}"/>
Can anyone help me, how to enable the checkbox for selection?
Thank you very much!
Sebastian
PS: I'm using JDeveloper 10.1.3.3!

hi..
the previous error is ok now..
below is the script, the status is when click on 'Add new row' button, it will pass status = 'ADD_ROW' and set the startdate read only = False.
my question now is...
e.g i've a multiple rows (can display up to 10 rows) display in table form in the page....i query 3 rows of records, then i click 'Add new row' button,
how to make sure the 3 rows queried early is having startdate read only = Yes and for the new row startdate read only = False?
with the below codes it will set all rows startdate read only = False (including those queried data)... pls help...
public void setReadonly(String status)
OAViewObjectImpl vo = (OAViewObjectImpl)findViewObject("SeaoeAutoMosPVO1");
OARow row = (OARow)vo.first();
OAViewObject SeaoeAutoMosSummaryVO = (OAViewObject)findViewObject("SeaoeAutoMosSummaryVO1");
OARow SeaoeAutoMosSummaryRow = (OARow)SeaoeAutoMosSummaryVO.getCurrentRow();
if (status=="ADD_ROW")
row.setAttribute("StartDateRender", Boolean.FALSE);
else
row.setAttribute("StartDateRender", Boolean.TRUE);
}

Globally setting read-only classes

Is there any way to globally set all 1-1 mappings to
read-only AND have them write out the columns(s) on the
object they represent. I would like to do this without
having an additional direct to field mapping for the column.
I am trying to not have to programmically set readonly classes for objects.
Thanks

Not sure I follow what you mean by "write out the column(s)" -- I assume you mean as a step in logging?
You can get the descriptors from a Session (or Project if you use the old way of creating sessions and want to do this before login) by saying "getDescriptors()". You get a hashtable key=class and value=Descriptor. Then you can get the mappings from the descriptor and pretty much do whatever you want (i.e., check for mappings that are 1-1 and set them to read only, get the columns they map to, etc). Check the Javadoc on Descriptor for more info.
- Don

Is there a way to create a "read only" inbox in mac mail?

I am wondering if there is a way to set up a read only inbox...I would like to receive email from a specific address but block or not have the option to send from that address.

Thanks! I was able to get to the sqlite prompt, but at that prompt I must not be copying/pasting correctly. Here is what I'm getting if you can correct me, perhaps I need to type it in differently? Thanks
Last login: Tue Jun 10 14:04:28 on console
Macintosh-3:~ ryanr$ sqlite3 ~/Library/Application\ Support/AddressBook/MailRecents-v4.abcdmr
SQLite version 3.7.13 2012-07-17 17:46:21
Enter ".help" for instructions
Enter SQL statements terminated with a ";"
sqlite> .mode csv
sqlite> SELECT zfirstnamenormalized, zlastnamenormalized, zemailnormalized FROM zabcdmailrecent;
sqlite>
sqlite> .mode csv SELECT zfirstnamenormalized, zlastnamenormalized, zemailnormalized FROM zabcdmailrecent;
Error: unknown command or invalid arguments: "mode". Enter ".help" for help
sqlite> .mode csv
sqlite> SELECT zfirstnamenormalized, zlastnamenormalized, zemailnormalized FROM zabcdmailrecent;
sqlite>

Best practice for read-only functionality

Hi,
I'm part of the development team of a system with about 100 screens. The customer would like us to add some read-only functionality to the system, so that certain users are able to access the screens but not change any of the data on them. We already have policies in place on the database level that keeps read-only users from saving data, but it's not very user friendly to allow users to change data on a screen, only to tell them that they're not allowed to save those changes once they try to do so. It would clearly be better if all components are rendered as read-only components for read-only users, making them unable to make any data changes in the first place.
User privileges in the system are controlled by roles defined and set in the system (not ADF roles or Weblogic roles). At any given time and place, it's possible to check whether the current user has a certain role. We already use this in a number of places to make it possible to control which user has access to which screens. In a few places we even control which functionality should be enabled for the current user within a screen, but mostly the access control is currently on the screen level. With read-only users getting access to all screens, it seems we will need lot of extra in-screen access control to keep these users from changing anything.
But what's the best practice here? One way to go would be to add some logic to every single active component on every single screen, to determine whether it should be rendered as active or disabled/read-only. But that would require a lot of extra coding.
So my question is: Is there a smarter way to do this? Maybe something done through skinning? Or something else?
(I'm not sure how relevant this is for this sort of question, but we're currently using JDev 11.1.1.4.0, and expect to upgrade to 11.1.1.6.0 within the next 6 months)
Best regards,
Andreas

Hi Guna, Puthanampatti and Don,
Thanks a lot for your replies. I'm currently looking into implementing something along the lines of what Guna has suggested:
Our application consists of a number of individual work spaces that are deployed as adflibs which have all been added to a "master application work space", and the master application is deployed as an .ear file. Most of the individual work spaces are for all the different functional areas of the application, with their own task flows, page fragments etc. The rest are work spaces with common functionality, like datamodel (entity definitions), utility methods, page templates, and framework extensions. In the latter, we have defined custom classes for all the base classes (somewhat similar to what Don describes, I believe).
In our custom class for ViewRowImpl, I have added an isAttributeUpdateable method, and in our custom class for ApplicationModuleImpl I have added an isReadOnlyUser method. The isAttributeUpdateable method uses the isReadOnlyUser method to determine if the current user is a read-only user or not; if the user is a read-only user the isAttributeUpdateable method will return false, otherwise true. The isReadOnlyUser method in our base class is just a dummy method that always returns true. But in the ApplicationModuleImpl classes of our individual work spaces, i've written an override for isReadOnlyUser, giving the answer that is relevant for the work space in question (for instance, whether or not the current user has the role "User Administrator").
That pretty much takes care of all input fields in tables and forms, which is a big step in the right direction. This still leaves some work to be done for components that are not directly linked to view object attributes (like buttons), but I guess that can't be helped. Also, there are a few of the work spaces that contain a number of pages that are related to different user privileges (as in: page 1 requires user privilege A, and page 2 requires user privilege B); in these cases I will have to do something different than just writing an override in the "local" ApplicationModuleImpl class.
@Don: What you describe seems to be pretty close in functionality to what we already have, though your implementation is different from ours. You have used your custom base ApplicationModuleImpl class to keep read-only users from committing changes. We use Virtual Private Database and database policies to the same end: If a user without the required full-access role tries to commit data it will cause a database error, which we then handle in the application (so the user gets a message like "You don't have the required privileges to changes this data", rather than an ORA message). Unfortunately, our customers are not content with this. They want a solution where all input fields and most of the buttons etc. are disabled for read-only users, and that's why I'm looking into the best/smartest way to do this.
@Puthanampatti: We already use something similar to what you're suggesting. The challenge I'm currently facing is how best to disable/enable components based on the current user's roles, not how to determine and store those roles.
Best regards,
Andreas

Custom.pll to set block to read only

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for