Customer Master zone Customer Transportation Zone Is Greyed

Dear Friends
I want to make customer master transportation zone field to be optional entry.I did necessary changes in OBD2,OB20 and OVT0.After making optional entry in all area it is been with grey mode that is not editable.But if I change as required entry then it is changed as required field that is editable mode.But I need only optional entry.Can any one help me on this...
Regards
Ganesh
Posting in all CAPs or BOLD, represents shouting, kindly avoid this in your future post.
Message was edited by Moderator: Jyoti Prakash

I did necessary changes in OBD2,OB20 and OVT0
In OB20, which one you have selected and through which tcode you were checking?
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

F4 help for Customizing Transport Request Field....

Hi,
I need a Function Module for F4 help for Customizing Transport Request field. I have used the below FM but I ma able to get only Customizing TR for only Login User Name only but not other Users. How to get the Customizing TR which are created by other Users(Owner is diferent from Login Owner).
PARAMETERS: p_cts TYPE e070-trkorr OBLIGATORY.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR p_cts.
PERFORM get_cts CHANGING p_cts.
*&      Form get_cts
FORM get_cts CHANGING p_cts.
TYPE-POOLS trwbo.
DATA: lv_cts TYPE trwbo_request_header.
To Get only custimzing requests
CALL FUNCTION 'TR_REQUEST_CHOICE'
    EXPORTING
      iv_request_types     = 'W'
    IMPORTING
      es_request           = lv_cts
    EXCEPTIONS
      invalid_request      = 1
      invalid_request_type = 2
      user_not_owner       = 3
      no_objects_appended = 4
      enqueue_error        = 5
      cancelled_by_user    = 6
      recursive_call       = 7
      OTHERS               = 8.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    CALL FUNCTION 'POPUP_DISPLAY_MESSAGE'
      EXPORTING
        titel = 'Transport'
        msgid = sy-msgid
        msgty = sy-msgty
        msgno = sy-msgno
        msgv1 = sy-msgv1
        msgv2 = sy-msgv2
        msgv3 = sy-msgv3
        msgv4 = sy-msgv4.
ENDIF.
Pass the selected TR to selection screen
IF sy-subrc = 0.
    MOVE lv_cts-trkorr TO p_cts.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    " get_cts
Regards,
Deepthi.

Instead of using FM 'TR_REQUEST_CHOICE', you can have direct database select on table E070 and E071.
In E070, the field TRFUNCTION determine the customizing and workbench request.
K->     Workbench Request
W->     Customizing Request

Suddenly, my CS6 Illustrator and InDesign programs won't let me choose a custom size - it's greyed out. Can anyone help?

Suddenly my CS6 Illustrator and InDesign programs won't allow me to choose a custom size - it's greyed out. Any suggestions?

Sorry, but you've posted in the Adobe Audition forum...we specialise in audio here!

Have lost the canvas and the custom layout option is greyed out (no longer possible to click on).

how can we re-trieve?
have tried to re-open and customise but keep getting the above.
using FCP 7.0.3

iditinjersualem wrote:
how can we re-trieve?
Have you closed the Canvas? Have you gone to the menu Window > Canvas to toggle it on?
If so and it has not appeared, have you moved the Canvas so that it is hidden, or mostly off screen? Type Control - U to reposition all windows in their standard position.
Is the timeline missing as well? If so go to the menu File > New > Sequence and create a new sequence. Does it reappear then?
If all this does not help, then your preferences may have become corrupt and you many need to trash them. Go to:
http://www.digitalrebellion.com/prefman/
and download Prefernce Manager (free) to reset your preferences.
iditinjersualem wrote:
have tried to re-open and customise but keep getting the above.
The Custom layouts will appear greyed out until you create one first. From the FCP manual:
More info at:
http://documentation.apple.com/en/finalcutpro/usermanual/index.html#chapter=10%2 6section=3%26tasks=true
Again, if you are following this procedure and it is not working, try trashing your preferences.
MtD

Sequence of Customizing transports

Hi Community,
I have a question on transports that has been boggling my mind and I haven't found a satisfactory response as yet online.
Here is the scenario: Customizing TR 1 - Contains say plants
Customizing TR2 - Contains say storage locations
Customizing TR3 - Assign storage location to plant.
So basically, what I am saying is TR3 is dependent on TR1 and TR2.
Now for customizing transports does the sequence of transport matter? Basically, say I move TR3 followed by TR2 and TR1, but I make sure I move all. In that case will the transports fail? When we import customizing TRs, does the foreign key checks run in the importing system?
I was under the assumption that for customizing TRs, sequence doesn't matter. What matters is we move all that make a logical group? Can any of the ABAP experts here help on this? Thanks!!

Here is how I see it:
1. I can feed in any kind of data in a database table using an ABAP program's 'Update' statement. Hence, I could override any constraint/foreign key check that I would have imposed in SE11.
2. Similarly, if I release a TR, considering the update in the importing system would happen via an ABAP program, my take is the data would get written to the database. However, if we don't move all the TRs, it would lead to an inconsistent customizing, as we had predecessor nodes. For ex, if I just move TR3, what I am saying is, the import would be successful. However, if you open the node in customzing, the view might show error - saying invalid plant or invalid storage location but the TR import as such wont fail.
Hence, the sequence is not important. What is important is we move the complete logical set. The order would not matter. Is this a correct analysis? Any views?

Custom Transport Protocol in OSB

Hi,
How custom transport protocol can be created in OSB? can any one guide me on this?
Regards,
Amik

Hi BLowery
I looked through our internal servers and was not able to find any examples for J1939 for LabWindows CVI. As you mention, you can still use the XNET functions to build up your code from there. If you have the chance to open the VIs see the code in the J1939 Transport Protocol Reference Example, this could be a good start point for building up your code on CVI.
Hopefully, if someone has worked in this before, the might be able to provide suggestions or share their resources with you in this forum.
WenR

About Customizing transport request..

Hi ,
I created a customizing transport request , but I cannot add objects. It is showing "You cannot use the request. It has a wrong type". Help me , how to use Customizing request.
Regards
ASADUZZAMAN

HiASADUZZAMAN
You cannot use the request. It has a wrong type
Is above error a warning or error?
Double click on above information when you are getting you may get more inputs to analyze.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagendra.

Customizing transports

We run 4.6C on iSeries. Recently we upgraded the OS to V6R1. Development and test systems are on one server. Production has its own server. After the OS upgrade customizing transports are not applied to production. The transport log shows all is well but the changes are not on production system. I have to run $SYNC to apply the changes to production system. Workbench transports do not have this problem. Has anyone experienced this issue after OS upgrade to v6r1?
I appreciate your suggestions.
Berhanu

Hi Berhanu,
then I would assume - which I cannot believe - that the buffer sync is "dead" ... it happens all 2 minutes and if the timestamp is rubbish, this would be an option - have seen this once only ...
Then I can only suggest an OSS ticket, if it is reproducible and the parameter is correct ...
... still cannot believe that ...
Regards
Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag
http://www.consolut.com http://www.4soi.de http://www.easymarketplace.de

What is customizing transport?

what is customizing transport
Title was edited by:
Alvaro Tejada Galindo

To guarantee the consistency of Customizing entries in the source system and in the target system, special processing is required for transportable objects.
When processing in the source system, special entries are made for the transport in addition to the normal versions. These transport versions only contain the changed status for the object, similar to pending processing.
When transporting to the target system, only these specific transport entries are taken into account. In the target system, the changes are inserted into Customizing objects in the same way as when you release a pending object.
Details on Transporting Customizing Entries Using a Transport Application

Failed ABAP Transports metric has grey status

Dear colleagues,
in System monitoring I found Failed ABAP Transports metric has grey status. Then I checked Data Collection Status and found:
Log for mainextractor E2E_DPC_PULL_CORE has 14 warning(s) for the last 180
minutes.
In log I found:
Metric
005056B62E9D1ED1A7D246512DA45A0D/506A27FD986B4161E1008000AC100BB8 - Status: Data
Provider E2E_CONFIG_VAL : E2E_CONFIG_VAL: ABAP_TRANSPORTS;16.04.2014 05:03:45
-16.04.2014 06:04
Thenh I tried to use E2E_DPC_GET_DATA_CHECK
and found
Could you please help me to resolve this issue?
Thanks a lot ,
Alexander

Hello Aleksandr,
Please chek following notes according to your Solman version:
1975717 - ST710, SP10,11 System Monitoring 'Failed ABAP Transports' gray status
1792776 - ST710, SP06 System Monitoring 'Failed ABAP Transports'
BR,
K.

Urgent - Customizing transport order not present in transDIR

Hello Gurus
We have an issue with tranport Order for a customizing project . After a system
migration the development team started to work on the DEV server without TMS and transport routes to QUA configured . Tasks and Request were by mistake released then as Local change request in DEV . Now the TMS has been configured , but the tasks can not be exported in the /cofiles /datas directories to be imported in QUA .
Is it possible somehow to reassign the scope of the Released Change request to transportable or regenerate the task in order to transport it to QUA, as the whole customizing represent more 1 week of work !
Thanks a lot for your help .

Thanks for your fast answer
I was able to reassign the Object to a new transportable request one in SE01
Menu -> Object list -> include object .
I will instruct the customer to do so and keep you posted .
What is the difference with the copy tranpost request option ?
Many thanks to both of you .
Best regards .
Lionel

Customizing Transport Request Assignment process to Local Objects

Hi,
I am developing custom report, which will find out all dependent and local objects for given transport request. When we select the local objects and save, it has to show standard saving process screens...like package and TR screens.
I am trying the above problem using 'TRINT_TADIR_POPUP', 'TRINT_ORDER_CHOICE' and 'TRINT_APPEND_TO_COMM_ARRAYS' function module, but this function module 'TRINT_APPEND_TO_COMM_ARRAYS' giving exception ob_check_obj_error.
So, please let me know anyone have solution for assigning local objects to package and TR through customization (Programmatically).
Thanks,
Param..:-)

Hi Sheetal,
Thanks for the reply.
For this function module ADD_TO_PACKAGE, I can't import package name or Transport Request.
I need to have a save screen's, which generally we get during saving of any R/3 Object.
Thanks,
Param...:-)

Check STMS Customizing Transport request for equal entries

Hi
We use the BADI "CTS_REQUEST_CHECK" for some precheck before create and / or release customizing TA to inform the user that someone else is using the same customizing object in transport xy.
Following scenario:
Transport request 4711 is created 20.01.10 contains object "A" and released for testing in integrationsystem
Transport request 4715 is created 10.04.10 contains object "A" and released for testing in integrationsystem
When importing transport 4715 into productivsystem with STMS single transport there should be an error message that it's not allowed until transport 4711 is in productivsystem.
Which BADI or Userexit could help me?
Thanks in advance
Michael

Hi Diego,
Thanks for your reply.
I tranported the 'Default values for tax codes', are we suppose to do any pre/post activity to tranport this request.
@Ravi: As you suggested i compared the transported before and after transport in our Dev and QA server. there is no mismatch.
Many Thanks,
Shanthosh

Customizing Transport Error

Dear Experts,
I have a Customizing Table and a Text Table. I have a Customzing Maintenance View created for it.
I changed the values in my DEV System from :
1 a
2 b
3 c
to (New Values)
1 x..change in text
2 y..change in text
deleted the third one..
Already earlier the previous values do exist in TST System.
1 a
2 b
3 c
now i take a customzing request for the new values..and Transport but the value looks as below in TST.
1 x...updated good
2 y ..updated good
3 c..should not be there since i have deleted the third one and Transported but yet there in TST.
I have tried regenerating the Table Maintenance and Transporting the regenerated View in Workbench..
yet no results...
Please help me and guide me if i have to do anything more..
Thanks to all the SDN Users in advance:
Kiranmai

Refer [link1|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm32/helpdata/en/67/86b298415811d1893d0000e8323c4f/content.htm] and [Link2|http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&q=creatingatransportrequestmanuallyfortable+entries&meta=&aq=f&oq=]
[Removing table entry|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm32/helpdata/en/67/86b28b415811d1893d0000e8323c4f/content.htm]

Define Custom Shape Option is Greyed out

I'd appreciate any help that could be provided, I have not been able to define custom shapes in CS6. I'm using the pen tool in shape mode, I've used the path selection tool and switched between the path operations. I've made sure that the shape is selected in the paths work bar. Nothing seems to open up the define custom shape option. Is there a setting I'm neglecting to check? Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

I just tried deleting first just the tool preferences, and then all the photoshop preferences. There has been no change...Still unable to get define custom shape as an option.
I've also tried using the path option instead of the shape selection and that also makes no difference.
Just as a note I have used the same steps on another computer running CS6 and it functions 100% properly.

Customer Master zone Customer Transportation Zone Is Greyed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for