Customization of Material Usage & CFOP determination for Barzil Country

Dear Experts,
Is it possible to define new Material Usages (apart from 0,12 & 3) in customization? Where in SPRO we can define this. Or atleast is it possible to change the description of the Material Usages in SPRO. We have business requirement to change the description of this Material Usage printed in PO Print out using SmartForms.
Thanks in advance for your solutions for this.
Regards
Basavaraj Patil

Hi Basavaraj.
It is not possible. Give me an example what do you want to print? It is related to material usage or the business want to use for another purpose?
Regards
Eduardo Chagas

Similar Messages

Shipping data could not be determined for the material

hi all,
while creating STOs for i get a message that shipping data for the material canoot be determined for the material. the plants are maintained as customers. the shipping tab in item detail in STO order is not appearing. the shipping point is getting dertmined for sales orders from the same plant and material. am also able to ceate STOs between other pair of plants.
thnx in advance
saurabh
Message was edited by:
saurabh diwakar

Hi,
Shipping point is determined by "shipping conditions" + "loading group" + "plant".
Shipping conditions are fetched from customer master / or if maintained in the sales doument type they are fetched from there.
Loading group fetched from material master.
Plant fetched from CMIR / CMR / MMR.
You do the shipping point determination using the transaction code "OVL2" If SC or LG or PLANT are deviating from the entries in the customer or material master then also you will not get the shipping point.
Reward points if solution helps.
Regards,
Allabaqsh G. Patil

MC44: material usage value affected by factory calendar

Hi Gurus,
I've got the following problem: on my 4.6c R3 production instance factory calendar had been setup as 7 working days a week but recently the need was to change it to 5 working days a week due to the introduction of route calculation to determine correct dates for the sales orders.
We changed the factory calendar (which did deliver the correct result for the sales orders) only to discover that the "Usage" value determined for the materials by MC44 got totally wrong (usage with the 5 working days calendar was approximately 30 to 50% LESS than with the 7 days working calendar !!)
As soon as we did restore factory calendar back to 7 working days a week MC44 was again fine (obviously sales orders date got wrong...).
My impression is that everything is based on the way data from table MVER is determined depending on the factory calendar (which is apparently driven by function module DATE_CONVERT_TO_FACTORY_DATE).
I guess I could change from customizing the calendar for the shipping point: in that case my expectation is that sales orders date should be fine as well as results from MC44 but I'm not totally sure about that.
Any idea ? Do you know which is the way table MVER is populated based on the calendar settings ?
Many thanks in advance for your help.
Enrico

Hi Jurgen,
from the logical point of view sounds reasonable but....
1) even if I didn't fully debug the program (otherwise I guess I would know the answer ) looks like MVER is the only one considered in terms of usage
2) even if you forget point 1 (I could obviously be wrong) you're missing one information that I didn't mention: our usage (or consumption if you prefer) is 98% done from Monday to Friday; sometimes we do something on Saturday but this is kind of an exception.
Based on the above, despite the factory calendar is setup on 7 working days a week, our material usage is basically done on 5 working days a week. Described this way you'll immediately understand that, even if the program reads the data based on the number of working days, changing the calendar from 7 to 5 should cause a decrease of only 2-3%, in our case changing the factory calendar from 7 to 5 working days is causing a decrease of 30% to 50%.
I believe the program is reading the table in a different way based on the factory calendar, I'll try to give you an example:
      Day     Usage
01   Mon       10
02   Tue        20
03   Wed      30
04   Thu        40
05   Fri          50     ---> total week 1 far 150
06   Sat         2
07   Sun        0      -
> total of the weekend 2
08   Mon       100
09   Tue        200
10   Wed        300
11   Thu       400
12   Fri        500     -
> total week 2 1500
13   Sat        6
14   Sun       0        -
> total of the weekend 6
For the 2 weeks, factory calendar 7 working days a week, total usage would be 1658.
In your case, switching to 5 working days a week, it should deliver usage only for Monday to Friday, which is 1658 - (2+6)=1650    (i.e. difference is peanuts)
As I said, I couldn't get to the end of the debug, but my impression was that, switching to 5 working days a week (based on the above example) the program would read 10 "days" so from Monday 01 to Wednesday 10, in that case the total would be 1658 - (4005006) = 752 (now difference is huge...).
So...... maybe main question could be: which is the way MVER is populated ?
Best regards,
Enrico

Material not listed for destination country

Hi Gurus,
i have an error when i create a Sales Order...
"Material TEST not listed for destination country US"
Can anyone help me to fix this error?
regards
Kumara

Hi Kumaran...
This is clearly the case of Material listing....
This is happening just because for that particular customer/Country you might have made the configuration through material determination that, he can order materials only which is listed to him.
In other words, That customer/Country can only order the materials which is in the list created by you through material determination.
If you desire to add this material to the list... go to Tcode VBO1 (its 'o1" not 'zero 1') and select the type as A001 (Listing). Just check weather the material is listed there.. if not.. add the material to the list.
Hope this help.. Reward if this is informative...
Thanks,
Safeer Rahman

Customization for Material Usage for Brazil Country

Dear Experts,
Is it possible to define new Material Usages (apart from 0,12 & 3) in customization? Where in SPRO we can define this. Or atleast is it possible to change the description of the Material Usages in SPRO. We have business requirement to change the description of this Material Usage printed in PO Print out using SmartForms.
Thanks in advance for your solutions for this.
Regards
Basavaraj Patil

Hi Basavaraj.
It is not possible. Give me an example what do you want to print? It is related to material usage or the business want to use for another purpose?
Regards
Eduardo Chagas

Item Category Determination for sales document- Item USAGE

Hi dear all.
I read already the discussions held around this subject, as I'm facing a similar problem for which I cannot find a solution.
I have the need to set up a ItCat determination for sales order ZPD.
The proposed ItCat must be ZPDW. However, for the NORM ItCat Group we have already a setup which cannot be changed.
This is the present status.
SaTy ItCatGrp Usage HLevItCat Proposed ItCat
ZPD NORM ZPD
I need that the proposed ItCat is ZPDW, under the same conditions
SaTy ItCatGrp Usage HLevItCat Proposed ItCat
ZPD NORM ? ZPDW
For that I believe that I'll have to play along with the Usage.
But how?
What triggers an USAGE during sales order creation? Is it related to the entered material. In a NORM material, how can a usage be deducted?
Thanks for your feedback on this issue.
Rui Viegas

It is possible , either one of the item category u can make as proposed and another one as manual. So while creating sale order u need to change it manually
Sam

No value could be determined for variable (Material)

Hi,
I have Planning filter where im restricting the Material with a Zvariable. This is a Customer Exit variable. This works fine in development but throws me error No value could be determined for variable (Material) in QA system.
Could some one help me in resolving this in
Thanks

either your code is wrong or you just have no data.
debug the code, check if you do have the desired data according to your code.
regards
Cornelia

Plant Determination for Third Party Material as Child Item in Sales Order

Hi All,
We have an issue with the Plant Determination for Third Party Material as Child Item in a Sales Order.
Even when a Delivering Plant is maintained for the child item which is a Third Party Material, the plant of the Parent Item is only populated as the Default plant in the Sales Order
Can someone explain the reason behiind this determination.
P.S.- For all non -Third PartyChild Items (with non-Third Party Item Catefory & Material Type), the Plant is population correctly as per Delivering plant in Material Master.
TIA.
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi,
Thanks everyone for the feedback.I agree with Samir Danish.It is a standard functionality of SAP which does not allow free goods for BOM material.
However, can someone suggest work around to deal with this issue.I mean if any one has been doing any work around for this issue then please let me know.It s becoming critical for me.
Regards,
BM

Two requirement type determined for PIR of a material

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario wherein for one of the material with stragety 50, when the PIR is getting transferred from one info structure to Demand Management (Version A0) i get two line items for the same demand in MD63. I.e one line item with requriement type VSE and another line item with requirement type VSFB. The transfer is through a custom program.
What could be the reason for this? Why two requirement types are determined for the material? What is the determining factor?
Thanks in advance for the response
Best Regards,
Ganesh

You mean that the two line items in MD63 belongs to the different version ; active and inactive one?
Several things you can check.
1 First check the MC7F whether configuration of your info structure is link to DM automatically (in Sync with Demand Management section). If you create the transfer again, it may have duplicate records in demand management.
2. Do you use the mass processing to transfer the data? If so, please check the activity. If you set the transfer twice, then it is duplicate.
3. Maybe someone maintained them manually and enter the requirement plan. Normally the transfer from SIS will have blank requirement plan. Maybe you can check whether the requirement plan is maintained for any of the lines (in the item tab).
If you can do the screen shot for us, it will be very helpful to analyze.

Batch Determination for material in Process Order

Hello,
I need to set up a Batch determination strategy for the Raw material at IM level for a Process Order.
Basically the materials are Batch Managed and already have a Batch number assigned to it.
I just want to use a simple strategy of determining material with the oldest GR datel(FIFO) during the Process Order creation/release or during the Process Order confirmation.
Can you guide me how to set up the strategy and the conditions to do a FIFO for the materials during the Process order.
Thanks in Advance
SAP FANS....

Hi,
Only Problem with this FIFO strategy in which you want to do Batch Determination with reference to Oldest GR date is GR date itself.
Batch determination will only possible if Batch Characteristic values are maintain.What I have observe for this GR date is if we use this as a Reference Characteristic in that case also Value is not set automatically in the Batch Data, so value of the GR date is maintain manually.Pls check it your end if no problem then The rest of the things for Batch determination are not difficult.
Use below link for Batch determination,
[Batch Management and Determination |Re: Browser Based PI sheet]
Regards,
Dhaval

Output Determination for Material movement

Hi All,
I am configuring output Determination for Material movement.
In my case, am doing the config when the movement type is 311, we want to generate IDoc.
i have configured everything, output type,output Determination schema..
When i am trying to maintain the condition record for the same through MN21,
here i am facing one problem on Partner Function.
Here what partner functuion i'll give.
waiting for all valuable response.
Regards
Indrashish

Hello Indrashish,
Maintain that output type as partner independent.
This will help.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Error during material determination for sales document item - RRB

Hi
Iam getting following error when trying to create a billing request using DP91.
Error during material determination for sales document item 40001560/000010
Message no. AD01155
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
I have checked my DIP profile using ODP02 there are no errors in it, I have created a Setid and assigned it to costing element in selection criteria and material determination criteria.
Material origin is checked in costing tab in material master.
Appreciate help in resolving this.
thanks,
Vaishnavi

Hi Vaishnavi
The error which you are getting is related to costing.So kindly reach your FI Consultant
please check the following links which may help you.Also check the link that has been provided my Lakshmipathi
ERROR AT DP90 TRANSACTION
Regards
Srinath

No price could be determined for material/batch DWFB1.1-07GL2/ plant DAAL

Hi Gurus,
While doing GR (MB31) of Finish product DWFB1.1-07GL2 in plant DAAL, we are getting this error.
No price could be determined for material/batch DWFB1.1-07GL2/ plant DAAL
Message no. CK465
Diagnosis
The system could not calculate a price for material/batch DWFB1.1-07GL2/ in plant DAAL for valuation view 0, because none of the valuation strategies in valuation variant 007 was successful.
We kept price control for finised good material master rececord is 'V'
I assigned valuation variant 007 to the plant DAAL.
Pls. suggest the solution.
Praveen

hi,
Please check same valuation variannt has been configured in order costing variant or apprearing order control data.
Did you maintained MAP for that material in material master?
Regards,
Ashok

Service Contract Determination for material product

Hello,
I am trying to implement service contract determination for a complaint and I observe that the service contract gets determined at the complaint item level only when I add a service type product at the item level and not when I add a product of material type. Is this a system limitation that a service contract can be determined only for a service product or am I missing some configuration? Has anyone else faced a similiar issue?
Thanks,
Divya.

hi divya
the contract get determined even after adding product of type material
1.create a srv contract (sc)
2.add product of type material
3. release the contract and save it (note the no.)
4.create a trnx complaint(crmc) maintain the setting fr contract determinition(F)
5.put the product in trnx and ur contract will get determined
see if it suffice ur requirement
"reward points if u find useful"

In DP50 Error during material determination for service order

Hi,
While doing Resources-Related Billing request,the following error is displaying..
Kindly Help
Error during material determination for service order
Message no. AD01156
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
501384
Message no. AD01156
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
Thanks,
Mohit

Hi mohit,
You need to check DIP profile setting if profile is attached to your order type or not please check this
Thanks and regards
Sachin Kadam

Customization of Material Usage & CFOP determination for Barzil Country

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for