Customizing for RFx Response Comparison

Hi All
Our requirement is to add some new fields in the RFx Response Comparison View
Currently there are fields like Quantity, Net Price, Unit of Measurement ,Product id .
We want to add new fields like Incoterms key, Incoterms location, Payment terms for comparison .
Do we have any customization to achieve this ?
Thanks
Ramakanth

HI,
There is no standard configuration step to get these fields in the response comparison screen. to achieve the same you will
have to do some z developement.
Regards
Sam

Similar Messages

POWL for RFx Response

Is there any possibility to create a POWL for "RFx Response"?
We could see a category QUOT under IMG>CROSS APPLICATION COMPONENTS>GENERIC SAP BUSINESS SUITE FUNCTIONS>PERSONAL OBJECT WORK LIST>DEFINE CATEGORIES.
But we are not able to see any Application (neither FEEDER OR AS-advanced search) or Query ID for the same.
For example, we wanted a POWL of RFx responses which are accepted but PO/contract not prepared.
Any idea how to achive this?
GH

if anybody likes to answer... still question is open...you are welcome!
GH

Blank Line Item for Rfx Response with Limit Item

Hi All,
I have a problem in rfx response for limit item. When creating RFx for limit item, I am using display limit as 'Available to Bid On' and using short text in RFx line item (not using product code). But when bidder creating rfx response, all field in line item is blank (no short text, product category, currency, etc) and bidder need to click on details to see item data. Is this a standard?FYI I'am using SRM 7.0 with extended classic scenario.
I already try display limit as 'Accept or Reject Possible' but the problem still persists.
Rgds,
Aleluya.

Hello Aleluya,
As per standard system behaviour you user should be able to see these details in the Item overview screen itself. There is no need to navigate to the details of the same to view them.
Only to enter price bidder needs to go details of the limit item.
Have you done any custom changes for the reported scenario here or you are using the standard feature.
Best Regards,
Rahul

Pricing in SRM for RFx response

Dear SRM Experts,
We are using sourcing scenario in SRM 7.0 EHP 1 and are inviting bids from international as well domestic vendors.
Bids contain varoious price components apart from the basic price like deleivery cost, insuarance, packing and forwarding etc. Based on this price components we wanted to calculate the landed cost of the material.
Since SRM only has one calculation schema 0100 for mainatenance group 01QU ( RFx response) i wanted inputs on how difference schema can be mapped into SRM for calculating the net price from RFx response.
Any pointers on the same will be apperciated.
Regards,
Darshan

Hi Ramki,
First of all i am really honoured to have reply from you. I have referred your book many a times during the implementation as well as support phase.
Presently we are working for one of the client wherein the requirement is that the responses received from various bidders having values against different pricing condition needs to compared before the L1 bidder is finalized and PO is placed. Landed cost of material needs to be calculated for the Bids received from international as well as domestic bidders which would have different conditions.
I have created various condition types in the maintanace group 01QU (RFx responses). So that those conditions can be populated in RFx at time of publishing and we can receive the values against those conditions in response. There is need to calculate the landed cost of material at the time of comparison report generation.
Using IPC i think wont be feasible because anyways we need to calculate landed differently for domestic as international vendors. Also from stability perspective this is not advisable.
I would request if i can get pointers to map this requirement.
With Regards,
Darshan

RFX Response Header : Fill Display Fields on Header Level

Hi Gurus,
There is a requirement at the client place to add the Display only field for RFx Response Header. Based on this required I have done the following activities.
1. From 'Define Customer Display Fields on Header Level' in SPRO i have appended the ZFIELD in the Response header structure.
2. From 'Configure Control for Fields on Header Level' in SPRO i have made it visible true.
3. From 'Fill Display Fields on Header Level' SPRO i have Enhanced the /SAPSRM/BD_PDO_FE_FILL_HEADER with implementation. And have given required filter criteria. In the implementation Class it has the return parameter as CS_HEADER_DATA. Where i could fill the my ZFIELD.
The field is now displaying in the SRM portal. But the problem is that the ZFIELD is not being filled with any value, even though i supplied it.
Is there any step that is missing to set the value?
Regards,
Hobs

Hi,
The main technique is to do your calculations in PAI of the screen for additional data B for the line item but as you said it is accessed only when you goto-> item -> additional dataB
So you can do one more thing...do the calculation in PAI/PBO of the screen first and in userexit_save_document_prepare recalculate again and overwrite the old ones(or calculate for only the ones which are initial in the item) ..so if he goes to additional data B screen you give the user what he wants and if he doesn't userexit_save_document_prepare takes care of it
user can go to additional dataB only a line item at a time so the chance that he takes all the line items one by one is less(for huge number of line items)..so you just calculate and overwrite the fields in the in the userexit if the field value is empty...or you can recalculate for all the cases and overwrite just in case there may be a problem....
in the screen of the additional dataB
Write logic for calculating the field values
so in the userexit you write like
if the fields are initial..
calculate
else
*already calculated from the screen because user has viewed it
endif.
So you are safe that user can see what he wants and you can reassure that the value will be calculated and stored on the SAVE from user exit
Please check,revert
Reward if helpful
Regards
Byju

A fatal error occured in the PD Layer during RFx response

Dear Experts,
While creating the RFx response the error is,
"A fatal error occured in the PD Layer. The transaction needs to be terminated."
I just checked the earlier threads discussed on this forum says, this is due to non maintaining of number ranges , but i have maintained the no ranges for RFx response,
got stuck here, kindly help me to solve this issue.
Thanks

Sorry wrongly posted... the details are below.
The Rfx response no range 01 & 02 are matching with transaction type Supplier quote 01 & 02,
In Define Transaction type -- for Transaction category BUS2200 -- Transaction type RFQU -- the entries are
*Tran.cat Trns.type subsequent obj.type Follow up trns.type
*Bus2200 RFQU BUS2202 ECPO
The entries are correct or not???
Regards
Rakesh

How to integrate WD url in standard RFX response task

Hi Experts,
we have set up a process controlled workflow for RFX response in SRM,The standard task used is 40007981,the problem is we have to integrate one webdynpro link inside the task,the process is to first determine the webdynpro URL using FM(as it will change from dev to quality system) and then use the URL value in task description for creating a hyperlink.I have used the same approch in application controlled workflow,But here the task is standard,So not sure how to make changes in the task??i want to understand will coping the task into another task and using the ztask will work??or i have to create enhancements in standard task itself?if i follow the second approach what will be the impact and most importantly? willl that work?
Regards
Sonika

Hi,
Yes, you can copy the standard task by using transaction PFTC_COP and then modify it as per your requirement.
After making all changes use this task in your workflow.
Thanks and regards,
SNJY

RFx response version incorrect

I have activated version management for RFx response. But I notice that the version numbers are not correctly displayed
The first time i changed the response, system displayed versions 1 and 2
When I changed the response again, system showed version numbers as 1, 1 and 3
Any idea why it did not display the versions as 1,2 and 3

What SRM release are you running?
What are the version types associated with 1, 2, or 3 that is shown on your "tracking" tab (SRM 7) or "version" tab (SRM 5 or below)?

Function not available for this responsibility - Custom Form

Hello All,
We developed a custom form and was working fine in Testing instance.
Last week testing instance was refreshed.
After that all the custom forms are not working. Seeded forms are working properly.
We checked the form setup(ie form, function, menu and we ran compile security and bounced the server).
Custom reports under the custom top are working fine.
Only the form functions throwing the error
"Function is not available for this responsibility".
Any ideas. Is the test.class having any impact on this.
Regards,
Kannan Balasubramanian.

Hi,
Last week testing instance was refreshed.your answer is that the refreshed has remove the custom top definition from your environment.
Check this
knick

RFx Response Required for All Items

Hi Team
Kindly we use SRM 7 EHP1 with business scenario ( Extend Classic Scenario )
IN Restricted RFx Item level there are checkbox ( RFx Response Required for All Items )
We use it but does not work I do not know why ? any help from you ?

Can you be more specific on behavior of system and why you feel the functionality is not working.

How to resrict purchaser accept more than one RFx response ?

hi all
we use SRM 7.0 with standalone scenario.
when the purchaser carry out Response comparison , system permit purchaser accept more than one bidder for one RFx item . the result is we want material A 10 piece, but supplier X and supplier Y get PO for 10 piece material A each.
we want to restrct this operation, please give me some advices, thanks.
regards
claud

You might want to try restricting at the PO creation time. Implement BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI for PO (BBP_PO_CHANGE method). In the logic, check the related proceeding RFx's item total quantity against its existing follow-on POs' item quantity. If adding the quantity of the current PO exceeds the total RFx item quantity, throw an error to prevent the current PO from being created.

Rfx Response - Un-Qouted items

Dear All;
We are using SRM7.0
In RFx response , how the bidder indicates that he is not quoting for certain items. Currently, when we leave the price as zero, the system considers it as free item.
Thanks

Dear HARSHB;
Thanks for your reply.
We are using SRM7 where our system's behavior is totally opposite of what you are syaing.
In our system, while creating RFx response, if we leave the price as zero for any item, the system will display a message Saying:
Line 0001: '0' in the price field means that you are offering the item for free
Line 0002: '0' in the price field means that you are offering the item for free
Line 0003: '0' in the price field means that you are offering the item for free.
for quoted qty, unlike what you said, the system accepts the quoted qty to be changed to zero and in this case, it is not giving the above message i.e. it will not consider it as free item but in price comparison it will show the price of un-quoted items as ??? (3 question marks).
I don't know what is the system standard.
Regards

Contract Mass Update from Bid/RFx Response functionality

In SRM 7.0 we have the following SPRO settings. Kindly explain me about Contract Mass Update from Bid/RFx Response functionality
SRM Server > Cross-Application Basic Settings > Contract Mass Update from Bid/RFx Response >
Define Process Parameters
Set Default Parameters
Thanks
srini

Hi,
Contract mass update Process starts when an RFx response or bid is accepted. Where items in the RFx response or bid have the same suppliers, the same currencies, and the same products as one or more existing contract, the contract(s) is (are) updated with the prices and other header/item information from the RFx response or bid. If the RFx response or bid contains new products, these can also be attached to existing contracts with the same supplier and currency (append function), or a new contract can created.
Coming to configuration part:
Define process parameters: Where you can define whether you want to update zero price quoted items to existing contracts or not (include / exclude options are available)
Set default parameters: Where we can control contract parameters for updated (either default / from RFx or BId), following SAP explanation will give you more clarity on it.
In this Customizing activity, you define which parameters are, by default, part of the contract mass update from an RFx response or a bid. To do this, select the Default Indicator.
You can select the Lock indicator to prevent the user from doing the following:
Deselecting a parameter that has been defined as a default parameter in Customizing
Selecting a parameter that has not been defined as a default parameter in Customizing
Regards,
krish

Can't Create Contract From RFx Response (SAP SRM 7.0)

Dear Expert,
Could you help me,
i have create rfx, response the rfx and accepted the rfx response.
After i have accepted that RFx, i would like to make a contract from this RFx response. Via menu Create Contract.
But this error is show up.
Error application is coming up.
20111020
RHESAS
093450
sapgsd
http://sapgsd.garuda-indonesia.com:8011/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm_oif
OBJECTS_OBJREF_NOT_ASSIGNED
Access via 'NULL' object reference not possible.
Method: PST95E57RQRHC49FBLT5QTJBJT9Z of program /1BCWDY/NC67WCWB50U4IGZ40GZ1==CP
Method: IF_WDR_VIEW_DELEGATE~WD_DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program /1BCWDY/NC67WCWB50U4IGZ40GZ1==CP
Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_DELEGATING_VIEW========CP
Method: MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_VIEW===================CP
Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_CLIENT_COMPONENT=======CP
Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_WINDOW_PHASE_MODEL=====CP
Method: PROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_WINDOW_PHASE_MODEL=====CP
Method: PROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_WINDOW=================CP
Method: EXECUTE of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP
Method: IF_WDR_RUNTIME~EXECUTE of program CL_WDR_MAIN_TASK==============CP
http://sapgsd.garuda-indonesia.com:8011/sap/bc/webdynpro/sapsrm/wda_l_fpm
Do you have any idea to solve this issue?
(we are activate Procurement for Public Sector Functions )
Regards,
Rhesa Syahrial

Hi All,
I have solved this issue.
I missed the configuration in Partner Grouping schema ID.
Regards,
Rhesa Syahrial

Collaborators in SAP Sourcing 10.0 must not view RFx responses unless assigned as scoreres

Dear SAP Sourcing Specialists,
We are implementing SAP Sourcing 10.0 We assign collaborators on an RFx as
with the collaborator approver role before it is published, and these collaborators
review, edit and approve the RFx and then it is published to suppliers. After responses are received from suppliers and RFx is now in
Closed for Responses phase, we do not want these original collaborators to view the RFx responses unless they are assigned as scorers.
How do we achieve this? We tried to re-assign the Review collaborator role to these collaborators but they can still view RFx
responses.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
1.Create an RFx in SAP Sourcing 10
2. Assign collaborators with approval role
3. Collaborators approve RFx
4. Move RFx to Open for Responses
5. Suppliers respond to RFx
6. Rfx closes. RFx becomes "Closed for Responses"
7. Log in as one of the collaborators
8. We do not want the collaborator to view RFx responses unless assigned as a
scorerer
Kind regards
Pedzi

Why don't just use standard functionality in Page Customisations?
You can Hide/Unhide a Tab with Dimension Field <%USER_GROUP%> and Group Reference.
It's a clean, standard way and guaranteed to work and not break anything.
Bogdan Toma

Customizing for RFx Response Comparison

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for