Customizing transports

We run 4.6C on iSeries. Recently we upgraded the OS to V6R1. Development and test systems are on one server. Production has its own server. After the OS upgrade customizing transports are not applied to production. The transport log shows all is well but the changes are not on production system. I have to run $SYNC to apply the changes to production system. Workbench transports do not have this problem. Has anyone experienced this issue after OS upgrade to v6r1?
I appreciate your suggestions.
Berhanu

Hi Berhanu,
then I would assume - which I cannot believe - that the buffer sync is "dead" ... it happens all 2 minutes and if the timestamp is rubbish, this would be an option - have seen this once only ...
Then I can only suggest an OSS ticket, if it is reproducible and the parameter is correct ...
... still cannot believe that ...
Regards
Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag
http://www.consolut.com http://www.4soi.de http://www.easymarketplace.de

Similar Messages

  • F4 help for Customizing Transport Request Field....

    Hi,
    I need a Function Module for F4 help for Customizing Transport Request field. I have used the below FM but I ma able to get only Customizing TR for only Login User Name only but not other Users. How to get the Customizing TR which are created by other Users(Owner is diferent from Login Owner).
    PARAMETERS: p_cts  TYPE e070-trkorr OBLIGATORY.
    AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR p_cts.
      PERFORM get_cts CHANGING p_cts.
    *&      Form  get_cts
    FORM get_cts  CHANGING p_cts.
      TYPE-POOLS trwbo.
      DATA: lv_cts TYPE trwbo_request_header.
    To Get only custimzing requests
      CALL FUNCTION 'TR_REQUEST_CHOICE'
        EXPORTING
          iv_request_types     = 'W'
        IMPORTING
          es_request           = lv_cts
        EXCEPTIONS
          invalid_request      = 1
          invalid_request_type = 2
          user_not_owner       = 3
          no_objects_appended  = 4
          enqueue_error        = 5
          cancelled_by_user    = 6
          recursive_call       = 7
          OTHERS               = 8.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
            WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
        CALL FUNCTION 'POPUP_DISPLAY_MESSAGE'
          EXPORTING
            titel = 'Transport'
            msgid = sy-msgid
            msgty = sy-msgty
            msgno = sy-msgno
            msgv1 = sy-msgv1
            msgv2 = sy-msgv2
            msgv3 = sy-msgv3
            msgv4 = sy-msgv4.
      ENDIF.
    Pass the selected TR to selection screen
      IF sy-subrc = 0.
        MOVE lv_cts-trkorr TO p_cts.
      ENDIF.
    ENDFORM.                    " get_cts
    Regards,
    Deepthi.

    Instead of using FM 'TR_REQUEST_CHOICE', you can have direct database select on table E070 and E071.
    In E070, the field TRFUNCTION determine the customizing and workbench request.
    K->     Workbench Request
    W->     Customizing Request

  • Sequence of Customizing transports

    Hi Community,
    I have a question on transports that has been boggling my mind and I haven't found a satisfactory response as yet online.
    Here is the scenario: Customizing TR 1 - Contains say plants
                                   Customizing TR2  - Contains say storage locations
                                   Customizing TR3  - Assign storage location to plant.
    So basically, what I am saying is TR3 is dependent on TR1 and TR2.
    Now for customizing transports does the sequence of transport matter? Basically, say I move TR3 followed by TR2 and TR1, but I make sure I move all. In that case will the transports fail? When we import customizing TRs, does the foreign key checks run in the importing system?
    I was under the assumption that for customizing TRs, sequence doesn't matter. What matters is we move all that make a logical group? Can any of the ABAP experts here help on this? Thanks!!

    Here is how I see it:
    1. I can feed in any kind of data in a database table using an ABAP program's 'Update' statement. Hence, I could override any constraint/foreign key check that I would have imposed in SE11.
    2. Similarly, if I release a TR, considering the update in the importing system would happen via an ABAP program, my take is the data would get written to the database. However, if we don't move all the TRs, it would lead to an inconsistent customizing, as we had predecessor nodes. For ex, if I just move TR3, what I am saying is, the import would be successful. However, if you open the node in customzing, the view might show error - saying invalid plant or invalid storage location but the TR import as such wont fail.
    Hence, the sequence is not important. What is important is we move the complete logical set. The order would not matter. Is this a correct analysis? Any views?

  • Custom Transport Protocol in OSB

    Hi,
    How custom transport protocol can be created in OSB? can any one guide me on this?
    Regards,
    Amik

    Hi BLowery
    I looked through our internal servers and was not able to find any examples for J1939 for LabWindows CVI. As you mention, you can still use the XNET functions to build up your code from there. If you have the chance to open the VIs see the code in the J1939 Transport Protocol Reference Example, this could be a good start point for building up your code on CVI. 
    Hopefully, if someone has worked in this before, the might be able to provide suggestions or share their resources with you in this forum.
    WenR

  • About Customizing transport request..

    Hi ,
    I created a customizing transport request , but I cannot add objects. It is showing "You cannot use the request. It has a wrong type". Help me , how to use Customizing request.
    Regards
    ASADUZZAMAN

    HiASADUZZAMAN
    You cannot use the request. It has a wrong type
    Is above error a warning or error?
    Double click on above information when you are getting you may get more inputs to analyze.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagendra.

  • What is customizing transport?

    what is customizing transport
    Title was edited by:
            Alvaro Tejada Galindo

    To guarantee the consistency of Customizing entries in the source system and in the target system, special processing is required for transportable objects.
    When processing in the source system, special entries are made for the transport in addition to the normal versions. These transport versions only contain the changed status for the object, similar to pending processing.
    When transporting to the target system, only these specific transport entries are taken into account. In the target system, the changes are inserted into Customizing objects in the same way as when you release a pending object.
    Details on Transporting Customizing Entries Using a Transport Application

  • Customer Master zone Customer Transportation Zone Is Greyed

    Dear Friends
                            I want to make customer master transportation zone field to be optional entry.I did necessary  changes in OBD2,OB20 and OVT0.After making optional entry in all area it is been with grey mode that is not editable.But if  I  change as required entry  then it is changed as required field that  is editable mode.But I need only optional entry.Can any one help me  on this...
    Regards
    Ganesh
    Posting in all CAPs or BOLD, represents shouting, kindly avoid this in your future post.
    Message was edited by Moderator: Jyoti Prakash

    I did necessary  changes in OBD2,OB20 and OVT0
    In OB20, which one you have selected and through which tcode you were checking?
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Urgent  - Customizing transport order not present in transDIR

    Hello Gurus
    We have an issue with tranport Order for a customizing project . After a system
    migration the development team started to work on the DEV server without TMS and transport routes to QUA configured . Tasks and Request were by mistake released then as Local change request in DEV  . Now the TMS has been configured , but  the tasks can not be exported in the /cofiles /datas directories to be imported in QUA .
    Is it possible somehow to reassign the scope of the Released Change request to transportable or regenerate the task in order to transport it to QUA, as the whole customizing represent more 1 week of work !
    Thanks a lot for your help .

    Thanks for your fast answer
    I was able to reassign the Object to a new transportable request one in SE01
    Menu  -> Object list  ->  include object .
    I will instruct the customer to do so and keep you posted .
    What is the difference with the copy tranpost request option ?
    Many  thanks to both of you .
    Best regards .
    Lionel

  • Customizing Transport Request Assignment process to Local Objects

    Hi,
    I am developing custom report, which will find out all dependent and local objects for given transport request. When we select the local objects and save, it has to show standard saving process screens...like package and TR screens.
    I am trying the above problem using 'TRINT_TADIR_POPUP', 'TRINT_ORDER_CHOICE' and 'TRINT_APPEND_TO_COMM_ARRAYS' function module, but this function module 'TRINT_APPEND_TO_COMM_ARRAYS' giving exception ob_check_obj_error.
    So, please let me know anyone have solution for assigning local objects to package and TR through customization (Programmatically).
    Thanks,
    Param..:-)

    Hi Sheetal,
    Thanks for the reply.
    For this function module ADD_TO_PACKAGE, I can't import package name or Transport Request.
    I need to have a save screen's, which generally we get during saving of any R/3 Object.
    Thanks,
    Param...:-)

  • Check STMS Customizing Transport request for equal entries

    Hi
    We use the BADI "CTS_REQUEST_CHECK" for some precheck before create and / or release customizing TA to inform the user that someone else is using the same customizing object in transport xy.
    Following scenario:
    Transport request 4711 is created 20.01.10 contains object "A" and released for testing in integrationsystem
    Transport request 4715 is created 10.04.10 contains object "A" and released for testing in integrationsystem
    When importing transport 4715 into productivsystem with STMS single transport there should be an error message that it's not allowed until transport 4711 is in productivsystem.
    Which BADI or Userexit could help me?
    Thanks in advance
    Michael

    Hi Diego,
    Thanks for your reply.
    I tranported the 'Default values for tax codes', are we suppose to do any pre/post activity to tranport this request.
    @Ravi: As you suggested i compared the transported before and after transport in our Dev and QA server. there is no mismatch.
    Many Thanks,
    Shanthosh

  • Customizing Transport Error

    Dear Experts,
    I have a Customizing Table and a Text Table. I have a Customzing Maintenance View created for it.
    I changed the values in my DEV System from :
    1  a
    2  b
    3  c
    to (New Values)
    1 x..change in text
    2 y..change in text
    deleted the third one..
    Already earlier the previous values do exist in TST System.
    1  a
    2  b
    3  c
    now i take a customzing request for the new values..and Transport but the value looks as below in TST.
    1 x...updated good
    2 y ..updated good
    3 c..should not be there since i have deleted the third one and Transported but yet there in TST.
    I have tried regenerating the Table Maintenance and Transporting the regenerated View in Workbench..
    yet no results...
    Please help me and guide me if i have to do anything more..
    Thanks to all the SDN Users in advance:
    Kiranmai

    Refer [link1|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm32/helpdata/en/67/86b298415811d1893d0000e8323c4f/content.htm] and [Link2|http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&q=creatingatransportrequestmanuallyfortable+entries&meta=&aq=f&oq=]
    [Removing table entry|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm32/helpdata/en/67/86b28b415811d1893d0000e8323c4f/content.htm]

  • Custom transports for Oracle Financials or JD Edwards

    Is anyone aware of a product/plug-in on the market that was built using the ALSB Transport SDK to connect to Oracle Financials or JD Edwards?

    Diego,
    You will need to go further in your setup. I have a few questions.
    1. Are you on World or E1? This post is in the World forum.
    2. What release and tools version are you running?
    3. Once we find this out you need to see if 11g is supported with Oracle MTR's.
    Once we know 11g is supported a simple search on Oracle should get you the documents or even opening a call with them and have them provide this info to you should get you what you are asking.
    IF you are E1 you can find the version by simply looking at the name of the folder on the deployment server (i.e. if you are on 812 the folder will have 812, or if you are on 811 it will show 811). If you need to find the tools release you can check the ptf.log file in the bin32 folder on your deployment server. Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions.

  • How to create a transport request/customizing table?

    Hi,...
    I have create a table that can be maintained by sm30 in development system. How can I configure this table, so user can maintain this in development system only and create a customizing transport request to transport all data in this dev table to production.
    Any help, links would be appreciated thanks

    Yusuf,
    Shekhar has given you the right answer.  With the standard recording routine switched on you will be prompted everytime you save changes via SM30.
    Have you re-generated the maintenance dialog since setting this flag?
    Or, perhaps the client you are testing in does not have the automatic recording switched on (check in transaction SCC4, should have the setting Automatic recording of changes for your client).
    Cheers,
    Brad

  • Transport customizing objects in transport of copies

    Hallo,
    my question is, if I can include objects from customizing transport into transport of copies and transport them only into specific system. What is differences between transport objects in transport of copies and customizing transport. Generaly I understand what is diferent between those type transport, but.. My interest is mainly what can be bad with customizing objects in target system after transport of copies and what activities does customizing transport in comparison with customizing transport. Are there any risks??
    thanks a lot for answer
    Edited by: Tomas Chudoba on Oct 19, 2010 2:50 PM

    Hi Tomas,
    The Transports of copies allow you to transport (sub-)objects in an object list into any other SAP System you want.
    Where as Workbench or Customizing requests there is no automatic delivery into other systems for transport of copies.
    Regards,
    Chandu.

  • Sap customizing request  pop-up not getting generated

      Hello Experts,
         I am facing a problem while generating customizing transport request, the transport request creation pop-up is not coming,
    Checked in scc4 - customizing chenges allowed + automatic recording is set and client role is customizing , but still i am unable to see any pop-up for the transport request creation . Please help!!!!
    Regards
    Shubhangi Pandey

    Hi,
    You might have more success raising this question in the relevant functional forum, transaction OOEG does not seem to use generated table maintenance but here on the ABAP development forum you're pretty likely to keep getting the same answer.
    Regards,
    Nick

Maybe you are looking for