Cutomer Block/Unblock reason(XD05)
Hi All,
I would like the change/modify/Add the drop down reason in the Customer Block/Unblock deatils.
like Order Block,Delivery BLock and Billing Block.
Please suggest.
Regards, Vinay
Hi JJ,
Thanks for you rreply.
My problme is solved.
May i know the flow for the same T-code?
Regards
Vinay
Similar Messages
-
BAPI for customer Block/Unblock through transaction code : XD05
Hi Gurus,
I want to block/unblock customer sales areas(Transaction code : XD05) through program. Could you please suggest any BAPI for the same. As writing BDC will not be a good choice.
Please help.
Thanks,
BhupenderHello Bhupender,
the best and easies solution is the MASS maintenance transaction as proposed above.
For the BAPI question, sorry but there is NO BAPI to maintain a customer master data.
The function module provided by my predecessor, even if it has the perfect look like is definitively not the one to use.
Despite the name, this FM is designed to support only the maintenance of CONSUMERs.
Moreover it is not an RFC enabled function module.
It might work in your case, as the data to maintain is quite simple and limited but you still may face several troubles like NO change documents and change pointers created and/or no synchronisation with TREX, CRM, ...
There is also a BAPI with a nice name, but in fact it is designed to be used only with SAP Online Store and SAP Product Catalog.
The only reliable path for investigation is described within [note 384462|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/384462].
A other path for investigation is the class CMD_EI_API which has been introduced with ECC 2005 (6.00).
You could wrap method MAINTAIN_BAPI inside of a bapi function module you would have written.
Otherwise, but still with limited functionality there are some eSOA webservices to find, read, maintain customer master data.
Hope this helps.
BR
Alain -
Can't hard block/unblock Atheros wi-fi card
Hi, since kernel version 3.6 I have a problem regarding my wi fi card: if I deactivate it from another OS I can't re-activate it, and when it is working I can't power it fully off (the led remains lighted).
So, it seems the hard block/unblock is impossible; if I use the key shortcut it's only soft-blocked (or unblocked).
I have a Asus eeepc 1215b, but the problem exists also on two others similar laptops; the involved card are the AR9285 and the AR9485 on mini pci-e.
The last working kernel was 3.5.6-1.
lsmod | grep -i ath9k
ath9k 100775 0
ath9k_common 2096 1 ath9k
ath9k_hw 359706 2 ath9k_common,ath9k
ath 15393 3 ath9k_common,ath9k,ath9k_hw
mac80211 463393 1 ath9k
cfg80211 430289 3 ath,ath9k,mac80211
dmesg | grep -i wlp1s0
[ 3.433341] systemd-udevd[122]: renamed network interface wlan0 to wlp1s0
[ 4.616939] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlp1s0: link is not ready
[ 13.931956] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlp1s0: link is not ready
[ 14.146404] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlp1s0: link is not ready
[ 17.410188] wlp1s0: authenticate with 00:24:89:1c:3f:93
[ 17.422892] wlp1s0: send auth to 00:24:89:1c:3f:93 (try 1/3)
[ 17.425189] wlp1s0: authenticated
[ 17.425506] wlp1s0: associate with 00:24:89:1c:3f:93 (try 1/3)
[ 17.428675] wlp1s0: RX AssocResp from 00:24:89:1c:3f:93 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1)
[ 17.428851] wlp1s0: associated
[ 17.428937] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlp1s0: link becomes ready
Thansk and sorry for any mistakeI checked on kernel.org changelogs between 3.5.6 and 3.6.11, and I found 4 references for ath9k:
1) The most interesting: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel … eLog-3.6.1
ath9k: Disable ASPM only for AR9285
Currently, ASPM is disabled for all WLAN+BT combo chipsets when BTCOEX is enabled. This is incorrect since the workaround is required only for WB195, which is a AR9285+AR3011 combo solution. Fix this by checking for the HW version when enabling the workaround.
From wikipedia: "ASPM is a power management protocol used to manage PCI Express-based serial link devices as links become less active over time. It is normally used on laptops and other mobile Internet devices to extend battery life."
Maybe is this? BTW, the problem exists also with the AR9485...
2) https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel … eLog-3.6.3
ath9k: use ieee80211_free_txskb
commit 249ee72249140fe5b9adc988f97298f0aa5db2fc upstream.
Using ieee80211_free_txskb for tx frames is required, since mac80211 clones
skbs for which socket tx status is requested.
3) https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel … eLog-3.6.5
Revert "ath9k_hw: Updated AR9003 tx gain table for 5GHz"
commit 73b26df5fa1a6245d6fc982362518b620bc7c2fe upstream.
This reverts commit a240dc7b3c7463bd60cf0a9b2a90f52f78aae0fd.
This commit is reducing tx power by at least 10 db on some devices,
e.g. the Buffalo WZR-HP-G450H.
4) https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel … eLog-3.6.7
cfg80211: fix antenna gain handling
commit c4a9fafc77a5318f5ed26c509bbcddf03e18c201 upstream.
No driver initializes chan->max_antenna_gain to something sensible, and
the only place where it is being used right now is inside ath9k. This
leads to ath9k potentially using less tx power than it can use, which can
decrease performance/range in some rare cases.
Rather than going through every single driver, this patch initializes
chan->orig_mag in wiphy_register(), ignoring whatever value the driver
left in there. If a driver for some reason wishes to limit it independent
from regulatory rulesets, it can do so internally.
Any idea? -
Sales of block\unblock customer
Hi all,
I am doing workflow to " notify sales of block/unblock customer ". The transactions to be used are fd05 or xd05. Can anyone pls suggest me the related BOR to trigger the workflow.
Points will be awarded,
thanks,
praveena.Put on the event trace via transaction SWELS. Then perform the action you need to in FD05 or XD05. If an event is triggered it is listed in the event trace. You can read it out via transaction SWEL. In the event trace also the related BO is mentioned. Try if this solves your problem.
By the way: probably you have to do some programming to incoporate the change documents of the BO of the customer. The BO will be BUS1006, but likely the event triggered is BUS1006-CHANGED, which will also be triggered by other changes in the customer (e.g. the name or the address). Look in table CDHDR and CDPOS to find the changedocuments.
Good luck!
Kind regards,
Joost van Poppel
Edited by: Joost van Poppel on Jan 22, 2008 10:00 AM -
Hi Gurus,
can any body tell me
How we can block the Customer?
How we can Unblock The Customer?
wats the functionality of that?
and where the data will be stored?
thanks in advanceDear Dhanush
To block / unblock the customer - VD05 or XD05
In Table KNA1, you can find the following blocks
- AUFSD for Order block
- LIFSD for Delivery block
- FAKSD for Billing block
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Block/unblock customer report
hi all,
plz solve my problm in block/unblock customer reports.
thanksHi Rajiv,
Is it that you want to knwo how to Block and unblock customer if yes the T-Code is VD05.
Regards
Suvin -
Blocked/UnBlocked PO Line Items
Hi Guys,
How to Identify whether a Purchase Order Line Item is Blocked/UnBlocked Internally.
I have a customer code, wherer I have check for Blocked?UnBlocked PO Line Items and according to that I have tod display the Items in a Report.
Many thanks for the Help.
Regards,
Anbalagan.VHi,
In EKPO for that PO line item , if
EKPO-LOEKZ = S i.e. it is blocked
EKPO-LOEKZ = L i.e. it is deleted
EKPO-LOEKZ = null i.e. it is unblocked.
Hope it clarifies.
Bye
anupam -
Help with Blocking/Unblocking GL account for posting
We have a current program to block/unblock GL accounnts for posting and it does direct table update. But this way the user does not know the HISTORY about who did the update. I came to know that by using BDC, history gets created about who made the changes. I am still new to ABAP and with transaction code FS02 I cannot acheive this (blocking/unblocking GL account for posting).
Is there any other transaction code that would let me do this?
Is there an easy way of finding out the correct transaction code?
I found FSSO which is pretty close but my lead said it is not the correct one! Does anyone happen to know the correct transaction code that would let me do blocking/unblocking for G/L account posting?
Thanks.
--MithunHi Mithun,
FS00 txn is used for blocking GL a/c for posting.
You can block/unblock GL a/c based on GL A/c and Company code.
Execute FS00 txn, Click GL account -> Block (in the menubar).
Block/Unblock based in chart of accounts or in company code.
Cheers,
Vikram
Pls reward for helpful replies!! -
Function Module for blocking, unblocking and deleting assets
Hi,
Are there function modules available for blocking,unblocking and deleting assets in SAP.
Can I user 'BAPI_FIXEDASSET_CHANGE' for the same?
Thanks in adavnce,
LaxmanHey,
I tried by putting the values of company code,asset number,subnumber, transaction type as 'A' and passing the value of INLA-XSPEB as 'X' in FM ASSET_MASTERRECORD_MAINTENANCE to block the asset but it is not working. I am trying many other things. Can you suggest what are the mandatory fields that need to be passed for the asset to be blocked.
As there are lot of parameters in this FM, I am little confused. Is there a proper documentation available somewhere to understand the flow.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Laxman Pai. -
Workflow - Customer Block/Unblock
Hi Experts,
We have done workflow settings as per the link
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/Workflow%20for%20Customer%20Blocking%20and%20UnBlocking
for Customer Block/Unblock.
TASK 1 - customer block after create/change - we assined object type ZKNA1 - Method Block,
In our Block method code is as follows
INCLUDE <OBJECT>.
BEGIN_DATA OBJECT. " Do not change.. DATA is generated
DATA:
BEGIN OF KEY,
CUSTOMERNO LIKE KNA1-KUNNR,
END OF KEY.
END_DATA OBJECT. " Do not change.. DATA is generated
BEGIN_METHOD BLOCK1 CHANGING CONTAINER.
update kna1 set sperr = 'X' where kunnr = object-key-customerno.
END_METHOD.
We are unable to get the value of the object-key-customerno in where condition ,
If we dont use where condition all customers are getting blocked.
So how can we get the customer number which is created/changed into my block method?
Please help us.
RajeswariHi ,
I think you can use user-exit to block the customer .
function module : EXIT_SAPMF02D_001
DATA : lv_kna1 type char30 value '(SAPMF02D)KNA1' .
FIELD-SYMBOLS : <fs_xkna1> type kna1 .
ASSIGN : (lv_kna1) TO <fs_xkna1> .
<fs_xkna1>-AUFSD = '01' .
<fs_xkna1>-LIFSD = '01' .
<fs_xkna1>-FAKSD = '01' .
Above abap code is trying to input 01 value in Customer View in order to block the customer , you modify the code to suit your requirement ...
Hope it useful for you .
Best Regrads,
Carlos
Edited by: Carlos Zhang on Oct 13, 2010 6:38 AM -
Purchase Order Block / UNblock
Hi all,
Authorization for block/ubblock indicator
how can i do the roles for 2 users only can BLOCK / UNBLOCK the PO(purchse order)
where can i get this roles .. i have a role like MM01 purchaing.. how can i search for this option in that ROLE.
i there any way to search this. Authorization for block/ubblock indicator
Thanksin Advance,
Anthyodaya.
Edited by: anthyodaya Reddy Nagaram on Feb 16, 2010 6:02 PMHi Anthyodaya,
The user exit is the BAdI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST (shall be implemented via trs SE18), method PROCESS_ITEM.
This method receives only one parameter which is the PO item object. This object has many interesting methods you can use, among them GET_DATA to get the current item data on the screen (including the deletion flag), GET_PREVIOUS_DATA that gives you the flag store din the database. If they are different, then the user changed the flag and you can check his/her auth. to do this.
For this purpose you will probably need to define a custom auth. object.
To issue messages use the macro mmpur_message_forced and the method INVALIDATE() of the PO item object.
BR
Raf -
Diff between Block/unblock & mark for deletion of GL accounts
Can any one let me know the difference between Block/unblock & mark for deletion of GL accounts
Hi,
If you block a GL Account using transaction code FS00, the account is blocked for posting. No financial transactions can be posted to that account. We can unblock the GL Account at any time by clicking on unblock icon. Blocking can be done at Company Code level or at Chart of Accounts level.
For deleting or archiving the GL Master data it needs to be first marked for deletion and then delete it. This can also be done at Company Code level or at Chart of Accounts level.
You can also read the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/c7/a89dd243dd11d182b30000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Thanks
Murali. -
Need standard BAPI for Block/Unblock Customer
Hi All,
is there Standard BAPI for Customer Block/Unblock .
Thanks in Advance.Hi,
below is a useful link which gives a list of bapi's,
http://www.mysaphelp.com/blog/?p=122
look out for V02D Customer Master: Read/Block
might be of some Help...
Thanks,
Naren -
Any BTE/Exit for Block/ Unblock Revenue Recognition using VBREVEu2013REVPOBLCK
Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to block/unblock SD based Revenue Recognition by changing the value of VBREVEu2013REVPOBLCK in VA02/VA42 through any available user-exit/BTE. On input side I need VBAP and VBREVK structure to give the criteria for blocking and unblocking. Depends on the certain criteria I need to change the value of VBREVEu2013REVPOBLCK to block/unblock.
On analysis I found that there is a similar BTE 00503113 which is having similar interface except, it has VBREVE u2013RRSTA, but I need VBREVEu2013REVPOBLCK as export parameter.
Could you please suggest some BTE/Used exits that may help me for this scenario?
Waiting for your valuable inputs
<removed by moderator>
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jun 2, 2011 10:29 PMCreate an implementation in this BADI - BADI_SD_REV_REC_PODEV
In this case you have a changing parameter: rrpodevcust
depending on the condition, you just need to change rrpodevcust-REVPOBLCK to X.
Include the following
rrpodevcust-vbeln = iv_salesdoc_number.
rrpodevcust-posnr = iv_salesdoc_item.
append rrpodevcust TO ct_rrpodevcust.
check vbreve table and see if it updates the field. -
BLOCK/UNBLOCK GR/IR Account in Master Data
Team,
I Blocked at Company level GR/IR account to update open item management. After the program finished I went back and unblocked account, I am able to post directly to the account, however it appears that receiving was in teh middle of receiving goods and even after after the account is unblock they still get a message that account is blocked even though it shows unblocked in master data, at company level, chart of acounts level, I also went to tcode OB13 and chart of account is unblock as well.
Anyone has any idea is tehre is anotehr field I have to reset after this?
Thank You for you helpI was able to go into IMG bring the field " Only Balances in Local Currency" then went into account brought it to a "ZERO Balance" with TCODE FB50. Went into FS00 and updated field. Then reversed entry, and it works fine.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Page Validation - Function Returning Boolean - Check for NULL
I have 3 Page Validations which all fire on "When Button Pressed" = "Submit". <br><br> Number 1 is of type "Item specified is NOT NULL" for "P199_BUSINESS_UNIT1". <br> Number 2 is of type "Item specified is NOT NULL" for "P199_BUSINESS_UNIT2". <br> N
-
When saving a PDF from a FrameMaker book, is it possible to set document filenames as bookmarks in the PDF? Currently when I have a Framemaker book that I want to save as a PDF, I choose Save Book As and then choose PDF for the file format. A dialog
-
Mp3 device not showing up in finder
Hi Anyone. I have recently converted over to MAC. Really happy so far. Everything that i used on my PC has come over fine cameras etc. But i have a Samsung mp3 player. I know that itunes does not use anything other than ipod so i was hoping to just d
-
DVD Drive on Refurbed 1.3 Gig G4
The DVD drive on the machine I recieved today will not mount DVD's. It is telling me that the copy of 10.4 that I purchased is a blank DVD. I tried the DVD on a different machine, and it is not blank. It is telling me that my application DVD's aren't
-
Automatic clearing and manual clearing
Hello Gurus, I have created incoming invoice through SD. Then i did incoming payment through F-28. Even though customer was not cleared. after doing F-13 Customer has been cleared. How can we know whether there is need to run f-13?? In s