CVD Values Not Capturing in MIGO after Customs MIRO

Hi,
I am getting problem in Import procedure.
We created Import Purchase order as normal means Main Vendor in Foreign Currency and Customs Vendor in Indian Currency.We assigned same in PO.
After creating PO we did Customs MIRO in Indian Currency.
But at the time of Goods reciept System not defaulting BED(CVD) and E cess(e cess on CVd) and SHE(SHE on CVD)
but ADC is their.
In MIGO we entered Customs invoice Number.we are mentioned Excise default settings.We are using TAXINN.
ECC 6.SAP_APPL 11.
In my Import Pricing Procedure we are assigned Account key and accurals.
Please any body know the SNOTE number reply me.
Thankyou,
Raghu

Dear Raghu,
In case of Import I m facing problem.My base is coming wrong.
I am not getting the Value which I had entered in MIRO.
ADC isn't flowing.
In Imoprt pricing I have takne JADC & in Excise default I have maintained the condition also.
Can u p. tell me ,How did u resolve the problem ??
Regards
Biswajit

Similar Messages

CVD value not flowing in MIGO

We upgraded from 4.6C to ECC6.0.
We are facing the following problem during Import of material. The scenario is for INDIA.
1.     PO created for import. This PO has conditions for CVD (ZCV1) and Education cess (ZCVE). For both the conditions, excise credit can be taken afterwards. Vendors for these conditions are maintained as collectorate of customs
2.     Customs invoice is posted in MIRO
3.     Now we are going to MIGO to do Excise invoice (Bill of Entry) capture and goods receipt.
a.     Commercial invoice number entered
b.     In the MIGO screen, in Excise Item tab at item level, the Education cess values (entered previously in MIRO) are populated, but the CVD values are not populated(also entered previously in MIRO).
We have confirmed that in the SPRO node Maintain Excise Defaults, ZCV1 is maintained under CVD cond for tax procedure TAXINJ (we use tax procedure TAXINJ)
Can anybody give some clue about what might be going wrong ?

Hi
If you updated any patch in ECC6.0, there is some chance to happen like this. Better raise an OSS along with the patches you updated.
Regards
ARAS

JCV1 CVD values not capturing in BED while doing J1IEX

Hi,
I have done all settings which is required for Import po. I have created import po & then i have done miro for custom clearance. But when i am capturing the excise invoice the CVD amount not flows in the BED.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Anant Dalvi

Hi,
As you have define the material and chapter ID in J1ID also check whethere excise % is maintain or not for thta Chapter ID by selecting excise tax rate radio button in J1ID with proper validity period.
CVD amount % = Excise rate column in J1ID
ECESS = ECESS column in J1ID
SECESS = AT1 column % in J1ID.
because when you do MIRO conditions come in MIRO from PO delivery cost and in J1IEX it comes from PO and J1ID combination.
regards,
zafar

In dealer Invoice , Excise duty values not captured from MIGO

In dealer invoice , I have changed excise duty values in MIGO . This is not captured in MIRO. But the system took excise value from default values ( from FV11 condition record ) . This is happening for New plants. Old plants works good.
Regards.,
Lakshmanan.S

hi,
create a PO with zero tax code. such that base amount is equal to the inclusive of all excise duties.
IN migo select the capture and post excise option, in the excise tab, activate the mrp indicator .
change the base value in the migo and manually enter the excise duties in migo, capture it and then post
create MIRO with reference to the PO and give the taxcode as V1(ED-8%CESS-2%HECESS-1%)instead of VO(ZERO TAX CODE)
Regards,
velu

CVD & ADC not flowing into MIGO.

Hai all,
For the Import purchasing, i did the MIRO to capture the customs & CVD values. But while doing GR, CVD & ADC values are not flowing into MIGO ( it should be shown in BED & AED ) respectively. I have maintained this condition types JCV1 & JADC in Excise default settings also. Is there any notes are available for this error?. Please throw your lights

Hi,
Please check J1ID, whether we have maintained material and chapter id combination and cenvat determination. Secondly check the MIRO no. you are entering while doing MIGO. Sometimes it happen, that the miro number entered during MIGO different that of actual MIRO.
Ishu

Deemed export duty values not captured in ARE3 DOCUMENT

HELLO
I am testing for deemed export scenario against CT3 form
As per requirement condition values JEX2 /JECS/JA1Y are amintained zero in sales document
hence zero duty is captured in excise invoice
while creating ARE3 document through tcode:J1A301 the base amount and duty rate is captured.
but duty values are zero.
Pls guide how can we capture duty vales in ARE3 document.
Rgds Mugdha
Edited by: Mugdha Patil on Feb 25, 2011 7:10 AM

Dear Atul,
in Deemed export after doing commercial invoice - capture the excise details in j1iin and click whether you are doing are3 with Licence. the values has to be there it must not be zero. After that you have to capture ARE3 in j1ia301.
if the value is not flowing in j1iin then your customizing has some problem ie in TAX on goods movement the basic setting - determination on excise duty you must have not maintained the default conditions for excise in your TAXINN or TAXINJ procedure,
Try this and let us know
regards,,
Sudhir

Non Cenvatable material - Value not matching in MIGO and MIRO

Dear SAP experts!
We have the following problem.
We are using TAXINN.
We create a Purchase Order for a raw material, which is non cenvatable for a particular vendor.
When we carry out Goods Receipt, we change the Material type from Raw Material to Non Cenvatable in the Material Type in the Excise Item Tab and post the BED and AED values, the values are getting inventorized correctly.
And MIRO posting is also happening correctly. Both, MIGO and MIRO values are tallying. i.e, The total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, if we change any of the BED or AED value at the time of posting GR in the excise Invoice tab, then we are facing problem.
Value during MIGO posting is correct. That is the total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, During MIRO posting, the value of BED and AED is not getting picked.
The value during MIRO shows only Basic Price+CST and not BED amount and AED amount.
Can any one tell me, where it is going wrong.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthuraman.K

you have to used non deductable condition type in Taxinn to post tax to inventory
that is
JMIP IN: BED inventory % say 8%
JAIP IN AED inventory % Say 4 %
JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor 100 %
JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor 100%
and the above condition should be assigned to proper Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
And also u will have to assign condition type JMX2 and JAX2 in Maintain Excise Defaults
this will solve your issue

Excise Values not appearing in MIGO

Dear All,
We are using tax procedure TAXINN.
When I tried to create a GR doc with ref to a PO the excise values are not getting flown from my PO.
I tried both in MIGO as J1IEX, but the excise values are not getting flown.
Also please note that for the same PO we have done a GR during the month of Oct & at that time there was no problem & all the excise values was displayed in the GR doc.
Analysis done till now.
I have checked the Excise Default settings & I can see the JM0P codtn type maintained under the A/P BED condtn as well as the JE0P Ecess Condtn type maintained under the Ecess AP.
Also the values are there in the PO which was determined using the condtn records.
I have also checked the Excise group,plant, company code & Excise G/L determination settings in IMG & everything seems OK.
But still I am facing the Problem.
Is there anything which I have missed in the above analysis ?
Please suggest your val inputs to solve this issue.
Regards,

Hi SNB,
Thanks a lot for the reply.
As you suggested I havent maintained the condition records for the set off conditions such as JMX1, JEX1 etc..
When I maintained it the values got displayed.
Now I have One more query.
See earlier I have created PO's with out maintaining records for these set off conditions & at that time the values were displayed in MIGO.
So how the system worked at that time?
Also note that I havent maintained any of the set off conditions in the Excise defaults (Since these are just statistical condtn types) . Is it OK?
Also maintaining the set off condition with 100% is a must in TAXINN & Is it Possible to display the values in MIGO without maintaining the records for these condtn types?
Expecting your reply.
Regards,

Values not capture during adobe form display on pa30.

Hi Experts,
I have attached Adobe Form into Transaction PA30 in which form values are not capturing during form display,
But its displaying at the time of form generation on ZHINUREQ_CORRS_LETTER program.
Kindly give suggestion.
Regards,
Abdul

Hi Saujanya,
This could by caused by the network, the used browser or additional browser plugins. Try to do the following:
1. Test with an alternative browser (if you are on a SP which supports different browsers than IE, see PAM, http://service.sap.com/pam): If it works with Firefox, then you know the problem is caused by IE and not by the OS, network, ...
2. Deactivate/uninstall all additional browser plugins/add-ons (like google toolbar, Yahoo toolbar, ...)
3. Create a client trace as explained in SAP note 999998. Maybe there's a hint in the trace. Watch for something like "ERROR".
4. Install a HTTP sniffer (like "fiddler") on both machines and compare the network traffic. Maybe there's a request with a 4xx HTTP status code?
5. How is the machine connected to your network? Is it behind an additional webproxy?
Hope one of this helps,
Ralf

To stop preparation og MIGO before Customs MIRO in Import procurement

Hi,
Can anyone help me . I want to restrict preparation of GR before the Customs MIRO is prepared. Is there any settings or is there any way by which Gr will not be allowed t be prepared before customs Invoice is posted.
gautam

Hi
You can try it with badi MB_MIGO_BADI, methods CHECK_ITEM and CHECK_HEADER.
Regards
Eduardo

Add. duty of customs equivalent toBED(i.e. CVD)Value not going in exice reg

Hi
How the value will come in Add. duty of customs equivalent toBED(i.e. CVD) in excise RG23APart2 excise register?
Thanks

Hi Pari,
While creating the CVD tax Type put the Tax category of the same as CENVAT and then create the Tax type combination and then the Tax Code.
Now in the item master you need to classify the Item correctly i.e. Finished goods/Raw Materials/Capital Goods.
Now when you create the Excise Invoice for the item the relevant Excise Register should get updated.
Nagesh

Excise Invoice not captured in MIGO

Hi..
I am using TAXINN procedure in which I am using JMOP condition type for BED. In ME21N I am able to see the condition type and values for BED. and I maintained that I can capture the excise invoice at MIGO level.
But while creating MIGO The values are not picked up from the condition type. I have checked all the tax code (2 Tax code) combinations but in vain.
please tell me where is the problem...How the excise data flows from ME21N to MIGO.
Regards
Rahul

Hai,
Maintain the settings in
1.SPRO - IMG - Logistics general - India - Basic settings - Maintain excise defaluts - Maintain the Condition type in the columns for the Tax procdeure TAXINN.
2.SPRO - IMG - Logistics general - India - Basic settings - Condition based excise determination - Classsify condition types.
3.SPRO - IMG - Logistics general - India - Basic settings - Business transactions - Incoming excise invoices. here maintain 101 mvt type with registers.

Base Value not changing in MIGO Excise Tab

Dear Gururs,
We are using MIGO to capture & Post Excise Invoice for our Import PO (PO type ZIMP). the problem is, when we change the qty in MIGO Qty tab, corresponding base value is not getting update in Excise tab. Please suggest a solution.

Hi,
If you are doing a MIGO for Import consignment, duties are flow from Invoice booked thru MIRO, so doutful if you can change corresponding base value in MIGO.
Regards,
Vikas

Value not getting maintained even after maintain in some situations

hi experts,
we work on service contracts.
when a line item is entered, a value( iv_eos_i.) is set Yes/No depending on some custom logic in the line item level
this value is then maintained in the crmd_customer_i table using crm_customer_i_maintain_ow
but to my surprise, sometimes this value is blank even after maintain. This is not replicable while debugging
i tried commit work and wait , but client does not want this approach
Please suggest alternatives
Please anything...
please find the code
DATA: lt_input_fields          TYPE crmt_input_field_names_tab,
         ls_customer_i            TYPE crmt_customer_i_com,
         ls_input_fields          TYPE crmt_input_field_names.
*--Fill in CUSTOMER_I
   ls_customer_i-ref_guid           = is_orderadm_i-guid.
   ls_customer_i-zzew_lg_eos_date   = iv_eos_date.
   ls_customer_i-zzew_lg_eos_i      = iv_eos_i.
   ls_customer_i-mode               = gc_create.
*--Fill in Input Fields
   ls_input_fields-fieldname    = gc_eos_i.
* ls_input_fields-changeable   = gc_x.
   INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
   CLEAR ls_input_fields.
   ls_input_fields-fieldname = gc_eos_date.
   INSERT ls_input_fields INTO TABLE lt_input_fields.
   CLEAR ls_input_fields.
   CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_CUSTOMER_I_MAINTAIN_OW'
     EXPORTING
       is_customer_i_com          = ls_customer_i
*   IV_EXTERNAL_CALL           = gc_x
     CHANGING
       ct_input_field_names       = lt_input_fields
EXCEPTIONS
    item_change_error          = 1
    item_create_error          = 2
    error_occurred             = 3
    OTHERS                     = 4
   IF sy-subrc <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
*         WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
   ENDIF.
Thanks,
Sangeetha

Hi sangeetha ml,
Can you please let us know what the client doesnt want?
Only Commit work or any sort of commit FM?
Regards,
Ankita

Exicse base value not captured

Hello Gurus,
I have created an STO. Subsequently delivered, invoiced and excise invoice has been created. During GR though excise duties are appearing but its base value is not appearing. i.e. BED, ECS and HSECS are appearing correctly but its base value is 0.
How can I capture the excise base value along with all the excise duties in the GR through MIGO?
Thanks & Regards
Piyush

Hi,
Before GR capture the excise invoice using J1IEX. This may help you. Otherwise you will have to check the config settings.
Regards,
Vishesh

CVD Values Not Capturing in MIGO after Customs MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for