DAQ counter output

I want to give out a counter signal on a PCI 6025
I tried to do this with DAQmx.
I was able to realize such a signal, but thre is only the possibility (within the DAQ assistent) to give andless signal, or a adjustabke number of signal, or only one signal.
My problem is, when I use the endless signal, I cant do anything else on my simulation, it only makes the signal.
The same problem with the adjustable number of signal. I have to wait until these signals are given before I can to anything else.
With only one signal I have the problem that I takes time until my next signal is given out, and so the counter output is not continuous.
Anybody here who knows a solution?

Hi Thorsten24,
which developement enviroment do you use? LabVIEW, LabWindows/CVI or Measurement Studio? Which version?
Generally the assistant locks your system for only one DAQ-application. If you want to do something else meanwhile (e.g. parallel pulsetrain generation and analog input) you have to program it by yourself using DAQmx without the assistant.
You can use the EXAMPLE FINDER to search suited examples for your needs. Take a look in the following folders:
DAQmx/counter/generate pulse
DAQmx/synchronization/multi-function
Norbert B.
NI Germany
CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
Expert: Geometry
Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.

Similar Messages

Can I generate pulse trains on more than one counter output at the same time?

I have a PCI 6601 card with a BNC 2121 to connect the signals to two devices. The card is used as a trigger for both devices and I want to be able to generate pulse trains on two output channels at the same time, with a time delay between the two. How do I do that in Labview 7.1 Development with DAQmx?

I feel foolish for not being able to figure this out, but it still doesn't work. Attached is the VI I use now. Counter 0 generates a finite pulse train and I programmed Counter 1 to generate a retriggerable single pulse triggered by CtrOinternaloutput. I still get the same error message: -50103 The specified resource is reserved. The operation could not be completed as specified.
The same happens if I set the trigger for counter 1 at PFI36 (default output of counter 0) or any other PFI line. If I try a pulse train generation on only one of the counters, both work fine.
If I try the example in traditional DAQ for multiple counter outputs with phase delay, it works fine.
Can you tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Attachments:
Shutter_AND_lamp_trigger.vi ‏103 KB

Counter Output/Counter Input PXI Signals Behaving Erratically

Question for all your LabVIEW guru's out there,
I am running a frequency loopback test using the NI PXI 6229 MIO DAQ card. I am generating a "Counter Output" pulse train signal which feeds through my device under test and then back out of my device under test and back into the PXI 6229 for a "Counter Input" frequency measurement. Both the "Counter Output" and the "Counter Input" are assigned different PFI lines using DAQmx in LabVIEW.
I have 4 lines to test on my DUT. All four lines run this same frequency measurement but with different PFI lines on the PXI 6229. Each line is test independently.
This is my setup for the 4 lines:
Path 1: P2.0 (Counter Output - Pulse Train) -> DUT (Device Under Test) -> P2.1 (Counter Input - Frequency Measurement)
Path 2: P2.2 (Counter Output - Pulse Train) -> DUT (Device Under Test) -> P2.3 (Counter Input - Frequency Measurement)
Path 3: P2.4 (Counter Output - Pulse Train) -> DUT (Device Under Test) -> P2.5 (Counter Input - Frequency Measurement)
Path 4: P2.6 (Counter Output - Pulse Train) -> DUT (Device Under Test) -> P2.7 (Counter Input - Frequency Measurement)
where:
P2.0 = PFI8
P2.1 = PFI9
P2.2 = PFI10
P2.3 = PFI11
P2.4 = PFI12
P2.5 = PFI13
P2.6 = PFI14
P2.7 = PFI15
I have a LabVIEW VI which generates the "Counter Output" and reads the "Counter Input" frequency. I am seeing weird behavior from the PXI 6229 card. I can test "Path 1" and "Path 2" and the frequency I read is what I generated. No issue there. However, when I test "Path 3" and "Path 4" the frequency measurement is erratic. The readings are two different frequencies repeated over and over again and none of those frequencies are the expected frequency which was generated out of the "Counter Output." If I reset the card, and start by testing "Path 3" and "Path 4" the frequency readings are correct and the erratic behavior is gone. However, when I try to then test "Path 2" and "Path 1" now those lines have the erratic frequency issue. I can continue resetting the card and see same issue. The PFI lines that I test first will always pass.
To summarize:
Steps Taken:
1. Test Path 1 = SUCCESS
2. Test Path 2 = SUCCESS
3. Test Path 3 = Erratic Frequency (Two Frequencies repeated over and over again in my frequency results array)
4. Test Path 4 = Erratic Frequency (Two Frequencies repeated over and over again in my frequency results array)
5. Reset the PXI 6229 Card
6. Test Path 3 = SUCCESS
7. Test Path 4 = SUCCESS
8. Test Path 3 = Erratic Frequency (Two Frequencies repeated over and over again in my frequency results array)
9. Test Path 4 = Erratic Frequency (Two Frequencies repeated over and over again in my frequency results array)
I am wondering if Port 2 (P2.0-P2.7) on the 6229 card has certain dependecies and this is why I am seeing issues. I am trying to get around this issue so that I don't have to always reset the card.
Are P2.0-P2.3 (PFI8-PFI11) and P2.4-P2.7 (PFI12-PFI15) treated differently or require different setup? How do I resolve this issue?
Thanks so much!

I have a theory...
The DAQ card follows a policy called "lazy uncommit" wherein the terminal used for the output will continue to be connected to the counter even after the task has completed (until the terminal is needed for something else). So as you run more tests, the counter output will end up driving more lines. This behavior should be easy enough to confirm.
As the DAQ card drives more lines, I'd imagine this affects the actual signal. You could scope it to check, but it sounds like either the rise/fall times are becoming longer or some extra noise is being introduced on the line.
The readings are two different frequencies repeated over and over again and none of those frequencies are the expected frequency which was generated out of the "Counter Output."
This implies you are picking up an extra edge during transitions--this isn't too uncommon if the signal is noisy since there is no built-in hysteresis on the DAQ card. I would expect the measured frequencies to have periods that sum to either the full period or the semi-period of your actual signal (depending on how many duplicate edges are detected).
Suggestions are as follows:
To stop the DAQ card from driving multiple PFI lines, it would probably be easiest to just programmatically reset the device in between your tests (using DAQmx Reset Device). If you can't reset the device (e.g. because you are running some other task that can't be interrupted) then you can instead configure a dummy task that uses the PFI line in question as an input.
To stop the DAQ card from picking up multiple edges during transitions, you should configure a digital filter on the input terminals. If you reset the device it sounds like this might not be necessary... it's up to you if you want to configure this or not.
Best Regards,
John Passiak

How to disable (turn off) a counter output

I have a similar question up on the the board but I thought I would ask it in another way to make it simple and straightforward.
Can an E-series counter output be disabled (and enabled) quickly through some software command? When I say " disabled" I mean switched off to a TTL low state. I have tried both the "disable" counter control command and gating the counter with a TTL signal. Both methods leave the output pin in whatever state the output happens to be in at the time of the command or gating. I need a disable function where "disabled" automatically sets an OFF or LOW on the output. I am using this to generate a pulse train where the pulse train switches off at certain times, and I cannot have the output remain high at these times.
I am using traditional DAQ but if there is a method in DAQmx that works I'd be willing to try it...

Have you tried using the following vi with a reset command (search in help, it works with the E series counters)
Counter Control
This VI controls groups of counters. Control operations include starting, stopping, and setting the state of active acquisitions. This VI works with DAQ-STC and NI-TIO-based devices.
Control code 1 (reset) reinitializes the counter back to the default settings.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please help with C code to synchronize counter output to analog input

Hi All,
I am using NI DAQ USB-6353 with text-based C code to control it. I would like to send a continuous pulse train from the DAQ to pulse a power supply, which then activates an electron beam producing current to be read by the analog input port of the same DAQ. I would like to keep only the analog samples during the pulse peak and samples of a couple pulse widths right after. I am successfully to generate a pulse train using the sampled clock from a counter output channel, but fail to use the same clock to synchronize the pulse train with the analog input. DAQmxReadAnalogF64 is not called by the static function EveryNCallback set for the analog input task. Am I doing something wrong with the following codes? It would be great if it turns out only I am using the wrong sampled clock name of the counter ("dev1/PFI8") for the analog input. Or is something more fundamental that a counter cannot be sync. with an analog input?
Would someone be able to send me a link to an example in C or C++ or visual basic showing how to synchronize a buffered sample clocked digital pulse train from a counter output channel to an analog input? To simplify the post, the below codes do not include the static functions EveryNCallback and DoneCallBack, but I can send them if needed.
Many thanks in advance for your help,
Thuc Bui
//setting operation parameters
double initDelay = 0.0, freq = 10;
double dutyCycle = 0.0001;           //thus pulse width is 10 microsec
unsigned highTicks = 4;   //per period
unsigned numSamplesPerPeriod = highTicks / dutyCycle; //40000 samples/period
unsigned lowTicks = numSamplesPerPeriod - highTicks;      //per period
unsigned sampleRate = 2*numSamplesPerPeriod*freq;       //800000 samples/s
//create counter
TaskHandle counterTask;
int errCode = DAQmxCreateTask("", & counterTask);
errCode = DAQmxCreateCOPulseChanFreq(counterTask, "dev1/ctr0", "",
                                 DAQmx_Val_Hz, DAQmx_Val_Low,
                                 initDelay, freq, dutyCycle);
errCode = DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(counterTask, "dev1/PFI8", sampleRate, DAQmx_Val_Rising,
                           DAQmx_Val_ContSamp, numSamplesPerPeriod);
//create analog input
TaskHandle aiTask;
double minVolt = 0.0, maxVolt = 1.0;
errCode = DAQmxCreateAIVoltageChan(aiTask, "dev1/ai0", "", DAQmx_Val_Diff,
                                 minVolt, maxVolt, DAQmx_Val_Volts, "");
unsigned bufferSize = 10* numSamplesPerPeriod;
errCode = DAQmxSetBufInputBufSize(aiTask, bufferSize);
errCode = DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(aiTask, "dev1/PFI8", sampleRate, DAQmx_Val_Rising, DAQmx_Val_ContSamp, numSamplesPerPeriod);
errCode = DAQmxRegisterEveryNSamplesEvent(aiTask, DAQmx_Val_Acquired_Into_Buffer,
                                        numSamplesPerPeriod, 0, EveryNCallback, 0);
errCode = DAQmxRegisterDoneEvent(aiTask, 0, DoneCallBack, 0)
//start aiTask first
errCode = DAQmxStartTask(aiTask);
//then counterTask
errCode = DAQmxStartTask(counterTask);

Hi Xavier,
Thank you very much for getting back to me. I really appreciate it. I followed your advice with the option 2 and simplified my code by using one of the NI C example templates to generate the below codes (also attached). I was able to see the pulses generated with an oscilloscope, and on the same oscilloscope I could see the ouput pulses of the electron beam probe. Unfortunately, the below code via DAQmxReadAnalogF64 reports of no data read from the probe and finally times out. Below is the error message given by this function. I did check the connection of the analog input wires to make sure they were connected to pin 1 (A0+) and 2 (A0-) because I was using the terminal configuration DAQmx_Val_Diff. Do you see any obvious errors I have made in my codes?
Thanks a lot for your help,
Thuc Bui
Task started, waiting for trigger...
Acquired 0 analog samples DAQmx Error: Some or all of the samples requested have not yet been acquired.
To wait for the samples to become available use a longer read timeout or read later in your program. To make the samples available sooner, increase the sample rate. If your task uses a start trigger, make sure that your start trigger is configured correctly. It is also possible that you configured the task for external timing, and no clock was supplied. If this is the case, supply an external clock.
Property: DAQmx_Read_RelativeTo
Corresponding Value: DAQmx_Val_CurrReadPos
Property: DAQmx_Read_Offset
Corresponding Value: 0
Task Name: _unnamedTask<1>
Status Code: -200284
End of program, press Enter key to quit
********************** C Code **************************************************
#include <stdio.h>
#include "NIDAQmx.h"
#include <math.h>
#define DAQmxErrChk(functionCall) { if( DAQmxFailed(error=(functionCall)) ) { goto Error; } }
int main(void) {
int32 error = 0;
char errBuff[2048]={'\0'};
TaskHandle taskHandleDig=0;
TaskHandle taskHandleAna=0;
double  timeout=10;
double minVol = -1.0, maxVol = 1.0;
double initDelay = 0.0;
double freq = 10.0;
double pulseWidth = 1.0e-5; //10us
double dutyCycle = pulseWidth * freq;
unsigned hiTicks = 4;
double sampleRate = hiTicks/pulseWidth; //samples/s
unsigned lowTicks = ceil(sampleRate/freq) - hiTicks;
unsigned nSpPeriod = hiTicks + lowTicks;
unsigned numPulses = 1;
unsigned nSpCh = numPulses*nSpPeriod;
double sampleRate2 = ceil(2.0*sampleRate);
unsigned sampleMode = DAQmx_Val_FiniteSamps;
/*********************************************/ /*/ DAQmx Configure Code /*********************************************/
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCreateTask("", &taskHandleDig)); DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCreateTask("", &taskHandleAna));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCreateAIVoltageChan(taskHandleAna, "Dev2/ai0", "", DAQmx_Val_Diff, minVol, maxVol, DAQmx_Val_Volts, ""));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(taskHandleAna, "/Dev2/Ctr0InternalOutput", sampleRate2, DAQmx_Val_Rising, sampleMode, nSpCh));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCreateCOPulseChanFreq(taskHandleDig, "Dev2/ctr0", "", DAQmx_Val_Hz, DAQmx_Val_Low, initDelay, freq, dutyCycle));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxCfgSampClkTiming(taskHandleDig, "/Dev2/PFI12", sampleRate2, DAQmx_Val_Rising, sampleMode, nSpCh));
unsigned bufferSize = nSpCh;
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxSetBufInputBufSize(taskHandleAna, bufferSize));
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxSetBufOutputBufSize(taskHandleDig, bufferSize));
/*********************************************/ /*/ DAQmx Write Code /*********************************************/
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxWriteCtrTicksScalar(taskHandleDig, 0, timeout, hiTicks, lowTicks, NULL));
/*********************************************/ /*/ DAQmx Start Code /*********************************************/
DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxStartTask(taskHandleAna)); DAQmxErrChk(DAQmxStartTask(taskHandleDig));
printf("Task started, waiting for trigger...\n");
/*********************************************/ /*/ DAQmx Read Code /*********************************************/
double* dataAna = new double[nSpCh];
int32 numReadAna = 0;
int errCode = DAQmxReadAnalogF64(taskHandleAna, -1, timeout, DAQmx_Val_GroupByChannel, dataAna, nSpCh, &numReadAna, NULL);
printf("Acquired %d analog samples\n",numReadAna);
if (numReadAna) {
    unsigned nPts = (numReadAna < hiTicks)? numReadAna : hiTicks;
   for (unsigned n = 0; n < nPts; ++n) {
         printf("%6.3f ", dataAna[n]);
    printf("\n");
delete [] dataAna;
DAQmxErrChk(errCode);
Error:
if( DAQmxFailed(error) )   DAQmxGetExtendedErrorInfo(errBuff,2048);
if( taskHandleDig!=0 && taskHandleAna!=0 ) {
/*********************************************/   /*/ DAQmx Stop Code   /*********************************************/
    DAQmxStopTask(taskHandleDig);
    DAQmxClearTask(taskHandleDig);
    DAQmxStopTask(taskHandleAna);
    DAQmxClearTask(taskHandleAna);
if( DAQmxFailed(error) )   printf("DAQmx Error: %s\n",errBuff);
printf("End of program, press Enter key to quit\n");
getchar();
return 0;
Attachments:
Correlated DIO AI_Sample_Clock Dig Start.c ‏6 KB

Setting the counter output mastertimebase divider?

Hello
I want to output single short pulses with varying pauses. My MuFu DAQ card has 20 MHz master clock rate and 24 bit counter (Good ol'6052E). When I try to output 1 µs with a pause duration of more than 839 ms, I get an error due to mismatch of clockrate and counter bit size with short and long duration. This is explained in great detail in the corresponding help:
2/ counter clock rate <= X <= 2^24 / counter clock rate. with counter clock rate = master clock rate / divider
0.1 µs <= X <= 16777215 / 20Mhz = 839 ms
I could strech my limits by manually setting the CO.CounterTimebaseMasterTimebaseDivider to 10. But I've searched all property nodes I could find but I have not found this property.
Does anyone know where it is hidden, and to which values it can be set?
Thank you
Michael

Hi Michael,
Unfortunately that property doesn't exist. There are a few "Divisor" properties available for other subsystems (e.g. see Analog Input timing block diagram below).
However, you'll notice in the above diagram that the valid divisors of the master timebase are only 1 or 200 (which then gives the AI Sample Clock Timebase). You can get similar behavior on the counter by specifying to use the 20 MHz timebase or 100 kHz timebase for your source. However, using the 100 kHz (1/10 us) timebase is going to prevent you from properly generating the narrow 1 us pulses that you require.
So, you can use 20 MHz or 100 kHz without any additional resources, but 100 kHz wouldn't allow you to have a 1 us pulse, and 20 MHz won't let you have a high or low time of greater than ~839 ms. You could generate frequencies in between these to use as the counter timebase (either use the frequency output or use the second counter to generate the desired frequency, or perhaps configure a dummy analog task) but of course there would always be a tradeoff between the resolution of the pulse and the maximum time between pulses.
If you do have the 2nd counter available, here is my suggestion to get the best of both worlds:
1. Configure a counter output to generate a pulse every N seconds (I suggest configuring the output to generate at 1/N frequency at 50% duty cycle). When you configure this counter, DAQmx will choose an appropriate timebase for you. When N is less than ~1.67 seconds, DAQmx will use the 20 MHz timebase (since both the high and low time would be under the 839 ms). When N is > 1.67 seconds but below ~335 seconds, DAQmx will use the 100 kHz timebase. If you intend on modifying the rate of the output (to something above 1.67 seconds) after the task has started you would need to make sure to specify to use the 100 kHz timebase rather than relying on the DAQmx default. You can't use a built-in timebase if you want to generate a delay greater than 335 seconds, but if you wanted to you could handle this case by checking for it and configuring the frequency output to generate an even lower timebase.
2. To generate the actual output signal, configure a retriggerable single pulse generation to be triggered off of the signal generated above. This signal will be based off of the 20 MHz timebase (assuming you configure a pulse width less than ~839 ms) and so will give you a good resolution on the available pulse widths that you can generate.
In summary, doing this would let you decouple the resolution of your generated pulse width from the resolution of the delay between the pulses. The downside is that it uses two counters.
The other option which I previously mentioned (and what you were asking about) would be to find a timebase that meets the two requirements: 1) fast enough to generate a narrow pulse and 2) slow enough to not roll-over between pulses. You have 100 kHz and 20 MHz available to you, but you can generate intermediate frequencies using the frequency output. If you plan on using a counter to generate the timebase instead, you should consider the other option which decouples the two counters.
Of course, using a device with a higher counter resolution (most newer DAQ devices use 32-bit counters) would probably also resolve your issue depending on the full range of delays that you need. The downside here is the cost of new hardware.
Best Regards,
John Passiak

DAQmx gate counter output

Hello,
I am trying to convert an existing legacy application developed in LabVIEW 6 (Traditional DAQ) into LabVIEW 2012 (DAQmx). The operation requires generating one counter output that is gated by another counter output. I have attached a fully functional example using Traditional DAQ. In the example you can see the Carrier Frequency output (4550 Hz or 5525 Hz) is generated by Counter 1. The counter Gate Frequency is generated by Counter 0. Counter 1 output is now gated by Counter 0 output in which you end up with bursts of the Carrier Frequency at a rate set by the Gate Frequency (from 3 to 21.5 Hz). This works fine but I cannot replicate this in DAQmx. The DAQ board I am using is an NI DAQCard-6062E (in a PCMCIA Slot).
Any sugestions are appreciated.
Thank You,
Mike Westgate
Attachments:
Traditional DAQ Counter Gate Output.zip ‏32 KB

Hi Mike,
I wasn't able to properly look at your code since I have not install the Traditional DAQmx (Legacy) driver yet.
But I do have the following links that can help you in transition from Traditional DAQ to DAQmx:
Answers to Frequently Asked Questions about NI-DAQmx and Traditional NI-DAQ (Legacy)
Transition from Traditional NI-DAQ to NI-DAQmx in LabVIEW
Ee Lim
See that button on the left side of this post...
If you feel my post is helpful, all you need is just (at most) 2 seconds to click that button, to show your appreciation. Thank you~~

Counter Output

Hello
I am using DAQ PCI 6221 card for analog inputs and outputs, I am using both the counter outputs for controlling temperature, by putting heaters On and Off through the digital pulse train I am getting from counter outputs.
But I am having a problem with the counters that even if I change the Low time and High Time the pulse I get just dont changes accordingly,
changes timing effects from next time when I run the VI, I am attaching the VIs(CTR1.vi and CTR0.vi are similar just change the channel name) involved in this, first I am acquiring the temperature and then comparing it with low and high limits and taking an action whether to On or Off heaters.
High Time and Low time are required because as soon as I reach near to set temperature I increase the Low time and vice versa.
Could anybody please tell me where I am wrong??
Attachments:
Show Alarm SV.vi ‏14 KB
CTR1.vi ‏37 KB
Dig Pulses2.vi ‏117 KB

Are you trying to change these values once the task has started running? Consult this KB for information on how to do to this:
"Why Can't I Change the Duty Cycle on My Continuous Pulse Train?"
To summarize, you'll need to use DAQmx channel property nodes to set the pulse width and frequency.
Elijah Kerry
Senior Product Manager, LabVIEW
Follow my Software Engineering for LabVIEW Blog

Disconnect counter output line

Hello,
I have a question that has been bothering me for awhile. I'm using an M-series DAQ card which allows the ctr0 output to be placed on any PFI line. Is there any way to disconnect the ctr0 output from all the PFI lines? I'm only using the ctr0InternalOutput and I don't want it routed to an external pin.
The reason I ask is because the ctr0InternalOutput was being used as timing for several acquisitions, but the output was also appearing on it's default output pin. However, this DIO/PFI line was being used as a digital output for relay control and every time the counter was used, the relay would switch. I "fixed" it by routing the counter output to an unused PFI line, but I would like it not to appear externally at all.
Thank you for your help,
Jon

Thanks, I will give that a try. Seems so obvious now...
Jon

Two counter outputs with 90deg phaseshift

Hi,
I have NI PXI-1042 chassis and two NI PXI-6513 digital output cards in it.
Task is to create two pulses with 90degrees phaseshift.
Is there function in labview 7.1 which generates pulses descriped above. I`m meaning that if I tell function to count up, signal A is ahead signal B and if A is 90 degrees behind B it means counting down?
Is there way to do this by connecting 3 (signal A, signal B and GND) counter wires all in one counter and controlling only one counter to "count output down" or "Count output up"?
- Santtu

Hi Santtu,
I think I understand what you are trying to do.
Essentially you have two counters, but you want to be able to control their
phase relationship to one another. This is definitely possible to do;
however, there are not many examples dealing with it.
I did find one Traditional DAQ Example (non- M-Series) that
might help you out with this: Twin
Pulse Train Generation with Variable Phase Shift Control
Traditional DAQ uses an older API, so I would recommend you look at the
attached example over this example. Just wanted to give you more
than one option.
As far as it 'counting' up or down, that really would have
to be done by a counter input task. Since the input would be the same as
that for a quadrature encoder, then you would use the methods described in my
previous post. As the output it will simply look like two different
counters.
For the best solution though, I went ahead and created an
example for you. It shows how to generate 2 different counter pulses that
are out of phase with one another by a specified amount of time.
Hope this helps,
Otis
Training and Certification
Product Support Engineer
National Instruments
Attachments:
Gen Dig Pulse Train-Continuous-Dig Start-Phase Shift.vi ‏82 KB

DAQmx: 2 Counter Outputs in 1 Task?

Is it possible to have two counter outputs with different timings in one task?
One counter will be used to generate a PWM pulse train and the other one will be used to re-arm the trigger for analog data acquisition.
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
Thank you for posting to the NI forums. You should be able to output on two counters with separate timing sources. I’ve done just this using an M Series DAQ device and the DAQ Assistant’s auto-generated LabVIEW code. The screenshot to this VI is attached below.
I hope this helps. Please post back if you have further questions.
Ed W.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
Message Edited by Ed W on 01-26-2007 01:50 PM
Message Edited by Ed W on 01-26-2007 01:50 PM
Message Edited by Ed W on 01-26-2007 01:51 PM
Attachments:
Two Counters.JPG ‏56 KB

Pause the counter output in DAQmx

Hi~
I used two counters output on PCI-6602 card in LV7.1 to generate a PWM to control the velocity of two motors that control the position of mechanism.(Encoder was set on the motor.)
When I set the same duty cycle in two counters, the position of two mechanisms were different(Two mechanisms were the same),that means one velocity of motor was fast, the other was slow.
May I pause the counter output of the fast motor to wait the slow motor??
====================
●LV Version：LabVIEW7.1
●OS：WindowsXP(SP1)
●Hardware：PCI-7344, PCI-6602, PCMCIA 6024E

Assuming you're using DAQmx, you can set up a Pause Trigger for each of the counters. (A similar function can be done in traditional NI-DAQ too). You could, for example, configure 2 different digital bits to be used to pause the 2 PWM counters independently. The way 'Pause Triggering' works is that the counter's pulsetrain only goes to the output pin when the pause trigger signal is in the correct logic state. This can be set to be low or high by programming.
You may also want to characterize the speed difference of your actuators, and give them correspondingly proportional PWM duty cycles. That would do a better job of keeping them in sync throughout the motion.
A feedback signal would give you even better options for control.
-Kevin P.

Two counter inputs and counter output NI 9401

I am trying to configure two counter inputs and one counter output on one NI 9401. I have looked and found how to configure digital lines in booth directions but it seems like I can only do two counters in all on one module. Can someone verify this for me or let me know how to get all three on to one module?
Thank you

Hi mschoenwald,
The counters are actually located on the backplane of whatever chassis you are using--I'll assume you are using cDAQ and not cRIO.
If you have the older <link no longer exists>, then there are only 2 counters available in general. You can access both from a single parallel (8 lines or less) digital module in slot 5 or 6 of the chassis.
The 2nd generation Compact DAQ chassis (including 9174, 9178, 9181, 9188, etc.) includes 4 counters. You may access them from any slot with a parallel module. There is no restriction preventing you from accessing all 4 simultaneously from a single module.
The 9401 is bi-directional and configurable by nibble (line0:3 may be configured one direction, and line4:7 another). However, it is quirky in that it requires the line direction to be configured before any of the tasks are started. This is because the data lines themselves are used to set the line direction behind the scenes. The best way to work around the behavior is to use DAQmx Control Task to explicitly reserve your tasks before any of them are started (see here). Keep in mind that the counter output should use the opposite nibble from the two counter input tasks.
Best Regards,
John Passiak

Change default terminal for Counter Output

hello,
I am using a DAQ-6251. I am trying to change the default output terminal (CTR0) for a counter signal but am having trouble with this because I am extremely new to labview. Could anyone tell me how to do this?
Thanks,
Bilog1198

Hello Bilog,
Us the DAQmx Channel Property Node, and your property of interest would be Counter Output,Pulse,Output Terminal
Regards,
Glenn
Message Edited by ManLongAtNI on 06-18-2009 04:07 PM
Regards,
Glenn

How to filter starttrigger on counter output precisely

HW PCI6602
Measurement studio 2008 (C#)NI-DAQmx 9.02I’m trying to trig a camera using the output from a counter.
The camera should be trigged when the counter input pulse width is larger than approx (filterPulseWidth 10us).To do this a have set up the following tasktask.COChannels.CreatePulseChannelTime(counter, "TriggerTaskChannel", COPulseTimeUnits.Seconds, COPulseIdleState.Low, 0, 80E-6, 0.007); task.Triggers.StartTrigger.Type = StartTriggerType.DigitalEdge; task.Triggers.StartTrigger.DigitalEdge.Edge = DigitalEdgeStartTriggerEdge.Rising; task.Triggers.StartTrigger.Retriggerable = true;task.Triggers.StartTrigger.DigitalEdge.DigitalFilterMinimumPulseWidth = filterPulseWidth; task.Triggers.StartTrigger.DigitalEdge.DigitalFilterEnable = true;Unfortunatly this filter has the following behaviour”If the period of the filter clock timebase is tfltrclk, this filter guarantees topass pulse widths that are 2*tfltrclk or longer and to block pulse widths thatare tfltrclk or shorter. A pulse with a width between these two ranges may ormay not pass, depending on the phase of the pulse with respect to the filterclock timebase”.It means that I have no sharp distinction on my filter as one would when applying a filter to an ordinary pulse width measuring task. Implementing this with via the software in a callback is to slow.The bottom line is that I would like to generate a pulse on my counter output when the trigger/counter input is greater than say 10us. The output pulse could be predetermind as in the sample code above or as long as the filtered input (I.e counter just pass filtered input to my output).How can this be done? BR
Jongas
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi Jongas,
Is it OK if the trigger is sent once the pulse hits 10 us, rather than
on the exact falling edge? I'll assume the exact timing isn't as important, but you would like the trigger to occur very close to the falling edge (within a couple of us). The important thing is that we trigger as close as possible to when the PWM has hit 50% duty cycle.
Some brainstorming:
Digital Filtering on the 660x Isn't the Best for This:
Digital filtering might not be as practical here on your 6602 due to the region of uncertainty between 5 and 10 (or 10 and 20) us pulses. The TIO boards count two consecutive edges of a filter clock to determine when to pass a signal through so the guaranteed rejected pulse width is always half of your guaranteed passed pulse width (providing an external filter clock timebase that is synchronized with your external signal could potentially reduce this uncertainty but I honestly haven't tried this before and I would imagine it is not going to be very straightforward).
X Series Alternative:
Our X Series devices use a different method of digital filtering that would work better for you. If a hardware change is an option (and you can use PCIe) then you might consider this. You could use the 20 MHz timebase as your filter clock timebase and could guarantee to pass 10 us (200/20M) and reject 9.95 us (201/20M). The 6320 is currently our lowest cost X Series board. A couple of points about this solution:
1. To configure the PFI filter, you need to use some sort of dummy task to
access the property nodes. Here is an
example of this (although it is written in LabVIEW).
2. You can route the filtered PFI signal to be exported on another PFI line, but this will reserve Counter 3. This is documented in the Device Routes tab of Measurement and Automation Explorer.
3. The filtered output will be 9.95-10 us delayed from the input signal, so you could trigger the camera off of the rising edge of the filtered output directly and be fairly close to the actual falling edge.
External AND Gate Alternative:
You could configure a Counter Output to generate a re-triggerable pulse with a 10 us initial delay (to be triggered off of the rising edge of your PWM signal). Assuming the pulse is short enough to complete before the next period of your PWM signal, the counter output would only be high at the same time as the PWM signal if the signal was longer than 10 us. Use the external AND gate to combine these two signals and the result would be the trigger for your camera (the rising edge would correspond to 10 us after the PWM signal first goes high).
If you wanted to you could make the counter output pulse a little longer (say 8 us) and trigger the camera off of the falling edge out of the AND gate (a.k.a. rising edge out of a NAND gate) which would line up with the exact falling edge of the PWM signal. Don't make the CO pulse too long or it will overlap with the next period of the PWM.
Another Idea:
One idea that I keep coming back to is to use the internal rollover event of a counter input task (a pulse is generated whenever a counter rolls over on its Internal Output which can be routed to a PFI line). I don't think this will work, but the idea in theory would be to:
1. Set Default state to known value (e.g. 2^32-200).
2. Gate the Counter so it only counts during the time PWM is high. Have it count the 20 MHz timebase.
3. Reset the Counter to default state on the falling edge of the PWM signal.
4. The counter would rollover if 200 pulses occurred of the 20 MHz timebase (10 us), and the Counter Output could be routed to a PFI line to trigger the camera.
The problem is that there is no good way to reset the counter except for an encoder measurement (Kevin has already made a nice suggestion about this). A Pulse Width Measurement would technically reset the counter, but you cannot currently set the default value of a Pulse Width Measurement task so there is no way to make the rollover happen prematurely).
Configuring an encoder measurement and working with the multiple counters on the 6602 to produce appropriate A,B, and Z signals might be a method to look into further, but at this point I think you'd be better off with an external AND gate.
I don't want to say it's impossible with just the 6602, but I can't think of a straightforward way to go about it without external hardware (although maybe I can sleep on it and think of something later... how many counters do you have to work with?).
With your current NI Hardware, I think your best bet is to go with an external AND gate. If you're planning on purchasing an X Series card the digital filtering idea is actually not a bad way to go.
I hope this is helpful!
Best Regards,
John Passiak

DAQ counter output

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for