Daq with PocketPC any speed limit ??

Hi ! HELP NEEDED !!!
i need to sample 12 chanels with 16ksamples/s ....
so its something like ... 200,000 ksamles/s ...
and make some Min/Max calculations ...
i want to use it with the PocketPC and the Daq 6024E .. and ofcourse LabView 7 ...
the speet limit of daq .. is 200,000 ks/s .. so its ok ..
but what PocketPC speed i need ??? (200Mhz, 300Mhz, 400Mhz) ... and if its actually possible to sample this speed on the PocketPC aplication ....
anybody tried ???
any body worked near the limits ???
what amount of memory needed ??? 64 mb enought ??
anybody ?? plz ??? :-)
its too pity to buy and to find that its not working ...
u can answere also to [email protected]

200KS/s on the 6024E should work fine on 200Mhz StrongARM and 400Mhz XScale CPUs. 200/300Mhz XScales will probably not be fast enough. You will need to download the 7.0f1 patch for LabVIEW and the PDA module to get this level of performance (and to support multichannel).
Due to various factors from both Windows CE and LabVIEW PDA, using the high-level multichannel acquisition VIs in a default PDA install you should expect to be able to acquire somewhere around 10s of contiguous data at 200KS/s. This can be improved to 50s by various means including a lower-level usage of the DAQ driver code. If you require continuous acquisition, this is achievable but more difficult to program, and may not be able to operate stably at 200KS/s.
If you need more information a
bout said lower-level programming please msg me privately.

Similar Messages

A browser with download speed limit?

It sounds weird but on Linux I can't find a browser that allows to set a download speed limit.
I found an extension for Firefox but it works only on Windows.
I know the existence of download managers like d4x, wget, jdownloader, etc... but some downloads can only be done by browser.
I know trickle too but if I want to change the speed limit I have to 'restart' the command (interrupting the current download).
Then I didn't find an extension for Chromium.

I was able to implement [global] throttling with wondershaper. You will need to modprobe sch_cbq if you use the CBQ script (not sure about the HTB one). I use the CBQ version.

My itunes radio rebuffers every 8 seconds - is there any fix or help for this problem. I am running the latest itunes on a new Mac with 4MB download speed.

My itunes radio rebuffers every 8 seconds - is there any fix or help for this problem. I am running the latest itunes on a new Mac with 4MB download speed.

You need to update your Mac OS to at least 10.5.8.
Itunes 10+ requires Mac OS 10.5.8+

Hi! i have a macbook pro 3.1 with a 10.6.8 version. I want a 10.7 but i dont want any speed problems, what do you think?

Hi! i have a macbook pro 3.1 with core 2 duo, 3gb ram and a 10.6.8 version. I want a 10.7 version but i dont want any speed problems, what do you think?

Some MacBook Pro versions cannot be upgraded past 10.6.8; others are maxed out at 10.7.5. newer models can go all the way to 10.10. So it is important to know exactly what version you have--there may be close to 40 variants produced since the MB made its debut in 2006.
You can safely give us a snapshot of your model and its current config that will allow us to deternmmine your model and its upgrade potential, plus show it you have any software that may impede any upgrades. Please download and install this free utility:
http://www.etresoft.com/etrecheck
It is secure and written by one of our most valued members to allow users to show details of their computer's configuration in Apple Support Communities without revealing any sensitive personal data.
Run the program and click the "Copy report to clipboard" button when it displays the results. Then return here and paste the report into a response to your initial post. It can often show if any harmful files/programs are dragging down your performance.
Remember that, on leaving OS10.6.8, you lose the ability to run older softare written for older PowerPC Macs (yours in Intel-based). Programs such as Office 2004 will no longer work (min of Office 2008 needed to work on newer OS versions), and AppleWorks will stop working completely

I am using an iMac7.1 with 1GB DDR2 SDRAM of speed 667 MHz on board memory. I would like to know what is my best option to upgrade to 4GB on board memory so that I can run Lion OS. Is there a speed limit of the DRAM I can use? Please recommend.

I am using an iMac7.1 with 1GB DDR2 SDRAM of speed 667 MHz on board memory. I would like to know what is my best option to upgrade to 4GB on board memory so that I can run Lion OS. Is there a speed limit of the DRAM use? Please recommend or suggest as soon as possible.

You can install 2 - 200-pin PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 SO-DIMMs. The maximum amount of RAM is 6 GBs. Visit DataMem or OWC to get the proper RAM at reasonable prices.

Linksys E1000 speed limit

Hello all!
I have connected my 2 computers to E1000 with cables and looks like router is setting up some speed limits. Does anybody knows how I can remove speed limit? Did not found any setting in Cisco Connect and Advanced settings
Before: speed ~100Mbps
After: speed ~72Mbps (never goes higher, very strong feeling that it is limited)

before - without connecting through router
after - after connecting through router
moment ago I tried both options
directly to my ISP - ~100Mbps
through router - ~ 72 Mbps
three times switched cable between both options and results are same

How to use Mulitple DAQs with a single triggered event on only one of the DAQs

I have three PXI6115 and would like to tie all these to a single triggered event on one of the DAQs. I've scaned the examples and any assistance would be greatly appreciated....

TCjr,
Please refer to your other post:
How to use Multiple DAQs with a single triggered event on only one of the DAQs

Using NI-DAQ with Borland C++ 5.01

Hi,
I've got a problem using Ni-DAQ with Borland C++ 5.01 (i know this section is for visual C++ but I couldm't find any for ANSI C++). If I write a simple program with one of the libraries included in nidaq.h and if i specify the correct lib and include locations I have a problem with the linkink process; in particular it says that the function can be resolved...
If anyone can help me I would appreciate it. Thanx
Optoclasfo

Hey optoclasfo,
I haven't used Borland much, but with Visual C++ the problem normally
happens because the lib and include paths are not added to the
project. For Visual C++ they are stored at
Tools->Options->Directories. If the library files (*.lib) are not
added to the project you can get this error as well.
I hope this helps out.
Joshua P.
Application Engineering
National Instruments

Speed limit

Hi!
My turn to ask a question. I read some- and everywhere the Athlon XP has a MHz limit of 2500. It seems to be so, but is it? I tried on my own to find an answer, and below is a result of that, but...
Why I don't ask AMD?! Before asking well-paid and intelligent people, I thought I should try the forum.
Speed limit
Athlon XP and Sempron reached a speed limit
The main difference between the socket A processor nowadays seems to be in the architecture of the cache memories. The speed does not pass 2500 MHz. Why is that?
The first Athlons came in 1999. Their advantages compared to their competitor are/were the number of pipelines and calculation units:
- Three decoders for translating the complex but fundamental CISC-instructions into RISC-instructions. The processor has no problem working with the short and simple RISC-instructions.
- Athlon can have 72 instructions simultaneously, (Pentium III 40, and the earlier K6 only 24).
- Very competent FPU:s, three of them, and as FPU is better at calculating decimal numbers than the main ALU, it makes Athlons good at 3D graphics – where there are lots of that kind of mathematics when producing polygons.
In the beginning Athlons had external Level 2 cache. The cache sat on a slot beside the processor, and the architecture was called slot 1. With XP this changed, both Level 1 and Level 2 cache were built into the processor, and we got the socket A kind. Athlon XP was also built with thinner lines connecting the transistors, and got the ability to handle new instructions, got a better data pre-fetch technology, and an overheating protection.
So what’s the problem? Speed it up!
Well, one bottleneck lies between the processor and the RAM memory, the Front Side Bus (FSB). The processor is much faster than the RAM and process data as they come by. To keep the processor busy mainly Intel invented a sort of pipeline, or ladder. The processor is working on every step.
Data is sent from hardware, like sound data or network data over the PCI-bus, graphics data over the AGP-bus, hard-disk data over the IDE (PCI-/SATA) bus, etc. The data comes in ones and zeroes in little packages, which make up complex instructions. For the processor to be able to efficiently perform the instructions they need to be sized down to simpler instructions, from CISC to RISC. (CISC codes is such a fundamental part of the PC history they must remain.) The sizing down is done in the very beginning of each pipeline. In later steps of the pipeline, the instructions are interpreted further and performed.
Early processors needed one clock-cycle per step in the pipeline, but Athlons can manage 2,5 steps, as can for example Pentium 4. With the pipelines, as said, Athlon XP can do 72 instructions at the same time. Pentium 4 however has longer pipelines – with 20 steps – and can process 126 instructions. But the efficiency of a Pentium 4 is lower, which is why Athlons are quicker at the same MHz. Apple’s (Motorola’s) G4 processor is yet more efficient.
Athlon XP has 10 steps in each pipeline for the “main” ALU processor and 15 for the FPU. The reason why there are not more pipelines is that the processor is not kept busy with the slower RAM, and a lot of clock-cycles would be wasted. What is more, there will be too many erroneous instructions, when the processor has to start over, filling the pipelines with correct instructions.
RAM is slower
This was not the case in the beginning. All ran at the same speed, say 20 MHz: Processor, FSB, RAM-memory, PCI-bus etc. By separating the PCI-bus, which had hardware connected that couldn’t work at higher frequencies, things could start moving.
In 1989 came a Pentium with clock doubling. To compensate for the not ‘doubled RAM, L1 cache was invented. But processors kept getting faster. Next thing to be pushed forward was the FSB, which for socket A boards now is increased to 200 MHz x 2 (DDR). Intel increased it even further, but as the efficiency rate isn’t increasing at the same rats, Intel has backed down from the megahertz spiral, and has followed AMD in other ways of thinking.
So is this the simple basic calculation?
Athlon XP:s can do 2,5 instruction per clock-cycle in 10 steps per pipeline x the number of pipelines. The number of pipelines is limited by the number of instructions sent and their quality, 72 instructions at the same time. Can this be the reason for 2500 MHz limit?

Ok, reality check people...
Sharp, nice explanation, but you are wrong.
the x86 instruction set (including those nice MUL, ADD and other instructions) is a CISC instruction set.
The difference? A MUL takes 12 cycles, a DIV 40 or something...
RISC was a new computing architecture. Each instruction is simpler to allow higher execution frequency.
The efficiency of a computer is judge by the work done. W= IPC x Freq
Frequency is the well known number that we can find on our beloved processors. IPC is the instructions per clock. Why is the athlon more efficient than a P4 at the same frequency? higher IPC.
How do the chip manufacturer choose those factors?
Well, the problem is that the instruction set is FIXED. x86 (or i386), the instruction set, has been defined years ago as CISC and to maintain compatibility, you have to keep it. They then included internal decoders to change those instructions to streams of RISC instructions, each simpler. Those are the ones really implemented.
How does that influence the speed of the processor? Each instruction is executed by a unit (integer unit, floating point, MMX...), the more that unit has to do for that imstruction, the more time it takes (and the more transistor). This has 2 problems:
- one is that it will limit the overall speed as the more complex the unit, the less speedy.
- The second is that it ties down the unit. If you do a div in 40+ clocks, your integer unit is tied during this time.
The answer to this problem? Pipelines.
Pipelines are splitting the tasks in simpler tasks and executing each as independant as possible.
Example: laundry. You need washer and dryer. However, some of your clothes cannot go to the dryer.
Now, you have 2 loads. If you have a combined unit that takes 1.5h for wash + dry, it will take 3h total.
If you have a washer (.5h) and a dryer (1h), you load the first load (.5h) then transfer it to the dryer (1h). While the drier works, you load the next washer (0.5h). If you need it to perform also the drier, total time is 2.5h instead of 3h. If you dont need it, it is even faster 1.5h.
This is the way intel followed. Prescott has a 25+ pipeline. The problem comes from branches. If you misspredict your branch, you have to flush the pipe.
All that to say that with its manufacturing and its architecture, AMD could not release a AXP even close to 2.5GHz. Can you overclock a good unit over that limit? Sure. Intel did not release a 4GHz and yet you can overclock some P4 up to 5GHz (with appropriate cooling).
Oh, and the technology used is 90nm or 0.09um. Athlon XP is not even that small, it was still on 130nm.
This is the smallest critical dimention (smallest trace. Usually smallest transistor width).

Issue with adding custom speed to a behavior

I am trying to add a custom speed to a write on behavior. The shape I am trying to write on works fine when I have it at any other speed setting but when I set it to custom (which I need to allow it to both write on and write off at the end) the shape disappears. Despite playing with the custom speed percentage, the shape never comes back. Any ideas?

Ok. I opened your project in my Motion 4 and after it updated it, I got the custom behavior to work fine. However, I had a thought so I decided to open it on my machine that's using Motion 3. There I noticed the problem you're having. I was unable to get the shape write on behavior to work either.
I believe the problem to be with your project. It appears slightly corrupt. Here's something you might try. Create a new project. Redraw your circle shape. Apply the write on behavior and keyframe it as I mentioned before. Then copy and paste it into your current sequence to replace the circle you have in there.
If that doesn't work, I'd rebuild your project. Instead of using all those strokes, just make one X and one O and one line. Then use clones for all the others. That should simplify the project quite a bit.

Writing to dvd with super drive - speed?

I understand from the user manual that I can write to either + or - dvd disks. However they are sold with different speed ratings. Which speed of disk should I buy? Also, in anticipation of further questions, if in 6 months time faster dvd disks are being sold, can I start using faster disks?
Thanks, LJ

Hi Louis XV11:
I understand from the user manual that I can write to
either + or - dvd disks. However they are sold with
different speed ratings. Which speed of disk should I
buy?
If you have the first generation of MB's then you can write to DVD's at 4X and a second generation (LATE 2006) you can write at 6X.
Nowadays you can use any speed, if the disk is rated faster than your drive, it will use your max drive speed, ( so if you have a 16X disk and a 6X drive it will burn at 6X) and if the speed rating is slower than you drives max speed, it will burn at that speed, so you don't need to worry.
For Important data, I would recommend either Apple or Verbatim Disks, and for video, home movies (iMovie, iDVD) use -R.
Also, in anticipation of further questions, if
in 6 months time faster dvd disks are being sold, can
I start using faster disks?
As above
-Robert

In perfdatasource querying for global snapshot failed with error 'the size limit for this '

I received scom alerts from two win 2k8 r2 servers , hosting exchange 2010 mailbox roles , the alerts came almost in same time from both servers ,
can I ignore those alerts
or can someone give a me a clue how can I troubleshoot those alert , please any help would be appreciated
In PerfDataSource, querying for Global Snapshot failed with error 'The size limit for this '
from Ops-mgmt logs
Log Name: Operations Manager
Source: Health Service Modules
Date:
Event ID: 10104
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: server 1
Description:
In PerfDataSource, querying for Global Snapshot failed with error 'The size limit for this '
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: Microsoft.Windows.Server.2008.OperatingSystem.PercentMemoryUsed.Collection
Instance name: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
Log Name: Operations Manager
Source: Health Service Modules
Date:
Event ID: 10104
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: server 1
Description:
In PerfDataSource, querying for Global Snapshot failed with error 'The size limit for this '
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: Microsoft.Windows.Server.2008.LogicalDisk.PercentIdle.Collection
Instance name: " edb file path "
Log Name: Operations Manager
Source: Health Service Modules
Date:
Event ID: 10104
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: server 2
Description:
In PerfDataSource, querying for Global Snapshot failed with error 'The size limit for this '
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: Microsoft.Windows.Server.2008.NetworkAdapter.CurrentBandwidth.Collection
Log Name: Operations Manager
Source: Health Service Modules
Date:
Event ID: 10104
Task Category: None
Level: Error
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: server 2
Description:
In PerfDataSource, querying for Global Snapshot failed with error 'The size limit for this '
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: Microsoft.ForefrontProtection.FPE.Server.PerformanceCollection.RealtimeScanMessageRate

Hi Blake ,
Thanks for your reply , I appreciate your help ,
I didn't put the alert from scom console because they were same as the events ( same source )
Health Service Modules, I didn't want to spam
more :-)
also the two servers encountered the issue were mailbox servers and part of same DAG , it worth mention the alert were resolved
by Exchange 2010 Correlation Engine service
http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2010/10/15/clustering-the-exchange-2010-correlation-engine-service.aspx
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2592561
also the Opsmgmt logs are full of waring and error event like 2023 , 21402 , 21403 , 1207 !!
Log Name: Operations Manager
Source: HealthService
Date:
Event ID: 2023
Task Category: Health Service
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: server 1
Description:
The health service has removed some items from the send queue for management group "SCOM" since it exceeded the maximum allowed size of 15 megabytes.
1- alert from console >>
In PerfDataSource, querying for Global Snapshot failed with error 'The size limit for this '
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: Microsoft.Windows.Server.2008.OperatingSystem.PercentMemoryUsed.Collection
Instance name: Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise
EventSourceName: Health Service Modules

Getting European Speed Limit Signs in US

Is anyone else in the US getting a Euro Speed limit sign? Not a big deal I guess.

Hope that you have used the in app feedback form as detailed here: http://conversations.nokia.com/2013/05/28/the-here-team-is-listening-to-you/
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

FTP speed limit

Hi there,
Trying to figure out why my upload speed is so slow using FTP. I'm working on a 10/10 link full duplex and my speed tests are pretty good overall. My question is why my upload speed using FTP with my browser/explorer is around 150Kbps while the same
file on the same host using FileZilla goes aroung 900Kbps ?! While testing, I disable my AV just to be sure.
Did some research and found a buffer/speed limit on ftp command (ftp.exe /?). Could that be the explanation or am I missing something ?
Thank you

Just to clarify, some questions please:
Are you on a network?
By "Upload", you mean uploading a file over the internet, not within a LAN or WAN, right?
When you say the same file goes 900 kbps using FileZilla, you mean upload, not download, correct?
Also, what kind of internet connection do you have?
One possibility, based on what you've mentioned, is that the server you're uploading to has a maximum speed per connection. This is fairly common. Apps like FileZilla typically use multiple connections to increase download speeds; I haven't used
one in awhile but it's possible they can do this for uploads as well. So if the server you're uploading to has a speed limit of 150 kbps per connection, you'll never be able to get higher speeds unless you use a multithreaded client (like FileZilla).

Speed limit pb

Hello fellows!
I was asked to build a program that calculates the Fine when you exceed the speed limit.
When you exceed 120miles/h the fine is 100$ plus 10$ for every additional mile/h.
I wrote a code,but something is wrong with it. When you drive at the legal speed which is less than 120miles/h it still gives a fine of 100$.
import javax.swing.JOptionPane;
public class radar
     public static void main(String args[])
          String si,so="";
          int s,q,f;
          si=JOptionPane.showInputDialog("Enter the speed");
          s=Integer.parseInt(si);
               q=s-120;
          if ( q>0 )
               f=100+10*q;
               so+="The speeding fine is"+" "+f+"$";
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,so);
          if ( q<=0 )
               so+="You are in the legal speed.There is no fine to pay";
               JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,so);
          System.exit(0);
}This is the first time i'm using the (if) condition. So please tell me if there is something wrong with it.

Melechesh wrote:
When you exceed 120miles/h the fine is 100$ plus 10$ for every additional mile/h.Wow, where do you live? That's a pretty low fine.
>
I wrote a code,but something is wrong with it. When you drive at the legal speed which is less than 120miles/h it still gives a fine of 100$.What do q, f, si, so, s mean? Perhaps you could use more meaningful variable names.
perhaps you forgot to add { } to your if statements, otherwise only the first statement is conditional regardless of your indentation.

Daq with PocketPC any speed limit ??

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for