Darcs - missing dependencies

Hi there,
I was trying to install darcs from AUR, but I can't find its missing dependencies. I'm supposed to install haskell-hashed-storage<0.6, but I can't find it anywhere.
What should I do with this? I'm trying to install xmonad-darcs and that package is really making things difficult.

Hmm... On the one hand I can install xmonad-darcs from repo, but it's older version - on the other, darcs still has unresolved dependencies, haskell-tar<0.4 and haskell-regex-compat<0.94. Both of them are in community repo, but newer versions. Is it a bad idea to modify package from AUR to depend on those newer versions?

Similar Messages

  • How to install missing dependencies?

    I'm trying to install Mailpile (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mailpile/)
    these are showing as missing dependencies when I "makepkg -s"
    python2-pgpdump
    spambayes>=1.1a6
    I got the above two from AUR and "makepkg -s" successfully and then stuck them in /usr/local/bin but it didn't solve the dependencies.  I'm not sure I know what I'm doing. Anybody know how to get Mailpile installed?
    Last edited by bzpnbx (2014-10-14 15:48:51)

    You did run it on the built package, right? Not on the AUR tarball?
    Like Wormzy said, you really need to read the AUR Wiki page.
    nomorewindows wrote:I don't think you even need --asdeps.  It just installs them as any other package.  Then when they install, makepkg -s the main package.
    These packages are being installed because they are dependencies of another package. For pacman to function correctly, --asdeps is needed. If you omit it, pacman thinks they're explicitly installed and will not remove them when the main package is removed nor list them in -Qdt.
    Last edited by Scimmia (2014-10-14 16:50:36)

  • Ignore missing dependencies

    Hello
    I have some parts of the gnome suite installed that enable me to use some of their features, however, I have force removed a fair few other aspects of the gnome suite. Whenever I upgrade my system, Pacman prompts that some of my packages are missing dependencies, is there anyway to ignore this or stop Pacman from warning me?
    Any help is greatly appreciated

    karol wrote:* you can rebuild the gnome suite w/o the unwanted dependencies
    or
    * you can create some dummy pkgs that don't provide any files but pacman thinks that all dependencies are satisfied
    Thanks karol, how might one go about creating these dummy packages?

  • Can't install Dropbox from AUR due to missing dependencies.

    I'm posting in the Newbie Corner, since I suspect that this is a newbie issue with a really simple solution..
    I've been using Dropbox for Linux directly from Dropbox.com, but I had now decided to convert to the AUR version (easier to update). But it won't install. It won't even build.
    ==> Manglende avhengigheter:
    -> qt
    ==> Kontrollerer avhengigheter som trengs under bygging...
    ==> FEIL: Kunne ikke finne alle avhengigheter.
    ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build bbox-git.
    ==> Restart building bbox-git ? [y/N]
    Not optimal that this is in norwegian.. But in essence it tells me that there are missing dependencies. Qt to be exact. And because of this makepkg is not able to build bbox-git. Earlier in the process (when the dependencies for bbox-git is listed) it says that qt is not installed and will be buildt from AUR. I've tried to reinstall qt. Please help.
    EDIT:
    I'm using Yaourt.
    Last edited by madr (2013-06-08 22:24:06)

    Trilby wrote:You say you've tried to install qt, does that mean you failed to install it?  qt should not be installed from the AUR, it is a package group in [extra].
    I've tried to reinstall it. And I've installed it from the official repos of course. The AUR bit is output from Yaourt, not me.
    karol wrote:
    Run
    LC_ALL=C <command>
    to get output in English.
    I'll post the output of this later (it's getting late here).
    mcmillan wrote:
    First, that's not the dropbox package, but something that is like dropbox. If you want the actual dropbox program you want https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dropbox
    If this is the package you actually want, it looks like it hasn't been updated since the qt packaged was renamed qt4, so you'll need to change that in the PKGBUILD file by hand.
    It is the package you're linking to I'm having trouble installing. Okay, I'll have a look. Later. I'll get back to this thread.
    karol wrote:I'm not sure if https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dropbox is easier to update - as you can read in the comments, many users are not happy with the auto-update feature.
    Maybe it's too easy to update ;P , but YMMV.
    Do I ever catch a break in life? Not often at least.

  • Removed Missing Dependencies Missing Features, reanalyzed, now 9x more Missing Dependencies....

    I'm using the excellent Phil Childs get-scripts Powershell scripts to clear out some Missing Dependencies. There were Missing Feature, MissingSetupFile, and MissingAssembly referencences, all related to the same wsp that is no longer in use and
    was retracted.  http://get-spscripts.com/2011/06/removing-features-from-content-database.html
    I removed some Missing Features, reanalyzed, and the 15 item Missing Dependencies list, instead of shrinking, is now at 134 items.
    I’m going to try and figure out cause before I start chugging through these. Any recommendations?
    Thanks,
    Scott

    Hi Scott,
    Are these new 134 error messages different from orginal 15 error messages?
    We need to check each error message description and do as error message content suggests to solve the issue (e.g. may find the webparts referenced this custom feature and remove unwanted web part from the page).
    More articles about the missing dependencies you can take a look.
    http://get-spscripts.com/2011/06/diagnosing-missingsetupfile-issues-from.html
    http://get-spscripts.com/2011/08/diagnose-missingwebpart-and.html
    http://fangdahai.blogspot.com/2014/01/how-to-resolve-missing-server-side.html
    Thanks
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • [Solved] pacman-color failed to install missing dependencies

    Just upgraded my AUR packages and I get this error:
    :: Starting AUR upgrade...
    :: perl-class-load-xs 0.04-2 -> 0.06-1
    AUR Targets (1): perl-class-load-xs
    Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
    :: Edit perl-class-load-xs PKGBUILD? [Y/n] n
    :: Building perl-class-load-xs package...
    ==> Making package: perl-class-load-xs 0.06-1 (Sat Nov 3 09:14:38 PDT 2012)
    ==> Checking runtime dependencies...
    ==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
    ==> Installing missing dependencies...
    error: target not found: perl-test-without-module
    ==> ERROR: 'pacman-color' failed to install missing dependencies.
    :: perl-class-load-xs cleaned
    Any help appreciated.
    Last edited by lagagnon (2012-11-04 03:07:33)

    perl-test-without-module is in the AUR.
    edit: build the package yourself in makepkg or use an aur helper.
    Last edited by SS4 (2012-11-03 16:41:55)

  • Get Yaourt to install missing dependencies?

    Hi, everytime I wanna install something from AUR with Yaourt and the app has dependcies that isnt installed I allways have to install the dependencies manually.
    It just breaks out.
    Here it complains about kernel.
    Why can't it not just download automaticly the missing dependencies?
    ==> omnibook-svn dependencies:
    - kernel26 (already installed)
    - kernel26 (already installed)
    - subversion (already installed)
    ==> WARNING: This PKGBUILD contains install file that can be dangerous.
    omnibook.install
    ==> Edit omnibook.install (recommended) ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort)
    ==> ----------------------------------------------
    ==>n
    ==> Continue the building of omnibook-svn ? [Y/n]
    ==> ----------------------------------------------
    ==>y
    ==> Building and installing package
    mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/abs': Permission denied
    ==> WARNING: Unable to write in /var/abs/local/yaourtbuild/omnibook-svn directory. Using /tmp directory
    ==> Determining latest svn revision...
    -> Version found: 274
    ==> Making package: omnibook-svn 274-1 i686 (Sun Jan 11 07:32:12 CET 2009)
    ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
    ==> Missing Dependencies:
    -> kernel26<2.6.27
    ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
    ==> ERROR: Could not resolve all dependencies.
    Error: Makepkg was unable to build omnibook-svn package.

    your output wrote:Missing Dependencies:
      -> kernel26<2.6.27
    If you go to the AUR page, you'll see that there's a solution there. yaourt is a great tool, but I would get in the habit of knowing what you are downloading before you use it.

  • Yaourt failed to install missing dependencies. then fail md5

    [billytcf@dynames ~]$ yaourt -S aptana
    ==> Downloading aptana PKGBUILD from AUR...
    ==> Last 5 comments ordered by date (asc):
    I deleted the comments here
    ==> aptana dependencies:
    - firefox (package found)
    - libstdc++5 (already installed)
    - j2re (package that provides j2re already installed)
    - unzip (already installed)
    ==> Edit the PKGBUILD (recommended) ? [Y/n] ("A" to abort)
    ==> ----------------------------------------------
    n
    ==> Continue the building of 'aptana'? [Y/n]
    ==> ----------------------------------------------
    ==>Y
    ==> Building and installing package
    ==> Making package: aptana 1.0-1 (Wed Apr 23 14:53:31 UTC 2008)
    ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
    ==> Installing missing dependencies...
    Password:
    error: several packages provide j2re, please specify one :
    jre icedtea6
    ==> ERROR: Pacman failed to install missing dependencies.
    Error: Makepkg was unable to build aptana package.
    I have jdk and jre installed by pacman but still have this prob.
    So i cheated, edited pkgbuild remove all dependencies, then
    ==> aptana dependencies:
    - unzip (already installed)
    ==> Continue the building of 'aptana'? [Y/n]
    ==> ----------------------------------------------
    ==>
    ==> Building and installing package
    ==> Making package: aptana 1.0-1 (Wed Apr 23 15:04:37 UTC 2008)
    ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
    ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies...
    ==> Retrieving Sources...
    -> Found Aptana_Studio_Setup_Linux.zip in build dir
    -> Found aptana.desktop in build dir
    -> Found aptana.png in build dir
    -> Found _aptana in build dir
    ==> Validating source files with md5sums...
    Aptana_Studio_Setup_Linux.zip ... FAILED
    aptana.desktop ... Passed
    aptana.png ... Passed
    _aptana ... Passed
    ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
    Error: Makepkg was unable to build aptana package.
    tried downloading the file for a few times but still fail md5
    May I request help here??
    thanks everyone!!
    Last edited by billytcf (2008-04-23 07:02:50)

    It's quite simple. When the AUR package was created, the current version of Aptana was 1.0, but the source url links to the latest version. This was all ok until they released version 1.1 because then you suddenly have a completely new file that gets downloaded and because of this is will fail the md5 check.
    It's very simple to fix though, in one of two ways. Either just delete the md5sum=() array (changing pkgver=1.0 to pkgver=1.1 would also be a good idea), or download the PKGBUILD and in the same directory as you store it just run makepkg -g and replace the md5sum array with the resulting data (this would be the best way to handle this...).
    Last edited by Dirhael (2008-04-23 11:17:05)

  • Cisco PacketTracer missing dependencies. [Solved]

    Hi,
    So I was going to install packet tracer. I followed the tutorial in the wiki section. <a href="https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PacketTracer">PacketTracer</a> Which seems a little thin I got to the part makepkg. here is the out put of what I did.
    [ofce@myhost packettracer]$ makepkg -s
    ==> Making package: packettracer 5.3.2-2 (Sat Jan 14 13:05:39 CST 2012)
    ==> Checking runtime dependencies...
    ==> Installing missing dependencies...
    Password:
    error: target not found: lib32-libpng12
    ==> ERROR: 'pacman' failed to install missing dependencies.
    [ofce@myhost packettracer]$
    Any idea on how to get this working? I would like to get my assignments done for my cisco classes
    Last edited by mich04 (2012-01-14 21:22:53)

    # /etc/pacman.conf
    # See the pacman.conf(5) manpage for option and repository directives
    # GENERAL OPTIONS
    [options]
    # The following paths are commented out with their default values listed.
    # If you wish to use different paths, uncomment and update the paths.
    #RootDir = /
    #DBPath = /var/lib/pacman/
    #CacheDir = /var/cache/pacman/pkg/
    #LogFile = /var/log/pacman.log
    HoldPkg = pacman glibc
    # If upgrades are available for these packages they will be asked for first
    SyncFirst = pacman
    #XferCommand = /usr/bin/wget --passive-ftp -c -O %o %u
    #XferCommand = /usr/bin/curl -C - -f %u > %o
    #CleanMethod = KeepInstalled
    Architecture = auto
    # Pacman won't upgrade packages listed in IgnorePkg and members of IgnoreGroup
    #IgnorePkg =
    #IgnoreGroup =
    #NoUpgrade =
    #NoExtract =
    # Misc options (all disabled by default)
    #UseSyslog
    #ShowSize
    #UseDelta
    #TotalDownload
    #CheckSpace
    # REPOSITORIES
    # - can be defined here or included from another file
    # - pacman will search repositories in the order defined here
    # - local/custom mirrors can be added here or in separate files
    # - repositories listed first will take precedence when packages
    # have identical names, regardless of version number
    # - URLs will have $repo replaced by the name of the current repo
    # - URLs will have $arch replaced by the name of the architecture
    # Repository entries are of the format:
    # [repo-name]
    # Server = ServerName
    # Include = IncludePath
    # The header [repo-name] is crucial - it must be present and
    # uncommented to enable the repo.
    # The testing repositories are disabled by default. To enable, uncomment the
    # repo name header and Include lines. You can add preferred servers immediately
    # after the header, and they will be used before the default mirrors.
    #[testing]
    #Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [core]
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [extra]
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    #[community-testing]
    #Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    [community]
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    # If you want to run 32 bit applications on your x86_64 system,
    # enable the multilib repositories as required here.
    #[multilib-testing]
    #Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    #[multilib]
    Include = /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist
    # An example of a custom package repository. See the pacman manpage for
    # tips on creating your own repositories.
    #[custom]
    #Server = file:///home/custompkgs
    Here it is, when I run pacman -Syu I only see core, extra and community.

  • Right-click on a VI with missing dependencies hangs LabVIEW

    Here's the flow:
    1)  Download a VI from the forums that has a missing dependency
    2)  Add the VI to a project
    3)  Right-click on the VI to see if it's set to run-on-open
    4)  Wait a very long time for the dependency load to fail
    How do you all handle the forum VIs? Is it as simple as checking the Files view for missing deps - and only RMB if none are missing?
    I can't find any of the "silently ignore all" posts/ideas except for opening refs.
    When I create new VIs and force a dependency failure, there is not a long delay.

    How do you tell if the VI is set to Run When Opened?  If you are opening the properties dialog, the VI still has to load.
    ***Just performed an experiment***
    Opening the VI from the project overrides the Run When Opened.  Good thing to know.
    But still, when you try to open a VI and there are missing dependencies, you get a dialog that has the Ignore All on it.
    There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
    Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines
    Attachments:
    Loading Window.PNG ‏23 KB

  • [SOLVED][AUR] lib32-allegro Missing dependencies...

    Hello community...
    still on my first week on ArchLinux so bear with me...
    i find this strange...
    im trying to install a game Beat Hazard Ultra (i have the bin file)
    and beathazardultra can be found in the aur (game separated)
    i looked at the PKBUILD for instructions and it says to put the bin in the same folder
    OK i got that part
    then sudo makepkg -s --asroot
    it says its missing lib32-allegro
    this lib can only be found in AUR so i repeat the same procedure
    NOW, the lib32-allegro is also Missing dependencies
    when i sudo makepkg -s --asroot
    i search the aur of the missing dependencies and found it...
    i makepkg all of them and they installed
    so now im ready to install lib32-allegro again... but its still saying that its missing the same dependecies... am i missing a step here?
    heres a screenshot:
    (*EDIT: i know the screenshot says i used sudo makepkg -f --asroot but i also tried it with -s but it cannot find it on the official repo since its in AUR)
    http://i.imgur.com/ijK67Kf.png
    -- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --
    Last edited by FenrirAB (2014-04-18 01:10:45)

    the screenshot was to visually provide info that i have the aur packages (and assuming that the highlighted directories have been installed)
    sorry, i suck at explaining so i hope the screenshot will provide clarity.... yup already enabled multilib... and i can see it enabled by -Syu
    i know they gave me a warning about using --asroot isnt that what to use if you have a separate /root /home folder if you want to install it in /root? but if its not then... i will stop using it... ^-^
    anyways
    i already rebooted my laptop just in case it needed a reboot to see the lib32 dependencies... but they are still missing
    i would like to know why those dependencies are still missing...
    THANKS FOR BEING PATIENT ^_^

  • Missing Dependencies -- Newbie Question

    hello,
    i'm just getting started with the after effects sdk. some of the sample plug-ins are giving me the following error when i load aeps that already use them:
    "The following layer dependencies are missing: [plug-in name, e.g., Convolutrix]: Missing Dependencies requested."
    it also happens with the skeleton template (but not with SDK_Noise). all i did was open up the projects in xcode and hit build. then i moved the plugins to the plugins/effects folder. is there something i'm missing in the xcode project setup? could it be b/c i'm only using a trial version of cs5? i'm a bit baffled by the error since i didn't do anything to the code (yet) and it only happens with some of the sample plug-ins.
    thanks in advance,
    j

    hello again,
    i spent a little more time with the code. as far as i can tell, the plug-ins are working fine. the DescribeDependencies function of the skeleton template gives a "missing dependencies" alert most of the time: if (rand() % 9). am i reading this right?
    thanks,
    jeremy

  • Overwriting Dev and Stage DB's with Production creates Missing Dependencies

    When I refresh my Dev and Stage environments by restoring the DBs with those from Production, I get numerous Missing Dependency errors.
    We have lots of custom WSPs, and I think that the cause is that the production WSPs are overwriting those in the other environments without first retracting/deleting them.
    Is there a way to restore without creating these errors?
    Thanks,
    Scott

    if the custom WSP is deployed as a sandbox solution, then it'll be included in the content database refresh.
    the missing dependency stuff is all about finding GUIDs that SharePoint can't resolve... whether that's a web part or a feature.
    The retraction/deletion process doesn't actually clean up contents in the content database (web parts in use, etc)... it just handles the synchronous deployment of the feature between servers. So regardless of how a custom WSP is deployed/updated/etc, missing
    dependencies can happen.
    The question you need to address, is tracking down the missing dependencies, and determining whether they are still in use in PROD (perhaps the component was removed, but the web part still exists on a page), and if so making sure it's also available in
    DEV/TEST... assuming it's necessary... if a web part isn't available in DEV/TEST, maybe it doesn't matter, and maybe the missing dependency isn't an issue.
    Scott Brickey
    MCTS, MCPD, MCITP
    www.sbrickey.com
    Strategic Data Systems - for all your SharePoint needs

  • Yaourt -Syu = "missing dependencies: linuy-firmwake" KINDA [SOLVED]

    This has to be some kind of error. linuy-firmwake must mean linux-firmware, right?
    I hate to give so few details, but I don't know what else to post. I recently discovered a bad RAM stick. Its been removed.
    Now when i enter yaourt -Syu or yaourt -Syy, i get these two phantom dependencies.
    Boot also hangs, but if i "alt f2" I can log in.
    Thoughts?
    Last edited by wsims (2011-01-11 21:56:31)

    No missing dependencies when using pacman. I don't even know where to start on this one.
    Nothing seems to be broken, so its not that big a deal, just annoying. I'm kind of OCD and can't stand little anomalies like this.

  • OEL 5.5 11gR2 Validated RPM Missing Dependencies

    OEL 5.5 attempting to install 11gR2. We are getting dependency errors when trying to run the validated rpm. The errors are when trying to find glibc and glibc-headers. It appears that we have only the x86_64 and i686 versions of glibc, but not the i386 version. We have checked the install disk as well as using yum and neither have the i386 version. How do we resolve this dependency? Below are the error messages.
    # yum install oracle-validated-1.0.0-22.el5.x86_64.rpm
    Loaded plugins: dellsysid, security
    Setting up Install Process
    Examining oracle-validated-1.0.0-22.el5.x86_64.rpm: oracle-validated-1.0.0-22.el5.x86_64
    Marking oracle-validated-1.0.0-22.el5.x86_64.rpm to be installed
    Resolving Dependencies
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package oracle-validated.x86_64 0:1.0.0-22.el5 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.1/libstdc++.a for package: oracle-validated
    Importing additional filelist information
    --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib/libaio.so for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib/libc.so for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib/libodbc.so.1 for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: /usr/lib/libodbccr.so for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: compat-gcc-34 for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: compat-gcc-34-c++ for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: elfutils-libelf-devel for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: gcc-c++ for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: gdb for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: libXp.so.6 for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: libaio-devel for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: sysstat for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: unixODBC-devel for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: libdb-4.2.so()(64bit) for package: oracle-validated
    --> Processing Dependency: libodbc.so.1()(64bit) for package: oracle-validated
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package compat-db.x86_64 0:4.2.52-5.1 set to be updated
    ---> Package compat-gcc-34.x86_64 0:3.4.6-4 set to be updated
    ---> Package compat-gcc-34-c++.x86_64 0:3.4.6-4 set to be updated
    ---> Package elfutils-libelf-devel.x86_64 0:0.137-3.el5 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: elfutils-libelf-devel-static-x86_64 = 0.137-3.el5 for package: elfutils-libelf-devel
    ---> Package gcc-c++.x86_64 0:4.1.2-48.el5 set to be updated
    ---> Package gdb.x86_64 0:7.0.1-23.el5 set to be updated
    ---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.5-49 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.5-49 for package: glibc-devel
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-49 for package: glibc-devel
    ---> Package libXp.i386 0:1.0.0-8.1.el5 set to be updated
    ---> Package libaio-devel.i386 0:0.3.106-5 set to be updated
    ---> Package libstdc++-devel.x86_64 0:4.1.2-48.el5 set to be updated
    ---> Package sysstat.x86_64 0:7.0.2-3.el5 set to be updated
    ---> Package unixODBC.i386 0:2.2.11-7.1 set to be updated
    ---> Package unixODBC.x86_64 0:2.2.11-7.1 set to be updated
    ---> Package unixODBC-devel.i386 0:2.2.11-7.1 set to be updated
    --> Running transaction check
    ---> Package elfutils-libelf-devel-static.x86_64 0:0.137-3.el5 set to be updated
    ---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.5-49 set to be updated
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.5-49 for package: glibc-devel
    --> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-49 for package: glibc-devel
    --> Finished Dependency Resolution
    glibc-devel-2.5-49.i386 from el5_u5_base has depsolving problems
    --> Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-49 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-49.i386 (el5_u5_base)
    glibc-devel-2.5-49.i386 from el5_u5_base has depsolving problems
    --> Missing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.5-49 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-49.i386 (el5_u5_base)
    Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.5-49 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-49.i386 (el5_u5_base)
    Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-49 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-49.i386 (el5_u5_base)
    You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
    You could try running: package-cleanup --problems
    package-cleanup --dupes
    rpm -Va nofiles nodigest

    Hi user;
    Please try below query to can find your rpm on your system:
    rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}-%{VERSION}.%{RELEASE} (%{ARCH})\n" | grep libaio
    libaio-0.3.105.2 (i386)
    libaio-0.3.105.2 (x86_64)
    I made 11gr2 installation on OEL and i could find all related rmp on disk, i didnt use yum future for my issue. Be sure you have all prerequest
    Also see *Hans Forbrich's post*:
    Installing Oracle 11gR2 on OEL 5.3
    http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=954684&tstart=0
    Regard
    Helios

Maybe you are looking for