Data inconsistency

hi to all
what is the meaning of data inconsistency?
plz explain this one
thanks@regards
ravi

Hello Ravi,
Inconsistency means Variation, Discrepancy, Difference. so when there is any difference/variation in data will be considered as data inconsistency.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Similar Messages

Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type (FAA_POST047)

Hi colleagues!
I have the following error:
Data inconsistency: posting with restricted transaction type
Message no. FAA_POST047
Diagnosis
You are trying to post in company code 1000 with transaction type 130 in ledger group 0N. According to table TABWA, this transaction type is limited. Nonetheless, according to your entries, you want to post to area 11.
System Response
Using limited transaction types is obsolete and would lead to an inconsistent posting in this situation. The system rejects the posting.
Procedure
Use a transaction type that is not limited. And, if possible, choose the ledger group and/or depreciation area on the initial screen.
According to specific accounting we shouldn't post to one of the depr. area, so most of the tr.types are restricted to post to all areas except this one.
Because of this, posting from MM with acc.assignment 'A' is impossible - I have this error.
Any ideas how to solve?
Thanks in advance

Hi Anton
This looks like your transaction type -130 is limited to post only in ledger group-0N as per the transaction type configuration. Due to which system is unable to post all the ledgers and hence this lead to inconsistency.
Please verify the transaction type 130- in configuration T code - OAYA and see if it is restricted by depreciation area (eventually allow to post only ledger group- 0N.
Tcode - OAYA (Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Areas)
please verify and let us know the update. hope this helps
Best Regards
Jomon

How to fix calendar date inconsistency

Hello,
I have a problem with closing material period due to inconsistency with actual calendar date. Last closed period in material master of specific cc is 07.2009.(It is test system with IDES database). How to close remaining periods to 01.2012. I can not do it in mmpv.
Regards
Sylvester
Moderator messaage: I cant see any proof for the calendar date inconsistency that you mentioned in the subject.
It is the same question about month end closing which was answered many hundred times in this forum.,
Please search the forum before asking the same questions again. Read the forum rules before posting.
thread locked.
Edited by: Jürgen L. on Jan 19, 2012 10:42 PM

Hi, If it is IDES follow below step, but never try this in Production system,
First check in OX06 & OBY6, "Fiscal Year Variant" is maintained as K4,
Then Use T-code OX18, delete all the assignments of your company code & plant,
Now use T-code OMSY enter the year & period (2012 & 01)
Noe again Use T-code OX18, and again do the assignments of the company codes & all plants

IDOC data inconsistency

Hi experts,
i have an issue that there is data inconsistency in IDOC( delivery address created with respect to PLANT instead of STORAGE LOCATION).
now i want to rectify the issue by checking the mapping in the program , the IDOC is created by standard procude ( thorough ME21N).
can anybody tell me how can i find the program/interface name where the logic is written for filed mapping for IDOC
IDOC type ORDERS05
Message type ORDERS
Thanks
Niru

Hi ,
I have put a breakpoint inside the FM IDOC_OUTPUT_ORDERS and try to reprocess the idoc from WE19, but the control not stoped at Break point .
assume below is validation inside the FM makng the issue.
IF pekko-werks NE space AND
      pekko-kunnr EQ space AND
      pekko-emlif EQ space AND
      pekko-adrn2 EQ space AND
      pekko-adrnr EQ space.
     CLEAR int_edidd.
     CLEAR e1edka1.
     int_edidd-segnam = 'E1EDKA1'.
     e1edka1-parvw = 'WE'.
*- if Third party order, send customer number of first S.O. item -----*
     PERFORM fill_kunnr_header.
     e1edka1-lifnr = pekko-werks.
     lv_prog = 'SAPLEINM'.
     PERFORM fill_e1edka1_we_gln IN PROGRAM (lv_prog) IF FOUND.
     PERFORM edka1_fuellen.
* Call Method PROCESS_IDOC_SEGMENT (BADI MM_EDI_ORDERS_OUT)
     PERFORM badi_process_idoc_segment.
* Call Customer Function 002 (enhancement MM06E001)
     PERFORM customer_function.
*   Außenhandelsdaten
*   Partnerzusatz für IMPINV01 ab Release 4.0A z.B. Zoll-ID-Nummer
     IF control_record_out-idoctp(6) EQ 'IMPINV'.
       PERFORM fill_e1edkaz.
     ENDIF.
   ENDIF.
*- Manuelle Anlieferungsanschrift, wenn in allen Positionen gleich ----
   IF pekko-adrnr NE space AND
      pekko-kunnr EQ space.
     CLEAR int_edidd.
     CLEAR e1edka1.
     int_edidd-segnam = 'E1EDKA1'.
can you please tell me how can control stoped at this code?
regards
niru

Migration CC and FF data from Virsa 4.0 to GRC 10.1 Data Inconsistency

Hello Guru's
We have done Migration from VIRSA 4.0 Compliance Calibrator (CC) and Firefighter (FF) data from to GRCAC 10.1 system.
After Migration, data inconsistency is coming while validation.
Followed standard sap migration guide virsa 4.0 to 10.0
Patch level - GRC AC 10.1 system
SAP_BASIS
740
0008
SAPKB74008
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
SAP Basis Component
SAP_ABA
740
0008
SAPKA74008
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
Cross-Application Component
SAP_GWFND
740
0008
SAPK-74008INSAPGWFND
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
SAP Gateway Foundation 7.40
SAP_UI
740
0010
SAPK-74010INSAPUI
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
User Interface Technology 7.40
PI_BASIS
740
0008
SAPK-74008INPIBASIS
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
Basis Plug-In
ST-PI
740
0000
0000
SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
SAP_BW
740
0008
SAPKW74008
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
SAP Business Warehouse
GRCFND_A
V1100
0006
SAPK-V1106INGRCFNDA
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
GRC Foundation ABAP
GRCPINW
V1100_731
0006
SAPK-11506INGRCPINW
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
SAP GRC NetWeaver Plug-In
IW_FNDGC
100
0002
SAPK-10002INIWFNDGC
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
SAP IW FNDGC 100
WEBCUIF
747
0005
SAPK-74705INWEBCUIF
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
SAP Web UI Framework
IW_CBS
200
0009
SAPK-20009INIWCBS
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
SAP IW CBS 200
IW_CNT
200
0009
SAPK-20009INIWCNT
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
SAP IW CNT 200
IW_SCS
200
0009
SAPK-20009INIWSCS
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
Screen Scraping
POASBC
100_731
0001
SAPK-10201INPOASBC
0000
@6H\QAchieved with Support Package@
POA Shared Business Components
Patch level VIRSA 4.0 system
GRCPINW
V1100_731
0008
SAPK-11508INGRCPINW
SAP GRC NetWeaver Plug-In
Kindly let us know after migration, any sap notes need to install.
Regards,
karunakar

Hello Prasant,
We have migrated VIRSA 4 0 to GRC 10.1 system, after migration we have below issues.
1. In table GRACSODRISK (not able to see the medium risk, but in NWBC screen (Access Risks) we are seeing the medium risks.
2. In Function Permission.txt file ( only AND is coming for all, but some OR is avaiable in VIRSA 4 0 system.
And for gap (it automatically taken AND
Example:
AM02
FB02
F_BKPF_BED
ACTVT
2
AND
0
AM02
FB02
F_BKPF_BED
ACTVT
3
AND
1
AM02
FB02
F_BKPF_BED
BRGRU
AND
1
AM02
FB02
F_BKPF_BEK
ACTVT
2
AND
0
AM02
FB02
F_BKPF_BEK
ACTVT
3
AND
1
AM02
FB02
F_BKPF_BEK
BRGRU
AND
1
kindly suggest.
Regards,
Karunakar

Credit data inconsistency

Dear Experts !
Please help me in the below credit management scenario.
User observed some inconsistent data in transaction -VKM1 with respect to the FD33 screen . I checked the data in RVKRED88 report and found that open order value of the sales order-XXX was much lesser than the credit value of the same sales order in VKM1 transaction.
Could you please tell me whether the open order value in the report RVKRED88 is correct or that shows in VKM1 is correct and how to rectify this data inconsistency.
Thanks in advance !
Sandeep

Dear Sandeep,
There are two programmes to correct the Credit data inconsistency
First use the Program RVKRED77. the you can use the second Program RVKRED88. in SE38 transaction enter the programme then click on execute or press F8
There system will ask you to maintain the selecction criteria.
RVKRED77
Credit account
Credit control area
RVKRED88
Credit account
Credit control area
Document number
Best Regards,
Mh

Exception message 62 - Master Data Inconsistant

I'm getting the referenced exception message when generating an MRP run with scheduling value of "lead time scheduling and capacity planning". I've done consistency checks on all master records - routings, work centers, etc - and all have come back clean. Anyone have any idea why this may be happening?
Thanks!
Bob

Hi,
62 Scheduling: Master data inconsistent Check master data !
Remove "In House Processing Time" from the Material Master MRP2
view. Ensure that the Production Version & Routing are correct. Run
MPS/MRP manually once corrected.
Regards
Sunil

Data inconsistency problem TABLES: VBUK/VBUP vs VBAK/VBAP

Hi,
I have the fun task of trying to solve a data inconsistency problem caused by a faulty network connection between R/3 and our SQL server.
To add to the fun my knowledge of the outbound systems is pretty close to zero.
Apparently our warehouse was booking stock and after booking they process the STO NO in VL10B.
While posting the outbound in VL02n some of the lines did not generate.
So they deleted the outbound and tried again.
After they finished playing around and our connections acted funky, I now have data for the outbound in tables VBUP/VBUK (Outbound status tables), but seemingly nowhere else.
There is no data in ekpo, lips, vbak or vbap.
So the question is:
How on earth do I get rid of these entries safely, or otherwise try to generate the missing data?
Just changing the statuses to completed did not work as they end up having problems when trying to pick more stock on articles that had entries on the missing outbound.
Any other ideas?
What other tables do I need to check for entries?
Thanks
Charl
Message was edited(typos) by:
Charl Holtzhausen

Hi,
With the help of SAP we solved the problem.
Apart from VBUP/VBUK there was data in table VBBE (stock movement).
Deleting the entries in these cleared the problem.
It was important to check that further STOs were not adversely affected, which it seems it was not.
Regards

Data Inconsistency on MI Client

Hi,
I am using MI 7.0 SP13 Client. I have deployed MAU3.0 and I am facing major Data Inconsistency Issues.
On Sync, it gives error - Problems during syncronization.
On the middleware, in Merep_mon, with my intervention, some of the queues are in finished and some in ignore state and this is the deadlock I have achieved for now.
I am thinking of following this link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/4c/7862a6642eab40ac7abf34e9048c93/frameset.htm
Following this I want to achieve an initial download of the whole data set.
This link talks about manually deleting the data files from the client and this is where I have some confusion.
There are a lot many files in the data folder in root MI folder. Shall I delete everything in it? Or what exactly is to be deleted?
And what happens if I choose - Refresh Replica Database - as suggested in that link without deleting any data from the client?
(And will this be a good option, if I uninstall the application and reinstall it again and then Sync for the data - I think it should work but I dont want to follow this path for now)
Ankur

Hi Ankur,
the initial question is: why do you have anything in ignore state?
As long as you can sync and the sync does not give major exceptions, you can follow the path and delete the local dataset with the button on the settings screen. This will give you a complete new dataset from the middleware.
If you get an exception with every sync you do, then you can either reinstall the device or delete the files. Well, try to delete the files and play a little with it, you get the feeling about the correct files soon. But as I said: as long as you can sync and just have data inconsistency between backend and lcient - you can reset the client persistence form the settings screen of MI. But again: why do you have this? It must be a major problem in ypur enhancements then, cause normal MAM does not have these issues in normal case!
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Oliver

Data inconsistency: Parallel depr. area is not posted

Dear friends,
When user posting depreciation
Depreciation areas are not posted for asset class 2000 in conpany code AO01 its not updated, i am getting an error when posting a fixed asset on above class when using t.code ABZON
ERROR IS Data inconsistency: Parallel depr. area is not posted
may i know what is the reasion?
Please help me on this issue
Thanks in advance

Go to OAYZ, select the required Asset Class and deactivate the depreciation area.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Data Inconsistency; Partition /BIC/B0000 not deleted

Hello Experts,
I have created a process chain that deletes the change logs from different DSOs. When I scheduled it to run this morning, I got the error message saying 'Data inconsistency; Partition /BIC/B0000254000 not deleted'. I then checked the change log requests and there is one request which was created 8 months ago. System does not allow me delete it manually either, it comes up with the same message.
Would you please help me as to how I can resolve this issuse?
Thanks.

Hi,
look for OSS note 849857 (and note 733371) explain how to use specific program in SE38 RSAR_PSA_CLEANUP_DIRECTORY.
This task is just to check that PSA has problem with partition 0.
here check option "Only active PSA" and "persistent staging area" and all the options in "check options".
execute the program.
In the log you will get the PSA name which is creating the issue.
Go to Specific program SAP_PSA_ZEROCORRECT and give your PSA name here and check the option I_REPAIR only.
schedule the job in background.
LATER!!!! Check in SM37
Job name SAP_PSA_ZEROCORRECT Status = finished
Check with RSAR_PSA_CLEANUP_DIRECTORY again!
and this time you will not get any log.
Thanks
Ajeet
Thanks

Data Inconsistency for 0EMPLOYEE between ECC and BI

Hi,
We do a full load to 0EMPLOYEE using 0EMPLOYEE_ATTR from ECC. There were records deleted for lot of employees (some action types) in ECC. This has caused data inconsistency for 0EMPLOYEE master data (time-dependent) between ECC and BI. In BI we have more records for these employees (Additional records have time-dependent range that were deleted from ECC but still exist in BI). These employee records are already being used in lot of InfoProviders. Is there an efficient way to fix this issue? One of the solution is to delete data from all InfoProviders and then delete from Master data for 0EMPLOYEE, but the deletion of employee records can happen quite often, so we don't want to take this route. Also, I tried to re-organize master data attributes for 0EMPLOYEE through process chain, but that didn't work either.
Message was edited by:
Ripel Desai

Hi Ripel,
I share your pain. This is one of the real pains of Time-Dependant master data in BW. I have been in your exact position and the only way round the issue for me was to clear out all the cubes that used 0EMPLOYEE and then delete and re-load 0EMPLOYEE data.
I know this responce doesn't help you but at least you are not alone.
Regards,
Pete
http://www.teklink.co.uk

Data inconsistency: Parallel depr. area is not posted - while doing F-90

Dear All,
While doing F-90 with transaction type 100 i am getting below error kidly suggest me if any thing is missing.
Error- Data inconsistency: Parallel depr. area is not posted
          Message no. AAPO104
Diagnosis
For chart of depreciation 1000, you defined this area (or these areas) as parallel depreciation areas for depreciation area 01. In the current transaction, however, not all of these areas are posted. This is not allowed.
Procedure
Check if the transaction type is limited to certain depreciation areas. If there is such a limitation, add the missing depreciation areas for the transaction type.
Check if the asset that is being posted manages all these depreciation areas.
Regards,
Sahil

Dear expert
    please read OSS note :Check note 67688
   210557 Mass retiremt w/ revenue in case of parallel crcies
124231 AAPO104 w/o reason in intercompany asset transfer
   97388 Asset transfer: Problems with parallel areas
Regards
   Ajeesh.s

Data Inconsistency: Parallel Dep area is not posted Message no. AAPO104

Team
Could you please help on this.
We tried settling a PS to Asset for AUC T code CJ88 but recd error message Data Inconsistency: Parallel Dep area is not posted Message no. AAPO104.
Dep area are maintained correctly, parallel currencies & Dep area setting for that are maintained correctly, in Customising conssistency check no error.
but it is not settling, could you please let me know if I have missed something.
Transaction type is also not limited to any Dep area.
Regards
Ajay

what should be checked in TOBJ
This table basically relates to User-defined (additional to SAP-defined) objects are documented. So you need to check with your basis. Otherwise, for the error message you indicated, only three notes are available which has already been indicated above.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Data inconsistency, Partition /BIC/B00004240000 not deleted

Hi,
We've got some problems when we are trying to delete a PSA request in our QA system.
The error message is: Data inconsistency, Partition /BIC/B00004240000 not deleted
Does anyone know what this means? We've never had this problem before.
Thanks!
BR,
Linda

Hello Linda,
Please try this ABAP program RSAR_PSA_PARTITION_CHECK and while executing set the following
Object = 'RSAR'
Subobject = 'METADATA'
Ext. Identif. = 'RSAR_PSA_PARTITION_CHECK'
Please refer to the OSS
Note 856097 - Check and repair program for Note 849857
Note 733371 - CleanUp for inconsistent PSA directory entries
Note 1042182 - Secondary index is inconsistent for PSA tables
Note 1102625 - Repair tool for Note 1102623 (PARTNO = 9999)
Thanks
Chandran
Edited by: Chandran Ganesan on Feb 29, 2008 4:45 PM

Data inconsistency :Virtual Uid cannot be found

Hi,
I have some restricted Kfs and calaculated kfs in my query when I try to save it gives me the error Data inconsistency :Virtual Uid cannot be found
Sany

This error happens when you use an RKF or CKF which includes an invalid variable. In our case this happened when using a query copy program to copy from a 3.x to 7.0 system. When each additional CKF and RKF was created multiple versions were created with an invalid variable place holder. I had to remove this invalid reference before the query would work correctly.

Data inconsistency

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for