Data is so slow!

Why is my Iphone 4s so slow with any data? twitter,facebook, mlbtv, internet, ever app that uses data. any thoughts?

The iPhone can't do 4G LTE.
It will show the 4G indicator when connected to the HSPA+ network.
Try speedtest.net and see what your throughput is.
Where, specifically, are you? New York City? LA, Cleveland, Detroit?  What city?

Similar Messages

  • Fetching data is very slow in workspace for planning application

    Hello Everyone,
    I am working in the web environment of a planning application and recently I have seen some issue's like Fetching data is very slow through webform's and the system will locking automatically and which kick me off from workspace when I refresh.So could you suggest me like what would be the reason's for this issue's.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    Sounds like your form is very large or there are maybe a lot of dynamic calcs on the retrieval. How many rows and columns have you on the form ? Have you dense or sparse dimensions as rows or columns?
    Brian

  • Data is very slow

    While I do love the phone, data is definitely a lot slower.

    Viphone26 wrote:
    Well compared to a Droid 2, a droid X, and an LG ally that my cousin has, data is quite slow. I find it taking a good couple of seconds to open up a web page, and it takes a little longer than usual to download an app via 3g than my ipod touch can via wifi.
    Its probably their way to get you to justify buying another 700 dollar phone when the Iphone 4G comes out and data prices go through the roof. 

  • Data transfer very slow on mac pro!! mac H/W unable to fit specifications.

    Hi,
    I am installinginternal disks on the quad mac pro and the transfer ratet in the mac are very slow!!!
    the disks are: barracuda 7200.10 disks, 500 GB. Sta II 300, max ST3500630AS firmware 3.AAE . throughput:300mb.jumpred off to get the 300.
    MAC tells that the QUAD MAC Pro equipment (2x2.66ghz dualcore intel xeon) comes with a 3.Gigabit specification/ 300MB/sec. (Intel ESB2 AHCI, speed: 3.0 Gigabit. AHCI version 1.10 supported)...
    And the benchmarks of the disk ST3500630AS show maximum 80MB/sec and a minimin of 37.3MB/sec, average 63.1 MB/sec. (anandtech tests).
    According to seagate.com the maximum sustained data transfer rate:78MB/s
    but in the mac the reallity is different: I am getting a transfer rate of 22MB/sec!!!!! . with out any application running and only making copy of the files!!!!
    that means that the mac is only providing only 1/3 of the expected transfer rate for the disks..
    so, is there a way that the MAC Pro gets all the normal transfer rate for those disks???
    Is the Quad MAC Pro hardware unable to get the maximum throughput of the disks???
    It seems that the mac is unable to get also the average transfer rate of those disks.. how to correct it???
    thanks a lot
    Alberto
    ps. just for fun: I am getting a faster transfer rate from an old power pc ,and old pc, and firewire 400 and old ide disks!!! (36MB/seg!!!)

    Yup.
    BThe latest Mac Pro are better, so if you have a new or 2 month old unit, Seagate should work, though I think there should be later firmware.
    Some would say those drives take the cake or woRSe.
    http://www.barefeats.com/hard91.html
    SEAGATE PUZZLES
    +Firmware version 3.AEE or later solves the slow sustained large block write speed issue for a single 7200.10 inside the Mac Pro.+
    +The remaining performance issue is slow small random read speeds for one, two, three or four drives. No matter how many drives you configure in RAID 0 sets, the average random read speed for combined block sizes from 64K to 1024K is less than 30MB/s (based on QuickBench 3 testing).+
    +Until Seagate fixes this, we can't recommend the 7200.10 series as the ideal boot drive for the Mac Pro (or Power Mac).+
    http://www.barefeats.com/quad08.html

  • 4.2.3/.4 Data load wizard - slow when loading large files

    Hi,
    I am using the data load wizard to load csv files into an existing table. It works fine with small files up to a few thousand rows. When loading 20k rows or more the loading process becomes very slow. The table has a single numeric column for primary key.
    The primary key is declared at "shared components" -> logic -> "data load tables" and is recognized as "pk(number)" with "case sensitve" set to "No".
    While loading data, these configuration leads to the execution of the following query for each row:
    select 1 from "KLAUS"."PD_IF_CSV_ROW" where upper("PK") = upper(:uk_1)
    which can be found in the v$sql view while loading.
    It makes the loading process slow, because of the upper function no index can be used.
    It seems that the setting of "case sensitive" is not evaluated.
    Dropping the numeric index for the primary key and using a function based index does not help.
    Explain plan shows an implicit "to_char" conversion:
    UPPER(TO_CHAR(PK)=UPPER(:UK_1)
    This is missing in the query but maybe it is necessary for the function based index to work.
    Please provide a solution or workaround for the data load wizard to work with large files in an acceptable amount of time.
    Best regards
    Klaus

    Nevertheless, a bulk loading process is what I really like to have as part of the wizard.
    If all of the CSV files are identical:
    use the Excel2Collection plugin ( - Process Type Plugin - EXCEL2COLLECTIONS )
    create a VIEW on the collection (makes it easier elsewhere)
    create a procedure (in a Package) to bulk process it.
    The most important thing is to have, somewhere in the Package (ie your code that is not part of APEX), information that clearly states which columns in the Collection map to which columns in the table, view, and the variables (APEX_APPLICATION.g_fxx()) used for Tabular Forms.
    MK

  • InDesign CC data merge is slow and crashes

    Is there a way to create a data merge in Indesign for a large number of records, and not have it freeze?  I am on PC, using a new computer. I tried reducing the data source to just 6 columns and 5 rows as a test, but it still got hung up. I tried unchecking create overset, and I also tried creating merge to pdf, and .indd. So far any merge I have tried/tested has been unsucessful.
    the client wants serial numbers on a small sticker like product to place on their inventory.
    4000 serial numbers, 6 times each, and I set up a file with 300 per sheet
    Is this possible, or will another program handle this?  OR Is there a script, OR am I doomed to to input the serial numbers myself, with the copy/paste and find/replace as my new best friend?
    The numbers are not in numerical order, a typical number is WFC100652.

    I was having the same problem while trying to do a merge of 7,000 records.  The computer would run slow and the program would crash after a hour of so. I then did the 500 records at a time, but that was taking to long and its ridiculous to have to do that in the first place.  I checked my data file as suggested on the message boards and it was fine, with no errors found.  I tried a workaround and to my amazement, it worked fine.  I realized that the program didn't crash when I did a preview of the intended merge.  What I did was, on the DATA MERGE tab, I did a PREVIEW of my merged data.  I checked through the "merged" documents and they looked fine.  I was even able to change a mistake that I found.  I then choose EXPORT TO PDF from the pull down menu (instead of CREATE MERGED DOCUMENT) and it created my PDF of 7,000 merged documents fine in less than 2 minutes.  I was then able to open up the PDF and print it out without any problems.  Since then, i've done jobs of 8, 9 and 12,000 records without any problems using the PREVIEW method.

  • Data extraction very slow

    Hello All,
    I am trying to extract data from init 2lis_11_vaitm. But, extraction is very very slow. Total data in init set-up table are only 200k.
    One thing I noticed is that we changed the extractor to increase a no. of fields to 225. All these fields were available in the BI content delivered communication extract structure of 2lis_11_vaitm  in ECC.
    Is it because of large nos of fields being extracted from ECC. 200k records are being extracted..It has been 38 hrs..and so far only 140K records are extracted.
    Could you please suggest, how I can improve extraction performance.
    We will be moving this to production. I am afraid that much larger nos of records in production will take for ever to extract.
    Thanks
    Shailini

    Yes you are right, IO = input and output, and generally reference to the data loading capability
    BASIS will help to monitor the data loading capability.
    They will help to check the sizing document, prepared before system go launch,  to check the "designed capability". BASIS guys need to do some test on data loading before system go launch.
    And they will help to check the log to find some problems during data loading.
    In bi 7 statistics you can find some information about that load. Discuss with the basis guys, they can help to analysis the problem without the BI statistics.
    The system on hand do no load from 2lis_12_vcitm. But here is some information for your reference:
    1. Production Server: 26K records, load to 2LIS_03_BF, takes 58s in all
    2. Testing Server: 1.5 Million records, full load to 0FI_GL_10, Runtime 34m 12s

  • Data guard-- very slow replication.

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing problem in an Oracle 10G R1 data guard implementation running on Solaris 10 64bit platform.
    The primary database site has got 2 Sun servers running on RAC while the parallel standby site has got exactly the
    same hardware. A LOGICAL standby policy is in use.
    ->>>The standby database is taking some 30 mintutes to get 10-15 new insertions from the primary database, ironically the system is not under production so no question about systemload.
    * How can I tune the data replication time gap between the primary site and the standby site.
    * Any pointer to some documentation 'd be highly appreciated.
    Many thanks
    Nitin

    Hi NItin,
    Here is my Logical standby: SQL Apply too slow on this matter.
    Did you make any changes to following settings of logical standby parameters:
    EAGERSIZE
    PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS
    APPLY_SERVERS
    LCR Cache size i.e. MAX_SGA
    Please read before Note:603361.1 and Note:312434.1.
    Please let me know if you decide to change something. I can advise some more or less appropriate values but you need to test them thoroughly.
    Best Regards,
    Alex

  • BPC 10 - EPM data retrieval very slow!

    Hi BPCers,
    We are using an Excel EPM Input Schedules as a Resource Management tool - using VBA to provide the functionality we need.
    Performance is generally good, but quickly deteriorates when handling larger data sets - even 500-600 rows of transactional data is enough to slow data retrieval from our BPC Cube to EPM to an unusable speed. This is in relative terms pretty small so  there should be some option for optimisation.
    Does anybody have any experience with this? All suggestions welcome. We are operating on EPM Service Pack 7 Patch 1, but I'm not sure that EPM is necessarily the problem here.
    Thanks,
    Tom

    Thanks Gersh,
    Had a look through fiddler and have identified the job that is causing the delay - some rooting around in the ABAP debugger produced the answer as to why adding more data slows processing speed so dramatically.
    When we take data from the back end, we select a couple of parameters which limit the range of data that we are pulling through - a certain set of people, and a certain range of days. Once this is pulled through, allocations are made to any combination of person and day within this range, which generates and extra two properties - a project ID and a work status.
    This makes 4 properties, and when BPC pulls data it attempts to find every combination of every one of the properties that exist within this range - so the more allocations made the more this slows down as it dramatically increases the number of combinations.
    The result is that BPC runs through a couple of hundred thousand generated tables, most of which are nonsense.
    Not sure what to do from here. This is how BPC reads data so approaching a fix could be difficult.
    Tom

  • Large SGA issue-- insert data is very slow--Who can help me?

    I set the max_sga_size to 10G,and db_cache_size to 8G, but the value of db_cache_size is negative number in OEM, and also I found that the data inserting was very slow, I checked the OS, found no CPU consuming and no IO consuming.
    The OS is HP-UX B11.23 ia64.
    Oracle server 9.2.0.7
    Physical memory : 64G
    CPU: 8
    (oracle server and os are all 64-bit).
    If I decrease the SGA to 3G,and db_cache_size to 2G, and the same data inserting is very fast, everything is well.
    so I guess if there are some os parameters needed to set for using LARGE memory.
    Who know this issue or who has the experience of using large SGA in HP-UX ?
    Message was edited by:
    user548543

    Sounds like you might have a configuration issue on the o/s side.
    Check that kernel parameters are set as recommended in the installation guide
    The first thing that came to mind after reading the problem description was that you might have too low SHMMAX for that 10GB SGA, which would cause multiple shm segments to be created and thus explain the performance degration you're experiencing.
    A quick way to check if that's the case would be doing "ipcs -m" to see if there are multiple shm segments when SGA is set to 10GB.

  • Why does my data logging program slow down after a while?

    A data logging program created with Labview 5.1. Slows down after a few weeks and creates files in the Temp. directory.Computer is Siemens Scenic pro 124 MB ram and AT-MIO-16XE50 Data acquisition board. Also using Solartron Dig. probes and Fieldpoint units.

    Any chance that you are using Win 95/88/ME? Those OS's have well documented
    memory leaks which will consume all your available memory if an application
    is run long enough. Also there are some issues of memory management within
    LabView in the allocation of memory.
    The solution to the first is to switch to WinNT/2K. The second will be much
    more difficult.
    On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 03:19:12 -0800 (PST), Freek wrote:
    >A data logging program created with Labview 5.1. Slows down after a
    >few weeks and creates files in the Temp. directory.Computer is Siemens
    >Scenic pro 124 MB ram and AT-MIO-16XE50 Data acquisition board. Also
    >using Solartron Dig. probes and Fieldpoint units.
    ===========================================================================
    SolidW
    orks Research Partner National Instruments Alliance Member
    Christopher Dubea Phone: (504) 847-2280
    Vice President of Engineering Fax: (504) 847-2282
    Moving Parts L.L.C. email: [email protected]
    P. O. Box 6117 URL: http://www.movingpart.com
    Slidell, LA 70469-6117

  • I have 4 Bars, LTE is connected, But iPhone no data or VERY slow data

    Hi, I have an iphone 5s.  I have chatted and reached out to verizon about 8 times because weirdly my phone will have signal, show its connected to LTE. but data won't work.  If i turn LTE off- the phone works fine.  I've reset the phone, got a replacement sim card and am having the same issue. 
    today, data is working but its so slow... It's slower than 3G.  I actually tested this by loading a youtube video LOL.  The weird part is my coworker has a samsung galaxy s4... and is not having the same issue.  IS this a known issue with iPhones?
    I have a replacement phone on the way; but what could cause this?  I have had this phone for just under 2 months and havent had any accidents or dropped it.

    I came up on your post, I too am experiencing the same thing.  I got the new iPhone 5s on SAT and today I started having no connection issues but the phone would say I have 3 to 4 bars of signal.  I ran speed test one minute I would have 67 ping and 12MB download then it would drop to .02MB and 100 ping in the same spot in the room. I can restart the device and it will run well for about 2 min then it craps out.  I have the unlimited data package and my droid phone never had this problem Im thinking of taking this thing back.

  • Data transfer extremely slow

    My wifi network seems to be very slow in transferring data - Airplay on ATV or file exchange between macs is extremely slow. Playing Airplay video from iOS to ATV is worse than watching Youtube. My internal network appears slower than my internet connection.
    Any suggestion on what I should check or reset? Thanks
    It is a provider's Huawei modem and an Airport Extreme router, distance few meters. I will not wire devices:)

    Please also note that using a "speed test service" like speedtest.net or other is a measurement of your WAN link, ie from your router's WAN interface to the specified test location. This is not a measurement of throughput to your "client device".  These results would be the same between your wireless client connected at a poor 1Mbps speed and your 1Gbps wired desktop.  Do not use these types of services as a measurement of throughput of your internal infrastructure.
    Keep in mind file transfers in windows (like copy and paste to a file share) utilizes Microsoft's SMB/SMB2 protocol which is very chatty and very inneficient.  This is not a good throughput test.  Utilizing a pure TCP transfer method, like FTP, would give more realistic results.  Even better would be to utilize an application like iPerf to perform pure tcp/udp throughput testing.
    Also, Microsoft tends to display transfers in terms of MegaBytes, rather than MegaBits.  Your 100Mbps (megabit) internet would provide a potential throughput of 12.5 MegaBytes.  The same as on your LAN.  When you're copying a file to a share and it's going at 2megaBytes per second, this is actually 16 megabits per second.  So, your client connected at 54Mbps, half-duplex, realizing a throughput of probably around 20-25mbps is actually doing pretty good to get 2-3 megabytes of transfer speed using SMB file transfers.
    Unless you have true tcp throughput tests prior to changes and after changes, the data you have provided thus far is not indicative of poor performance.

  • CRio data logging too slow

    Hi,
    I am using a cRio 9074 in scan mode and I have a fairly simple timed loop that should run at 5-10mSec periods to operate a pwm control. I also need to do some data logging and save two input signals (at approx. 1kS/sec). However, when I use write to spreadsheet, the loop speed drops and my timed loop period goes up to 50mSec. How can I speed this up, and what is the efficient way to save data in scan mode.
    Thanks.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    The single best way to improve determinism is to divide your acquisition/logging into two distinct producer/consumer loops as VTHokie says. Next best improvement would probably be using a binary format file structure rather than Write to Spreadsheet, which converts all data to ASCII representation prior to writing to file. Writing to ASCII files rather than binary files degrades performance in four ways:
    CPU must be used to do the number to text conversion
    ASCII represented numbers lose precision and don't exactly convert back to original data
    The filesize is larger
    When you go to read the file, it's slower for the above three reasons
    On the other hand, an ASCII file is more portable - e.g., you can easily import into a third-party spreadsheet analysis program. But who in their right mind would export data OUTSIDE of LabVIEW when it offers best-in-industry analysis tools?
    a.lia-user-name-link[href="/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88938"] {color: black;} a.lia-user-name-link[href="/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88938"]:after {content: '';} .jrd-sig {height: 80px; overflow: visible;} .jrd-sig-deploy {float:left; opacity:0.2;} .jrd-sig-img {float:right; opacity:0.2;} .jrd-sig-img:hover {opacity:0.8;} .jrd-sig-deploy:hover {opacity:0.8;}

  • I show 5 full 3G bars but data is either SLOW or not available for iphone 4

    I am having 3G data problems in Parkersburg WV, specifically the downtown tower. It will show 5 full 3G bars out in the middle of the parking lot or in a building and the 3G data is either VERY SLOW or says cannot connect. Edge is way faster, at least 20 times faster. We both have the new iphone 4, and 3gs users I talk to are having no problems. What is strange is it is only the one tower/location, every other place we go it works perfect. I had a ticket in and they looked at the tower and said it was fine, and they went ahead and reset it anyways and we are still having the problem. Apple says it is not an issue with the phone since it works on every other tower, and AT&T says its not their problem because they show nothing wrong and other non-iphone 4 owners have no problem. Any thoughts? I have tried the SIM, hard restart, turning off wifi and blu-tooth, having AT&T re-establish my iphone to their system and last but not least restoring the iphone to factory. If anyone gets anything to work please post.

    I have moved this issue to the following thread:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2478946&tstart=0

Maybe you are looking for