Data modeling tool: physical model migration

Hi,
I have imported my relational model with a generated physical model for oracle 9i.
I'd like to migrate my DB to oracle 10g, but I don't feel like creating a new physical model for Oracle 10g from the scratch and configuring it all.
Is there any way to copy that oracle 9i physical model into an oracle 10g model? I know there could be any implementation change from 9i to 10g, but at least copy the main 99% (and warn about the 1% impossible to replicate in 10g).
Could this feature be taken into the production version?
By the way, is this a BUG? when I start the tool, my oracle 9i physical model is not shown in the tree, and I've to right-click over physical model, press open, and then select oracle 9i, to be shown in the tree. But I close the data modeling tool, and when I start again, there is no physical model shown in the tree :(
thanks a lot in advance, I'm evaluating the tool.

Thank you very much for your reply, and hearing those news makes me very happy, because I'm evaluating the product and I miss some functionality like that.
By the way, where can I find the new functionality or the fixed one that is going to be on the production release? Or could yo send it to me by email or any other way? I'm very interested in it.

Similar Messages

  • Data modeler saving Physical model changes not saved

    I am using version 2.0.0.584.
    The bug fix list contains: 8722310: Save does not save physical model changes
    Hovever I still see unexpected behaviour.
    I created a physical model for "Oracle database 10g" and allocated a couple of tables to a different tablespace.
    I saved the physical model via Physical model--> right mouse button --> save all.
    I saved the model with File--> save
    I close the model.
    After opening, the physical model is not available anymore.
    After Physical model--> right mouse button --> open (for Oracle 10g) the contents are not the same anymore.
    Tablespaces with name "TableSpace3" and "TableSpace4" are added and objects belong to this tablespace.
    We do not have currently a workaround for this behaviour.
    Can anyone help?
    Thanks
    Edited by: 793016 on 06-Sep-2010 03:10
    Edited by: 793016 on Sep 6, 2010 12:14 PM

    Hi Philip,
    default tablespaces were defined and I removed this. It did not have a positive effect.
    Checking the log files was a good idea.
    The log file contained errors about files which could not be found on the system.
    I will do some additional tests and let you know.
    Thanks.
    Kind regards,
    Maurice

  • Table properties doesn't propagate from Relational Model to physical model

    Hi all,
    I have a relationnal model with several tables and several schema.
    When i create a new table in the relational model with a specified schema, the table is created on the physicla model, but the schema is not prapagate.
    Is there a way to do this automatically ?
    Or do i have to specify the schema on the relationnal and on the physical.
    Thank you

    Hi,
    schema object in relational model needs to be implemented in physical model - user is the implementation of schema in Oracle physical model. User has property "implements schema". You also can omit this redirection and can assign directly user to table but in this case you'll lose the flexibility.
    Here is how DDL is impacted using different option (schema_1 and table_1 in relational model):
    1) physical model is not open - no implementation details
    CREATE TABLE Schema_1.TABLE_1
         Column_1 NUMBER
    ;2) physical model is open - Schema_1 is not implemented
    CREATE TABLE TABLE_1
         Column_1 NUMBER
        ) LOGGING
    ;3) physical model is open - Schema_1 is implemented by User1
    CREATE TABLE User1.TABLE_1
         Column_1 NUMBER
        ) LOGGING
    ;4) physical model is open - Schema_1 is implemented by User1; Table_1 is directly assigned to User2 in physical model
    CREATE TABLE User2.TABLE_1
         Column_1 NUMBER
        ) LOGGING
    ;Philip

  • Difference between OBIEE Logical Modelling and physical modelling

    HI.
    what is the difference between logical modeling (BMM) and physical modelling(Physical layer) in obiee admin tool
    please narrate it in definition format
    thank you
    rakesh

    Hi rakesh,
    Administrator tool consists of 3 layers
    Physcial layer:-It is typically first layer built in the repository.Contains objects representing the physical data sources to which the BI server submits queries.It may conatin multiple data sources.The common way is to import metadat from different databases.You can define joins after import if they are not defined.
    Business model and mapping layer:-It is defined as business or logical models of data and specifies the mapping between the physical and business layers.This is where the physical schemas are simplified to form the basis for the end user.We can say data is seperated into facts and dimension tables
    Presentation layer:-simplifies and organizes the business model to make it easy for users to understand and query
    go through the user guides for all the definition and subject
    Hope it helps you.my points?
    By,
    Kranthi
    Edited by: Kranthi.K on Sep 1, 2009 10:22 PM

  • Threat Modeling Tool 2014 - modeling an FTP connection

    What king of connection or Flow should I be using to model an FTP connection using the new Threat Modeling tool?
    Thanks in advance.

    Does anyone have an answer for this?
    From MSDN forums.

  • Physical model disabled

    I'm trying to create a Partition using sql developer/modeler
    my physical model all the options or disabled(greyed out) when it is connected to live database how do I over come this

    Hi,
    You need to open the Physical Model properties dialog for the Table (from the Physical model part of the Browser tree) and set the Partitioned property (on its General tab) to YES.
    You will then be able to use the Partitioning tab in this dialog, to set Partitioning type and other Partitioning properties.
    Also, after you've closed this dialog, you can create Partition instances by selecting New from the right-click menu for the Partitions node (subordinate to the Table's node in the Physical model part of the tree).
    David

  • SQL Dev Data Modeller:  Auto-generate Surrogate PKs in the Physical Model ?

    How can I have the logical modeller allow the user to design with logical PKs, but then have surrogate primary keys be auto-generated off sequences by the modeller when it comes to create the physical model - as in conventional application design?
    Without this facility, this tool is useless, IMO.
    I want:
    i). sequences to become the physical PKs by default, and that what were the logical PKs in the logical model, to become a unique key in the physical model.
    ii). I want this set by default when generating the physical model....
    iii). ....with an option to turn this off on a entity-by-entity basis (as not all tables will necessarily require such a surrogate PK; so the logical PK may remain the physical PK).

    It is common practice that physical PKs in Oracle tables are defined from sequences (surrogate PKs), and that the logical PK from the entity becomes a unique key in the table.
    This may not always be the case in every application out there, and some people may disagree, but it is nonetheless a needed feature.
    My new Feature Request is therefore:
    I would like to see the following additions to the product.
    1. In the Preferences -> Data Modeler -> Model -> Logical, a flag that by default indicates whether the designer wishes to opt to enable this feature (ie; have all logical PKs converted to unique keys, and replaced by sequence nos. in the physical model). This flags needs to be there since in real life, albeit erroneously IMO, some people will choose not to opt to use this functionality.
    2. On every entity created in the model, there needs to be a flag that allows to override this default option, as not every table will require a surrogate PK to be generated. Being able to (re)set a flag located on the entity properties (perhaps under 'Engineer To'), will accomplish this.
    3. When Forward Engineering to the physical model from the logical, the following should happen.
    ENTITY  1 ---------->TABLE 1
    ---------------------> P * Surrogate PK
    * Attribute 1 -----> U * Column 1
    * Attribute 2 -----> U * Column 2
    o Attribute 3 ----------> Column 3
    Here you can see,
    - Attributes 1 & 2 (the logical PK) of the entity become a unique key in the table (columns 1 & 2),
    - optional Attribute 3 becomes NULLable column 3,
    - and a physical surrogate PK column is added (type unbounded INTEGER, PRIMARY KEY constraint added).
    From entity DEPT as:   (Examples based on SCOTT schema)
    DEPTNO NUMBER(2) NOT NULL <-- Logical primary key on entity
    DNAME VARCHAR2(14)
    LOC VARCHAR2(13)
    CREATE TABLE DEPT
    (PK_DEPT INTEGER, -- New column becomes surrogate physical PK, driven from sequence defined later
    DEPTNO NUMBER(2) NOT NULL, -- Former logical PK becomes a UK
    DNAME VARCHAR2(14),
    LOC VARCHAR2(13))
    ALTER TABLE DEPT
    ADD CONSTRAINT PK_DEPT PRIMARY KEY (PK_DEPT) USING INDEX PCTFREE 0
    ALTER TABLE DEPT
    ADD CONSTRAINT UKLPK_DEPTNO UNIQUE (DEPTNO) USING INDEX PCTFREE 0 -- Former logical PK becomes a UK (constraint name reflects this)
    CREATE SEQUENCE PK_DEPT_SEQ
    CREATE TRIGGER PK_DEPT_SEQ_TRG
    BEFORE INSERT ON DEPT
    FOR EACH ROW
    WHEN (new.PK_DEPT IS NULL)
    BEGIN
    SELECT PK_DEPT_SEQ.NEXTVAL
    INTO :new.PK_DEPT
    FROM DUAL;
    -- Or from 11g onwards, simply,
    :new.PK_DEPT := PK_DEPT_SEQ.NEXTVAL;
    END;
    From entity EMP as:
    EMPNO NUMBER(4) NOT NULL -- Logical primary key on entity
    ENAME VARCHAR2(10)
    JOB VARCHAR2(9)
    MGR NUMBER(4)
    HIREDATE DATE
    SAL NUMBER(7,2)
    COMM NUMBER(7,2)
    DEPTNO NUMBER(2)
    CREATE TABLE EMP
    (PK_EMP INTEGER, -- New column becomes surrogate physical PK, driven from sequence defined later
    FK_DEPT INTEGER, -- New FK to surrogate PK in DEPT table (maybe NOT NULL depending on relationship with parent)
    EMPNO NUMBER(4) NOT NULL, -- Former logical PK becomes a UK
    ENAME VARCHAR2(10),
    JOB VARCHAR2(9),
    MGR NUMBER(4),
    HIREDATE DATE,
    SAL NUMBER(7,2),
    COMM NUMBER(7,2),
    DEPTNO NUMBER(2))
    ALTER TABLE EMP
    ADD CONSTRAINT PK_EMP PRIMARY KEY (PK_EMP) USING INDEX PCTFREE 0
    ALTER TABLE EMP
    ADD CONSTRAINT FK_DEPT FOREIGN KEY (FK_DEPT) REFERENCES DEPT (PK_DEPT)
    ALTER TABLE EMP
    ADD CONSTRAINT UKLPK_EMPNO UNIQUE (EMPNO) USING INDEX PCTFREE 0 -- Former logical PK becomes a UK (constraint name reflects this)
    CREATE SEQUENCE PK_EMP_SEQ
    CREATE TRIGGER PK_EMP_SEQ_TRG
    BEFORE INSERT ON EMP
    FOR EACH ROW
    WHEN (new.PK_EMP IS NULL)
    BEGIN
    SELECT PK_EMP_SEQ.NEXTVAL
    INTO :new.PK_EMP
    FROM DUAL;
    -- Or from 11g onwards, simply,
    :new.PK_EMP := PK_EMP_SEQ.NEXTVAL;
    END;
    [NOTE:   I use PCTFREE 0 to define the index attributes for the primary & unique keys since the assumption is that they will in general not get updated, thereby allowing for the denser packing of entries in the indexes and the (albeit minor) advantages that go with it.
    This is certainly always true of a sequence-driven primary key (as it is by its very nature immutable), but if the unique key is likely to be frequently updated, then this PCTFREE option could be user-configurable on a per table basis (perhaps under Table Properties -> unique Constraints).
    For non-sequence-driven primary keys, this storage option could also appear under Table Properties -> Primary Key.
    I notice no storage options exist in general for objects, so you may like to consider adding this functionality overall].
    Associated Issues :
    - Preferences, 'Naming Standard: Templates' should be updated to allow for the unique key/constraint to be called something different, thus highlighting that it comes from the logical PK. I've used 'UKLPK' in this example.
    - Mark the physical PK as being generated from a sequence; perhaps a flag under Table Properties -> Primary Key.
    - When Forward Engineering, if an entity exists without a logical PK, the forward engineering process should halt with a fatal error.
    !!! MODERATOR PLEASE DELETE ME !!!

  • Data Model Exporting - MDM to Erwin or another data model tool

    I would like to export the latest MDM physical data model in production to any erwin modelling tool or any othe data modelling tool

    To export the schema of an MDM repository to an XML file:
           1.      In the Console Hierarchy tree, right-click on the MDM repository whose schema you want to export and choose Export Repository Schema from the context menu, or select the tree node and choose Repositories ® Export Schema from the main menu.
    If the top-right pane is currently displaying the list of MDM repositories, you can also right-click on the repository in the grid and choose Export Schema from the context menu.
           2.      Click Save to close the dialog and export the schema.
    Schema files are stored in XML format in a user-defined location using a user-defined filename. The file contains the schema definition only; no table or field content.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/f2/2f21039e9146098e7b238f1a4c8e5e/content.htm
    Thanks,
    Shambhu.

  • Oracle Data Modeling tool interoperability with QDesigner models.

    Hello,
    Would it be possible to get some information on how Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeler works with models from other data modeling tools such as QDesigner.
    How can Quest QDesigner read the .cdm (conceptual data models) and the .pdm (physical data models) from QDesigner.
    Regards,
    Mary

    SQL Developer Data Modeler does not work with QDesigner models.
    Sue

  • Data Modeler: is it possible to compare physical models?

    Hello,
    We're looking for a new Data Modeling tool, as we will abandon Designer (for many different reasons...). The SQL Developer Data Modeling-tool looks very promising. Especially the "compare models" -tool looks interesting to create change-scripts for new implementations. What I don't find, however, is the possibility to generate typical physical attritutes, like permissions (resulting in grant-statements), tablespaces. Is this available? Is it possible at all? For your information: I've just downloaded the EAR 2 (version 1.5.1 build 525)
    Thanks in advance for your reply,
    Peter

    Peter,
    I would like to echo your feature request. I too spent many years with Designer and until SDDM came along, I was still using it for server model diagrams mostly. We always wanted to make sure that we have a record (model) of what was in a schema. We deploy to MANY environments - several for development, various phases of testing etc. and of course production and clones of production. It's really nice to run a utility of some sort that compares my model to an implementation. I might compare the same model to half a dozen environments. It helps me quickly pinpoint differences that aren't expected.
    I also like to ability to compare models with each other. We're all looking forward to the future of data modeling with SDDM!
    In some ways, SDDM is already ahead in the features department. I can version models in Subversion with the XML files. That’s HUGE!
    Maggie Tompkins, USMC

  • Data Modeler bug? - it keeps reporting missing physical model files

    Hi,
    I'm having a rather serious problem with the latest data modeler, Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeler 3.1.4.710. It keeps losing physical model files for some reason.
    I started to notice that it was not generating all the tables in my small design. After hours of struggle I found multiple error messages in the log file:
    2012-12-18 10:51:20,126 [Thread-71] ERROR XMLTransformationManager - Unable to load object from XML: C:\cygwin\home\Brian\codebase\models\data\Design\rel\395D160B-C7224B8EAD05\phys\D9582E4E-2ED963CB9D32\View\seg_0\A555DB9B-8864-9C0B-DCA8-BAC5231F55C6.xml
    java.io.FileNotFoundException: C:\cygwin\home\Brian\codebase\models\data\Design\rel\395D160B-C7224B8EAD05\phys\D9582E4E-2ED963CB9D32\View\seg_0\A555DB9B-8864-9C0B-DCA8-BAC5231F55C6.xml (The system cannot find the path specified)
         at java.io.FileInputStream.open(Native Method)
         at java.io.FileInputStream.<init>(FileInputStream.java:138)
         at oracle.dbtools.crest.model.metadata.XMLToObjectTransformer.transformToObject(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.dbtools.crest.model.metadata.XMLToObjectTransformer.transformToObject(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.dbtools.crest.model.metadata.XMLTransformationManager.transformFromXMLToObject(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.dbtools.crest.model.metadata.XMLTransformationManager.openPhysicalModel(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.dbtools.crest.model.metadata.XMLTransformationManager.openPhysicalModel(Unknown Source)
         at oracle.dbtools.crest.swingui.browser.BrowserPanel$88.run(Unknown Source)
    These messages appeared every time I opened my physical model (Oracle 10g).
    After deleting and recreating the physical model the problem went away for a while. But after closing and reopening the design I started to see the errors again.
    Has anyone seen something similar?
    Regards,
    Brian

    Thanks Philip!
    The workaround does the trick for the tables, primary keys and unique keys.
    I have just observed that table level constraints show a slightly different behaviour.
    Names show up like TCC5, TCC6, etc.
    Seems the same problem as previously in SQL*Modeler forgets check constraint names
    Is there a workaround for that problem too ?
    I already noticed that there is no parameter NameChanged for a table constraint.
    Enrico

  • Data Tools Platform Model Base (1.5.0.200707041) requires feature "org.ecl

    While I'm trying to use the getting started guide for Plugin DTP the following erroe occurs......
    Data Tools Platform Model Base (1.5.0.200707041) requires feature "org.eclipse.emf (2.2.0)", or later version.
    This the download from the Oracle Site up to date?
    Thanks in advance
    Simon

    Did you try the steps 7 & 8 of section 2.2 in http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/eclipse/dtp/files/gettingstarted.html ?

  • Physical Model Data Type Issue

    Hi,
    I have created ware house tables using E-business suite tables for general ledger model and exported into physical model. I could see all my keys/IDs which were numbers have been converted into decimal.
    Ex: journal_id in my oracle table is number (ex:1234). But when I exported into OBIEE and used view data option. All the IDs(data type number) data is showing as decimal format (1234.00).
    Ex: If I want to see data for check number in answers, then it is showing as 112456.00 instead of 112456.
    Please anyone had this kind of issue. how to resolve?
    Is there any default setting which is causing this problem.how to find?
    OBIEE version : 10.1.3.2
    Appreciate your help.

    Hi Sandeep,
    When I opened the rpd in offline mode, it is saying the repository can only be opened as Read-Only. I clicked Yes for this and entered admin user name and password. But in Physical model, when I right clicked any table, I couldnt see find any place to modify. I tried with properties also. I am not able change data type as it read-only. How to do it in offline?
    FYI,
    I opened rpd when OC4J was stopped. Aslo I opened when OC4J is running. But both times I am not able to change datat type.
    Thanks!!

  • Export import  in sql developer data modeling tool

    I tried sql developer data modeling tool
    but i have a proble
    i select file&gt; import &gt; data dictionary
    then created a connection to db and selected some tables and got the er digram successfully
    then i goto file &gt; export&gt;to data modeling design and save it to xml file
    but when i give this file to another developer and he imported the file File&gt;import&gt;data modeling design
    the digram is not displayed
    is it a bug or im doing something wrong

    ok it was my fault
    it's not the xml only
    there is a folder with the same name bside the xml file and should be included within the exchange

  • Data modeling tool to design a dwh - SQL Server 2008 R2-2012

    Hi,
    I need to know if it exists a Microsoft tool to model the data structures of a data warehouse. I generally use the SQL Server diagrams but I'd like to know an enhanced tool. Visio?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You could download a 60 day free trial of Visio; -
    http://office.microsoft.com/en-gb/visio/visio-professional-2013-free-trial-flowchart-software-FX103791368.aspx
    Have a look at a related link; -
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/620009b1-9625-4e1f-8574-f4049718ffe2/shapestemplates-bi-for-visio
    Kind Regards,
    Kieran.
    Kieran Patrick Wood http://www.innovativebusinessintelligence.com http://uk.linkedin.com/in/kieranpatrickwood http://kieranwood.wordpress.com/

Maybe you are looking for

  • MSI Big Bang Xpower II SLI slowness

    Hello. I just purchased the big bang xpower ii to change from Asus RIVE. Had trouble with bios 2.5 (no sound) and reverted to 2.4. In both bios, using a 4930k and a SLI of 780ti, I am seeing slowness in certain games like Crysis 3 in some scenes. In

  • Issues in Filter (F4 help) window

    We have several reports which has issues with the filter (F4 help) window. when any user wants to filter the reports these filter window show blank screen with message " Please Wait".  Filter window never displays values and keeps processing This iss

  • Mail 2.1.3 (753.1/753) locks up when creating new account window

    Apple Mail lets you create a new blank account window in Mail -> Preferences... -> Accounts by holding the [alt] key and clicking [+]. Creating a new, blank account window lets you avoid using the annoying "wizard" that launches if you simply click t

  • Updated ios and phone is locked

    Can someone help me please? Last night I updated to the latest IOS and the phone said it failed, so I restored the phone. This morning when I got up, my phone was locked and my code doesn't work any more. I connected to iTunes thinking that if I upda

  • SPD 2010 won't overwrite existing workflow but creates a new version instead

    When editing then saving and publishing an existing SharePoint Designer workflow a new version of the workflow is created but the previous version is still available in the SharePoint list for a user to select and start manually. Example: The origina