Database Size Incresing Fastly

In our Database ,Their only one master Table and 250 tables r logically connected to that master table.
Only master table contains Primary Kye.
So we are doing Indexing daily for faster performace.
Before some days database size is 10 gb and now it is 50 gb and the Database size is till incresing fastly.
I am not able to find out the problem that why database size incresing fastly.
And even i m not able find out logical connection between the table.
I have done shriking and re - indexing but still i m not able to resolve the problem.
How can i analyse that why database is incresing....
I m using SQL Server 2005.......
Thanks & Regards
Prash

I am not able to find out the problem that why database size incresing fastly.
And even i m not able find out logical connection between the table.
I have done shriking and re - indexing but still i m not able to resolve the problem.
How can i analyse that why database is incresing....You must understand your application first and then can find out what data is growing rapidly..
Bear in mind this is Oracle Database Forum. No MSSQL Questions.

Similar Messages

Lightroom 3 database size increases fast

Hello,
Last week one of my Lightroom databases had a size of 400MB. After I installed some new hardware components last weekend I continued to work in that same database and three days later the size had increased up to 800MB. I didn't import any new images. I just worked on several files, added some Adjustment Brushes and created 1:1 previews for a small part of the images in this catalog.
What is causing this increase in file size? Which info is actually stored inside these lrcat-files? What about the History, where is that info stored?
Can I create a new catalog from scratch and keep the settings and changes, using Export as Catalog?
Thanks!
Serge

I discovered the following: some of my DNG files to which I added several adjustment brushes with lots of strokes are increasing to 80MB. Some even to 100MB! This may be the reason why my LRCAT file is so large, every step in history is saved inside. Because I made several small and large strokes may explain the size of the file?
Those DNG files were converted from my Nikon D3 NEF files and are basically 12-15MB per file, so no original RAW file was embedded.
The catalog I'm talking about here contains about 800 DNG and 100 PSD files and is at this moment 300MB in size (lrcat only).
I attached a screenshot, I hope it is readable? So what did I do this particular image? I restored this file from my backup where this file had a size of 25MB. I renamed the latest version to filename_Original. I imported the backup file into Lightroom and copied the settings from the original file into the backup file. Result: the backup file is now 28MB in size, which is a lot less than the original at 78MB.
In the meantime I deactivated the option to save changes directly into the XMP file, which may speed up things and keep DNG file size small. Can I avoid such large files by only deactivating this option? Any other tips and suggestions?
Thanks!!

Disk size based on content database size

Hi,
Assuming that by the formulae Database size = ((D × V)
× S)
+ (10 KB × (L +
(V × D)))
my DB size is 105 GB,
what should we recommend be the Hard disk size for creating this data base?
Thank you,
Kotamarthi

Updated but few questions
WFE & App servers : System
Files :80 GB ;ULS & IIS Logs etc:80 : Back up : 160(can vary)
FAST Search : System
Files:80 GB; Search : 300 GB.: ULS Logs : 80 GB.; Back up: 80 GB.
DB Server (current content size is 106 GB): System
Files :80 GB ;MDF: 300 GB;LDF : 100 GB ;Back ups:300 GB(can vary)
Updated the Fast Search with ULS =80 and added back up for 80 GB.
Few Questions.
1.For WFE and App server I have only two Drives one for system and one for Logs are those sufficient? where would the sharepoint files go into? or do w e need to and any other drives.
1.For fast search search drive is 300 GB(this drive would be for indexing/Querying etc? is it fine)
a.on search Server added 80 GB for back up - can you let me know for what purpose can we use this.
2.For DB server , do you mean since we have Drive for LDF logs we dont need drive for ULS log?
thank you,
Vinay

Rebuild Database did not reduce the database size

I just completed a rebuild database. The rebuild completed much quicker than anticipated and in the end the did not reduce in size.
This is my first rebuild and since original installation I have deleted a number of masters. From my understanding thumbnails and previews are not deleted when the master is deleted. In order to delete the thumbnails and previews the db must be rebuilt. Is this correct?
The db is over 31.1gb. The rebuild took approx 10 minutes and when completed the db size was still 31.1gb. There was a message during the rebuild that read "Recovering projects". I was expecting to see stats showing previews and thumbnails being generated in the activity window but don't see it. Has the db been rebuilt?
Thanks for any assistance.

Rebuilding the database is for disaster-recovery, not file maintenance. I certainly wouldn't do it unless something was fundamentally broken and the application didn't run.
"rebuilding" the database seems to do the following:
(1) remove the database file completely (not even to the trash, it destroys the database utterly)
(2) run through the plist files and reconstruct a brand-new database from them all
I checked this (on an empty library) using hard-links from the commandline, and step (1) above scared me sufficiently that I'd only rebuild the database as an absolute last resort.
Now, 31GB seems a lot for a database that only took 10 minutes to rebuild - are you sure you're not telling us the size of the library (to find the database size, right-click on the library and select view-package-contents, then open the 'Aperture.aplib' folder and find the size of the 'Library.apdb' file. That's the file you're changing when you 'rebuild database'.)
If you're telling us the size of the entire aperture library instead, then that size will be completely dominated by the master RAW files you've imported. I'd guess your library will be less than 10MB.
My understanding is that previews are deleted (since they're stored as separate files alongside the master image, if you look in the folder hierarchy), but thumbnails aren't. The thumbnails are aggregated together into one-file-per-project (presumably for speed of access), and I'd guess the space is reclaimed for future use, but the file doesn't get any smaller. That's a classic trade-off for speed-of-access, and users like us are normally very keen on things being fast
-=C=-

SQL azure database size not dropping down after deleting all table

Dear all,
I have a simple database on Azure for which I have deleted all table data. The size of the database is still showing 5Mb of data and I am charge for that. I have heard that this may happen from cluster index getting fragmented.
I have run a querry I found on internet on all my table index to show percentage of fragmentation and all report 0%.
DBA is not so my job but what could it be or how can I reduce that size ?
ON premise I would use COMPACT DB but not available in azure like some others DB action
Thnaks for tips
regards

user created objects/data are not the only ones stored in your database. you got system objects and metadata as Mike mentions above.
are you trying to skip being charged if you're not storing data? looking at the pricing table, you'll still get charged the $4.995 for the 0-100MB database size range.

Tables are deleted but database size does not change in sql server 2008r2

Hi All,
20GB Tables are deleted in my database but database size does not change and disk size showing same size.

Hi ,
I have ran the Disk usage by Top Tables report and Identified couple of tables with unwanted data for last 5 years. I have deleted the data for the first 3 years and then ran the Disk usage by Top Tables report again. When I compared the report before
and after the data deletion, I have noticed certain facts which is not matching with what I know or learned from experts like you. The following are the points where I am looking for clarification:
1.Reserved (KB) has been reduced. I was expecting the data Reserved (KB) will remain the same after the data deletion.
2. The Data(KB) and Indexes(KB) fields have been reduced as expected. The Unused(KB) field have been increased as expected.
I was expecting the total of Data(KB) and Indexes(KB) field space gained will be equal to the Unused(KB) field gained after deleting the data. But that is not the case. When I deducted(subtracted) the difference in the Reserved(KB)(Difference before
and after data deletion) field from the Total of space gained from the data deletion is equal to the Unused(KB) gained field value.
I am not a SQL expert and not questioning but trying to understand whether we really gain space by deleting data from the tables. Also keen to get the concepts right, but my testing by deleting some records confused me.
Looking ahead to all your expert advice.
Thanks,
Vennayat

What is the best practice on mailbox database size in exchange 2013

Hi,
does anybody have any links to good sites that gives some pros/cons when it comes to the mailbox database sizes in exchange 2013? I've tried to google it - but hasn't found any good answers. I would like to know if I really need more than 5 mailbox databases
or not on my exchange environment.

Hi
As far as I know, 2TB is recommended maximum database size for Exchange 2013 databases.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here
Terence Yu
TechNet Community Support

How to get the database size of several system

Hi
We've got a lot of database system on our landscape. I want to make a simple report to get the size the all our database on a weekly base.
I try to get a RZ20 value on it without succes.
Do you know a sql request that i could launch on all my database to get this information ? i did'nt find any V$^view with this information.
thanks for your help
florent

"The database size" can be
- the total size
- the filled size
- the filled size without undo/temp
You can use DBACOCKPIT to centrally manage multiple instance and check the sizes.
Markus

How to determine the database size corresponding to the nber records in DSO

Hi Colleagues,
I would like to determine the database size corresponding to my new BI project.
I know the number of records uploaded in the DSO from the source system for the intialization phase.
How can I deduct the database size / disk size corresponding to the number of record uploaded ?
Thanks,

Hi Ram,
I am with SAP BI Release SAPKW70019
I do not have the option Single Table analysis -
I have in DB02 or ST04 the following options.
*- Space*
-- space overview
->database
--overview
->users
--overview
--detailed analysis
-> tablespaces
--overview
--detailed analysis
-> segments
--overview
--Detailed analysis
--Detailed Analysis Aggregated
-> Additional Functions
--Collector Logs
--BW Analysis
Where should I go through ?
Thanks

Sharepoint 2010 - configuration database size limit

Hi,
We have below scenario in our production farm. Ours is a SharePoint 2010 Enterprise Edition server.
Medium size farm (4 WFE, 4 App Servers, Content DBs in separate tier. No SharePoint search in this farm)
Configuration DB reached 250+ GB. Please clarify below queries.
1. What is the boundary limit for configuration database size?
2. How we can scale the configuration database?
3. Can we add multiple configuration database per farm?
4. What are the best practices and regular maintenance activities to be done to keep the configuration db size under control?
It would be really really great if someone gives some good knowledge in this area.

1) Not aware of one
2) You can add multiple files to the file group
3) No
Is the growth in the MDF or the LDF (log file)? If it is in the log file, are you using high availability (Clustering, Mirroring, Log Shipping, AlwaysOn)? If so, you need to run a BACKUP LOG periodically to maintain the LDF size, or allow you to truncate
the LDF.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Best Trategy to reduce the Database Size

Hi Everyone,
In our Client's Landscape SAP systems have been upgraded to newer versions whereas our client want
one copy of older Production systems (one copy to retain)
1) SAP R/3 4.6 C system (database size of this system is approx 2TB)
2) SAP BW 3.0 (database size of this system is approx 2TB)
Now CLient wants us to reduce the database size via re-organization because Archiving of IDOCs & Links we have already done
Client has recommended for :
1) Oracle Export/Import: Only Oracle DBA can do (ignore this one)
2) Database Reorganization : We have tried Reoragnization via BRtools but found very tedious 9 (ignore this one)
3) SAP Export/Import : Via this way we want to reduce the database size
Can anybody Tell us How much Free space do we require in order at OS level in order to store the Database Export
of Two Databases of size around 4TB & what would be the best strategy of reducing the Dabase size.
Via SAP Export/Import how much approx how much database size will be reduced
Thanks & Regards
Deepak Gosain

Hi,
>Can anybody Tell us How much Free space do we require in order at OS level in order to store the Database Export
>of Two Databases of size around 4TB & what would be the best strategy of reducing the Dabase size.
The only realistic way to know is to do a system copy of the production system on a testbed system and to test the Database Export.
If you really want to decrease the database size you will have to archive a lot more than the IDOC archiving object.
Regards,
Olivier

Best practice on mailbox database size & we need how many server for deployment exchange server 2013

Dear all,
We have an server that runs Microsoft exchange server 2007 with the following specification:
4 servers: Hub&CAS1 & Hub&CAS2 & Mailbox1 & Mailbox2
Operating System : Microsoft Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise x64
6 mailbox databases
1500 Mailboxes
We need to upgrade our exchange server from 2007 to 2013 to fulfill the following requirment:
I want to upgrade the exchange server 2007 to exchange server 2013 and implement the following details:
1500 mailboxes
10GB or 15GB mailbox quota for each user
How many
servers and databases are
required for this migration<ins cite="mailto:Mohammad%20Ashouri" datetime="2014-05-18T22:41"></ins>?
Number of the servers:
Number of the databases:
Size of each database:
Many thanks.

You will also need to check server role requirement in exchange 2013. Please go through this link to calculate the server role requirement : http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/05/14/released-exchange-2013-server-role-requirements-calculator.aspx
2TB is recommended maximum database size for Exchange 2013 databases.
Here is the complete checklist to upgrade from exchange 2007 to 2013 : http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff805032%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx
Meanwhile, to reduce the risks and time consumed during the completion of migration process, you can have a look at this proficient application(http://www.exchangemigrationtool.com/) that would also be
a good approach for 1500 users. It will help you to ensure the data security during the migration between exchange 2007 and 2013.

One of the BizTalk Server processes in the affected computer is being throttled for significant periods because of high database size exceeding the threshold

Hello Experts,
I have complex Biz Talk 2013 farm having 20 servers,15 Hosts. In my production environment even if there is no traffic i am getting throttling errors from SCOM for my all the production hosts.
Error : One of the BizTalk Server processes in the affected computer is being throttled for significant
periods because of high database size exceeding the threshold
I checked following things:
1. MsgBoxDB size 748732 KB
2. Spool table size 53 MB
3. Tracking DB size 26724 KB
4. Host settings -- Message Queue Size = 100, MsgCount = 50000 , Spool MP = 10 , Tracking MP = 10
5. Ran Message Box viewer and did not found any error related to DB size. (which counter i should focus on in MBV)
Note -- for DB i am sharing full backup size because it does not have log file size.
Please suggest where i should focus?
Is SCOM reporting correctly because everything is fine in biztalk ?
Thanks
Yagya
https://www.mcpvirtualbusinesscard.com/VBCServer/card.aspx?tag=YagyaDattMishra&wa=wsignin1.0

Hi Yagyam
I remember this error from SCOM when you use the standard SCOM BizTalk pack.
Check the eventlog of the server, do you see any errors in event log, this could give some clue to the root cause. Whenever you have this alert from SCOM, you must have
some entries in eventlog relating to the alert raised by SCOM.
Is your message processing by BizTalk hosts are normal? Run the performance monitor to see the bottleneck. Check if there is really throttling.
As mentioned in this blog, check the state of the SQL Agent on BizTalk's SQL database server, may be try restart the SQL Agent on BizTalk's SQL database server.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/timdel/archive/2008/11/19/why-i-love-scom.aspx
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

How to increase the database size

Hi All ,
Our Client is going to increase their customers from 3.5 million to 5 millions
(12 millions in future ) and there is no increase in the existing licenses..
At present we have very less space in Data base server. We are Going Live at the End of the Month.
How to increase the database size to meet the Client requirements.
we have to increase the No of Processerors etc...
Below are the details of Servers:
System Model: IBM,7040-681
Machine Serial Number: 830D5BF
Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER4
Number Of Processors: 2
Processor Clock Speed: 1904 MHz
CPU Type: 64-bit
Kernel Type: 64-bit
LPAR Info: 4 bgl-svr-biap
Memory Size: 4096 MB
Good Memory Size: 4096 MB
Note : Server is IBM P690.
1) System Lansdcape --> Two System Landsacpe ( Dev to Prod )
2) BW Version --> 3.5
3) SAP Basis --- > 6.4
4) No of Application servers currently having --> Only One Server
Can any body suggest me how to solve this.....
Thanks in Advance..
Kasi Chukka

Hi Kasi,
Your question is not very clear, from the looks of it, the load on your client's system will be doubling soon.
You need to look at the system stats on how the system is handling the current load, use transactions ST06, ST04 and ST02 to check if the DB hit ratios are as expected, the cpu idle time, the busy periods. Identify if there is large amounts of paging on the server(candidate for increase in real memory).
On AIX level, you will need to look at CPU / Memory usage.
On SAP Application server, you need to look at SAP Buffers.
On Oracle end, look at SGA stats, if it need to increase, the data growth that is current and estimated growth (DB02).
You will not get an exact answer to it, you will need to analyze the existing load and then estimate (guess). The hardware upgrade will also depend on what the client is willing to spend, its always a good practise to add 20% to what you have estimated as these figures are never accurate.
All the best.
Cheers,
Nisch

How to know the database size

can one tell how to find the database size?

Depends what you mean by database size and how you want the output to look?
Are you referring to the number of rows across all tables of a schema? The number of bytes used by the rows? The number of bytes used by the tablespaces? The number of bytes used by the datafiles? etc. etc. etc. So many options.
Be more clear in your requirements please.

Database Size Incresing Fastly

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for