DataGrid broken by screen resolution?!

I have a two column datagrid where the right column is
editable, but the left column is not. I normally work in 1280 by
1024. When trying my application in 1024 by 768, when you go to
edit an entry in the right column, the left column becomes
editable. Has anybody else run into this? Any ideas on how to fix
it?

Found this is dmesg:
hda_intel: Disable MSI for Nvidia chipset
HDA Intel 0000:01:00.1: setting latency timer to 64
usb 1-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2
nvidia: module license 'NVIDIA' taints kernel.
Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
And this is the xorg log:
[ 15.488] (--) NVIDIA(0): CRT-1
[ 15.488] (--) NVIDIA(0): CRT-1: 400.0 MHz maximum pixel clock
[ 15.529] (II) NVIDIA(0): Assigned Display Device: CRT-1
[ 15.529] (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1920x1080@85"; removing.
[ 15.529] (WW) NVIDIA(0):
[ 15.529] (WW) NVIDIA(0): Unable to validate any modes; falling back to the default mode
[ 15.546] (WW) NVIDIA(0): "nvidia-auto-select".
[ 15.546] (WW) NVIDIA(0):
[ 15.546] (II) NVIDIA(0): Validated modes:
[ 15.546] (II) NVIDIA(0): "nvidia-auto-select"
[ 15.546] (II) NVIDIA(0): Virtual screen size determined to be 1024 x 768
[ 15.567] (WW) NVIDIA(0): Unable to get display device CRT-1's EDID; cannot compute DPI
Don't know if it's relevant.
Last edited by pWneD (2010-11-21 23:16:24)

Similar Messages

1280x800 screen resolution is missing...

Hello. I just purchased a Mac Mini, and I'm using it without a monitor attached. Instead, we use it as a media server in our house, and we access it using a remote connection (Chicken of the VLC).
Unfortunately, I cannot get the Mac Mini's screen size to match my Macbook Pro, which is requiring painfully annoying scrolling in the virtual window. I can't change the Mac Mini's screen resolution to 1280x800, because that option is not available. How can I add that resolution to the list of possible options without a physical monitor attached?
I've looked at DisplayConfigX and SwitchResX but neither will do the trick without a monitor attached. Anyone have any ideas?

Unfortunately I am pretty certain that the resolution list used for headless configurations resides in firmware somewhere, not a normal file in the OS X file system. As such, it can't be written to with programs like DCX and SRX. This question comes up occasionally on this forum and I have never seen a good answer for it.
All you really need is for the mini to see a valid display ID. That can be done with something like a DVI Detective from Gefen, but that's an expensive way to go. I you have an old, broken monitor, you could rip out the interface board and hang it off the mini's video port. With many such boards the EDID circuit block will take power from the auxiliary power pin on the video cable so the board wouldn't need a power supply of its own in order to power up the EDID and comm channel. That's also a heavy hammer solution but could be cheaper if you can get a broken monitor for free somewhere.

Screen resolution problem for components in a canvas

Hi,
I am developing a Flex application, and I am using more than
one canvases in a single page(with in application tag).
And one canvas has elements like Chart, datagrid, legent
& a label.
Width & Height I gave to canvas and all its elements
(except legend & label) is in percentages
The problem I am facing is that,
when I change the screen resolution, and
when I press F11(full screen) in IE, the all objects except
legend & label are increasing/decreasing, and in some cases
lagend & label are overlapping in the chart & data grid.
Could anybody please advise what I need to follow to
eliminate these kind of problems.
Thanks in advance.
Pavan

Ooooooh, haha my bad, I didn't realize you were talking about
relative positioning on your app.
Here's what's happening. Your component/application is in
ABSOLUTE layout mode, so you can specify coordinates for where
controls and components should be placed. When the size of the
application changes, these coordinates are hard-coded, and they
will always display in the same place, which can case them to run
into components that have been resized to fit the new application
size. Now fixing those numbers is not easy. In fact, I don't know
of any way to make those numbers dynamic so they adjust when the
application size adjusts.
Instead, I suggest using constraints or Vbox/Hbox rather than
hardcoded coordinates. With constraints, you can specify how far
your Legend component is from the edges of the container it's in.
Or, you can use the VBox or HBox so your component is always in the
place it needs to be.
<mx:HBox width="80%" height="50%" top="10" left="10">
<mx:PieChart id="piechart1">
<mx:series>
<mx:PieSeries displayName="Series 1" field=""/>
</mx:series>
</mx:PieChart>
<mx:Legend dataProvider="{piechart1}"/>
</mx:HBox>
In this example, You can see I set top and left to 10. This
means that my HBox will be exactly 10 pixels from the top and left
side of my application (or container, or whatever it's confined
to). The Piechart and Legend fit neatly inside the HBox, and
because it's an HBox, they will be side by side horizontally.
If you need spacing between your chart and legend, you can
always use the Spacer control under Layout.
<mx:HBox width="80%" height="50%" top="10" left="10">
<mx:PieChart id="piechart1">
<mx:series>
<mx:PieSeries displayName="Series 1" field=""/>
</mx:series>
</mx:PieChart>
<mx:Spacer width="100%"/>
<mx:Legend dataProvider="{piechart1}"/>
</mx:HBox>
As you can see, the Spacer control is separating our chart
and the Legend by a width specified. Always use a percentage here,
as you'll run into problems I talked about in my previous post.
100% means the chart and the Legend will be as far away as they can
be while staying within the Hbox container. If you decreased it to
50%, they would only be half as far away.
Hope this helps.
EDIT:
One last example of a pie chart and a Legend within a canvas.
Each object has constraints to the canvas, which lets us put them
whereever we want within the canvas:
<mx:Canvas x="0" y="0" width="80%">
<mx:PieChart id="piechart1" left="10" top="10">
<mx:series>
<mx:PieSeries displayName="Series 1" field=""/>
</mx:series>
</mx:PieChart>
<mx:Legend dataProvider="{piechart1}" right="10"
bottom="10"/>
</mx:Canvas>
From this example, the chart will always line up to be 10
pixels from the top and left of our canvas. The Legend however,
will always line up to be 10 pixels from the right side and bottom
of our canvas. Adjusting the canvas size, the chart size, or the
legend size will give you the desired distance between these two
objects.

Bridge - How to view image in full screen resolution

In Bridge - How to view an image in full screen resolution and not as a Preview (Space bar), like in Lightroom (F), Photoshop or ViewNX 2 ?

The size of the Bridge Preview window will always be the absolute limit of the image display in Bridge. Maybe I am not following you. Sorry

DB does not look the same in different screen resolutions

Hi All -
I have built my dashboards using the Windows screen resolution 1024 x 768, and exported the dashboard into powerpoint. With this resolution the dashboard looks normal. I then changed my Windows screen resolution to 1280 x 1024, opened the ppt slideshow and my X-axis labels are being cut off. The labels are written vertically (ex: 06/09/09).
Does anyone know why this could be happening?
Thanks!
Tracy

I am experiencing the exact same thing. The width of the tabs in the layout editor is varied depending on the length of the text. However, at run-time, the width of the tabs is fixed, causing the tabs to be wider than the window and a set of VCR buttons to appear in the upper right corner of the canvas. Personally, I think this is a Forms bug. Why would they intentionally let us set the width to variable at design-time only to force a fixed width at run-time?

Unable to Change Screen Resolution in Remote Session - Windows Server 2012 R2

Does anybody know of a way to allow Remote Desktop users to adjust their own screen resolution in a remote session under Windows Server 2012 R2? We are struggling with this and can't seem to find a solution.
When users login to their RDP session and try to adjust their screen resolution this message is displayed in Control Panel:
"The display settings can't be changed from a remote session."
We don't want to use the "make text and other items larger or smaller" scaling feature, as this produces undesirable results with some of our applications. We also don't want to have to support multiple types of RDP clients or RDP shortcut
files.
We have looked at other posts but can't find an answer that applies to Windows Server 2012 R2. The closest thing we could find is KB2726399, but it only applies to Server 2008.
Does anybody have a solution for Server 2012?
Thanks

Hi,
Currently you cannot change the resolution from within the session. This is normal and expected behavior.
Unfortunately this means you need to set the desired resolution before connecting by using custom .rdp files, manually within the Remote Desktop Client, custom web launch page, custom windows launch program, etc.
-TP

Using Mini DisplayPort to VGA, screen resolution distorts. How do I fix?

When I use my Mini DisplayPort to VGA adapter, the resolution gets too big for my screen (mbpro 15") and the same thing appears on the projector I use. I'm not sure if I should change my screen resolution while I use the projector or what?
Also, the first (and only) time I used it, it seemed as if the signal wouldn't even send. After a while of fiddling around, the screen finally showed up on the projector (distorted) but we didn't do anything different to change that. It just kind of did it on it's own. Is this common for "first uses" or will this happen every time?
I plan on using this again Friday.

Welcome! If you have mini displayport, you should try the appropriate discussion group for your newer machine:
http://discussions.apple.com/category.jspa?categoryID=251
Although some things are very similar to the original Macbook Pro, many are not.

How to turn off "screen resolution" warning in iPhoto?

I am running OS X Yosemite 10.10.1 on a Mac mini (Late 2012), 2.3 GHz, 4 GB memory, iPhoto version 9.5.1 (902.17). I get the "screen resolution not optimal for iPhoto" warning repetitively about once every 15 minutes as long as iPhoto is running. I have set the resolution to my preference and I don't mind seeing this warning once when I start iPhoto, but it gets annoying. How can I set iPhoto to stop doing this?

I am running OS X Yosemite 10.10.1 on a Mac mini (Late 2012), 2.3 GHz, 4 GB memory, iPhoto version 9.5.1 (902.17). I get the "screen resolution not optimal for iPhoto" warning repetitively about once every 15 minutes as long as iPhoto is running.
Is there a reason, why you do not update to the Yosemite compatible version iPhoto 9.6? I never get the warning, you are reporting, if the iPhoto window can fit the screen, with MacOS X 10.10.2 and iPhoto 9.6.1.

How can I resize my Flash site to fit any screen resolution?

I built a 100% flash site with tiled framing but I have a
problem. My flash was built 766 x 750 pixiels. When viewed at
resolutions greater than 1024x768 the webpage looks great but
anything less than that it looks like @#$@. I know most people
probably view at 1024 x 768. Is there anyway to auto resize based
up on screen resolution or something to detect the screen size and
adjust the webpage accordingly.
www.platlimosvc.com
Below is my html (index.html) for my flash movie:
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01
Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<title>Untitled</title>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<link href="style.css" rel="stylesheet"
type="text/css">
</head>
<body>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"
style="width:100%; height:100%">
<tr>
<td valign="top" style="width:100%" height="750">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"
width="766" style="height:100% " align="center">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="234" style="height:750px ">
<object
classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swfl
ash.cab#version=6,0,29,0" width="766" height="750">
<param name="movie" value="flash/xxxx_main.swf">
<param name="quality" value="high">
<param name="menu" value="false">

<object data="flash/xxxx_main.swf"
width="766" height="750"
type="application/x-shockwave-flash">
<param name="quality" value="high">
<param name="menu" value="false">
<param name="pluginurl" value="
http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer">
FAIL (the browser should render some flash content, not
this).
</object>

</object>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" style="width:100%; height:1px;
background-color:#6C6C6C">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"
style="width:100%; height:1px">
<tr>
<td valign="top" style="width:50%;
height:1px"></td>
<td valign="top" style="width:766; height:1px">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"
width="766" style="height:1px ">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="766" style="height:1px
"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
<td valign="top" style="width:50%;
height:1px"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" style="width:100%; height:100%">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"
style="width:100%; height:100%">
<tr>
<td valign="top" style="width:50%;
background:url(images/bottom-3.gif) top right;
height:100%"></td>
<td valign="top" style="width:766;
background-image:url(images/bottom-5.gif); height:100%">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0"
width="766" style="height:100% ">
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="766" style="height:100%
"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
<td valign="top" style="width:50%;
background:url(images/bottom-4.gif) top left;
height:100%"></td>
</tr>
</table>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>

tlcarl,
> I know most people probably view at 1024 x 768.
You think so? Even if they have their resolution that high
(which is
fairly standard, nowadays), do you think most people maximize
their browsers
to fill that whole area?
> Is there anyway to auto resize based up on screen
> resolution or something to detect the screen size and
> adjust the webpage accordingly.
There is, indeed. :) Check out the Stage.onResize event in
the
ActionScript 2.0 Language Reference. That event is dispatched
when the
browser (or whatever container) is resized -- in cases where
the SWF is
embedded with percentages. If that's your aim, you'll need to
code against
that event, which can be done like this ...
http://www.quip.net/blog/2006/flash/how-to-position-movie-clips-browser-resizing
It can take a bit of thought, depending on the complexity of
your goal,
but the result is usually worth it. The site in your URL is
already built,
so this wouldn't do much of anything without opening the
hood, so to speak,
and completely rebuilding the engine. A Flash movie has to be
designed and
programmed to respond to the Stage.onResize event.
David Stiller
Adobe Community Expert
Dev blog,
http://www.quip.net/blog/
"Luck is the residue of good design."

Itunes 11 keeps changing my screen resolution

I too am an itunes 11 sufferer! Everytime I run it, it alters my screen resolution - I'd happily upgrade to the older, better, bug-free version that I was running before,but am afraid i might lose my library of music.
In trying to find a solution online i can't believe the number of issues with Itunes 11 that have cropped up. Does Apple really despise its customers so much and hold them in such low regard that they could bring out such a flawed piece of software?
Does anyone have a solution to having to reset the screen resolution everytime I use iTunes?
Thanks,

Caleb.online wrote:
There isn't a way to increase the width of the iTunes window
You can resize any window by grabbing (click-hold) the three little lines in the bottom right corner and move it up or down, right or left.
Is this what you mean?
BTW... the resolution of 1280 x 800 is what you would normally set your screen to.

EHP1 Upgarde Monitor screen resolution problem in a support message

Hi Experts,
We have recently upgraded our Solution manager to EHP1, iam facing a screen resolution problem with 15 inch monitors.
Our key users have 15 inch monitors to their system and when they try to reply a support message under transaction data-> Overview tab -> reply it is showing only one line for them , due to which they are unable to enter the complete data in it.
How ever We have found that this does not occur with 17 inc monitors as the required screen resoution 1280* 1024 is possible due to bigger size of the monitor.
can any one suggest how to make the overview tab visible completely with small resolution monitors.
Thanks
Nanda

>
Nanda Kishore wrote:
> Hi
>
> There is an note from sap on this issue i couldnt remember the note number which talks about updating your package levell
>
> Kindly check this note it was released in SEP 09 a very recent one. this will resolve your probelm.
SAP Note 1351673 Size of containers not changed for support messages
Best regards,
Ruediger

Screen Resolution trouble on Toshiba Satellite l775-s7307after reinstallation of Windows 7

I was having troubles. Had browser malware that couldn't be contained, and I had other issues, such as, getting the blue screen of death on a regular basis.....I wiped the HD, and reinstalled Windows 7-32 bit, and downloaded and installed all the drivers for this model from the Toshiba website, but I seem to be struggling with readjusting my screen resolution to where it should be....It won't set any higher than 1024 x 768.
Any ideas?

In the future, I'd recommend performing a system recovery rather than reinstalling a clean copy of Windows. A system recovery will include all applicable software.
You installed the latest Intel display driver?
Intel Display Driver(v8.15.10.2509; 10-11-2011; 86.48M)
- Peter

Xorg 1.6, nvidia and screen resolutions

I just upgraded to xorg 1.6 from testing, including the nvidia drivers and kernel from testing. Everything is working great (and it fixed the libxi keyboard layout problems I was having), except that I can no longer select the screen resolution I want from the nvidia-settings application. The set of resolutions is very limited and I'm getting a horizontal stretch due to an incorrect aspect ratio.
I've tried manually adjusting the xorg.conf file after saving it in nvidia-settings, but it makes a mess of the file and I couldn't get it working. Does anybody know how to add screen resolutions into the nvidia-settings application?
Thank you!
Darin

Happened to me with most recent 1.5 update, I downgraded back to previous one to get working again. And now same happened with 1.6, this time I downgrade again without any further testing until someone else gets it solved

[SOLVED] Updating Xorg screwed up my screen-resolution.

After doing pacman -Syu earlier this evening, my screen-resolution was screwed up. One of the packages that was updated by pacman -Syu was X to 1.7.1-1 and all of its depencies.
I downgraded xorg (and its dependencies) to 1.6.3.901-1 and after that everything is working fine again.
I'm trying to figure out why the update failed, but to be honest I don't know where to look for clues. The only thing I can come up with is that maybe it would be better to update X without X running.
Before I try this solution I need some feedback on this. So if you could please give your comments/advise towards the following issues:
1. Is it better to update X without X running?
2. Where would I have to look for clues to find out why the update of X failed?
Thxs.
Last edited by NeoXP (2009-11-01 21:39:13)

NeoXP wrote:
After doing pacman -Syu earlier this evening, my screen-resolution was screwed up. One of the packages that was updated by pacman -Syu was X to 1.7.1-1 and all of its depencies.
I downgraded xorg (and its dependencies) to 1.6.3.901-1 and after that everything is working fine again.
I'm trying to figure out why the update failed, but to be honest I don't know where to look for clues. The only thing I can come up with is that maybe it would be better to update X without X running.
Before I try this solution I need some feedback on this. So if you could please give your comments/advise towards the following issues:
1. Is it better to update X without X running?
2. Where would I have to look for clues to find out why the update of X failed?
Thxs.
I have a similiar problem except that my X hang the whole computer. I have an Intel card and maybe thats the reason for the hang. To answer 1., I did my upgrade without X running, so that doesn't prevent bad things from happening. I downgraded to the previous version, as you did, and now everything is working again.
With respect to 2., I looked into Xorg log and found nothing relevant to this problem.

Windows XP Pro Desktop - Screen Resolution and Color Quality

When synchronizing my Zire after many successful and no problems the XP Pro screen resolution reverted to the lowest profile.
I can reset the resolution to the True color 1024 x 768 but after a minute or two it reverts again.
1. Reinstalled driver for Intel video on Compaq D510C motherboard and get same problems as well as corrupted looking graphics on screen.
2. Switched to a known good monitor and same problems (which I did not think was the problem but did to verify).
3. Installed new gForce5200fx graphics card and video still reverts and is corrupted looking even when in higher reset resolution.
4. Created new user to see if user profile was corrupted and still reverts and is corrupted looking even when in higher reset resolution.
Any suggestions?????

I also flashed the bios

DataGrid broken by screen resolution?!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for