DataGrid Sorting Issues

Dear Good Sirs,
I have encountered a problem with an app of mine where i have a datagrid that i refresh every 30 seconds.  However on the refresh of the dataset i will loose the sorting that i have on my datagrid.  I have trailed the net for various work arounds but so far have been unsuccessful and would appreciate some advice as to how i might be able to get around this issue.  I take the data from a source url to provide and xml list.  Sample below.
//where the data is coming from
mx:HTTPService id="httpGetOffers" url="testURL" method="GET"
resultFormat="e4x" result="doxmltestlist(event)" fault="fault(event)" useProxy="false" />
//my xmllist
[Bindable] private var xmltestlist:XMLList;
/result set
private function doxmltestlist(evt:ResultEvent):void
xmltestlist = evt.result.r;
//my grid
<mx:Panel title="Offer Bonds Only">
<renders:CitiDataGrid id="dgtestsort" dataProvider="{xmltestlist}" rowCount="20" variableRowHeight="true"totalRowColor="0xCCCCCC" >
<renders:columns>
<mx:DataGridColumn dataField="1" headerText="test1 sortCompareFunction="{numericSortByField('x')}"/>
<mx:DataGridColumn dataField="2" headerText="test2" sortCompareFunction="{numericSortByField('autonegtotaloffers')}"/>
<mx:DataGridColumn dataField="3" headerText="test3"  sortCompareFunction="{numericSortByField('done')}"/>
</renders:CitiDataGrid> 
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Patrick

If you are resetting the dataprovider, you will have to save and re-apply
the sort.  If the data items really aren't changing, it might be better to
find a way to update the current dataProvider.

Similar Messages

  • Datagrid sorting issues with 1/0 items to consider

    Hi all,
    I have an issue I can't find a way to fix. I am using a datagrid which I pouplate through a XMListCollection based on some XML datas.
    XML:
    var prefs:XML = <files>
    <file name="@toto" favourite="1"/>
    <file name="@toto"favourite="0"/>
    </files>;
    XMLListCollection
    var xlc:XMLListCollection = new XMLListCollection( new XMLList ( prefs.file) );
    MXML
    <mx:DataGrid id="filesList" width="100%" height="100%" dataProvider="{xlc}">
    <mx:columns>
    <mx:DataGridColumn width="25" dataField="@favourite"sortCompareFunction="favourite_sortCompareFunc"/>
    </mx:columns>
    </mx:DataGrid>
    Sorting fucnction:
    private function favourite_sortCompareFunc(itemA:Object, itemB:Object):int {
        var value1:Number = Number( itemA.@favourite );
        var value2:Number = Number( itemB.@favourite );
        if(value1 < value2){
             var n:Number = -1;
             return n;
        else if(value1 > value2){
             return 1;
        else{
             return 0;
        return 1;
    Once loaded, the datagrid appears in a "normal state":
    But if I try to sort first column, it becomes messy
    I think it might be related to the fact that the data to be sorted is only made of 0 & 1. But I can't imagine this kind of situations is not fixable.
    Any hint ?
    Thanks in advance for any advice,
    Loic

    Hi guys,
    First of all, all my apologizes for my silence. I had technical issues with Yahoo mail that made me miss 3 months mail ! So I just missed your posts and I can only come today to thank you all for your care and answers.
    In the meanwhile, I finally got it working by doing…nothing. Let me explain. The issue was caused by equal datas ( 1 or 0 ). So Flex couldn't sort 1 and 1 or 0 and 0 by itself. But these 0 and 1 were flags for an itemrenderer made of a button in toggle mode. 1 standed for on, 0 for off.
    Doing so I did override updateDisplayList and then the issue went away. But if I had to stick with pure datas ( 1 or 0 ) I think I would have had to do a custom sort function to deal with equal datas like a few of you offered.
    @DonMitchinson the @ stands for the xml attribute as the datagrid is populated with XMLListCollection from an XML file.
    Thanks for your sharing,
    Best,
    Loic

  • DataGrid Sorting Issue with Hotfix2

    I already opened a ticket with Adobe on this, but since this
    is a critical issue for us I wanted to post a message to see if
    anyone has any idea where the issue in flex sdk lies.
    Check tab 2 of the sample app, Sorting a datagrid who's
    column only has partial data causes an error, works fine on Hotfix
    1 (same test)
    Sample App:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <mx:Application xmlns:mx="
    http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml"
    layout="absolute" creationComplete="creationComplete()">
    <mx:Script>
    <![CDATA[
    import mx.collections.ArrayCollection;
    import mx.utils.ObjectProxy;
    [Bindable]
    public var dgData:ArrayCollection = new ArrayCollection();
    public function creationComplete():void
    var object:ObjectProxy;
    object = new ObjectProxy();
    object["filled"] = "Filled A";
    object["partial"] = "Partial A";
    dgData.addItem(object);
    object = new ObjectProxy();
    object["filled"] = "Filled B";
    object["partial"] = "Partial B";
    dgData.addItem(object);
    object = new ObjectProxy();
    object["filled"] = "Filled C";
    dgData.addItem(object);
    object = new ObjectProxy();
    object["filled"] = "Filled D";
    dgData.addItem(object);
    ]]>
    </mx:Script>
    <mx:XMLList id="treeData">
    <node label="Mail Box">
    <node label="Inbox">
    <node label="Marketing"/>
    <node label="Product Management">
    <node label="Large node Large Node Large Node Large
    Node"/>
    </node>
    <node label="Personal"/>
    </node>
    <node label="Outbox">
    <node label="Professional"/>
    <node label="Personal"/>
    </node>
    <node label="Spam"/>
    <node label="Sent"/>
    <node label="Spam2"/>
    <node label="Sent2"/>
    <node label="Spam3"/>
    <node label="Sent3"/>
    <node label="Spam4"/>
    <node label="Sent4"/>
    <node label="Spam5"/>
    <node label="Sent5"/>
    <node label="Spam6"/>
    <node label="Sent6"/>
    </node>
    </mx:XMLList>
    <mx:TabNavigator height="100%" width="1005">
    <mx:Canvas label="Tree Issue">
    <mx:Text x="284" y="51" fontSize="16" fontWeight="bold"
    text="Issue: Expand the tree node to open up Product Management
    node, no Horizontal Scroll bar appears." width="390"/>
    <mx:Canvas verticalScrollPolicy="auto"
    horizontalScrollPolicy="auto">
    <mx:Tree x="50" y="50" width="226" height="303"
    dataProvider="{treeData}" labelField="@label"
    verticalScrollPolicy="auto" horizontalScrollPolicy="auto"/>
    </mx:Canvas>
    </mx:Canvas>
    <mx:Canvas label="DataGrid Issue">
    <mx:DataGrid id="dgTest" dataProvider="{dgData}"
    width="500" height="300" x="10" y="10">
    <mx:columns>
    <mx:DataGridColumn headerText="Filled Row"
    dataField="filled"/>
    <mx:DataGridColumn headerText="Partially Filled Row"
    dataField="partial"/>
    </mx:columns>
    </mx:DataGrid>
    <mx:Text x="10" y="318" fontSize="16" fontWeight="bold"
    text="Issue: Toggle the sort in the column that has only partial
    data. You will get a find criteria error. This worked in Hotfix 2
    and was broke in Hotfix 2." width="390"/>
    </mx:Canvas>
    </mx:TabNavigator>
    </mx:Application>

    Hi,
    With new hotfixes some bugs ( most of bugs) in Flex SDK are
    get fixed, but rarely new (sometimes critical) bugs can appear.
    Before Flex 3 release which will allow on IDE level to switch
    between different versions of Flex SDK on the fly, I would advice
    you to store locallly copy of all versions of Flex 2 SDK released
    to the public. Then, in case if you will encounter a serious bug in
    the most recent release of Flex 2 SDK, you can fix it by yourlself
    by reusing the old code from former release of Flex 2 SDK.
    See what I did with found bug in Flex 2.0.1 release, which is
    what not present in Flex 2.0 SDK release:
    jabbypanda.com/blog/?p=25

  • Datagrid sorting issue

    I have two datagrids. After a form is submitted, datagrid 1
    is populated. Clicking on any of the rows will submit to another
    query and populate datagrid 2.
    If I have submitted my form and datagrid 1 is populated, and
    I sort the columns, it will sort and kick of the second query.
    Instead of sending to the HTTP service directly when clicking
    on datagrid 1 header or row, I have it going to a routine. If the
    user has not selected a row, and clicks a column, it will sort but
    not submit.
    However, that only gets me half the way there. If a user
    selected a row in datagrid 1, and then sorts, it will still submit
    to datagrid 2. Again, I don't see why if I'm clearly clicking on
    the column header to sort that it should submit also.
    Is there a way to make the column header independent of the
    rows?

    I would not have expected that.
    Pass "event" into the itemClick handler.
    Use it to determine what was clicked, and do not make your
    data service call if it is the header row. Not exactly how to
    determine that, you will need to look at the contents of that
    event. Maybe rowIndex = -1?
    Tracy

  • [svn:fx-4.x] 14289: Fix DataGrid mirroring issues when layoutDirection="rtl " and direction="rtl":

    Revision: 14289
    Revision: 14289
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-02-19 13:08:54 -0800 (Fri, 19 Feb 2010)
    Log Message:
    Fix DataGrid mirroring issues when layoutDirection="rtl" and direction="rtl":
    - headers get messed up when resizing, moving or sorting a column because the transform matrix in UIFTETextField wasn?\226?\128?\153t always updated when width was changed
    - when moving a column, the headerSelection sprite was moving in the wrong direction
    - when dragging a row, the drag image was backwards and the x offset between the image and the mouse pointer was wrong
    QE notes:
    Doc notes: None
    Bugs: SDK-25424, SDK-25426, SDK-25440, SDK-25442, SDK-25452, SDK-25460, SDK-25462, SDK-25464
    Reviewed By: Hans
    Tests run: checkintests
    Is noteworthy for integration: No
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25424
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25426
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25440
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25442
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25452
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25460
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25462
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25464
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/branches/4.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/DataGrid.as
        flex/sdk/branches/4.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/dataGridClasses/DataG ridDragProxy.as
        flex/sdk/branches/4.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/dataGridClasses/DataG ridHeader.as
        flex/sdk/branches/4.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UITextField.as
        flex/sdk/branches/4.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/managers/DragManagerImpl.as
        flex/sdk/branches/4.x/frameworks/projects/spark/src/mx/core/UIFTETextField.as

    Dear Pallavi,
    Very useful post!
    I am looking for similar accelerators for
    Software Inventory Accelerator
    Hardware Inventory Accelerator
    Interfaces Inventory
    Customization Assessment Accelerator
    Sizing Tool
    Which helps us to come up with the relevant Bill of Matetials for every area mentioned above, and the ones which I dont know...
    Request help on such accelerators... Any clues?
    Any reply, help is highly appreciated.
    Regards
    Manish Madhav

  • Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

    Dear all,
    It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
    In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
    After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
    Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    M.T.

    903714 wrote:
    Dear all,
    It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
    In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
    After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
    Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
    So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
    To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
    alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
    Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

  • Query as a web service Sorting issue

    Hi All,
    We have designed an existing BI query as a web service but it seems to be ignoring the Sort order of different characteristics used (as defined in Bex Query Designer).
    Using the Context menu in QAAS and defining/managing the Sort is not working.
    Has anyone experienced such an issue and how to handle this?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Bansi

    Hi All,
    You can try this solution. It has something to do with the universe parameter, END_SQL.
    I implemented this as a work around and it solved our problem about the sorting issue with QAAWS.
    Here are the steps:
    1: Open the universe
    2. Ope File,  then Universe Parameter
    3. Click the parameter tab
    4. Scroll down until you see the 'END_SQL' entry. This entry is blank by default.
    5. Select END_SQL
    6. On the VALUE box, type: ORDER BY 1
    7. This will enable the REPLACE button. Click REPLACE
    8. Save the universe
    9 Test a query using 2 columns and view the SQL.
    You should see now the ORDER BY 1 inferred in the SQL statement.
    Voila!!!!
    Of course you can always add ORDER By 1,2,3 later if there's a need.
    Enjoy.....
    Ferdinand

  • Finder sort issue

    I seem to be having a sorting issue.
    This order seems odd to me, but like to get your opinions about it.
    (This folder is sorted alphabetically by file name.)
    2008 01.doc
    2008 02.doc
    Activiteit_oktober.doc
    af 200802 - groen reserve.rtf
    af 200802 - groen.rtf
    af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc
    af 20080126 - groen.rtf
    af 20080216 avond - leiding WE.pages
    af 20080704 avond - groen & oranje.pages
    af 20080709 avond - bezinning.rtf
    idee spel.rtf
    In my logic the file 'af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc' should be before the two files beginning with 'af 200802' and not after. Or is this just me?

    In my logic the file 'af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc' should be before the two files beginning with 'af 200802' and not after. Or is this just me?
    OS X Finder sorts strings of digits according to their value, not digit by digit. 200802 is less than 20071130. Here is a note on the issue:
    http://homepage.mac.com/thgewecke/sorting.html

  • DataGrid sort start/completion:  specific associated events?

    Hi all,
    A lot of my DataGrid sorts take a non-trivial amount of time.
    So, I'd like to show a busy cursor while the operation runs. In
    order to do this I'd need events associated with the start and
    completion of the operation. Are there such events available?
    Thanks!
    -Noah

    This thread was "imported" from the old forums -- most, if not all, code seems to have disappeared. But here are the sort functions I posted:
    function sortXML(source:XML, elementName:Object, fieldName:Object,
    options:Object = null):XML
         // list of elements we're going to sort
         var list:XMLList=source.elements("*").(name()==elementName);
         // list of elements not included in the sort -
         // we place these back into the source node at the end
         var excludeList:XMLList=source.elements("*").(name()!=elementName);
         list= sortXMLList(list,fieldName,options);
         list += excludeList;
         source.setChildren(list);
         return source;
    function sortXMLList(list:XMLList, fieldName:Object, options:Object =
    null):XMLList
         var arr:Array = new Array();
         var ch:XML;
         for each(ch in list)
               arr.push(ch);
         var resultArr:Array = fieldName==null ?
               options==null ? arr.sort() :arr.sort(options)
               : arr.sortOn(fieldName, options);
         var result:XMLList = new XMLList();
         for(var i:int=0; i<resultArr.length; i++)
               result += resultArr[i];
         return result;

  • Front Row sorting issues

    Hello,
    I know this issue has been posted several times and without any real solutions. But I'm going to ask again anyway in case the magical hacking gnomes have found a work-around.
    I have many sorting issues. There seems to be a lot of kvetching on here already about how Front Row sorts TV shows. But not only do my shows come up backwards within seasons, in some cases seasons themselves are out of order. For example, I have all 3 seasons of 30 Rock (purchased through iTMS) and they go season 1, season 3, season 2. Several other shows with multiple seasons are the same.
    But I also have a music sorting issue. The first part of this issue has to do with compilations. I've got several compilations in my library, and in iTunes I've sorted them by Various Artists rather than individual artists. In Front Row, if I scroll down to "V," there is no "Various Artists" like you might expect but instead a list of all the artists in all the compilations completely out of order. (Actually, they're ordered by their track number on the different albums. Yeah. That makes sense.) I could deal with these artists showing up in their normal places alphabetically, but not all lumped together under V.
    The other issue has to do with albums with one artist who has some tracks that feature other artists. Kanye West's "Graduation" is a good example. About half the tracks on the album are him "featuring Jamie Foxx," for example. So I put "Kanye West" in the sort field of this album so it displays properly in iTunes. Not only does this seem to have no effect on how things are sorted in Front Row, but there's actually multiple "Kanye West"s now, each one identical, as well as multiple "Kanye West feat. Jamie Foxx," lines and all the other multiple artist track. Uh...what?
    So I know that Front Row for some ridiculous reason is (a) not customizable and (b) operates under completely different sorting rules than iTunes (which makes no sense), but if anyone has any advice or tips or comments or whatever, that would be greatly appreciated.
    I've considered switching to a different media management program, but what I like about Front Row is its simplicity. I don't really feel like learning a whole new system (let alone getting my wife to buy into that idea). I've got better ways to spend my time. So, it's a trade off, I guess.
    Anyway, Apple Gods? Are you out there? Are you listening?

    I can't believe we're still banging on about the sorting problems. Apple have seen fit to provide a number of features to allow the user to get iTunes working the way they like, e.g. grouping compilation artists and the use of sort fields. I think you can now even keep compilation artists grouped on the iPod. But why oh why do they then totally ignore this for the AppleTV and Front Row (which look like the same codebase to me)?
    I have hundreds of genuine Artists that I want to see listed in the Artists' list, but not the thousands of others that appear on compilations. They don't even sort the artists by the Artist Sort field that they themselves provide in iTunes. This makes a nonsense of trying to use either the ATV or Front Row.
    Playlists are no help as they simply lump all contained tracks in one great list. Useless.
    The annoying thing is, they can get it right. iTunes just gets better and better in this regard, each release sorting out more of the omissions of earlier versions. But ATV and Front Row - nope, nothing. Still just as stupid as always. Just what will it take to convince Apple to 'sort' (ha) this out? How can they justify such entirely different ways of working on their different products?

  • Cover flow and album sort issues

    I just got a 80GB iPod classic for Christmas and I have noticed some annoying differences between iTunes cover flow and iPod cover flow:
    1. In iTunes cover flow, when you have songs with "Unknown Album", they clutter up the cover flow for each artist. In iPod cover flow, they are sent to the back of the cover flow in a nice little "Various Artists" cover. I like how this works on the iPod better.
    2. iTunes cover flow sorts by album artist, so you don't see a separate album for each non-album artist song.
    For example: If I set my album artist for the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack to "Saturday Night Fever" (don't ask why, this is how i like it sorted) then I will only see one "Saturday Night Fever" rather than one for Bee Gees, one for Kool & the Gang, etc.
    iPod cover flow sorts by artist, so you see a separate album for each non-album artist song. I like the way this works in iTunes better.
    3. When sorting by "Album by Year" in iTunes, syncing the iPod doesn't seem to follow the same sorting. Albums are still sorted on the iPod alphabetically. I want them to sort by year on my iPod.
    So I would appreciate it if someone could help me with all 3 of these issues. As you can see, sometimes iTunes is better for me, sometimes iPod is better for me.

    3. Playlists should be sorted in the same way as they are in iTunes. The Cover Flow order is fixed.
    This is not the case, at least not with iTunes 7.5.0.20 and my 80GB Classic running 1.0.3 on it (current version as of this writing). In iTunes, under LIBRARY, I select Music, and I have my music sorted via *Album by Year*. This works perfectly in iTunes. I'll use my Soundgarden library as an example, as it shows the problem nicely.
    *_iTunes order_:*
    Ultramega OK
    Louder Than Love
    Screaming Life/Fopp
    Badmotorfinger
    Superunknown
    Songs From The Superunknown
    Down on the Upside
    A-Sides
    That's ordered by date and is perfect. +Ultramega OK+ was released way back in 1988, while A-Sides was released nearly 10 years later in 1997. In Cover Flow View it works great. However, in the iPod it's sorted alphabetically, which is completely wrong:
    *_iPod Classic_:*
    A-Sides
    Badmotorfinger
    Down on the Upside
    Louder Than Love
    Screaming Life/Fopp
    Songs From The Superunknown
    Superunknown
    Ultramega OK
    This is totally wrong. And I haven't yet found a way to force it.
    Apple, please, this shouldn't be that difficult.

  • Payment Advice Sort Issue

    Hi All,
      We are having an issue with the way the payment advices are sorted for our canadian company when running DME. We set a sort variant based on Payee name on REGUH which is ZNME1, but that field has <b>Firstname Lastname</b> so all the sort is done based on first name. We want to do it based on last name but there no field on REGUH which will help us.
    Kindly advice.
    Regards,
    S

    Hi Javed
    Please let me know if you have implemented any solution to this. We are facing the same issue.
    Regards
    Rajesh

  • Index (HHK) sorting issue in Japanese (RoboHelp X3)

    I'm a Japanese localizing engineer who now tries to generate
    a WebHelp with a nicely sorted index in Japanese.
    As I assume that this has been a known issue for double-byte
    languages for a long time, a Japanese index cannot be sorted
    perfectly in a compiled chm or WebHelp. In Japanese, there are
    several types of Japanese characters (Kanji, Katakana, Hiragana).
    Regardless of what type of character a string is typed in, Japanese
    strings should be sorted according to <i>yomi-gana</i>,
    the way each Japanese string pronounces but currently an index gets
    sorted according to the following order (in ASCII code):
    *number
    *alphabet
    *hiragana
    *katanaka
    *kanji... and so on.
    So here I'm trying to do the followings:
    1. In a HHK file, I put <so>...</so> in front of
    every entry where I spell out the pronounciation in each <so>
    segment.
    2. Open the HHK with HTML Workshop, sort the file, and save
    it (I'll get the file sorted according to what I have put in
    <so>..</so>.
    3. Open it with a Text Editor and remove all the
    <so>..</so> entrires.
    4. Put the HHK file in a build folder and generate a
    chm/WebHelp in RoboHelp X3.
    In the 4th step, I don't want RoboHelp to re-sort the HHK but
    it does it automatically. If I can disable the index sorting
    functionality in RoboHelp X3 (the latest version in Japanese) but
    looks like there is no way to do it. If anyone is sure that it's
    not possible to disable the auto-sorting functionality in RoboHelp,
    please let me know so that I can give up witout a sweat.
    By the way, I have tried the alternative for WebHelp that
    skips the 3rd step and removes all the <so>...</so> in
    the files that RoboHelp creates. The result is that everything got
    messed up and some of the contents in the Index couldn't be viewed
    in a browser.
    Thanks.
    Rota.

    Hi Paul
    Have you tried just right-clicking in the index and choosing sort?
    Click the image below to view larger.
    Note that this may require you to temporarily configure Microsoft HTML Help as the primary layout and editing the Project Settings in order to allow the sort function to appear.
    Remember, you press Ctrl+Shift+? to open Project Settings. You then would turn off (or ensure it's turned off) the Binary Index feature.
    Once you have done this, you would then revert any settings that you changed to allow things to work.
    Cheers... Rick
    Helpful and Handy Links
    RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
    Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
    Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
    SorcerStone Blog
    RoboHelp eBooks

  • Possible resolution to sorting issue in iTunes 9 and 3.1

    For those experiencing issues sorting Podcasts chronologically:
    One particular daily podcast I subscribe to was not sorting correctly (was in random order on the iPod Touch 32gb 2nd Gen).
    I did notice the "Release Date" wasn't carrying over to the iPod during the syncing process.
    (If you try this, copy any podcasts you can't afford to lose to a separate directory)
    1) I unsubscribed from the podcast in iTunes 9
    2) deleted all the episodes from iTunes
    3) Synced iTunes / iPod - (basically removing remnants of the podcast)
    4) Went back to the iTunes store and subscribed again to said podcast
    5) "Get" the episodes I wanted
    6) Synced iTunes and iTouch
    Thankfully, this corrected the issue of random sort order on my iPod - now the "Release Date" is again noted / visible when looking in the iPod and it is ordered correctly.
    Hope this provides some relief to some.

    I had this happen with my 3GS almost a month ago. No amount of trying to restore would work and the Apple Genius claimed he had never seen anything like it.
    My iPhone was bricked with the error 23. I plugged it into XCode and it failed to restore saying there was a radio failure. There was no 3G, no WiFi no edge and no bluetooth. They were all grayed out in settings. Apple replaced my phone with no problem. This is what you will end up having to do as well.
    You will be able to restore from your previous backup.

  • Mobile Me gallery sorting issue

    I recently upgraded iLife from '08 to '09. I am having an issue when I publish and event to my Mobile Me Gallery where its not sorting the photos correctly in the gallery. They don't seem to sorted the same way as I have them in the event when I publish them to the mobile me gallery, its not doing it every time just sometimes. I know I can go into the published gallery within iPhoto and go to view > sort and change it in there but it seems strange that I would have to do that. Why wouldn't it publish the same way as I have them sorted in the event. It also seems that sometimes when I do resort them in the gallery that it doesn't stay. Also is there a way to set the default setting to sort a certain way? Thanks.
    Message was edited by: johncocci

    I am having similar problems, also in reordering multiple galleries in iPhoto.
    try leaving feedback for Apple at http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphoto.html to make them aware of the issues. Maybe they will fix this in a future update. it did work in iPhoto '08 after all.

Maybe you are looking for