Datatypes : Raw, Long , Long Raw

Hi
What is the difference between datatypes : RAW,long RAW,
Long.
Could you give some examples too.
Thanks
R.

I know that someone will come along and correct this. The LONG is structured and can be used to save text entered by a person in a text field. The LONG RAW is unstructed and generally hold binary data such as images, documents, video and sound. The max length in the area of 2G.

Similar Messages

  • LOB, LONG, LONG RAW 데이터 타입 간의 비교

    제품 : ORACLE SERVER
    작성날짜 : 2002-11-19
    LOB, LONG, LONG RAW 데이터 타입 간의 비교
    =========================================
    PURPOSE
    이 문서는 LOB 데이터 타입과 LONG이나 LONG Raw 데이터 타입의 차이점 및
    LOB 사용에 따라 발생하는 제약 사항을 기술하는 데 목적이 있다.
    Explanation
    LOB (Large Object)는 LONG이나, LONG RAW 데이터 타입과 유사하지만, 일부 차이점이 존재한다.
    1. 테이블의 한 ROW에 여러 LOB 컬럼이 있을 수 있는 반면, LONG 또는 LONG RAW 컬럼은
    한 ROW에 하나 밖에 사용될 수 없다.
    2. LOB는 사용자 정의 데이터 타입 (user-defined datatype)의
    속성 (attribute) 으로 사용될 수 있는 반면, LONG이나 LONG RAW는 속성으로
    사용될 수 없다.
    3. LONG 또는 LONG RAW는 값 전체가 테이블 내에 저장이 되는 반면, LOB는 테이블 컬럼
    내에 LOB locator만 저장이된다. BLOB과 CLOB (내부 LOB) 데이터는 별도의 테이블스페이스에
    저장시킬 수 있으며, BFILE (외부 LOB) 데이터는 데이터베이스 외부의 별도 파일로 존재한다.
    따라서 LOB 컬럼을 액세스할 경우에는, locator 값만 return되는 반면, LONG이나
    LONG RAW 컬럼을 액세스할 경우에는, 전체 값이 return된다.
    4. LOB 데이터는 4GB까지 저장이 가능하며, BFILE 컬럼이 가리키는 파일 크기는 4GB 이내에서
    OS에서 지원하는 최대 크기까지 가능하다. 액세스 가능한 범위는 1부터 (232-1) 까지이다.
    한편 LONG이나 LONG RAW 데이터 타입에서는 2GB 까지만 지원이 가능하다.
    5. 데이터에 대한 랜덤 액세스 기능 또는 데이터 조작을 할 경우 LOB를 사용하는 것이
    LONG 또는 LONG RAW를 사용하는 것에 비해 훨씬 많은 기능을 사용할 수 있다.
    6. LOB는 랜덤 액세스가 가능한 반면, LONG 타입에 저장된 데이터는 처음부터 원하는
    지점까지 순차적으로 읽어 처리하여야 한다.
    7. LOB 데이터에 대한 replication을 local 또는 remote에서 수행할 수 있는 반면,
    LONG / LONG RAW 컬럼 데이터는 replication이 되지 않는다.
    8. LONG 컬럼의 데이터는 TO_LOB()라는 함수를 사용하여 LOB로 변환 가능하지만,
    LOB를 LONG / LONG RAW로 변환 하는 기능은 제공되지 않는다.
    한편, LOB 사용을 하는데 다음과 같은 제약 사항이 따른다.
    1. LOB는 클러스터 테이블에서는 사용할 수 없으며, 따라서 클러스터 키
    로도 사용할 수 없다.
    2. LOB 컬럼은 GROUP BY, ORDER BY, SELECT DISTINCT 등에 사용할 수 없으며
    JOIN 에도 사용할 수 없다. 그러나 LOB 컬럼을 사용하는 테이블에 대한
    UNION ALL은 지원이 된다. UNION MINUS나 SELECT DISTINCT는 OBJECT TYPE의
    MAP이나 ORDER 함수가 정의된 경우 사용할 수 있다.
    3. LOB 컬럼은 ANALYZE ... COMPUTE/ESTIMATE STATISTICS 명령 사용 시에도
    analyze 되지 않는다.
    4. LOB는 파티션된 IOT (Index Organized Table)에는 사용할 수 없다. 그러나
    파티션 되어 있지 않은 IOT에는 사용할 수 있다.
    5. LOB는 VARRAY에는 사용할 수 없다.
    6. NCLOB은 OBJECT TYPE의 속성(attribute)으로 사용될 수 없으나, 메소드 정의를
    하는 데는 NCLOB 파라미터를 사용할 수 있다.
    Example
    none
    Reference Documents
    Oracle8i Application Developer's Guide
    Note:107441.1

  • I can no longer import raw files from my Panasonic Lumix LX5 into Aperture 3.3.2 - raw files from my other Canon cameras are fine. Am still running Lion - NOT Mountain Lion. Tried all available software updates - no joy. Any ideas please?

    I can no longer import raw files from my Panasonic Lumix LX5 into Aperture 3.3.2 - raw files from my other Canon cameras are fine. Am still running Lion (10.7.4) - NOT Mountain Lion. Tried all available software updates - all up to date apparently but still no joy. OS X Lion shows the LX5 as a supported file format. I dont want to have to upgrade to Mountain Lion just to see if this solves the problem. Any ideas please.

    Since when did this happen? Directly after you upgraded to Aperture 3.3.2?
    If it happened directly after the upgrade the problem may be, that the raw support for your camera got lost. For some posters it helped to register the raw support again, see this post by Alan Roseman:
    Aperture 3 preview of raw file greenish
    If this does not help, you may need to reinstall Lion to bring back the raw support.
    But if the problem occured independent of a new installation, ypu may have a problem with your camera or the card you are using. Have you tried to use a different card or to reformat the card in the camera?

  • Finder can no longer preview RAW (.arw) files

    Hi everyone,
    Since the Digital Camera Raw Compatibility Update 2.7, Finder will no longer preview RAW (.arw) files. This issue also affects Preview & iPhoto.
    I've tried re-installing the update but the installer errors and then quits.
    I've noticed that the /System/Library/CoreServices/RawCamera.bundle/ folder is missing since the update.
    Any recommendations on how to resolve this small problem?
    Justin

    Did Apple re-release the Digital Camera Raw Compatibility Update 2.7? It appeared again within Software Update. After installing it, Raw files are recognised correctly now.

  • Hi, I have a version of CS4 on my Mac.  I can not longer open Raw files with it from my Canon 5D.   I never had problems with it in the past.  What can I do?

    Hi, I have a version of CS4 on my Mac.  I can not longer open Raw files with it from my Canon 5D.   I never had problems with it in the past.  What can I do?

    is that the eos 5d?
    if so, you only need cr 3.3 or greater.  what version do you have in your cs4? (help>about plugins>camera raw)
    if you need to update it, http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/

  • Caching RAW and LONG RAW objects

    Hi,
    Is there any way to cache RAW and LONG RAW object like BLOB caching?
    Thanks

    Is there any way to cache RAW and LONG RAW object like BLOB caching?What is the version?
    to fetch long fetch size character of bytes you must use any one of below three.
    1)Primary key
    2)ROWID
    3)Unique columns

  • Why so long for raw suppert  updates for new cameras

    why so long for raw support  updates for new cameras

    Only Apple management can answer that and they don't give out that type of information.
    If there is  a specific camera you would like supported send feedback to Apple. See Aperture->Provide Aperture Feedback

  • Signature: FSUpdateOperationStatus(void const*, TCountedPtr TCFURLInfo const&, long long, long long, long long, long long, unsigned long). No support Docs on file for this problem. Multiple crashes on opening Firefax. Running OSX 10.6.4.

    Signature:
    FSUpdateOperationStatus(void const*, TCountedPtr<TCFURLInfo> const&, long long, long long, long long, long long, unsigned long)
    No Support Docs on File.
    Firefox crashes every time it is opened.
    UUID 38fc1438-492f-4ce3-91d4-5ef922101027
    Time 2010-10-27 11:19:32.620395
    Uptime 11
    Last Crash 110 seconds before submission
    Install Age 610295 seconds (1.0 weeks) since version was first installed.
    Product Firefox
    Version 3.6.11
    Build ID 20101012104758
    Branch 1.9.2
    OS Mac OS X
    OS Version 10.6.4 10F569
    CPU x86
    CPU Info GenuineIntel family 6 model 15 stepping 11
    Crash Reason EXC_BAD_ACCESS / KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE
    Crash Address 0x8
    User Comments
    Processor Notes
    EMCheckCompatibility Fal

    Looking at the crash log it looks like AE might be crashing in:
    net.telestream.wmv.export 
    Can you try uinstalling Flip4Mac (or whatever you have installed from http://www.telestream.net/telestream-products/desktop-products.htm)? You may need to manually go deep into /System to remove them.
    --c

  • Application Diagnostics takes long long time to generate output report

    Hello All
    Please give me suggestion how can I improve performance of Application Diagnostics. It takes long long time to generate output report for a single transaction, i.e. Invoice.
    Thanks
    Makshud

    Do you have the statistics collected up to date?
    Please make sure you have applied the latest patch as per these docs.
    E-Business Suite Diagnostics Installation Guide [ID 167000.1]
    E-Business Suite Diagnostic Tools FAQ and Troubleshooting Guide for Release 11i and R12 [ID 235307.1]
    If you still have any performance issues when running the tool, I would suggest you log a SR.
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Converting a Wide String to unsigned long long?

    Hi there,
    I am looking for a way to convert a string to unsigned long long on
    Solaris. On AIX and Linux, there is wcstoull. However, I do not find
    that in solaris. So, I plan to use swscanf ( str, L"%llu", &val).
    However, running thru Rational Purify, each call to swscanf leaks 1
    byte.
    Anyone has a 3rd solution other than the two above? Or maybe there
    is fix to the swscanf leak?
    Thanks in advance,
    Miranda

    % man -s 3C strtoull

  • Binary variable view does not work for long long int

    According to this document CVI 2013 supports long long int. While clang probably does, the variable view does not always support it... If you want to look at the value of a long long int variable and choose the binary format, the value may be too large to be displayed, see below: nothing is displayed if too many digits are required - actually 64 digits should be supported but aren't
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Yep, looks like a bug: 423654.
    Support for long long's are not new to 2013, by the way. They've been supported since 2009, as long as you enabled the C99 extensions option.

  • Alternate to long long in Solaris 10

    Hi,
    Is there an alternate to long long data type in Solaris? We aren't able to find one.
    We have tried using xarch=v9 and something like xsupport=ultra; But we can't execute it on a 32-bit machine.
    Hence we need a substitute for long long data type to compile and execute on a 32-bit machine.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Chakra

    Type long long is supported in 32-bit programs on Solaris, using Sun compilers. Example:
    #include <stdio.h>
    int main()
    long long ll = 123456789;
    long long xx = ll * ll;
    printf("result = %lld\n", xx);
    return 0;
    You can compile this code with the C or C++ compiler with no special options.
    What kind of alternative did you have in mind?
    The -xarch=v9 option sets the target architecture, not just the sizes of data types. When you compile -xarch=v9, you get code that runs only on a v9 system, and you cannot mix it with 32-bit code.

  • A long long pain-staking task...is this the only way?

    Hi all
    I am tasked with tracking and blurring faces on videos. The footage is terrible, shaky, out of focus at times, low light and the faces going in and out the shot all the time. The way I'm doing this is, in this example with two faces, have 5 video tracks and 1 audio track. On the first vid track I have the untouched video, above that the 2nd video track with guassian blur applied to it and track matte key to the 3rd track, the 3rd track is a square white tile which I then move around as required over the face of person number 1. The 4th video track is a copy of track 2 but keyd to track 5, and track 5 a repeat of 3 with the tile to move around over the face of person number 2. It's a long long task to manually move the tile over the faces, almost frame by frame at times for 2 faces on a 30 minute video. I have spent days researching how to automate this but the trackers in AE and Davincei Resolve Lite need about as much work to reset them when they lose the track as I'm doing in the manual process I outlined.
    My question is, before I just submit to days of manual labour and get the hell on with it, does anyone know of a way to make this easier? Preferably some magic plugin from science fiction to do it for me.

    Why not simplify your tracks down to a single blurred title track (for each face).
    eg create a square rectangle in Titler, apply a  degree of opacity then some blur (fx) if required.
    Make a few at the same time to cover your requirements.

  • Oracle 10 Pro*C/C++ does not like long long type on AIX 5.3 ?

    AIX 5.3.0.4
    Oracle 10.1.0.2
    I have a sample proc program in "a.pc":
    #include <sqlca.h>
    int testProc ( int abc )
    long long i = -1LL;
    when I tried Oracle 10 proc to compile this program .. Proc gives error:
    Syntax error at line 5, column 20, file a.pc
    long long i = -1LL;
    ---------------------------1
    PCC-S-02201, Encountered the symbol "L" when expecting one of the following:
    ; , = ( [ * ? .........
    The symbol ";" was substituted for "L" to contine.
    Error at line 0, column 0 in file a.pc
    PCC-F-02102, Fatal error while doing C preprocessing.
    The type "LL" is "long long" in AIX 5.3. I tested a simplar C program, which is handled without problem in xlC compiler; however this it is only error in the Pro*C/C++.
    Does anyone seen this before? Or is it some limitation on Oracle?

    You've landed in the wrong forum. This one's for Oracle Application Express. You might try this one instead:
    C++ Call Interface (OCCI)
    Sergio

  • Using long longs in a 32 bit app

    What restrictions do I need to observe if I use long long ints (or off_t or fpos_t) in a 32 bit app? If I return a 64 bit value from a function, will that change the alignment of all function calls in the project? Can I use structs that contain long longs without affecting call alignments?

    I don't have another
    compiler/debugger to use, but I make more progress by
    inserting my own debugging statements than with GDB.
    You're not the only one!
    If there is an alignment problem, the source is probably not in GCC. Even though using a long long is a little unusual for people like me, I'm sure there are enough people using long long in GCC to have worked out the bugs.
    Are you doing pointer arithmetic? Are you assuming that the way you have defined your C structure is the way it looks in memory? Is it possible you have endian issues?
    I would suggest starting a new thread. I think the only thing you've done wrong is assume that it is an alignment issue with GCC/GDB and asked a specific question about that. If you frame your question in terms of "I'm crashing here - anybody know why?" you'll get better responses. Of course, the ideal is a very small piece of runnable code the reproduces the error. I know that is usually not possible, but try the best you can. If nothing else, post the structures as you define them and then post some code examples of how you pass them and then how you use them.
    Switching to C++ is another can of worms you probably don't want. I would rather see you use C than Python or Java. Just post some source code here or in a new thread and we'll take a look at it. Having another set of eyes makes a huge difference.

  • Photos not importing raw pef ( pentax raw ) files

    Hi,
    recently updated my 2010 macbook pro to the latest version of mavericks.
    All my previously imported files are there - jpg, and raw, but trying to import some new photos it seems that only jpg's are being imported.
    My pentax k10d is set to save in pef format as they are smaller than the adobe format raw photos.
    Does anyone have any ideas how to import raw?
    The saved photos on the sd card have the same name for both raw and jpg - only the extension is different.
    I've checked in photos to see if there is a raw file 'behind' the jpg but the options for reprocessing raw and 'use raw as original' are greyed out. I can see that all the files are on the sd card in finder - I even tried dragging the raw files to the photos app from finder with no success.
    Thanks,
    Mark

    The RAW files of your camera are supported by MacOS X 10.10.x.
    My pentax k10d is set to save in pef format as they are smaller than the adobe format raw photos.
    That may be the problem. For some supported cameras only the uncompressed RAW files are supported.  Have you tried to take a picture with uncompressed RAW? Will that be imported by Photos?

Maybe you are looking for