Dates in MD04 not matching with dat00 field of structure MDTBX

Hi,
I am trying to populate MDTBX structure using DTNUM field of MDKP as follows.
"IMPORT mdtbx FROM DATABASE mdtc(ar) ID wa_mdkp-dtnum".
Now the DATOO field of MDTBX will be same as dates in MD04 for a material , plant and a Vendor.
But for some vendors DATOO of MDTBX has more dates when compared to dates in MD04 for the same Material and Plant.
Why it happens so? I need the reply urgently. Kindly help me in this regard.

Hi,
To add the filed in the extract strucuure...
Go to rsa6 find your data source... go to change mode >
then double click on the extract structure... it will tale youe to the structure screen..
Click on the Append strucutre button and add your required filed there... activate the append structure... go back and activate the structure also.
now go back to rsa6 and again go into your data source now you can see the appended field, but it will be hidded. Remove that hiddedn check box... Save.
Then write the code to pupulate data into that field.
Regards,

Similar Messages

Clean-up all data that did not match with the selection.

Hi Everyone,
In my requirement I need to Clean-up all data that did not match with the selection from my internal table lt_cdpos.....in this case wat can i use like.'Refresh' or ' Clear' or 'DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM lt_cdpos'.
Pls suggest me...

Hi Meenakshi
Try delete lt_cdpos where kunnr NE KUNNR (from selection screen) .
Before Checking <condition> make sure both comparing field type match with each other.
You can use FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT' for append leading zeros in compare condition before comparing kunnr from selection screen
Regards
Parveen

Getting error when view - Requested data type does not match with existing

I have the siebel web service
In the BI publisher as mentioned in the 'Siebel_BI_Publisher_Integration_Concepts.pdf', I have imported the siebel web service
BI can recognize the 'Web service' and methods.
I have created the paramters. The data type is 'String'
When I try to view the report using the BI publisher, I am getting teh following error in th UI
"Requested data type does not match with existing data type"
This is the first time I am using BI publisher to call the Siebel web service. I don't know what this error means
I don't know whether any log file generated wit the details of this erro message
Any help is much appriciated
Thanks,
Kavitha

Hi all,
have you find a fix for this issue? Im facing the same situation, using Complex type, and String data type both in the service and Bi publisher. We are consuming CC&B services, and we have noticed this error appears when BIPublisher is running on WebLogic (10.3) but it does not appear when BIPublisher is running on OC4J , of course running the same report on both application servers.
Any idea?
Thanks a lot, regards
Nestor

PO : Invoice value in ME23N is not matching with 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO

Hi Expert,
              1) Invoice value in ME23N tcode is not matching with datasource 2LIS_02_SCL field BWGEO in item level
for few item BWGEO field contain the data with tax but for few item the value is not coming correctly.
2) The value is not matching for that particular item which has same material document in other Item level.
eg. PO(eg 60000XXXXX) if item 1 has invoice value with tax is 1300+52 and its material doc is XXXX1234. if same material doc XXXX1234 is present in
item 2 for another invoice of same material invoice value with tax is 1200+48. In that case the value which is coming in
BWGEO field is 1300 only.
I am working in 7.0 system for AFS specific. My whole transaction is in INR.
Thanks and Regards
Lalit Kumar

Please review the information below from one of our deverlopers
- it may explain the behaviour you are seeing on your system:
When posting a GOODS RECEIPT for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG
and XMCEKET-WEWRT) and not the invoice values (XMCEKET-REMNG and
XMCEKET-REWRT).
When posting an INVOICE for a DELTA UPLOAD process you only will
have the information regarding the INVOICE values (XMCEKET-REMNG
and XMCEKET-REWRT) and not the GOODS RECEIPT values (XMCEKET-WEMNG and
XMCEKET-WEWRT).
The DELTA INIT process is different, because for this process, all
information about posted documents against a purchasing order need to
processed again and this means that all documents related to an order
(invoices, goods receipt, deliver costs, goods issue, etc)
are read from database and rebuild one by one in the same process, and
of course this information in available.
When posting an invoice, the goods receipt information is not
available because of the following reasons:
1 - System standard fields.
In datasource 2LIS_02_SCL, there is only
fields BWMNG - that represents quantity, BWGEO and BWGEO that
represent values. The information under these fields are dependent
from the information of field BWVORG (BW transaction key). This field
determines whether these values are from a purchasing order, goods
receipt or an invoice. You never have a missing information, but when
you want to get goods receipt values, you need to check where the
BWVORG correspond to goods receipt process and not invoice.
2 - Performance
There are documents as purchasing orders and schedule agreements that
are opened for years in some customer system (it may not be your case),
where goods receipt and invoices have been posted during all this time.
Every time that a new document is posted in order to built the
cancellation sentence (ROCANCEL = X) and in order to add the new
value in the old, system need to process all previous posted documents,
and this means processing time. For this reason when posting invoices
only previous documents that are invoices are taken into account and
not goods receipt.
The delta fields, DBWMNG and DBWGEO, are the difference between the
purchasing order quantity and values and the goods receipt quantity
and values, then is natural that this information is only available
when processing a goods receipt and not when processing an invoice.
I'm sorry if this is not the system behavior that you are expecting,
but this is the normal standard behavior and this is really necessary
because of the system performance when dealing with documents that
have a long order history.
Hope this information is useful for you
Best Regards
Barry

Acquire sound data time does not match with the waveform graph

i am doing a basic data logging system to see the frequency behavior of sound. What I did is to use the "acquire sound" system of Labview and connect a waveform graph to see the time-domain behavior of sound.
However, if I input a duration of 4 seconds (or any time), I will only see 75% of the sound (that is 3 seconds). I tried to extract the values using write to file to see if the waveform graph is the one who have the delay. however, the data also showed me 3seconds.
I will attach here the picture of the simple program i created.
I hope someone can explain to me why this happen.
I am using the soundcard and microphone of a laptop. I also tried using a computer microphone. I have tried this program to all computers I can use (2 laptops: SAMSUNG, ASUS, and one desktop computer core i5)

Hi all,
have you find a fix for this issue? Im facing the same situation, using Complex type, and String data type both in the service and Bi publisher. We are consuming CC&B services, and we have noticed this error appears when BIPublisher is running on WebLogic (10.3) but it does not appear when BIPublisher is running on OC4J , of course running the same report on both application servers.
Any idea?
Thanks a lot, regards
Nestor

0FC_OP_01 extractor issues- DFFKKOPBW data not matching with

Hi All
We have an issue with the extractor 0FC_OP_01. Our business is comparing the values in
R/3 report u2013 G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277) with the
Open Items by GL Account report in BW .(actually these values in the BW report are coming from DFKKOPBW table in R/3) .
But since august, the R/3 G/L account balance report is not matching with the DFKKOPBW table balances. So bottom line the extractor 0FC_OP_01 is doing something wrong when populating the DFKKOPBW table which is causing these two reports to be out of balance
Did anybody face this kind of issue before? Please Advise.
FYI : We are following the same procedure to populate the DFKKOPBW table as in the below article.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a9996115-0b01-0010-b2b2-d9de0170a425;jsessionid=%28J2EE3417800%29ID0001499250DB01896329908162586522End
Thanks
KPK

In my case the Cube/PSA data itself is not matching with the R/3 report data.
Basically we run a job in R/3 in t-code FPBW with a Date id and Indentification. This job will pull the entries from base table DFKKOP into DFKKOPBW table .Then FRom this DFKKOPBW table data is loaded into PSA/Cube.
Here in my case the data in table DFKKOPBW itself is not matching with the R/3 report - G/L Account Balance Display (t-code S_ALR_87012277)) .
I am following the same procedure to run the JOb in T-code FPBW to populate the DFKKOPBW table as listed in the document at the above link. Moreover this difference in balances is occuring only starting from August ..Till July the balances in DFKKOPBW tally with the R/3report.
Please advise ..
Thanks
KPK

The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assi

Hi ,
We have enabled context sensitive DFF in Bank Branch Page for HZ_PARTIES DFF , We have created Flex Map so that only bank branch context fields are only displayed in the bank branch page and as we know party information DFF is shared by supplier and Customer Page so we dint want to see any Bank Branch fields or context information in those pages.
We have achieved the requirement but when open existing branches bank branch update is throwing below error message :
"The value in flexfield context reference web bean does not match with the value in the context of the Descriptive flexfield web bean BranchDescFlex. If this in not intended, please go back to correct the data or contact your Systems Administrator for assistance."
this error is thrown only when we open existing branches, if we save existing branch and open then it is not throwing any error message.
Please let us know reason behind this error message.
Thanks,
Mruduala

You are kidding? It took me about 3 minutes to scroll down on my tab to get to the triplex button!
Habe you read the error message?
Quote:
java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-04098: trigger 'PMS.PROJECT_SEQ' is invalid and failed re-validation
Check the trigger and it should work again.
Timo

Inventory data not matching with R/3

Hi,
In R/3 production we have the data from 1999-Till date.From 1999-2004 Data was archieved in R/3 system.So we have two years live data in the R/3 production.
We have filled the setup tables and extracted the Inventory data then loaded into 0IC_C03 Cube.
But the values in BW report from 0IC_C03 is not matching with the values in R/3 report.
1.What could be the reason?
2.If we need to extract the archieved data from R/3 what are the steps we need to do?.
Pls help us with your suggestions.

We have followed as per the How to handle inventory managment document.
The quanity value is matching between R/3 and BW.But the Valuated Stock Value is not matching for some of the materials.For the current period it showing the right value(for ex.if we check for 12th Month).
But If we check the material for old months like October,Aug the value of valuated stock value is not matching with R/3 for some of the materials.
In RSDV validity table date maintained from 1999-Dec'200.
We are using the standard business content cubes and update rules.Is there any change needs to be done in update rules for 0IC_C03 cube to get the right values for all the materials?..
Pls help with your inputs.
Thanks
Soujanya

Planning area data not matching with backup cube / PSA

Hi friends,
while loading data from planning area to backup cube , for the key figure ( result of a macro),the data in planning area is not matching with PSA as well as with cube.
At the same time Data is matching at total level but not at disagregated level. And many times it disagregate in equal Proportion in cube/psa.
Pls its urgent.
Pts for sure.
Vishal.
9326179903

make sure you have replicated the extraction of the data source. This is needed to ensure your backup cube gets the current data as in the planning area
if you got to /SAPAPO/SDP_EXTR then you can see this button
you can set this up as a program scheduled to run before the updation of your cube
As for the disaggregation, test at what level you are choosing your characteristic? ( i suppose you can choose the level)
Are you extracting at a detailed level or at the aggregated level
Is your macro saving the data into a Keyfigure or is it an auxilliary KF or something?

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

Posting date in AFRU and 2lis_04_p_arbpl data source is not matching

Hi Experts,
We are facing an issue with 2LIS_04_P_ARBPL data source, posting date in AFRU table and in data source is not matching.
For example: we booked an activity confirmation of value 100 on 01.01.2015 posting date, Counter 1, Operation 10
For the same operation another counter is confirmed on 01.02.2015 posting date.
So, in AFRU table:
Prod Order     Operation     Confirmation Number     Counter     PostingDate     Activity
1001               10               8001                             1              01.01.2015       100
1001               10               8001                             2              01.02.2015       0
In 2lis_04_p_arbpl data source, counter field is missing due to which only 1 record is coming which is:
Prod Order     Operation     Confirmation Number     Counter     PostingDate     Activity
1001               10               8001                             1              01.02.2015       100
In data source, activity of value 100 is coming on 01.02.2015 date instead in AFRU table it is booked on 01.01.2015 posting date by which we are unable to match the value in query which is based on posting date.
Please help on this.
Thanks,
Sameer

Hi Sameer,
Please check on which date the production order has status as "completed".
It could be on 01.02.2015.
Thanks,
Vimal

GL balances are not matching with Fixed assets ledger

Hi,
Please suggest me regarding this...
The issues is:when the legacy balances are uploaded in to sap there was the mistake.3 assets were entered twice(once in asset class 1250 & once in asset class 1300).It causes the GL balances are not matching with Fixed Asset balances(GL is less than FA).so now the client is asking to make manual entry by removing the recconcilation account settings and post manual entry then keep the reconcilation account as usual.They wanted to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated asssets for year 2007 & 2008.
How can i achieve the below:
1.GL balance was not equal (i.e lower) to FA ledger even at the time of go live(FI is lesser than FA)
2.For this i need to post one manual entry in FI-GL with the GO-LIVE date.is it possible? suggest me how to post?
3.After that i need to reverse the accumulated depreciation for the above 3 duplicated assets.how can i do this?
4.After that i need to remove the above 3 duplicated assets,how can i?
Please help me by giving your thoughts regarding this
Thanks
Sap Guru

Hi,
It is possible to post the adjustment entry from go live date provided you open the posting periods for the pervious year. (However this approach is not recommended for the following reasons - you have closed the books and must have published the results to local authorities. Adjustment now in the past year can cause some trouble from auditors etc. Secondly you are adjusting the GL balance for the last year, so you will have to complete the period end and year end closing for GL balances. So avoid kindly it)
For your problem - Go to transaction code OASV and post adjustment entry for the current period. Also check if your field status of assets contain field for shutdown of assets. If not change your field status accordingly. Once adjustment is done you shutdown the asset so that it does not post depreciation in future depreciation runs. (this will cater to your need of eliminating the assets. If you retire the asset then you will have to deal with gain or loss on retirement of an asset. If you can accommodate this entry, then you can use this figure in the final adjustment entry.)
Or Go to transaction code OAMK and set the recon account to post the adjustment entry.
Reversal of depreciation is not possible in SAP. So the only way to reverse the accumulated depreciation is by changing the recon account or using OASV, and passing adjustment entry.
regards
Thomas

Entry View is not matching with General Ledger View in a document

Dear Experts
My problem is entry view is not matching with general ledger view because of profit center. I have posted the general ledger account with posting key 40 and profit center 1200 but when we see the same through general ledger view getting different profit center (i.e. 1410).
Offsetting general ledger account is compulsory ? if it is working for one general ledger account it should support other general ledger accounts also, but it is not the same in our scenario. Any customization level problem ?
Earliest help is needed.
Thanks - VG.

Hello VG,
In the general ledger view, the line items for the selected ledger are taken from a data merge between the document line items in the entry view and the document line items in the general ledger view. In the case of fields that exist in both views, the data in the general ledger view takes priority. However, fields are only transferred from the general ledger view to the fields in the entry view if they are active in the relevant ledger. If fields exist in the general ledger table group but are not active in the relevant ledger, they are transferred from the entry view. In the data merge, amounts in the entry view are in some cases (such as cash discounts) distributed proportionately across the amounts in the general ledger view. This is necessary if, as a result of document splitting, a line item in the entry view has been split into multiple line items in the general ledger view. The proportionately distributed amounts in the entry view cannot then be used for reconciliation with account balances because the total of the cash discount amounts from the line items, for example, does not correspond to the balance of the cash discount account as a result of the rounding differences.
Pls check this,
Rgds
Manish

Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

Dear all,
When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
Deticked all check boxes in it.
Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
Jeyakanthan

Hai!
What version of SAP B1 u r using.
I do got the same problem for my customer. I did this..
1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
2. Export to Excel
3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
4. Export TB to Excel.
5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
*Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
*Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
9. see the reconcillation details.
10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
Regards,
Thanga Raj.K
+91 9710445987

GL - Balances do not match with sum of Items

Hi,
I have a requirement in which I am pulling opening, closing balance and a list of all transactions (or items ) on a daily basis from GL to a flat file, and then loading in a third-party tool . Now, the issue is sum of all items (gl_je_lines ) should match with the diference of closing and opening balances.
I reconcilied the items with Oracle's Journal Report. Items are matching.
I also confirmed that closing balance of previous day matches with the opening balance of current date.
But, ( closing balance ) - (opening balance) does not match with sum(items)
I am using gl_daily _balances for opening and closing balance.
Waiting for your inputs/suggestions..
Yogini

Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
I am not using GL_INTERFACE. The tables I am using for Daily balances are:
gl_daily_balances
gl_code_combinations
chart_of_accounts
And for the items, I am using gl_je_lines, gl_je_headers.
Also, I am interested in Entered Amount in GBP as the Functional Currency is GBP and there are many transacitons in different foreign currencies.
More updates : I found that I have calculate the Entered Amount in GBP from all Converted/Transferred/Entered amounts in different currencies.
So, I tried the following :
(Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'U'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
MINUS
( Select Sum(end_of_date_balance)
from gl_daily_balances
where Currency_code = 'GBP'
and currency_type = 'C'
and accounting_date = sysdate -1 --Opening balance
This way, I got opening and closing balance, but still the differernce between opening and closing balance is not matching with the sum of Items.
Any suggestions / inputs are highly appreciated.
Yogini

Dates in MD04 not matching with dat00 field of structure MDTBX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for