DB Utilization reaching Max in BI

Hi BW Experts,
In Our project, frequently we got a alert message saying that, DB Utilization is reaching 100%. In front end we are loading less number of records. But still every day we got a alert message. Can you please help me how to reduce the DB Utilization in Production. And also where to check whether DB Utilization is reaching maximum in %. Just want to know, is it because of Lookup code from big table of data ? Please suggest why it is occuring.
Thanks.

Hi Jalina,
Please try checking the below:-
I) From Basis End
   i) Ask them to check if DB backups are scheduled regularly or any issues with the same.
II) From BW end:-
    i) Check the frequency of Data stored at your PSA level and how regularly have your House keeping Jobs to delete PSA , Data mart requests are running .
   ii)There are huge tables " RSBATCHDATA" and "RSDTPERRORLOG" the Data in which  needs to be deleted since they occupy a huge space in the system,
iii) Check if your Cubes are compressed which will further help to reduce the utilization.
Please do revert in case you need any further details.
Thanks & Regards,
RDS.

Similar Messages

  • Material Transaction sequence reached max limit in Version 11.0.3

    Problem Desc:
    Oracle Applications Version 11.0.3
    Material Transaction sequence reached max limit.
    Material Transaction sequence got exhausted.
    All the material transacted got stuck in AQ Process.
    Material transactions done are pertaining to PO Receipts, Sub Inventory transfer, Inter Org transfer,
    Could you please advice a solution.
    Thanks and Regards
    Aditya

    Hello,
    I had similar problem standard seq reached max limit. I could not book sales order. Solution from metalink was simple alter seq.
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B13789_01/server.101/b10759/statements_6014.htm
    MAXVALUE
    Specify the maximum value the sequence can generate. This integer value can have 28 or fewer digits. MAXVALUE must be equal to or greater than START WITH and must be greater than MINVALUE.
    Regards,
    Luko

  • BEA-000627  issue.. reached max pool capacity

    I got this reached max pool capacity error msg shown below..
    What is confusing to me is , how does the increment level become -ve... Shoudnt it be zero instead of -11 ?
    <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool "aPool", making "-11" new resource instances instead of "5".>
    Then a stack trace follows this error message saying
    negativeArraySizeException, which is understandable becoz it is trying to increase the pool by -11.. The stack trace is shown below...
    Has anyone seem anything like this ? Any thoughts ?
    java.sql.SQLException: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.JDBCUtil.wrapAndThrowResourceException(JDBCUtil.java:209)
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getPoolConnection(RmiDataSource.java:316)
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:333)

    pc cp wrote:
    I got this reached max pool capacity error msg shown below..
    What is confusing to me is , how does the increment level become -ve... Shoudnt it be zero instead of -11 ?
    <BEA-000627> <Reached maximum capacity of pool "aPool", making "-11" new resource instances instead of "5".>
    Then a stack trace follows this error message saying
    negativeArraySizeException, which is understandable becoz it is trying to increase the pool by -11.. The stack trace is shown below...
    Has anyone seem anything like this ? Any thoughts ?
    java.sql.SQLException: java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.JDBCUtil.wrapAndThrowResourceException(JDBCUtil.java:209)
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getPoolConnection(RmiDataSource.java:316)
    at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:333)Certainly it's a bug, and likely already fixed. What version of weblogic is this?
    Joe

  • %ASA-2-321005: System CPU utilization reached 2840655%

    Anyone ever seen a message like this?
    We're running v8.4(2) on a 5520. We detected no other anomolies around that middle-of-the-night timeframe.

    Exactly, that is expected with the bug
    Read the description of the bug:
    This bug causes this message to be generated erroneously with incorrect CPU usage, for instance:
    %ASA-2-321005: System CPU utilization reached 4294967%
    %ASA-2-321005: System CPU utilization reached 4294964%
    Conditions:
    NA
    Workaround:
    This is a cosmetic issue

  • Restarting Apache on reaching Max Connections

    Hi All,
    We are using OAS 10.1.3.1 in Solaris environment. Presently we have set max connections to 350. Once connections reaches max, apache is getting hanged & it resumes once we restart services using opmnctl. Is there any way to make restart apache by itself, once it reaches max connections.
    thanx & regards

    hi...
    the best thing you can do is increase the max connection value... is it a prod insatance? since normally for prod instances its a higher value.
    Rgds...R

  • Packet to client, reached max retries

    Hi all!
    I have a problem what I can't resolve.
    I have 5 c861W router, and I configured to use WDS. It works fine.
    but in the log I see this messages:
    Apr 16 08:47:12: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station ****.****.**** Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2-CP]
    Apr 16 08:48:10: %DOT11-6-ROAMED: Station ****.****.**** Roamed to ****.****.****
    Apr 16 08:48:10: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station ****.****.****
    Apr 16 08:48:10: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client ****.****.**** reached max retries, removing the client
    Apr 16 08:49:10: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station ****.****.**** Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2-CP]
    Apr 16 08:49:49: %DOT11-6-ROAMED: Station ****.****.**** Roamed to ****.****.****
    Apr 16 08:49:49: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station ****.****.****
    Apr 16 08:49:49: %DOT11-4-MAXRETRIES: Packet to client ****.****.**** reached max retries, removing the client
    I tried what guides suggested, I checked the carrier test but all of the channels on 1-10%. I tried to set non overlapping channels as far as i can, and set fragment-threshold to 1024.
    I have no idea what is the problem. I thing channels aren't noisy. Not just one client do this, don't think it is a client problem.
    Something is missconfigured?
    here is a config sample:
    interface Dot11Radio0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    encryption vlan 1 mode ciphers tkip
    encryption vlan 100 mode ciphers tkip
    ssid my_ssid
    ssid my_ssid2
    channel 2437
    fragment-threshold 1024
    station-role root
    no dot11 extension aironet
    any idea?
    thank you!

    I have a similar issue-see http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Wireless%20-%20Mobility&topic=General&topicID=.ee6e8b8&fromOutline=&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cd2aae9 for details.

  • Can't reach max (also with fancontrol) and min fan speed manually

    I'm using fancontrol to control my fan's speed. One thing I noticed is that maximum fan speed is never reached even when temperatures exceed max limit.
    If I set max temperature in /etc/fancontrol to 55 and restart fancontrol, 55+°C will cause fan to speed only at ~5800 RPM. If I set min temperature to 60, fans will completely stop. 'pwm_enable' is set to 1 when fancontrol is running.
    Now if I stop fancontrol, fan will speed up to ~6460 RPM while 'pwm' is at 255 and 'pwm_enable' changed to 0. I can't change 'pwm' value at this point. If 'pwm' gets set to 0, fan will completely stop.
    At this point fancontrol is still not running. If I set 'pwm_enable' to 1 and leave 'pwm' at 255, fan will slow down to ~5800 RPM. If I set 'pwm' to 0, fan will not slow down completely, but will instead slow down to ~2080 RPM.
    What's interesting is that although fancontrol can't reach max fan speed, it can stop fan completely, while I can do neither manually.
    Any idea how to enable at least max fan speed for fancontrol?

    I'm using fancontrol to control my fan's speed. One thing I noticed is that maximum fan speed is never reached even when temperatures exceed max limit.
    If I set max temperature in /etc/fancontrol to 55 and restart fancontrol, 55+°C will cause fan to speed only at ~5800 RPM. If I set min temperature to 60, fans will completely stop. 'pwm_enable' is set to 1 when fancontrol is running.
    Now if I stop fancontrol, fan will speed up to ~6460 RPM while 'pwm' is at 255 and 'pwm_enable' changed to 0. I can't change 'pwm' value at this point. If 'pwm' gets set to 0, fan will completely stop.
    At this point fancontrol is still not running. If I set 'pwm_enable' to 1 and leave 'pwm' at 255, fan will slow down to ~5800 RPM. If I set 'pwm' to 0, fan will not slow down completely, but will instead slow down to ~2080 RPM.
    What's interesting is that although fancontrol can't reach max fan speed, it can stop fan completely, while I can do neither manually.
    Any idea how to enable at least max fan speed for fancontrol?

  • Apache POST flex2gateway never closes or times out, reaches max child processes

    We have been trying to pass an external PCI scan, and noticed some server lockups after starting a scan.  We are scanning a couple hundred IP addresses, which all resolve to the same servers.  The scans are actively looking for vulnerabilities on the box, and one of which is flash remoting.  When we look at the apache /server-status page, it shows a ton of long running flex2gateway processes.  For instance:
    22-4
    4466
    0/3817/3817
    W
    4.07
    163840
    0
    0.0
    57.76
    57.76
    x.x.x.101
    WebNode2.ambassador.int
    POST /flex2gateway/http HTTP/1.1
    As you can see, this POST request has been running for 163840 seconds, or nearly two days.  Since it seems these POST requests never complete, even though the client has long since disconnected, they simply stack up until the server's max number of child processes has been reached, effectively killing our webserver.
    When I try to restart the clustered coldfusion instances one at a time, these POST requests do not die off.
    If I stop both clustered CF instances, the requests complete (or get killed).
    If I reload or restart apache, the requests are gone as well.
    strace gives me nothing useful:
    [root@WebNode1 ~]# strace -p 34025
    Process 34025 attached - interrupt to quit
    read(185,
    pstack gives a little more, but nothing that looks obvious to me:
    [root@WebNode1 ~]# pstack -p 34025     
    Usage: pstack <process-id>
    [root@WebNode1 ~]# pstack 34025  
    #0  0x00007fdd40444740 in __read_nocancel () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
    #1  0x00007fdd33efe2e6 in jk_tcp_socket_recvfull () from /opt/coldfusion10/config/wsconfig/1/mod_jk.so
    #2  0x00007fdd33f1b68d in ajp_connection_tcp_get_message () from /opt/coldfusion10/config/wsconfig/1/mod_jk.so
    #3  0x00007fdd33f1ceea in ajp_get_reply () from /opt/coldfusion10/config/wsconfig/1/mod_jk.so
    #4  0x00007fdd33f20308 in ajp_service () from /opt/coldfusion10/config/wsconfig/1/mod_jk.so
    #5  0x00007fdd33ef8f5d in jk_handler () from /opt/coldfusion10/config/wsconfig/1/mod_jk.so
    #6  0x00007fdd41b92cd0 in ap_run_handler ()
    #7  0x00007fdd41b9658e in ap_invoke_handler ()
    #8  0x00007fdd41ba1c50 in ap_process_request ()
    #9  0x00007fdd41b9eac8 in ?? ()
    #10 0x00007fdd41b9a7d8 in ap_run_process_connection ()
    #11 0x00007fdd41ba6ad7 in ?? ()
    #12 0x00007fdd41ba6dea in ?? ()
    #13 0x00007fdd41ba7a6c in ap_mpm_run ()
    #14 0x00007fdd41b7e9b0 in main ()
    I dont know what that tells us exactly, but I'm leaning toward the hangup between apache and tomcat. 
    Any suggestions on where how to troubleshoot this issue?

    On a test server, I have removed the wildcard from the uriworkermap.properties file, so it now only matches "/flex2gateway" and "/flex2gateway/".  Unfortunately I'm still seeing the occasional hung apache worker. 
    Anyone have any leads on this issue?  I don't mind doing the research, I'v just exhausted the limits of my Google Fu.
    Apache Server Status for 10.10.10.205
    Server Version: Apache/2.2.15 (Unix) DAV/2 PHP/5.3.3 mod_ssl/2.2.15 OpenSSL/1.0.1e-fips mod_wsgi/3.2 Python/2.6.6 mod_jk/1.2.32 mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.10.1
    Server Built: Oct 16 2014 14:48:21
    Current Time: Monday, 10-Nov-2014 16:49:22 EST
    Restart Time: Monday, 10-Nov-2014 15:25:16 EST
    Parent Server Generation: 0
    Server uptime: 1 hour 24 minutes 6 seconds
    Total accesses: 5313 - Total Traffic: 98.4 MB
    CPU Usage: u3.97 s1.26 cu0 cs0 - .104% CPU load
    1.05 requests/sec - 20.0 kB/second - 19.0 kB/request
    15 requests currently being processed, 11 idle workers
    WWWWWWW_W_W_W__W__W__WW_W_...................................... ................................................................ ................................................................ ................................................................
    Scoreboard Key:
    "_" Waiting for Connection, "S" Starting up, "R" Reading Request,
    "W" Sending Reply, "K" Keepalive (read), "D" DNS Lookup,
    "C" Closing connection, "L" Logging, "G" Gracefully finishing,
    "I" Idle cleanup of worker, "." Open slot with no current process
    Srv
    PID
    Acc
    M
    CPU
    SS
    Req
    Conn
    Child
    Slot
    Client
    VHost
    Request
    0-0
    8727
    0/12/12
    W
    0.03
    4572
    0
    0.0
    0.05
    0.05
    10.10.2.201
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    1-0
    8728
    0/11/11
    W
    0.03
    4358
    0
    0.0
    0.18
    0.18
    10.10.2.201
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    2-0
    8729
    0/38/38
    W
    0.04
    3910
    0
    0.0
    1.11
    1.11
    10.10.2.201
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    3-0
    8730
    0/27/27
    W
    0.03
    4064
    0
    0.0
    0.79
    0.79
    10.10.2.201
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    4-0
    8731
    0/16/16
    W
    0.03
    4354
    0
    0.0
    0.12
    0.12
    10.10.2.201
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    5-0
    8732
    0/7/7
    W
    0.02
    4564
    0
    0.0
    0.02
    0.02
    10.10.2.201
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    6-0
    8733
    0/8/8
    W
    0.02
    4673
    0
    0.0
    0.01
    0.01
    10.10.2.201
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    7-0
    8734
    0/386/386
    0.37
    4
    0
    0.0
    6.49
    6.49
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/images/login_over.jpg HTTP/1.1
    8-0
    9422
    0/10/10
    W
    0.02
    4564
    0
    0.0
    0.04
    0.04
    10.10.2.201
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    9-0
    10112
    0/393/393
    0.37
    6
    0
    0.0
    14.59
    14.59
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/images/box_onesource.jpg HTTP/1.1
    10-0
    10468
    0/321/321
    W
    0.32
    846
    0
    0.0
    4.42
    4.42
    10.10.2.212
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    11-0
    10470
    0/398/398
    0.38
    6
    0
    0.0
    12.80
    12.80
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/images/home_eco.jpg HTTP/1.1
    12-0
    10471
    0/340/340
    W
    0.32
    837
    0
    0.0
    4.99
    4.99
    10.10.2.212
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway/ HTTP/1.1
    13-0
    10544
    0/404/404
    0.34
    6
    0
    0.0
    5.21
    5.21
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/images/box_top.jpg HTTP/1.1
    14-0
    10592
    0/353/353
    0.40
    6
    12
    0.0
    14.10
    14.10
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /?login HTTP/1.1
    15-0
    10648
    0/296/296
    W
    0.31
    800
    0
    0.0
    3.82
    3.82
    10.10.2.212
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway/ HTTP/1.1
    16-0
    12382
    0/339/339
    0.33
    6
    0
    0.0
    2.85
    2.85
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/images/logo_sourceone.jpg HTTP/1.1
    17-0
    12387
    0/336/336
    0.34
    6
    0
    0.0
    5.06
    5.06
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/images/logo_onesource.jpg HTTP/1.1
    18-0
    12388
    0/265/265
    W
    0.25
    839
    0
    0.0
    2.87
    2.87
    10.10.2.212
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway/ HTTP/1.1
    19-0
    12389
    0/323/323
    0.31
    0
    0
    0.0
    4.82
    4.82
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/lib/dimming.js HTTP/1.1
    20-0
    12390
    0/336/336
    0.31
    4
    0
    0.0
    5.24
    5.24
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/lib/superfish.js HTTP/1.1
    21-0
    12391
    0/289/289
    W
    0.27
    805
    0
    0.0
    2.49
    2.49
    10.10.2.212
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway/ HTTP/1.1
    22-0
    12392
    0/281/281
    W
    0.27
    831
    0
    0.0
    3.17
    3.17
    10.10.2.212
    qc.company.int
    POST /flex2gateway HTTP/1.1
    23-0
    14750
    0/41/41
    0.04
    6
    0
    0.0
    0.92
    0.92
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/images/close.jpg HTTP/1.1
    24-0
    14751
    0/43/43
    W
    0.04
    0
    0
    0.0
    1.21
    1.21
    10.10.2.36
    qc.company.int
    GET /server-status HTTP/1.1
    25-0
    14752
    0/40/40
    0.04
    6
    0
    0.0
    0.96
    0.96
    10.10.2.212
    www.company.qc
    GET /marketingpages/images/box_sourceone.jpg HTTP/1.1

  • Iphone 6+ not reaching max wifi speed

    I have a iphone 6+ with EE. My fibre optic I supplied by Virgin Media at 120mbps. This speed is almost always reached on www.speedtest.net on my PC. But my iPhone 6+ has only ever got 50mbps max. I have a SuperHub2 and I'm using the 5Ghz connection for wifi on the iPhone. I was under the impression that 802.11ac could reach 120mbps.

    iPhone 6 can connect at 433.3 Mbps on 802.11ac. Look in your router and see what it is connecting at.  I have pulled as much as 271 mbps on speedtest while connected to 5ghz 80mhz channel width. Not sure what your router is capable of but take a look there.

  • The amount field in table GLPCT Activity RFBU is reaching max limit of

    Hi Experts,
    Need your help on below issue.
    The amount filed in table GLPCT, company code 123, account 110000, Activity
    RFBU and SD00 is increasing every year, and now the sum is close to the
    limit of 9,999,999,999,999.99- .
    this amount field is continue to increase, if depend on data when
    performing year-end closing and balance carry-forward.
    So, Each field contains 15 places, which leads to a maximum amount of
    999,999,999,999,999 When the value reaches the maximum amount, an
    additional update of an amount is not possible anymore.
    System cannot update the Balance Carry-forward amount for 2012.

    Have you communicated with SAP about a possible solution?

  • Disk Utilization reach 100%

    Hi Experts,
    I'm using oracle 805, the SAS external storage use only for database. The external storage capacity is 2Tb and 60% is free. I check disk utilization using ST06 show 90-99, Kb transfered/s : 47,527. Then I check the processes in SM50, there is no heavy process, a lot of free work process. I check the avg. response time in ST03 seems normal, around 600-700 ms.
    What make the disk utilization high?
    thank you
    Hardono

    Hello,
    This monitor shows entire operating system performance data and you are only talking about SAP processes .
    Have you check in op system task manager for any server process which could cause bad performance?
    Regards.

  • It says I can't open new window cause I have reached max allowed. How do I fix this?

    When I try to open a new window, I have a message pop up that says it could not open a new window cause I have already opened the maximim number. Don't understand how this is possible when I am sure I close out each one when I am done with it. How can you fix this?

    Yes that is a limit of web some web browsers, they need to close any open browsers windows but without know which browser they have exact instruction is hard,,, mustangman5058 can you supply more information.. Like Cody asked is this a web browser you are speaking of and if so which browser are you using?
    Opera Mobile or Dolphin HD allows the most windows to be opened at the same timefor me.

  • My i tunes valume bar wont reach max volume on my mac, whats up with that?

    Im trying to lysten to some filthy dubstep and my itunes wont turn up completely. the highest it goes is up to about 75% then it stops. I turn it up and it snaps back to 75% without a change in volume.  Whats up with that?

    Just guessing, but could it have anything to do with Sound Check. iTunes Preferences/Playback/Sound Check.  Do you have that selected.

  • HT204053 Hello l bought second hand iphone 4 and l cant Log in lclood because System says that l reach max number of free Apple accounts so how can l erase old accounts that l dont know ???

    Where l have to write msg or do to solve my ıd problem l want to use l cloud but there are multiple accounts on my ıphone from old user l need to erase old accounts to use mine pls help me

    You can't erase or delete iCloud accounts, you can only stop using them.  If the previous owner already created the maximum number of iCloud accounts on your phone, all you can do is either re-use one of the accounts previously created, or create a new account to use on another iOS device or Mac (running OS X 10.7.2 or later), if you have one.

  • Trace file size reached the max size

    Hi All,
    This morning we had a issue with the oracle trace file. When I looked the alert log, i figured that there was an error saying Trace file reached max size. Question is what happens to the processes that tries to write to the trace file when the trace file was full?
    My thinking is, the process, that tries to write to trace file, will hang until the trace file size is incresed. Am I correct. Please share you thoughts
    Thanks
    --

    Process will continue, it will not hang. Trace information will not be written once the trace file limit is reached.
    HTH
    Srini

Maybe you are looking for