DCexport.exe process taking a lot of cpu's power
Hi everyone!
Does anyone know where DCexport.exe comes from? I believe its used by dynamic converter is this right?
we use dynamic converter to get the html conversion from word documents to present the results on our intranet solution.
have anyone experienced problems whit DCexport taking up a lot of cpu power?
Hi,
I came across tip for speeding up OpenLdap a while ago, I have never tested it as I have never found the need to but here it is :-
Stop the OpenLdap service
Open slapd.conf which is under SharedServices\openLDAP\
Locate
*# Indices to maintain*
index objectClass eq
index cn,ou,cssIdentity,member,cssRoleDN,cssProductCode,cssVersion eq
index cssDisplayNameDefault eq,sub
and add
index uniqueMember eq
Save/Close
run slapindex.exe -f c:\<location to slapd.conf>\slapd.conf
Start up OpenLdap service again.
Though this doesn't explain the reason why you are suddenly getting performance issues, do you have a large amount of native users/groups ?
If you are on 9.3.1 have you tried Sync Native Directory from Shared Services.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/
Similar Messages
-
Long running processes using a lot of CPU
Hi all,
We have a clustered environment and on both the DB nodes there are processes that is taking a lot of CPU and runs a really long time. The load of the servers get really high and performance degrades drastically.
I've traced the processes and the module is usually a combination of the following:
icx.por.rcv.server.ReceiveItemsAM
icx.por.reqmgmt.server.ReqMgmtAM
I know it has something to do with Purchase Orders.
Can someone please give me more info on this processes and what I can do about them?
Thanks in advance...Step by Step to fix your Mac
They will just say it's a software problem you need to fix most likely.
However if you have exhausted your software fixes and/or Hardware Test gives something, it could be a hardware problem, but likely it's software for what your mentioning. -
I have been a happy user of Firefox for many years. Around last April first I opened Firefox and was offered an update to v 4.42.0.0 which I accepted. Installation seemingly went well. I forget now exactly what happened but the result has been that ever since April 1 I haven’t been able to open the Firefox browser when clicking on the Firefox icon. My computer now was running very slowly. I tried to uninstall Firefox, but a popup told me I couldn’t because Firefox was in use. This confused me because I couldn’t see it being used. Only now I have found that on Task Manager processes that “firefox.exe” was consuming 99 % of the CPU. After removing firefox.exe by clicking End Process my computer ran better. I uninstalled Firefox I had on my computer and installed Firefox 5.0. Unfortunately I have the same problems: Firefox does not open when clicking on the icon, the firefox.exe process consumes 99 % of the CPU and my computer runs slowly.
Born2die! Brilliant. I am a desktop clicker and never knew Firefox had a safe mode.
Thank You!
I was unable to start in safe mode initially. The second time I disabled all of the Add-Ons and she started up just fine. I enabled them one by one hoping to track down the culprit but the problem seems to have gone away.
BTW I am running ver. 3.6.8 (in response to cor-el's earlier post) and
Firefox is in the process of downloading 3.6.10 (which I am starting to think may have been what caused this whole problem to begin with)
Incidentally, whats up with all of the Java Console Add Ons?
I have:
Java Console 6.0.11, Java Console 6.0.13, Java Console 6.0.15
Java Console 6.0.17, Java Console 6.0.20, and Java Console 6.0.21
What are they? Do I need them? Can I uninstall them? Is this due to using Open Office?
Also, .NET Framework 0.0.0 Should I uninstall it? -
The Firefox.exe process hogs 25% of my CPU resources even after I've closed it.
On a relatively consistent basis, when I close the Firefox windows I have open, the firefox.exe process doesn't end. When I go to open Firefox again later, I get the error message that I can't open Firefox because it's already running or not responding. When I look in Task Manager (on Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit, BTW), the firefox.exe process is holding steady at 25% CPU usage along with whatever memory usage it already had consumed, even though the Tasks tab doesn't list Firefox as being open.
== This happened ==
A few times a week
== I'm not exactly sure. It sort of just started on its own.Ed, this kind of issues are, unfortunately, more common and the we'd like. Thankfully, 99% of the cases are very easy to solve. However, you do need to diagnose what your exact problem is. Do this:
#run Firefox in [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode safe-mode] to disable all extensions, themes and plugins. If this fixes your issues, be them with RAM or CPU usage, then you know it's a problem with plugins, themes or extensions. Proceed to number 2. If safe-mode doesn't fix the issues, then read bellow, after this list;
#update all extensions, themes and plugins in your Firefox. If this doesn't solve the issues, proceed to the following number;
#disable all extensions, themes and plugins in your Firefox (not running safe-mode). Being certain that, as in safe-mode, the problems you're having have gone away, enable one plugin at a time. You should be certain that you WANT that plugin to be enabled, so keep your overall number of plugins as low as possible. When you encounter the problems, you know you've found a problematic plugin, so disable it for good. Keep enabling all plugins (except problematic ones) until you've gone through them all.
#enable one extension at a time. Again, be certain that you WANT that extension to be enabled, so keep your overall number of extensions as low as possible. Also, try the theme you want to have installed so see if that is what's causing the problem. When you encounter the problems, you know you've found a problematic extension/theme, so disable it for good. Keep enabling all your extensions (except problematic ones) until you've gone through them all;
#you're done! You've fixed your problems with problematic add-ons. If you want to keep using those problematic add-ons, please contant their author for support.
Ok, if disabling all extensions and plugins through safe-mode didn't work to bring Firefox's CPU and RAM usage to good levels, then you have different issue. The most likely scenario is that you have a third party software running on your computer that is messing with Firefox. Do as follows:
#try reinstalling Firefox. No data will be lost. You can get the latest version for free at [http://www.getfirefox.com/ getfirefox.com]. If that doesn't fix the problem, proceed;
#do a virus/malware check on your computer. If this doesn't fix it, proceed;
#disable all software running in the background that you don't want to have running in the background (in windows, this is done by pressing WINDOWS+R in your keyboard, typing "msconfig" (without the commas) and pressing enter. Now, under the "Startup" tab, you can uncheck the software you don't want, and reboot your system for changes to take effect. If you're unsure of what software you want running, ask someone with more experience). If this doesn't fix your issues with Firefox, proceed;
#check your firewall/antivirus/security suite for enabled functions/features that you don't want and/or may be conflicting with Firefox. You'll find that these features are most likely tied to Internet Security features, such as link scanners or URL checkers and the like. If you're not sure they are conflicting with Firefox, simply try to disable them to see whether or not that's true. As long as you don't browse the web with your antivirus completely off and your firewall completely turned off, there should be no problems. If this doesn't solve the issues, proceed to the following number;
#check your operating system security options, mainly advanced options that are not configured by default. While it's very unlikely that this may be the cause of the problem (after all, it's the last item on the list), it's remotely possible. If this doesn't work, proceed to the following point;
#update your modem/router software. There have been some reports that some modem/router software may cause Firefox and other browsers to loose performance and/or stability. If updating doesn't fix your issue, try other versions of the software, if possible. If you need support with this, contact your modem/router manufacturer. If this doesn't help, proceed;
#clean up your OS registry, using appropriate software. Make sure you've followed my instructions correctly, but if this all doesn't work, [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Managing+profiles create a new Firefox profile] (this can be temporary, of course) and see if the issues persist. Report here the results, so we can help you further. -
Installd daemon taking a lot of CPU
I was away from my system for a while and when I returned it was very busy. Apart from Parallels and some other programs there was this installd process that showed up in Activity Monitor. Now, I did not install anything. I quit the running programs, then it was still around. A ps -laxww provided this for installd:
0 59528 1 0 33 0 2607456 111000 - Ss ?? 1:30.63 /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/PackageKit.framework/Resources/installd
Why is that process taking cpu when I'm not installing anything?Hmm nevermind. It was probably some weird bug. iChat is back to normal here, and also normal at the other end of the chat. It was probably some weirdness with iChat's network (quite common these days!).
-
SLAPD.EXE taking a lot of CPU Time
Hi all,
I'm getting this stange issue on our Dev Boxes, when trying to launch a business rule, a process called slapd.exe (Open Ldap) takes up to 50 / 60 % of CPU time and it takes about 1 to 2 min for the prompts on the business rules to appear.
The system just seems to hang ...
Please let me know if you know how to resolve this,
Cheers,
JeremieHi,
I came across tip for speeding up OpenLdap a while ago, I have never tested it as I have never found the need to but here it is :-
Stop the OpenLdap service
Open slapd.conf which is under SharedServices\openLDAP\
Locate
*# Indices to maintain*
index objectClass eq
index cn,ou,cssIdentity,member,cssRoleDN,cssProductCode,cssVersion eq
index cssDisplayNameDefault eq,sub
and add
index uniqueMember eq
Save/Close
run slapindex.exe -f c:\<location to slapd.conf>\slapd.conf
Start up OpenLdap service again.
Though this doesn't explain the reason why you are suddenly getting performance issues, do you have a large amount of native users/groups ?
If you are on 9.3.1 have you tried Sync Native Directory from Shared Services.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
Advanced queue taking a lot of CPU time
hi ,
My application has a workflow which dequeues messages from an advanced queue.The message is simple text message. But i am facing CPU time problems. when the workflow( one of the steps is to dequeue) runs it uses 100% of a particular CPU.
can somebody throw some light on the things to implement to reduce CPU time and why i am having this problem.
also , i am using the TOP command on UNIX to trace the process.Does it give us the correct CPU usage measure?suggest some more specific measures , if any.
Thanks in AdvanceHi,
I came across tip for speeding up OpenLdap a while ago, I have never tested it as I have never found the need to but here it is :-
Stop the OpenLdap service
Open slapd.conf which is under SharedServices\openLDAP\
Locate
*# Indices to maintain*
index objectClass eq
index cn,ou,cssIdentity,member,cssRoleDN,cssProductCode,cssVersion eq
index cssDisplayNameDefault eq,sub
and add
index uniqueMember eq
Save/Close
run slapindex.exe -f c:\<location to slapd.conf>\slapd.conf
Start up OpenLdap service again.
Though this doesn't explain the reason why you are suddenly getting performance issues, do you have a large amount of native users/groups ?
If you are on 9.3.1 have you tried Sync Native Directory from Shared Services.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
Sockd process uses a lot of CPU time
Hi,
I'm running the Sun Java System Web Proxy Server version 4.02 on a SunFire V210 dual processor box running Solaris 10 with the default socks5.conf for testing.
Just browsing a few web pages in Firefox or IE using the socks proxy boosts CPU usage from the sockd process to a staggering 50% and stay there for several minutes.
Comparing with the old NEC reference Socks5 daemon the Sun version is really performing badly.
The system is pretty standard though I have tuned /etc/system and the tcp stack using recommendations in the proxy administration manual. All Solaris 10 patches are installed.
prstat output:
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
24519 proxy 6664K 4384K cpu1 0 10 0:11:18 50% sockd/43Any ideas what's wrong or do I have to stick with the old NEC reference daemon?
Regards
Kasper L�vschallUsing:
truss -dlfo truss.out ./sockd-wdog
Where things begin to happen:
5259/1: 11.2858 lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) Err#62 ETIME
5259/1: 12.2958 lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) Err#62 ETIME
5259/1: 13.3058 lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) Err#62 ETIME
5259/1: 14.3158 lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) Err#62 ETIME
5259/2: 15.1858 pollsys(0xFEAEFDC8, 1, 0xFEAEFD58, 0x00000000) = 0
5259/1: 15.3258 lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) Err#62 ETIME
5259/2: pollsys(0xFEAEFDC8, 1, 0xFEAEFD58, 0x00000000) (sleeping...)
5259/1: lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) (sleeping...)
5259/1: 16.3359 lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) Err#62 ETIME
5259/1: lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) (sleeping...)
5259/1: 17.3459 lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0) Err#62 ETIME
5259/2: 18.2382 pollsys(0xFEAEFDC8, 1, 0xFEAEFD58, 0x00000000) = 1
5259/2: 18.2385 accept(3, 0xFEAEFEC8, 0xFEAEFE64, SOV_DEFAULT) = 5
5259/2: 18.2386 lwp_unpark(43) = 0
5259/43: 18.2386 lwp_park(0x00000000, 0) = 0
5259/2: 18.2388 accept(3, 0xFEAEFEC8, 0xFEAEFE64, SOV_DEFAULT) Err#11 EAGAIN
5259/43: 18.2389 getsockname(5, 0xFE5AFEA8, 0xFE5AFDA4, SOV_DEFAULT) = 0
5259/43: 18.2391 getpeername(5, 0xFE5AFE38, 0xFE5AFDA4, SOV_DEFAULT) = 0
5259/43: 18.2391 read(5, 0x00063B7E, 1) Err#11 EAGAIN
5259/43: 18.2407 pollsys(0xFE5AFD08, 1, 0xFE5AFCA0, 0x00000000) = 1
5259/43: 18.2408 read(5, "04", 1) = 1
5259/43: 18.2409 read(5, "01\0 P BF9 ] c", 7) = 7
5259/43: 18.2411 read(5, " k l\0", 255) = 3
5259/43: 18.2412 write(4, " [ 0 1 / M a r / 2 0 0 6".., 88) = 88
5259/43: 18.2413 so_socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP, "", SOV_DEFAULT) = 6
5259/43: 18.2414 fcntl(6, F_GETFL) = 2
5259/43: 18.2415 fcntl(6, F_SETFL, FWRITE|FNONBLOCK) = 0
5259/43: 18.2416 bind(6, 0xFE5AF980, 16, SOV_SOCKBSD) = 0
5259/43: 18.2418 connect(6, 0xFE5AF910, 16, SOV_DEFAULT) Err#150 EINPROGRESS
5259/43: 18.2970 pollsys(0xFE5AF798, 1, 0xFE5AF730, 0x00000000) = 1
5259/43: 18.2971 getsockopt(6, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR, 0xFE5AF6D0, 0xFE5AF6D4, SOV_DEFAULT) = 0
5259/43: 18.2972 getsockname(6, 0xFE5AF980, 0xFE5AF8A4, SOV_DEFAULT) = 0
5259/43: 18.2973 write(5, "\0 Z918782E1 511", 8) = 8
5259/43: 18.2974 lwp_unpark(3) = 0
5259/3: 18.2974 lwp_park(0x00000000, 0) = 0
5259/3: 18.2977 brk(0x00064850) = 0
5259/3: 18.2977 brk(0x00078850) = 0
5259/3: 18.2981 pollsys(0xFEACF458, 50, 0xFEACF3E8, 0x00000000) = 0
5259/3: 18.2982 pollsys(0xFEACF458, 50, 0xFEACF3E8, 0x00000000) = 0
5259/3: 18.2983 pollsys(0xFEACF458, 50, 0xFEACF3E8, 0x00000000) = 0Then loades of pollsys(0xFEACF458, 50, 0xFEACF3E8, 0x00000000) = 0 until I kill the daemon - seems like they are killing the server?
Thanks,
Kasper -
Mds Process takes a lot of CPU and TimeMachine is blocked
I have TimeMachine activated on an external HD. Everything works fine and some other external HDs are backup with TimeMachine to the TimeMachine Drive. When I now activate SpotLight for my internal Macintosh HD the TimePachine Process stops and is never going on. When I kill the mds process TimeMachine is going on with backUp. Next try from TimeMachine and I have same problem again.
When I move Macintosh HD to private area from Spotlight TimeMachine is working fine. Now I can't search in Mail, Macintosh HD and some more unfunny things. It would be great when everything works fine again.
I was checking the access right and everything was fixed or there was nothing to fix. I checked the Macintosh HD by using the Recovery Partition and everything is fine.
When I now remove the Macintosh HD again from the privat area of spotlight mrs will take very fast 200% CPU on my iMac and next TimeMachine Process ist blocked again.
It is not a question of time. I ran mrs now for 7 days and it takes always 100-200% CPU in top and I stopped TimeMachine during this time. My Macintosh HD has 500GB and the TimeMachine HD 2TB and it has 1TB free space.
I stopped TimeMachine, initialized the HD, reactivated TimeMachine and everything was archived as long as I had Macintosh HD in privat area of Spotlight.
At the moment I don't have any idea what I can do. Is there any possibility to see what mrs is doing when it takes so much CPU which folder or file the process trys to process?
So what can I do?Problem solved...
I found a folder I deleted and problem was solved. -
Spotlight endlessly indexing and mdworker process using lot of cpu
Hi, I just did Archive&Install from Tiger to Leopard, applied 10.5.1 and now...
...since THREE DAYS Spotlight is indexing giving strange values for time remaining (2.134.545.673 hours).
Like I found in other threads, I have the mdworked process absorbing a lot of cpu power and, from Console, maybe it's crashing repeatedly. I made private of lots of folders but the problem is still there.
Any other idea?
How can I find which file/application is freezing mdworker and making Spotlight so unuseful?
Thanks in advance
TampanoI don't know. How much data is on your HD? Simplest thing to do is use the Terminal command mdutil to erase the current indexes and rebuild them. This should do it:
*sudo mdutil -E /Volumes/(asterisk)*
Launch the Terminal.app in /Applications/Utilities/, copy & paste that command into the window, hit the return key, enter your admin password at the Password: prompt (carefully because nothing shows up on the screen), and hit the return key again. That should erase the indexes and rebuild them. -
Syncserver.exe taking large amount of CPU process after iTunes closing
Hi,
OS system : Win 8.1 64 bit
itune release : 12.0.1.26
Antivirus software : Kaspersky internet security 2015 release: 15.01.415 (b)
After iTunes closing the syncserver.exe process will take a large amount of CPU Process.
The problem has begins after KIS 2015 installation.
I tried to apply a procedure finded on another forum : Windows 7 compatibility mode and run as administrator for distnoted.exe and syncserver.exe. The problem remaind.
Thank for your helpHello~ Chrisrob94
My computer environment is
OS: Win 8.1 x64
Itunes: 12.0.1.26
Anti-Virus: KIS2015 15.00.463(b)
I has same your problem too. But I solved in the following way;
File Path1: C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Apple\Apple Application Support\distnoted.exe
File Path2: C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Apple\Mobile Device Support\SyncServer.exe
this file [Right Click] and Properties. on the compatibility tab(click change setting for all users);;;
then check run this program in compatibility mode for: and select windows 7.
also check run this program as an administrator. click apply then ok
if already running syncserver, disnoted kill it. using windows task manager.
This seemed to fix the problem for me....Good luck to you! -
Java threads and WinLogon processes taking CPU!
We are seeing a strange problem. We have a multi-threaded java application
that is deployed on a Microsoft Windows 2000 server (SP4) with Citrix
Metaframe XP (Feature release 2). When this application starts, we start to see
multiple WINLOGON.EXE processes (20 plus) each taking up 1-2% of CPU -
this raises the CPU usage on the server significantly, impacting performance.
We have tested with JDK 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 and see the same issues. If we
run the java application in a single thread, we dont see the same issue.
Has any one seen this problem before? Any suggestion on how this can be resolved?
Thanks in advance!Thanks for your replies. This is a Citrix environment where there are 50 plus
users logged in and there are 50 plus instances of Winlogon.exe always
running. Most of the time the cpu usage of these processes is 0.
We tried a multi-threaded program that lists files in a directory every few
seconds. There are 40 plus servers in the farm that we are deploying this
application on. We are seeing this problem on only some of the servers.
If we run a single thread from main(), we dont see the issue. But if we spawn
10 threads doing the scans periodically, we notice that as soon as all the threads
start, the WinLogons appear to start to take up CPU. When we stop the java
program, the WinLogon processes drop in CPU usage.
Is it possible that Java and WinLogon share some dlls that could be triggering
the WinLogon processes off?
We have tried running the single thread and multi-threaded programs around
same time and the correlation with the winlogons is clearly visible. If we add
sleep() soon after we start a thread, the winlogons seem to kick in later. -
Opening the utility "activity monitor", I see a process that appears and disappears, called 3265 "du" process. It occupies a lot of CPU % system (the red one in the mac activity monitor utility). Anyone knows what's that and how can I remove it?
Probably the same issue of this discussion: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1968751?start=0&tstart=0
But no idea about how to solve it!BSD General Commands Manual
du -- display disk usage statistics
The du utility displays the file system block usage for each file argu-
ment and for each directory in the file hierarchy rooted in each direc-
tory argument. If no file is specified, the block usage of the hierarchy
rooted in the current directory is displayed.
To see for yourself use Terminal program enter: man du
press enter (to see the manual for "du") -
After an attempt to close the Mozilla Firefox page, on every occasion, the firefox.exe process is found at the top of the list when ordering the listed 'processes' by CPU time... even though the web page is gone.
If an attempt is made to restart Mozilla, the system declares that the current Mozilla process should be closed.
If the firefox.exe process is explicitly closed in the Task Manager, only then can Firefox be restarted.Does that also happen if you use File > Exit Firefox?
See also "Hang at exit":
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_hangs
* [[Firefox hangs]] -
Opening activity monitor, I see a process that appears and disappears, called 3265 "du" process. It ***** a lot of CPU % system (the red one in the mac activity monitor utility). Anyone knows what's that and how can I remove it?
probably it's the same issue of this discussion : https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1968751?start=0&tstart=0BSD General Commands Manual
du -- display disk usage statistics
The du utility displays the file system block usage for each file argu-
ment and for each directory in the file hierarchy rooted in each direc-
tory argument. If no file is specified, the block usage of the hierarchy
rooted in the current directory is displayed.
To see for yourself use Terminal program enter: man du
press enter (to see the manual for "du")
Maybe you are looking for
-
My iphone 4 started making a sound like a "boing" with a vibration/ wobbly sound. It does this at least once a day. It started about a month ago. Anyone got any ideas?
-
I am trying to read TDMS files directly into Matlab using the NI nilibddc.dll. I have read most of the posts on here but still have a problem... Within Matlab I can open and read a file and get the data but I cant find anything that tells me what th
-
Function Modules, for listing Cost centers Under a manager
Hi All, 1. Can any one please suggest me any Function Module available for listing the cost center under a manager, given only the Manager's username or pernr. 2. And also the Function Group which has the collection of Function Modules which deals wi
-
Hi all, I have just bought a second hand Mac mini 2004 and was working have taken a copy of the internal hard drive through disk utility, but it went to blue screen and couldn't restart it back up so switched it off and now it doesn't start just stay
-
How to edit/modify workflow task after it has been completed?
My workflow spawns a couple tasks and once those tasks are completed, they become non-modifiable. If the user made a mistake by entering wrong details while completing the task and would like to change it later, he cannot do so once he hits the compl