DCexport.exe process taking a lot of cpu's power

Hi everyone!
Does anyone know where DCexport.exe comes from? I believe its used by dynamic converter is this right?
we use dynamic converter to get the html conversion from word documents to present the results on our intranet solution.
have anyone experienced problems whit DCexport taking up a lot of cpu power?

Hi,
I came across tip for speeding up OpenLdap a while ago, I have never tested it as I have never found the need to but here it is :-
Stop the OpenLdap service
Open slapd.conf which is under SharedServices\openLDAP\
Locate
*# Indices to maintain*
index objectClass eq
index cn,ou,cssIdentity,member,cssRoleDN,cssProductCode,cssVersion eq
index cssDisplayNameDefault eq,sub
and add
index uniqueMember eq
Save/Close
run slapindex.exe -f c:\<location to slapd.conf>\slapd.conf
Start up OpenLdap service again.
Though this doesn't explain the reason why you are suddenly getting performance issues, do you have a large amount of native users/groups ?
If you are on 9.3.1 have you tried Sync Native Directory from Shared Services.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Similar Messages

  • Long running processes using a lot of CPU

    Hi all,
    We have a clustered environment and on both the DB nodes there are processes that is taking a lot of CPU and runs a really long time. The load of the servers get really high and performance degrades drastically.
    I've traced the processes and the module is usually a combination of the following:
    icx.por.rcv.server.ReceiveItemsAM
    icx.por.reqmgmt.server.ReqMgmtAM
    I know it has something to do with Purchase Orders.
    Can someone please give me more info on this processes and what I can do about them?
    Thanks in advance.

    ..Step by Step to fix your Mac
    They will just say it's a software problem you need to fix most likely.
    However if you have exhausted your software fixes and/or Hardware Test gives something, it could be a hardware problem, but likely it's software for what your mentioning.

  • Firefox does not open when clicking on the icon, the firefox.exe process consumes 99 % of the CPU and my computer runs slowly.

    I have been a happy user of Firefox for many years. Around last April first I opened Firefox and was offered an update to v 4.42.0.0 which I accepted. Installation seemingly went well. I forget now exactly what happened but the result has been that ever since April 1 I haven’t been able to open the Firefox browser when clicking on the Firefox icon. My computer now was running very slowly. I tried to uninstall Firefox, but a popup told me I couldn’t because Firefox was in use. This confused me because I couldn’t see it being used. Only now I have found that on Task Manager processes that “firefox.exe” was consuming 99 % of the CPU. After removing firefox.exe by clicking End Process my computer ran better. I uninstalled Firefox I had on my computer and installed Firefox 5.0. Unfortunately I have the same problems: Firefox does not open when clicking on the icon, the firefox.exe process consumes 99 % of the CPU and my computer runs slowly.

    Born2die! Brilliant. I am a desktop clicker and never knew Firefox had a safe mode.
    Thank You!
    I was unable to start in safe mode initially. The second time I disabled all of the Add-Ons and she started up just fine. I enabled them one by one hoping to track down the culprit but the problem seems to have gone away.
    BTW I am running ver. 3.6.8 (in response to cor-el's earlier post) and
    Firefox is in the process of downloading 3.6.10 (which I am starting to think may have been what caused this whole problem to begin with)
    Incidentally, whats up with all of the Java Console Add Ons?
    I have:
    Java Console 6.0.11, Java Console 6.0.13, Java Console 6.0.15
    Java Console 6.0.17, Java Console 6.0.20, and Java Console 6.0.21
    What are they? Do I need them? Can I uninstall them? Is this due to using Open Office?
    Also, .NET Framework 0.0.0 Should I uninstall it?

  • The Firefox.exe process hogs 25% of my CPU resources even after I've closed it.

    On a relatively consistent basis, when I close the Firefox windows I have open, the firefox.exe process doesn't end. When I go to open Firefox again later, I get the error message that I can't open Firefox because it's already running or not responding. When I look in Task Manager (on Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit, BTW), the firefox.exe process is holding steady at 25% CPU usage along with whatever memory usage it already had consumed, even though the Tasks tab doesn't list Firefox as being open.
    == This happened ==
    A few times a week
    == I'm not exactly sure. It sort of just started on its own.

    Ed, this kind of issues are, unfortunately, more common and the we'd like. Thankfully, 99% of the cases are very easy to solve. However, you do need to diagnose what your exact problem is. Do this:
    #run Firefox in [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Safe+Mode safe-mode] to disable all extensions, themes and plugins. If this fixes your issues, be them with RAM or CPU usage, then you know it's a problem with plugins, themes or extensions. Proceed to number 2. If safe-mode doesn't fix the issues, then read bellow, after this list;
    #update all extensions, themes and plugins in your Firefox. If this doesn't solve the issues, proceed to the following number;
    #disable all extensions, themes and plugins in your Firefox (not running safe-mode). Being certain that, as in safe-mode, the problems you're having have gone away, enable one plugin at a time. You should be certain that you WANT that plugin to be enabled, so keep your overall number of plugins as low as possible. When you encounter the problems, you know you've found a problematic plugin, so disable it for good. Keep enabling all plugins (except problematic ones) until you've gone through them all.
    #enable one extension at a time. Again, be certain that you WANT that extension to be enabled, so keep your overall number of extensions as low as possible. Also, try the theme you want to have installed so see if that is what's causing the problem. When you encounter the problems, you know you've found a problematic extension/theme, so disable it for good. Keep enabling all your extensions (except problematic ones) until you've gone through them all;
    #you're done! You've fixed your problems with problematic add-ons. If you want to keep using those problematic add-ons, please contant their author for support.
    Ok, if disabling all extensions and plugins through safe-mode didn't work to bring Firefox's CPU and RAM usage to good levels, then you have different issue. The most likely scenario is that you have a third party software running on your computer that is messing with Firefox. Do as follows:
    #try reinstalling Firefox. No data will be lost. You can get the latest version for free at [http://www.getfirefox.com/ getfirefox.com]. If that doesn't fix the problem, proceed;
    #do a virus/malware check on your computer. If this doesn't fix it, proceed;
    #disable all software running in the background that you don't want to have running in the background (in windows, this is done by pressing WINDOWS+R in your keyboard, typing "msconfig" (without the commas) and pressing enter. Now, under the "Startup" tab, you can uncheck the software you don't want, and reboot your system for changes to take effect. If you're unsure of what software you want running, ask someone with more experience). If this doesn't fix your issues with Firefox, proceed;
    #check your firewall/antivirus/security suite for enabled functions/features that you don't want and/or may be conflicting with Firefox. You'll find that these features are most likely tied to Internet Security features, such as link scanners or URL checkers and the like. If you're not sure they are conflicting with Firefox, simply try to disable them to see whether or not that's true. As long as you don't browse the web with your antivirus completely off and your firewall completely turned off, there should be no problems. If this doesn't solve the issues, proceed to the following number;
    #check your operating system security options, mainly advanced options that are not configured by default. While it's very unlikely that this may be the cause of the problem (after all, it's the last item on the list), it's remotely possible. If this doesn't work, proceed to the following point;
    #update your modem/router software. There have been some reports that some modem/router software may cause Firefox and other browsers to loose performance and/or stability. If updating doesn't fix your issue, try other versions of the software, if possible. If you need support with this, contact your modem/router manufacturer. If this doesn't help, proceed;
    #clean up your OS registry, using appropriate software. Make sure you've followed my instructions correctly, but if this all doesn't work, [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Managing+profiles create a new Firefox profile] (this can be temporary, of course) and see if the issues persist. Report here the results, so we can help you further.

  • Installd daemon taking a lot of CPU

    I was away from my system for a while and when I returned it was very busy. Apart from Parallels and some other programs there was this installd process that showed up in Activity Monitor. Now, I did not install anything. I quit the running programs, then it was still around. A ps -laxww provided this for installd:
        0 59528     1   0  33  0  2607456 111000 -      Ss     ??    1:30.63 /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/PackageKit.framework/Resources/installd
    Why is that process taking cpu when I'm not installing anything?

    Hmm nevermind. It was probably some weird bug. iChat is back to normal here, and also normal at the other end of the chat. It was probably some weirdness with iChat's network (quite common these days!).

  • SLAPD.EXE taking a lot of CPU Time

    Hi all,
    I'm getting this stange issue on our Dev Boxes, when trying to launch a business rule, a process called slapd.exe (Open Ldap) takes up to 50 / 60 % of CPU time and it takes about 1 to 2 min for the prompts on the business rules to appear.
    The system just seems to hang ...
    Please let me know if you know how to resolve this,
    Cheers,
    Jeremie

    Hi,
    I came across tip for speeding up OpenLdap a while ago, I have never tested it as I have never found the need to but here it is :-
    Stop the OpenLdap service
    Open slapd.conf which is under SharedServices\openLDAP\
    Locate
    *# Indices to maintain*
    index objectClass eq
    index cn,ou,cssIdentity,member,cssRoleDN,cssProductCode,cssVersion eq
    index cssDisplayNameDefault eq,sub
    and add
    index uniqueMember eq
    Save/Close
    run slapindex.exe -f c:\<location to slapd.conf>\slapd.conf
    Start up OpenLdap service again.
    Though this doesn't explain the reason why you are suddenly getting performance issues, do you have a large amount of native users/groups ?
    If you are on 9.3.1 have you tried Sync Native Directory from Shared Services.
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Advanced queue taking a lot of CPU time

    hi ,
    My application has a workflow which dequeues messages from an advanced queue.The message is simple text message. But i am facing CPU time problems. when the workflow( one of the steps is to dequeue) runs it uses 100% of a particular CPU.
    can somebody throw some light on the things to implement to reduce CPU time and why i am having this problem.
    also , i am using the TOP command on UNIX to trace the process.Does it give us the correct CPU usage measure?suggest some more specific measures , if any.
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    I came across tip for speeding up OpenLdap a while ago, I have never tested it as I have never found the need to but here it is :-
    Stop the OpenLdap service
    Open slapd.conf which is under SharedServices\openLDAP\
    Locate
    *# Indices to maintain*
    index objectClass eq
    index cn,ou,cssIdentity,member,cssRoleDN,cssProductCode,cssVersion eq
    index cssDisplayNameDefault eq,sub
    and add
    index uniqueMember eq
    Save/Close
    run slapindex.exe -f c:\<location to slapd.conf>\slapd.conf
    Start up OpenLdap service again.
    Though this doesn't explain the reason why you are suddenly getting performance issues, do you have a large amount of native users/groups ?
    If you are on 9.3.1 have you tried Sync Native Directory from Shared Services.
    Cheers
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Sockd process uses a lot of CPU time

    Hi,
    I'm running the Sun Java System Web Proxy Server version 4.02 on a SunFire V210 dual processor box running Solaris 10 with the default socks5.conf for testing.
    Just browsing a few web pages in Firefox or IE using the socks proxy boosts CPU usage from the sockd process to a staggering 50% and stay there for several minutes.
    Comparing with the old NEC reference Socks5 daemon the Sun version is really performing badly.
    The system is pretty standard though I have tuned /etc/system and the tcp stack using recommendations in the proxy administration manual. All Solaris 10 patches are installed.
    prstat output:
       PID USERNAME  SIZE   RSS STATE  PRI NICE      TIME  CPU PROCESS/NLWP
    24519 proxy    6664K 4384K cpu1     0   10   0:11:18  50% sockd/43Any ideas what's wrong or do I have to stick with the old NEC reference daemon?
    Regards
    Kasper L�vschall

    Using:
    truss -dlfo truss.out ./sockd-wdog
    Where things begin to happen:
    5259/1:          11.2858     lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)                    Err#62 ETIME
    5259/1:          12.2958     lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)                    Err#62 ETIME
    5259/1:          13.3058     lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)                    Err#62 ETIME
    5259/1:          14.3158     lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)                    Err#62 ETIME
    5259/2:          15.1858     pollsys(0xFEAEFDC8, 1, 0xFEAEFD58, 0x00000000)     = 0
    5259/1:          15.3258     lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)                    Err#62 ETIME
    5259/2:          pollsys(0xFEAEFDC8, 1, 0xFEAEFD58, 0x00000000) (sleeping...)
    5259/1:          lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)          (sleeping...)
    5259/1:          16.3359     lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)                    Err#62 ETIME
    5259/1:          lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)          (sleeping...)
    5259/1:          17.3459     lwp_park(0xFFBFF290, 0)                    Err#62 ETIME
    5259/2:          18.2382     pollsys(0xFEAEFDC8, 1, 0xFEAEFD58, 0x00000000)     = 1
    5259/2:          18.2385     accept(3, 0xFEAEFEC8, 0xFEAEFE64, SOV_DEFAULT)     = 5
    5259/2:          18.2386     lwp_unpark(43)                         = 0
    5259/43:     18.2386     lwp_park(0x00000000, 0)                    = 0
    5259/2:          18.2388     accept(3, 0xFEAEFEC8, 0xFEAEFE64, SOV_DEFAULT)     Err#11 EAGAIN
    5259/43:     18.2389     getsockname(5, 0xFE5AFEA8, 0xFE5AFDA4, SOV_DEFAULT) = 0
    5259/43:     18.2391     getpeername(5, 0xFE5AFE38, 0xFE5AFDA4, SOV_DEFAULT) = 0
    5259/43:     18.2391     read(5, 0x00063B7E, 1)                    Err#11 EAGAIN
    5259/43:     18.2407     pollsys(0xFE5AFD08, 1, 0xFE5AFCA0, 0x00000000)     = 1
    5259/43:     18.2408     read(5, "04", 1)                    = 1
    5259/43:     18.2409     read(5, "01\0 P BF9 ] c", 7)               = 7
    5259/43:     18.2411     read(5, " k l\0", 255)                    = 3
    5259/43:     18.2412     write(4, " [ 0 1 / M a r / 2 0 0 6".., 88)     = 88
    5259/43:     18.2413     so_socket(PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_IP, "", SOV_DEFAULT) = 6
    5259/43:     18.2414     fcntl(6, F_GETFL)                    = 2
    5259/43:     18.2415     fcntl(6, F_SETFL, FWRITE|FNONBLOCK)          = 0
    5259/43:     18.2416     bind(6, 0xFE5AF980, 16, SOV_SOCKBSD)          = 0
    5259/43:     18.2418     connect(6, 0xFE5AF910, 16, SOV_DEFAULT)          Err#150 EINPROGRESS
    5259/43:     18.2970     pollsys(0xFE5AF798, 1, 0xFE5AF730, 0x00000000)     = 1
    5259/43:     18.2971     getsockopt(6, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ERROR, 0xFE5AF6D0, 0xFE5AF6D4, SOV_DEFAULT) = 0
    5259/43:     18.2972     getsockname(6, 0xFE5AF980, 0xFE5AF8A4, SOV_DEFAULT) = 0
    5259/43:     18.2973     write(5, "\0 Z918782E1 511", 8)               = 8
    5259/43:     18.2974     lwp_unpark(3)                         = 0
    5259/3:          18.2974     lwp_park(0x00000000, 0)                    = 0
    5259/3:          18.2977     brk(0x00064850)                         = 0
    5259/3:          18.2977     brk(0x00078850)                         = 0
    5259/3:          18.2981     pollsys(0xFEACF458, 50, 0xFEACF3E8, 0x00000000)     = 0
    5259/3:          18.2982     pollsys(0xFEACF458, 50, 0xFEACF3E8, 0x00000000)     = 0
    5259/3:          18.2983     pollsys(0xFEACF458, 50, 0xFEACF3E8, 0x00000000)     = 0Then loades of pollsys(0xFEACF458, 50, 0xFEACF3E8, 0x00000000)     = 0 until I kill the daemon - seems like they are killing the server?
    Thanks,
    Kasper

  • Mds Process takes a lot of CPU and TimeMachine is blocked

    I have TimeMachine activated on an external HD. Everything works fine and some other external HDs are backup with TimeMachine to the TimeMachine Drive. When I now activate SpotLight for my internal Macintosh HD the TimePachine Process stops and is never going on. When I kill the mds process TimeMachine is going on with backUp. Next try from TimeMachine and I have same problem again.
    When I move Macintosh HD to private area from Spotlight TimeMachine is working fine. Now I can't search in Mail, Macintosh HD and some more unfunny things. It would be great when everything works fine again.
    I was checking the access right and everything was fixed or there was nothing to fix. I checked the Macintosh HD by using the Recovery Partition and everything is fine.
    When I now remove the Macintosh HD again from the privat area of spotlight mrs will take very fast 200% CPU on my iMac and next TimeMachine Process ist blocked again.
    It is not a question of time. I ran mrs now for 7 days and it takes always 100-200% CPU in top and I stopped TimeMachine during this time. My Macintosh HD has 500GB and the TimeMachine HD 2TB and it has 1TB free space.
    I stopped TimeMachine, initialized the HD, reactivated TimeMachine and everything was archived as long as I had Macintosh HD in privat area of Spotlight.
    At the moment I don't have any idea what I can do. Is there any possibility to see what mrs is doing when it takes so much CPU which folder or file the process trys to process?
    So what can I do?

    Problem solved...
    I found a folder I deleted and problem was solved.

  • Spotlight endlessly indexing and mdworker process using lot of cpu

    Hi, I just did Archive&Install from Tiger to Leopard, applied 10.5.1 and now...
    ...since THREE DAYS Spotlight is indexing giving strange values for time remaining (2.134.545.673 hours).
    Like I found in other threads, I have the mdworked process absorbing a lot of cpu power and, from Console, maybe it's crashing repeatedly. I made private of lots of folders but the problem is still there.
    Any other idea?
    How can I find which file/application is freezing mdworker and making Spotlight so unuseful?
    Thanks in advance
    Tampano

    I don't know. How much data is on your HD? Simplest thing to do is use the Terminal command mdutil to erase the current indexes and rebuild them. This should do it:
    *sudo mdutil -E /Volumes/(asterisk)*
    Launch the Terminal.app in /Applications/Utilities/, copy & paste that command into the window, hit the return key, enter your admin password at the Password: prompt (carefully because nothing shows up on the screen), and hit the return key again. That should erase the indexes and rebuild them.

  • Syncserver.exe taking large amount of CPU process after iTunes closing

    Hi,
    OS system : Win 8.1 64 bit
    itune release : 12.0.1.26
    Antivirus software : Kaspersky internet security 2015     release: 15.01.415 (b)
    After iTunes closing the syncserver.exe process will take a large amount of CPU Process.
    The problem has begins after KIS 2015 installation.
    I tried to apply a procedure finded on another forum : Windows 7 compatibility mode and run as administrator for distnoted.exe and syncserver.exe. The problem remaind.
    Thank for your help

    Hello~ Chrisrob94
    My computer environment is
    OS: Win 8.1 x64
    Itunes: 12.0.1.26
    Anti-Virus: KIS2015 15.00.463(b)
    I has same your problem too. But I solved in the following way;
    File Path1:  C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Apple\Apple Application Support\distnoted.exe
    File Path2:  C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Apple\Mobile Device Support\SyncServer.exe
    this file [Right Click] and Properties. on the compatibility tab(click change setting for all users);;;
    then check run this program in compatibility mode for: and select windows 7.
    also check run this program as an administrator. click apply then ok
    if already running syncserver, disnoted kill it. using windows task manager.
    This seemed to fix the problem for me....Good luck to you!

  • Java threads and WinLogon processes taking CPU!

    We are seeing a strange problem. We have a multi-threaded java application
    that is deployed on a Microsoft Windows 2000 server (SP4) with Citrix
    Metaframe XP (Feature release 2). When this application starts, we start to see
    multiple WINLOGON.EXE processes (20 plus) each taking up 1-2% of CPU -
    this raises the CPU usage on the server significantly, impacting performance.
    We have tested with JDK 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 and see the same issues. If we
    run the java application in a single thread, we dont see the same issue.
    Has any one seen this problem before? Any suggestion on how this can be resolved?
    Thanks in advance!

    Thanks for your replies. This is a Citrix environment where there are 50 plus
    users logged in and there are 50 plus instances of Winlogon.exe always
    running. Most of the time the cpu usage of these processes is 0.
    We tried a multi-threaded program that lists files in a directory every few
    seconds. There are 40 plus servers in the farm that we are deploying this
    application on. We are seeing this problem on only some of the servers.
    If we run a single thread from main(), we dont see the issue. But if we spawn
    10 threads doing the scans periodically, we notice that as soon as all the threads
    start, the WinLogons appear to start to take up CPU. When we stop the java
    program, the WinLogon processes drop in CPU usage.
    Is it possible that Java and WinLogon share some dlls that could be triggering
    the WinLogon processes off?
    We have tried running the single thread and multi-threaded programs around
    same time and the correlation with the winlogons is clearly visible. If we add
    sleep() soon after we start a thread, the winlogons seem to kick in later.

  • "3265 du process" appears and disappears and occupies a lot of CPU System usage: what is that and how to remove that unknown process

    Opening the utility "activity monitor", I see a process that appears and disappears,  called 3265 "du" process. It occupies a lot of CPU % system (the red one in  the mac activity monitor utility). Anyone knows what's that and how can  I remove it?
    Probably the same issue of this discussion: https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1968751?start=0&tstart=0
    But no idea about how to solve it!

    BSD General Commands Manual
    du -- display disk usage statistics
    The du utility displays the file system block usage for each file argu-
         ment and for each directory in the file hierarchy rooted in each direc-
         tory argument.  If no file is specified, the block usage of the hierarchy
         rooted in the current directory is displayed.
    To see for yourself use Terminal program enter: man du
    press enter (to see the manual for "du")

  • When closing Firefox (v:3.6.13), using the red "close" button, the firefox.exe process remaines at top of the "Windows Task Manager" window and continues to use the majority of CPU time.

    After an attempt to close the Mozilla Firefox page, on every occasion, the firefox.exe process is found at the top of the list when ordering the listed 'processes' by CPU time... even though the web page is gone.
    If an attempt is made to restart Mozilla, the system declares that the current Mozilla process should be closed.
    If the firefox.exe process is explicitly closed in the Task Manager, only then can Firefox be restarted.

    Does that also happen if you use File > Exit Firefox?
    See also "Hang at exit":
    * http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_hangs
    * [[Firefox hangs]]

  • "3265 du process" appears and disappears and ***** a lot of CPU System usage: what is that?

    Opening activity monitor, I see a process that appears and disappears, called 3265 "du" process. It ***** a lot of CPU % system (the red one in the mac activity monitor utility). Anyone knows what's that and how can I remove it?
    probably it's the same issue of this discussion : https://discussions.apple.com/thread/1968751?start=0&tstart=0

    BSD General Commands Manual
    du -- display disk usage statistics
    The du utility displays the file system block usage for each file argu-
         ment and for each directory in the file hierarchy rooted in each direc-
         tory argument.  If no file is specified, the block usage of the hierarchy
         rooted in the current directory is displayed.
    To see for yourself use Terminal program enter: man du
    press enter (to see the manual for "du")

Maybe you are looking for