DDR 500 Doubt

Hie all , who own the DDR 500 can post your experience here please .
1) if DDR 500 use, what will be the default frequency of the RAM ?
2) what is the default value for FSB : DRAM ?
3) if DDR 500 run @ 200Mhz, will the FSB : DRAM = 1 : 1 ?
4) what brand of DDR 500 ram can run @ CL 2 ?
5) if yes , what is the timing for the ( Question 4 ) ram ?
6) is DDR 400 @ CL 2 is faster than DDR 500 @ CL 3 ?
7) is the memory timing important ?
as i know the Kingston HyperX DDR 500 cant run at CL 2.5 rite
Regards - Porsche -

PoRsChe, This is a very good question ,And I asked the Tech. Support Guy At Corsair the Same Question, and he said that all or Mostly all the 500 MHZ Modules out there are being recognized as 400,and 433 MHZ Modules, is that since there is No REAL JEDEC PC-4000 (DDR-500) Standard Yet Published, that the BIOSes for Motherboards are Recognizing them as PC-3200 or PC-3500 (DDR-400, or DDR-433) Modules ...And the reason for this is, That not every Motherboard (BIOS) Manufacturer out there except for the "Big-Four" (MSI, ASUS, ABIT, GIGABYTE), Has High-Performance BIOSes Programed to be able to even read the SPD Codes of such "High-Speed" (DDR-500) Memory, so if the Module were to be Coded in it's SPD as DDR-500 or higher those other Manufacturers BIOSes would not be able to read the SPD, therefore the PC would NOT run ..So this is the Memory Makers way (Until a JEDEC PC-4000 Standard is Created) to keep the Consumers and the other Motherboard Manufacturers (VIA, DFI SOYO TYAN,ect.ect) Happy, as the Memory will indeed work in their Boards ....I know, I am not very good at explaining these things , But I gave it a Try ...He said the a JEDEC DDR-500 Standard is due out soon......And now the Memory Makers have started Making DDR-533, and DDR-566 Modules ..So the same will hold true for those too, Until a JEDEC Standard is Created for them as well...Do you understand?........Sean REILLY875

Similar Messages

  • Ballistix pc4000 ddr 500 running @ ddr 214 - help please?

    k8n neo2 plat bios ver 1.3
    3200 winchester
    2x512 ballistix pc 4000 ddr sdram in slots 1+3
    Hi
    Im hoping someone will be able to help. I cannot get this memory to run at anything more than a ddr clock of 107 (214 ddr) when i set the timing to 'auto' on the memlock. Cpu-z says this speed but also has '256 clocks' in the 'dram idle timer' in its memory tab (meant to be 16 clocks im sure).
    Ive messed around with it for ages trying to get it to work and have just received various error sounds and messages causing me to have to reset the cmos numerous times just to be able to get back in.
    I can get it to work if i lock the memlock at 200 but this is causing it to run at only pc3200 (ddr 400) speed, not to mention giving me the inability to overclock it at all. Timings are set at what the memory is meant to run ddr 500 at - 2.5-4-8-4 (but im only sticking 2.7 volts through it, from stated 2.8, as it's running slower).
    The crucial tool said it would work fine, the spec of the memory and board indicate that they're compatible with each other, and several people in the thread on this site are using it (1 person @ 235 fsb) - so i seem to think that i may be missing something.
    Also, each stick of the memory works fine on it's own, got it to ddr 440 without flinching (220 fsb... ), and stable, no crashes or nothing - hours of use and numerous benchmarking. But 2 sticks just sends the ddr clock back to 107 unless i lock the memlock.
    I've run memtest whilst locking the memlock at 200 and it showed no errors. Im going to do the same thing overnight tonight with the ddr clock knackered at 107 - see what shows up.
    My other memory works fine - 2x512 2700 kingstonX.
    Can anyone help? Much thanks

    Try a BIOS upgrade.
    Maybe it's no coincidence that my OCZ 3500EB was also limited to 214 mhz on my K8N Neo (not Neo2) with BIOS 1.4. Both sets of RAM use ICs made by Micron so perhaps it's no coincidence (not to say they're exactly the same.  They're not.)
    Upping to beta BIOS 1.52, 1.55, or 1.56 fixes things for me.
    Maybe for the Neo2 you should try beta 1.36 or 1.37 then? Worth a try.  I believe that K8N Neo BIOS 1.4 and K8N Neo2 BIOS 1.3 are total clunkers.
    Good luck...

  • DDR 500 help

    hie , how come my HyperX DDR 500 cant be detected as DDR 500 ?
    in CPU-Z
    only show DDR 400 only
    why ?
    when i set the memory frequency in the bios
    it refuse to boot

    PoRsChe, This is a very good question ,And I asked the Tech. Support Guy At Corsair the Same Question, and he said that all or Mostly all the 500 MHZ Modules out there are being recognized as 400,and 433 MHZ Modules, is that since there is No REAL JEDEC PC-4000 (DDR-500) Standard Yet Published, that the BIOSes for Motherboards are Recognizing them as PC-3200 or PC-3500 (DDR-400, or DDR-433) Modules ...And the reason for this is, That not every Motherboard (BIOS) Manufacturer out there except for the "Big-Four" (MSI, ASUS, ABIT, GIGABYTE), Has High-Performance BIOSes Programed to be able to even read the SPD Codes of such "High-Speed" (DDR-500) Memory, so if the Module were to be Coded in it's SPD as DDR-500 or higher those other Manufacturers BIOSes would not be able to read the SPD, therefore the PC would NOT run ..So this is the Memory Makers way (Until a JEDEC PC-4000 Standard is Created) to keep the Consumers and the other Motherboard Manufacturers (VIA, DFI SOYO TYAN,ect.ect) Happy, as the Memory will indeed work in their Boards ....I know, I am not very good at explaining these things , But I gave it a Try ...He said the a JEDEC DDR-500 Standard is due out soon......And now the Memory Makers have started Making DDR-533, and DDR-566 Modules ..So the same will hold true for those too, Until a JEDEC Standard is Created for them as well...Do you understand?........Sean REILLY875

  • DDR 500 memory compatible with MSI K8N Neo4 Platninum?

    Hi Folks,
    I have a MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum PCB version 1 (S939/Nvidia NForce 4 Ultra), running the latest BIOS version.  I wondered if DDR 500/PC4000 memory would work at DDR500 speeds?  I note that the MSI webpage for this mobo only mentions DDR400 and in the manual, the BIOS description under "Advanced Chipset Features" - "Memclock Index Value (MHz)" says the maximum speed is 200MHz.  However, when I go to this setting in my own BIOS, I can set it to 250MHz.  I assume that this should give me DDR500?  Would altering this "Memclock Index Value" above 200 MHz cause any other problems with FSB, CPU, HT, PCIe, PCI speeds etc. or is it completely independent?  Does anyone have any recommendations of what sticks would work best (I was thinking 2 * 1024 Mb of Corsair XMS or OCZ XTC).  Now that DDR2 is standard and DDR prices are creeping up, there doesn't seem to be much difference in price between DDR 400 and DDR 500 memory.  Evern if my mobo can't support it, is there any merit in buying DDR 500 memory and running it at DDR 400 or intermediate speeds?
    Cheers!

    The x2 4800 would run 10x250=2500mhz.
    With ddr500 it's beautifull,since you can use the cas latencies which are suited for the memory.
    I have to lower my timings a bit to run them at 500mhz.Not much though,but I don't know what the long term prospect is for my memory if I maintain that for long periods of time.
    As for running games,I found lower cas timings make my games run smoother opposed to the slightly higher ddr clock with slower timings.
    But as mentioned,set cpu vcore 1 step higher in bios,leave the memory at auto,set cpu fsb or HTT at 250mhz,and use the default multiplier of 10 or also leave on auto.'The memory runs in spec and you wont damage it,only the cpu's get another 100mhz and should be a little bit more spicey while temps shouldn't go much higher as it is now.
    The sticks should fit physically and I ran mine once at 266mhz stable,and they are just pc3200@200mhz

  • How do I take advantage of DDR 500?

    Well I posted last because I didnt notice I had picked DDR500 (Corsair CMX512-4000PT) in my new system order instead of DDR400 and I was worried about possible failures. But now I've got it and its all good and running stable. A little warm though maybe.  Yesterday room temp 85F, Cpu 49C, system 48C. Wish I had a AC in here. So now here I am and after reading all these posts I wonder how to take possible advantage of my memory. Obvoiusly I'm a newby at this so any step by step would be appreciated. I see in BIOS and Corecell I can bump up the whole system. I had it running at FSB 206 yesterday just to see and it ran fine.

    run the ram and cpu in a 1:1 ratio, and just increase the fsb of the cpu, with added voltage for stability

  • Can i run ddr500 at 500 on neo4??

    hey all, two questions:
    1:  i've just purchased 2GB of Crucial Ballistix (1GBx2) and am wondering if theres a way to get these to run at 250MHzx2?  When in the bios it seems the settings only go up to 200MHz. 
    2:  And does it matter that these sticks have chips on both sides?  Any help would be great.

    Ya, you have to OC your system with the Memclock set at 200 ( which is 1:1 ).
    Try this :
    Memeclock 200
    Timings 2.5-3-3-6
    Agressive Timings: Disabled
    CPU Spread Spectrum: Disabled
    FSB 250
    CPU x9
    HT x4
    VCORE 1.425 +6.6%
    VDIMM 2.75v
    This would put your ram at ddr 500.
    Just be aware that the Neo4 has issues with some Winchester Cores right now. If it likes it you should be able to POST at those settings, other wise try HT x2.

  • Is 1.3 Bios really better than 1.52B?? Neo2 Board and Some Observations!

    Hi All... I read this post on the forums and it got me thinking and i did some fiddling and made some observations..
    This is whith regard to the 1.3Bios being better than the 1.52B Bios.. because it would let you run in turbo mode...
    Ok i've spent the last 60mins testing and i came up with the following..
    1.3BIOS
    With the 1.3Bios.. no matter what memory timings u set... it does'nt show in CPU-Z and it does'nt make a difference in the memory bandwith scores...
    For example my ram was rated at 2.5-3-3-8 .. i changed it to 2.5-2-3-8 .. it did'nt change and my scores remained the same..
    Going from Slow to Fast to Turbo.. did'nt incrase my scores.. actually.. donno how.. but i got a decrease in scores..
    The only thing that was noticable was that MSI core-center overclocks the CPU a lil more than what is set in BIOS..
    1.52B BIOS
    With the 1.52B Bios... u can change the memory timings and it does show in CPU-Z and it makes a massive difference with Sisoft sandra.. 250mbps more..
    What u set in the bios .. u get with the 1.52B.. Corecenter does'nt mess around and overclock it more..
    Going from Slow to Turbo did give me an increase in scores.. slightly..
    Im now running Ultra-Turbo.. and i get a sisoft bandwith score of 5250Mbps at 3.21G..
    CONCLUSION
    So infact i think the 1.52B is better than the 1.3 . I don't have a Radeon so i donno how these bios's work with the cards cause i've read about some problems... I'm getting one soon so 'ill post some info about that in a fortnight..
    I personally think this board is great.. atleast the one i have.. never had a problem.. had it for 3 months.. i have a revision 1.. no DOT sticker.. and just the Neo2-S version... I've used Spectec 333 on this board too (dual) had no problems..
    Wish i had some DDR-500 so i could test whether this board can do 1:1 above 250...whether it has a 1:1 limitation above 285 like some other boards.. that is my only doubt.. anywayz.. i hope atleast some of u are sailing as smoothly with this board as i have..
    Get some nice ram .. this Twinmos Dual channel kit DDR400 with the Twinmos chips are really great.. and i recommend it..

    Quote
    Originally posted by DeReD
    1.3BIOS
    With the 1.3Bios.. no matter what memory timings u set... it does'nt show in CPU-Z and it does'nt make a difference in the memory bandwith scores...
    For example my ram was rated at 2.5-3-3-8 .. i changed it to 2.5-2-3-8 .. it did'nt change and my scores remained the same..
    Going from Slow to Fast to Turbo.. did'nt incrase my scores.. actually.. donno how.. but i got a decrease in scores..
    That´s wrong. RAM-Settings are displayed fine. Turbo does make a BIG difference in scores. About 15% more performance. In Games and in benchmarks like 3dmark and sandra, too.

  • K7N2 Delta-L

    My spec :
    - K7N2 Delta-L
    - Sempron 2200+
    - ADATA Vitesta DDR 500 256 mb
    - FIC Radeon 9000 Pro 128 Mb 128 bit
    - HDD Seagate Barracuda 40 Gb
    - PSU Simbadda 350 watt
    My K7N2 no screen if I turn on it but if I use another board, My computer have no problem....Is my K7N2 dead?
    I'm sorry if my language is bad...thx

    Before it I upgrade my processor athlon xp 1800+ to sempron socket A 2200+ but I remember to update bios. Thx I want to try u'r solution if problem continue....

  • 1:1 FSB:Memory ratio on 865pe fisr (250+Mhz)

    Does anyone have memory that is capable of running 250mhz and over? I was interested in knowing whether the bios changes your ratio to 5:4 when you select 250mhz FSB and over like mine does. I don't know why it changes the ratio when the ram is capable of running at 250+ on 2.7V easy. Nothing is holding me back as I have tested all relevant components at required voltages so it is strictly a bios/mobo issue as I see it. Do any of the 5 bioses for the 865pe allow for higher than 250mhz 1:1 ratio? Could it be the brand of memory I have? It is detected as pc3200 memory which is actually a good thing cause it 'tricks' the mobo into thinking it is compatible ram. But even if the ram is not on the list of 'compatible' ram modules, this should not cause such a problem as that. My theory is that this MSI board has set parameters coded into the bios that govern the way the mobo behaves IRRESPECTIVE of the capabilites of the components in the system. If your mem modules, cpu, etc. fall under a certain category defined by MSI, the mobo will change them back to a default or 'safer' setting if you increased it beyond what the deem is acceptable. How do I know this? Well if you use an utility that allows you to change parameters in windows, such as MSI's very own corecenter you will see that the computer will run at a speed that it would not run at if set in the bios (assuming that your components are capable of running at increased speeds). If anyone has done extensive testings and can tell me which of the 5 current bioses are the least restrictive on user settings, can they please let me know?
    My sys specs are:
    MSI NEO2 865PE FISR
    P4 2.4C 800 FSB
    2x512MB ADATA PC4000
    ATI Radeon 9700
    WD 40GB 8MB Cache
    IBM Deskstar 120GXP 40GB
    Lite-On 16x DVD rom
    Enermax 550W PSU
    As of now I am in hardcore diagnostic OC mode. I am taking the time to verify the limits of each of my components separately. Only one component is stressed at any one time and the others are all run as below spec as possible. Lets see what turns up. Let me know what bios works best for you guys.

    U had any problems with u'r ADATA DDR 500?
    Where did u pick it up??
    see my other post for my specs
    http://www.msi.com.tw/program/e_service/forum/index.php?threadid=27815&boardid=10&styleid=1&sid=f383feb6d3080c2e532cb89a2201c498

  • Memory question

    I have a couple of questions about memory.
    1. I have Corsair TwinX XMS PC3200 2x1024mb. settings at corsair are 2.5-3-3-6 It shows up in speedfan as:       
     FSB-DRAM................. CPU/14
     CAS# Latency............. 3.0 clocks
     RAS#to CAS# Delay..... 3 clocks
     Ras Precharge...............3 Clocks
    Cycle Time(tras).............7 Clocks
    Bank Cycle Time(trc)......10 clocks
    DRAM IdleTimer.............16 clocks
      I just want to run it at a better speed to get the most out of it.
    2. Plus my MB supports DDR266/333/400 modules. Does that mean I can't run the 433/500/533/550?
     When I started to overclock I had the DRAM set on 400 and with the OC it went to 424. with no problems. Then I had to drop it to 333 to keep OCing and got the DRAM up to 198 running stable. I had to drop the FSB so eventually the DRAM went to 184. I ran Sandra with the 424mhs setting and the 184mhz setting and the 184mhz setting was really a lot quicker...so I stayed there.
        Now how can I get better speeds out of the memory? Would it be better to buy a different memory to achieve my goals?

    MR,
    You Stated :
    1. I have Corsair TwinX XMS PC3200 2x1024mb. settings at corsair are 2.5-3-3-6 It shows up in speedfan as:       
    FSB-DRAM................. CPU/14
    CAS# Latency............. 3.0 clocks
    RAS#to CAS# Delay..... 3 clocks
    Ras Precharge...............3 Clocks
    Cycle Time(tras).............8 Clocks
    Bank Cycle Time(trc)......12 clocks
    DRAM IdleTimer.............16 clocks
      I just want to run it at a better speed to get the most out of it.
    The figures you posted above look more like figure you would have gotten from the memory Tab in CPU Z. Can you confirm this and also post all figures you get form the SPD Tab in CPU Z regarding your RAM. If you RAM setting are set to Auto in BIOS then the above figures are really your SPD readings that were applied by your BIOS Auto RAM setting feature.  The CPU Z SPD read out will confirm this. If this is the Case then you have Corsair TwinX2048-3200 Kit (3-3-3-8) vice the TwinX2048-3200C2 (2--3-3-6*) with the asterix annotated as [* These parts support 2-3-3-6 latency on Intel platforms, and 2.5-3-3-6 latency on AMD platforms.]. Double check your product number on your RAM and pay perticular attention to letters and/or numbers after TwinX2048-3200....>  Check result against listing the TwinX matched pair memory listing here http://www.corsairmemory.com/corsair/xms.html
    Plus my MB supports DDR266/333/400 modules. Does that mean I can't run the 433/500/533/550?
    You could likely use memory up to DDR 500 on your board if you wanted to OC and leave ram at 1:1 ratio. Higher memory  would be wasted money.
    Good luck,

  • Memory timing (2,2,2,5 vs 2.5,3,3,6 vs 3.0,4,4,8) Benchmark scores..

    Hi
    See ..
    PCMark2002
    3DMark2k3
    AquaMark3
    Lame MP3 Encoder
    3D Studio MAX v5.1
    Unreal Tournament 2k3
    Warcraft III
    Main Concept 1.3.1 Mpeg Encoder
    Comments?
    Source : Toms Hardware

    Yes I read the Article, and Yes of Coarse CAS 2 is going to be Faster than CAS 2.5, and CAS 3.0 When you Are Only Comparing DDR-400 Memory ..I want to see a test Between DDR-400 at CAS 2.0, and DDR-500 or 533, at CAS 3.0 and You will Not see the Gaps that you Do with just DDR-400 againt itself....As you can see be the First Chart on the How it Works Page (That you did not Post) that the Max Bandwith that DDR-400 has when in Dual DDR Configuration is 6.4 GB/SEC, But if you Look at the DDR-533 With CAS 3.0, It Has a Max of 8.4 GB/SEC!!..That is a 25% Increase ...............Sean REILLY875

  • DRAM Frequency 400 (1:1)?

    I have 2*512 MB DDR RAM Dual Channel PC4000 EL OCZ with MSI 865PE Neo2-
    I have followed OCZ recommended settings for MSI 865PE Neo2,OCZ recommendations but when I set DDR frequency to 400 I get graphical problems in certain 3d games (flickering menus in Neverwinter Nights).  .
    If I set DRAM frequency to 333 (5:4 CPU/DRAM ratio?) the problems go away. My FSB is currently at 240 Mhz. I have a 2,6 P4.
    Shouldn't my memory be able to work in DRAM Frequency 400 (1:1)?

    OK.. :-D)Now I see where you typed OCZ 4000 RAM...But as you can see We dont always look at the Serial Number and we BOTH read your POST wrong,..It would be better when you are Talking about RAM speed to Double List the Specs.  ie PC-4000 (DDR-500), as that is what I try to do in most Threads, as you can see, it is easy to misread (add another 0 ) and now we are all on the wrong Page .....Well now that we are on the SAME Page ..Your Memory should be able to reach Speeds of FSB=240X2=480 MHZ, But you most definitely Have it Set to "AUTO" instead of 400 MHZ in the "RAM Frequency" Option, as with it set to "Auto" the Chipset(BIOS) looks to the Modules SPD for the Speed that the Module is Rated for .....And if you still cant reach 240 FSB with it set to "Auto" Try Setting the Memory Timings to Speed and Your PAT to Slow.................Sean REILLY875

  • Msi neo2 k8n 54g platium and 4 memory sticks problem

    Hello i used to be running with 2x 512 geil ddr 550mhz ultra ddr ram, and got a deal at my friends pc store, about 2x 512 geil ddr 500 ultra set ddr ram, but when ever i put the 2 new stics in my pc it dossent even give me a screen, i just  powers op no screen and my monitor just blinks in the power led, then i take them out,and runs again, i tried a newer amd 3500 with a newer memory controller, but no luck, i even tried setting the memory setting all to auto or as high they can get in cas latency, still no luck, and the two sticks i had in was dual, and so are the new ones , hope you guy's can help
    My Pc Spec's
    Amd 3500+
    Msi k8n ne2 54g platium [bios 1.B Newest 1]
    2x512 geil Ddr 550Mhz Pc 4400 [the ones i want to add are 2x512 geil 500Mhz pc 4000]
    Gecube Ati x800xt pe
    Sb audigy 2 zs
    Asus TV card
    2xSeagate 120Gb Ata 100 i think
    2xSeagate 160Gb Sata [Raid]
    1xWestern digital 250Gb Sata
    1xSeagate 300Gb Sata
    Sony Dvd burner
    Cdrom 52x
    hope this helps too

    bejon2000,
    Good point bejon,
    I re-read the article and this what it says: " ....If you remember, older Athlon 64 processors based on 130nm cores didn’t support 4 double-sided DDR400 SDRAM modules working at 400MHz frequency at all and reduced their frequency to 333MHz automatically. The today’s processors based on 90nm cores offer us a few better solutions. The D core revision also known as Winchester allows using four double-sided DDR400 memory DIMMs if the Command Rate timing is set to 2T."
    From what you posted the Winnie D core CPU may need a little TLC and voltage boost. but it should run 4 X double sided 512 sticks at DDR 400 and 2T. Venice or later core may not need such TLC or voltage boost but still need manual  selections in BIOS Cell menu.
    Thanks for pointing this out,

  • Overclocking decisions (Mainly RAM freq.)

    Hello everybody:
    This is my first post. Hope to come here often and participate whenever I can.
    First of all, I'm new to this stuff of overclocking, but it is a very interesting subject.
    I read the sticky posts on this category, but still some questions rise.
    I'm planning on building a system for me. I'll be doing mostly programming, digital photo processing (a lot of), and Video Editing (also a lot).
    I'm checking MoBo's from several brands, looking through websites with tests and comparisons and benchmarking
    I'm almost decided on MSI 875P FIS2R + P4 because I think Hyperthreading can be very useful in the programs I will use. Also i'll need lots and lots and lots of space, so i'm thinking on RAID 0, with 4 SATA 150 250GB drives. This should be enough
    Also stability is somehow an issue. I can't afford to lose hours of work just because the darn thing freezes!
    So, now that you know the story of my life, here come the questions:
    I'm actually quite confused with all this mix of DDR, FSB and CPU frequencies.
    Assuming I'll buy a P4 C Northwood, I cant' go over 4 Ghz with it, right?
    So I'll assume the best performance I can get from a P4 C system would be using a 3.2 Ghz processor with DDR 500 and an FSB running at 1000 Mhz, right? This would allow me to run the system at 1:1 4Ghz, the processor's limit.
    Would the MSI 875P FIS2R support these settings? Would the system be stable (in theory)?
    In terms of performance, what would happen if I used DDR of a different frequency (higher or lower)?
    Would a system of P4 C 3Ghz + DDR 533 + FSB running at 1066 Mhz be more stable then the previous one? Are there motherboards able to support 1000-1100 FSB's?
    Running a system at a ratio different than 1:1 would affect performance in what way?
    What's your opinion on More RAm vs Faster RAM (2 GB DDR 400 v 1 GB DDR 550), for general use? Would a system benefit more from the former or the later?
    Faster SPD or higher frequency? (For instance 2-2-2-6 DDR400 vs 3-4-4-7 DDR 550)
    One last question regarding the case/ventilation/power... Any suggestions?
    Sorry for the long post
    Hope to hear from you
       Jose Rodrigues  

    I will try to answer what I can.
    If you are going to O/C to 4Ghz good luck, and you will have to consider better cooling than stock.
    As far as your ratio question I was running in 5:4 @ 3.3Ghz but games like Age of Empire and Galactic Battlegrounds would stutter like crazy. When I tried 1:1 @ 3.0Ghz everything was fine. NO stutter an all. It has been mentioned on this forum before and I totally agree, 1:1 is best.
    My opinion on more ramm would be (general use) 1Gb is enough and the higher the ddr the better, as long as the mobo can handle it. DDR 500 will O/C better than DDR 3200
    The higher frequency ramm usually do better with relaxed timmings. 3-4-4-8
    Ventilation is a book in itself. In thru the front out thru the rear. Putting a blowhole in the top is always a good idea. Chieftech makes a good case. I would stick with a brand name PSU . PC Power and Cooling make a great PSU, but they are pricey.
    If you set up RAID 0 with 4 250Gb HD I am shure you know that what you will have is a very fast 250Gb SATA HD.
    I hope that helps.

  • Improvement need to be done bios 1.55

    moving from bios 1.4 to 1.55 beta is good, but I found one thing that this bios is need to be work at and that is the stability on 1T. My kingston hyperX 4000 is design at 3-4-4-8-1T @ ddr 500 to take full advantage of the memory but the system wont post at very slight HTT adjustment other than 2T. 1T is much more responsive and gives you better score on Sandra. If MSI fix this stability issue this board will come close to DFI board known for best stability and overclocking at high rate.

    Quote
    Originally posted by cool'n'quiet
    Wannafly overclocks with just 1 stock of RAM. For the majority of us who overclock with 1GB, it will be even harder to achieve high rates without resorting to 2T. But that's mostly an issue for socket 939 people. Socket 754 seems to have a limit of DDR500 (appx) when using 2 double sided dimms, due to drive strength. So you might run up against that limit (at 1T) before 2T even becomes a consideration.
    I'd be very happy to be proven wrong: are there any 754 users out there with 2x double-sided dimms getting significantly more than DDR500?
    yes, 1 stick can go high than 2.
    If you want to see some oc about how high 2 sticks of 512mb rams go,you can visit this site:
    forum.coolaler.com
    Just because many of them can go above DDR500 with 2 sticks of 512MB rams when 1 T enabled.
    Why?
    TCC5 and TCCD based rams are so NICE.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do i change the background color in pages

    I am using the app on an iPad2. I I would like to know how to change the background color.

  • Cycle desktop pictures doesn't loop

    Hi, For my desktop picture, I have a photo album in iPhoto of all my favourite travel photos. I set the System Preferences to change them every minute, in random order. My problem is that I only have about 60 of them, and so after about an hour, it g

  • What is a web app

    What is a web app and where can I look at some examples? Thanks

  • Wrong currency sign

    Somewhere along the way, AppleWorks 6.2.9 on my machine has decided that my currency sign is the British Pound sign (£). Granger Morton posted this response when I mentioned the problem in another thread: I just had this problem and in desperation ch

  • Help Please Help Wiki Unexpected Error

    I restarted the Wiki server and now when I am trying to all I get is Unexpected Error and this on the Web access log "GET /wiki/session/verification_failed HTTP/1.1" 304 I have 80+ Students working on their Histroy Projects at the moment and no one c