Deactivated imput-ready feature for a single line/cell

Hello to everybody.
I've looking for a possibility to deactivate the input-ready feature for just a single cell.
My table shows a collection of accounts from an object.
There's a column for the actual value and right of it the input-ready column for the planning value that should be typed in by the user.
One row of it contains a value that shouldn't be planned.
The problem is, I want to have them in the table but as I said not input ready.
Is this possible? If so, how?
Thanks in advance.
Sebastian

Yes you can do this. If you do not want the user to change some accounts then you can make freeze this by applying data slices.
In the planninh modeler goto the info provider tab , there you can see data slice tab.
There are two types of data slices;
Data slice based on selection:
If you want to freeze any data then you can either hard code the values or you can do it through an customer exit variable for a characteristic.
Data slice based on exit class:
You can create a custom class and put your code in that and inlcude this class in the data slice tab under exit class.
Edited by: tilak marrapu on Jul 31, 2009 4:03 PM

Similar Messages

More than one output for a single line in an sql

Hi There,
I have a table like the following ,
A B
1 5
2 4
I want to output the following,
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
2-2
2-3
2-4
Is it possible to write a single sql statement to do this?
Thanks,
--JJ

Something like this ->
satyaki>
satyaki>select * from v$version;
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
CORE    10.2.0.3.0      Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
Elapsed: 00:00:00.20
satyaki>
satyaki>
satyaki>with jose
2 as
3    (
4      select 1 A, 5 B from dual
5      union all
6      select 2, 4 from dual
7    )
8 select j2.A, j1.B
9 from (
10          select rownum B
11          from jose
12          connect by rownum < B
13        ) j1,
14        jose j2
15 where j1.B <= j2.B
16 order by j2.A,
17          j1.B;
         A          B
         1          1
         1          2
         1          3
         1          4
         1          5
         2          1
         2          2
         2          3
         2          4
9 rows selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:01.06
satyaki>Regards.
Satyaki De.

How to update PO Price only for a single line item and not other Line Item

Hi
My requirement is not to update Price of PO from PIR if the Final Invoice Indiactor is not set and it is not a return PO. I am trying to do this using
BAPI_PO_CHANGE to update price automatically from Pricing record using
POITEM-PO_ITEM = '00001'
POITEM-CALCTYPE = 'B'.
POITEMX-PO_ITEM = '00001'
POITEMX-CALCTYPE = 'X'.
The price gets updated for the line item 1 as well as other line item which I do not want. Please can you tell how to restrict that.
Is it possible to restrict through configuration if this indicator is set there should be no price update. I tried to check in ME22n and if I update the condition item by pressing the update button the other item price also gets updated.
Thanks
Arghadip

Timestamp is date and time together in one field..
Search for data element TIMESTAMP.
If you are getting this in your table.
If you are getting time and date in different fields then you can use the function module
given below....
CALL FUNCTION 'DELTA_TIME_DAY_HOUR'
EXPORTING
    t1            =
    t2            =
    d1            =
    d2            =
IMPORTING
   MINUTES       =
Then you can convert minutes into seconds..
Function module credit to BrightSide it works....but only it will give difference in minutes
Regards,
Lalit Mohan Gupta.

How to calculate Time difference for a single line item

Hi All,
I have an issue where you have to calculate the Start time and End Time , Start Date and End Date for a particular Work item number
For eg ;
WI_ID WI_CD WI_CT
000001312610 02/09/2009 09:48:4 02/09/2009 09:48:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 09:54:4 02/09/2009 09:54:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 09:54:5 02/09/2009 09:54:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 10:07:0 02/09/2009 10:07:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 10:07:0 02/09/2009 10:07:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 10:16:5 02/09/2009 10:16:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 10:16:7 02/09/2009 10:16:9
Similarly I get the Endtime and ENd dayfrom other table for same work item.So my requirement here is
in the it should show the display in a single cell .as, 5secs, 5 secs,4 secs,9secs,4 secs,2 secs
for each work item.
Can any body help me on this issue.
Any pionters for this are much helpful for me.
Thanks
Rohini.

Timestamp is date and time together in one field..
Search for data element TIMESTAMP.
If you are getting this in your table.
If you are getting time and date in different fields then you can use the function module
given below....
CALL FUNCTION 'DELTA_TIME_DAY_HOUR'
EXPORTING
    t1            =
    t2            =
    d1            =
    d2            =
IMPORTING
   MINUTES       =
Then you can convert minutes into seconds..
Function module credit to BrightSide it works....but only it will give difference in minutes
Regards,
Lalit Mohan Gupta.

Withholding tax postings for a single line item during invoice posting

Hello folks,
I have a question from my client about withholding tax postings during invoice postings.
Scenario is
1. There's a PO with multiple line items.
2. A vendor invoice is posted against this PO which has multiple line items. Not all line items are subject to WHT. Is there a way to post WHT specific to a line item while doing MIRO.
3. One line item without WHT and another one with WHT in the same invoice.
Inputs are highly appreciated
Thanks,
Sasidhar

Dear Sasidhar
while posting document remove the withholding tax code manually then system will not post the w/h tax.
in your case select vendor line and remove the tax code then system will not calculate the tax.
another line dynamically calculate the tax.
Regards
Madhu M
Please refer the below wiki pages.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/UgTpCw   (Rupee word Format)
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/8oMEDg    ( J1INEMIS   )
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/2BAMDg   ( J1INACKN )
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/x/3xAMDg   ( J1INCCREP)

Freely-programmed value help for a single ALV cell

Greetings everyone,
I have a freely-programmed value help that works beautifully when attached to the context element of a single field, but now I'm needing to use it in an ALV for a specific cell. Is there a way to shut off the dropdown for all of the rows (cells) in the column where I don't need it? Or, is there an appropriate workaround that can deliver the same results?
I've found several posts that address similar issues, but nothing for this exact problem.
Thanks,
Jason Block

I take it from reading your description what you want is a little more complicated than just controlling the read-only property on the input field. If I read you properly you still want to have all the cells in a column to be open for input, just on some of them you want to disable the value help. Is that correct? See these screen shots for clarification:
If you focus on the the input field in the first row, you get the value help:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tjung/2714133068/
However if you go to the second row and focus on the same input field in this column, you don't get the value help:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tjung/2714133094/
If this is what you want, then buckel up because this was a challenging one. The problem is that the value help specification is not done at the UI element level, but instead at the context attribute level. Therefore it can't be as simple as controlling a property on the inputField itself. What you will need to do is extend the context node that you have bound to the ALV. You need to add a second version of the attribute that is bound to your input field. In this second version you can set the value help specification to Disabled:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tjung/2713320505
Notice from the screen shot that I also added another attirbute called CVAR (type STRING). We will need that later. It will be used to store which cell variant show be used on a particular row.
Now we must go to the place in your code where you fill the context node with data. You will need to copy the data from your primary attribute to your secondary one. In my case I was copying the values from CARRID to CARRID2. Of course for update, you would need to merge the data back together before saving it back to the database. I also set a simple odd/even pattern of controller in the cell variant. I assume you will have some actual business logic that controls this:
data odd type boolean value abap_true.
   loop at lt_f_r_sflight[] assigning <ls_f_r_sflight>.
    clear ls_c_r_sflight.
    move-corresponding <ls_f_r_sflight> to ls_c_r_sflight.
    move <ls_f_r_sflight>-carrid to ls_c_r_sflight-carrid2.
    if odd = abap_true.
      odd = abap_false.
    else.
      odd = abap_true.
      ls_c_r_sflight-cvar = 'NOVH'.
    endif.
    insert ls_c_r_sflight into table lt_c_r_sflight[].
endloop.
lo_r_sflight->bind_table( lt_c_r_sflight[] ).
Next is the logic in the initialization of the ALV. We will need to create two input fields - each bound to the different context attributes. We will make the one the primary cell editor. The other will become the cell editor of the cell variant. We then tell the column where it can get its cell variant value from:
DATA lo_cmp_usage TYPE REF TO if_wd_component_usage.
lo_cmp_usage =   wd_this->wd_cpuse_alv( ).
IF lo_cmp_usage->has_active_component( ) IS INITIAL.
    lo_cmp_usage->create_component( ).
ENDIF.
DATA l_salv_wd_table TYPE REF TO iwci_salv_wd_table.
l_salv_wd_table = wd_this->wd_cpifc_alv( ).
DATA l_table TYPE REF TO cl_salv_wd_config_table.
l_table = l_salv_wd_table->get_model( ).
l_table->if_salv_wd_table_settings~set_read_only( abap_false ).
DATA input1 TYPE REF TO cl_salv_wd_uie_input_field.
DATA l_column TYPE REF TO cl_salv_wd_column.
l_column = l_table->if_salv_wd_column_settings~get_column( 'CARRID' ).
CREATE OBJECT input1
    EXPORTING
      value_fieldname = 'CARRID'.
l_column->set_cell_editor( input1 ).
DATA input2 TYPE REF TO cl_salv_wd_uie_input_field.
CREATE OBJECT input2
    EXPORTING
      value_fieldname = 'CARRID2'.
DATA l_cv TYPE REF TO cl_salv_wd_cv_standard.
CREATE OBJECT l_cv.
l_cv->set_key( 'NOVH' ).
l_cv->set_editor( input2 ).
l_column->add_cell_variant( l_cv ).
l_column->set_sel_cell_variant_fieldname( 'CVAR' ).

Are the $60/1GB and $75/2GB smartphone single line plans eligible for the Military discount?

I noticed in the FAQ's for the single line plans that they are eligible for the EDGE discount. I just recently was able to get my Veteran status verified for my Military discount. FYI, DO NOT try to do the verification process online, it takes forever and three days! It only took thirty minutes in line at the retail location versus online, where I've been waiting for five days and it STILL is not verified!!! Anyways, while at the retail location I asked about their smartphone plans and I was quoted $75.00 for the single line plan at 2GB, but was also told that it was already discounted and thus was not eligible for my Military discount. If that is true then those plans should not be eligible for the EDGE discount either, but they are. So what is the correct answer?

Okay, so this is what I get out of all this.... The Military discount provides a 15% discount to monthly plans of $34.99 and above. A 25% discount on accessories is also available. So I could get a Single Line Plan with 2GB of data for $75.00 a month OR I could get a More Everything Plan for one line ($40.00 Line Access Fee - 15% Military Discount = $34.00) with 2GB of shareable data ($50.00 - 15% Military Discount = $42.50) for $76.50? In other words, a person without a Military (or for that matter any other) discount can get the SAME service cheaper (especially with the EDGE Single Line rate being only $65.00) than I could, after having served this great country of ours. Let's not forget that the Single Line plans are NOT eligible for the Military Discount, but they ARE eligible for the EDGE discount... Well ain't that just swell. What a (removed) to those of us that served! Thanks for much of nothing Verizon!!
If I am wrong, please forgive me, but then again that is why I am posting this, for clarification. I can not understand for the life of me why Verizon would not allow the Military Discount for the Single Line Plans, since they DO allow for the EDGE discount. Come on...
Edited as required by the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service
Message was edited by: Admin Moderator

Asset Creation in PR and PO and MIGO as a single Line item with "N" qty

Hi All,
In Purchase requestion ME51N
Now we are creating "n" number of assets ( All are same item but "s.no" will vary) with "n" number of line item.
Instead of this I have to enhance to create only one line item( For same item) with "n" quantity.
for the ASSET account Assignment we have to create Asset(Temp no) for the each item/quantity(if the same item).
as well as if they are going to create a PO with ref to PR they have to see all the "n" number of asset no.
In MIGO creation for each asset we have to assign S.No and Asset Tag.
How enhance the functionality in PR,PO and MIGO as well as in Invoice.
Is it any User Exit/BADI is available for PR/POand MIGO to show all the "n" number of assets for a single line item.
Kindly help me to give details to proceed further.
Thanks in advance.
sharma

Hi Sharma,
What i understand from your question is, you want to create a single line item in PR and PO. But the qty would be > 1.
Each single qty would have its own asset number in account asssignment tab of item details of PR & PO.
This is what you are expecting...Right???????????????
Then this is possible with certain limitations.
While creating PR, enter only one item with more qty.
In item details section, in account assignment tab, on top left corner, there will be a button called Multiple account assignments.
Click on it, then it looks like a table, where you can enter more than one line. (each line will have its own asset no)
And choose option Distribute on qty basis for field Distribution.
So that you can enter 1 qty for each line. ( Ex: if you created one line item in the item level with 10 qty, you need to maintain 10 line here, each qith 1 qty and diff asset no).
The only limitation to this is, the GRN would be treated as non valueted. So when you make GRN there wwould not be any accounting doc. ( means no use of GR/IR clearing account as like normal for POs)
when you prepare MIRO, all the assets will be capitalised and vendor credited.
But in case if you receive partial invoice, then you have choose manually in MIRO. which asset is ot be capitalised.
After entering the PO number in MIRO, there will be one line will be appeared with full qty. in the same line, move till the end of line, there you will have one button called Account assignments.
Choose and go there, here you can choose which individual asset line to be considired.
This will resolve your issue.
Thanks,
Srinu
SRBORIGI_MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENTS

Take ownership of a single line after contract done

how do i assume liability/ownership for my single line off of an existing family plan if my contract has already expired? can it be done in store at time of upgrade, starting new contract? or online? or by phone? thanks!

This can be done in the store (be sure it is a corporate store, use the Store Locator top right of the screen); I've done this with my children when they took their lines and started their own accounts. You can start your account and upgrade at the same time in a store, all in one transaction.
Since you will need to do the Assumption of Liability in person, it's just as easy to do the whole upgrade at the same time in the store. You can do just the AOL and then upgrade later , online or over the phone if you want, but the AOL is done in person.

Table for tax code line item after miro

Can anybody tell table for tax code line item (other than BSET) after MIRO.
Raj

Hi,
First let me explain you the logic in this repot.
If a document have more than one GL accounts relevant for tax and having the same tax code. So there is only one tax line for that tax code in BSET.
Now in the standard reports like S_ALR_87012357, output has the tax base amount etc, based on tax line from BSET which is a single line the above document. However this single line contains multiple tax relevant account and thus SAP can not show all the G/L account for this single line in the report S_ALR_87012357. So SAP picks up the first account in the output.
The declaration in this report is not wrong, as the total gets calculated based on the tax code and which is correct and meets the tax reporting requirement.
If you want to see the G/L account wise output, you can use the program RFUMSV10. Refer OSS note 1175418 "RFUMSV00: G/L account display" for details.
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1175418
In your report, you can use this program logic for reference.
Regards,
Gaurav

Single line Textfield & PHP

Is it possible to have a single line TextField that retrieves
text using PHP from a Mysql database? I've managed to do it with a
Multi line Textarea but the same code doesn't seem to work with a
Single line TextField.
I've attached the code I tried for the Single line TextField.
Many thanks
Leao

typically you would put your connection and sql info in your
head and assign
your dataset a variable name, then reference the variable
name.
I don't see why that would effect your data retrieval, but
you didn't say
what your error was, eiither.
what's it telling you?
"Leao16" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:ecgatk$a98$[email protected]..
> Is it possible to have a single line TextField that
retrieves text using
> PHP
> from a Mysql database? I've managed to do it with a
Multi line Textarea
> but the
> same code doesn't seem to work with a Single line
TextField.
>
> I've attached the code I tried for the Single line
TextField.
>
> Many thanks
>
> Leao
>
> <form method="post" action="nnameamember1.php">
> <div align="center">
> <p>
> <input name="nnameamember1" type="text"
id="nnameamember1"
>
value="<?phpmysql_connect("mysql","username","password") or
> die(mysql_error());mysql_select_db("database_text") or
die(mysql_error());
> $result = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM grid")or
die(mysql_error()); $row =
> mysql_fetch_array( $result );echo
$row['nnameamember1'];?>" size="20">
> </p>
> <p>
> <input type="submit" value="change nickname">
> </p>
> </div>
> </form>
>

My contract has ended. Can I preorder an iPhone 6 and switch over to the $60/2GB per month single line plan?

When attempting to upgrade my phone on the website, there is no option to select the single line plan during checkout. Can I purchase the iPhone on the website and then call customer service to switch over to the single line plan? This plan is shown here: Single Line Cell Phone Plan from Verizon - Verizon Wireless

lily74,
That's great that you are getting this new phone! I'm sure you are excited! We are happy to make any necessary changes to your plan once you have received your phone! We definitely want to be on the best plan for your particular usage, so if you did not have the option to select your preferred plan, we are happy to assist you in getting on the one of your preference!
SandyS_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Transaction ME9E - Printing Single Line Schedule Agreement

We are trying to print a line item that has a different delivery address than that of the header. This is a single line document and the address is different. The problem we have is when the scheduling agreements has only one part number and the delivery address for the part number is different then the default company/plant address. This process is predominant when you have subcontract process. We are unable to print the address at the line level for a single line document but system does this correctly and prints this delivery address when there are two part numbers in scheduling agreement. How can we get this to work for us for single item documents? This is critical for our end user. We need to have the system access the text element ITEM_DELADDRESS in the MAIN window and not produce the address in the HEADER_DELADDRESS element in the CONSGNEE window.

Hello,
There are two possible status for schedule lines:
        1- Fixed schedule lines : System doesn't change these schedule lines upon MRP run
        2 Non fixed schedule lines : during MRP run, system deletes these schedule lines and creates new ones.
To make a schedule line fixed there are two possibilities:
                    1- User set manually the indicator fixed schedule line in transaction ME38
                    2- Schedule line lies within the firm period.
The firm period :
For each schedule agreement you can define the firm zone :
1- ME32L change schedule agreement
2- select the item then in toolbar> Item> More function-->additional data Scheduling control
enter the firm zone "number of days".
If schedule line lies whithin this zone system will kepp it and create new line for additional requirement
Best Regards

GR can not printed for PO-Multiple account assignment on single line item ,

Hi!
I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
Can you please let me have the solution ?
Thank snd regards,
Suranjana

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

ICal only displays a single line for entries in month view.

This means I can't see what my diary entries refer to. Can I change it to show two lines or the full entry, as iCal did in Snow Leopard?

Hi Guys, thanks for getting back to me.
the problem is purely about design view display and not about coding.
Below is how CS4 displays borders with two lines which I find difficult to decipher:
Then below is Macromedia DM 8 and this how I want the borders to look, with single lines to display the tables.
This may just be the way Abobe have decided to display tables in design view and there may not be any option to change it but if you know any way to change it I would be most greatful.
Thanks again.
G

Deactivated imput-ready feature for a single line/cell

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for