Deactivated objects after transport of Analytics Security Object

Hello Experts,
We made a release Upgrade to 7.3. To garantee the access to our reports I implemented a lot new Analytics Security Objects. In our development system they are all activated. After transporting them into the quality system, all of them are deactived and not usable.
Do you have any ideas?
kind regards
Frederike

Hi Sujai,
Just check is your ODS object Locked or any process job is running on it.
Was your transport successful.
Thanks
CK

Similar Messages

In which situation I need to active objects after transport

Hi Experts,
I'm wondering in which situation I need to active object after transport? In some cases, I have to active transformation, DTP, infoobject, multiprovider.... Does any one make a conclusion of that?
thanks in advance.
Eric

Sometimes, because of impact of a transport some other objects will be deactivated, then we need to manuaaly activate the objects after transport.
Also, sometimes transport after import process could not be able to activate the objects, then also we have to activate them manually.
Or suppose, you have moved and infoobject, due to which some other objects become inactive (where ever infoobjects is being used), then we have to activate them manually, if you dont want to transport them.

Test System (BQ1) Objects showing up wrong Source System after Transport.

Hi Experts,
We are working on IS-U BI7.0 Project. We have finished with our Development and have transported the DataSources, Transformations and DTPs from Development (BD1) into Test (BQ1) Systems.
We have entered values in the Conversion of Logical Source Systems correctly.
When we select the DataSource and Click Object Directory Entry from the Extras Menu, we found that the Original Source System is defined as BQ1 instead of BD1 (Development System), which is where the Object is getting Transported from.
We have implemented an SAP Note:1008633 (Incorrect Source System after Transport (RSTRAN 514) but couldn't resolve the issue.
We basically want all the Objects in the BQ1 (Test System) showing the Original Source System as BD1 (Development System) but only the DataSources and it's connected Transformations and DTPs are originating from the BQ1 (Test) System itself (The Transformations when Transported from BD1 to BQ1 are Transported with a different Technical Name which is very strange).
Had anyone faced similar problem and if so, what was the effective solution implemented.
Any help in this regard is very much appreciated.
Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
Chandu.

It is resolved by our Basis.
Thanks,
Chandu

What are the objects that goes inactive after Transportation

Hi,
Usually,What are the objects that goes inactive after Transportation?
If you have any links for tranportation ,please send.?
Regards.,
Naresh.

HI,
the main reason for most of the transports to fail is:
1)Transporting each and every object in the same transport request.
Ideally,
u2022The Infobjects should be transported first in a separate request.
u2022Then the Data source and the Info providers (Cube, ODS, Data source and Multiproviders) together in a separate request.
u2022At the end the transformations and the DTPu2019s in an another separate request.
If the above mention sequence is followed while transporting the transport failures can be avoided.
2)Also when a change is made to an ODS (I object added or deleted) it should again be transported along with the transformation but in separate request.
I.e. the ODS 1st and the transformation.
Hope this helps.
regards,
mahesh.

Update rules deactivated after transporting cube with zero elimination on

Hello,
The update rules were deactivated in the quality system after transporting the cube with the zero elimination flag switched on. However, the update rules in development were not deactivated when setting the zero elimination flag. So, the update rules in the "From" system were not deactivated. This only happened in the "To" System. Does anyone know why?
Thanks,
Maureen

If there is any change you did on cube, you need to re-activate your update rules.
Re-activate your UR and transport it. It should be ok.
Hope it helps..

After transport changes are not reflecting to other users

HI all it's urgent
One user abcd who had made some changes to some screens is not reflecting to other users after transport we have 2 clients 100 and 200 changes are reflecting in own user id we transported with scc1 transaction
with regards
vinod

I am not a developer, so pardon me if I misunderstood this question. I thought screens and other repository objects are client independent. That means the change should be evident in all clients without a need to transport.
Is this to do with security by any chance ( though it seems unlikely )? Can the other users see the change in the original client in which the request was made? That should help you determine whether the problem lies with the transport or outside. Also you can check the contents of the transport in SE01 and see if it holds the kind of data that you are expecting it to. I am guessing you have already generated the screen after saving the changes.
Hope this helps,
Sanket

Issue with migrated transformation rule after transport

Hello all,
We have migrated couple of update rules and transfer rules to transformation rules. All the transformation rules are active in development environment.
The issue is when we transport these transformation rules to QA, one of the fields of datapacket dimension "RECORD" becomes &R1& in the global structure of start routine and therefore, transport fails in QA. Along with this we had another issue that if we add any additional fields in the cube or ODS structure, the global structure in start routine doesn't change after transport in QA. Basically, it seems like it doesn't do anything when we do transport.
We tried couple of things by transporting entire flow inclding target and source objects, we also tried transporting only transformation with overwrite mode. But none of the things worked. We also have logged the message with SAP.
SAP suggested us to open the QA environment and perform the change manually. We did it and obviously we could activate the transformation rules. But when we tried to re-transport the transformation, it is keep failing with the error "Syntax Error". My assumption has after the transport, the field has become &R1& again.
Has anybody faced such issue? We are on Ehp1 SP7.
- Danny

Thanks Murali,
Yes as I mentioned SAP suggested us to open the box and do it manually, but once we are done with the manual changes, we tried transporting the same transformation rule again, which I guess going to be the case in case of any future enhancement. Transport failed and it says "Syntax Error".
The transformations we activated manually in the target system are active, but when we try to load the data, it throws the exception error.
Any clue ?? Is it working fine in your system after you did manual changes? Did all future transport go well ?
- Danny

Web template with HTML framset not working after transport

Hi,
I've built a frameset which consists of two web-templates (role-menu and content area) those two are combined together using plain HTML which does not acontain any web items (uploaded via WAD). This works fine in development. After transporting to our QA environment all the templates have been transported with concode 0, but the frameset does not get loaded. I always get an "Error loading template ...". The two templates which contain web items work fine when used stand-alone.
When looking in transport connection I see the following message:
"Object ZWF_WEB_FRAMESET (Web Template Name) could not be collected for object ()"
I also see the same behavior on another transport of a template. Nine out of ten ar fine, but one, all are exact copies - only the query used is different, does not work either. The query that is used has been transported and is working.
Has anybody an idea what could cause this?
Is there a way to regenerate templates (like RSRT for queries) ?
Thanks in advance
Bernd Dümmel
KODAK Stuttgart
using ve created a

Did you upload the video?
Did you provide the correct path to your HTML object?

After Transporting the request RFC Destination is empty in SWCV and BEA

Hi All,
we are using SAP NW Mobile 7.1 SP08
After transporting the SWCV & Backend adapter, in the transported system the RFC Destination is empty
Please help me to fix this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Joseph Beevin.

Hi,
When an SWCV is trnasported to a another system,the backend destination will be empty in the target system.,We need to configure the bakcned destination in the target sytem through the DOE Adimin.
DOE_ADmin Portal -->Configuration --->Backend Configuration.
In the backend configuration,select the SWCV for which the destination needs to be configured.Select the parameter "RFC DESTINATION FOR BACKEND"
When the SWCV is selected all the active Data Objects will be listed in the table below
Insert the above parameter to the parameter list(the table below)
Give the name of the availlable backemnd destination name in the "text value" column of the table for each data object and save it.
Now the backend destination is configured correctly in the target system.Please try this..
Regards,
Muralikrishna T.

Infospoke inactive after transport

Experts,
In version 3.5, I have created an infospoke with transformation and unit tested in Dev box. After transport I have got an error 8 while importing in QA. I checked all objects if anything missing or inactive in dev box related with this transport. But could not find anything.
Looking into QA, I noticed infospoke was in revised version. Do you have any suggestions about what could be missing in transport? Or what should be the next possible steps to resolve the issue, please. Thanks.
Regards,
Nimesh
Message was edited by:
Nimesh Patel

Hi Anil, I am having the same problem. My ABAP routine puts the correct selection variables, but the infospoke is getting into 'Revised' version. Can you please let me know, if you have a fix for this?
Thanks,
Naveen

Wrong conversion of source system after transport

Hello,
We ve got a a transport problem in our 3-3 Landscape. Connections for extraction are only between same systems ( f.e. dev to dev)
BI Dev BI Test BI Prod
R3 Dev R3 Test R3 Prod
The conversion of source systems is on the BI test:
BI Dev becomes BI Test
R3 Dev becomes R3 Test
The conversion of source systems is on the BI Prod:
BI Test becomes BI Prod
R3 Test becomes R3 Prod.
With this it tells me the after transport (BI Test to BI Prod) of objects with source system assignement that the R3 Dev System is not known.
The transport before from the BI Dev to BI Test worked well without any problems.
We`ve got the BI Test and the BI DEV on the same host.
Has anybody got an idea what is wrong?
Thank you folks.

It must be R3D (dev system)
Something like following should be maintained in production
R3DCLNT100 <u>R3PCLNT100</u> [Assuming R3PCLNT100 is your production system]
Don't forget to assign points,
-jayant

After transporting changes are not happening

Hi All,
As per the requirement we need a change in the pricing procedure ZJEXPS
(Export Sales Switch). We made the changes in transaction code V/08.
But after transporting the request to quality server, changes are not reflecting there.
I had checked the request number all the tasks are there and transport was completed with warning.
our consultant created another request and then also after transporting changes are not reflecting.
How it is happening particular to this request?
How to trace this? Kindly suggest me.
(Ours is two system landscape with master client 009 and quality client 007.I am trying to transport to 007)
Regards,
Nagendra.

Hi
Check the import logs. If you are getting warnings that original objects cannot be replaced. You need to import the change request in unconditional mode. During performing imports select option, overwrite originals.
Some times the requests contain the objects, which are original to the target system, e.g SAP standard objects.
Check if this could help you.
Regards
Rahul

BPM error after transport

hi all,
i get the following error after transport on Q system:
"No object type found for this message; check the activation of the corresponding process"
the trace gives me this explanation:
"could not create BPE proxy for message, no XML object definition found for message 48C56A8CD7D615EEE10000000A9E014F"
In SXI_CACHE the business process has status zero, business process and everythng else in transport is active.
So what else can i do to fix that bug?
Thanks
Stefan

HI,
Then check the error log carefully. Problem might be some else. If not try to reimport the transport with the help of BASIS.
Also check the status of check table in quality. Is it active?
All ur objects are in single TR? If not the u have to move check table TR first and then later objects TR.
If nothing works then include all the objects in another TR and transport. make sure all are active.
Thanks,
Vinod.

ADOBE FM not exist after transport

Hi dears,
I'm facing to a problem with an adobe form transport.
In dev, adobe works fine. I've transported the adobe in acceptance, after the transport, I test the adobe.
Transaction sfp, test button.
So I reach the initial screen of FM module. The FM is called /1BCDWB/SM00000007 and when I execute it, I've a dump. It's say:
Short text
    The function module is not active or contains no code.
What happened?
    The function module "/1BCDWB/SM00000007" is called, but
    cannot be found in its function group.
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "/1BCDWB/SM00000007============FT" had to be
     terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
I know that with smartforms sometimes we need to regenerate the SF after transport with the option in the menu generate.
I go in form object menu Form Object (first one) and choose generate.
I've the information message (in green):
Unable to find include '/1BCDWB/LSM00000007U01
and the FM is not yet avaible
In dev this manipulation generate works fine but not needed.
Su53 in acceptance is ok last authorization wheck was successful and adobe in acceptance (the form and interface with sfp) are ok.
Any help is welcome
Thx in advance
Vincent

Hi Vincent,
Similar to SMARTFORMS in adobe forms also the FM have a different name in different systems.
So wherever you are writing the code to call your adobe form call FM: FP_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME and get the fm name from there, replace your FM /1BCDWB/SM00000007 with the variable in which you are getting your Forms FM name.
For example:
CALL FUNCTION 'FP_FUNCTION_MODULE_NAME'
    EXPORTING
      i_name     = <Your form name>
    IMPORTING
      e_funcname = lv_funcname.
CALL FUNCTION lv_funcname
    EXPORTING
      git_item       = git_item
      gs_header      = gs_header
    EXCEPTIONS
      usage_error    = 1
      system_error   = 2
      internal_error = 3
      OTHERS         = 4.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
            WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
ENDIF.
Regards,
Vaibhav

Inconsistent Filter in Integrated Planning - After Transport

Hello All,
After transporting all the relevant objects for IP...Aggregation Level, Filters, Planning Functions etc...from Dev to QA System. In the QA system when i check the fiter for consistency. I am getting an error "Variable 4EMAK1IX593GLMYGHHXIZCV8B not in query".
As such all the objects are transported properly. only issue is in the Filters.
Anybody faced any such error, please help.
Thanks and Regards,
Vikram

Hello,
Issue resolved....i searched for the 4EMAK1IX593GLMYGHHXIZCV8B in the table RSZGLOBV -- BEx Variables.
collected it in a new transport and imported..
Issue resolved.
For your information.
REgards,
Vikram

Deactivated objects after transport of Analytics Security Object

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for