Deactivation Fund Management

Dear Expert,
I have already deactivated the Fund management and uncheck the box related with my Company Code in OF16.
Still I am getting the following error while I am going to post any entry in FB50. F-53, etc
No commitment item entered in item 00001 WBST 1000015
Message no. FI311
Regards,
David

This problem is solved now

Similar Messages

Issue when activing Global Funds Management Function(PSM-FM)

Hi Peers,
I tried to active Global Funds Management Function(PSM-FM) in IMG. A message "Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt" poped up. And I also only have read access to Active/Deactive Funds Management but SU53 shows authorization check is ok.
What should I do for next? Thanks
Regards,
Eunice

Hi,
I am facing the same issue regarding "Read Access Only" to the activation of Funds Management under Actual and Commitment Update/Integration.
I've checked the component activation and found that
1) ES-PS is activated under SPRO
2) IS-PS is checked under BF11, but the checkbox status is greyed, so that it's impossible to change it.
I've tried to delete the IS-PS entry and re-insert it...the action was successful but the issue remained...
Any clues?
Thanks

Runtime Error due to activating Fund Management

Hi,
I had activated Funds Management in SAP. I started getting Run Time Errors. I deactivated the Fund Management. But still the Run Time Error is there. I am attaching the file for your reference.
I enquired with the Basis consultant who is telling this is a Functional problem, hence I need to solve this. I checked all the configurations, but could not find the exact problem.
Can anybody tell me how this can be resolved.
Note: This error is showing in Quality Server. There was a copying from Production to Quality.

In the error I see the statement before the dump comes is PERFORM exit--entry_from_table | | 1039| IN PROGRAM (-callback_report)
That sounds like an user exit from a table that is not there.
You say you had a copy from production. It could be that a user exit which was not implemented yet in production and therefore not in the exit table. is now also not present anymore in your Q system after the copy. Were there any changes about to go to production ?
Also in the dump I read the comment:
| 1063|* version and guid are used by strategy -> further params for generated | | 1064|* routines. guid is only used for reference purposes and not returned at | | 1065|* the moment
That could possibly mean that this is a generated program. Maybe you need to regenerate it.
I also see: STEP--METHOD_DRULE
That could mean that these have something to do with rules that have not been maintained.
You could ask a programmer to debug the program and see where SAP tries to get the rules and exit information from (which table) .
Maybe that give you a clue what is going wrong.
If you have a table name start SM30 and click customizing. If it opens a customizing transaction then that is where you need to maintain entries.

Funds Management-FMBV Run

Hi All,
Im doing Funds Managemnet Implementation.
Im in go live phase of implementation.All the configuration is moved to Production.Soon after the transport of configuration of Funds Management we had deactivated the FM throgh removing ticks in activate /deactivate button in SPRO to avoid errors in production.
Now i want suggestion that i have to run the transaction FMBV (restructuring budget).
So is there any effect if i will do before activating ?
Thanks
Deepa

closed

System error in Funds Management update

Dear you,
Have anyone seen the following when updating FM from FI document:
"System error:Funds management update (FMRI, CHECK_WE_RE)"
Any ideas what to do?
Thanks
Sonja

Hi there,
The update problem occurs both if we try to post with FB50L or if I try to make a transfer of FI postings in FM. This all happens in the new installation where we plan to use new GL and FM.
This note you gave did not ring a bell for me
The error message is FI057. But we have not yet found a suitable note.
Therefore any ideas are still welcomed.

Funds management cube getting data from 4 ods, data not seen in cube

Hello all,
I am working on funds management cubes (0PU_C02 and 0PU_C03). These two cubes get data from like 7 or 8 ODS. Can someone tell me which are the ODS which feed to respective cubes. I have the mappings done but i am getting very confused.
In the ods 0PU_O44 there is RLDNR for Ledger and I can see that data in ODS but when i run load to cube I dont see the ledger data (its direct mapping there are no routines or rules).
Is there any sequence with wihic we have to load the data?
Thanks
Message was edited by: Raj M

Hi Raj,
I was going thru the forums who has knowledge in Public sector when i came accross ur forum.Can i get your email id..i have some questions to ask regarding student administration.
thanks.

|Funds Management - relating to PR/PO

I am getting another error in Funds Management:
Posting date must be used for update of value type 000100 update profile 50
Message no. FI_E008
Diagnosis
FM areas with assignment to the update profile must have all their value types defined as 'posting date' on the ledger level when activating to period-based encumbrance tracking (PBET) on the ledger level.
Procedure
Find all the FM areas using the update profile in transaction 'OF37'.
Use transaction OF36 to ensure that all value types in the FM area(s) are using 'posting date' for the ledger that is being activated to PBET.

Hi,
It's what the system says. You have to ensure, that you don't overwrite profile 0100 in OF36 with other date, than posting date.
Regards,
Eli

Funds Management cut over of Open PR and PO

Hi,
In case of cutover, we are using following link to update FM account assignment in open PR/PO.
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Select Documents
and
SPRO>Funds Management Government>Actual and Commitment Update/Integration>Internal Data Transfer to Funds Management>Supplementary Account Assignment-->Convert Worklist
1) But in this case, for open PO of which GR is not done FMRP_RW_BUDCON report is not updated after doing above mentioned process. when I make GR, commitment get updated in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report. This does not show actual status of budget consumption as budget consumption is shown at the time of GR only.
2) If GR is already done for PO and after doing above mentioned process, if GR get reversed then Negetive commitment shows in FMRP_RW_BUDCON report and after deletion of that respected PO, commitment of PO gets zero. But negetive GR commitment remains open which leads to wrong status of budget consumption. e.g. GR of Rs 5000 is reversed. Then report shows two documents as -5000 for GR reversed and 5000 for PO commitment getting open. IF I reversed this PO then PO commitment of 5000 become zero. but GR reversing amount -5000 still remains open. So it shows less consumption of budget by Rs.5000.
Do I am missing any process. Suggest.

Hi,
Firstly, after you convert the open commitments, you'll need to run FMAVCREINIT to reconstruct AVC. FMRP_RW_BUDCON will then reflect the converted commitments.
Secondly, based on your posting, it seems that you do not want PO commitments (VT 51) to be counted as budget consumption. You can achieve this in the ledger 9H configuration:
Public sector management > Funds management government > BCS > Availability control > Settings for availability control ledger > Define filter settings for commitment/actual values. You will want to exclude both value type 50 and 51 from ledger 9H. After you change the setting, you will need to run FMAVCREINIT again.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ming

Error while Activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM)

Hi,
I am getting the below error while activating Activate Global Funds Management Functions (PSM-FM) in Funds Management.
Aktivierung des Haushaltsmanagements ist nicht erlaubt
Message no. ZZ003
Kindly help me in fix this issue....
Thanks
Kishore

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. But can you clarify me why we need to delete the row Z_LEAVE in SE11 for FMISPS table. Because here ABAPER is objecting to do this as they feel there may be some impact if we delete this.
Kindly clarify me
Thanks
Kishore

Error while settlement of WBS - Funds Management

Hi,
We have maintain derivation rule as - WBS to Fund Center. This Fund center is DUMMY because we need not want to control WBS through Funds Management.
There is always one Cost center in each WBS. while settling this WBS we are getting error as -
Asset ABC 000127000000 0000: no subnumber with FM assignment DUMMY / /
Message no. AW851
ABC - Company code
000127000000 - asset number
DUMMY - Fund center
suggest.

alex ice wrote:
Hi, 1 change FC in AS02 to dummy if it applicable.
> 2 Check note 618269 it applicable.
> 3 remove FC from asset master data
Hi Alex, how are u!?
I've got the same issue than Harsh Vaidya in my system ...
Ive already read this notes: [618269|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/618269] (no apply to me, because Joint Venture Accounting isn't active), [844262|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/844262], [1473357|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1473357], [446029|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/446029] and [440396|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/440396]
All very interesting notes :P
But... I couldn't find the solution
I try to TRACE from FMDERIVE too, but when I go to KO88, FMDERIVE's trace doesn't track anything.
Any help to throw some more light on this thread, would be very useful.
Thanks a lot!
Regards from Argentine.

After Funds Management activation we got error in travel managment

Hi All,
After activating funds management in the system, while creating a travel request we got the following error. Anyone can help on this, for idenifying the problem.
In the travel request portal we are getting this error :
" com.sap.tc.webdynpro.modelimpl.dynamicrfc.WDDynamicRFCExecuteException: No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE and No expense type for estimated costs has been defined. Cannot save , error key: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE "
regards,
Sabari Prabhu.

Hi
I have a question, I udnerstand in (Create one expense type "Estimated Costs") but my question is in using transaction
When you start using the trip transaction and select a travel request the system send you to the TP04 transaction... now
with this new function, I have to use the transaction PR05 its right? becouse the TP04 ask the VORS expense type, and sap says to dont delete record
Please could you tell me with wich transaction you start to create a travel request? I have the same problem of the screen but Im not sure to use the TP04 transaction wit this solution
Thanks a lot

Status of PO becomes F in fund management

Hi,
recently we have upgrade SAP from ECC6 to EHP4 and found some of the PO's Status becomes F in fund management, so we are not able to make service entry sheet and payment as system asking for further budget though actually POs value has not reduced fully.
Plz help to remove the status F from FM so that it can be able to make payment.
P K Sahoo

Hi, try to reconstract PO(I don't remember tcode, but you can find it in spro like M*4N)

PSM-FM-Reversal of funds management document after change in acc.assignment

Good day we recently went live with a component of Funds Management i.e. Availability Control on Cost centers and cost elements. We update BCS with the plan values and actual/commitment items in Finance/CO. We do our planning in CO.
The solution is working reasonably well but we have encountered a problem for which we are unable to find a solution. The problem is best illustrated with an example;
1. Create purchase requisition with Account Assignment Category "K" = Cost Center with transaction ME51N
2. Account assignment = cost center and cost element. A funds management document is created upon saving of the transaction.
3. Purchase Req. is released with a release strategy (transaction ME54N)
4. After purchase requisition release the account assignment for the cost element is changed by the user. This occurs sometimes during the execution of the business process.
5. When a purchase order is created with reference to this purchase requisition with transaction ME59N the system references the original funds management document which means when the account assignment was changed the funds management document was not reversed and a new funds management document created for the changed account assignment.
6. The BUDCON report transaction FMRP_RW_BUDCON thus displays the commitment under the incorrect commitment item as the change in account assignment is not reflected in Funds Management. We have a one to one relationship between cost elements/commitment items and cost centers/funds centers as per the derivation strategy.
My question is;
Is this normal standard SAP standard behavior or are we missing some configuration that will enable the creation of a new funds management document and if so where do we configure such? I must mention our solution is completely SAP standard.
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards
Mike Olwagen
Manager SAP Solution Support
City Power (JHB) (Pty) Ltd

Hi Mike, nice to meet you.
I think u should do an entire test with TRACE on, and u will find the problem, and how to fix it (at FMDERIVE of course).
First: Have a look at note [666322|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/666322], go to FMDERIVE and turn ON the trace.
Then, run all the process ... from ME51N to the end...
I agree with Eli, u must allow overwriting of existing values at FMDERIVE rule...
Regards,
Osvaldo.

Commitment Item in SD Billing document (Fund Managment) ECC6

Hi,
We are upgrading from 4.6C to ECC6 and have activated Fund Managment (EA-PS).
At the time of carrying out the Billing in SD we are getting a error that no commitment item available for gl account but if I use the same revenue account and create a FI invoice (FB70) then the CI is getting derived thru the derivation rules (Rule:CI from Cost Element).
I would like to know why the CI is not getting derived during Billing in SD module.
Thanks
SS

Hi,
Thanks for your message.
I have maintained a derivation Rule:CI from Cost Element, so that the CI will derive from this derivation rule.
As mentioned if I use same revenue account and create a FI invoice then the CI is derived as per the derivation rules but while carrying out the SD billing then the error comes.
Kindly clarify.
Regards
SS

GL account linkage with activity group for AVC- Funds management

Hi,
I have activated (BCS) funds management in my system. My client wants that system will give error message for some expense GL accounts and for other expense GL accounts it will only give information message.
For that i have created new activity group for AVC but i have no idea how we can link GL accounts with activity group for AVC.
Request immediate help.
Thanks in advance.
Manisha

Hi,
The correct way to deal with this is not with activity groups, but with tolerance profiles. Create tolerance profiles with error and warning messages accordingly and then create a tolerance derivation strategy, which on the basis of commitment item, will derive the relevant profile.
Regards,
Eli

Deactivation Fund Management

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for