Debug Message Flow

Hi Gurus
Can we Debug the entire Message flow or atleast part of message flow at RUNTIME in the Pipeline services in Integration Server.?
MAXIMUM POINTS WILL BE AWARDED
Regards
Bhasker

Hey,
In moni there are diff pipeline Steps.
Such as receiver determination, agreement mapping....etc.
You need to check whether your payload had passed through each step.
Xi will also provide you with the system errors like mapping failed, or read time out, or System fail.,...etc
Based on this you can locate the problem.
As far the application error is concerned its mainly the mapping.
In this case you need to copy the payload from moni and paste it in mapping in IR and test the mapping.
regards,
Milan

Similar Messages

Debugging - Process flow control

Hi All,
I am doing initial load for one condition object(R3AS), and when I check SMW01 I am getting BDoc validation Error.
I want to debug the BDoc flow context i.e MI0(validation function module) where Bdoc posting is failing.
I followed OSS note- 432661- Debugging and process support of flow control: Enhancement
Here is the Note:
Symptom
Error analysis requires debugging flow control services.
Other terms
SMW01, Flow Control, BDOC, BDoc, BDoc Message, Flow Service, Update task, qRFC step, asynchronous step
Reason and Prerequisites
Error analysis requires debugging flow control services.
Solution
This feature is available with CRM 3.0 starting SP04 and higher releases.
Usage:
     The flow header structure SMW3_FHD is extended to hold a flag indicating debug mode. To debug, set this flag before calling CL_SMW_MFLOW=> PROCESS_OUTBOUND (Parameter IN_HEADER, Field DBGMODE), PROCESS_NOTIFICATION (Parameter HEADER, Field DBGMODE) or PROCESS_NOTIFICATION_MULT (Parameter HEADER, Field DBGMODE). If update task and/or asynchronous tRFC/qRFC step is done, the message is not written into a qRFC queue or tRFC. Instead the message get's a new state 'D01': To be processed (Debug).
The message processing can then be continued from transaction SMW01.
     Select messages in state D01 possibly with bdoc type, send date, creation time, and user.
     In the list display check the message check box that you want to debug.
     Choose function Retry to process.
The message will be processed by flow service function modules in the order shown in transaction SMO8FD. Processing occurs directly. Therefore all active breakpoints can be used to stop processing for further analysis.
I set HEADER-DBGMODE = X, and passed this structure to CL_SMW_MFLOW=> PROCESS_OUTBOUND
But none of the message is set to D01. Anyone have idea where I am missing?
I basically want to debug this validation function module while Bdoc comes in CRM, Any other way other than this OSS note..?
Thanks,
Vijay Raheja

what the description of the error?
Give details. Just by saying bdoc validation error does not nelp.
Click on the error details icon and see wat it says.
let us know then only can we help
Julius

ISDN debug message

Can someone help me to analyze this debug message? My call flow is DID -> Cisco.
debug isdn events
Jul 14 14:35:29.229: ISDN Se0:23: Event: Received a VOICE call from 9179390834 on B3 at 64 Kb/s Tone Value 0
*Jul 14 14:35:29.233: ISDN Se0:23: process_disconnect(): call id 0x6387, call type is VOICE, b_idb 0x62296CDC, ces 1, cause Resource unavailable, unspecified(0x2F)
*Jul 14 14:35:29.233: ISDN Se0:23: CCPRI_ReleaseCall(): bchan 4, call id 0x6387, call type VOICE
*Jul 14 14:35:29.237: CCPRI_ReleaseChan released b_dsl 0 B_Chan 4
*Jul 14 14:35:29.237: ISDN Se0:23: LIF_EVENT: ces/callid 1/0x6387 CALL_CLEARED
*Jul 14 14:35:29.237: ISDN Se0:23: received CALL_CLEARED call_id 0x6387
thanks

Copy, we see the disconnect for call id 0x6387 with cause code 47(resource unavailable).
Check here:
http://cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5187/prod_troubleshooting_guide_chapter09186a00805584fa.html
Typical scenarios include:
?Out of memory
?Internal access to the TCP socket is unavailable
or out of DSP resources.
Hope this helps

BDOC message flow and its architecture

Hi Expert,
It can be a simple question but i have a doubt regarding the flow of messages using SAP CRM middleware.
The scenario is like:
1. Message flows from ECC to CRM through a BDoc. (It can be opposite way also)
2. The BDoc fails in CRM due to some data issue.
3. A BDoc message id is generated.
4.Now the data is corrected in ECC and initial load was triggered.
5.The messages are flowing correctly.
So my doubt is:
1.What will happen to the old BDoc?
2. Do the initial or delta load processes the messages with new BDoc ID or through the old BDoc ID?
3. If the messages are processed through new BDoc id, can the old BDocs be deleted?
Please help me understand this concepts of BDocs and please provide me to some study material to get more undertsanding of the BDOC message flow architecture.
thanks,
Vicky

Hello Vicky,
i think I understand exactly what your confusion is all about.
1.What will happen to the old BDoc?
The old Bdoc will remain in error state until it is archived or set to processed state.
2. Do the initial or delta load processes the messages with new BDoc ID or through the old BDoc ID?
It will be a separate BDoc with a new BDocId. If you get an Error in SMW01 this is beyond the queueing, so later Messages will not get queued behind your faulty bdoc. They will also not "update" your BDoc in any way. Later BDocs will Bypass a bdoc in error state and update your object in CRM if the error in data has been solved in ERP before. If the data error is not corrected, you will get a second failed bdoc.
3. If the messages are processed through new BDoc id, can the old BDocs be deleted?
Best practise for the Bdoc with error would be to set it to processed state. That way there is no way that Bdoc can be processed afterwards. The BDoc will then be archived with the next run.
Best regards,
Lutz

Goods Receipt in PO AND Message Flow Update in Inb. Delivery using WMMBXY

Dear All
This question is related to a previous one posted in:
Post Goods Receipt for Inbound Delivery using WHSCON IDoc
We have a stock transport order (PO) for which we create an inbound delivery. The despatch advice (EANCOM D96A DESADV) is sent to our logistics partner who returns the same EDI message with the received quantities (goods receipt).
Using the inbound IDoc WMMBID02.WMMBXY I have successfully posted the goods receipt for the original PO. However, the message flow in the delivery is not updated. When we post the goods receipt (transaction MIGO) in dialog for the delivery we see the GR in the message flow.
I have used the following values with the segments of WMMBID02.WMMBXY (SAP release = 4.6c):
E1MBXYH:
Reference = <number of delivery>
Transaction code = 'MIGO'
E1MBXYI:
Movement type = '101'
Purchasing doc. = <number of PO>
Item = <Item no. in PO>
Movement ind. = 'B'
I am not sure about the correct movement indicator but failed when using a value different from 'B':
The movement indicator is derived from the transaction code.
Permitted values:
'' Goods movement w/o reference
'B' Goods movement for purchase order
'F' Goods movement for production order
'L' Goods movement for delivery note
'K' Goods movement for kanban requirement (WM - internal only)
'O' Subsequent adjustment of "material-provided" consumption
'W' Subsequent adjustment of proportion/product unit material
QUESTION: Does anybody know if and how inbound WMMBID02.WMMBXY can be used for both the goods receipt in the purchase order AND the message flow in the inbound delivery?
Regards
Uwe

Hello Everybody
My initial mapping of the WMMBXY IDoc proved to be correct.
For more details please refer to:
[Note 833603 - EDI: Goods receipt for stock transport order|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/833603]
Regards
Uwe

ON PREM Outbound emails showing in dummy non-configured office 365 account message flow trace

Dear Community,
We have an on-prem exchange 2013 server and an office 365 account which is completly standalone.
Whilst the office 365 account is standalone, it does feature the email address we use for on-prem (Ie. the domain name in office 365 account is not active for any office 365 services however has passed ownership verification thus it's just sitting there)
We DON'T use EOP nor do we have any connector rules on our on-prem system that go to office 365 however when I randomly went into the 'Message Flow Trace' section in our office 365 account, there is recorded outbound mail which was sent from our On-prem
server.
The ONLY mail that was recorded in the message Trace in Office 365 was emails we had sent from On-prem to other office 365 accounts (For example btconnect.com, and some of our clients whom also use office 365) .
How is office 365 picking up mail we've sent from our On-Prem server? Is there integration out of the box in exchange 2013 which auto interfaces with office 365? What on earth has happened here?
I'm really confused.
-------- For troubleshooting purposes...
Headers in the email which arrived in my personal office 365 account from the ON-PREM SERVER
Received: from AMSPR05MB065.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.89.142) by
DBXPR05MB079.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.138.22) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.93.16 via Mailbox Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:16:31
+0000
Received: from DBXPR05CA0014.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.178.14) by
AMSPR05MB065.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.89.142) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.14; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:16:30 +0000
Received: from DB3FFO11FD028.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7e04::145) by
DBXPR05CA0014.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:9434::14) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.106.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015
16:16:29 +0000
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (157.56.112.128)
by DB3FFO11FD028.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.47.217.59) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.6 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015
16:16:28 +0000
Received: from DB4PR04CA0010.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (25.160.41.20) by
DB3PR04MB236.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.242.130.24) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.14; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:16:26 +0000
Received: from DB3FFO11FD040.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7e04::184) by
DB4PR04CA0010.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:9852::20) with Microsoft
SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.106.15 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015
16:16:26 +0000
Received: from mail.localdomainhere (<IP OF OUR ON-PREM SERVER GOES HERE>) by
DB3FFO11FD040.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.47.217.71) with Microsoft SMTP
Server (TLS) id 15.1.99.6 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:16:25
+0000
Received: from INT-EX-01.localdomainhere (192.168.142.20) by
INT-EX-01.localdomainhere (192.168.142.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id
15.0.913.22; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:15:55 +0000
Received: from INT-EX-01.localdomainhere ([fe80::aca4:88cf:3eaf:57dc]) by
INT-EX-01.localdomainhere ([fe80::aca4:88cf:3eaf:57dc%12]) with mapi id
15.00.0913.011; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:15:55 +0000
From: Jake Ives <[email protected]>
To: Jake Ives <[email protected]>
Subject: Test01
Thread-Topic: Test01
Thread-Index: AdBXX6dyI5u99OGoSKmXroKKyMA3Tg==
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:15:54 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-US, en-GB
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.142.73]
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="_004_081f834d85b7436193fa887613b9dac7INTEX01localdomainhere_";
type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Return-Path:
[email protected]
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 1
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of domain.com
designates <IP OF ONPREM SERVER HERE> as permitted sender)
receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=<IP OF OUR ON-PREM SERVER GOES HERE;
helo=mail.domain.co.uk;
Authentication-Results: spf=pass (sender IP is <IP OF OUR ON-PREM SERVER GOES HERE>)
[email protected]; ives.gb.net; dkim=none (message not
signed) header.d=none;ives.gb.net; dkim=none (message not signed)
header.d=none;ives.gb.net; dmarc=none action=none header.from=domain.com;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:<IP OF ON PREM SERVER HERE>;CTRY:GB;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;BMV:0;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(438002)(189002)(199003)(71364002)(87936001)(2656002)(98436002)(92726002)(102836002)(108616004)(19625215002)(19618635001)(512954002)(92566002)(229853001)(107886001)(66926002)(18206015028)(84326002)(16796002)(19300405004)(450100001)(19580395003)(2900100001)(77156002)(15974865002)(62966003)(5250100002)(5310100001)(99936001)(15395725005)(16236675004)(110136001)(17760045003)(67866002)(86362001)(19617315012)(19627595001)(15975445007)(19580405001)(54356999)(22756005)(50986999)(6806004)(46102003)(74482002)(106466001)(33646002)(7099025)(24736002)(15669805003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:DB3PR04MB236;H:mail.domain.co.uk;FPR:;SPF:Pass;MLV:ovrnspm;MX:1;A:1;PTR:mail.domain.co.uk;LANG:en;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB3PR04MB236;UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMSPR05MB065;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <[email protected]outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5001007)(5005006);SRVR:DB3PR04MB236;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DB3PR04MB236;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004);SRVR:AMSPR05MB065;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AMSPR05MB065;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 05066DEDBB
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB3PR04MB236
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-MessageDirectionality: Incoming
Received-SPF: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of domain.com does not
designate 157.56.112.128 as permitted sender)
receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=157.56.112.128;
helo=emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com;
Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 157.56.112.128)
[email protected];
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.112.128;CTRY:US;IPV:NLI;IPV:NLI;EFV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(339900001)(489007)(189002)(71364002)(199003)(102836002)(92726002)(15975445007)(92566002)(17760045003)(62966003)(106466001)(15395725005)(16236675004)(77156002)(110136001)(107886001)(450100001)(5310100001)(229853001)(22756005)(98436002)(2900100001)(5250100002)(19625215002)(66926002)(99936001)(33646002)(15974865002)(19617315012)(19627595001)(67866002)(54356999)(108616004)(19300405004)(19618635001)(87836001)(2656002)(18206015028)(85426001)(512954002)(86362001)(6806004)(46102003)(74482002)(84326002)(19580395003)(50986999)(19580405001)(7099025)(24736002)(15669805003);DIR:INB;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:AMSPR05MB065;H:emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:Fail;MLV:ovrnspm;MX:1;A:1;PTR:mail-am1on0128.outbound.protection.outlook.com;LANG:en;
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStripped: DB3FFO11FD028.protection.gbl
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersPromoted: DB3FFO11FD028.protection.gbl
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-Network-Message-Id: 927151e3-02c4-4c46-5539-08d22576df82
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AVStamp-Service: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: 1
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2015 16:16:28.9728
(UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: cd52bfe2-da2e-446d-b8f1-e78db861d489
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=bfa61dad-1543-4f3b-8075-03498e9f4fcb;Ip=[IP OF ON PREM SERVER HERE]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AMSPR05MB065
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthSource: DB3FFO11FD028.protection.gbl
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-EndToEndLatency: 00:00:03.5565465

MX records are not set to office 365, the MX is pointing directly to the on-prem exchange server.
The problem is; Office 365 Mail Delivery Trace is displaying mail we've sent via our On-Prem server - We are having trouble understanding why this is happening.
To clarify, the message tracer in Office 365 is displaying outbound mail (Which for example, a user has sent out from their outlook) BUT only outbound mail which is being sent to other office 365 users.
We do not have mail on office 365, only on-premise hence the reason why we are flabbergasted to why the mail we are sending out would be displaying on the office 365 message tracer.
To further clarify, we are only seeing addresses in the office 365 message trace which belong to recipients whom use office 365 for their mail.
Hope this makes sense.
getting messy O365 users to another O365 you mean?
You mentioned if they send email using their MS Outlook Client.
I'd suggest you to send another email to the same recipient but using OWA
There may have been an office 365 connector in Outlook.
Where Technology Meets Talent

Is there an easy way to suppress debug messages from plugin.jar?

When using the plugin.jar library (included in JRE 1.4.2 and 1.5)
my Java Console is riddled with tons of debug messages like:
<<< ProxyClassLoader: defined LiveConnectProxy class. >>>
<<< Here're the permissions you've got: >>>
<<< java.security.Permissions@b614d0 (
(java.net.SocketPermission 127.0.0.1 connect,accept,resolve)
)I'm using the plugin.jar (replacing use of the old netscape.jar)
to bridge communication between Java Applets and JavaScript.
Each time the Applet calls back to the JavaScript side,
the callback JavaScript function makes a call to parseInt() to
convert one of the parameters passed from a string to an integer.
Each time parseInt() is called, the message above appears
in the Java Console.
I traced down the source code for this message to a debug()
statement inside the plugin.jar's class loader, but I'm not sure
how to suppress it easily.
Does anyone have any ideas I could try?
Here's the code from the Java-side:
synchronized( this )
     try
          final JSObject window = JSObject.getWindow( applet );
          if( window != null )
               final String[] stringArgs = new String[3];
               stringArgs[0] = labelName;
               stringArgs[1] = labelDisplayName;
               stringArgs[2] = labelValue;
               log.debug(stringArgs[0]);
               log.debug(stringArgs[1]);
               log.debug(stringArgs[2]);
               window.call("MyJavascriptCallback", stringArgs);
          else
               log.error("Javascript window unavailable.");
     catch( final JSException e )
          // Note: Occasionally, getWindow() will throw an exception
          // without any meaningful reason.
          // ( http://www.raditha.com/blog/archives/000938.html )
          // Possible cause: This can send updates at a fraction of a
          // second. This may be causing issues within the Plugin.jar
          // used to handle the JavaScript callback.
          log.debug("JSException", e);
}

Here's what I've found out...
The messages are coming from the MRJPlugin.jar provided by Firefox.
Within the netscape.oji.ProxyClassLoaderFactory class,
the following line...
System.out.println("<<< " + message + " >>>");
...appears to be the cause and cannot be turned off by a configuration setting.
The home URL for the MRJPlugin.jar is:
http://www.mozilla.org/oji/MRJPlugin.html
The last time this library had an update released was in 10/31/2000.
However, this is the Mozilla source; not Firefox.
Although changing the MRJPlugin.jar source to remove this line will appear
to fix the problem, I'm not sure of the best way to distribute the updated
MRJPlugin.jar without conflicting with Firefox's update process.
Any thoughts?

Debug messages in Stored Procedure

is it possible to see the debug messages written in the Stored Procedure when invoking it from WLS.
using wls 8.1 SP3
DB :Sybase
Driver : weblogic.jdbc.sybase.SybaseDriver
setting debug parameters (
-Dweblogic.Debug=weblogic.JDBCConn,weblogic.JDBCSQL,weblogic.JTAJDBC
)is not enough. also using P6Spy does not help here ...

Yuval Avni wrote:
is it possible to see the debug messages written in the Stored Procedure when invoking it from WLS.
using wls 8.1 SP3
DB :Sybase
Driver : weblogic.jdbc.sybase.SybaseDriver
setting debug parameters (
-Dweblogic.Debug=weblogic.JDBCConn,weblogic.JDBCSQL,weblogic.JTAJDBC
)is not enough. also using P6Spy does not help here ...Hi. If/when Sybase sends informational messages to the client, a driver will typically
make them available from the statement or connection or even result set via SQLWarnings.
Try the getWarnings() methods of those objects.
Joe

Xslt in message flow

hello,
i have an XSLT document and i want to use it to make a transformation in the response message flow of my proxy service.
i call a webservice through business service but i dont know which action,in the "response actions", corresponds to making an XSL transformation.
I tried "replace" without success, the others actions seem not to be for transformation.
in the xquery expression editor, i put my XSLT resource to execute.
in "2. bind input", i dont know exactly what to put, there isn't any explication for "2. bind input" in the edocs.
and for "3. bind variables", i have nothing (no variables have been found)
could someone indicate me how to configure and use the result of my xslt in a message flow ?
thank you very much.

We built a custom service and invoked it asynchronously (non-blocking) using the Publish Action (with QoS as BestEffort) in the different places wherever we needed the audit functionality.
And this service would do its work on the background as a part of a separate thread, thereby not impacting the actual service that was implementing the business logic.
This is not optimal because there is still some time consumed for the publish action (though it is less) in the actual service with the business logic. But atleast this did allow us to overcome the limitation of the handlers to some extent.
I generally do not prefer to use java callouts as the prerequisite is that the methods exposed need to be static, which might create some contention when many threads try to invoke the same java callout methods at the same time.
Thanks,
Patrick

Replacing default namespace in OSB message flow

I'm in the process of setting up a simple OSB proxy and could use some help figuring out how to change a default namespace in the response from the business service.
The proxy and business service use different namespaces which we'll call "http://foo.com/namespace/proxy" and "http://foo.com/namespace/business". In my routing request message flow, the contents of $body look like this and I'm able to use a Rename action with XQuery expression "./sof:*" to change "http://foo.com/namespace/proxy" to "http://foo.com/namespace/business":
<sof:Execute xmlns:sof="http://foo.com/namespace/proxy">
<sof:adminName>MyAdaptor</sof:adminName>
<sof:request>
[escaped payload omitted]
</sof:request>
</sof:Execute>
This works fine, but in the response message flow, I need to revert the namespace and am having difficulty because the response uses a default namespace instead of using a prefix:
<ExecuteResponse xmlns="http://foo.com/namespace/business">
<ExecuteResult>
[escaped payload omitted]
</ExecuteResult>
</ExecuteResponse>
If I define a prefix P2L in the expression editor to correspond to "http://foo.com/namespace/business", I'm able to reference the ExecuteResponse element as "./P2L:ExecuteResponse", but then I get stuck.
If I try use a Rename action to change the namespace for "./P2L:*", only the ExecuteResponse element is renamed to <sof:ExecutResponse xmlns:sof="http://foo.com/namespace/proxy">. Upstream in the calling application, there's an XML stream reader exception because (I assume) ExecuteResult is not found and parsed.
I also tried using a Replace action against "./P2L:ExecuteResponse/@xmlns" to replace its contents with "http://foo.com/namespace/proxy". I also tried "./P2L:ExecuteResponse/@P2L:xmlns". Neither worked.
Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong, or suggest a different approach? Assume that changing the calling application or business service is not an option.
Thanks!

>
If I define a prefix P2L in the expression editor to correspond to "http://foo.com/namespace/business", I'm able to reference the ExecuteResponse element as "./P2L:ExecuteResponse", but then I get stuck.
If I try use a Rename action to change the namespace for "./P2L:*", only the ExecuteResponse element is renamed to <sof:ExecutResponse xmlns:sof="http://foo.com/namespace/proxy">. Upstream in the calling application, there's an XML stream reader exception because (I assume) ExecuteResult is not found and parsed.
>
You pattern "./P2L:\*" matches just one element so it's ok that the payload's namespace wasn't touched. If you want to rename namespace for all elements try "//P2L:*". However, I'm not sure whether this is what you want. Try do describe what you do, what you want and what you get instead.
>
I also tried using a Replace action against "./P2L:ExecuteResponse/@xmlns" to replace its contents with "http://foo.com/namespace/proxy". I also tried "./P2L:ExecuteResponse/@P2L:xmlns". Neither worked.
>
I think it's not a good approach to replace content of xmlns as this attribute is not a common xml attribute.

BPM Message Flow

Hello,
I am aware that we use concept of Message Flows for communication between activities in two different pools.
Now let me say i have 5 activities and Pool A and 5 in Pool B. Now message flow is generic in between pools. How do i define that one message flow is for one specific activity.
I am new to BPM and may sound stupid too. But how does the above thing work? Guys help me out.

Hi Yogesh,
In SAP NetWeaver BPM on CE 7.11 only one so called active pool is supported. Other pools are for documentation purposes (in ordeer to outline the context the process is running in).
In case the other 4 activities should also particiapte in the process it would be necessary to split the pools into several lanes in order to define different responsibilities.
Hope that helps,
Martin

Loop in message flow found

Hi all
I created a idoc to abap proxy for the xi adapter i used http destination with my destination defined in sm59.
In sxbm_moni i get the error:
LOOP_IN_MESSAGE_ROUTING
Loop in message flow found: system is.00.metsapxd, pipeline CENTRAL with inbound adapter XI already processed
Anyone know how to fix the error?
Thx

Hi,
I think your end business system i.e. where proxy exists -- this application system is configured as "integration engine/HUB". Try to keep it as (SXMB_ADM -> Integration engine configuration) type of business system as "applicaiton system" instead of integration engine/server.
Regards,
Rao.Mallikarjuna

How to return "HTTP/1.0 401 Authorization Required" from OSB's Message Flow

How can I return "HTTP/1.0 401 Authorization Required" header from OSB's Message Flow?
Using of "HTTP Transport -> Authentification" is not possible, because I need flow condition. Transports Headers activity from design palette doesn't allow to send such headers.
Practical usage: request for kerberos ticket by sending two headers: 401 and WWW-Authenticate: Negotiate...

Can you briefly expand the use case for better understanding?
HTTP Client---> Hand Shakes or what ever ----> HTTP Proxy (OSB )---> Pipeline----
Philosophy behind pipeline is that it is designed to work on the request. Correct me if I'm wrong.
What you are asking is ability to control the hand shake either in Pipeline or some way during proxy configuration. Unfortunately there is no configuration that is exposed for HTTP proxies in OSB to control that behavior.
Manoj

Where to find detail message flow in scenario of AQ to DB adapter?

I have installed hub, aq and DB adapter. The repository, adapters seem to be run fine. I put some messages in AQ and found out that there were no messages appeared in DB. The messages could be found in AQ_OUTBOUND_QUEUE. Sine there is no error message in adapter log files(trace is turned on), I am not sure it's the hub problem or adapter problems. Where should i check the message flow so to decide the problem?
Any constructive advice is welcome.

Hi Johnson,
Have you set the queue to the event in the deploy tab of AQ application in iStudio? If not then please set your OUTBOUND_QUEUE to the corresponding event and then do push metadata after starting the adapter. You can have a look at "Appendix A -> Deployment -> Setting Queues" of Interconnect User guide for this.
regards,
Sandeep

Need help for the message flow in sap xi system?

Hello All,
My requirement is some wat different............in the existing production system the message flow is 3500 per hour......... now we want to develop new scenario and the message flow will be 8500 message per hour.
Client is not giving me the system details ...like network details and i need to say that can we send 8500 messages in the existing system with out changing the process speed or data base.
also please advice the best ways to increase the performance in the sap xi system when the message flow is huge.
thanks in advace.
Thanks and Regards,
chinna

>
chinnasapxi wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> My requirement is some wat different............in the existing production system the message flow is 3500 per hour......... now we want to develop new scenario and the message flow will be 8500 message per hour.
> chinna
3500 to 8500 is not a message count tht needs to be worried about
but to be on the safer side what is the average size of a single message?
if the size is not a significant one u can go ahead

Debug Message Flow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for