Decoupled scenario small clarification

Hi SRM Gurus,
We are now using the Stand-Alone scenario and now we want to go for Extended Classic scenario for certain Product categories. In this regard I have one doubt which is mentioned below.
Can we go with local product categories for ECS scenario or not?
And also please give me some pointers for this scenario.
Award the points.
Regards,
Ram

check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/0a/baf73a93ad9179e10000000a114084/content.htm
you can use local categories for ECS
BR
Dinesh

Similar Messages

Small clarification of Opening balance.

Hi SDN Experts,
i want small clarification. regarding my report, my report is displaying Opening Balance, Line Items and Closing balance for given GL accounts, comp code and posting date..
my problem is it is working good, for those GL accounts having Line Items, but problem its not displaying O.bal for GL accounts those are not having Line Items.
but my requirement is i want print all given GL accounts with 0.00 line Items for those r not having Line Items.
plz anyone can help ,
Thanks & Regards,
sudharsan.

Hi Anji Reddy Thanks for ur quick replay,
in my report am using, GLT0 for O.balance and BKPF , BSEG for Line Items.
Regards,
sudharsan.

Decoupled scenario

Hi All,
I know that decoupled scenario means any combination of classic, extended classic and standalone scenario.
My client is using extended classic scenario, but now require to create Import Purchase Orders as classic scenario.
Could you give me steps to create from a shopping cart a purchase order as classic scenario.
Thanks in advance,
Martí

Hi Martin,
Still if you didnt get the answer , then here is the information for you.
you can use the BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI for your requirement.
Following are the useful links
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI
Classic to Extended Classic
Best Regards,
Srini

Decoupled scenario and HR

Hi ppl,
I have a couple of questions:
a.]Can someone give me a real time eample of why a company will undertake a decoupled scenario?Why have the burden of maintaing records in two systems(back-end and SRM)?
b.]During HR replication:when we replicate users from back end to SRM, how does the replicated user atatch itself to the SU01 user id created in SRM?Do we maintain any attribute in the organization?What if there is no SU01 user id created in SRM?
Please share your views!
Jack

Hello,
a. Decoupled is good if you want to completely separate processes for different materials. That does not mean maintenance of records in two but only in respective system. Also, SRM can be used without material master records, only catalog entries are necessary. Those you must produce anyway. We are using classic scenario just for some materials but I think that decoupled will be better. By my opinion, if you are planning to switch all procurement to SRM decoupled is better start. Anyhow you can define scenario on product category.
b. System is responsible to attach users to positions. You need to maintain infotype 0105 subtype 0001 in HR system to enable this. This is only way.
As for replication without SU01 user in table T77S0 there is switch HRALX/USRAC . If you set this switch to "X" relationships are created without user existence. I do not know you release but note 550055 is a good start. In it you will find links to other relevant notes describing thing in more detail.
HTH
Gordan

Bid decoupled scenario

Hi all,
We are running SRM 7.01 and using the Bid Decoupled Scenario.
We create the RFX in SRM and send it to the Supplier Portal (SUS). We have checked in the SXI_MONITOR and goes out SRM and enters SUS without any error.
Where can I see the RFX in SUS? There isn´t any object type (BUSxxxx) to see it in BBP_PD.
Thanks
Ezequiel

Hi Sam,
you are right, there are errors in the inbond monitor in SUS side.
In /n/sappo/ppo2 transaction there are two errors messages related to the RFX we are transferring:
1-Partner 0000602461 not found
2-Partner 0000000101 not found with partner function type Bidder
Error 1: Partner 0000602461 not found:
This is the Business Partner of the Purchaser in SRM. Do we have to transfer, replicate or create purchasers in SUS?
Error 2: Partner 0000000101 not found with partner function type Bidder
This Business Partner is the contact person for the vendor 3000062 in SUS. We have created it in BP as Bidder but still same error occurs.
Thanks for your help
Ezequiel

Decoupled Scenario Error

Hi Gurus,
I have active a Classic Scenario and I´m trying to create in Standalone scenario the SC for 1 specific Product category.
Already configure the Product Category as local.
Although when I try to create the shopping cart I get an error of the Company Code and close the window.
Please let me know the config. I missing.
Currently using SRM 7.0
Regards.

Hello,
In order to have decoupled scenario active, badi BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI should be used to flag PO as local or not.
Regards,
Ricardo

Small Clarification

Hi all,
I need a basic clarification.There are many datasources in R/3 (ECC) which has to be replicated as
3.5 infosurces and we need to modify transfer rules and update rules.
There are some datasources where we can use them as 7.0 datasources and transaformations needs to be used.
Please explain which datasources are still 3.5 and which are available as 7.0
Is there any specific procedure to follow
Thanks

Hi Pallavi,
Once you changed SAPGUI version, Basically there are two types of data source avaliable, those are,
1). Emulated data source ( called as 3.x data source)
2). Data source ( 7.x data source )
These two we can idetified easly based small rectangle box. If you observe closely, If you find any small rectangle box on left side of data source which means this is 3.x data source. otherwise that is 7.x data source.
Any clarifications most welcome.
If u r problem solved, assign points.
Thanks & Regards,
Kotresh

SAP Based Scenario : Need clarification

Hello i am planning to implement a scenario which is based on SAP predifined componenets , with most of things already defined by SAP i would like to add some more configuration to complete this.
Now with info, i know that its not supposed to alter the SWCV's already defined by SAP. i got to know about referring these through another SWVC ; how to do this ?
Krishna

Hi Krishna,
You are right that you should not alter SWCVs delivered by SAP.
What you can do is define custom Sotware Components and Software Component Versions (along with custom Products and Product versions) in the SLD. Then import these SWCVs into the Integration Repository.
Refer to the following links for more information:
Software Components and Software Products
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/29/17647d028113439108ce1161263b6e/frameset.htm
Software Component Versions
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed903cf6c4492ce10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Maintaining Third-Party Products
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/0e/9c9d0c144a8942aa6a39879f8064fb/frameset.htm
Cheers
Manish

Small clarification how to do

hellow experts,
i have one small doubt.
we have table p0580, in that we have one field with data type as currency.now i want to display it as value of type Character.
Is it possible or not.
Pls clarify my doubt.
with regards
babu.

hai,
my cod is like this
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_wage,
         lgart TYPE t512t-lgart,
         lgtxt TYPE t512t-lgtxt,
         betrg TYPE ansal_15,
         END OF ty_wage.
data :wa_wage TYPE ty_wage.
CONCATENATE '|' wa_wage-lgtxt '            |' wa_wage-betrg INTO it_output.
        APPEND it_output.
and it gives error like this.........
wa_wage-betrg must be character-type data object.
i did all this in Function Module
points will be rewarded
with regards
babu

A small clarification in Exception handling

Please find the simpe program given below on Exception handling I have asked my query at the end of the program
This program is about throwing a user defined exception when Command line arguments satisfieds one of the checked conditions. Thanks in advance:
class myexcep extends Exception
class exception
public static void main(String arg[])
try
for(j = arg.length-1;j>=0;j--)
checkfood(arg[j]);
catch(myexcep e1)
System.out.println("Exception " +e1);
System.out.println("I dont like this ifood");
e1.printStackTrace();
public static void checkfood(String a) throws myexcep
if (a.equals("Pizza") | a.equals("Brocolli") | a.equals("Pasta"))
throw new myexcep();
System.out.println("I like this food " +a);
The program complies and runs succesfully. After compilation if I give
c:> java exception cabbage Pizza sub
3rd and 2nd arguments are evaluated sucessfully and a exception is thrown, when argument "Pizza" is encountered which is succesfully caught by catch block. SO program ends there without even looking at my first argument cabbage.
Can anyone give me a suggestion as of how to evaluate String "cabbage".

Swtich the for and the try ... like this:
    for(int j = arg.length-1;j>=0;j--) {
      try {
        checkfood(arg[j]);
      } catch(myexcep e1) {
        System.out.println("Exception " +e1);
        System.out.println("I dont like this ifood");
        e1.printStackTrace();
    }

Small clarification on BAPI_PO_CHANGE

Dear Experts,
The problem i am facing is BAPI_PO_Change is calling outputtype. I need to find out where it is calling this.
Can u please help me on this.
I am debugging the program but it seems its a lenghty process.Can u help me in this.
Please.
Regards.
VM.

Dear Vasantha,
I don't think so in this BAPI output type is being called or so . You need to maintain the partner profiles as Vendor and pass the same in the structure BAPIMEPOADDRVENDOR , field being COMM_TYPE as the communication type or the output medium. I hope this would help you .
Regards
Abhishek

Small Clarification in Tax Code

Hi Friends,
I got a Tax Code For a material from the purchase order (EKPO-MWSKZ).
Pls help me how to differentiate that Tax Code whether it is a inventory Tax Code or Availment Tax Code.
with Regards,
Kumaresh

U can try and read table T007A for the particular TAX Code...there is field for Tax Type.

FPN : A small clarification

Dear all,
I have set up FPN between CE 7.1 (Producer) and EP 7.0 (Consumer SP 12). Both were having same user store.
Now I want to set up another FPN between BI Portal(Producer, EP 7.0 SP16) and EP (Consumer, SP12).
But the portals are having different user stores. Consumer portal doesn't have all the user id's which exist in the Producer Portal. But the id's will be same if a user has id in both the portals.
Can I set up FPN successfully with this constraint? Please provide your valuable suggestions.
Best Regards,
Aparnna

Hello Aparna,
Kindly acess thease links they will surely help u out.
[FPN|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/5b/9f2d4293825333e10000000a155106/frameset.htm]
[limitetation|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/5b/9f2d4293825333e10000000a155106/frameset.htm]
SAP Note 880482
In this note search for ur Limitation .
Hope this help's
Regards.
Soni Vinit

A small clarification in Scripts

See observe the follwing text which i wrote in a window.
1.&v_var1& &v_var2&
i have 3spaces between them.
2.&v_var1& &v_var2&
Now there 6spaces between them.
The output varies from 1 to 3 interms of providing space at time of printing ( Not preview ,actual print on paper ) .
Your help is appreciated.
Message was edited by: raja gurrala
Message was edited by: raja gurrala

Hi
I can't see the space between the variables, anyway you want to define different distancen at runtime, don't you?
You can't use any variables to decide dynamically the long of the space, so you can insert several lines and you'll decide which line should ve used by IF statament:
/: IF ........
AS &v_var1&,,&v_var2&
/: ELSE
AS &v_var1&,,,,&v_var2&
/: ENDIF.
The sign ,, means TAB: every tab is long 3 char. You have to define the tabs in paragraph section.
Max

Enhancing standard datasource, small clarification.

I have gone thru Robert's blog it says
*"One method of adding user-defined fields is the following: add the required fields to the communication structures (MCVBAK, MCVBAP and so on ) using the append method (via SE11) and then use the LIS customer exits to fill the field.
For information on enhancing the communication structures, you can see the documentation for the enhancements MCS10001, MCS50001 and MCS60001 provided in transaction SMOD.
After you enhance the communication structures you can then enhance the extract structure with the relevant field in the customizing cockpit (transaction LBWE), provided that the communication structure is available in the selection. Then you can proceed with the steps described before in the previous bullet."*
See if in one DS 2LIS_11_VASCL he want to add a field AUDAT and my doubt is how can he add that field to the communication structure so that he can select it from that DS communication structure to the left side, Is it possible can we add what ever fields to the communication structure. I thought we should append the datasource and then enhance the respective function exit rite. Why are we talking about append method via SE11, can anyone please guide what do we mean by appending it throug se11 to the communication structure. What i know is if we do not find the required filed in any standard ds we can append the ds and edit the related include program or use 2 DS's to get the required fields to a single cube on BI side after activating those fields if we know those field names. What is the concept of adding fields to the communication strucute using append method via SE11. Please guide me in detail. Thanks in advance.

HI,
I havent seen the blog but initially I guess you are confusing extract structure in R/3 with the communication structure in BW.
MCVBAK and MCVBAP etc. are not exactly extract structure for the data source its a communication structure for the tables which will be used to extract data from the VBAK and VBAP and can be used by anyone.
A data source can be based on more then one tables and therefore may use more then one structure based on this table.This can combine MCVBAK and MCVBAP and many more structure together.
This is the extract structure you see in LBWE for a particular data source.
I think to differentiate between these two type structure he would have used the term communication structure and through these structure the extract queue communicates with the tables.
I guess In 3.5 the point was of giving the look of BW flow same as r/3 for better understanding.
So one communication structure can be updated by many transfer rules in BW..similary one extract structure can be updated with many rules or structure below it in R/3.
Dont confuse it with the communication structure in the BW.
You cannot do any thing related to communication structure in BW in CMOD.
Thanks
Ajeet

Decoupled scenario small clarification

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for