Decreased performance with CoreCenter 1.6.2.0
I just recently upgraded CoreCenter from 1.6.0.0 to 1.6.2.0. I had no problems with the original, but decided it was time to upgrade. I noticed right away that my voltages were now being reported differently, closer to what they should be. However, since installing the new version, I noticed that Outlook Express runs slower and I consistently get .75 FPS slower in Aquamark 3. This is not a big deal, but it still shouldn't happen. With v1.6.0.0 running in the background with C 'n Q enabled, I always got 31.25 or 31.26 FPS (at least 10 different runs). With v1.6.2.0, I always get 30.54 or 30.55 FPS (4 runs) and I notice hesitations at several points throughout the benchmark. I tried closing down Corecenter and got 31.26 FPS with no hesitation. Also, I have noticed when the computer is sitting idle, the frequency in CoreCenter keeps bouncing around. This tells me that CoreCenter is definitely the problem. This did not happen with v1.6.0.0. I have tried several reboots and I have even uninstalled CoreCenter and re-installed it with LiveUpdate. Does anyone else have this same problem? I always like to keep CoreCenter running, but it looks like I can't anymore. I would re-install v1.6.0.0, but since I used LiveUpdate, it's gone. Does anyone out there have a copy of v1.6.0.0, or better yet, a solution?
i've noticed with the new core center that the fan speed will randomly rise (to an audible level) even when CnQ is keeping the cpu at 800mhz. The only way to slow the fan down again is to close core center and start it again. The settings I use haven't canged, the only cause could be the new core center software.
I haven't updated to the 1.4 bios but I'm about to do that so if things change i'll post back here.
Similar Messages
-
Decreased performance with every 'upgrade'
I use Reader in a corporate environment and of course, at home.
This morning here at work I was prompted to install the latest and greates upgrade to what I presume is the free version or Reader X.
It suggested re-booting after installatin and I complied.
Now I open pdf's that 2 years ago would open in a heartbeat and I could literally fly through to find the informaiton I need. Now they open horribly slow and browsing through them is like watching spagetti sauce run down a wall ...at least for the first couple of minutes ...after which it appears all the indexing is done (for the 200th time on that document) and it finally starts to work.
This is a corporate environment and this increasingly poor performance is costing corporations a lot of money. If I as one user, spend 10 extra minutes per day due to this ...can you imagine the overall cost to corporations globally?? This is nuts Adobe. You are eroding the profit margins of the very corporations that facilitate your existence. Please go back to the drawing board. This isn't new. Each and every 'upgrade' since you included the indexing feature (or made it obvious) ...has resulted in slower loads.i've noticed with the new core center that the fan speed will randomly rise (to an audible level) even when CnQ is keeping the cpu at 800mhz. The only way to slow the fan down again is to close core center and start it again. The settings I use haven't canged, the only cause could be the new core center software.
I haven't updated to the 1.4 bios but I'm about to do that so if things change i'll post back here. -
Report performance with Hierarchies
Hi
How to improve query performance with hierarchies. We have to do lot of navigation's in the query and the volume of data size very big.
Thanks
P GHI,
chk this:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1955ba90-0201-0010-d3aa-8b2a4ef6bbb2
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ce7fb368-0601-0010-64ba-fadc985a1f94
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4c0ab590-0201-0010-bd9a-8332d8b4f09c
Query Performance Is "Aggregates" the way out for me?
/people/vikash.agrawal/blog/2006/04/17/query-performance-150-is-aggregates-the-way-out-for-me
° the OLAP cache is architected to store query result sets and to give all users access to those result sets.
If a user executes a query, the result set for that querys request can be stored in the OLAP cache; if that same query (or a derivative) is then executed by another user, the subsequent query request can be filled by accessing the result set already stored in the OLAP cache.
In this way, a query request filled from the OLAP cache is significantly faster than queries that receive their result set from database access
° The indexes that are created in the fact table for each dimension allow you to easily find and select the data
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/1a6473e07211d2acb80000e829fbfe/content.htm
° when you load data into the InfoCube, each request has its own request ID, which is included in the fact table in the packet dimension.
This (besides giving the possibility to manage/delete single request) increases the volume of data, and reduces performance in reporting, as the system has to aggregate with the request ID every time you execute a query. Using compressing, you can eliminate these disadvantages, and bring data from different requests together into one single request (request ID 0).
This function is critical, as the compressed data can no longer be deleted from the InfoCube using its request IDs and, logically, you must be absolutely certain that the data loaded into the InfoCube is correct.
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ca/aa6437e7a4080ee10000009b38f842/content.htm
° by using partitioning you can split up the whole dataset for an InfoCube into several, smaller, physically independent and redundancy-free units. Thanks to this separation, performance is increased when reporting, or also when deleting data from the InfoCube.
see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/33/dc2038aa3bcd23e10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Hope it helps!
tHAK YOU,
dst -
Are there Issues with poor performance with Maverick OS,
Are there issues with slow and reduced performance with Mavericks OS
check this
http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/126081/10-9-2-slows-down-processes
or
this:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/25341556#25341556
I am doing a lot of analyses with 10.9.2 on a late 2013 MBP, and these analyses generally last hours or days. I observed that Maverick is slowing them down considerably for some reasons after few hours of computations, making it impossible for me to work with this computer... -
Performance with the new Mac Pros?
I sold my old Mac Pro (first generation) a few months ago in anticipation of the new line-up. In the meantime, I purchased a i7 iMac and 12GB of RAM. This machine is faster than my old Mac for most Aperture operations (except disk-intensive stuff that I only do occasionally).
I am ready to purchase a "real" Mac, but I'm hesitating because the improvements just don't seem that great. I have two questions:
1. Has anyone evaluated qualitative performance with the new ATI 5870 or 5770? Long ago, Aperture seemed pretty much GPU-constrained. I'm confused about whether that's the case anymore.
2. Has anyone evaluated any of the new Mac Pro chips for general day-to-day use? I'm interested in processing through my images as quickly as possible, so the actual latency to demosaic and render from the raw originals (Canon 1-series) is the most important metric. The second thing is having reasonable performance for multiple brushed-in effect bricks.
I'm mostly curious if anyone has any experience to point to whether it's worth it -- disregarding the other advantages like expandability and nicer (matte) displays.
Thanks.
BenThanks for writing. Please don't mind if I pick apart your statements.
"For an extra $200 the 5870 is a no brainer." I agree on a pure cost basis that it's not a hard decision. But I have a very quiet environment, and I understand this card can make a lot of noise. To pay money, end up with a louder machine, and on top of that realize no significant benefit would be a minor disaster.
So, the more interesting question is: has anyone actually used the 5870 and can compare it to previous cards? A 16-bit 60 megapixel image won't require even .5GB of VRAM if fully tiled into it, for example, so I have no ability, a priori, to prove to myself that it will matter. I guess I'm really hoping for real-world data. Perhaps you speak from this experience, Matthew? (I can't tell.)
Background work and exporting are helpful, but not as critical for my primary daily use. I know the CPU is also used for demosaicing or at least some subset of the render pipeline, because I have two computers that demonstrate vastly different render-from-raw response times with the same graphics card. Indeed, it is this lag that would be the most valuable of all for me to reduce. I want to be able to flip through a large shoot and see each image at 100% as instantaneously as possible. On my 2.8 i7 that process takes about 1 second on average (when Aperture doesn't get confused and mysteriously stop rendering 100% images).
Ben -
Performance with Boot Camp/Gaming?
Hi,
I just acquired a MBP/2GHz IntelCD/2GB RAM/100GB/Superdrive, with Applecare. Can anyone comment about the performance with
Boot Camp -- running Windows XP SP2, and what the gaming graphics are like?
Appreciate it, thanks...
J.
Powerbook G4 [15" Titanium - DVI] Mac OS X (10.4.8) 667MHz; 1GB RAM; 80GBWell, I didn't forget to mention what I did not know yet.... So that's not exactly correct..
As per Apple's support page, http://support.apple.com/specs/macbookpro/MacBook_Pro.html
My new computer does have 256MB of video memory... -
Performance with external display
Hello,
when I'm connecting my 19'' TFT to the MacBook the performance (with the same applications runnig) is realy bad. It tooks longer to switch between apps and if I don't use an app for some time, it can took up to 30 sec to "reactivate" the app.
Because the HD is working when I switch apps, it looks like the OS is swapping. My question: Would it help to upgrade the MacBook to 2GB ram? AFAIC the intel card uses shared memory.
Thanks for your help
Till
MacBook 1.83 GHz/1GB Mac OS X (10.4.8)How much RAM do you have? Remember that the MB does not have dedicated VRAM like some computers do and that it uses the system RAM to drive the graphics chipset.
I use my MB with the mini-DVI to DVI adapter to drive a 20" widescreen monitor without any of the problems that you describe, but I have 2GB of RAM. If you only have the stock 512MB of RAM, that may be part of what you are seeing. -
Performance with LinkedList in java
Hello All,
Please suggest me any solution to further improve the performance with List.
The problem description is as follows:
I have a huge number of objects, lets say 10,000 , and need to store the objects in such a collection so that if i want to store an object at some particular index i , I get the best performance.
I suppose as I need indexed based access, using List makes the best sense as Lists are ordered.
Using LinkedList over ArrayList gives the better performance in the aforementioned context.
Is there are way I can further improve the performance of LinkedList while solving this particular problem
OR
Is there any other index based collection using that i get better performance than LinkedList?
Thanks in advanceThe trouble with a LinkedList as implemented in the Java libraries is that if you want to insert at index 100, it has no option but to step through the first 100 links of the list to find the insert point. Likewise is you retrieve by index. The strength of the linked list approach is lost if you work by index and the List interface gives no other way to insert in the middle of the list. The natural interface for a linked list would include an extended Iterator with methods for insert and replace. Of course LinkedLists are fine when you insert first or last.
My guess would be that if your habitual insertion point was half way or more through the list then ArrayList would serve you better especially if you leave ample room for growth. Moving array elements up is probably not much more expensive, per element, than walking the linked list. Maybe 150% or thereabouts.
Much depends on how you retrieve, and how volatile the list is. Certainly if you are a read-mostly situation and cannot use an iterator then a LinkedList won't suit. -
Performance with dates in the where clause
Performance with dates in the where clause
CREATE TABLE TEST_DATA
FNUMBER NUMBER,
FSTRING VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
FDATE DATE
create index t_indx on test_data(fdata);
query 1: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
query 2: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
query 3: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_date('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
My questions:
1) Why isn't the index t_indx used in Execution plan 1?
2) From the execution plan, I see that query 2 & 3 is better than query 1. I do not see any difference between execution plan 2 & 3. Which one is better?
3) I read somewhere - "Always check the Access Predicates and Filter Predicates of Explain Plan carefully to determine which columns are contributing to a Range Scan and which columns are merely filtering the returned rows. Be sceptical if the same clause is shown in both."
Is that true for Execution plan 2 & 3?
3) Could some one explain what the filter & access predicate mean here?
Thanks in advance.
Execution Plan 1:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1486387033
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 517 (20)| 00:00:07 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_DATA | 341 | 3069 | 517 (20)| 00:00:07 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TRUNC(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("FDATE"))=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!))
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
4 recursive calls
0 db block gets
1610 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
Execution Plan 2:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1687886199
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| T_INDX | 283 | 2547 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)<=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)+.9999884259259259259259
259259259259259259)
3 - access("FDATE">=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!) AND
"FDATE"<=TRUNC(SYSDATE@!)+.999988425925925925925925925925925925925
9)
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
7 recursive calls
0 db block gets
76 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows
Execution Plan 3:
SQL> select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_dat
e('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
COUNT(*)
283
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1687886199
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 9 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 9 | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN| T_INDX | 283 | 2547 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter(TO_DATE('21-APR-10','dd-MON-yy')<=TO_DATE('21-APR-10
23:59:59','DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss'))
3 - access("FDATE">=TO_DATE('21-APR-10','dd-MON-yy') AND
"FDATE"<=TO_DATE('21-APR-10 23:59:59','DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss'))
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
Statistics
7 recursive calls
0 db block gets
76 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
412 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
380 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processedHi,
user10541890 wrote:
Performance with dates in the where clause
CREATE TABLE TEST_DATA
FNUMBER NUMBER,
FSTRING VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
FDATE DATE
create index t_indx on test_data(fdata);Did you mean fdat<b>e</b> (ending in e)?
Be careful; post the code you're actually running.
query 1: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where trunc(fdate) = trunc(sysdate);
query 2: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between trunc(sysdate) and trunc(SYSDATE) + .99999;
query 3: select count(*) from TEST_DATA where fdate between to_date('21-APR-10', 'dd-MON-yy') and to_date('21-APR-10 23:59:59', 'DD-MON-YY hh24:mi:ss');
My questions:
1) Why isn't the index t_indx used in Execution plan 1?To use an index, the indexed column must stand alone as one of the operands. If you had a function-based index on TRUNC (fdate), then it might be used in Query 1, because the left operand of = is TRUNC (fdate).
2) From the execution plan, I see that query 2 & 3 is better than query 1. I do not see any difference between execution plan 2 & 3. Which one is better?That depends on what you mean by "better".
If "better" means faster, you've already shown that one is about as good as the other.
Queries 2 and 3 are doing different things. Assuming the table stays the same, Query 2 may give different results every day, but the results of Query 3 will never change.
For clarity, I prefer:
WHERE fdate >= TRUNC (SYSDATE)
AND fdate < TRUNC (SYSDATE) + 1(or replace SYSDATE with a TO_DATE expression, depending on the requirements).
3) I read somewhere - "Always check the Access Predicates and Filter Predicates of Explain Plan carefully to determine which columns are contributing to a Range Scan and which columns are merely filtering the returned rows. Be sceptical if the same clause is shown in both."
Is that true for Execution plan 2 & 3?
3) Could some one explain what the filter & access predicate mean here?Sorry, I can't. -
When i downloaded FCPX i was told I really didn't need to partition my hard drive. But my performance with fcpx is terrible from rendering constantly to waiting for a minute after you click for it to do it. I turn off the rendring, I transcoded the media to pro res went to file and hit transcode. but still i mean it crashes, buggy, suggy and it takes hours to do anything. I have my media on a external drive but i did screw up and put some media on internal drive. iMac OSX 10.7.2 3.06 GHZ Core 2 Duo. EX HD LaCie on a 800 firewire.
Partitioning the internal drive is - imho! - completely useless for UNIX-systems such as MacOS, due to excessive usage of (hidden!) temp-files.
And, especially a too small int. HDD partition for the system will brake any app 'til a full halt.
plus, 10.7. has some issues with managing Timemachine backups when it comes to large files as video - again, if the intHDD/OS drive is too small, it gets iffy.
at last >30GBs free, only codecs and material as intended by Cupertino = no probs here (on a much smaller/older set-up). -
Slow Performance with Business Rules
Hello,
Has anyone ever had slow performance with business rules? For example, I attached a calc script to a form and it ran for 20 seconds. I made an exact replica of the calc script in a business rules and it took 30 seconds to run. Also, when creating / modifying business rules in EAS it takes a long time to open or save or attach security - any ideas on things to improve this performance?
Thanks!If you are having issues with performance of assigning access then I am sure there was patch available, it was either a HSS patch or planning patch.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
Very Slow SMB Performance with DroboShare
Hi there,
We have a big issue with a DroboShare NAS device connected to a Drobo Drive (FAT32):
If we connect to our DroboShare NAS directly via LAN, the performance with SMB is terrible. Browsing folders takes minutes until the contents (15 items) are shown, opening and saving files takes minutes.
If we connect the Drobo via USB to one of our Macs and then share it via SMB, it is fast as ****.
Problem is that we cannot leave it this way, as we only have portable macs, so if they are removed, nobody can access the Drobo.
The problem nevertheless seems to be restricted to Macs: If we connect to the DroboShare with Linux or Windows Boxes, everything is as fast as expected.
Does anyone has similar issues with weak performance and/or knows how this can improved?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
SimonI just ported netatalk (AFP) over to the DroboShare.
http://code.google.com/p/drobocapsule/ -
Extremely slow performance with Radeon HD 7870
Hi,
I am using a number of Adobe programs on my new Windows 8 64 bit system, with 16 gigs of ram, an Intel Core i5 2.67ghz, and AMD Radeon HD 7870 2 gig. All the programs (including After Effects and Illustrator) work very well with the exception of Photoshop CS6 64 bit, which has extremely slow performance with Use Graphics Processor enabled in my preferences (which Photoshop selects by default). If I turn off Use Graphics Processor, the slow performance vanishes. If I change Drawing Mode to Basic, there might be a slightly detectable improvement over Normal and Advanced, but it's still horribly slow. The refresh rate seems to be just a few frames per second. Everything is slow: brushes, zooming, panning, everything.
I've tried changing the settings I've seen suggested elsewhere: I switched Cache levels to 2, history states to 10, and tile size to 128k. No effect. Photoshop is currently at the default of using 60% of available ram. Efficiency has remained at 100% throughout all my tests. Also, this slow performance has affected me from the moment I installed Photoshop; it didn't crop up after previous good performance. The problem exists regardless of the size or number of documents I have open. Performance is still terrible even when I create a 500 x 500 pixel blank new canvas and try a simple task like drawing with the brush.
Photoshop is fully up to date, and so are my graphics drivers (Catalyst version 13.1). Any help would be greatly appreciated; at the moment performance is so bad in Photoshop that it's unusable with graphics acceleration enabled. Thanks in advance for replying.
Photoshop System Info:
Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00) x64
Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit
Version: 6.2
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Physical processor count: 4
Processor speed: 2665 MHz
Built-in memory: 16379 MB
Free memory: 13443 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 14697 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
Image tile size: 128K
Image cache levels: 2
OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
OpenGL Drawing Mode: Advanced
OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
OpenCL Version: 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4)
OpenGL Version: 3.0
Video Rect Texture Size: 16384
OpenGL Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
Video Card Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Display: 1
Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920
Video Card Number: 2
Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Driver Version:
Driver Date:
Video Card Driver: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.d ll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,atidxx32,atiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 4294967296 colors
Video Card Caption: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Video Card Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Number: 1
Video Card: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Driver Version: 9.12.0.0
Driver Date: 20121219000000.000000-000
Video Card Driver:
Video Mode:
Video Card Caption: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Video Card Memory: 0 MB
Serial number: 90970078453021833509
Application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\
Temporary file path: C:\Users\RAFFAE~1\AppData\Local\Temp\
Photoshop scratch has async I/O enabled
Scratch volume(s):
C:\, 931.5G, 534.8G free
Required Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Required\
Primary Plug-ins folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)\Plug-ins\
Additional Plug-ins folder: not set
Installed components:
ACE.dll ACE 2012/06/05-15:16:32 66.507768 66.507768
adbeape.dll Adobe APE 2012/01/25-10:04:55 66.1025012 66.1025012
AdobeLinguistic.dll Adobe Linguisitc Library 6.0.0
AdobeOwl.dll Adobe Owl 2012/09/10-12:31:21 5.0.4 79.517869
AdobePDFL.dll PDFL 2011/12/12-16:12:37 66.419471 66.419471
AdobePIP.dll Adobe Product Improvement Program 7.0.0.1686
AdobeXMP.dll Adobe XMP Core 2012/02/06-14:56:27 66.145661 66.145661
AdobeXMPFiles.dll Adobe XMP Files 2012/02/06-14:56:27 66.145661 66.145661
AdobeXMPScript.dll Adobe XMP Script 2012/02/06-14:56:27 66.145661 66.145661
adobe_caps.dll Adobe CAPS 6,0,29,0
AGM.dll AGM 2012/06/05-15:16:32 66.507768 66.507768
ahclient.dll AdobeHelp Dynamic Link Library 1,7,0,56
aif_core.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
aif_ocl.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
aif_ogl.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
amtlib.dll AMTLib (64 Bit) 6.0.0.75 (BuildVersion: 6.0; BuildDate: Mon Jan 16 2012 18:00:00) 1.000000
ARE.dll ARE 2012/06/05-15:16:32 66.507768 66.507768
AXE8SharedExpat.dll AXE8SharedExpat 2011/12/16-15:10:49 66.26830 66.26830
AXEDOMCore.dll AXEDOMCore 2011/12/16-15:10:49 66.26830 66.26830
Bib.dll BIB 2012/06/05-15:16:32 66.507768 66.507768
BIBUtils.dll BIBUtils 2012/06/05-15:16:32 66.507768 66.507768
boost_date_time.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
boost_signals.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
boost_system.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
boost_threads.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
cg.dll NVIDIA Cg Runtime 3.0.00007
cgGL.dll NVIDIA Cg Runtime 3.0.00007
CIT.dll Adobe CIT 2.1.0.20577 2.1.0.20577
CoolType.dll CoolType 2012/06/05-15:16:32 66.507768 66.507768
data_flow.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
dvaaudiodevice.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
dvacore.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
dvamarshal.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
dvamediatypes.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
dvaplayer.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
dvatransport.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
dvaunittesting.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
dynamiclink.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
ExtendScript.dll ExtendScript 2011/12/14-15:08:46 66.490082 66.490082
FileInfo.dll Adobe XMP FileInfo 2012/01/17-15:11:19 66.145433 66.145433
filter_graph.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
hydra_filters.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
icucnv40.dll International Components for Unicode 2011/11/15-16:30:22 Build gtlib_3.0.16615
icudt40.dll International Components for Unicode 2011/11/15-16:30:22 Build gtlib_3.0.16615
image_compiler.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
image_flow.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
image_runtime.dll AIF 3.0 62.490293
JP2KLib.dll JP2KLib 2011/12/12-16:12:37 66.236923 66.236923
libifcoremd.dll Intel(r) Visual Fortran Compiler 10.0 (Update A)
libmmd.dll Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler 12.0
LogSession.dll LogSession 2.1.2.1681
mediacoreif.dll DVA Product 6.0.0
MPS.dll MPS 2012/02/03-10:33:13 66.495174 66.495174
msvcm80.dll Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005 8.00.50727.6910
msvcm90.dll Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008 9.00.30729.1
msvcp100.dll Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2010 10.00.40219.1
msvcp80.dll Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005 8.00.50727.6910
msvcp90.dll Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008 9.00.30729.1
msvcr100.dll Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2010 10.00.40219.1
msvcr80.dll Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2005 8.00.50727.6910
msvcr90.dll Microsoft® Visual Studio® 2008 9.00.30729.1
pdfsettings.dll Adobe PDFSettings 1.04
Photoshop.dll Adobe Photoshop CS6 CS6
Plugin.dll Adobe Photoshop CS6 CS6
PlugPlug.dll Adobe(R) CSXS PlugPlug Standard Dll (64 bit) 3.0.0.383
PSArt.dll Adobe Photoshop CS6 CS6
PSViews.dll Adobe Photoshop CS6 CS6
SCCore.dll ScCore 2011/12/14-15:08:46 66.490082 66.490082
ScriptUIFlex.dll ScriptUIFlex 2011/12/14-15:08:46 66.490082 66.490082
svml_dispmd.dll Intel(r) C Compiler, Intel(r) C++ Compiler, Intel(r) Fortran Compiler 12.0
tbb.dll Intel(R) Threading Building Blocks for Windows 3, 0, 2010, 0406
tbbmalloc.dll Intel(R) Threading Building Blocks for Windows 3, 0, 2010, 0406
updaternotifications.dll Adobe Updater Notifications Library 6.0.0.24 (BuildVersion: 1.0; BuildDate: BUILDDATETIME) 6.0.0.24
WRServices.dll WRServices Friday January 27 2012 13:22:12 Build 0.17112 0.17112
Required plug-ins:
3D Studio 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Accented Edges 13.0
Adaptive Wide Angle 13.0
Angled Strokes 13.0
Average 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Bas Relief 13.0
BMP 13.0
Camera Raw 7.3
Chalk & Charcoal 13.0
Charcoal 13.0
Chrome 13.0
Cineon 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Clouds 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Collada 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Color Halftone 13.0
Colored Pencil 13.0
CompuServe GIF 13.0
Conté Crayon 13.0
Craquelure 13.0
Crop and Straighten Photos 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Crop and Straighten Photos Filter 13.0
Crosshatch 13.0
Crystallize 13.0
Cutout 13.0
Dark Strokes 13.0
De-Interlace 13.0
Dicom 13.0
Difference Clouds 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Diffuse Glow 13.0
Displace 13.0
Dry Brush 13.0
Eazel Acquire 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Embed Watermark 4.0
Entropy 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Extrude 13.0
FastCore Routines 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Fibers 13.0
Film Grain 13.0
Filter Gallery 13.0
Flash 3D 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Fresco 13.0
Glass 13.0
Glowing Edges 13.0
Google Earth 4 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Grain 13.0
Graphic Pen 13.0
Halftone Pattern 13.0
HDRMergeUI 13.0
IFF Format 13.0
Ink Outlines 13.0
JPEG 2000 13.0
Kurtosis 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Lens Blur 13.0
Lens Correction 13.0
Lens Flare 13.0
Liquify 13.0
Matlab Operation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Maximum 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Mean 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Measurement Core 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Median 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Mezzotint 13.0
Minimum 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
MMXCore Routines 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Mosaic Tiles 13.0
Multiprocessor Support 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Neon Glow 13.0
Note Paper 13.0
NTSC Colors 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Ocean Ripple 13.0
Oil Paint 13.0
OpenEXR 13.0
Paint Daubs 13.0
Palette Knife 13.0
Patchwork 13.0
Paths to Illustrator 13.0
PCX 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Photocopy 13.0
Photoshop 3D Engine 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Picture Package Filter 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Pinch 13.0
Pixar 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Plaster 13.0
Plastic Wrap 13.0
PNG 13.0
Pointillize 13.0
Polar Coordinates 13.0
Portable Bit Map 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Poster Edges 13.0
Radial Blur 13.0
Radiance 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Range 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Read Watermark 4.0
Reticulation 13.0
Ripple 13.0
Rough Pastels 13.0
Save for Web 13.0
ScriptingSupport 13.1.2
Shear 13.0
Skewness 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Smart Blur 13.0
Smudge Stick 13.0
Solarize 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Spatter 13.0
Spherize 13.0
Sponge 13.0
Sprayed Strokes 13.0
Stained Glass 13.0
Stamp 13.0
Standard Deviation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
STL 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Sumi-e 13.0
Summation 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Targa 13.0
Texturizer 13.0
Tiles 13.0
Torn Edges 13.0
Twirl 13.0
Underpainting 13.0
Vanishing Point 13.0
Variance 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Variations 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Water Paper 13.0
Watercolor 13.0
Wave 13.0
Wavefront|OBJ 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
WIA Support 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
Wind 13.0
Wireless Bitmap 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00)
ZigZag 13.0
Optional and third party plug-ins:
DAZ Studio 3D Bridge 12.0
DazUpdateScene 12.0
Plug-ins that failed to load: NONE
Flash:
Mini Bridge
Kuler
Installed TWAIN devices: NONEGreat news!
I followed your suggestion, Noel, and uninstalled my drivers with the Catalyst Uninstall Utility (which I hadn't used before), rebooted, reinstalled Catalyst 13.2 Beta 7, rebooted, deleted the PS Prefs, started PS, and now the performance is radically improved!
It baffles me why I would need to do a clean driver uninstall in a new system environment that has only ever had this video card, and is only a few months old, but that action seems to be what's improved the situation. Note that because I deleted the PS preferences, the good performance now occurs with the default Use Graphics Processor enabled, and Drawing Mode set to Advanced (with every feature in the Advanced dialog checked except 30bit display).
Having no reference point, I can't tell for sure if performance is as good as it theoretically ought to be for my system specs, but using the standard 13px brush is only slightly laggy behind the cursor, even if I become reckless and squiggle on the canvas violently. It wasn't just sluggish response before: Photoshop seemed to be in pain trying to draw the line segments as it laboured to catch up to the cursor. That is pretty much gone now.
Much more tellingly, zooming and panning the canvas is like it ought to be, responsive and clean, more or less like it was for me in CS4 with my old Nvidia 9600GT. The poor performance with zooming and panning was the most worrying aspect of the issue. It's a great relief to see these working more properly now.
I have to confess I'm a little embarrassed to have drug you through all this hassle only to discover that something as rudimentary as properly cleaning out the drivers would be the apparent solution. I never would have imagined that doing that, with such a new and stable system, would make any difference, since I don't have a legacy of older drivers dotting my hard drive. In any event, I'm really grateful that you guys took the time to try to help me.
In the interest of completeness, here's the relevant portion of my system info after doing the reinstall steps I mentioned above:
Adobe Photoshop Version: 13.1.2 (13.1.2 20130105.r.224 2013/01/05:23:00:00) x64
Operating System: Windows 8 64-bit
Version: 6.2
System architecture: Intel CPU Family:6, Model:14, Stepping:5 with MMX, SSE Integer, SSE FP, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Physical processor count: 4
Processor speed: 2665 MHz
Built-in memory: 16379 MB
Free memory: 13680 MB
Memory available to Photoshop: 14695 MB
Memory used by Photoshop: 60 %
Image tile size: 1024K
Image cache levels: 4
OpenGL Drawing: Enabled.
OpenGL Drawing Mode: Advanced
OpenGL Allow Normal Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Advanced Mode: True.
OpenGL Allow Old GPUs: Not Detected.
OpenCL Version: 3.0
OpenGL Version: 3.0
Video Rect Texture Size: 16384
OpenGL Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Vendor: ATI Technologies Inc.
Video Card Renderer: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Display: 1
Display Bounds: top=0, left=0, bottom=1080, right=1920
Video Card Number: 2
Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Driver Version:
Driver Date:
Video Card Driver: aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx64.dll,aticfx32,aticfx32,aticfx32,atiumd64.dll,atidxx64.d ll,atidxx64.dll,atiumdag,atidxx32,atidxx32,atiumdva,atiumd6a.cap,atitmm64.dll
Video Mode: 1920 x 1080 x 4294967296 colors
Video Card Caption: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Video Card Memory: 2048 MB
Video Card Number: 1
Video Card: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Driver Version: 12.100.17.0
Driver Date: 20130226000000.000000-000
Video Card Driver:
Video Mode:
Video Card Caption: Microsoft Basic Render Driver
Video Card Memory: 0 MB
As you can see, the Microsoft Basic Render Driver still appears as a Video Card in the list. This presumably has something to do with Windows 8, and I really don't know if its presence here is still a sign that my card is not being used to its optimal capability. I have a hunch that the slight lag that I am still experiencing with the brush when Use Graphics Processor is on -- totally absent with the acceleration turned off -- implies that Photoshop is still unable to take maximum advantage of my card. I would assume that the brush tool should be more responsive with acceleration on than off, in a rig without any issues, but that's just assumption on my part. If you turn off Use Graphics Processor on your systems, is the brush tool more or less responsive?
But again, panning the canvas with the hand tool is now extremely responsive, without any screen tearing or visible lag, and that's a massive improvement over the total meltdown of performance I was suffering from before.
Thanks again very much for your help. I'm grateful to all of you who took the time to chime in. -
Bad performance with brandnew system
hello,
i set up a completely new win7-64bit based on a fresh osx (snow-leopard update) on a fresh harddisk....and i have very bad 3d performance with only 3 (!!) programs installed. i am working with autodesk 3ds max and autocad and both run very slow. my last system was win7-64bit, too, but running MUCH faster.
it must be a driver problem, but i dont know how to change the nvidia driver.
edit:
after having changed driver from directx 9 to open-gl performance is very fast.
please help.
alex
Message was edited by: mbp_3dHi Bruno
In the following Re: Generic Sync: Object can not be deserilized / Multiple synchronization call you had mentioned that you are using MI 2.5 SP16 Client. For your information MI doesnt support Windows Mobile 5 OS on SP16 but only from SP18 does it support this OS. Have you tried upgrading the client to any of the SPs i had mentioned in the above thread and then checked the performance?
Best Regards
Sivakumar -
Best performance with forms 4.5 than 6i ?!!!
Hi,
Since i'd upgrade my app with forms 6i, i find that when i make a query, this is more slow with 6i than 4.5, with the same db(8i).
Does anyone else had the same problem?
What could i do to resolve the problem?
Thanks.
nullSee my earlier posting 'Speeding load time of WEB Forms50'. I
have had no takers yet on a solution to this. There may be some
hints for you there.
Good luck on this one - Forms over the WEB seems to be very
processor and memory hungry. We would like to support about 200
users on a VERY simple search screen, but we need about 2Gbyte
of physical memory on the server to get any amount of useful
speed out of it. Each Forms session takes up about 10Mbyte on
the server - as soon as this starts swapping out to disk then
your run-time performance goes right downhill. The earlier-
mentioned posting gives some hints on speeding up the startup
time, and it does work.
Regards,
Jason Judge
Natasha Murillo (guest) wrote:
: How I can Get better performance with Forms 4.5 and 6.0 on the
: WEB???
: It is very slow and my customers are not very happy with
that...
: Please help me...
null
Maybe you are looking for
-
Where is the download link for cs5.1 for mac?
I bought Photoshop CS5.1 for my iMac. I now need it on my Macbook too as I am traveling for work. I'm pretty sure I can use my existing licence on 2 devices, seeing as I will only use one at a time. My serial key is for cs5.1 but the only Photoshop d
-
When I installed Firefox I inadvertently responded "yes" when asked if I wanted to "pin" my home page to the browser. l also designated that page (my Juno page) as my home page. So now whenever I open Firefox, two tabs appear with my identical home p
-
Adobe Flash Builder 4.6 Installation Fails
Hi, I made a package with AAME adobe tool of Adobe Flash Builder. I obtain a nice .msi. I am in company deployment. My silent command line is : "msiexec / i" / / FlashBuilder.msi "/ q. But the install rollback, i don't know why. I do not have older
-
Can you please provide the solution for creating process chain..
Hi Experts, i need to work on this process chain PC_UN_HR_SAP_PM_TD01, i need to add one more step before DSO load that means delete existing data from DSO please let u know as soon as possible.
-
My Road Warrior Mac Book has finally taken too much kid handling. Pressing the power button, the hard drive stars clicking. By the sound, it makes several searches. BuzzBuzz,,,, Buzzbuzz Then the light goes on at he monitor screen, and then it blinks