Decrete job receipts not cosidered in planned order

recently found couple of items having MPS/MPP planning method having descrete job receipts but when MRP shows planned orders it does not consider descrete job receipts. If i change planning method to MRP/MPP it does consider those descrete job receips. I would want it to consider descrere job receipts with MPS/MPP planning as well like its doing for MRP/MPP...any hints what setup is missing?
Thanks in advance.

the MRP run does not convert planned order to requisitions.
the MRP run either creates planned orders OR requisitions.
this is based on the setting made at MRP run selection screen, and the procurement indicator in the material master.
Assume you have made the setting "always create requisitions" for the MRP run, then SAP still checks the material master procurement indicator.
if it is a F for external procurement, then it will create requisition, it is a E for internal procurement, then it will create planned orders. if it is an X for both procurements possible, then it will create as well planned orders, so that the planner can finaly make the decision from where it will be procured.

Similar Messages

  • Why the basic finish date is not adjusted in planned orders

    Hi, all.
    Can anybody help me to understand:
    "Why the basic finish date is not adjusted in planned orders during
    forward scheduling, but in production order basic finish date is adjusted?
    It is look like non-coordination between groups of developers.
    And lead to situation, when planner don't see in MD04 when he can really wait material receipt. He must go to planed order and check production data there, it's unusable."
    Am I right, or SAP have it's own logic.

    Hi,
    Production orders are different story. Since production order is a constant element, they are not created in the course of MRP, basic dates can be adjusted. In production order basic finish date is adjusted, but you won't see for the upper level materials', basic dates of the planned orders adjusted according to the prodcution order you create. Production order is consistent within itself in terms of date and is not dependent to other elements of MRP, but planned orders are not like that.
    MRP creates planned orders whose basic finish dates are calculated by subtracting goods receipt time from production start date of the source of requirement. MRP works backwards without changing directions. Meanwhile if any production finish date is calculated different than the basic finish date due to forward scheduling, in order not to violate the alignment between the basic finish date and source of requirement's start date, basic finish date is not adjusted. If it was, dates of all the planned orders calculated so far at the upper levels of the BOMs had to be recalculated, otherwise all the consistency of all the dates is violated. This cannot be done because changes in any level affects all lower levels.

  • Deployment - setting for system not to create planned orders.

    hi
    I am executing deployment at the plant level.
    i have req. of 8000 on 26th and 9000 on 27th.
    i created a stock of 3000 on 25th.
    i am executing push deployment and maintained setting accordingly.
    After completion of deployment, system deploys the stock ie 3000 and creates Planned order for the remaining 5000 to meet the demand of 8000.
    What setting has to be maintained such that system only deploys 3000 or the stock only and does not create a planned order for the unful filled demand. ???
    in onther words system should deploy the stock and should not do anything more than that.
    Thanks.

    Hi Aswath,
    Can you answer these few questions for me? I will be able to answer your more appropriately.
    What is the order of planning runs in your system?
    1. DPR for demand at DC that creates distribution demand at the plant
    2. Deployment of the current stock at the plant
    3. Planning run at the plant to create planned order for any demand left out
    Is that the order? This does not make good sense for me but I don't know your scenario.
    What kind of deployment run are you suing? deployment heuristics or optimizer?
    In both the cases, you have "delete" and "reduce" option.
    The system deploys the stock at the DC based on the distribution demand ( coming from DC to Plant).
    If you use delete option, the system deploys for the amount of stock it has and deletes the remaining distribution demand.
    So, if you got distribution demand of 100 PCs, there is only 50 PCs stock at plant, the plant deploys 50 and deletes the other 50 PCs distribution demand at the plant. You need to rerun DRP at DC if you want to get back this demand.
    If you use reduce option, the system deploys for the amount of stock it has and reduces the remaining distribution demand.
    So, if you got distribution demand of 100 PCs, there is only 50 PCs stock at plant, the plant deploys 50 and reduces the distribution demand at the plant to 50 PCs.
    I think you have the second case and you are running planning run at the plant and it's creating orders. If you don't want the system to create them, use the "delete" option in deployment run.
    Please let me know if I am getting your point right.

  • Goods receipt not ticked in production order converted from sales order req

    Hi all,
    In MTO scenario, where requirement trigger from Inquiry -> Quotatation -> Sales Order -> Plan Order -> Production Order, goods receipt indicator in production order was not checked if requirement is triggering from sales order, however it is ticked if requirement trigger from inquiry, therefore we are not able to do confirmation. Appreciate if anyone able to assist us as soon as possible.
    Thanks in advanced.

    Hi,
    I understood that---
    If u r creating Sales order directly without Quotation u r  not able to do the GR.
    If u create from Quotation, u r able to do GR. right?
    I think, Problem with Settlement. Please Look into that.
    Kiran.

  • Goods receipt not marked for production order trigger from sales order

    Hi all,
    In MTO scenario, where requirement trigger from Inquiry -> Quotatation -> Sales Order -> Plan Order -> Production Order, goods receipt indicator in production order was not checked if requirement is triggering from sales order, however it is ticked if requirement trigger from inquiry, therefore we are not able to do confirmation. Appreciate if anyone able to assist us as soon as possible.
    Thanks in advanced.

    Hi,
    I understood that---
    If u r creating Sales order directly without Quotation u r  not able to do the GR.
    If u create from Quotation, u r able to do GR. right?
    I think, Problem with Settlement. Please Look into that.
    Kiran.

  • Not to convert planned  orders  into  production  orders.

    I donot  want  to  convert all the  planned  orders in a plant  into  production  orders on a specific date  only ( SAY on 5th Oct -2007 planned  orders  should  not  be  converted  to  production  orders in a  particular  plant).pl tell me  what  customisation is  required  to be  changed or  else  what is  the  solution.
                                                                             jpb

    Hi,
    Planned order is just a system proposed order its upto the user if they want to use all or part of it, for this they have to convert them.. If you dont want to convert them you can delete them as else the SNP will keep considering it as a valid supply.
    If the planned orders are not required on some particular dates on a permanent basis then you need to modify the Factory calender accordingly, so that the system will consider as if the resources are not available on thoese dates.
    Reward point plz...
    Regards,
    manjit.

  • MRP not rescheduling the planned order by itself

    Hi,
    After MRP i could see that the planned order is not present as per the date of the requriement whereas the planned order at a future date is given a Exception message 30 : Plan accordingly to schedule and proposed the date of the requirement. The requirement is beyound the replenishement lead time and hence MRP should reschedule by itself the planned order as per the date of the requirement rather than giving a exception message as above for a future dated planned order.
    I am not sure what is it i am missing. Could you explain.
    Thank you

    Dear ,
    MRP will re schedule the planned order based couple of inputs and checks during MRP run .Basically , it depends on following
    In MRP exectuion you should  keep : Procesisng Indicator : NETPL: The system only plans materials that have undergone a change that is relevant to the planning run within the period which you defined as the planning horizon. The system sets the net change planning horizon indicator automatically for these materials 
    Planning Mode : 3-Delete and Re-create Planning
    It also depend on following set up  and you need to analysie that :
    1.Planning Time Fence : based on the PTF , there will not be any automatic changes relevent for MRP
    2.MRP Type : PD , it will adoped normal planning and it will not re-schedule order proposal automatically  .In you case  can use P1-Automatic Firming and Re-schedule Out Of Order Proposal based planning time Fence
    3.Keep your Planning Horzon more than the Highest Material Lead Time in Material Master MRP2 View
    Please check and revert
    Regards
    JH

  • PP - Phantom Assembly Alt Item in BOM not loaded in Planned Order

    Hi all,
    I have a scenario where in my finished product, I have several components organized in Alternate Group, and for each group, I define a component as Prime (100% usage) and others as Alternate (0% utilization). Among these there are some components that are configured as Phantom (Special Procurement 50), and these Phantom items, when they are Alternate in the BOM, ie, 0% Probability of Use in Alternate Item Group, it is not loaded in the list of components in Planned Order. Only the Phantom that is as Prime in BOM is showed in the Planned Order, together with their subcomponents.
    The other components that are not phantom, usually appear within the Planned Order, those that have 100% utilization, and those who have 0% utilization set in the BOM. Obviously, all requirement is pointed in the Prime Item, but I can change according to availability of material in MDVP or manually in CO02.
    When the Production Order is created directly by CO01, without conversion of planned order, the list of components typically brings all the Phantoms, independently of the Probability Use %.
    Someone tell me if there is some kind of configuration to allow the Phantoms Optional also be uploaded to the component list of planned orders without having to change the percentage of use in BOM.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello MCantos,
    When you have maintained the usage probability as 0% for a alternative component, that means you do not want that partular material to be planned further. In short this is just an Engineering Relevant Material (is not required in Production activity).
    When this alternate material with usage probability 0% is phantom material, you want its components to be proposed. But you yourself have answered that this phantom material has usage probability 0% and this means it is not required in Production and thus its components as well are not required. Thus system is not exploding the BOM and proposing the material at the time of Production activity.
    Hope I answered your query. Please check your usage probability for phantom assembly part and if required correct the same so that you can achive what you want.
    Thanks,
    Rahul.

  • Modifying Sales order in ECC does not modify the planned order in APO?

    Hello,
    I have the next situation, a MTO scenario, LPP material,:
    - users create a sales order, quantity 2000M, 2 individual lenghts by 1000M. In automatically, being a MTO scenario, APO generates a planned order to fulfill the requirement with 2000 M qty, individual lenght 1000.
    - users modify the sales order, the quantity 2000 M remains, but will change it in 1 individual lenght by 2000M. APO cancels the precendently created planned order and generates another one, with individual lenght 2000.This is OK.
    -users modify the sales order, the quantity remains 2000 M, but again 2 individual lenghts by 1000 M. In this case, the planned order is not cancelled, as expected, but remains with individual lenght 2000, which is not ok.
    Any idea how to fix this?
    Regards,
    Alex

    Hello again,
    while creating/changing sales order in crm,
    the user exit mv45 is called in R3.
    Problem solved.
    Thanks
    Gerd

  • Setup time not seen for Planned Orders/ Man Orders in GPB

    Hi all,
    I'm facing an issue where I'm unable to see the Setup activity(green bar) in the Graphical Planning Board for Planned Orders and Manufacturing Orders.
    At first I thought this was only happening for Planned Orders in Released status. However this behavior seems to be erratic with some orders on the same Product showing Setup whereas others are not.
    Any ideas?
    ~Rishi

    Hi,
    I am assuming you are using setup matrix .
    In case of setup matrix system will take setup time from setup matrix.
    If two planned order are created for the same product, system will consider the setup time for the first. For the second it will not show setup time (becasue most probably you have maintained product x to product x - o times).
    Regards
    Amlan

  • PMEVC calculations are not shown in planned order

    Dear Experts ;
    I have a strange issue that I need help with please the multilevel characteristic values dependency
    first I created Material Z Semi-finished with classification view which has 2 characteristics as shown below
    then I created Material M KMAT with only one characteristic as shown
    then I created the BOM for material M as shown
    now I tested the variant with the dependency through PMEVC as following
    check result
    Now lets check the Planned Order
    NOW IT GIVES A WRONG RESULT
    CAN ANYBODY HELP ?????

    any help ??
    Samier Danish Rachel Tang Mohamed Abd elrazek Mohamed PRASOON AK Rob Burbank LAXMIKANTH Patnaik Anders Jensen
    Thanks

  • Goods receipt not possible against internal order

    Hi Experts
    Internal order  error, PO has been raised against this internal order  when a good receipt was attempted to be posted it was blocked saying the Internal  code was not recognised.Please give your valuable suggestions
    Regards
    Ayub

    Hi Dear,
                In your case please check the following points:
    1. Check if the Internal Order is released.
    2. Check if the PO created is in refrence with the PR(Generated Automatically Via Internal Order).
    3. Check back if the Internal Order is not Technically Completed, If TECO done then Please remove the TECO.
    Hope it will help you.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

  • SNP planned order deleted in APO, but not in R/3.

    OK Guru's,
    We have a situation where during the weekend SNP planning runs, SNP Planned orders are deleted in APO, but the order is never deleted in R/3.  The change pointer is not in CPP and there are no failed queues.  Also, when you run CCR on planned orders, we will get an error on some orders saying "Not in APO" and the only option to reconcile that order is to "Send to APO".  The option that should exist is "delete in R/3" becuase the deletion never occured in R/3.
    If you send the order back to APO, the order will show in the "Production Confirmed" line of the Planning Book.  This is because APO is thinking that this order is an order that was created in R/3 when in fact is it really is a SNP planned order.
    Any clues to why this would happen?
    thanks,
    Brian

    How are you getting the SNP Planned Orders to R/3 in the first place.
    If you are transferring them using /SAPAPO/RRP7 then I guesss its a manual transfer and system does not consider SNP Planned Order deletion flag relevant for transfer to R/3.
    You will need to look into CIF enhancement to send the deletions to R/3.
    Normally SNP Planned Orders are not relevant for transfer to R/3 unless its replaced or converted to a PPDS planned order.
    Somnath

  • SNP Planned order not following resource bucket capacity/factory calendar

    Hi gurus,
    SCM 5.0
    I am running SNP heuristics for a product and expecting planned orders for it.  It has corresponding production data structure and multimixed resource.  The resource has an assignd factory calendar and SNP bucket capacity.  The bucket capactiy availablity dates of the resouce is consistent with the factory calendar workdays/holidays.  Using simple lot for lot strategy, I am expecting heuristics to schedule the planned orders on the dates of the demand in compliance with teh SNP bucket capacity availability of the resource.  APO does not schedule on holidays consistent with bucket capactiy.  This is true until...
    We have a public holiday in factory calendar that needs to become a workday. To remedy this, we put a special rule for the factory calendar and explicitly made that holiday into a workday.  The changes were synchronized with APO, and this is also reflected in the bucket capacity of the resourc: former holiday now has bucket capacity after the calendar change.  However, when running heuristics, it still does not create SNP planned order on that former holiday that has been changed into workday.  Even if it is a public holiday, there is already a special rule for the factory calendar and the resource bucket capacity reflects this correctly. But SNP heuristics seems not to follow this change.
    Any ideas on this? looks like a bug.

    Hi Edgar,
    Yes, when your resource reflects the addional capacity of the holiday turned working day, then it is expected to be considered for the SNP planned order.
    Instead of SNP heuristics, you may try to check interactively in SNP planning book, if manual order creation in the bucket works out.
    Since this is a mutlimix  resource , it can also be checked if in PPDS planned order can be created on the day.
    The above checking may not solve your problem , but will get to know if at least manully the bucket is being considered or not.
    regards
    Datta

  • Planned orders created at APO side are not coming to the ECC

    Hi All,
    I am not getting the planned orders generated in the APO in to the ECC side after running the Product Heuristic. Many times I refreshed the stock requirements at ECC side and also APO side but still the planned orders generate has not come to the ECC. I am just new to APO. It would be great help if somebody can help me can guide/advice me on this.
    Thanks & Regards
    psamp1

    As well as Sajeev's reply, you also need to ensure that the Products and Plants you are planning are in an active integration model and that the transactional data you are expecting is also in an active integration model
    You can check this by using the transaction CFM5 in ECC, enter your products and plants in the general selection options then tick the checkboxes for Materials, Plants and Planned Orders. On execution the system will tell you if they are in an active model or not.

Maybe you are looking for

  • KT4AV floppy disk not working

    Hi, I've tried several floppy disks (all of which work in other computers), and also flashed the bios to the latest version, and cleared the cmos. What I'm still getting is this: I put a floppy disk into the diskdrive (in Windows, in DOS it seems to

  • Wily Instroscope Agent connection problem to Enterprise Manager

    Hello! Perhapse some of you guys deal with this problem before and can give me an hint? I install the Wily Introscope Enterprise Manager and one Agent according to the "Introscope Version 7.0 Installation Guide for SAP" but if i try to start the agen

  • How do you start a discussion?

    I subscribed to Adobe PDF and my account is not Activated.  Reference:  Error Code 43?

  • Problem: after saving endtitle gets unreadable

    Hey there, I have a problem with the endtitle. It rolls from the right side to the left side. If I watch it in Premiere it looks very well, but after saving the movie as an mpeg-file the quality of the movie is great but the endtitle looks terrible..

  • ICloud question with multiple ME e-mail addresses

    Greetings, We are a family of 4. My wife and I use our domain e-mail addresses tied to 1 Apple ID for Apps, mac Appstore, contacts etc. My kids use the same Apple ID but no contacts etc. We separate our contacts on our devices using Groups. I'm wanti