Def Tech 1000 too heavy for mount

I just got around to hanging my 2 front speakers (Definitive Technology 1000s) and it seems as though they are too heavy for the mounts I bought (Def Tech Pro Mount 80). The speakers fall forward. Has anyone else run into this problem? Any suggestions? Thanks very much.

Hey Prince,
I double-checked with Definitive Technology’s website, but it doesn’t appear that the ProMount 80 was designed to support ProMonitor 1000 speakers. In fact, the only accessory that was listed as being compatible was the ProStand 100/200/1000. For additional information though you may want to give Definitive Technology a call at 1-(800)-228-7148. A support rep should be able to provide you some basic troubleshooting support, as well as confirm whether or not you purchased the correct wall mount.
Hope this helps you out.
Aaron|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
 Private Message

Similar Messages

  • HT4972 i have an iphone 4 with ios 5.1.1 and i want to upgrade it to the latest ios 6 and not 7 because its too heavy for iphone 4 how can i do it

    i have an iphone 4 with ios 5.1.1 and i want to upgrade it to the latest ios 6 and not 7 because its too heavy for iphone 4 how can i do it?

    You cannot. When you upgrade, you will get the latest version of iOS 7.

  • I5 27" too heavy for its mount?

    I notice that my 27" i5 steadily creeps down to a perfectly vertical position over the course of a day or two. I'd like to keep it turned slightly upward, like I did with my 24", but so far, it doesn't want to stay. Anyone else experiencing this?

    HI,
    That should not happen. Even if you didn't get AppleCare, contact them regardless.
    http://www.apple.com/support/products/
    Carolyn

  • OCZ Goliath 2 SE too heavy for m/b?

    Hi all,
    has anybody had any problems with this heatsink?
    This is the heaviest heatsink ive ever held.
    Are the stories about heatsinks ripping out cpu's true?
    This is going to be coupled with a delta 80mm on a k7t pro2-a board.
    tia!
    stevensly

    TRIM Enabler support thread:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php&t=1125400
    http://www.groths.org/?p=308
    I don't know that model but I would update the firmware.
    I'd also let the SF controller do its think and not use TE unless you feel it is safe and the current version. That may not have always been true. SF Background GC should be enough. And wipe/reinstall if not.
    As for sleep etc, hibernation is a laptop feature. And even PC BIOS have had to be updated (two PCs, Intel and Gigabyte) and until then it was an issue at times.
    OWC uses SF and does not recommend TRIM for OS X.
    So, what I would say is this:
    When your computer has a hard freeze, it needs you to act/react accordingly:
    Safe Boot at minimum to clean up and attempt to repair its directory.
    Not sure why or what but that can happen to anyone almost and may not even be SSD related.
    I'd keep the drive, check back OCZ and firmware, talk to others on the MacRumors and Groths.
    note: I reformat drives regularly, couple times a year, replace system drive also, and it is the amount of writes and I/O your SSD has to handle, not years. Even DVDs don't last two decades.

  • Alter mount database failing: Intel SVR4 UNIX Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type

    Hi there,
    I am having a kind of weird issues with my oracle enterprise db which was perfectly working since 2009. After having had some trouble with my network switch (replaced the switch) the all network came back and all subnet devices are functioning perfect.
    This is an NFS for oracle db backup and the oracle is not starting in mount/alter etc.
    Here the details of my server:
    - SunOS 5.10 Generic_141445-09 i86pc i386 i86pc
    - Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.2.0
    - 38TB disk space (plenty free)
    - 4GB RAM
    And when I attempt to start the db, here the logs:
    Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 10.2.0.2.0.
    System parameters with non-default values:
      processes                = 150
      shared_pool_size         = 209715200
      control_files            = /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl, /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control02.ctl, /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control03.ctl
      db_cache_size            = 104857600
      compatible               = 10.2.0
      log_archive_dest         = /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/archive
      log_buffer               = 2867200
      db_files                 = 80
      db_file_multiblock_read_count= 32
      undo_management          = AUTO
      global_names             = TRUE
      instance_name            = CATL
      parallel_max_servers     = 5
      background_dump_dest     = /opt/oracle/admin/CATL/bdump
      user_dump_dest           = /opt/oracle/admin/CATL/udump
      max_dump_file_size       = 10240
      core_dump_dest           = /opt/oracle/admin/CATL/cdump
      db_name                  = CATL
      open_cursors             = 300
    PMON started with pid=2, OS id=10751
    PSP0 started with pid=3, OS id=10753
    MMAN started with pid=4, OS id=10755
    DBW0 started with pid=5, OS id=10757
    LGWR started with pid=6, OS id=10759
    CKPT started with pid=7, OS id=10761
    SMON started with pid=8, OS id=10763
    RECO started with pid=9, OS id=10765
    MMON started with pid=10, OS id=10767
    MMNL started with pid=11, OS id=10769
    Thu Nov 28 05:49:02 2013
    ALTER DATABASE   MOUNT
    Thu Nov 28 05:49:02 2013
    ORA-00202: control file: '/opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl'
    ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
    Intel SVR4 UNIX Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type
    Additional information: 45
    Trying to start db without mount it starts without issues:
    SQL> startup nomount
    ORACLE instance started.
    Total System Global Area  343932928 bytes
    Fixed Size                  1280132 bytes
    Variable Size             234882940 bytes
    Database Buffers          104857600 bytes
    Redo Buffers                2912256 bytes
    SQL>
    But when I try to mount or alter db:
    SQL> alter database mount;
    alter database mount
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00205: error in identifying control file, check alert log for more info
    SQL>
    From the logs again:
    alter database mount
    Thu Nov 28 06:00:20 2013
    ORA-00202: control file: '/opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl'
    ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
    Intel SVR4 UNIX Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type
    Additional information: 45
    Thu Nov 28 06:00:20 2013
    ORA-205 signalled during: alter database mount
    We have already checked in everywhere in the system, got oracle support as well without success. The control files are in the place and checked with strings, they are correct.
    Can somebody give a clue please?
    Maybe somebody had similar issue here....
    Thanks in advance.

    Did the touch to update the date, but no joy either....
    These are further logs, so maybe can give a clue:
    Wed Nov 20 05:58:27 2013
    Errors in file /opt/oracle/admin/CATL/bdump/catl_j000_7304.trc:
    ORA-12012: error on auto execute of job 5324
    ORA-27468: "SYS.PURGE_LOG" is locked by another process
    Sun Nov 24 20:13:40 2013
    Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
    control_files = /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl, /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control02.ctl, /opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control03.ctl
    Sun Nov 24 20:15:42 2013
    alter database mount
    Sun Nov 24 20:15:42 2013
    ORA-00202: control file: '/opt/oracle/oradata/CATL/control01.ctl'
    ORA-27037: unable to obtain file status
    Intel SVR4 UNIX Error: 79: Value too large for defined data type
    Additional information: 45
    Sun Nov 24 20:15:42 2013
    ORA-205 signalled during: alter database mount

  • RAM too thick for MacBook?

    Hi everybody---
    I've been reading over the MacBook posts lately, and I've heard that some types of RAM are too thick for the MacBook slots? I am planning on purchasing my MacBook soon, and I would like to upgrade my RAM to 2 GB's. To all those of you who have done the same, will you tell me the manufacturer of your RAM? I just want to make sure when I buy my MacBook, the RAM will fit, and won't be too thick. Thanks!
    Chris

    I also have G.Skill from Newegg. It works great.
    I think a lot of debate and issues come from the fact that usually RAM would have a type of locking mechanism associated with it. Due to how Apple decided to implement their RAM slots they can't have any locking mechanism, it is from what I can tell completely friction based. So as not to have a tech support nightmare from RAM slipping free they made sure there was a lot of friction to hold the chips in place.
    While the G.Skill install was not much more difficult that some other RAM installs I have done, it certainly was not something that an average user would consider comfortable. It takes a lot of pressure, and getting your fingers just that little bit in the slot while pushing that hard is not comfortable.
    Honestly I can't see why Apple didn't just put a surface mount door there. There is plenty of room for it, it could have had normal RAM sockets (the RAM as it is takes up more space anyway since it isn't stacked although stacked RAM may not fit now that the Macbook is 1"), and it would be way easier to install. I'm sure they have some reason, but aesthetics is the only one I can think of, and the thing would be on the bottom which is hardly ever seen...

  • Project too new for final cut 6.0.2 error message

    My colleague at work has edited a rough cut on her Quad Core Intel computer. I'm using a Power Mac G5, and was able to download the project onto my desktop, but I get this message every time I try to open it: "This project is unreadable or may be too new for this version of Final Cut." We're both using FCP 6.0.2, I've done all the software updates I can, but I still receive the message. Does anyone know what I can do?

    Did the person use the same workstation you are using? If you have the other person's volume mounted on your desktop, and you are definitely running the same OS, and you have the same version of FCP, then try opening the original file, not a copy. If it opens, do a *"save as"* instead of using a duplicated copy of the project.
    Also, if they are using a different workstation, they may have another 3rd party component installed that they used, (maybe a filter or codec), that would interfere with it opening. The best way to make sure FibreJet works seemlessly in a multi-station work environment is to make absolutely sure that every station is a clone of the others. If you do an update on one, you have to do it on all. If you add an application, make sure you add it to all stations.
    If you are using a different workstation, try to open it with the other station, then mount your desktop to that station through the LAN, and do a *"save as"* to your desktop, then try opening it from there.
    Of course, do all this after trying to zip it before copying it. It only takes a second and would eliminate one aspect of the possible problem.

  • I have my iTunes library on an external HD because it is too big for my iMAC 500GB HD. I want to backup my external HD. Can I do this with any Apple cloud product or should I look elsewhere? Also is it worth just buying another external HD to back up

    I have my iTunes library on an external HD because it is too big for my iMAC 500GB HD. However, it is not backed up, so I need a solution to backup my external HD. Can I do this with any Apple cloud product or should I look elsewhere for cloud products? Will it be cheaper/easier just to buy another external HD to back up my existing external HD? Thanks

    I don't know if this is me adding files to iTunes when the external wasn't connected
    it is.
    is it OK to just keep deleting that library on the Air?
    i wouldn't - at least not until i
    mount the external
    point iTunes media folder location back to the external via preferences > advanced
    consolidate my library via file > library > organize library
    The ntfs hasn't seem to be causing any problems, but I've always wanted to know.
    in order for your Mac to write to NTFS drives, it needs some help by installing e.g. the NTFS 3G driver. apparently that or something similar is installed on your Mac already. preferably, it would be formatted for Mac but then windows machines would need to have e.g. MacDrive installed to recognize the drive.

  • Too Late for Mac OS Extended Journaled??

    Hi guys! So i got a another firewire HD, 250GB by acomdata. It's formatted under FAT 32 for both windows and mac, after after reading several posts, it's best to format it under mac os extended. the problem is I already put about 30 GB of files on it. Is it too late for me to reformat it? do i have to remove all the files, then do it? If someone can provide step by step instructions that won't harm my files, I'd greatly appreciate it. Thanks!

    You understand that if you reformat the drive for Mac OS Extended that you will no longer be able to use the drive on a PC?
    If you do reformat the drive you need to do so as follows:
    1a (If this is the startup drive.) Boot from your OS X Installer Disk. After the installer loads select Disk Utility from the Installer menu (Utilities menu if using Tiger.) Be sure to use the installer disk for the version of OS X you intend to install.
    1b (If this is a non-startup volume or external drive.) Open Disk Utility in the Utilities folder of your Applications folder.
    2. After DU loads select your hard drive (this is the entry with the mfgr.'s ID and size) from the left side list. Click on the Partition tab in the DU main window.
    3. Set the number of partitions from the dropdown menu (use 1 partition unless you wish to make more.) Set the format type to Mac OS Extended (Journaled, if supported.) Click on the Partition button and wait until the volume(s) mount on the Desktop.
    4. Select the volume you just created (this is the sub-entry under the drive entry) from the left side list. Click on the Erase tab in the DU main window.
    5. Set the format type to Mac OS Extended (Journaled, if supported.) Click on the Options button, check the button for Zero Data and click on OK to return to the Erase window.
    6. Click on the Erase button. The format process will take 30 minutes to an hour or more depending upon the drive size.

  • "This backup is too large for the backup volume" - Info

    Hi there. I had a problem with my time machine and got an error stating "This backup is too large for the backup volume". I did noticed after logging in that TM was indexing in the upper right corner [magnifier with a flashing dot(spotlight)] for a few seconds. So then I went on to "back up now" and it was preparing and then I got the Error message described above. So I uninstalled my anti-virus (you must disable auto protection/or exclude timemachine.app and its plist file (location below)from Anti-virus preferences in the case you have a anti-virus app, otherwise it will take forever to back up.) though that was not my issue. I then turn off time machine and deleted this .plist file in Macintosh HD > Library > Preferences > com.apple.TimeMachine.plist....STOP here if this fixed your problem after restarting. Time machine External Drive in Disk Utility **THESE STEPS WILL ERASE YOUR ENTIRE BACKUPS** ( "Erase" and rename or "partition" to make more that one partition on the External Drive if you wish, and Rename) (Disk utility> Partition tab> "option" you must - guid=intel / apple partition map=PowerPC)...sorry alot of newbie out there...by deleting the "com.apple.TimeMachine.plist" = when you plug in you TM it will ask you if you want to use the drive as a TM back up automatically. This did the trick. But to let you guys know I also used Cocktail (app) and used a feature it has to erase my computers spotlight index and rebuild it. Also in Cocktail, when you have your time machine plugged in you can erase its index and disable it all together. I recommend you first disable spotlight (before the first initial TM backup) in system preferences > spotlight> Privacy (tab) and plus to add time machine ...which has to be mounted (plugged in) to add from window under "Devices".

    http://www.macfixit.com/article.php?story=20090403093528353

  • "Backup is too large for the backup volume" error

    I've been backing up with TM for a while now, and finally it seems as though the hard drive is full, since I'm down to 4.2GB available of 114.4GB.
    Whenever TM tries to do a backup, it gives me the error "This backup is too large for the backup volume. The backup requires 10.8 GB but only 4.2GB are available. To select a larger volume, or make the backup smaller by excluding files, open System Preferences and choose Time Machine."
    I understand that I have those two options, but why can't TM just erase the oldest backup and use that free space to make the new backup? I know a 120GB drive is pretty small, but if I have to just keep accumulating backups infinitely, I'm afraid I'll end up with 10 years of backups and a 890-zettabyte drive taking up my garage. I'm hoping there's a more practical solution.

    John,
    Please review the following article as it might explain what you are encountering.
    *_“This Backup is Too Large for the Backup Volume”_*
    First, much depends on the size of your Mac’s internal hard disk, the quantity of data it contains, and the size of the hard disk designated for Time Machine backups. It is recommended that any hard disk designated for Time Machine backups be +at least+ twice as large as the hard disk it is backing up from. You see, the more space it has to grow, the greater the history it can preserve.
    *Disk Management*
    Time Machine is designed to use the space it is given as economically as possible. When backups reach the limit of expansion, Time Machine will begin to delete old backups to make way for newer data. The less space you provide for backups the sooner older data will be discarded. [http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.5/en/15137.html]
    However, Time Machine will only delete what it considers “expired”. Within the Console Logs this process is referred to as “thinning”. It appears that many of these “expired” backups are deleted when hourly backups are consolidated into daily backups and daily backups are consolidated into weekly backups. This consolidation takes place once hourly backups reach 24 hours old and daily backups reach about 30 days old. Weekly backups will only be deleted, or ‘thinned’, once the backup drive nears full capacity.
    One thing seems for sure, though; If a new incremental backup happens to be larger than what Time Machine currently considers “expired” then you will get the message “This backup is too large for the backup volume.” In other words, Time Machine believes it would have to sacrifice to much to accommodate the latest incremental backup. This is probably why Time Machine always overestimates incremental backups by 2 to 10 times the actual size of the data currently being backed up. Within the Console logs this is referred to as “padding”. This is so that backup files never actually reach the physically limits of the backup disk itself.
    *Recovering Backup Space*
    If you have discovered that large unwanted files have been backed up, you can use the Time Machine “time travel” interface to recovered some of that space. Do NOT, however, delete files from a Time Machine backup disk by manually mounting the disk and dragging files to the trash. You can damage or destroy your original backups by this means.
    Additionally, deleting files you no longer wish to keep on your Mac does not immediately remove such files from Time Machine backups. Once data has been removed from your Macs' hard disk it will remain in backups for some time until Time Machine determines that it has "expired". That's one of its’ benefits - it retains data you may have unintentionally deleted. But eventually that data is expunged. If, however, you need to remove backed up files immediately, do this:
    Launch Time Machine from the Dock icon.
    Initially, you are presented with a window labeled “Today (Now)”. This window represents the state of your Mac as it exists now. +DO NOT+ delete or make changes to files while you see “Today (Now)” at the bottom of the screen. Otherwise, you will be deleting files that exist "today" - not yesterday or last week.
    Click on the window just behind “Today (Now)”. This represents the last successful backup and should display the date and time of this backup at the bottom of the screen.
    Now, navigate to where the unwanted file resides. If it has been some time since you deleted the file from your Mac, you may need to go farther back in time to see the unwanted file. In that case, use the time scale on the right to choose a date prior to when you actually deleted the file from your Mac.
    Highlight the file and click the Actions menu (Gear icon) from the toolbar.
    Select “Delete all backups of <this file>”.
    *Full Backup After Restore*
    If you are running out of disk space sooner than expected it may be that Time Machine is ignoring previous backups and is trying to perform another full backup of your system? This will happen if you have reinstalled the System Software (Mac OS), or replaced your computer with a new one, or hard significant repair work done on your exisitng Mac. Time Machine will perform a new full backup. This is normal. [http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1338]
    You have several options if Time Machine is unable to perform the new full backup:
    A. Delete the old backups, and let Time Machine begin a fresh.
    B. Attach another external hard disk and begin backups there, while keeping this current hard disk. After you are satisfied with the new backup set, you can later reformat the old hard disk and use it for other storage.
    C. Ctrl-Click the Time Machine Dock icon and select "Browse Other Time Machine disks...". Then select the old backup set. Navigate to files/folders you don't really need backups of and go up to the Action menu ("Gear" icon) and select "Delete all backups of this file." If you delete enough useless stuff, you may be able to free up enough space for the new backup to take place. However, this method is not assured as it may not free up enough "contiguous space" for the new backup to take place.
    *Outgrown Your Backup Disk?*
    On the other hand, your computers drive contents may very well have outgrown the capacity of the Time Machine backup disk. It may be time to purchase a larger capacity hard drive for Time Machine backups. Alternatively, you can begin using the Time Machine Preferences exclusion list to prevent Time Machine from backing up unneeded files/folders.
    Consider as well: Do you really need ALL that data on your primary hard disk? It sounds like you might need to Archive to a different hard disk anything that's is not of immediate importance. You see, Time Machine is not designed for archiving purposes, just as a backup of your local drive(s). In the event of disaster, it can get your system back to its' current state without having to reinstall everything. But if you need LONG TERM storage, then you need another drive that is removed from your normal everyday working environment.
    This KB article discusses this scenario with some suggestions including Archiving the old backups and starting fresh [http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.5/en/15137.html]
    Let us know if this clarifies things.
    Cheers!

  • Regexp_replace - too heavy?

    I've got code for extracting numbers from varchar2 column:
    with t1 as (
    select 1 as acode, '100,00' as avalue from dual union all
    select 2 as acode, '100.00' as avalue from dual union all
    select 3 as acode, '100.00%' as avalue from dual union all
    select 4 as acode, '100.00perc' as avalue from dual
    select acode, nvl(abs(regexp_replace(replace(avalue,',','.'),'[^1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,0,.,]')),0) as avalue
    from t1After few weeks of using we received complain, the Customer said that "sometimes" the procedure works too long. He said, it always works about two minutes, but "sometimes" it can work more than 24 hours! He investigated the issue and decided that the problem is regexp_replace (it's too heavy).
    Could you please:
    1) explain to me is it true that regexp_replace is too heavy
    2) give me solution how do I receive the same result without regexp_replace.
    Actually, I'm not trying to prove that regexp_replace is normal. It's a pity, but I can't discuss the issue with the Customer. I'm just trying to understand details for myself.

    with t1 as (
    select 1 as acode, '100,00' as avalue from dual union all
    select 2 as acode, '100.00' as avalue from dual union all
    select 3 as acode, '100.00%' as avalue from dual union all
    select 4 as acode, '100.00perc' as avalue from dual
    select  acode,
            nvl(
                to_number(
                          regexp_replace(
                                         avalue,
                                         '^[^.,0-9]*(\d*)(\.|,){0,1}(\d*).*$',
                                         '\1.\3'
                0
               ) avalue
      from t1
         ACODE      AVALUE
             1         100
             2         100
             3         100
             4         100
    SQL> And with TRANSLATE:
    with t1 as (
    select 1 as acode, '100,00' as avalue from dual union all
    select 2 as acode, '100.00' as avalue from dual union all
    select 3 as acode, '100.00%' as avalue from dual union all
    select 4 as acode, '100.00perc' as avalue from dual
    select  acode,
            nvl(
                to_number(
                          translate(
                                    replace(
                                            avalue,
                                    '0' || translate(
                                                     avalue,
                                                     'A0123456789.,',
                                                     'A'
                                    '0'
                0
               ) avalue
      from t1
         ACODE      AVALUE
             1         100
             2         100
             3         100
             4         100
    SQL> SY.

  • ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column from 9i to 8i

    Hi All,
    Am trying to get the data from 9.2.0.6.0 to 8.1.7.0.0.
    The character sets in both of them are as follows
    9i
    NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET : AL16UTF16
    NLS_CHARACTERSET : AL32UTF8
    8i
    NLS_NCHAR_CHARACTERSET : UTF8
    NLS_CHARACTERSET : UTF8
    And the structure of the Table in 9i which am trying to pull is as follows.
    SQL> desc xyz
    Name Null? Type
    PANEL_SITE_ID NOT NULL NUMBER(15)
    PANELIST_ID NUMBER
    CHECKSUM VARCHAR2(150)
    CONTACT_PHONE VARCHAR2(100)
    HH_STATUS NUMBER
    HH_STATUS_DT DATE
    HH_RECRUITMENT_PHONE VARCHAR2(100)
    HH_RECRUITMENT_DT DATE
    FIRST_NET_USAGE_DT DATE
    INSTALL_DT DATE
    FNAME VARCHAR2(4000)
    LNAME VARCHAR2(4000)
    EMAIL_ADDRESS VARCHAR2(200)
    EMAIL_VALID NUMBER
    PASSWORD VARCHAR2(4000)
    And by connecting to one of the 8i schema am running the following script
    CREATE TABLE GPMI.GPM_HOUSEHOLDBASE_FRMP AS
    SELECT PANEL_SITE_ID,
    PANELIST_ID,
    LTRIM(RTRIM(CHECKSUM)) CHECKSUM,
    LTRIM(RTRIM(CONTACT_PHONE)) CONTACT_PHONE,
    HH_STATUS, HH_STATUS_DT,
    LTRIM(RTRIM(HH_RECRUITMENT_PHONE)) HH_RECRUITMENT_PHONE,
    HH_RECRUITMENT_DT,
    FIRST_NET_USAGE_DT,
    INSTALL_DT, LTRIM(RTRIM(FNAME)) FNAME,
    LTRIM(RTRIM(LNAME)) LNAME,
    LTRIM(RTRIM(EMAIL_ADDRESS)) EMAIL_ADDRESS,
    EMAIL_VALID,
    PASSWORD
    FROM [email protected];
    Am gettinh the following error.
    Can anyone of you fix this one.
    PASSWORD
    ERROR at line 14:
    ORA-01401: inserted value too large for column
    Thanks in Advance
    Sudarshan

    Additionally I found this matrix, which explains your problem:
    UTF8 (1 to 3 bytes) AL32UTF8 (1 to 4 bytes)
    MIN MAX MIN MAX
    CHAR 2000 666 2000 500
    VARCHAR2 4000 1333 4000 1000 */
    For column PASSWORD the maximum length is used (4000). UTF8 uses maximal 3 bytes for a character, while AL32UTF8 may use up to 4 characters. So a column defined in AL32UTF8 may contain characters, which do not fit in a corresponding UTF8 character.

  • How can I perform the conversion of pdf files in Cyrillic script to Word files in Cyrillic script. The pdf file is too small for me to read right now. Julyan Watts

    How can I perform the conversion of .pdf files in Cyrillic script to Word files in Cyrillic script. The .pdf file is too small for me to read without a magnifying glass, and the document is more than one thousand pages.

    This answer was not helpful. First of all, I could not find "tech specs"
    anywhere on the Acrobat 11 homepage. And secondly I purchased this software
    for the specific purpose of converting .pdf files to Word. It was only
    after I had completed the purchase that I learnt that Acrobat does not
    permit the conversion of .pdf files in Cyrillic to Word files  in Cyrillic.
    I feel that Acrobat should have provided this crucial information before I
    allowed my credit card to be debited. That is why I  am now asking for my
    money back. But thanks for your attempt to solve my problem, even if it was
    not successful.
    Julyan Watts

  • EBS - Error F5 263 (Diff is too large for clearing)

    Helli Experts,
    We are implementing SAP Electronic bank statement functionality.  One of the requirements of the business is that of automatic clearing of customer open items after import of MT940.
    We are using standard interpretation algorithm 001, but made use of an enhancement to clear the open items based on age of the open items rather than any reference given in Note to Payee details.  That means if a customer has 4 overdue open items and paid the amount referring to the 3rd open item, system should rather clear the 1st open item which is overdue for more number of days than the 3rd open item.  This has been made possible by activating the check box "Distribute by age" in FEBCL table through the standard enhancement option given by SAP.
    As an extension of this requirement, if the customer pays off in lumpsum (in single payment) for the combination of first three open items, then the system should clear off those three open items leaving the fourth one as the open item.  For instance first open item has the amount of $ 1000, 2nd one has $2000, 3rd one has $3000 and 4th one has $4000.  Now if the customer pays $6000, system should clear the 1st, 2nd and 3rd open items automatically after loading the bank statement containing this payment of $6000.  So, only the 4th one will be in open item status.
    But when I load the bank statement, system is giving me an error message F5 263 (the difference is too large for clearing) in posting area 2.  Posting area 1 is fine and document is successfully posted.  Issue is there only in posting area 2.  I believe system should be able to find the first three open items for the amount of $6000 based on the indicator of "Distribute by age".  But this is not happening.  If I try to reprocess the statement through FEBAN after I got this error message, then system is able to find the first three open items and then able to clear off.  But wondering why it is not happening in transaction FF.5 automatically.
    So, could you kindly let me know if I am missing something or is it a limiation in SAP that this scenario is not possible to achieve through EBS.
    Thanks in advance.
    Sridhar

    Hi Experts,
    Using standard BAdI the requirements could be solved.  Thanks.
    Regards,
    Sridhar

Maybe you are looking for