Default confirmation control key 0004 for UB type.

Hi guys,
I am trying to default the conf control keey 0004 (inbound delivery) for UB STO.
Our process is to cretae STR then automatically convert them into STO.
When Create a PIR for STO with conf contrl key and you refer this PIR into your STO it will bring the conf control key 004.
But now the question is how do I default this PIR into the STO??? keep in mind that it is a UB type ...
Cheers
Julien

Hi,
I did assign the conf ctrl key in the vendor (supplying plant) it s actually not defaulting in the STO.
Cheers
Julien

Similar Messages

  • Confirmation Control Key 0004

    Hi Gurus,
    When I am activating "Confirmation control key 0004" in the existing Scheduling Agreements(created with reference to contracts) system is giving the error "Confirmation control key 0004 not allowed" .
    So kindly let me know will system accepts the confirmation if the schedules already partially delivered?
    Regards,
    A.S.K

    Hi,
    You cannot change the confirmation control key if partial delivery exists for that SA
    Refer this Link
    http://www.sap-img.com/materials/explain-about-the-po-confirmation-control-key-in-detail.htm
    Edited by: redriver on Dec 13, 2011 12:34 PM

  • Confirmation control key check for inbound delivery creation

    Hi,
    Currently, in the Client's company, the process of receiving goods from purchase orders looks like that (SAP-wise):
    - create a purchase order,
    - receive goods using MIGO and automatically create an inbound delivery,
    - pack the delivery and post goods receipt.
    Recently, some patches have been installed, including one described by note 1602047 (which basically enforces checking confirmation control keys if goods receipt assignment and goods receipt relevance are activated for inbound deliveries). Note says that it only affects two-step stock transfer and creation of automatic inbound deliveries using SPED output but it seems it also affects other basic processes like PO receipt in MIGO.
    Now, when using the old control key (that had MRP-Relevant and GR-Relevant fields checked), the system is unable to automatically create an inbound delivery after the goods receipt is posted with MIGO (with message VL148 - Not possible to create an inbound delivery). I learned that this is because the "GR Assignment" field must be checked in the confirmation control key so it's possible to automatically create aninbound delivery after receiving a purchase order in MIGO.
    After changing the confirmation control key to have the missing field checked it's not possible anymore to receive goods from PO in MIGO as the PO requires shipping notification in order to be processed in MIGO thus requiring of manual creation of an inbound delivery.
    Is there any way to skip this check so the process would remain the same (this model has been working fine for few years in the Client's system) and the inbound delievery would be created automatically after posting the receipt in MIGO?
    Thanks in advance,
    Piotr

    Hi,
    don't know if you found a solution, but we received the following message from SAP:
    The advent of the new version requires some attention to the users. It
    was necessary to avoid inconsistencies which in the past version the
    system was susceptible.
    Main Program SAPMM07M
    Source code of MM07MLVS
    sy-msgid VL sy-msgty E sy-msgno 148
    I have checked the process and through debugged I could confirm the
    following information SAP is providing to all similar incidents reportedfor us:
    Error message VL 148 is issued if in the confirmation control key used
    in the purchase order, the fields for MRP-relevance (T163G-KZDIS),
    GR relevance (T163G-WEREL) and GR assignment indicator (T163G-WEZUO)
    are not set.
    The correction of note 1602047 was necessary to avoid inconsistencies
    (table EKES) in the purchase order. Without having the GR assignment
    (T163G-WEZUO) set, there is no unique reference created between the
    purchase order history (table EKBE) and the inbound delivery
    confirmation (table EKES) at goods receipt which leads to a problem if
    several inbound deliveries exist for the same purchase order.
    If you set T163G-WEZUO to 'X', this assures that, for an inbound
    delivery, the confirmation record (EKES) belonging to this inbound
    delivery (EKES-VBELN) is also accurately updated at goods receipt.
    How to solve the issue?
    Use a confirmation control key with the GR assignment indicator set
    and then create the inbound delivery with VL31N. If you want to be able
    to create the inbound delivery with reference to a certain line item in
    the PO, use transaction VL34.
    If you still want to use transaction MIGO, there is the following
    workaround:
    - Create a purchase order without any confirmation control key
    - Create a goods receipt (GR) in transaction MIGO with reference to this PO and post the GR to a non-HU-managed storage location
    - Create a transfer posting with MIGO using movement type 311 to
    transfer the goods from the non-HU-managed storage location to the
    HU-managed storage location.
    As the transfer posting is an additional step for the user, the whole
    process could be automated using a partner storage location
    (T001l-PARLG) for the GR which then triggers (through a modification)
    the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' to create the transfer posting without
    user interaction.
    I hope to have satisfied you on the reason why it is now happening and
    also I believe you can explain to business that it is a new behavior
    necessary done from SAP side to avoid worse situations, we are aware of
    potential dissatisfaction it might cause. SAP Support is always
    available to clarify any issue.
    Sorry for not having a more positive answer.
    I hope it helps!
    Leentje

  • Default values for confirmation control key

    Dear forum
    I am using a confirmation control key 0004 Shipping notification (standard SAP) in the Purchase order line item (created with ME21n).
    When I enter the confirmation data (with transaction ME22n) in the purchase order line item (confirmations tab), I have to type in delivery date, quantity and so on manually, which is standard.
    But, what if I want to copy the original delivery date and quantity from the line item in the order, and use this as default value for the line item confirmation data...is it possible somehow?
    The reason why I want to do this is for the user not having to go in and update this date manually all the time, but only when the confirmed dates/quantities differ from the desired delivery date and quantities in the purchase order line item. We are not on EDI or using Inbound deliverys for Purchase orders.
    Thanks
    Ola

    Hi,
    The Confirmation is nothing but the acknowledgement.So, its usually entered manuallly by the authorised User allowing follow on documents for Purchase Order.
    You can chesk once the customisation of Confiramtion control keys for automatic update indicator.
    Yes, you can use User Exit and develop with the help of ABAPERS.
    Hope it will help you.
    Regards,
    Smitha

  • Confirmation control key update in PO

    Hi,
    I am using POs with confirmation control key 0004 (inbound delivery). When I create an inbound delivery for a PO the correct confirmation record with key LA is written to the PO. When I then change the inbound delivery and add a batch split for the material and save the inbound again, the confirmation control record changes to AB records. for the Why is this happening and how can I prevent this so that the LA record in the conf. control tab of the PO stays unchanged?
    thanks a lot!

    Hi,
    Check Tcode OMGZ.
    Check delivery type assigned to confirmation category.
    Rgds
    Utsav

  • Confirmation Control Key Should be mandatory for PO document type

    Hi All,
    I want to know, is there any configuration settings to make mandatory "confirmation control key" for the Particular Purchasing document type's.
    If it is not there what should be the best to achieve this requirement.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Shankar.

    Hi
    I think there is no standard setting to make mandatory document "confirmation control key" for the Particular Purchasing document type's.
    Best way is to maintain in Purchasing view of vendor master record since confirmations rare sent by the vendor.If you want for some perticular materials you can maintain in Purchasing info record.
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • Determine Confirmation Control Key for UB STO

    Hi,
    For NB PO's, the confirmation control key (CCK) can be determined by the vendor.
    How can I determine the CCK for a UB STO when I am using a supplying plant instead vendor?
    CD

    Hi,
    Normally the confirmation control key will be defaulted from the config maintained at sprommpurchasing--confirmations for NB or UB.
    Regards,

  • "Inbound deliveries for PO reciepts with confirmation control keys"

    Hi Gurus,
    Can somebody tell me the detailed configuaration steps " Inbound deliveries for PO reciepts with confirmation control keys".
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi,
    Del. type is identified in
    OLME-Confirmations-Define Internal Confirmation Categories
    Del. item catogery is defined in TCode 0184.
    Based on Del. type & item cat. grp in Material master
    Goods Recieving point (shipping point) against Plant & SLOC is defined in
    Logistics Execution-Shipping-Basic Shipping Functions-Shipping Point and Goods Receiving Point Determination-Assign Goods Receiving Points for Inbound Deliveries

  • Difference in confirmation control key 0001 and 0004

    Hello,
    What is the difference between Confirmation control key 0001 and 0004?,and what is the use and when it can be used.?
    What is the Rough GR , and when it can be used , for what purpose.?
    Regards
    Sapman man

    Answered

  • Mass change for field Confirmation control Key in PO / SA

    Dear All,
    There is a need to do mass change in value for field Confirmation control Key in PO / SA. Some of them have PO history. If we have PO history system wont allow to change conf. ctrl key. Also since it is a production system we can not cancel previous po histories. This is in SAP 4.7 where we dont have mass change tcode for Scheduling agreements.
    Can we maintain the values thru table entries. like using se16n maintain entries check box. This option is greyed out. can we activate that & do this requirement.
    please suggest.

    hi Greetings!
    The confirmation control key can not be changed in the scheduling agreement if GR for item had already been posted. If the GRs can be canceled , it is possible to change the confirmation control in the SA item.
    Version 4.7 do not support Mass change of scheduling agreements, hence you have to either create a SCAT or BDC to perform the task.
    Gobinathan G

  • How to create inbound delivery for items with no confirmation control key.

    hi Please help me with this..
    are there any user exits to create an inbound delivery for scheduling agreement items with no confirmation control key.
    my req is
    i have 12 items (me33 transaction) of them three have confirmation control key populated and out of those three 2 will be deleted so only one item is left for inbound delivery creation, but i need to have all this possible for all items with or without confirmation control key.
    thank you

    hi
    for inbound delivery there is BAdi called LE_SHP_DELIVERY_PROC... in there is method called ITEM_DELETION... in this u can flag the item to delete or not..
    this will be triggered for inbound as well as oubound delivery..
    you can check confirmation status for the PO in the table EKES... in this table there is filed called EBTYP.. using this field u can check the PO item confirmation status..
    I hope above information is helpuful for u

  • Confirmation control key automatically defaulted not from supplier, nor PIR, nor user exit

    Hi gurus
    I have the confirmation control key automatically defaulting in the PO but it is not coming from the vendor master data, nor PIR nor from user exit.
    Do you know from where it can be defaulted? I have noticed that if change the company code then it defaults but if change to another want then the field is blank, so it seems that there is something configured at company code level, but not sure what it could be
    thanks so much
    Ivan

    Then you need to analyze thoroughly all the PIR'S and vendor master which are linked to scheduling agreement or contract where you are maintaining the control key.
    And also any new functionality added in your PO functionality debug and check the same with ABAPER it will be easy way you can now from where exactly the confirmation control key is populating in PO.

  • Confirmation control key determination In PO

    Hi Experts ,
    Kindly suggest how confirmation control key is determined in purchase order ?
    My requirement is like ,  if i have  PO  with different document type i need to have different confirmation control keys
    How can i achieve this ?
    Thanks in advance
    Jinoy

    Hi,
    Condition control keys are setup generic to the purchasing documents, viz. PO, Outline Agreements.
    The control key defaults on the purchasing document from the record source assigned for the purchasing line items. Control key defaults from Info. Record or Outline Agreement or from Vendor Master Record, if the control key is specified in these.
    Eg. If There is no info. record or Outline agreement exist as a source for a particular Purchase item, then the control key would default from Vendor Master record of the Purchasing document.
    Regards
    Prasan

  • Purchase order confirmation control key issue

    Hi,
    We have an issue about vendor confirmation control key in transactions ME21N/ME22N
    We have custom document types defined , ZNB - this is normal purchase order for external vendors and ZSTO - this is stock transfer orders between plants belonging to our corporation.
    For ZNB we can introduce the confirmation control keys with no problem.
    But when we try to introduce the confirmation control key for the ZSTO document type, the value is simply ignored and the field is reset to blank (NO error message)
    My question what can be the reason for this , probably there is some customizing setup that creates this behaviour but I cannot find it.
    Thanks
    H.Z.

    I put this succesive screen shots, first I select the confirmation key and after pressing enter the field is reset to blank .....
    I was trying to find also user exista but with no success so far ....
    Thanks
    H.Z.

  • Confirmation control key-Make option

    Hi,
    In the field selction key(define screen layout at docuement level) of docuemnt type MK(Qty contract),I made as optional for confirmation control key .But While creating qty contract,still it is mandatory field for confirmation control key.How to make optional field of confirmation control key   in the contract.
    Can somebody throw light on this,please ?
    Regards,
    Jaheer.

    Hi
    In the field selction key(define screen layout at docuement level) of docuemnt type, you have to check all the feild selection like
    AKTH , ME31 , MKK (Qty Contract) ,if any of the feild selection if the confirmation control is reqired entry ,then while creatiog contract it will reflect,
    Check these feild selection keys if the confirmation control is active, and also check if you have created any new feild selection keys if the confirmation control is active.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Adobe Flash Player Plugin Problem (Not listed)

    Installed latest Adobe Flash Player, continually have to enable and disable if for YouTube I have tried uninstalling and re-installing and Firefox itself too, got all the updates. When going to full screen viewing I get a blank white screen..This I h

  • E-Mail for background Job

    Hi All, We need to schedule a Job in background in every 30 min or 1 hr, which will monitor all the other Jobs running in background. If any job is running more than 30000 sec, it should trigger an email. Please guide me how to achieve this( i'm ABAP

  • Classes, and constructors and instance variables . . . oh my!

    wow, I am really struggling with the stuff we are doing in class for the last few days. I am going to post our assignment and point out specific things I don't understand. I don't understand some of the syntax and the overall logical flow of how para

  • In a ADG is it possible to have a pie chart in a summary row?

    In a ADG is it possible to have a pie chart in a summary row? The segments would be worked out from a funtion applied to the data in that grouping. Thanks :)

  • Master page scripting

    Hi experts, I have the following requirement - can you provide a sample solution for the same - I have two Master Pages say MP1 and MP2 – (created because logo alignment is different in the two setups) I have restricted the MP1 occurrence only to the