Default costing sheet

Dear All,
In COR1,while creating Process order, i want to make my cost sheet ex CSDF1 as default in the control tab for costing. How can i do this???
Regards
Vasantha

Hi,
The Costing sheet that appears in your Process order is driven by the Costing Variant maintained in the Order type Parameters in the Config.
T Code: COR4 :
Menupath : IMG> Production Planning for Process Industries > Process Order> Master Data> Order > Define order type Parameters.
In this you have a Tab called Controlling wherein you will maintain the costing variant. If the costing variant which you use has the costing sheet which you desired to have in the Order, you can maintain the same in this place.
Hope this should help you.
Regards
Nambi

Similar Messages

Costing Sheet on QM Orders

We recently upgraded from 4.5b to ECC 6.0. Prior to the upgrade, we did not have costing sheets on our QM orders (they settle to other cost objects which then get overhead). However, since the upgrade, these orders have been automatically given costing sheets and overhead keys. (The costing sheet is the same on each order, but there are differing overhead keys.) Of course, this is causing duplication of overhead on these costs.
I cannot find how the costing sheet and OH keys are getting onto the orders.
I have looked OPL8, but this order type is not in this configuration. I have also checked the planning profile - this order type does not have a planning profile that defaults, but I can't see if the users are manually entering one. I have looked at tables VIQMEL for the Quality Notification and COAS for the QM order, but don't see anything that gives me an answer.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thank you!

Hi,
You have to first understand the functionality of costing sheet in SAP.
It is used to calculate or Load overheads to the inventory of Finished goods/semi finished goods.
Irrespective of how many process orders your client creates, with the help of one costing sheet you can calculate the overheads for all the process orders at the month end and then do month end activity.
In short you desing the logic of applying overheads on some basis either at percentages or quantity.
The base can be material, Labour, etc.
Hope this clarifies.
Thanks,
Ravi Kumar

Costing sheet in control tab of production order

In OPL8 iam able to configure default cost accountings for production order type but why costing sheet is coming by default in production order costing section.
Is there anyway to hide that costing sheet (AUFK-KALSM) from display to the users without effecting any cost calculation in the background.
The purpose behind this is not to let users mess with costing sheet selection while creation. this is possible with screen variant but is there any standard settings for order type?
Thanks in advance.

Dear Sprint,
No
In my understanding we do not not have any Std setting for archiving your requirement
Use screen variant or check for any exit
Regards
Madhu

Overhead costing sheet in easy cost planning

Hello,
I have created a overhead costing sheet (having base as material cost elements where a %age is defined to be applied on the material cost) and attached it to the valuation variant of easy cost planning in PS module.
Now for a given project when I am checking the easy cost planning, it is showing all individual lines of resources like material etc. along with its qty, price and value but I can not see the effect of the %age specified in overhead costing sheet.
Kindly suggest what is to be done.
Also pl. let me know whether I can see the cost component structure of easy cost planning.
With Thanks and Regards
Ratna

Hello,
Thanks for your reply.
But when I run CJ46 for a particular WBS element, it says "The object is not relevant for processing".
I have created the costingsheet as per the process mentioned below.
For overhead costing sheet, base is created with raw material cost elements range and origin group range.
Overhead rate is defined with dependency D020 - Overhead Type/Plant as 1.5% with proper validity period.
Credity key is defined with secondary cost element with category 41 and cost center and fixed % with default "*".
The above costing sheet is attached to the valuation variant of easy cost planning in PS module.
There is a cost component structure 10 which is attached to costing variant PS06.
Still CJ46 gives message as "The object is not relevant for processing" when I run it for particular WBS element.
Kindly suggest whether I m missing any other step.
With Thanks and Regards.
Ratna

Change of Costing Sheet Assignment

Dear Experts,
We have assigned costing sheet to valuation variant and valuation variant is assigned to costing variant.
This costing variant is assigned to order type for production orders. Now we have created new costing sheet and assigned to valuation variant, but at the time of creation of production order system is showing old costing sheet. Is there any another configuration whrere costing sheet is made default to valuation variant.
regards,
shashi

Hi Shashi,
There is specific config. step you are missing.Is it behaviour with single order or for all order in that plant? and are you sure new config has been transported to specified client.
Plz. do confirm.
Regards,
Ashok

Incorrect costing sheet in service orders

Hi All,
We have one issue with service orders (T-code: IW32 ) setup.We have processed many service orders in system
and recently we came to know that there is incorrect cost sheet derived into all the service order from the defaulted cost values of plant and order type.
Now we want to do the proper setup for correct costing sheet for that plant and order type relationship .
Can you please help us of process setups to follow to correct the costing sheet for this requirement and what is the impact on posted service order with incorrect service orders.
Thanks
Rishai

Hello Risha,
Me also facing a similar issue
Can you please share the solution for this thread
Thanks,
Satya

Costing sheet in productin order

Hi,
When we are creting production order system is not taking the costing sheet automatically. But we confiugured all the things properly. We configured order type, cost component structure, costing variant, valuation variant everything. Please guide me on default assignment of costing sheet to production order or order type.
Sateesh Kumar

Hi Sateesh,
Try this
IMG--ControllingInternal OrdersActual Postings-- Overhead Rates---- Maintain Costing Sheet and Overhead Key in Sample Orders
You enter the following in the model order:
Costing sheet
Overhead key
If you use the model order so defined as a reference order for an order type, the costing sheet entered in the model order and the overhead key are also used for this order type.
Hope this helps
Regards
Pratiksha

FX Revaluation with default Cost Object Assignment

Hello,
When we run the FX revaluation program FAGL_FC_Val, SAP books one side to
the balance sheet account and the other side to the P&L account for
unrealized FX Loss/Gain. Since this account is also created as a cost
element, it requires a cost object. However, FX revaluation program posts
the entry without a cost object. We have tcode OKB9 - Default Cost Center
Assignment but SAP does not take values from it.
We are on ECC 6.0
Any assistance is sincerely appreciated.
sumit

Hi,
if the P&L account for unrealized FX Loss/gain is created as cost element a posting can only take place if there is a cost object assigned.
You wrote "However, FX revaluation program posts the entry without a cost object" but thats not possible. There must be a cost object, maybe not the one you are expecting...
Maybe the OKB9 entry is maintained for comp. code A the FX valuation is done for comp. code B? Maybe there is a substituion rule created that changes the OKB9 default cost object?
Please check, and come back.
best regards, Christian

Error while entering the Overhead percentage 0.3693 in Costing Sheet

HI,
While defining costing sheet in the system,i need to give the overhead percentage as 0.3692 as per the client requirement.but the system is giving the below error.
Input should be in the form __,___,__~.___V
Message no. 00088
Diagnosis
Your entry does not match the specified input format.
System response
The entry in this field was rejected.
Procedure
The entry must comply with the edit format. The following edit format characters have a special meaning:
"_" (underscore)
There should be an input character at this point; this should be a number for numeric fields.
"." (decimal point) (applies to numeric fields)
The decimal point occurs here (setting in the user master record).
"," (thousands separator) (applies to numeric fields)
This separator occurs (optionally) for more than three figures. Depending on the setting in the user master record, it can be a period or a comma.
"V" (applies to numeric fields)
The operational sign appears here. If used, it must by at the right margin of the field. The sign is either "-" or " "(space).
"~" (tilde) (applies to numeric fields)
As of and including this character, leading zeros must also be entered. Otherwise, this character has the same meaning as an underscore. Leading zeros need not be entered on the left of the tilde. They are not output at this position.
All other characters have their normal meanings and must be entered in the same position as in the edit format.
Thanks
Sunitha

hi Sunitha,
this error is related to Decimal Format pls check your setting in country
For 4.7C
SPRO > IMG > General Setting > Define countries in mySAPsystem
For ECC 6.0
SPRO > IMG > SAP Netweaver > General Setting > Define countries in mySAPsystem
select your countries and double click in that there is last field for Decimal Pt. format check that format and try to enter value according to that format because in error it showing 4 decimal and there you may have maintained in two decimal. also check decimal currecy setting. One more reason could be there instead of full stop you may have maintained comma in setting.
thx.
Ganu

Costing Sheet Overhead Rate Change Mid Month

Does SAP Support a mid month overhead rate change in a costing sheet? I have an overhead rate change effective 5/12/2007, but my PM Order is not recognizing the change unless the Basic Start Date of the order is 6/1/2007.

hi
it will not support mid month overhead. it should be either period basis or yearly basis.
regards,
siva

Costing Sheet & Percentage OH Dependancy

Dear All,
Our client has 3 plants & 3 business areas corresponding to each plant.
Now while creating overhead percentage rates, we need to mention Dependacy like OH Type/plant or OH Type/Business area.
My questions are-
a) Which dependancy to be used in the given scenario?
b) We have identified 3 OH rates viz. Production OH, Admn OH & Sales & distn OH. We are creating 3 Costing Sheets. So how many OH rates should be created? Is it 3 OH rates & the dependancy will take into account different % rates as per plant or Business Area? or Should we create 3 x 3 = 9 OH Rates for each Costing Sheet?
Eagerly awaiting for your reply,
Gov

Hi jayram,
I ll give the scenario.
Plant 1000 Business Area 1000
Plant 2000 Business Area 2000
Plant 3000 Business Area 3000
Overheads - 1) Production OH
2) Admin OH
3) Sales & Distn OH
So we felt that we should create 3 costing sheets. It was thought with the intention that we will have 3 different OH percentages. That time I forgot this dependancy factor.
After taking into account your point, I feel that we can work with only one costing sheet. Are you suggesting the same?
Will it take care of different OH percentages in different business areas? Here as shown earlier, the business area is same as plant. So the OH % is same,even you take into account plant or business area.
I think we have to create 3 costing variants & valuation variants for 3 plants.
So from this, what will you suggest?
Thanks,
Gov

Contents of new costing variant, valuation variant and costing sheet not getting transported

In our development client,I have created a new costing variant, a new valuation variant and a new costing sheet in separate transports.
When I release the transports to move into the Test client, the contents of the configuration are not getting transported at all.
I tried to do them again manually using Table view - Transport , but again, if I view the transports in SE10,they don't show the table contents, etc.
Any help on this will be highly appreciated.

Ajay,
Let me make sure I understand.
Create a new TR using SE01
Go to transaction OKKN (costing variant)
Select the costing variant and then choose Table view - transport
Provide the transport number
At what point to I say 'include in request'
If I try to use the menu option Edit-Transport-Include in request in the beginning itself, the 'Include in request' is greyed out.
This is where I'm stuck

Selection of Costing Sheet in Production Order

Hi friends,
I have one query, details of which are as follows.
Costing sheet in Requirement Class - Blank
This requirement class assigned to Requirement type which was derived in Sales order through Material master and hence Costing sheet in Sales order is blank.
Costing Sheet in Valuation variant (Plan) is Z0010 which is assigned to Costing Variant (Plan). It was assigned to Order type.
Costing sheet in Valuation variant (Actual) is Z0020 which is assigned to Costing variant (Actual). It was assigned to Order type.
I have created a new Valuation variant T01 in which Costing sheet is blank. It was assigned to a Particular Plant.
When i am creating the Production order with reference to the Sales order in that Particular plant, system is deriving the Costing sheet as per Valuation variant (Plan) which is common instead of picking from the plant specific valuation variant.
So, its calculating overheads and is impacting our Goods receipt valuation (In this plant, GR Valuation is as per Plan cost of the Production order).
I tried different combinations, and finally observed that it is picking the Costing sheet from the valuation variant (Plan) which is common and not Plant specific.
Is this system behavior correct as per SAP Standard?
Kindly advise on the same
Regards
Madhusekhar Gupta G

Hi Madhu
1. Production order gets coating sheet from the valuation variant assigned to order type
2. The valuation variant that you assign to Plant is for standard cost estimate only
3. For your case, create a new costing variant without costing sheet and assign the same to the order type for this plant
You can assign different costing variant to the same order type per plant
Br. Ajay M

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

Default cost center not appearing for certain users

Hi Gurus,
We are on SRM 4.0 classic scenario.
For certain users when they create SC in SRM the default cost center is not automatically taken into account even if they change it to it. The default cost center was changed for these users and some of them still refer to the old cost center no. which was maintained for them.
The users are not defective and the except the cost center all other attributes work fine. I have tested by deleting & recreating new BP no. for the users but it still doesnt help. Please advise.
BR,
Sambit

hi
check if the users are correctly mapped into org structure (ppoma_bbp)
than check if theri Position are correctly mapped with the default cost center (ppoma_bbp; tab attributes; cost center
regards
andrea

Default costing sheet

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for