Default logical system names for application and metadata in models.

hi,
I have a dbt in web dynpro java. When we create a model, we give the logical system names. When our developement is over, do we have to change these names because in test system and subsequently production system, the backends will be oviously different than developement ?
how do we change them and re import after changing? in abap we cant change our code in test and prod systems right so how is it in web dynpro java ?
thanks

Hi Jeschael,
thanks for the reponse.
When I create the model, I give the default logical system names and on the next screen I give the
ip address of the backend system, client , login, password etc
Even though the logical system names wud be same in Dev, Test and Prod systems, the ip address, login password is different so how do I give it ?
thanks
B

Similar Messages

Changing the default logical system names for adaptive RFC models

Hello,
When I create an Adaptive RFC model the dialog that asks me to specify the model name, package, source folder, etc. has default values in the "Default logical system name for model instances" and "... RFC metadata".
I know I can type in another name there but I'd like to change the default name to something that fits our naming conventions. Can I change that? If so, can someone tell me where?
Thanks in advance!
David.

Suresh,
Thank you for your response. However, that is not what I was looking for. Sorry if my post was not clear.
I knew that I could change it AFTER the import. I also know that I can type in something else besides the default DURING the import.
What I am asking is if there is a way to change some configuration setting so that the 'default' that comes up in the drop down DURING the import is something different than what comes 'out-of-the-box' with NWDS.
Hope that clears up what I'm looking for.
David.
Message was edited by:
David Z. Pantich

Changing Default logical system names of a model.

Hi
    How could i change the
     Default logical system name for model instances:
     Default logical syatem name for RFC metadata:
    values for existing model? without recreating the model.
     Thanx

Hi shah kond,
you can change rfc destinations of model in 2 differnet ways.
firs one: right clcik on project
          from the context menu select propeties
          it will open a dialogbox from that select dynpro references then click on jco references tab
by using add and remove buttons u can add and remove joc destnations
2.expand ur model class double click output class.now seelct properties view.there u can change the jco destination
hope this will use ful for u
Regards
Naidu

Finding "Default Logical System Name Model Instance" in DC Project

Hi,
While Creating an Adaptive RFCModel, one defines the
Default Logical System Name for Model Instance & the
Default Logical System Name for RFCMetadata.
In which file can I find these settings at a later stage in the Project File Structure.
Ofcourse, I can view them in the WedynproContentAdministrator under the Jco Destinations.
But is there anyway to access them in the NWDS?
Regards
MK

Hello MK,
You'll find the Logical System Names of the JCo destinations in the file ".wdproperties" under the project structure.
Bala

Same logical system name for two productive systems - BW, PI issues

Dear all,
we have a productive system which serves two companies (different company codes). This system is connected both to BW and PI for both companies.
There is a requirement that these two companies must use their own system, so the whole landscape (dev,qa,prd) will be copied to different systems (different server with different system id).
As a result of the above procedure we wll have two different productive systems, as required, but we wll have the same logical system name for the two productive systems, which must be both connect to bw and PI.
However as far as I know:
- we cannot connect systems with same logical system name to BW,PI
- we cannot convert logical system name of the one of the two productive systems as they are productive and so this is not supported.
How can we overcome the problem?
Please advice.

> However as far as I know:
> - we cannot connect systems with same logical system name to BW,PI
> - we cannot convert logical system name of the one of the two productive systems as they are productive and so this is not supported.
Right.
> How can we overcome the problem?
Since you split up systems (or plan to) I highly recommend booking an SLO service (http://service.sap.com/slo). Those people have to the tools and the knowlege to help you. I would not do this on my own.
Markus

Giving logical system name for PI 7.11 system

Hi,
how can i give logical system name for PI 7.11?
Thanks.

Check if this helps http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/aa/b4b13b00ae793be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
if you are loking for naming conventing : use CLNT{client no.} eg: PIDCLNT001
Regards,
Srinivas

Logical system name for this BI is not allowed

Working under Data Warehouse Workbench, when I click BI Content button, I get pop-up: "Logical system name for this BI is not allowed". Then I get three options from NW system: "Create", "Assign" or "Cancel".
What can I do? How to create a new Logical System?
Thanks,
Mike

Refer this link to create a Logical System...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/aa/b4b13b00ae793be10000000a11402f/content.htm

Logical system name for acknowledgement in BPM

Hi,
I have a szenario:
IDOC --> BPM --> MAIL
Inside BPM I check the message and depending on an xml-element I stop the process or I send the message by mail.
When I stop the process the BPM sends back an acknowledgement and in SXMB_MONI I can see an error of the acknowledgement:
"Sender Test_BPM_IDOC_TO_MAIL kann nicht in ein ALE Logisches System umgeschlüsselt werden" (Sender can not convert in a ALE logical system)
What can I do?
Possible Solution 1:
I can define my BPM "Test_BPM_IDOC_TO_MAIL" as a logical system (including WE20 for ALEAUD).
Possible Solution 2:
I can enter an existing logical system name in the "adapter specific attributes".
BUT it is not use the same logical system name twice (BAD ... or is there a workaround?
Is Solution 1) a common way?
Thanx
Regards
Wolfgang Hummel

Hi,
there are many ways:
some for aleaud are described in my book:
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2006/10/11/xi-new-book-mastering-idoc-business-scenarios-with-sap-xi">Mastering IDoc Business Scenarios with SAP XI</a>
>>>>Is Solution 1) a common way?
no this is not good a good idea
BTW
you can also supress aleaud raport IDX_NOALE
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions">XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</a>

SLD: Adjust / Add logical system name for Business System [XI 3.0]

Hi,
In the System Landscape Directory, is it possible to adjust the logical system name of an already created business system?
I found in the content maintenance in Subset="All Classes", Class=SAP_BCClient" --> <MY_BUSINESSSYSTEM_ENTRY> the only possibility to add information on the logical system name of a business system.
Unfortunately, the information provided in the BCClient Entry is not forwarded to the Business System Entry for my Business System in the Business Landscape View of the SLD...
Is there another possibility to add the logical system name to an exisiting business system?
Regards
Kristian

In a third party business system, it is not possible to add a logical system, but you can delete the business system and recreate it with the same name without problems.
After assigning a new logical system to a business system, you have to go to the integration directory and reload the logical system for the business system. Therefore open the Business System in change mode and maintain the Logical System with menu service -> Adapterspecific Identifiers.
Regards
Stefan

Defining Logical System name for ALE using T.C- SPRO?

Hi,
Can anybody tell, how to define logical system name using T.C SPRO?
Where can I find the "Define Logical System for ALE"?
Thanks
Balaji

HI,
Use the SALE transaction , there you can have all steps clearly,
please see the below links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cdded790-0201-0010-6db8-beb9bb2b2660
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/12/22/file-to-multiple-idocs-xslt-mapping
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/06/24/convert-any-flat-file-to-any-idoc-java-mapping
Regards
Chilla..

Incorrect logical system name for datasources - entry not in TADIR

Hi all,
I currently can't replicate or edit any of my data sources because, after we applied some patches, the logical system name appears to be incorrect and a message is displayed saying the R3TR RSDS entry does not exist in table TADIR.
For example:
Object directory entry R3TR RSDS 0EMPLOYEE_0016_ATTR R3DEV does not exist.
That's correct, because all entries exist for my actual source system CD1CLNT175, not for SAP standard R3DEV.
Does anybody have any idea how I can update my source system configuration/mapping? I've looked on the forum but couldn't
find a clear cut answer.
Thanks a lot!
Markus

Hi all,
I think the solution lies in SAP note 1604726 "DataSources with package assignment cannot be activated"
1. When you access the change transaction RSDS, the system issues error message TK 753 "Object directory entry R3TR ... does not exist" twice.
2. When you try to activate the DataSource, the system issues error message TK 425 "Invalid call sequence for interfaces when recording changes".
My message is TK753.. and before that I receive TK425, I guess we have to apply SP28... time for Mario and Luigi to apply some pizzas... ehmm patches...!
I will let you know if that solved the problem, thanks for your help guys!
Markus

Logical System Name for Portal

Hi all,
I am busy documenting System Info for a newly installed Portal (EP6) including values such as SID, Sys No, etc.
I would like to know if a Portal has a Logical System Name.
As far as I know, it does not, but I would like to confirm.
Regards
Sunil

Hi,
As per the naming conventions its defined as <SID>CLNT<Client no>.
Then a system with SID = J2E and client = 000 will have a logical system name J2ECLNT000.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Bharathwaj

Stuck with logical system name for JDBC Sender system!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi All,
I'm doing a scenario as JDBC2FILE.
I tried to add my jdbc sender system to SLD. So i created the technical system
now i'm creating business system...what should i give at logical system name tab? I've created tech system and business system as third party.
do we need logical system name in this scenario where we are not interacting with any R/3???
can anyone suggest the way to achieve this scenario?
Thanks in advance.....
Santhosh.

Hi Santhosh,
I just want to add ons..few more information which it might help you.
You no need to give logical system when you are using Thirdpaty.
Please check the below blog you will get more idea how to proceed to achieve the JDBC Scenario.
/people/sap.user72/blog/2005/06/01/file-to-jdbc-adapter-using-sap-xi-30
If you have any doubts while proceeding with your scenario plesae let me know..I will try my level best.
Thanks and Regards,
Chandu

Conversion of Logical System name for "Error DTP" is not working

Hi All,
I have created a DTP and corresponding "Error DTP" for handling the Error records in development.
But when i move the both the DTP's to Consilidation systems,
DTP is getting converted to the consolidation R/3 systems (Example: TQS).
But the "Error DTP" is not getting converted with the source systems as R/3 cosolidation systems (TQS) and remains as source systems as Development R/3 system(TDS).
We are in BI 7.0 version with SP level of 13.Can anyone help how to resolve this issue? or any OSS note available to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Muruganand.K

Closing Thread.

Reg Logical System Name

Hi,
We have ECC 6.0 PROD and ECC 6.0 QAS System.
WE have different logical system names for both the systems
But when we refreshed the PROD to QAS , we have to run the BDLS transcation to change the logical System name(since we are having different logical System name)
But BDLs is taking more than 40 hours.
Please let me know , whether logical system name can be the same throughtout the landscape or not
In other words , is there any side effects if i have same logical system name for QAS and PROD

I've been researching the same issue. I found the following
"Is it necessary to change the logical system names?
Because of the two reasons mentioned above (long runtime of transaction BDLS and possible inconsistencies), it may be desirable, to avoid the renaming of logical systems during system copy.
Whether logical systems names need to be changed at all after a system copy depends on the type of the target system: "
This is from SAP System Landscape Copy for SAP Net Weaver and my SAP Solutions
Best Practice for Solution Management
I found it searching for sap bdls alternative
Hope this helps. I'm continuing my search.

Default logical system names for application and metadata in models.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for