Default Planner Group on Service Order

Can anyone tell me if it is possible to defualt the planner group on an order based on the oder type?

The effect of the previously mentioned customizing is that when you press the matchode, the system will only suggest the planner group customized.... I mind, what you need is a restriciting use of the planner group posibilities. The idea off the standar procedures is that the planner could use more than one order type (and that the order could be use for varios GP).So, i'm afraid that you'll have to use some user exit, or perhaps an autorithy object...
Hope this help
Ezequiel

Similar Messages

Default Purchasing Group in Purchase Order from user parameters of an user

Hi Team,
I have an issue in defaulting the Purchasing Group in PO.
The Purchase Order is capturing the Purchasing Group of the Contract when the PO is created with reference to a Purchase Requisition which in turn is created with reference to a contract.
The Customer says he has default Purchasing Group in his user profile - parameter tab which would always overwrite any other Purchasing Group. But now, he is getting the Purchasing Group of the contract in the Purchase Order.
Team,
Request you to post your comments/ suggestions for this.

Dear,
System is behaving in the correct manner..
If at all P GRP is maintained in contract....It will be defaulted in the PO.
If there is no P grp data in the ref doc, then system will check the default parameters maintained in the User profiles.
Regards
Utsav

Planner group authorization in order

Hi,
i am planning to give the chnage authorization of maintenance orders and notifications on the basis of planner group. The planner group is maintained in equipment master data and copied to order and notification upon creation. Now the problem i am facing is that i created one role for change order and in that i used the authorization object I_INGRP and maintain planner group values and t code: IW32. now when user is changing the order the authorization is coming in to picture but during order creation also the authorization check is there. I dont want the authorization check at order creation level but only at order change level. That why i only put t code IW32 in role. Can anyone tell me why the system is checking authorization at creation level and how to avoid this.

System will check Planner group authorisation during work order creation, See [simulation|http://www.scribd.com/doc/24194024/authorisation-issue-check].
As i understood, the planner group XXX need to change the workorder created by YYY for the equipment planner group XXX.
or Create custom auth object and enhance the code to check the restriction
-S.N

Item category group during service order replication is incorrect

Hi,
We are trying to replicate Service order from CRM to R/3 and the service product that is used in CRM service order is got from r/3 named SRV_REPAIR.
In CRM when we enter SRV_REPAIR in Service order the item category YSRP(copied from SRVP) should be determined.
when i use the item category group LEIS(service w/0 delivery) in R/3 for service product then the item category is determined as YSRP correctly but the replication of service order fails with the message
"It is not possible to upload from mixed documents with scen. A activated "
please suggest which item category group should be used in a service product for replicating a service order from CRM to r/3.
Regards
Prathiba

Hello,
The problem might be that item category is assigned to object type BUS2000140.
This object type is not relevent to upload so you get the error.
Please check FM CRM_SALESDOCUMENT_FILTER.
FM   CRM_SALESDOCUMENT_FILTER
    check for upload relevant item object types
      if ( lv_obj_type = gc_object_type_item-sales                  or
           ( lv_obj_type = gc_object_type_item-cust_contract   and
             lv_sales_contract_active = true )                      or
           ( ( lv_obj_type = gc_object_type_item-credit_req or
               lv_obj_type = gc_object_type_item-debit_req )   and
             lv_trans = true )
         and
           <ls_orderadm_i>-product_kind <> gc_product_kind-iobject
      fill table with item guids which are relevant for the upload
        insert <ls_orderadm_i>-guid into table lt_item_guids.
      else.
        insert <ls_orderadm_i>-guid into table lt_item_guids_delete. <-!
      endif.
    endloop.
endif.
if scenario A is active no mixed documents are supported
if <ls_orderadm_h>-scenario+3(1) = gc_scenario_r3chg-int_chg.
    if not lt_item_guids_delete[] is initial.                        <-
      perform fill_bapiret2
              using 'W' 'CRM_ORDER_MISC' '036'
                    lv_msgv1 lv_msgv2 lv_msgv3 lv_msgv4
                    space 0 gc_object_name-sales 0 space.
      raise upload_not_relevant.
    endif.
endif.
Please see note 772267 to prohibit data transfer in this case. The error
message is related to scenario A you are using.
Scenario A is not working for
service items as scenatio A allows changes of doc in both systems so
CRM and ECC. As service items won't be replicated this can't work at
all.
In other words, if scenario A is used the sales order in ECC has to be
identically to the sales order in CRM. This is not the case in service
processing.
So again you have to prohibit data transfer from service orders to ECC
when using scenario A.
Hopefully the information helps!
Regards, Gerhard

How to stop G/L from defaulting material group in work orders

Whenever we create a work order, the material group is pulled from the material master. But, if we have a component on a work order and don't enter in a material number, the material group defaults to electric supplies. From my research, it looks like it is doing this defaulting based upon the default G/L account assigned to components of work orders. Does anyone know how to stop this defaulting?
I might be completely off and it's not related to G/L which in that case this is not the correct forum, so if someone is knowledgeable about this let me know and I can switch the forum areas.
Thanks,

hi ,
Please check the Account Assignment In Po you have created .
for expamole if Po is created with account assignment ctegourt K than account modification is VBR
as in below Path and screen shot
Now check Material group valuation class if you are short text in PO or material master valuatiobn class if you are material Number . For expamaple its is 0001 liek ypur case . Now
Check combination in OBYC in GBB transction for VBR( Assignment category is K in PO ) and valaution class ( of Material master or material group )
Many Thanks

Planner group field in Maintenance order

Hi,
When we create a General Maintenance Order, the planner group from Equipment/Functional Location, value, will automatically appear in the Order.
But in Refurbishment Order, which is for material, the planner group field do not come automatically.
Is there any option to maintain the planner group field in the Material master, so that, this can appear automatically in the Refurbishment order.
Kindly suggest.
Raja.

Hi Kutti Raja,
The Material Master route you are looking for does not look feasible,as there is no relation between Planner Group and Material .
If your Refurbishment Order is triggered through a Notification (M4), then Planner Group automatically flows to Order.
The other alternative can be
1. Create a Z-Table having Material vs Planner Group.
2, Use the User-Exit IWO10018 to have default planner group INGPR value.
This works as I have already tested while replying to a discussion. Please go through this.work order completed by
and go through my reply having 6 steps. You need to work in the similar lines.
Take help of an ABAPer.
Jogeswara Rao K

Default settlement rule with settlement type as FUL for service orders

Hi Folks,
Could you please advise me on the below issue?
Requirement: setting up of default settlement rule with default settlement receiver as u201CCOST CENTREu201D and settlement type as u201CFULu201D for the maintenance orders (Order category u2013 30).
I was trying to configure the same in transaction KSR3_ORI to assign the strategy to the service order type by clicking u201CNew Entriesu201D system not showing the drop list for the status column which is a mandatory field.
We have applied the below notes:
Note 313454 - Info: Default value for settlement type
Note 851975 - Settlement use automatic generation creates
Could you please guide us to get the default settlement rule for service orders along with settlement type as u201CFULu201D

I was also with this problem in 2013 january and only found some information about this, here.
Our solution was change the Maximum number of distribution rules in Maintain Settlement Profiles to 1, because we wanted the FUL rule and it is always in the first line.
Now, for curiosity, I was search for another solution and found the SAP note 2028108 that explain that is not possible to change the strategy for PM/CS orders.
This note was released at 09.06.2014

Planner Group field in equipment master data

Dear All,
My client is having Maintenance dept. which is divided in to 3 sub departments like Mechanical, Electrical & Civil. By referring this I am going to create following Planner Groups.
I have decided to maintain following planner groupu2019s for planning & preparing maintenance tasks.
1) Head Mechanical
2) Head Electrical
3) Head Civil
In my case I am planning to maintain Planner Group at Equipment level. I am not going to maintain at Functional Location level.
My client is saying that they have many Equipmentu2019s for which Planner Group must be above 3 & few Equipments having Mechanical & Electrical Planner Group.
For example, Compressor is Equipment for that Mechanical & Electrical both is responsible for planning & preparing maintenance tasks. *So they wanted both Planner Groups to be maintained at Equipment level. But as per SAP standard you can maintain only one Planner Group at Equipment or Functional Location level.*
I have few questions in my mind related to Planner Group.
1) What is the importance of Planner Group?
2) If I have not maintained Planner Group at Functional Location & Equipment Level then what will happen?
3) Can I maintain Planner Group at PM Order level?
4) Suppose I have maintained Planner Group u201CHead Mechanicalu201D in Equipment but after some days there is some electrical maintenance is come up. Then I will create PM order for carrying out Electrical maintenance, in this can I able to change Planner Group from Mechanical to Electrical. But is this a correct way to change Planner Group in PM Order.
Regarding this query how I can convince to my client.
Thanks & Regards,
Sandeep

Sandeep,
I would suggest the structuring the system as follows.
          Mechanical (Work center)
                    MEng1 (Activity = Engineer name or Employee code)
                    MEng2 (Activity)
                    MEng3 (Activity)
                    MEng4 (Activity)
          Mechanical (Work center)
                    EEng1 (Activity = Engineer name or Employee code)
                    EEng2 (Activity)
                    EEng3 (Activity)
                    EEng4 (Activity)
          Civli (Work center)
                    CEng1 (Activity = Engineer name or Employee code)
                    CEng2 (Activity)
                    CEng3 (Activity)
                    CEng4 (Activity)
In a single order you can use different work center activities... ie. in a single order, you can use Elect Eng for some operations + Mech eng for some operations
Capture and seggregate the cost of each dept in the same order ie. Elect Labor cost, Mech labor cost in Cost tab
You can get the report work center wise and Activity type wise
Babu

In service order

what is logic to put purchase group in service order?
where we do setting of purchase group for service order in config?

Hello,
Do you mean purchase group or material group??
If you are not mentioned purchase group then how you can be assigned PO to Buyer or group of buyer???
Logic for material group is , if there is no material number available for service then tax conditions are mentioned on the base of material group in transaction FV11, with key combination plant and material group.
Regards
Kedar

REQUIREMENT TO POPULATE PLANNER GROUP in REPAIR SERVICE ORDER

     Hi Gurus,
   We are using Standard repair process,
These are the Following Steps
1.Service Notification Creation.
2.Sale order Creation (RAS order type)
3.Returns Delivary
4.Posts Goods Receipt
5.Repair Service Order created in the Backend.
      Requirement is , to auto-populate the PlannerGroup field in order Header data tab of Repair service Order.
I am tried with maintaining Planner group in Organisation Tab ,Responsibilites Screen ,in the Equipment Master.Planner group is not populated in the Repair Service Order header .
With Regards
Lohith

Hi Maheswaran,
Thanks for the reply,
         But i all ready tried with updating the planner group in the task list,the Repair Service order is not carrying   planner group from the Service product task list.As per the above discussions, even i tried with updating in equipment Master, still not Populating in Repair Service order.
With Regards
Lohith

Planner group is not updated in service notification using BAPI

Hi,
Planner group is not updated in service notification using BAPI BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
I have written the below code, but planner group is not updated in the service notification.
Please advice which parameters do i need to pass to update planner group in the service notification.
          wa_methods-refnumber      = '000001'.
          wa_methods-objecttype     = 'PARTNER'.
          wa_methods-method         = 'CREATE'.
          wa_methods-objectkey      = wa_subscr1-aufnr.
          APPEND wa_methods TO i_methods.
          wa_methods-refnumber      = '000002'.
          wa_methods-objecttype     = 'HEADER'.
          wa_methods-method         = 'CREATE'.
          wa_methods-objectkey      = wa_subscr1-aufnr.
          APPEND wa_methods TO i_methods.
          wa_methods-refnumber      = '000000'.
          wa_methods-objecttype     = ' '.
          wa_methods-method         = 'SAVE'.
          APPEND wa_methods TO i_methods.
          REFRESH i_partner.
          CLEAR wa_partner.
          wa_partner-orderid        = wa_subscr1-aufnr.
          wa_partner-partn_role     = 'VW'.
          wa_partner-partn_role_old = ''.
          wa_partner-partner        = wa_subscr1-parnr.
          wa_partner-partner_old    = ''.
          APPEND wa_partner TO i_partner.
          REFRESH i_planrgrp.
          CLEAR wa_planrgrp.
          wa_planrgrp-orderid        = wa_subscr1-aufnr.
          wa_planrgrp-plangroup      = wa_subscr1-ingpr.
          APPEND wa_planrgrp TO i_planrgrp.
          REFRESH i_planrgrp_up.
          CLEAR wa_planrgrp_up.
          wa_planrgrp_up-orderid     = wa_subscr1-aufnr.
          wa_planrgrp_up-plangroup   = 'X'.
          APPEND wa_planrgrp_up TO i_planrgrp_up.
*----Change order details with Technician name
          CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
            TABLES
              it_methods   = i_methods
              it_header    = i_planrgrp
            it_header_up = i_planrgrp_up
              it_partner   = i_partner
              return       = i_return.
Thanks & regards,
Krishna

Try this way
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SERVNOT_CREATE'
EXPORTING
* EXTERNAL_NUMBER =
notif_type = 'S3'
notifheader = ls_notif_h
* TASK_DETERMINATION = ' '
* SENDER =
* ORDERID =
IMPORTING
NOTIFHEADER_EXPORT = ls_notif_e
TABLES
* NOTITEM =
* NOTIFCAUS =
* NOTIFACTV =
* NOTIFTASK =
* NOTIFPARTNR =
* LONGTEXTS =
* KEY_RELATIONSHIPS =
return = lt_return
* IF lt_return IS INITIAL.                                               " <<< Comment this lie
read table lt_return into ls_return with key type = 'E'. " << Change
if sy-subrc ne 0.                                                             " << Change
COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
write: / ls_notif_e-NOTIF_NO.
ELSE.
LOOP AT lt_return INTO ls_return.
WRITE:/ 'errors'.
* ls_return.
ENDLOOP.
endif.
a®

Change the default service order type for repair order - RA

When creating a repair order (RA), a service order of type SM03 is triggered. The default order type is SM03. How can I change the order type?
Thanks in advance...

hi,
try to change in OIOL and check ..
regards
pushpa

User-exit for default values in service order

Hi,
i use EXIT QQMA0025 (EXIT_SAPLIQS0_017) to set some default values by creating
a service notification.
Is there some exit or badi to do the same for service orders. I don't want to use TPMUS.
Regards, Dieter

I create this thread in SD, because
i don't get any answers.
Regards, Dieter

MM-SRV: Adopt Material Group from Service Master instead of default in SPRO

At my current client we are encountering a problem when creating requisitions for services. When the system was originally configured years ago, a default value for material group was entered in the IMG under:
Logistics > Materials Management > External Services Management > Source Determination and Default Values > For Client
Field is "Default material group at item level" (V_T165-MATKL)
Up to now this singular default value was fine because they only had one material group for services. They are now wanting to further stratify their services spend, so there are now several additional values for Material Group that can (and are) used among their service master records. Having a single default value for Material Group is resulting in incorrect reporting of spend per Material Group.
I removed the default value in the config node stated above, but now the problem is that when creating a requisition line for services (item category D) in ME51N, no value for Material Group comes in at all, resulting in an error because Material Group is a mandatory field. Making the field optional on the Field Selection Groups is not a valid solution, as they need Material Group for spend reporting.
What we really need is for the Material Group to be automatically copied over from the service master data, in the same manner that this takes place for the material group contained in a material master.
Is this possible?
Thanks in advance,
Jason

Hi,
Hi,
1) If service master is used in the PO item, then the system will take the
material group from the service master (AC01).
2) If no service master is maintained then the system will take the
material group from the table T023. To be able to change this material group on services level - if you want a different material group on services level, you must set the field ESLL-MATKL for visible in the table control settings, and the change of the service group must be carried out manually.
Please be advised that it is the standard behaviour that the material
group on service level is not updated automatically after you have
changed the material group on purchasing level. The material group on
service level must be adjusted manually.
3) By default for service lines the system will consider the material
group which is entered at the Item level.
Services can have different material groups, therefore you can change
the material group at service level. The material group in service line
can be different and always takes higher priority from the material
group at the item level.
Regards,
Edit

Catalogs, code groups and codes not available in service order in Web UI

Hi,
I have created and maintained a subject profile for the service orders that i am using for my business scenarios. The same is visible under the objects tab in transaction data of the service order business transaction in the SAP GUI.
However the same are not visible anywhere in the Web UI (they are not available in the list of available fields as well in BSP_WD_CMPWB for BT116H_SRVO).
Can some1 pls advice me with the steps so as to make the catalogs, code groups and codes in my service orders available in the Web UI screen as well.
Will really appreciate if detailed steps are provided since I am new to Web UI technology.
Warm regards,
DP

Deepak,
I'm 99% sure (although dont quote me as I dont have a developer key so I cant finish my testing) that you're missing the context Nodes - so although you have the assignment block yuo have no link between the code set and the service order header. You havent referenced them in your comments on this post in any case.
Try this:
Go into BSP_WD_CMPWB
In the Browser component Structure open folder Component > Views
Double-click BT116H_SRVO/DetailsOV and in the structure expand to BT116H_SRVO/DetailsOV > BT116H_SRVO/DetailsOV > View Controller > DetailsOV.do > Context
Right-click on folder Context Node and click Create
Follow through the wizard defining a Z context Node (e.g. ZBTSubject) and a Model Node of BOL Entity BTSubject
Define any Dependencies etc you may wish to have and so on (most of the wizard is optional)
Repeat the same for the BOL Entity BTSubjectSet
Now go back in and see if your values are populating. I'm not a developer (and never have been), so I cant guarantee this will work as I dont have a developer key to test this, but I am quite sure that this needs to be done for you to get your values populating.
Good luck, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year (& please award points if useful!)
Andrew Griffin.

Default Planner Group on Service Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for