Default Raw material valuation type consideration for st. cost esti. of FG

Dear SAP gurus,
For Raw materials we have split valuation (DOMESTIC, IMPORT).
During standard cost estimate of finished product, system is considering always DOMESTIC valuation for raw material component. why system is behaving like this.
But we need to consider the header price(Moving average header price updated in Material master). Where we can maintain the relevant configuration settings.
Thanks and regards
Venkat V

Hi Venkat
I have never seen this.. It always takes the header price from the costing view....
Check in OMWC is you have specified DOMESTIC as the mandatory val type for external procurement
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

Defaulting batch and valuation type for a specific division for tcode me21n

Hi
I would like to default the valuation type and batch for a specific division while creating the PO.
Kindly let me know if there is any user exit for this.
Thanks & Regards
Bhagya

Hi .
Actually my requirement is while you are creating PO, the value say 'ABC' must be defaulted both in Batch and valuation type but when change that to 'DEF' it should allow you.. means you should be able to modify the batch and valuation type fields. I can be kept empty also.
I tried using field exit to default Batch and valuation type, but it does not work if the batch is empty.
If I use the BADI you mentioned what are import and export parameters and how do I code to meet my requirement.
Kindly let me know.
I will definitely reward points if it works.
Thanks in advance
Bhagya

Cost Estimate by Material Valuation Type

Hi,
Anybody knows about the impact of cost estimate (or standard cost) by material Valuation Type level instead of by Plant level? Especially how is the impact on Moving Average Price calculatio (is it calculated for both valuation type level and plant level?) and the inpact on Production order confirmation (which value will be taken for finish product inventory? Is it Plant level standard price or valuation type standard price?)
Thanks in advance

Hi,
In Split Valuation --
At plant level the material is always valued @Moving average price(MVP)
More specific to the material ,the valuation will be made @ valuation type level --either at Standard cost or MVP. as you wish.
In production order confirmation the valuation will be made @ valuation type level .
For your inventory valuation, you may go for plant level valuation or valuation type level.
Regards,
Murali
Assign points if it is useful

Report by material/valuation type

Is there a report that shows usage of a material by valuation type? Thanks in advance.
Eric

Hi,
Check Report MB51 for Material and Valuation Type combination for different Movement Types.
Note: - For this you have to add filed "BWTAR" for program RM07DOCS for table MSEG and activate selection and output indicators.
Path: - SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Reporting > Define Field Selection for Material Document List
Else check Report MB5B with "Non-Hierarchial Display" and double click on the line item to see the material movements and add Valuation Type in the layout.

Move the stock from the raw material storage type to production storage typ

Hi
How to move the stock from the raw material storage type to production storage type.
note that both stoare type be in same storage location only.
pls reply me

Hi Raj,
I WM process, issue or transfer to Production process results in picking of material from the RM storge location / storage type.
If you mean your production stoarge location is same as that of the RM stoage location, it is just a tranfer within a warehous.
which you could do with posting change document. This doesnt reduce your WM stock.
If the production stoarge location is differnt from RM stiage location, then it is picking process from WM and goods issue.
this reduces your WM stock.
hope it helps.
Regards
Harish

Material Valuation type -system chooses different valuation type

Hello
I have an issue during MIGO with 261 mvt type for a material which has two Valuation types VA1 & VA2 for plant 1000.
when i want to use MIGO with all inputs for plant 1000 with Material A & VA1, system by default chooses a different Valuation type VAL5 which is assigned to the material A in Plant 2000. i am not able to select VAL1 or VAL2 for plant 1000 material A.
automatically VAL5 reappears & can not post the doc.......what might be the issue? where to check this?
Please revert back with your valid suggestions.
Regards
Bheema

check your customizing in OMWC
click local definiitions
put the cursor onto your plant number
click local categories
you probably see there your VAL5 in column DVT Promo with a X next to it in column PrM
change the default and remove the X

BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE throws Valuation Type error for Production Ord and Mvt Type: 101

Hi,
I am trying to post a Material Document for a Production order through BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE. To the 'AFS_GOODSMVT_SKU' table of the BAPI, the sizes in the production order item are passed and to the 'GOODSMVT_ITEM' table, the respective line for each size is passed.
Lets say the production order has size 1 (with valuation type: 01 in Material) and size 2 (with valuation type 02 in Material). Inside the BAPI standard code, there is a comparison between Valuation types in Material and Production order. The Production order valuation type is taken as the first found valuation type passed to the BAPI, so in this case it is '01'. In the above case, for the first line there is no comparison error, later for the second line , when comparison happens between '01' and '02' valuation types, the error: M7043 (Valuation Type 01 differs from Valuation type of batch 02) is thrown.
However when we do the GR grom MB31, this error is not thrown.
Can someone please throw some light on how to avoid this error when posting the GR for Production Order via the BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE ?
Thanking in Advance.

I have never seen an AFS system and do not know how this works. There are a few OSS notes on AFS and error M7043, but none to this BAPI. I can't tell you whether this is a bug in SAP or in the way you use this BAPI.
I am moving this discussion to the Retail space as this is the desired place for AFS related discussions in SCN.

Valuation type missing for Purchase order

hi expert
While creating a PO for a certain material , in the item detail, delivery tab is am not getting field for valuation type.
regard
Nabil
Note : Portion of text removed , raised another thread
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on May 30, 2011 11:44 AM

Hi Nabil,
Check to see in the Material Master of the QA View. Has it been maintained? if Not, then Extend the QA View first in Material Master.
Best regards,
Amit Bakshi

Valuation type Not Exist for Material

Dear Experts
Whenever i Doing Manual posting of GR/IR through MR11 And In that case some of them Material is Showing the Error No Valuatiuon Type Exist for the Material.
No valuation type exists for material
Rgds
Pankaj Agarwal

CKMLGRIR024
Short Text
No valuation type exists for material &
Diagnosis
You are trying to post to material (). This material is subject to split valuation according to valuation type (valuation type = ). It was not possible to determine a valuation type for the posted operations.
System Response
The posting will not be accepted as a valuation type can not be found.
Procedure
Check which valuation type the GR/IR clearing account maintenance should post the balance to. The valuation type must be created before the GR/IR clearing account maintenance posting is made.
You can either:
*Post the goods receipt with reference to this order, enter the valuation type and then execute the GR/IR clearing account maintenance again.
or
Reverse the Invoice(s) that have led to this balance in the GR/IR account.*

Material master table for finding out valuation category and valuation type

Hi,
I have a material XYZ for which a valuation category 'H' is assigned. Now I need to create a valuation type for that.
Question - I want to find out for the same plant & st location which are the other materials with valuation category H, and what are the valuation types used.
I checked in mara, mard, mbew etc but of no use.
Which table can i get the data ?

hi,
As the valuation details are saved and are based on the material, you can see the details of valuation type in MBEW table...and field as BWTAR
For valuation catagory, you can see the table MARC...field as BWTTY...
If want the valuation type details for both plant and storage location, you shd check the GR table ie. MSEG where you will get the valuation type ....
hope its enough to retrieve the data..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Raw material costing - Valuation strategy with info-rec. "L" - Consignment

Hi all,
I want to implement raw material costing for all our raw material.
I created a new costing variant which use strategy "L" (price from purchasing info-record). My sub-strategy is 9 - Effective Price from PO followed by 5 - Effective price from info-record.
Everything works well except for consignment with vendor.
I have a raw that is procured from a vendor. The price for the raw is stored in the purchasing info-record and has condition types associated with it. This PIR is of CONSIGNMENT type. However, When costing the raw in CK11N the price for this consignment material is not pulled into the estimate.
I have seen in note 552486 that "For the valuation with a price from the info record, the system can basically only consider info records with category 'N' (normal) and 'L' (subcontracting). "
Have any of you come accross this situation? if yes, how did you resolve it?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
any other idea about this ? I want to use strategy "L" but want to know if I can make it work with consignment.
Thanks

MRP for FG not looking at Raw Material

HI all,
I'm running MRP for finished goods material against my production plan (created in MD61).   The material has a BOM component but when I run MRP for the FG its not looking at BOM component to consider raw material) availability and thus proposing dates solely based on the Production Plan and not any other requirements.
It simple creates the planned orders based on the production plan entered into MD61. The dates for the planned orders don't take into consideration that on the suggested Production date there is not enough raw material to actual produce the product.
The Production plan does drive requirements to purchase the raw material but the dates are not neccessarily correct to get product to the warehouse on time for production run.
FG set up:
RP Type:                                PD - MRP
Lot Size:                                 EX u2013 Lot-for-lot Order Quantity
Safety Stock:                         125 - EA
Availability Check:                   02 u2013 Individual Requirements
Procurement Type:                   E - In-House Production
In-house Production:                 1 - days
Planning Strategy:                   10 u2013 Make-to-stock production
BOM / Raw Material set up:
RP Type:                                PD - MRP
Lot Size:                                 EX u2013 Lot-for-lot Order Quantity
Availability Check:                   02 u2013 Individual Requirements
Procurement Type:                    F - External Purchased
Pland Del Time:                         3 - days
GR Process time                       1 - days
Planning Strategy:                   40 u2013 Planning with Final Assembly
How do I get the MRP for the FG to not only create the planned orders from the production plan but also take into consideration raw material availability?   Thanks for your help!!

VC,
I need to the PlndOrd date for FG to take into consideration raw material availability...otherwise it's pretty useless to the site.
I guess you are unfamiliar with the workings of standard MRP. MRP in ECC as delivered by SAP will not support this requirement.
There are a couple of assemble to order strategies that may be suitable for you, if all of your RM materials exist in the FGs BOM. Strat 81 and 82, which are intimately linked to the Sales order ATP check. These strategies are not compatible with FGs forecasts.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_06/helpdata/EN/41/19206a45fd11d188ff0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
In SAP ERP, MRP just does not check the availability of components during the MRP run. The Net Requirements calculation of a component part (which is the closest concept within MRP to an Availability check) takes place ONLY after all parent parts are completely planned, and all parent part planned orders have been already been generated and saved. In effect, when MRP is running, information is neither gathered nor considered as to what the planning situation will be for the components.
APO has several solutions that, depending upon the detailed requirements, might provide a solution. A common one is to first run an MRP type heuristic, to create planned orders for all the shortages, and subsequently run a 'Bottom-up' scheduling heuristic to bring supply and demand dates into alignment, based upon pegging information. ERP does not have this functionality.
Of course, SAP ERP is infinitely modifiable. If you have enough time and money, you can write custom code that will torture ERP into filling any Business Requirement.
Best Regards & Good Luck,
DB49

Automatic Selection of Default Valuation Type while GI

Dear SD Gurus,
Our company is having split valuation. I am having issue while doing Goods Issue. It is mandatory to enter valuation type of material before goods issue is posted.
My users wants default valuation type to come in when material is having only one valuation type. Actually users does not want to enter the valuation type all the times when material has only one valuation type so that should come as a default value.
Is there any way to achieve the same?
Thanks.
Warm regards,
Rahul Mishra

Hi,
This can be possible by maintaining data transfer routines in VOFM for deliveries.Check with your ABAPER to develop the default valuation type routine for deliveries.
Hari Challa.

Default Valuation type in REM backflush.

Hi,
In the configuration for split valuation (OMWC), for valuation category H (HALB), a batch HM has been defined as - Default: valuation type "in-house production" (DVT InhPr).
This means, for inhouse manufacture, system proposes this valuation type as default.
When, I create a production order for a material with this valuation type, system proposes valuation type HM for the given plant.
Where as, while doing REM backflushing for a material with this valuation type, system does not propose valuataion type automatically.
Why is it so?
Is there any other setting?
Is there any note for this?
Thank You,
-Madhavi.

Hi,
Apply following BADI
Goods Movements in Backflushing (Repetitive Manufacturing) BAdI RM_BFLUSH_GOODSMVT
Regards,
Sanjay

FIFO valuation at period end + consideration of valuation type

Hi,
I use FIFO valuation to valuate my raw materials at period end.
Some raw materials are split valuated, e.g. the same material number can have valuation type NEW or REP (repaired). All material movements (e.g. goods receipt) happen for each valuation type at different cost (REP is much cheaper than NEW). Also purchase orders are created at movement type level.
Unfortunately FIFO valuation does not work based on valuation type. Thus the FIFO value can be a wrong mixture of valuation type values for each material.
Example: Starting with zero quantity/value at period begin
Posting date
Movement type
Valuation type
Quantity
PO-Value/MAP
05.07.2014
101
NEW
500
500 EUR
10.07.2014
101
REP
1000
100 EUR
15.07.2014
261
REP
-500
-50 EUR
Total at period end
1000
550 EUR
The stock value of this 1000 items is 550 EUR, the 500 items NEW have a value of 500 EUR, the 500 items REP have a value of 50 EUR.
FIFO result:
The 1000 items at month end are FIFO valuated based on the last goods receipt happend on 10.07.2014 which is exactly 1000 items (not considering the different valuation types).
Thus the FIFO value is only 100 EUR although the correct value should be 550 EUR.
I didn’t find a solution in SAP standard (FIFO related table MYMP does not contain BWTAR (valuation type) whereas table MYMFT does but its always empty in my case), but is there a solution for that case, maybe I missed it in some EhP’s?
Best regards, Christian

Hi,
There is no such normal MRP run.
Whenever we take MRP run, system will consider only the main material and not the split valuation type.
THe main concept of using split valuation is only for that itself. It is there for planning irrespective of valuation type.
But if you want the system to behaive in such fashion that it should plan one part and not he other then use different material code instead of split valuation. Define these two material codes as alternative and give the usage probability as 0% and 100%. MRP will consider only that material which is having 100% usage probability.
Regards
Amit Parkhi

Default Raw material valuation type consideration for st. cost esti. of FG

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for