Default security level RV180

Quote from the RV180 manual; 'By default, all access from the insecure WAN side is blocked from accessing thesecure LAN, except in response to requests from the LAN or DMZ.'
Does this mean a general access-rule for the firewall blocking all inbound (WAN --> LAN) data is not required?
Please advice, thanks.
Ronald

Good afternoon
Hi Ronald thanks for using our forum, my name is Johnnatan and I am part of the Small business Support community. Exactly you are right!, you do not need an additional rule for this. The firewall by default blocks all inbound requests. I hope you find this answer useful,
*Please mark the question as Answered or rate it so other users can benefit from it"
Greetings,
Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.
Cisco Network Support Engineer.

Similar Messages

Changing Default Security Levels

I have several Windows 7 Enterprise machines that have already been deployed via image and need to lower the security settings for use on internal web based applications.
Is there an easy way to manipulate the configuration (a file) so that I may simply make the changes by overwriting the current configuration settings instead of, having to go to each device, opening the Java console, and changing the security settings that way?
I have attempted to login as the machine administration, make the changes on the Java console with the hopes this configuration would have migrated to all user profiles that log into the PC. Is there a "public profile" configuration file I can change and if so, what should I do.
Thank you in advance for the assistance

Create a "deployment.properties" file with the line "deployment.security.level=HIGH" (or what ever level you need that is supported by your version of Java) and save it in "C:/Windows/Sun/Java/Deployment/" (assuming windows client device).
More in depth info found below:
Deployment Configuration File and Properties

ASA 5505 Interface Security Level Question

I am wondering if someone can shed some light on this for me. I have a new ASA 5505 with a somewhat simple config. I want to set up a guest VLAN on it for a guest wireless connection.
I set up the ASA with the VLAN, made a trunk port, set up DHCP (on the ASA) on the guest VLAN, configured NAT, etc. Everything seem to be working with that. Guests are getting address on the correct subnet, etc.
The only issue I have is that the Guest VLAN (192.168.22.0) can get to the secure (VLAN1 - 172.16.0.0). I set up the guest VLAN (VLAN 5) with a security level of 10, the secure with a level of 100. I figured that would be enough. To stop the guest from accessing the secure, I had to throw on an ACL (access-list Guest-VLAN_access_in line 1 extended deny ip any 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0)
Can someone show me what I did wrong?
Thank you for any help!
To create the VLAN, I did the following:
int vlan5
nameif Guest-VLAN
security-level 10
ip address 192.168.22.1 255.255.255.0
no shutdown
int Ethernet0/1
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1 5
switchport trunk native vlan 1
switchport mode trunk
no shutdown
below is the whole config.
Result of the command: "sho run"
: Saved
ASA Version 9.1(3)
hostname ciscoasa
enable password zGs7.eQ/0VxLuSIs encrypted
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any6
xlate per-session deny tcp any6 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any6 any6
xlate per-session deny udp any4 any4 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any4 any6 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any6 any4 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any6 any6 eq domain
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
interface Ethernet0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,5
switchport trunk native vlan 1
switchport mode trunk
interface Ethernet0/3
interface Ethernet0/4
interface Ethernet0/5
interface Ethernet0/6
interface Ethernet0/7
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address <External IP/Mask>
interface Vlan5
nameif Guest-VLAN
security-level 10
ip address 192.168.22.1 255.255.255.0
boot system disk0:/asa913-k8.bin
ftp mode passive
object network obj_any
subnet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
object network Inside_Server1_80
host <Inside_server1_IP>
object network Inside_Server1_25
host <Inside_server1_IP>
object network Inside_Server1_443
host <Inside_server1_IP>
object network Inside_Server1_RDP
host <Inside_server1_IP>
object service RDP
service tcp destination eq 3389
object network Outside_Network1
host <Outside_Network_IP>
object network Outside_Network2
host <Outside_Network_IP>
object network Outside_Network2
host <Outside_Network_IP>
object network TERMINALSRV_RDP
host <Inside_server2_IP>
object network Inside_Server2_RDP
host <Inside_Server2_IP>
object-group network Outside_Network
network-object object Outside_Network1
network-object object Outside_Network2
object-group network RDP_Allowed
description Group used for hosts allowed to RDP to Inside_Server1
network-object object <Outside_Network_3>
group-object Outside_Network
object-group network SBS_Services
network-object object Inside_Server1_25
network-object object Inside_Server1_443
network-object object Inside_Server1_80
object-group service SBS_Service_Ports
service-object tcp destination eq www
service-object tcp destination eq https
service-object tcp destination eq smtp
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip any any
access-list outside_access_in extended permit object-group SBS_Service_Ports any object-group SBS_Services
access-list outside_access_in extended permit object RDP any object TERMINALSRV_RDP
access-list outside_access_in extended permit object RDP object-group RDP_Allowed object Inside_Server1_RDP
access-list outside_access_in extended permit object RDP object-group RDP_Allowed object Inside_Server2_RDP
access-list Guest-VLAN_access_in extended deny ip any 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0
access-list Guest-VLAN_access_in extended permit ip any any
pager lines 24
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
mtu Guest-VLAN 1500
no failover
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/asdm-714.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
no arp permit-nonconnected
object network obj_any
nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
object network Inside_Server1_80
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp www www
object network Inside_Server1_25
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp
object network Inside_Server1_443
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp https https
object network Inside_Server1_RDP
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 3389 3389
object network TERMINALSRV_RDP
nat (inside,outside) static <TerminalSRV_outside)IP> service tcp 3389 3389
object network Inside_Server2_RDP
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 3389 3390
nat (Guest-VLAN,outside) after-auto source dynamic obj_any interface
access-group inside_access_in in interface inside
access-group outside_access_in in interface outside
access-group Guest-VLAN_access_in in interface Guest-VLAN
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <Public_GW> 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout pat-xlate 0:00:30
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
user-identity default-domain LOCAL
aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL
http server enable
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
http 172.16.0.0 255.255.255.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec security-association pmtu-aging infinite
crypto ca trustpool policy
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
ssh key-exchange group dh-group1-sha1
console timeout 0
dhcpd auto_config outside
dhcpd address 192.168.22.50-192.168.22.100 Guest-VLAN
dhcpd dns 8.8.8.8 4.2.2.2 interface Guest-VLAN
dhcpd lease 43200 interface Guest-VLAN
dhcpd enable Guest-VLAN
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics access-list
no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept
ntp server 129.6.15.30 prefer
username <Username> VAn7VeaGHX/c7zWW encrypted privilege 15
class-map global-class
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map global-policy
class global-class
inspect icmp
inspect icmp error
inspect pptp
service-policy global-policy global
prompt hostname context
no call-home reporting anonymous
Cryptochecksum:7f5d70668ebeb94f49f312612f76c943
: end

Hi,
To my understanding they should not be able to connect to the more secure network IF you DONT have an interface ACL configured.
One very important thing to notice and which I think is the most likely reason this happened is the fact that as soon as you attach an interface ACL to an interface then the "security-level" looses its meaning. The "security-level" has meaning as long as the interface is without an ACL. This makes the "security-level" only usable in very simple setups.
What I think happend is that you have "permit ip any any" ACL on the interface that allowed all the traffic.
Your option is to either remove the interface ACL completely or have the ACL configured like you have now. I mean first block traffic to your secure LAN and then allow all other traffic which would allow the traffic to Internet
Hope this helps
Please do remember to mark a reply as the correct answer if it answered your question.
Feel free to ask more if needed.
- Jouni

Assist , how do i allow hosts in inside segment to reach out segment and vice versa taking into account the security levels

ASA Version 7.0(8)
hostname BUJ-IT-ASA-LAN-2
domain-name leo.bi
enable password MgKXXPviZgW4zhKc encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
dns-guard
interface Ethernet0/0
description connects ucom lan
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.0.13 255.255.248.0
interface Ethernet0/1
description out interface
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address 192.168.254.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/2
shutdown
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Ethernet0/3
shutdown
no nameif
no security-level
no ip address
interface Management0/0
shutdown
nameif management
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
management-only
ftp mode passive
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
pager lines 24
logging asdm informational
mtu management 1500
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
no failover
asdm image disk0:/asdm-508.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00
timeout mgcp-pat 0:05:00 sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00
timeout uauth 0:05:00 absolute
username UcomIT password Tx95VR7l4gIiavnh encrypted
aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL
http server enable
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 management
http 192.168.0.0 255.255.248.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
telnet timeout 5
ssh 192.168.0.0 255.255.248.0 inside
ssh timeout 5
ssh version 2
console timeout 0
dhcpd address 192.168.1.2-192.168.1.254 management
dhcpd lease 3600
dhcpd ping_timeout 50
dhcpd enable management
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect dns maximum-length 512
inspect ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect h323 ras
inspect rsh
inspect rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect sip
inspect netbios
inspect tftp
inspect icmp
service-policy global_policy global
Cryptochecksum:ba068a6f85d256ce9351d903c60873e5
: end

Hi,
Its success really depends on the rest of the network that I dont know about.
If you hosts that you are using to PING/ICMP through the ASA are connected to the same network as the ASAs interface then you will have to make sure that the hosts both have routes towards the other network.
Also if on the "outside" of the ASA there are additional networking devices then you have to configure default route on the ASA also as mentioned in the other discussion.
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
The above replys ACL was just an example of the configuration format. If you wanted to allow ICMP then you would also have to allow ICMP
access-list OUTSIDE-IN permit icmp 192.168.254.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.248.0 echo
I dont see anything else wrong with the ASA configuration related to ICMP other than possibly the lacking of default route and allowing the ICMP from the "outside" with the ACL "OUTSIDE-IN".
Go through the network setup from one host to the other. On each step confirm that that device has route towards both of the networks. Otherwise the devices will naturally not be able to forward the ICMP messages from end to end.
- Jouni

Default Privilege Level for ASA users authenticated by Radius or TACACS when using ASDM

Hello,
I'm trying to figure out what the default privilege level is for users that are authenticated to the ASA via a remote authentication server when using the ASDM.
the command "aaa authentication http console TACACS+ LOCAL" is used in the ASA config.
The remote server is NOT setting any privilege levels for users. There are also no aaa authorization commands present in the config.
So what privilege level do the users receive when they login with the ASDM? I'm being told that the users receive admin access which includes config write, reboot, and debug. But I cannot find any documentation stating hte default level.
Please advise. And providing links to cisco documentation would be great too.
Thanks,
Brendan

Hi Berendan,
Hope the below exerpt from document clarifies your query. also i have provided the link to refer.
About Authorization
Authorization controls access per user after users authenticate. You can configure the security appliance to authorize the following items:
•Management commands
•Network access
•VPN access
Authorization controls the services and commands available to each authenticated user. Were you not to enable authorization, authentication alone would provide the same access to services for all authenticated users.
If you need the control that authorization provides, you can configure a broad authentication rule, and then have a detailed authorization configuration. For example, you authenticate inside users who attempt to access any server on the outside network and then limit the outside servers that a particular user can access using authorization.
The security appliance caches the first 16 authorization requests per user, so if the user accesses the same services during the current authentication session, the security appliance does not resend the request to the authorization server.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/asa/asa80/asdm60/user/guide/usrguide/aaasetup.html
Regards
Karthik

Ms word95 to pdf - "security level too high"?

I'm a brand new user of Acrobat 9.0 (on XP system) - all kinds of problems (including major file crash and loss during 9.0 installation - more on that later). for now, I need to get started immediately on converting some MS Word doc files to pdfs - What I get from 9.0 is the message that "The Security Level is Too High". If it's referring to the MS word docs, they are unprotected (I've checked and tried several - Word shows they are not protected, and as far as I know, never have been). They were originally created on a mac with macWord - but were not protected and converted to windows with MacDrive7. They show in MS Word in good condition and unprotected. What do I need to do to get them into acrobat and into pdf format? I've also check the knowledge base here and elswhere without any clues except one chap who seemed to be having similar problems (along with serious crashes) using 8.1. Other than that, I'm mistified.
I've also tried using the context menu 'covert to pdf' method and also creating a new pdf (blank) and inserting them. In both cases the security message aborted the process. Need to do this right away. I'm not technically skilled, so if someone can give me some clear instructions I'd be grateful. - red

Thank you all for responding so quickly. First, I'll mention the serious message and a warning. DO NOT INSTALL ACROBAT 9.0 IN AN ENVIRONMENT WITH WORD 7.0 (or any old(er) MS Word version before 2k). The consequences are ghastly, including the deletion of half or more of your program files (including your email clients, av software and other primary programs), the corruption of your browser, registry (including restore points) and other not so nice events - worse than most bad viruses. That's a problem Adobe and I will probably be taking a look at next week. Mean time, they indicate that they are going to add the matter to their KB and elswhere so that users have a heads-up on the issue.
As for the conversion problem from Word 7.0 .doc to .pdf - Bill, you just about nailed it. It was, indeed, a problem that could be circumvented by going to the printer dialog and setting the printer to 'Adobe pdf file' (something a novice wouldn't think of, nor line tech-support for that matter.). As far as Word/pdf 'printer' is concerned you're just printing the file. However, as I understand things, that's how Adobe attaches the Word documents - It does it through the printer interface. Once that setting is changed to 'Adobe pdf printer' the file is simply picked from the print queue (or before) and loaded into A9. Save it from A9, and the job is done. So, Bill, If Adobe hadn't found the answer, I do believe you would have been telling me exactly how to do it after a few more posts. The credit, though, goes to Neo Johnson, tech-support supervisor in New Delhi. The last two days (almost 9 hours of phone time) were spent with various tech-support agents at Adobe; but, he was the one who finely thought about the interaction between A9 and Word and figured it out.
Ok -that's the brief. The rest is a little history/background for whomever is interested (skip, otherwise - not important). The problem begins with failure to install - first, setup can't find the msi file - it was there, and I browsed it, so that was solved. Then 'invalid licensing - process stopped' messages appear. That was a little tougher and http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/405/kb405970.html and some other articles had me doing repair, reinstall, and other complex (for me) procedures. One of the problems was that flexnet had failed to install, which was a stumper for me (I couldn't find it to download separately - barely knew what it was/did - and finally understood that Adobe was supposed to install it. After that, I did several uninstalls, to no effect. Finally I did a few moderate and then deep uninstalls (with Revo) and several reinstalls. Things got progressively worse. On one reboot, my desktop came up and all the program icons were broken links. I examined targets and such and then went to my 'program files' directory. To my horror, nearly all my primary program (including thunderbird email client, AVG etc.) files had disappeared. The folders were simply empty. Firefox still loaded, but the tabs were non functional. Several checks and some light disc analysis indicated the files vanished. No trace. However, my document folders and data were intact (also backed-up). I went to restore and found that all the old restore points (including the one's Revo sets before uninstalling) were gone. If it had been a virus, it couldn't have done a better job at making a mess of things. At that point, I knew the registry had been toasted and I was facing a complete OS reinstall. Instead, I opted for reinstalling some of the critical programs (and because the document files appeared to be intact). After the first few - thunderbird, firefox etc. - I was relieve to find that they were picking up on the old settings and restoring themselves to their previous states. I still have a number of these to do - and a few must be re-configured. But that's going ok.
Then the saga of Adobe, several phone calls; several times the phone connection was cut off and I had to call again and start over from the beginning with a new person. The matter always had to be esculated to the next tier - more time, more cues, no solutions. They went over the firefox settings, the adobe settings. They were puzzled about the broken links. Attempts to open doc files (after a fresh install of winword) were resulting in 'invalid win32 application'. All kinds of problems made progress difficult. We cleared up the 'invalid....' messages by reparing the file associations (in XP folder options) and then opening the docs in Word and resaving them as something else. It was a labor. Finally, there was simply no answer except, like the post here, Word 7 is simply too old and uses different scripting. The only solution was to either buy (ugh, ouch!) Word 2007 (and hope that it would load them and save them in A9 useable form) or, try installing Word2k (which I have) and processing them through that; and, then using Acrobat 8.x to load those and save the pdfs for A9 to use. However, when Adobe said they could not provide me with a free (even trial) version of 8.x to do the job - licensing problems etc. -- It seemed like a really ugly solution. Finally, I'm begging Adobe to give me a free copy of 8.x and in steps Neo. He can't provide the free copy, but he asks a few questions himself. We go to Adobe and reset some of the security settings (something other agents didn't know or think of). No dice - still can't load the docs. But then he says, Open up Word. Ok. load the file and then hit 'print' - ok, the print dialog comes up. 'Now,' he says, 'open the properties and see what printers are listed.' Ok I do that, and I'll be... 'Adobe pdf printer' is among them. "Just what I thought," he said, Adobe was hooking up with word, but didn't have its printer to attach." So we set 'Adobe pdf' as the printer and lo and behold, the docs loaded into Adobe as pdfs. End of that story. (so bill, you had it too - wish you had answered the phone in the first place!)
Clean up. So, there's a few simple solutions, I think (though i'm no techie and you folks will certainly have better ideas). First, I don't buy the story that early versions of Word are either 1) unsupported by MS or, 2) nobody uses them, as valid reasons why not to fix the problem of the "unloadable" docs. I figure there are at least a couple of aproaches and easy patches that will correct the matter. One is from the Word side - to is to set the current printer setting to use 'Adobe printer', get the file and then reset the printer back to what it was - default. The other is to patch A9 to detect legacy source applications and bypass things that would normally make the file unloadable, unless, of course, they were actually protected or, read only files. In that case, Adobe could simply inform the user to 'unprotect' them, the same as it now does with its 'Security Setting too High' message for later versions. I'm sure there are even better ways. But, that would fix things as far as file loading and conversion.
As to the installation and crash problems - those need to be addressed. Even if its only a few dozen people that might have the same problem, it needs 1) to be given as a noticable warning and keyword in Adobe documents (which now simply indicate that it can process .doc files); 2) it needs to be examined to insure systems that have Word 7.x or older can install without problem, and certainly without harming their system. Adobe has a good reputation and does a good job. That's worth protecting with all customers, even if Marketing can't quite see why and the bean counters can't find much profit in the task. It's what I expect from professionals and to do less certainly subtracts from Adobe's standing. That should be worth a great deal, I would imagine.
Anyway, thanks folks - got to get some sleept, and then get those pdfs done and sent to people who are waiting for them. - best to you all, red.

Security Level on Navigation (6.0 sp9)

I use a custom iview launch from the UWL. The custom iview comes up based off of the navigation from the default uwl screen. I am trying to code the cancel action of the custom iview.
I put a link on the page that has a reference back to the pcd location of the default page.
The portal is now complaining with the following error:
Access denied (Object(s): com.sap.portal.system/security/sap.com/NetWeaver.Portal/high_safety/com.sap.portal.runtime.system.console/components/default).
I tried to overide this by setting the security level in the portalapp.xml file to low_security.
    <component name="ApproveReject">
      <component-config>
        <property name="ClassName" value="ApproveReject"/>
        <property name="ComponentType" value="jspnative"/>
        <property name="JSP" value="pagelet/ApproveRejectJSP.jsp"/>
        <property name="SafetyLevel" value="low_safety"/>
      </component-config>
      <component-profile>
        <property name="tagLib" value="/SERVICE/htmlb/taglib/htmlb.tld"/>
      </component-profile>
    </component>
htmlb link code:
          <hbj:link
                   id="backLink"
                   text="Main Menu"
                   target="_self"
                   tooltip="Click to return to Main Menu"
                 reference="pcd!3aportal_content!/portal_content/com.nexeninc.NEXEN/fld_tots/com.sap.netweaver.bc.uwl.uwl_page">
          </hbj:link>

i had applied the patch from note 796540. however, it dint seem to help (

No traffic from Outside1 (Security level 100) attached Networks to DMZ and Viceversa

I have an ASA5510, i configured an Outside, 1 DMZ and 2 interfaces 100 security level (Outside1 and Inside). I can ping and have fluid traffic between DMZ and Inside interface, but don't have any kind of traffic between DMZ and the Outside1. I wrote the same configuration for both 100 Security Level interfaces. Also I have connected a Cisco 892 router to Outside1. When i have attached a computer instead of 892, traffic between Outside1 and DMZ is fluid. i need to have fluid traffic between networks connected to 892
Someone can help me? Here are the 2 configs:
ASA5510:
: Saved
ASA Version 8.2(1)
hostname ASAFCHFW
domain-name a.b.c
enable password 6Jfo5anznhoG00fM encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif Outside
security-level 0
ip address x.y.z.162 255.255.255.248
interface Ethernet0/1
nameif Outside1
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/2
nameif DMZ
security-level 10
ip address 172.16.31.1 255.255.255.0
interface Ethernet0/3
nameif Inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
interface Management0/0
nameif management
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
management-only
boot system disk0:/asa821-k8.bin
ftp mode passive
dns server-group DefaultDNS
domain-name farmaciachavez.com.bo
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
access-list dmz_in extended permit tcp host 172.16.31.2 any eq domain
access-list dmz_in extended permit tcp host 172.16.31.2 any eq smtp
access-list dmz_in extended permit tcp host 172.16.31.2 any eq www
access-list dmz_in extended permit tcp host 172.16.31.2 any eq https
access-list dmz_in extended permit tcp host 172.16.31.2 any eq 3000
access-list dmz_in extended permit tcp host 172.16.31.2 any eq 1000
access-list Inside extended permit ip any any
access-list Inside extended permit icmp any any
access-list 100 extended permit tcp any host x.y.z.163 eq smtp
access-list 100 extended permit udp any host x.y.z.163 eq domain
access-list 100 extended permit tcp any host x.y.z.163 eq https
access-list 100 extended permit tcp any host x.y.z.163 eq www
access-list 100 extended permit tcp any host x.y.z.163 eq 3000
access-list 100 extended permit tcp any host x.y.z.163 eq 1000
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging buffered debugging
logging asdm informational
mtu Outside 1500
mtu Outside1 1500
mtu DMZ 1500
mtu Inside 1500
mtu management 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
icmp permit host 192.168.0.22 Outside
icmp permit 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 Outside1
icmp permit 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 Outside1
icmp permit 172.16.31.0 255.255.255.0 Outside1
icmp permit 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 DMZ
icmp permit 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 Inside
icmp permit 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 Inside
icmp permit 172.16.31.0 255.255.255.0 Inside
asdm image disk0:/asdm-647.bin
asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
global (Outside) 101 interface
nat (Outside1) 101 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
nat (DMZ) 101 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
nat (Inside) 101 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
static (DMZ,Outside) x.y.z.163 172.16.31.0 netmask 255.255.255.255
static (DMZ,Inside) 172.16.31.0 172.16.31.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Outside1,Inside) 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Inside,DMZ) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Inside,Outside1) 192.168.0.0 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Outside1,Inside) 172.1.1.0 172.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (DMZ,Outside1) 172.16.31.0 172.16.31.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Outside1,DMZ) 192.168.2.0 192.168.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Outside1,Inside) 172.1.2.0 172.1.2.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Outside1,Inside) 172.1.3.0 172.1.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Outside1,Inside) 192.168.3.0 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
static (Outside1,DMZ) 172.1.1.0 172.1.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
access-group dmz_in in interface DMZ
route Outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 x.y.z.161 20
route Outside1 172.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2 1
route Outside1 172.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2 1
route Outside1 172.1.3.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.2 1
route Outside1 192.1.0.0 255.255.192.0 192.168.2.2 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
http server enable
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 management
http 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 Inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
telnet 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 Inside
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0
dhcpd address 192.168.1.2-192.168.1.254 management
dhcpd enable management
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics access-list
no threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept
webvpn
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect dns preset_dns_map
inspect ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect h323 ras
inspect rsh
inspect rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect sip
inspect netbios
inspect tftp
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context
Cryptochecksum:7441424d1fcf87c3eb837b569e84aa9e
: end
Cisco 892:
Current configuration : 3296 bytes
! Last configuration change at 01:15:13 UTC Tue Apr 29 2014 by eguerra
version 15.2
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname RouterHQFCH
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable secret 4
no aaa new-model
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1580540949
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1580540949
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1580540949
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1580540949
certificate self-signed 01
3082022B 30820194 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 05050030
31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 31353830 35343039 3439301E 170D3134 30343134 31393433
30315A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 35383035
34303934 3930819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281
8100BC61 7D5F7F47 65203EC9 1207B83F 19EC7AC3 00404F99 A89FD64B 1F0F659F
E99062C2 3BB1E517 075BAF59 D361FFC9 4F872A14 A7528061 CF936F40 D03F234B
5641147F D2B4AB7D 9E10F36A 087F511B F68ABC6E 98F96C74 8EF5084B F490D91B
0EC05671 D8C5B7DD EE8F48C2 CD76F7C9 B8405DD6 42375B3C 8D04FDEF 555D0FA0
0FDF0203 010001A3 53305130 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603
551D2304 18301680 14FCB587 54EE2C1B 2B6DB648 A6FC0ECF 85062C8F 6A301D06
03551D0E 04160414 FCB58754 EE2C1B2B 6DB648A6 FC0ECF85 062C8F6A 300D0609
2A864886 F70D0101 05050003 81810033 A196E361 A273E890 146EF605 D7AB9235
52BA28F8 A526D8AE CD903257 E4E81C76 C85FBCD4 201DFF90 11FB1617 9210037E
B66299B3 FB2173D2 AFEC9B52 D2221BEA 9B8CC180 BE36F3AB D5811F9F 401043B0
4BDA8647 897D8FE7 6D753C4F 3C76A493 2C260C22 24E966EB BEE54A2A 51D58F21
23080B9D 9C5FD690 62C6B0C9 30C3AA
quit
license udi pid C892FSP-K9 sn FTX180484TB
username servicios privilege 15 password 7
username eguerra privilege 15 password 7
interface GigabitEthernet0
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet1
switchport access vlan 2
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet2
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet3
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet4
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet5
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet6
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet7
no ip address
interface GigabitEthernet8
ip address 172.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet9
ip address 172.1.2.1 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Vlan1
ip address 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
ip address 192.168.100.200 255.255.255.0
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip route 172.16.31.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1
ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.1
control-plane
line con 0
password 7
login
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password 7
login local
transport input all
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end
Thanks in advance

Maybe I did not understand what you are trying to accomplish. What I mentioned was to make your ACL configuration better, meaning more secure. Changing the security level just helps understand that you are not coming from a site that does not require ACLs, thus from lower to higher security interfaces you need to place ACLs, then there is a hole other world regarding NAT/PAT that involve same security interfaces that sometimes confuse customers so I also wanted to avoid that for you.
To enforce security between interfaces you need to know what protocols and ports are being used by servers that reside behind the higher security interface so you only open what is needed then block the rest to that higher security interface.

Cisco ASA Security Levels

Hi All
I have just started working on Cisco ASAs and working on following scenario:
3 Depts having 3 separate Networks given following names
Finance
Accounts
HR
Communication Between them should be restricted and allowed on specfic host and services. My approach is that I have assigned security level of "0"
to each of them and also enabled "same-security-traffic permit inter-interface", so that they can communicate with each other. Now what I have observed is that as soon as I enable same-security-traffic permit inter-interface traffic starts flowing among them without the need for any access-list. But as soon as I create an access list for some specific host , traffic stops flowing for all other hosts except for the one which was granted access in access-list.
Is my approach right? Please do advise, and also Is this a default behaviour of ASA to implicitly deny traffic for all host as soon as I place a acl after enabling same-security-traffic permit inter-interface.
Thanks and Regards

Hello,
If all of the networks zone have the same security level for your company then you can use the same one on them.
Remember that all the ACL's have an implicit deny at the bottom, so the behavior is expected.
Same security level interfaces with the same-security-traffic command will be allow to exchange traffic without the need on an ACL but as soon as you place one on any of those interfaces you will need to specify the traffic you will need to allow.
Regards,
Rate all the helpful pots
Julio
Security Engineer

I'm getting an error "Security level is set to High..."

When I’m trying to combine multiple Word documents into a single PDF I’m getting an error "Security level is set to High...".
I regularly did this at my previous office, and the process involved dragging the Word doc’s from an Explorer window into an Adobe Acrobat window, then selecting ‘combine’; Acrobat would automatically open Word for each file, print it to the file it was building, then close Word and move on to the next file.
It appears that some setting on my new laptop is now different, either for Word or for Acrobat, but as usual, the error message is next to useless to fix the problem. There is no error message opening in Word, as the dialogue box suggests, and I can’t find any “Security Warning” dialogue box in Word. Where is the setting I need to fix?.
I am using Windows 7 with Word 2013 and Acrobat XI Pro.
-Michael

Hey Michael,
You might need to check the security level within Internet Explorer and ensure that both Download Signed ActiveX Controls and Run ActiveX Controls And Plug-ins are set to Prompt.
For this:
Open Internet Explorer. Go to Tools> Internet Options and click the Security tab.
Click Default Level, or click Custom Level and do the following:
a. Find the section ActiveX Controls And Plug-ins.
b. Set Download Signed ActiveX Controls to Prompt.
c. Set Run ActiveX Controls And Plug-ins to Prompt
Now check again and let me know if it works fine now.
Regards,
Anubha

4 security level with 2 FWSM contexts

Hello,
I have to implement a DC with two 6509, ACE and FWMS with only a default license for 2 VFW.
But the problem I have, is that I have 4 separate networks where I like to give a different security level.
I'm using the FWSM in transparent mode.
Any idea ? about using VRF ? ACE or something else ?
Suggestions will be appreciated.
Regards,
Omar

Hello Omar,
Although I'm not familiar with the ACE blade we do run 2 X 6509s with FWSMs.
In your case you could connect your 4 networks to a single context (VFW) since the max network connections per context is 8. You would create 4 BVIs (Bridge Virtual Interfaces.) Security levels in FWSMs don't have much meaning since you are required to specifically allow traffic to pass through the context regardless of which side of the BVI it comes from. By default no traffic flows at all. All traffic is filtered with ACLs.
You could also create a VRF on the 6509 that could act as a central or core routing point for your networks. (We do this for 18 separate contexts and call it the fusion VRF.) However you would only use a VRF if you wanted to keep the routing table isolated from the global table running on the 6509's.
Otherwise this is unnecessary.
If you chose to run the FWSMs in multiple context mode you could have two networks per context, still connect them to a fusion VRF, and also run an Active/Active FWSM configuration which allows you to do a type of load sharing along with failover. One context is active and one context is standby on FWSM A and on FWSM B the roles reverse. This shares active traffic across the FWSM blades.
Hope this brief description is helpful for you.
Simon

Workflow 2013 use app model for higher security levels

In a workflow 2013, I am currently calling a workflow 2010 so that I can use the impersonate step to run steps at a higher security level than the user that submitted the workflow. In the impersonate step, everything that needs to be run at a higher security
level are placed in the impersonate step.
I have found that the app model in workflow 2013 looks like it replaces the impersonate step in workflow 2010, correct?
Due to that fact if I want to use the app model in workflow 2013 instead of using the impersonate step in workflow 2010, will I need to place all actions and conditionals within in the app model step for everything that needs to be executed at a higher security
level? If so, can you show me how to accomplish this goal?
If this is not true, what actions and steps do I need to place within the app model so that those actions and conditionals occur at a higher security level?

Hi wendy,
What is app model in SharePoint 2013 workflow? Based on your description, it seems like “App Step”. Is it right?
“App Step” provides all the workflow actions added to it, with Read from and Write to Permissions to all the Items in the Site.
App Step is not available by default you need to activate Workflows can use app permissions feature in your Site to get this displayed for that site in SharePoint Designer.
You need to place all actions and conditionals within the App Step for everything that needs to be executed at a higher security level.
More information about App Step in SharePoint 2013 Designer, please refer to the links below:
Create a workflow with elevated permissions by using the SharePoint 2013 Workflow platform
A word about App Step in SharePoint 2013 Workflow Platform
SharePoint Designer 2013 – The new “App Step”
Best Regards,
Wendy
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

The security level is set to High

Windows 2008R2 terminal Server
Office 2013
Adobe Acrobat XI update 9
When trying to create a PDF from a word document (have not tried other files yet), Adobe hangs for about 2 mins and then gives the following message
The Security Level is set to High
Please run the application which created this document, in the "Security Warning" dialog select the check box "Always trust macros from this source" and enable macro's created by Adobe Systems inc
No 1. There is absolutely no need for an apostrophe in the second instance of the word macros
Have deployed the Adobe Acrobat Administrative template and enabled the following setting
'Automatically Trust Sites for Win OS Security Zones' (Elevates the trusted sites list in Internet Explorer to privileged locations so that they may bypass enhanced security restrictions. When enabled, the trust list is a union of IE's trust list and Acrobat's privileged locations list. GUI mapping: Edit > Preferences > Security (Enhanced) > Automatically trust sites for my Win OS security zones)
- not a fix
Have exported every digital signature from the pdf office dlls and imported to the computer certificate store - not a fix
Have disabled every office macro and security setting - not a fix
Does not matter if the file being converted is on a UNC path, mapped drive, or local drive
Have added all file locations containing office docs to trusted folders in Word and Adobe - not a fix
R-Click context menus for combining and conversion work fine however I understand that this uses the Adobe PDF Printer and not the office addons
Opening a file in Word and converting to a PDF using the Addon is fine as is printing to the PDF Printer
This issue only occurs from within the Adobe Acrobat Application 'Create file from PDF' and currently only seems to affect Office documents
I cannot see how to give Adobe any more trust

Solved
I was running Office in a 'RunVirtual' environment. This man explains it best
http://ppe.blogs.technet.com/b/gladiatormsft/archive/2014/02/05/app-v-5-on-run-virtual-rds -run-virtual-virtualizable-ext…
Essentially Office and Acrobat are installed Natively however all Office Apps are configured to run in a Virtual environment so that Office Addins which are true AppV applications can be linked into Office.
My 'Empty' 'RunVirtual Office package did not have 'Com Integration' enabled
Adobe Acrobat makes use of a Com Addin for Office, so Office was unable to expose that to Adobe Acrobat until the 'Empty' 'RunVirtual Office package was updated accordingly

Im looking for a replacement of "Default Zoom Level" addon.

Im looking for a replacement of "Default Zoom Level" addon. Why is this disabled in Firefox 5/6? Is there a similar addon or how can I set the default zoom?

Did you do a compatibility check?
That is required in cases where the extension has a maxVersion (in this case 4.0.*) set in the XPI file and the server has the correct compatibility data ([[https://versioncheck.addons.mozilla.org/update/VersionCheck.php?reqVersion=2&id={D9A7CBEC-DE1A-444f-A092-844461596C4D}&version=4.5&maxAppVersion=6.0&status=userEnabled&appID={ec8030f7-c20a-464f-9b0e-13a3a9e97384}&appVersion=5.0&appOS=Windows&appABI=x86-msvc&locale=en-US&currentAppVersion=5.0&updateType=97 8.*]]).
From https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/default-fullzoom-level/<br />
Works with: Firefox 3.6 - 8.*

ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level

We recently updated our development environment to Visual Studio 2010. We have previously deployed (with success) .Net stored procedures from Visual Studio 2005 to our Oracle 10gR2 database. I am currently trying to configure a local instance (called local) of Oracle 10gR2 database to test deployment of .Net stored procedures to Oracle 10gR2 via Visual studio 2010 and ODT version 11.2.0.1.2. I have built the demo from the ode developer guide and gotten as far as deploying it but executing the stored procedures from VS 2010 or SQL*Plus produces the following error...
ORA-20100: AppDomain could not be created for the specified security level
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_CLR", line 152
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.GETDEPTNO", line 7
Here is what I have done.
(Server)
1. Installed oracle 10gR2 with ODE.Net
2. Installed Oracle 10gR2 patch set 22
3. Installed ODE upgrade from Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21
(Client)
4. Installed Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio .NET with Oracle 10g Release 2 ODAC 10.2.0.2.21 (In new client home).
5. Installed patch set 22 on 10g client home.
6. Installed Oracle 11g Release 2 ODAC 11.2.0.1.2 with Oracle Developer Tools for Visual Studio(in new 11g client home, only for VS 2010)
I have made some minor changes (GAC) etc. per the following threads...
ODE.NET 11.1.0.7.20 on 10g Database?!
Re: Error: System.TypeInitializationException
The database appears to be fully functional via TOAD - SQL plus etc. I can't find much on this error but it appears Oracle needs some permissions to launch an ASP.Net application that it does not have. Any help would be GREATLY appreciated, don't hesitate to ask for additional details.

The KB article is almost what we have apart from theitalic underlined
part
Consider the following scenario:
You use a domain administrator account to log on to a computer that is running Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
You use the Active Directory Users and Computers Microsoft Management Console (MMC) snap-in to connect to a domain controller.
You open the Properties dialog box of a user account.
The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
You set the Remote Desktop Services Home Folderattribute to the shared folder path.
NoteThis attribute is located on the
Remote Desktop Services Profiletab.
You click Apply or OK.
In this scenario, you receive the following error message:
The home folder could not be created because: The network name cannot be found.
Note If you click Apply or OK again, no error message is returned. However, the setting is not saved.
I think the important bit is
The user account has sole access to a shared folder path that cannot be accessed by the administrator account.
We manually create the shares on our NAS and then just want to enter the path in the profile tab, I suppose the question is how to we stop it trying to create the shares ?

Default security level RV180

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for