Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule
Hello,
I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L. However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?
you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data.
Similar Messages
-
Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error
Workflow Work order SETTLEMENT RULE Error, but settlement is done no problem in updation. But notification error there.
Notification of completion cannot be generated
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Error handling for work item 000112476185
Work item 000112476185: Object 000020154849 method UPDATESETTLEMENTRULE cannot be executed
Call transaction was canceled.
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
No errors occurred -> Details in long text
Please advice what could be the reason this error.
Best Regards,
PrabhakarMessage no. WL821
Message no. FD009
Message no. WL863
Problems occurred when generating a mail
Message no. SWF_RUN534
Error handling for work item 000133673828
Message no. SWF_RUN630
Error '9' when calling service 'SO_OBJECT_SEND'
Message no. SWF_RUN535
Thanks,
Prabhakar -
Work Order Settlement Rule Determination
Hi Experts,
For T-code : IW32, can any one suggest any enhancements which triggers during following conditions:
1)While Releasing the Work order.
2)To redetemine settlement Rule i.e. I need to over wrtie a filed in Settlement rule i.e. "Setllement Reciever" with Cost center value.
3) Overwrite the default costcenter value in Location Tab with custom field value.
Thanks in advance,
With regards.Hi Vani.
You must use either EXIT_SAPLCOIH_009 user exit or must configure workflow (STD object ISUSMORDER) .
Thanx
suresh. -
KO8G open work order settlement
Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Pradeep
Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AMHey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep -
Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88
Hi,
I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
Has anyone come across such a situation?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
PradeepAshok,
Thanks for the reply.
We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
Thanks
Pradeep -
Where can I define Account assignment category for order settlement rules
Dear Gurus,
When I used Tcode: CO07 to create a rework order for parent order. But I cann't find the Account assignment category = Ord (Order) in the maintain Settlement rule overview.
Where can I define Account assignment category for order settlement rules?
Please help me. Thanks!
Regards
Paul.I've resolved this question.
Firstly, run OPJH - Define Order Types, we should assign settlement profile for the order type.
Secondly, Run OKO7-Maintain Settlement Profile, find and mailtain the settlement profile. In 'Valid Receivers' we should set the field 'Order' = 1-(Settlement Optional).
Thirdly, run CO07 - Create Order without material. We can find account assignment catetory 'ORD' in maintaining Settlement rule.
Edited by: Paul Chan on Feb 16, 2009 5:15 AM -
Reverse work order settlements
Experts,
I need to reverse all the work order settlements that were done in a month due to some error - Appreciate it if someone can let me know how to take care of this.
All answers/inputs/thoughts will be duly appreciated and rewarded with points.
Thanks,
NanditaKO8G
-
Maintain internal order settlement rule using LSMW
HI ALL
I want to do mass maintenance of internal order settlement rule. Settlement category is PSG.
But when I use LSMW to do KO02, I only can input one settlement receriver, the first line will be overwritten by the second line.
I also see BAPI INTERNAL_ORDER_CREATE,but cannot find PSG as a settlement category.
Does anyone know how to do this?
THX
DeeliaHi Lian
When you do recording, enter two settlement rules..
Then, before pressing the "DEFAULT ALL" button, change the Field names for the 2nd settlement rule
The problem you described happens because the field names for both settlement rules are same.. Hence, it gets overwritten
Assume that field name for Order is AUFNR... You can change the field name in recording to ZAUFNR for one of the fields
See the screen shot, wherein I changed the name of the recorded field to _01, _15 and _70
Br. Ajay M -
For internal order settlement rule amount column is requied instead %
Hi Gurus,
For internal order settlement rule percentage is there but business wants to settle from AUC to final asset by amount wise how can we do this.
I tried to change the investment profile but it is coming amount field while saving it is not displaying.
Please help in this regard
Thank you.
RanganadhHi
Check the path
IMG>Controlling>Internal Orders>Actual Posting>Settlement>Maintain Settlement Profile>Maintain Settlement Profile.
Here there is a tick for amount settlement under Indicators. You need to maintain this check box for your requirements.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari -
How to open field WERKS in Internal order settlement rule
Hello experts,
Could you explain please how to add field PLANT (WERKS) in internal order settlement rules. I would like to fill out this field during the settlement process.
Any advices will be very appreciated.
Regards,
IvanHI Ivan,
Please post more details on your business scenario. Why you want to add plant field in the rule?
To which receiver you want settle your internal order? If you want to settle to a material for instance, plant will be one of the field available. Try double click on settlement rule to get to detailed screen. -
Hi
I am not an expert in Work orders and appreciate your input.
A work order has been settled to a Sales order ( I can't understand the logic behind settling to a Sales Order). The Profit centre assigned to the sales order is wrong. I.e. they need it to be the same as that in the work order.
1) Is it possible to reverse the settlement and
2) change the profit centre in the Sales order
3) Change the settlement rule of the work order
The user informed the reason to settle the work order is just merely to close the work order. Is it mandatory to settle the work order in order to close. If so could you please explain the logic behind the requirement?
Thanks & Regards
NadiniHey Vanessa,
Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
Problem solved.
Do you see any other implications on this?
Thanks again.
Pradeep -
Error in servcie work order Settlement
We have tried to process the Settlement for FCOs Service Work Orders and Warranty Contracts but we get the following error message
"Account 6810100 requires an assignment to a CO object".
I have detected that this GL account has been created as cost element from January 2010, but as far I know the GL accounts that belong to settlement process must not be created as cost element.
Now pls help how to resolve this problem
Rgd
Prakash SharmaHi
You are right ..
I checked cost element 6810100 user made following change ,
In cost element master from 01.01.2010 to 31.12.9999 .- Cost element category is- 1 Primary costs/cost-reducing revenues and earlier from 01.01.2000 to 31.12.2002 Cost element category is- 22 External settlement and also in default account assignment cost center is not assigned.
I just want to know error is coming because default account assignment is not given and also because of change in cost element category
Rgd Prakash -
Work order settled without functional area
Hello All,
We are getting an issue here, business is trying to settle a workorder by posting it through KO8G.
When the posting is done we cannot see the Functional area on the Debit Line (40), and the credit line has the work order, profit center and functional area. As the debit line does not have functional area, the data does not match in BI.
Could anyone please elaborate how can we get the FA on both the lines.
Thanks in Advance,
Tushar NerlekarWhen you issue inventory to service order, the journal entry is
Dr Consumption + Production Order (Functional area derived from order type)
Cr Inventory (B/S account doesn't need CO object assignment)
When the order settles, the accounting entry is:
Dr Consumption + Cost Center (Functional area derived from cost center master data)
Cr Consumption + Production Order (Functional area derived from order type)
In Iw33, check in Go To -> Settlement Rule at header level what is the settlement receiver? -
Can User Exit works for Settlement Rule in Maintenance Order creation?
Dear Experts,
I have this situation where I tried to create an Internal Maintenance Order via IW31 for multiple equipments from different functional location (different cost centers) using the Object List. However, the settlement rule has a problem to pull out as there's no Equipment in the reference object. That's the reason, I'm looking at the User Exit which I understand the IWO10027, can do the work. Since I'm new to User Exit, can I enhance the settlement rule by the following condition.
The costs spent on each equipment will be used as a basis of calculating the weightage (via equivalence no) for the settlement rule.
Can it be done that way?
regards,
AbrahamSanjay,
This data can be checked in the following user-exits:
COZF0001: Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
COZF0002: Change purchase req. for externally procured component
PeteA -
Process Order Settlement Rule by Order Type
Hi Experts
Our Client a requirement to have Process Order Settlement by Order Type please let me know how it can be achieved
In SAP a Process Order Variance is settled via the following Combination in OBYC :-
1 Chart of Accounts
2 Transaction PRD
3 Valuation Modifier
4 General Modifier
5 Valuation Class
6 GL Account
Can this account assignment based on the Order Type ?
Thanks
SumanDear Suman,
Normally, Order Types serves a different purpose. We can maintain default settlement rule, Costing Variants, Settlement Profiles, Number ranges etc at Order Type Level.
It is not possible to directly manage the Order Types in the Account Assignment in OBYC.
Thanks & Kind Regards
Umapathi G
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can I share my PSE8 catalog with a user on another computer using PSE6?
I want to share my PSE8 catalog with user on another computer using PSE6, so that we both organize and edit the same photos.
-
Cancelled a print job on my Officejet Pro 8500 Premier, now carriage is stuck on left side and paper roller for Tray 1 is stuck in down position. I am getting a paper jam message, but there are no jams.
-
Using your old BT home hub phones with the home hu...
If you want to use your old BT Home Hub phones with the new Home Hub 3. Here is a diagram showing how to do it. Using your BT Hub Phones with your Home Hub 3 It may help people to utilise their old phones. There are some useful help pages here, for B
-
I use babylon 8, FF4 and win7
-
Importing from a Derby Database to Oracle
Hello, Is there a tool that can help keep a Derby database and an Oracle instance in synch? We have a Derby database with many tables that we want to regularly migrate to our Oracle instances. Thank you for any information. Regards, Tony