Defaulting scale to frame size

I'm stuck. I am about to pull in a whole bunch of still images into my timeline. I know I need to go to - edit-preference-general-check the "default scale to frame size". Here is where I am lost. I need to fing the back leash key.. I can't remember where this is

We did is this way because it's the only way for us to easily reproduce that feature in AE.
Since AE doesn't support it natively, we need to emulate it. We emulate it by sticking the footage in a precomp of the 'frame size' and set the scale on the footage on that layer to make it work. One could argue that if the scale is 100% we should optimize this and just leave out the precomp, but as you can see we didn't think of that at the time.
Is that the situation you are in?
--chris

Similar Messages

Is there way to "scale to frame size" a bin of clips?

I running a 1920 x 1080 doc project in Premiere Pro CC with a range of media types and sizes. I purposely did NOT preset the "default scale to frame size" preference to maintain the quality of my still image data base to allow pans and zooms. I have since imported, logged and sub clipped a very large number of stock archive 720 x 486 QT movies. Having done so without presetting the Premiere default scaling, I am now having to apply "scale to frame size" to each edit in my sequence as I work. Is there way to "scale to frame size" my bin of clips? or am I now stuck having to convert the original 720 x 486 QT movies to 1920 x 1080 and then relinking in Premiere to maintain all my sub clipping data?

what about in the bin, select the clip, go up to the top of the screen and beside File and Edit, select Clip
then go down to Video Options
and choose Scale to Frame Size
does that do what you want?

How to apply "scale to frame size" to a bunch of stills in CS4 and most likely all PP pro.

Hello, I was looking for an answer to this procedure after trying to use the "paste attribute" function; that is ticking this option on one picture, and pasting (as attribute) it to the rest of the stills. As this did not work I finally found a Youtube video showing how simple (and embarrassing) it was. - Just highlight all your stills on the timeline and right click anywhere on the selected area. Then click on the "scale to frame size" to put a tick against it. NB In my case though a few things happened when I tried, and one I remember was that my selection had already a still with the tick against the "resize..." (as I tried and erred various other ways) so it would not work, I guess because the program already could see the tick although it's only on one still. Most likely if I hadn't learned the "paste attribute" method I would have chosen this but here you are as an erratic user I opted for the less obvious possible method! I hope this entry will help people who want a quick answer to this situation. I'm a little surprised though as I thought I read somewhere that PP as "scale to frame size" as a default!

Yes that's right Bill, I think that's what the video did show and that I tried to share in "my discussion" But Ann explained to me how to turn it on as a default from Preference which is a smarter way to go about it, providing it's done before importing the pictures in the project window. Else, yes that the way to do it!
Actually it would be nice to be able to choose the size of the frame so to fit it directly into the safe area which ever is chosen, it would cut a couple of steps when animating the still, avoiding scaling into the safe area (I'm a dreamer!)

Can PE4's "Scale to Frame Size" scaling of stills be adjusted?

I have authored a movie with over 50 stills at the end. Some of those stills have a caption that I added by enlarging the canvas with white background in Photoshop Elements and typing in people's names. Some of the captions have 1 line, some 2 lines, and some 3 lines. All the stills are about the same size, but no matter how many lines a caption has, the bottom half of the last line is cut off from view. I tried extending the bottom of the caption area, but that made the photo smaller and the white blank area just didn't look right. Next I tried cropping off the caption area and typing the caption on the bottom part of the photo itself--but the last line still gets cut off.
If I uncheck "Scale to Frame Size", the photo is huge. How can I overide PE4's default scaling so that the photos with bottom captions are small enough for the captions to fit within the Safe Title Margin instead of being cut off? The stills are digital photos 3264 pixels wide with heights varying for 2448 to 2992 pixels. My preset is widescreen 16:9.
Thanks for your help.

Sorry I couldn't respond sooner, the site kept saying try again later--then
after reading over your helpful article several times, I kept digging and
experimenting and was able to produce exactly what I wanted! So, at least
you didn't have to read the earlier reply I had composed with several more
questions.
Since I shot the video clips in widescreen mode, I batch re-sized all the
non-captioned photos to 720 X 480. That sure shortened the loading time of
Premiere! For the ones with captions, I decided the extra text at the bottom
of the photos would make the photos smaller on screen than I wanted. I used
PSE to type text on the photo itself, saved the layers, then re-sized it by
resampling to 432 (480 height X 90%). I found out how to change the ruler in
Premiere Elements from inches to pixels. I adjusted the text layer so that
the bottom line would not below the Safe Title Margin of 384 (480 X
80%)--but when put on the timeline, there was still plenty of room before
the text was cut off, so I re-positioned the text to about 395. Of course I
had to select all the stills on the timeline and uncheck the option to scale
to frame size. Now that I understand how scaling works, I can get any size
photo to fit just right!
I had struggled with how to get captions to display for a couple of years,
so I appreciate so much your pointing me in the right direction with your
response and helpful article!

Scale To Frame Size Issues with PE8

I just got a new Sony HDR-XR500V camcorder. When I render videos from PE8 (using source videos from this new camcorder) to either wmv or mpeg format, I run into one of two situations. If I check "Scale to Frame Size", then I end up video that video that has a large border around it (on all four sides) - meaning it only takes up a portion of the media player screen. If I uncheck "Scale to Frame Size" then I end up with video that is severely cropped on all four sizes - so I am missing much of the picture (but it at least takes up the entire medai player screen). Is there some other setting where I can get it to fill the entire space but not crop the video?

As Steve points out, one's Project Preset must match the source footage (Video & Audio) perfectly, or one will encounter problems.
Once that is done, and editing is complete, then you can Export/Share to desired formats/CODEC's, with desired Frame Size.
Good luck,
Hunt

"Scale to Frame Size" option - won't I lose quality?

Hello,
I have a sequence in 720p and I have most of the videos in 1080p. I want to scale all of them once, so I select them all, go to Clip->Video Options->Scale to Frame Size. But, the Scale Size shows all the time as a 100%, even after the clips are scaled down.
Question 1: Won't I lose quality if I will zoom in (but go not further than 1080p)?
Question 2: Also, I understand, that I cannot go further than 150%, right?
Thank you.

donkamiliani wrote:
I do not want to scale (Using Motion->Scale) each clip separately. I want to do it for all clips
Jeff has it technically right, but missed part of the question.
I believe the remaining part of the question is "How do I set every 1080 frame to 67% so I can use that as a starting point? All at once."
Answer: Set one clip to 67%. Copy that clip. Then, select all of the other clips and "Paste Attributes". Now all of them will be set at 67% and if you decide to zoom in to 100% you will have no quality loss.
Be sure to do that before you change any other attributes of that clip. If you have, don't worry. Just turn off that effect temporarily so you can copy just the motion effect

Scale to frame size: clip lose quality

Hi
I'm working with Premiere CS3.
I captured a clip from a Sony HVR-Z1E over IEEE1394 in a HDV Project. Settings: HDV 1080i, 25.00 Frames/Second, HD Anamorphic 1080 (1,333), upper field first.
Afterwards I import the clip in a DV Project. Settings DV PAL, 25.00 Frames/Second,D1/DV PAL Widescreen 16:9 (1, 422), upper field first.
In the timeline, I scale down the clip manually (under effectsettings/ move/scale)the clip to 53.3%. The clip lose quality. Pixels seems to be bigger. The same also happens if I check "scale to frame size".
Can anyone help me? Thanks in advance.
Regards, Corinne

Hi
Thanks for your reply. Yes that's right. But in CS2 the lose of quality was much smaller then in CS3. The clip was after scaling to 53.3% still useful. That can't be the problem.
I thought thath SD DV is upper field?
regards, Corinne

Scale to Frame Size not perfect

I am working with DV and HDV. I am scaling the HDV to frame size and it works pretty well, but there is a thin black verticle line on either side of the frame. This vanishes when I go back to a DV clip, and reappears when I go back to a scaled HDV clip.
Any ideas on how I can remove these lines/expand the image?
Many thanks,
Doug

In case it's not abundantly clear from the first three posts, PPro is behaving correctly. Scale to Frame Size adjusts the size of the source so that one dimension fits within the sequence's dimensions. In the process, it maintains the source's image aspect ratio. Therefore, if the image aspect ratio of the source does not precisely match that of the sequence, then space will be left along the sides or the top and bottom.
As Ann pointed out, HDV is exactly 16:9, whereas widescreen DV is not. Hence, narrow pillarboxes.
What you seem to be expecting, at least implicitly, is for PPro to not only scale the source but also stretch it to fill the frame completely.
You have two options to eliminate the pillarboxing:
Use the Scale effect with "Uniform Scale" option enabled, in which case you'll end up effectively cropping off the top and bottom.
Disable Uniform Scale and then bump up the Scale Width, which stretches the image.

Video tutorial: Scale to frame size

See a video tutorial from reTooled.net about the scale to frame size preference: on this page in Premiere Pro Help

See this video tutorial by reTooled.net about the Scale to Sequence preference: http://www.retooled.net/?p=234

Scale to frame size by width or height?

I've noticed that this feature scales clips with orginal aspect ratio until the width or the height first meets the frame size.
However, is there anyway to dictate that? Say I have a 720p sequence and I have a 1270x780 clip for instance.
And I want the width to be filled up entirely dispite having to cut some of the pixels off height-wise.

Use the 'Motion Effect - Scale' instead of 'Scale to Frame Size'.
Motion: position, scale, and rotate a clip
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/premierepro/cs/using/WSC7A162B6-6EF1-49e1-8622-8127366710BB.ht ml#WS0FACF67F-4C70-484f-BAA3-71B6A19DCA77
You can then copy and paste the 'Motion Effect - Scale' effect
to additional clips in the Timeline to match the scale to similar clips.

Scale to frame size, does it change clip resolution?

do you lose resolution on the chip when you do this? thanks!

It is a bit more complicated than that.
If you use the Scale to Fit you lose the pixels you are not seeing. So if you want to scale it up a little larger, like almost back up to the size it was before, you are going above 100% of the "new" image that was scaled down, and therefore you will have less of a quality image.
If you use the Motion effect's "Scale" parameter, you do not throw away the unused pixels so you can scale it back up to 100% without a loss of quality.
Therefore, if you plan on panning around the image, like Ken Burns, you want to use the Motion effect.
If you just want to use it at the new smaller size, then you are no t going to lose much visual quality either way, but keep in mind that there are less pixels and therefore the picture will not be the same. If it was vibrant and exiting at full size, it may not be quite so stunning at a smaller size.

CC Scale to Frame Size

I have just noticed that CC is behaving very strange with SD clips in and HDV sequence. It is stretching the height from the edges of the clip when paused. When playing the issue can't be noticed. Check out the two print screens. First is when paused and the second is when playing back.

If you are on 320.49 Nvidia driver roll one back.
Knows issue,

How do I create a title whose size matches my video frame size?

How do I create a 1920x1080 title?
I'm using Premiere Pro CS4 on Windows 7. I created a default title. If I right-click on the title in the Project Explorer and select properties, it says:
Title Size: 720 x 480
Pixel Depth: 32
Pixel Aspect Ratio: 0.9091
If I drag this title onto a sequence onto a sequence created from the "AVHCD 1080i30 (60i)" preset then the title is automagically scaled to try to get it to fit into the 1920x1080 frame, resulting in a tiny title centered in the frame. I can make things better by right-clicking the title in the timeline and selecting "Scale to frame size", but that's not a particularly elegant solution (and the title, as displayed in the title editor, still doesn't exactly match the title displayed in the previous monitor).
How do I create and edit a title whose size matches my video frame size?

Thanks guys! I created the first title in a 640x480 sequence and didn't notice that I had the option to fiddle with the frame size when I created it. Subsequently, I created new titles by duplicating a previously created title (which I had set up with desired font, effects, etc.) and just changing the title text in the title designer. This worked great as long as I was making titles for a 640x480 sequence. But when I tried to use a copy of this title in a different sized sequence then things got weird on me. I spent way too long trying to find the option to resize the title before I finally gave up and decided to spend the time to figure out how to post a question in this forum.
Just to verify how things work, I verified that the size of a new title does, indeed, default to the size of the currently selected sequence. No idea what would happen if I had multiple sequences displayed simultaneously.
Any idea how to change the size of an existing title?
Bob

Prelude to Premiere: Scale to Frame option

I have ingested/organized Red 4k files in Prelude and have sent the files over to premeire "sucessfully".
The problem comes when I pull a 4k file into a red timeline; (1080p). Even though my premiere's "scale to frame size" option by default is ON, the image does not scale, keeping the image at 100%, or zoomed in.
I do not see a setting anywhere in prelude for "scale to frame".
Please Assist.

This is what I've tried and did not work;
Mutiple methods to send to premiere (from prelude);
     right mouse click folder in project pannel>send to premiere pro
     Select folder in project pannel and go to file>send to premiere pro
     Select folder in project pannel and go to file>export project>Project type Final Cut XML
     Select folder in project pannel and go to file>export project>Premiere Pro
in premiere, there's no way to change the "scale to frame size after the fact (I believe), but I tried
     selecting media and right mouse click>Make offline, then relinking media
     importing premiere projects
     importing Final Cut XML
     importing prelude project (won't let you)

PRE10 - Pan and Scan Default New Frame Size

Is there a way to change the Default New Frame size for a project? I have about 4 or 5 frames per page all of which need to be enlarged and my project has a total of 90 pages. So a lot of extra time is spent resizing frames. I can set the default pan and scan times under settings but I have not found a way to start off with the correct size frame.
Thanks,
Joe..

Just wanted to thank you guys again. This all worked out perfectly. I had 92 photos which previously took me three days to put together and I did not like the results. Tonight it took me two hours and it came out ok (IMHO).
Resized all photos to 1000x751 (200dpi, 1.0 pixel size). They were 2832x2128 with 1.0 pixels
Created a new project with a default DV NTSC Standard format
Imported them into the project
Placed the first photo\scene in the timeline
I set 5 pan\scan keyframes. One overall and then 4 quarter frame size
Adjusted the lenth of the scene and pan and scan durations and saved it
Added the other 90 photos to the timeline
Copied the completed scene and then pasted the attributes to all the other photos except a few I didn't want to pan\scan
I selected the clips that had the attributes pasted to them and used the TIme Stretch to set the duration the same as the first pan\scan clip
Dragged and dropped a different transition in between each
Added titles to the beginning and end
Added sountrack music to the entire video
Shared\Exported out to MPEG with NTSC Standard 4:3 format
It took about 10 minutes to render instead of a couple hours
Is it great, to me, no. I need to work on a few things and perhaps even reshoot the pages of the album to get better originals (or take them somewhere and scanned on a larger scanner then I have to accomodate them). My wife loved it and on average I think it looks pretty good. But the process works and the time savings are incredible so the next one will be that much better.
So thanks again. I have lots more to learn but at least progress is being made.

Defaulting scale to frame size

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for