Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA

Hi,
While settling the AUC internal order,i am gettingg the below error.Kindly advice me
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
Message no. KD506
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area AFCO), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
Thanks
Supriya

Hi Supriya,
Go to SPRO-> Controlling > Internal orders>Actual postings>Settlement> Maintain Allocation structures & choose A1 and go to assignment, select the relevant category like raw material / consumption and then go to source, check the range of cost elements first then click the settlement cos t element and under that choose FXA and define the settlement cost element which must be created under 22 category.
After maintainig the above, you will not get the error anymore.
Thanks & Regards
Anuj Agarwal

Similar Messages

Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR

Hi, i work for real estate company and we just implemented SAP. were on our process of closing our books and we are tied by error during PS settlement. House repair, which is an income statement account and cost element as well, are monitored in Project Systems with settlement rule set to GL. Postings will initially be posted as Project Cost WBS and will be settled to house repair GL. however, someone advised us that only balance sheet accounts should be settled to GL. Cost and expenses should be settled to Cost Center and so we changed the configuration and business process to posting costs directly to GL house repair and settlemet rule is to be settled to CTR. After the change in configurations and settlement rule, we still cannot process settlement due to this error "Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR". Please help, i may have missed a step in system configurations. Thanks thanks

Define a settlement cost element for receiver type CTR
Check in OKO6 whether you have defined the required Settlement Cost Element to the allocation structure.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

COPA: how to identify which cost element for sender and receiver in IMG

Hi Guru,
I know my cost element for sender and receiver from the settlement document, but where in IMG, i can identify how it settup to use which cost element for my sender - order , which cost element should be used for my reciever profit segment.
Thanks,
Kick

Hi,
Go to KEI1
Select your transfer structure
double click on assignment lines
check the source and value fields to get the mapping.
Regards,
Sridevi
<i><b>Pls. assign points, if useful</b></i>

Is there a way to bypass activity type/ cost element for CJ20n Activity?

Hi Experts,
Is there a way to bypass the activity type set in the Internal tab of a particular activity in CJ20n?
Here's a background of the scenario:.
- In CJ20n, under WBS element 100->Network 10->Activity 1, under the internal tab, the activity type set up is ACT1
- Under person assignment, I have 2 resources assigned Person 1 and Person 2, with the following values:
Person 1 Work: 1.0h Dur. 10D
Person 2 Work: 2.0h Dur. 15D
- In infotype 135, person 1 has a cost element set as ACT2 and person 2 has a cost element ACT3.
- The problem is that when you bring up the Plan/ Actual comparision report (ctrl+F11 in CJ20n), the costs are consolidated for ACT1 and negates the cost elements for Person 1 and Person 2
Is there a way to bypass this and use the individual cost elements set up for person 1 and person 2?

I dont think this is possible for the scenario that you explained. I mean, you have a single activity which has 2 resources assigned and each of these resources has a different activity type. Standard SAP allows only 1 activity type for an activity.
Just a query, why dont you create 2 different activities for these resources since the activity types are diff for both?

Want to change the cost element for a activity type (KP26)

Hi,
I want to change the Allocation cost element for an activity type in KP26. I have already changed the cost element in the activity master data in KL02. Now i want to change it in KP26. I am trying to delete the existing line item in KP26 to create the new line item with the new cost element, but system not allowing to delete the existing one. It throws the error message ""Allocations with XXXXXXX/XXXX (Cost center/Activity type) exist ; deletion not possible". Can someone please help me to change the cost element?
Regards
Dev

Hi Rao and Lalit,
Thanx for you people for helping me. i havin gone doubt here. If i am deleting the existing line in KP26 and create new line with appropriage cost element will it be cause the existing datas? I don't want to go for another activity type, because our process is a complex process exist all over the world in more than 300 company codes. So i want to use the existing activity type but want to change the allocation cost element alone. Is there any possibility to change the cost element alone?
Regards,
Dev

Cost elements for WIP (TCODE : OKGA)

Hi All,
I am working with Production Order wip calculation, varaince and settlement.
In the RA key configuraion,(for WIP calculation)In OKGA, tcode we define, the cost elements for a perticular line id, for WIP calculation.
I wanted to know, what is the purpose of these two cost elements.
If I execute line item report, I dont see any value on these cost elements, after wip calc and settlement.
However, I see the work in process on it, in the layout. I want to know, the exact purpose of these cost elements assignment.
Is there any internal controlling document that is getting posted?
Regards
SR

Hi Swastik,
Those cost elements (category 31) are used to calculate and store WIP values at the detailed level of so called line IDs.
Line IDs are groups of cost elements that were posted to production order.
For example you can calculate and store WIP separately for Raw Materials, Semis, Activities and overhead.
You can also settle them to different GL Accounts via mapping in txn.OKG8.
Hope it helps,
Szymon

G/L accounts or cost elements for maintenance order

Hi,
Can anybody explain the following.
1- What are the applications of inventory and consumption cost element / GL accounts, while posting goods issuance, good receipt and maintain service entry sheet with reference of maintenance orders' reservations and purchase requisitions? I want to know which cost element or GL account is debit and credit during every posting. And What are their impacts on maintenance order?
2- What is the purpose of "source" (cost element group) and "settlement cost element assignment" in allocation structure when we want settle maintenance order on cost center?
3- On which accounting term, the maintenance order should be settled, cost center or GL account? what is the best practices?
Regards,

Goods Issue & Goods Receipt:
In OBYC, G/L account for Inventory posting & Offset account for that Inventory posting will be maintained. Inventory posting will be BSX & Offset will be GBB.
In Material Master, valuation class will be assigned. Based on this valuation class, this entry will be taken.
Service Entry Sheet:
Problem with Service Entry Sheet creation through ML81N
service entry sheet

Report by Internal Order that includes cost element and order type

Good Morning Gurus'
Is there an SAP Standard Report that shows Internal order, cost element and order type? I find many with order, but not order type.
Thanks a million!!

Hi,
No, I don't think so. You can create a workaround by defining order group based on order type by intervals. Or, of course, develop your own report.
Regards,
Eli

Grouping cost elements to Activity types?

Hi friends,
We created Machine hours activity & Labor hour activity in production cost centers for charging to production orders.
We are able to see in cost center report the over/under adsorption for that cost center.
Since there are many primary cost elements making up these activity costs and since many activities are done at cost center, we are not able to find out what is Planned / Actual cost per each activity.
For the above problem, Is the any feature by which we can combine primary cost elements for that cost center under particular activity type?
Full points will be rewarded.
Thanks & Regards
Ravi

Using kah1 group all relevant cost elements

Internal order for receiver types

Hi,
Is possible to set up an additional order +_*for receiver types*_ that can settle to an asset account number. presently we donu2019t have this type but it may be use full for track our assets.
It is very urgent I will assign points
Thanks
Radha

Is it at the time of creation of Internal order master data or at the time of posting entries to the Internal Order?
Can you explain in detail?

Two Cost Element for the same GL

Hi,
We have 2 Company Codes - 1000 & 2000. We are using same CoA in both the Company Codes. We have a GL, say 12345678 for posting short/excess amount. So during MIRO, the accounting entry would be:
GR/IR a/c dr.          10,000
GL 12345678                  2
                   Vendor            10,002
GL 12345678 would be dr or Cr would depend on short/excess amount.
We have created Cost Element for this GL 12345678. If I post the MIRO without attaching a Cost Center to this Cost Element system thows an error to attach the Cost Center. I have separate Cost Center for Company Codes 1000 & 2000 however I can only put one Cost Center in this Cost Element.
Can anyone advice how can I post the above mentioned entry with different Cost Center. This line item (GL 12345678) is generated automatically and the Cost Center field is greyed out hence I don't have option to enter the Cost Center during MIRO. I checked the FSG of this GL, Cost Center field is 'Optional' over there.
Thanks,
Sandy

Solution Option* -You can assign Differant Cost Centers to Company Code 1000 and Company Code 2000 in OKB9 Transaction Code.Follow the below process....
--- Go to OKB9
--- Select New Entries button
--- Give the Company Code 1000 in first row and 2000 in 2nd row
--- Enter the Cost element 12345678 for company code 1000 and 2000
--- Enter the relevent cost centers for company code 1000 and 2000
--- Select Save
Thanks
Fit 4 Nothing

How to get Cost element for a component in co03 cost analysis report

Hi,
I'm using table COSP to find the quantity for a production order component. However, I need to identify the cost element first to get the unique data. In CO03 cost analysis report, there is cost element for the component. Does anyone know how to get it ?
Thanks.

CSKA stores the basic info about the cost element
There is no data in CSKB.
I'm trying to use different tables to get the cost element.
AUFK, AFKO, AFPO, RESB, ...but no luck...

Cost elements for TAX expenses

Dear all,
Is it necessory to create cost elements for following GL's ??
We are not going to implement PCA here.We are going to implement Product Costing.
50000031     EXCISE DUTY - PURHASE
50000032     SALES TAX C.S.T-PUR
50000033     SALES TAX M.S.T-PUR
50000034     EXCISE REBATE CENVAT
50000035     SALES TAX (PUR)
50000044     EXCISE REBATE CONSUM
50100000     CLOSING STOCK OF SEM
50100001     CLOSING STOCK OF FIN
50100002     OPENING STOCK - SEMI
50100003     OPENING STOCK - FINI
50100058     ROUNDING OFF
50100138     Cost of Goods Sold
50200011     PREVIOUS YEAR EXPENS
50200012     PREVIOUS YEAR TAXES
50200013     Doubtful Advances Provisions
50200014     Doubtful Debts Provisions
50200015     Realized Loss on Foregn exchange
50200016     Unrealized Loss on Foregn exchange
Thanks & regards,
Ranjeet

Ranjeet
Check your Previous threads answer
Anup

Can we create a cost element for a Balance Sheet account?

Hi folks,
Is it possible to create a cost element for a balance sheet account? If yes, what are the scenerios we would need it and how is it done?
thanks in advance

Hello
Please review the below information regarding cost elements category 90 : Financial Accounting Balance Sheet Accounts
Category 90 is automatically assigned when you create cost elements in CO whose   general ledger accounts in FI are asset reconciliation accounts
(special balance sheet accounts), not income statement accounts. You
cannot change this category in CO master data maintenance.
FI does not require CO account assignments to cost elements of
category 90. However, if you enter an account assignment, it is only
recorded statistically for real objects.
Category 90 allows you to check order or project budgets for fixed
asset procurement. To do so, enter the investment order or WBS element
in the corresponding field in the asset master. The Asset Management
component ensures that the order or element automatically appears in
the document when you access the asset procurement.
The R/3 System debits the order/WBS element statistically in the
Controlling component, which you can then monitor with availability
control.
You can treat cost elements of category 90 as activity-independent as
part of cost center planning.
Also see note 75980 for further information. From the note:
The use of cost element category 90 is only provided in the standard
system in the following two cases:
1. As of Release 3.0G, asset acquisitions and down payments which are
      assigned directly to a fixed asset or asset under construction can
      be assigned to an account on internal orders or WBS elements
      statistically. In this manner, for example, an availability check
      can be triggered on the order or the WBS element for asset posting.
2. As of Release 4.0, cost elements of category 90 can also be created
      for material stock accounts to display material make-to-order stocks
      on sales orders or customer projects.
Regards
Javier Reviriego

Default GL account (cost element) for external service contracts

Hi everybody,
question about GL being defaulted from contract for external services
The requirement is to have GL (cost element) being defined per service sub item defaulting to work order. Account assignment is unknown, because the costs might be settled later to cost center or AFE or else.
You could default cost element either through material group (which doesn't enable cost element to contract) or with account assignment category 'K' or 'F' which do not suit, cause the former requires cost center, that is unknown yet, whereas the latter requires assignment to order which doesn't make sense at all. Theoretically, it could be done with acc assignment cat 'U' , but cost element is not enabled with that category..
I was assuming that cost center which you are required to enter along with cost element while creating service sub item referring to some sort of internal accounting. The system also requires service sub item acc assignment category being aligned with requisition (which is 'F') and would in fact create PR referrencing actual work order number. But still, doesn't it make sense having contract referencing another order.. Also, we don't use default values for PM ext operation data.
So, the question is how to accomplish the requirement with Unknown assignment category? what is the point of defining cost center in the contract in given circumstances? Is there any work around exists?
Thanks in advance
Sergey

Hi,
Try this: IMG -> Plant Maintenance and Customer Service -> Maintenance and Service Processing -> Maintenance and Service Orders -> Functions and Settings for Order Types -> Create Default Value Profiles for External Procurement.
After that assign it to order type: Default Values for Task List Data and Profile Assignments.
Regards,
Rogério Reis

Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for