Define Lock-Relevant Fields

Hi there ,
As per my understanding if we set the lock indicator for the field in SPRO then we cannot change the value of that field in the material master in future .......
Am I correct ?? Please comment..
Thanks & Regards
Kaushik

Hi
If any field you make it as Lock-relevant field and for any material you have locked using MM02 by clicking Lock(CtrlShiftF1) , saved. then that particular field value cannot be modified for that material.
In test systems, you can set fields flagged as lock-relevant to
non-lock-relevant at any time. You do this by cancelling the
Lock-relevant indicator. In production systems, you can do this only if there are no locked materials in the system. If locked materials already exist, you can only flag further fields as lock-relevant.
Regards,
Krishna Mohan

Similar Messages

Lock relevant fields.

Hi all
What is the significance of lock relevant fields in materialmaster.
The actual problem is:
I have made a field as required entry in material master. I have done the settings correctly. But i'm not able to see the particular field in the material master creation screen.
When i save the master data it says "Error in posting" which says that the paricular field is required. In the long text it says those fields may be lock relevant.
In OMSFIX the indicator for lock reevant is not set for the particular field.
I dont know where exactly the issue is.
Can any one give me some light in this regard.
Thanks in Advance,
Shakthi.

Hi,
Go to OMSR and check the status of field by clicking field selection group.arrow at rigth hand side of fields.it must be hide.
rewards point if helpful,
Regards,
Chetan.

Lock/ disable field in planned order MD12

Dear expert,
Can we lock the field in planned order? In my case, I want the purchasing staff to be able to change only the production version, for others field i want them to be locked. Therefore the purchasing cannot change any fields in there except the production version.
this is due to the need for material subcon.
Maybe u can give any advice. what should i do?? do i need to make new customizing t-code for ex: ZMD12 or just make new customizing from authorization t-code su3?
Thanks
Pauline

Dear Pauline,
Check in SE93,by creating a new T Code ,with the start object as Transaction with variant.
Transaction type: Variant transaction
In the SAP Reference IMG, under "Basis Components" -> "Application Personalizaion" -> "Tailoring of Application Transactions", you can define transaction variants. These allow you to preassign values to fields within a transaction, define field attributes, or hide entire screens.
To run a transaction variant, you define a variant transaction. On the next screen, enter the name of the transaction and the name of the variant.
Note
Variant transactions are client-specific.
If you try to start a variant transaction and the corresponding variant does not exist, the transaction runs without a variant.
If the above does not helps you means,check this link to explore more,
Transaction variant
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Defining fillable form fields in IDCS4

2 questions:
Is it possible to define fillable form fields in ID that will export to PDF?I create a lot of custom proposals and would like to avoid having to define the fields over and over again in Acrobat.
Also, some clients tell me that they can't fill in the form with Acrobat Reader. When I enable the PDF for commenting in reader, all the form fields disappear, except, oddly, for the signature field. Using Acrobat Pro 9.2. Help with this will also be appreciated.
Thanks,
Michele

Great resource...thank you!
From: BobLevine <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 09:43:01 -0700
To: Michele DeFilippo <[email protected]>
Subject: Defining fillable form fields in IDCS4
1. No. But the auto form creation tools in Acrobat are excellent.
2. Don't make the form commentable. By using the distribute form command in
Acrobat everything is done automatically.
You might want to view this video:
http://www.theindesigner.com/blog/episode-53%E2%80%A6sort-of
Bob
>

Created form in Livecycle Designer 8, send to 2nd party to complete some fields, want to lock those fields so that when sent to 3rd party to complete cannot edit

I am a newby to this product and have created a form from a PDF. I used Adobe Livecycle Designer to place text fields in form. I saved, then enabled user rights. I sent to 2nd party to open in Adobe reader. This person needs to populate some of the fields. Once this is done the 2nd person is to email to 3rd person who will complete the outstanding fields and return the form to the second person.
How do I stop the 3rd person from editing the text the second person put in the form?
I want the second person to receive the complete form back not just the responses put in the text fields? Does this happen automatically or do you have to tell it send complete form.
Thanks from Sandra in Australia

How do you save the file? Do you directly send it via mail with a button? (If the question is silly I'm sorry, because I have no lincenses... so I am completly unaware of the choices you have.)
You need to be able to save a file Reader Extension licenses I think...
Probably you should ask for the fake E-Mailbutton, to be able to send it to different people one after the other...
Make an invisible Decimalfield.
The preSave/preSubmit field javascript...:
this.rawValue = this.rawValue + 1
if (this.rawValue > 0)
{Decimalfield1.access="readOnly";}
if (this.rawValue > 1)
{Decimalfield2.access = "readOnly"}
will lock decimalfield1 after the first save/submit and decimalfield2 after the second. Normally that should do the job.
PS: Another way to save the document and lock ALL fields, you don't have to buy additional licenses is print it as pdf.

How to add a user defined HTTP header field?

Hi, everyone!
I want to add a user defined HTTP header field to a HTTP
response header.
I use the following statements in testHeader.jsp
response.addHeader("myheader", "123");
response.sendRedirect("middleHeader.jsp");
in middleHeader.jsp,
out.print(request.getHeader("myheader"));
But the output in middleHeader.jsp is null!
How to add a user defined HTTP header field to a HTTP
response header? Are there some sample codes?
Cheers,
George

the send redirect actually creates a new request (through the client) and thus a new response
thus the headers you set in the response are gone for the next request/response
You can try servletDispatcher.forward

GRC 10.01 - RCM report to be added with control relevance fields

Hi GRC Experts,
I
I need to add Control relevance fields into the RCM report - Risk and control Matrix. I added through the IMG node as below:
Governance, Risk and Compliance-->Reporting-->Maintain Report Column Settings and selected the F7 report and clicked the columns and added the fields CN_RELEVANCE and CN_RELEVANCE_T. It worked fine in the Development system.
When I moved the transport into QA, the RCM report is not having any columns to display and it says 'Table does not contain visible columns'.
Appreciate any help on this issue.
Regards,
Saran.

Hi Ravi,
Can you try in the following IMG path.. I never faced this, but gut feel says importing report from 000 should help
IMG Path is Controlling > Cost Center Accounting > Information System > Standard Reports
Regards
Ajay M

Locking Selected Fields on Submit

Hello,
I've been working on a multiple-item quote request form. My intention is that Party A (Requestor) will fill in the item description and details necessary for Party B (Vendor) to provide a quote. The form will be emailed to the Vendor who will complete the remaining fields (price and delivery) and email the form back to the Requestor.
The item description and details (provided by Requestor) and the item price and delivery (provided by Vendor) are both wrapped in thier own subform and both are contained in a repeating subform. I've scripted the buttons that add/delete instances of the subform for each separate item being quoted and the button that emails the form to the Vendor. It took me a long time, but I finally got the buttons to work!
Now I'd like to find a way to 'lock' the fields filled by the Requestor when the form is emailed but still leave the fields open that need to be completed by Vendor. I'd also like to lock the contact information fields at the top at the same time. I've attached a JPEG with the form layout to clarify...
I've been reading a lot of old posts regarding similar topics and tried some of the solutions provided but cannot seem to make them work for my application. The closest I've been able to come is locking the entire form. I have the form set to email on event=click of the "Submit to Vendor via Email" button and the locking action on the event=mouseup of the same button.
Does anyone know how I should approach this? I'm begining to think I designed my form and myself into a corner! Unfortunately I do not have a server on which to host the form but would be happy to email it to anyone willing to help.
Thanks,
Jake

I dont know what I was thinking. After some rest, and a second look, I can see this what the code is doing.
I am trying to provide a button that will lock elements on individual pages that are part of multiple instances. Note, each instance will contain said button.
Example: TRANSMITTAL[3].lockButton should only lock items on that instance of TRANSMITTAL[3].
The two attempts had different results
form1.TRANSMITTAL.lockButton::click - (JavaScript, client)
var j = _TRANSMITTAL.count;
for (var i=0; i<j; i++){
var currentSubform = xfa.resolveNode("TRANSMITTAL[" + i + "]");
varLOCK.LockAllFields(currentSubform, "Lock");
..resulted in Locking ALL instances.
form1.TRANSMITTAL.lockButton::click - (JavaScript, client)
varLOCK.LockAllFields(form1.TRANSMITTAL);
..resulted in nothing.
Any suggestions?

Error to Define Tax Relevancy Of Master Records

Hi ,
I created a condition type ( Y007) with category as 'D' ( TAX) and class as 'A'. and then i tried to Define Tax Relevancy Of Master Records ( Customer taxes) but it gives the message "Condition type Y007 is not defined for taxes" . its fine when i use the class as 'D' or 'G' but the requirement is it should be 'A' as discount or surcharge.
Any one can help on this if this is possible??
if not then the other situation is if i use class as 'D' or 'G' then in the section"changes which can be made" the calculat. type disappears...is there any way to have it appear on the screen??
thanks...

Hi
For tax condition types, condition class should also be D.
Pls check the configuration for MWST condition type. If you have the need to create a new condition type, please copy MWST or some standard tax condition type and create a new one, instead of creating a new condition type itself. Also check for the access sequence. For tax condition types most of the times MWST access sequence will be the correct one.
So, the tax c.type should have D both in condition category and condition class.
You can have c.class as D (Not G) and then you can have the calculation type as A
Rwd points if it helps.

What is the use of CM relevance field in DMS ?

Hi DMS gurus,
What is the use CM relevance field in DMS ?
Is there any specific scenario ?
Regards,
Sunny

Hi Sunny,
Usually CM (Configuration Management) is used when lifecycle phases come into picture as in lifecycle phases each phase has its own configuration which has to be maintained.
During their life, products and projects go through various life-cycle phases such as engineering and design, sales, production, and maintenance. In each life-cycle phase, a product has different configurations. A configuration is made up of multiple different objects that describe the product in the relevant life-cycle phase. For example, these can be documents, materials, BOMs or other objects. The grouping of objects changes over the course of time and is different from life-cycle phase to life-cycle phase.
Configuration Managment can be very much used when we make use of ECR/ECM (engineering change request/engineering change order) linked with DMS.
Thank You,
Manoj

COPA - delta relevant field

hi experts,
I have created COPA data source in keb0, the delta method shows as Generic delta. here i have not done any settings for delta management. but when i do Full, init & delta info packages it woks correctly.
i have some doubts... on whether delta relevant field is set automatically here. if so, how do we know which field it is.?
also,
what is the difference between generic delta and timestamp delta..
should we do any settings related to delta, so as to make delta work correctly.
regards.

can anyone explain different fields of exmethods in roosource like
V          Transparent Table or DB View
D          Fixed Domain Value
F1         Function Module (Complete Interface)
F2         Function Module (Simple Interface)
FS         Function Module (Segmented Data Transfer)
Q          Extraction Using ABAP Query
A          DataSource Append
2. is extractor RKE_BIW_GET_DATA_API automatically created, is this FM getting automatically changed when we append fields to structure of a data source?
regards.

How to define the customer field in SC as mandatory

Hi all,
Could someone help me to define the customer field as
mandatory in the shopping cart?
Thank you a lot.
Best regards,
Danijela

Hi Danijela,
you could implement the BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI and check if the customer field is filled. If not, you can issue an error message (Type 'E') in the BAdI. This message will be visible in the browser. The user will only be able to order the shopping cart when this error message is gone.
Best Regards,
Olaf

How do I lock a field so the current type in it cannot be overriden?

how do I lock a field so the current type in it cannot be overriden?

You can make the field Read Only. You need to be aware that if the form is cleared the typed value in the field will clear and the text in the "Options" "Default Value" will become the field's value. You can use JavaScript to make a form field Read Only and set the default value.

Locking form fields

I have an approval form that requirs input from several people. I would like to lock an individual's form field after they have entered data. Is this possible and if so, can someone tell me how to accomplish it?

Yes ....I would wrap the two different parts that each user has to fill out in a subform and then create a scripting function to lock all fields in a given subform. I have included a sample that will show you the scripting object to do the locking. In this case it is locking the entire form, but if you pass in the subform that you want to lock then it will only lock the fields below the subform. The code to call the scripting obejct is behind the lclick event of the lock fields button. In my case I am passing in form1 (which is the root node of the form).
Paul

How do i lock all fields without using the signature function with adobe lifecycle designer 9

How do i lock all fields without using the signature function with adobe lifecycle designer 9 ...
I want it to have the same affect as when a signature is used but not use that function. I want a button that says lock all fields. And then you can click it again to unlock all fields...
Thanks

Here you go!
LOCK the form once its SAVEd?

Define Lock-Relevant Fields

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for