Define Logical Systems and Template Names for BW Reports

Hi experts
I would like to know if someone used the mentioned functionality 'Define Logical Systems and Template Names for BW Reports, I would like to know too IF I create a Z REPORT for example in webdynpro and insert it in this configuration it will work and where it will appear in sourcing cockpit?
sds.
Javier

Hello Muthu,
BW reports will be shown in SRM Box if the corresponding BW roles for SRM are integrated with SRM roles.
You might to activate the corresponding datasource of this in SRM.
And since you have to connect the source system to BW, I think you have to define SRM system as logical system in BW.
Regards,
Pavan

Similar Messages

Logical system and rfc destination related Query?

Hi Dudes
Do we need to define logical system and RFC destination if they are in different clients in same server
Regards
Raj Kumar

Hi
Both are client independent setting, so even if you define in one client, it would be available in other clients also.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Defining Logical System name for ALE using T.C- SPRO?

Hi,
Can anybody tell, how to define logical system name using T.C SPRO?
Where can I find the "Define Logical System for ALE"?
Thanks
Balaji

HI,
Use the SALE transaction , there you can have all steps clearly,
please see the below links
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/cdded790-0201-0010-6db8-beb9bb2b2660
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/12/22/file-to-multiple-idocs-xslt-mapping
/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/06/24/convert-any-flat-file-to-any-idoc-java-mapping
Regards
Chilla..

Define Logical Port and Back-End Destinations for ESOA use of this config

Hi,
Please let me know what is the use of this config I am not able to get a documentation.
Define Logical Port and Back-End Destinations for ESOA

Hi Autobots,
Even I am looking for the same information. Did u get some headstart into the matter?
Pl provide me with the inputs too.
Cheers
Nikhil

Logical system and business system

Hi experts, please help me with the below questions---
1) What is the diff between logical system and business system?
2)what is the difference between logical system(defined in R/3) and business system (defined in SLD) in idoc to file scenario.
3) Is it require to give the logical system name of the xi server(Which we define in idx1 port) to the 3rd party system(Application system at the FTP side) to carry out file to idoc scerario?

Hi,
Business System :
1. Business systems are logical systems, which function as senders or receivers within XI. Business systems can be SAP systems or third-party systems. Depending on the associated technical system.
2. Business Systems should be mandatory used when dealing with Idoc's and Proxies .
Business Service:
1. Business Service requires manual adding on Inbound and Outbound Interfaces, Business Systems do not.
2. Business Services are maintained across environments and so, their names cannot be changed. Business Systems names can be changed across environments by providing SLD level transport targets.
3.In the Business Services we cannot maintain the Group and Targets in SLD. For Ease in transporting your ID/Configuration objects Groups and Targets are used in SLD for Business Systems.
4.Business Service has no SLD Entries and No Assigned Products and SWCV's
Regards
Sangeetha

Transaction Launcher Logical Systems and URLs

Hi,
I'm facing a problem with Transaction Launcher.
I've done all the settings specified here: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm60/helpdata/en/46/231befc17b5872e10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
Under section "Define Transaction Launcher Logical Systems and URLs" I've specified the values for Quality System: the ECC system is MQAS200A
By the way, when I try to access an ERP Sales Order, the transaction CRM_TL_ERP_BUS2032_DISPLAY tries to access system MSVL200A (which is the Development ECC System).
I cannot change the Logical System within the Transaction Launcher Configuration (currently it is set to ERP), since the Transaction is standard.
Does anybody know how to map the generic value ERP with the correct value MQAS200A instead of MSVL200A?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Andrea Ricci

Hi,
You cannot generalize the Logical system name, for the workaround you need to put the logical system for quality and transport it to quality and it should work and to check in dev you need to again change the log. sys to dev and save it but dont transport it. Similarly you can do for production system.
Regards,
Shobhit

Configuring ALE Logical Systems and Partner Profiles

hi,
Trying to build a scenario which deals with two third party systems transfering XML file from one to another. Sender is using a file adapter. Reciever is using an Idoc adapter. However the pre-requisite mentioned for this exercise are that ALE logical systems and partner profiles must be configured (these steps are not outlined in the exercise) . Could i get help on what steps i need to carry out for sender/reciever to configure logical systems and partner profiles.
regards,
Manpreet

Hi Manpreet
At the R/3 system the partner profile should be maintained for both the third parties.
for creating the partner profile go to transaction we20, give the
partner number :your logical system name or customer number or vendor no
partner type:LS(logical system)or ku(customer)OR LI(vendor)
give the message type in the outbound parameters
after this double click on the message type and give the login deatils for the RFC destination define the port and all
if you still have problem please reply back
Thanks
Rinku

AC 5.3 Logical systems and multiple Physical systems

HI all:
We have set up a Logical System, and then have hooked up 2 Physical systems to it. Based on the documentation from SAP, the rule set (and the way we set it up) is at the Logical system level.
Physical system #1 is reporting the correct results, however, Physical system #2 results are not complete. My understanding is that both Physical systems should be drawing from the rule set based in the Logical system.
Results: Physical system #1 - correctly identifies 10 risks
Physical system #2 - incorrectly only identifies 5 of the expected 10 risks.
Role assignment to user is exactly same, authorizations are exactly the same. The User/Role/Profile Full Sync has been repeated as part of troubleshooting.
Has anyone experienced this? I'm looking for ideas/options on where to investigate why the results are different.
Thanks
Margaret

HI:
Thanks for answering!! I'm having trouble understanding the answers, sorry.
When you have a logical system...you upload the rules once to that system, and generate them. Then when you set up a physical system and hook it up to the logical system...the 1st, 2nd or 3rd physical system....they all use the same ruleset. The whole concept (as I understand) is that the use of Logical and Physical systems...and putting the rule set on the Logical system so you don't have to worry about one rule set taking precedence over another, is an advantage, if this is possible (ie: we don't have multiple rule sets).
Where should I be checking that the risks are defined properly? The rule set is the delivered one from SAP. The functions and risks match what we had (plus more) in the CC 4.0 system.
The first physical system we set up (example: Development) works fine, and all regular SoD risks are coming up as expected. When we added another system (example: Test)...the results of SoD analysis were incomplete.
Does that help clarify? Perhaps I'm just missing something?
Margaret
Edited by: Margaret Sokolov on Apr 28, 2009 4:34 PM

Define logical system

Hi Gurus,
I installed BI7, and want to be define logical system for creating client. I login from default user sap*/DDIC, IMG, transaction SALE), choose Bisic Setting-> Logical Systems->® Define Logical System; I received message can not create for this user, only display.
Please help me, how I can create logical system?
Thanks
Shahid

in which client have you tried creating logical system by using SAP* and DDIC
First create BASIS userid in that client and do the changes in SCC4 and SE06. Then define logical system for your client in the format <SID><CLNT><Clint NO.>
Hope this would help you.

Logical System and Client copy

Hi Gurus ,
             I just now finished ECC 6.0 successfully , I want to take the client copy . But i hacve one doubt , In client creation one TAB logical system is there , Kindly advice me how to create Logical system and steps .
Regards
Selvan

Hi Manjula ,
              Below i mentioned the full detail about the error .
    RFC destination for client copy in systems with Financials Basis     (FINBASIS) component.
The system could not find any suitable RFC destination for processing     for client 000.     This note also appears if an RFC destination was found but this does not     work.     o   RFC destination: FINBTR@ID3CLNT000     o   Error text: Error during the retrieval of the logon data     Proceed as follows to eliminate this error:
1. Start the wizard to create a new RFC connection     or perform the following steps manually:     1. Create an RFC destination with the target ZK>source client of client         copy (in this case 000).
2. Check whether the RFC destination works in transaction SM59.         To avoid errors when assigning the password or the authorizations of         the RFC user, use the authorization test Test -> Authorization.
3. Enter the RFC destination:         -   Transaction: FINB_TR_DEST (Destinations for Transport Methods of             the Financials Basis)         -   Client: 000
4. Start the client copy again.
Kindly advice me
selvan

Logical system and rfc destination

hello all,
what is the difference between logical system and RFC destination?
thanks for ur help in advance.
regards,
vikas

Hi,
In any ALE scenario u need one sender and one receiver system.
Logical systems are just logical representation of these systems but in case of RFC destination u specify technical parameters for those systems like IP address and username and password to connect to that system.
Thus when u create port i.e.we21 u specify actual RFC destination for the system to which u want to connect and when u create partner profile for that logical system u specify this port so when u want to send data to this logical system i.e receiver system port will be used which in turn has RFC destination which will be used to connect to that system.
In simple terms logical systems are logical representation of any system and RFC destinations are physical/techinical systems.
Regards

Field and Table name for purchaser

I want to know the field and table name for purchaser id and purchaser name.
Plz help me.

Dear
Purchaser name are define in Header level data in Purchase Order EKKO & Purchase ID define as a Purchasing Group
Purchser Name EKKO-ERNAM
Purchase I D EKKO-EKGRP
Regards
Aamir

Using Office 2013 group policy template to define Trusted Locations and Template Locations doesn't work

User Configuration/Policies/Administrative Templates
- Using Office 2013 group policy template to define Trusted Locations and Template Locations doesn't work
Microsoft Word 2013/Word Options/Security/Trust Center/Trusted Locations
- Allow Trusted Locations on the network:
Enabled
- Trusted Location #1:
Enabled
Path: //server/sharedfoldername [Edit: Path:
\\server\sharedfoldername]
Date: June 10, 2013
Description: Trusted Location
Allow sub folders: Enabled
The policy appears to apply to the client correctly by adding the following registry key and values:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\office\15.0\word\security\trusted locations\location1
allowsubfolders: 1
date: June 10, 2013
Description: Trusted Location
Path: //server/sharedfoldername [Edit: Path:
\\server\sharedfoldername]
However, when you open Word Options/Trust Centre/Trust Centre Settings…/Trusted Locations
There are no trusted locations listed under ‘Policy Locations’
I have tried setting similar settings for setting the Shared Templates folder location and just like the trusted locations policy, the registry keys are created properly in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies however word doesn’t
seem to recognize these either.
This used to work flawlessly using the administrative templates for Word 2007 and 2010. Has anyone been able to get these policies to apply successfully, or know why office doesn’t recognize these settings from the Policies registry
Key?

This would have been an easy solution to the issue. Unfortunately it isn't the problem. This question was originally posted on another Microsoft site and
was transferred here and when it was transferred the path's changed from the original post:
\\server\sharedfodlername to //server/sharedfoldername. (I will edit the question to show up as it did in the original post) Not sure how that happened. This
is still an issue that I haven't been able to get working correctly.
As it turns out the 'New from Template' interface Word 2013 has developed is very bulky with large thumbnails and is not very customizable nor practical for an office
that has a large number of templates. Because I am unsatisfied with the display and performance of the 'New' template chooser I sought after a solution to change the way word creates a document from a template in another thread:
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2013_release-word/how-can-you-change-the-display-of-templates-in/d49194b9-a6b4-4768-8502-7d7b50e9dd65 working through this issue with Jay we were able to develop
some VB script with handles a very large number of templates in a list view and it works much faster than the built-in Word interface. The above thread is how I've worked around trying to define a shared template location and I am quite happy with it.

Is it possible to chenage logical system and how after a system is beeing u

Hello
I wander is it possible to chenage logical system and how after a system is beeing used for a while and how?

Hello Tina,
If the system is NOT a production system transaction BDLS can be used to change the logical system. This would be necessary after refreshing a dev system from a production system, for example.
If the system is a production system, I would agree that this is NOT advisable.
Regards
Greg Kern

Definnig logical path and file names

hallow experts,
i wont to now about definnig logical path and file names,
did some one have something that can help me in that
regards

Hi Rodrigo,
Have a look at this link... i guess it explains what you are looking for...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/3e4ec2462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm
regards,
Naveen

Define Logical Systems and Template Names for BW Reports

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for