Define Planning levels for Logistics (Liquidity forecast).

Hi Gurus,
  I am defining planning levels for logistics for my client inorder to see the purchase order items in liquidity forecast report FF7A/FF7B but I can only assign one vendor planning group to M2 as my requirement  requires all vendor planning groups to be assigned to M2 to see all the purchase orders items for all the vendor planning groups. Does anybody has any idea how do we assign?
Thanks,
Bob

Hi Nirmal,
  I think that is for displaying per cash management group but thanks nirmal for replying.
Regards,
Bob

Similar Messages

  • T.c FF7B: planning levels for Logistics

    Hi All,
    With reference to the Report FF7B and the CM data from Logistics,
    I've defined the  planning levels for logistics and the others steps under the CASH MANAGEMENT menù of SPRO.
    But the report FF7A doesn't prodide me the logistic data... are there other customizing steps out of the CASH MANAGEMENT menù of SPRO.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    If you have done the config as mentioned by Kalyan, i.e. define planning groups, assign/link them to planning levels and assign the appropriate planning level in customer/vendor master data either you run FF7B (for liquidity forecast) or even you can run FF7A, but need to tick the check box for liquidity forecast.
    thanks,
    Kumar

  • Select planning level for forecast caluculation manually

    Dear all,
    In S&OP on HANA we would like to run the forecast on a more aggregated level than the base planning level.
    The base planning level in the input/output key figure of the forecast profile is supposed to be lower than the level which should be used for forecast calculation. If the filter in the forecast profile menu is set to the higher level, the forecast is still calculated on the base planning level and aggregated according to the settings in the key figures.
    Is it possible to manually define the planning level the statistical forecast is supposed to be run on?
    Thank you in advance!
    Jamie

    Hi Nikhita
    There is a transaction " define planning levels for logistic". In this step you allocate transaction from MM and SD to the planning levels you ahve defined.  this allocation is neccessary since the system cannot determine planning level  by using master record fields as it does to access data from FI.
    In FI planning level for G/L is specified in  G/L master.  However a business transaction in logistics is represented by an Internal ID
    1 = PR
    2 = PO
    3 = Scheduling agreement
    you must assign these transactions to a plannning level  in CM
    T-code :- Financial Supply Chain Management> Cash and Liquidity Management>Cash Management>Structuring>Define planning levels for Logistics
    Please let me know if you ahve done this setting. Would advise you to revisit your config for INT code - level- Planning group.
    Hope this helps. Please let me know if you still cant get around.
    Thanks
    Sanjeev

  • Selecting the Planning Level for Statistical Forecast in S&OP on HANA

    Hello together,
    we currently face an issue regarding the statistical forecast in S&OP on HANA:
    The customer wants to implement an S&OP process containing the two steps statistical forecast (automatically calculated) and sales forecast (manually determined). The planning level of the statistical forecast should be higher than the planning level of the sales forecast, i.e. the statistical forecast is calculated on a higher planning level and then disaggregated to be an input for the manually determined sales forecast.
    Since it doesn't seem to be possible to disaggregate any key figure below its base planning level we need to have the lower sales planning level as base planning level in all key figures, including the input and output key figures of the statistical forecast.
    When running a statistical forecast with a defined forecasting profile, the planning level used for the forecast seems to be the base planning level of the input/output key figures defined in the forecasting profile.
    However, we need to define a higher planning level for the statistical forecast in order to have a better data base for recognizing trends and sesonality. In APO DP it is possible to define the planning level for the forecast when running/scheduling the forecasting job. Is this also possible in S&OP on HANA? Can we define the planning level for the forecast in the forecasting profile or when running the forecast from the Excel AddIn? I tried to use the field "Filter" in the forecasting profile as it listed all the planning levels (as well as a lot of other things, we don't know where they come from), but the forecast was still carried out on the base planning level.
    Do you have any other idea where to define the forecasting planning level that is different from the base planning level of the input/output key figures?
    Thank you in advance,
    Jonathan

    Hi Bert,
    thank you for your fast answer. I checked the forum again and found this post:
    Question about Statistical Forecast
    However, I don't really get how the disaggregation is meant to work; the suggestion seems to be to calculate a forecast on an aggregated level, i.e. with input and output key figure with an aggregated base planning level, and then disaggregate it "somehow".
    Do you have any idea how this disaggregation might work and what other steps I have to consider?
    It seems as if I'd have to define a whole bunch of new key figures and have more than one output key figure but no input key figure for the statistical forecast, which doesn't make sense in my eyes.
    Actually I was looking for a solution where I can define my forecasting profile with both input and output key figure on the lower planning level and then insert the level I want the forecast to be done at either in the profile as well, or even more flexible when running or scheduling a forecast. Defining more key figures any time I need another forecasting level does not appear very comfortable. Is it meant to be like that or is there another way to reach the goal mentioned above?
    Cheers,
    Jonathan
    Edit: The mentioned thread contains some valuable information on how to disaggregate key figures. However, the really tricky decision is how to define the disaggregation ratio.

  • How to define organizational levels for MM01/02/03

    Hello
    While creating/ changing/ displaying material, I'm not able to see company code as selection field in organization level.
    Can anyone please let me know from where the settings are done for this?
    Thanks
    Ankita Bansal

    Hi,
    Your Plant is assigned to company code.
    So, you can not see the Company code details in MM01/02/03.
    If you want to see for which company code your plant is attached you can see that in
    IMG>Enterprise Structure>Logistics-General--> Assign Plant to Company Code.
    Hope this helps..
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Create User-Defined Planning Layouts for Detailed Planning

    Dear All
    I would like to change layout of Tcode CJR2.
    I must copy planning layout "1-702" because I would like see:
    sender cost center definition
    sender activity type definition
    alloc. cost definition.
    what do I do?
    Thanks
    salvo50

    Eli
    I know what is already there. I would like to change layout of Tcode CJR2. I must add 3 following columns (display only) to those already there:
    1. sender Cost Center Description LTEXT (new column - display only)
    2. sender Activity Type Description LTEXT (new column - display only)
    3. sender Cost Element Description LTEXT (new column - display only)
    So my layout will appear:
    sender Cost Center KOSTL
    sender Cost Center Description LTEXT (new column - display only)
    sender Activity Type LSTAR
    sender Activity Type Description LTEXT (new column - display only)
    total quantity MEG
    sender Cost Element KSTAR
    sender Cost Element Description LTEXT (new column - display only)
    Is it possible ?
    thanks
    Salvo50

  • Planning level - Liquidity forecast

    I have done settings for liquidity forecast.  I have created planning levels, planning groups, source symbols etc.  From MM, I have included PR, PO, Sch Agreements, etc.  I have posted few PRs and POs and Vendor Masters are asigned cash management groups also.  However, while simulating the Liquidity Forecast report, system does not show PRs or POs which are posted and released.  But I can see the vendor balances posted in FI books.
    Have I missed any setting ?

    Hi Nikhita
    There is a transaction " define planning levels for logistic". In this step you allocate transaction from MM and SD to the planning levels you ahve defined.  this allocation is neccessary since the system cannot determine planning level  by using master record fields as it does to access data from FI.
    In FI planning level for G/L is specified in  G/L master.  However a business transaction in logistics is represented by an Internal ID
    1 = PR
    2 = PO
    3 = Scheduling agreement
    you must assign these transactions to a plannning level  in CM
    T-code :- Financial Supply Chain Management> Cash and Liquidity Management>Cash Management>Structuring>Define planning levels for Logistics
    Please let me know if you ahve done this setting. Would advise you to revisit your config for INT code - level- Planning group.
    Hope this helps. Please let me know if you still cant get around.
    Thanks
    Sanjeev

  • Cash Management Report FF7B - drill-down from planning levels to AP/AR OIs

    Hi
    I'm configuring cash management and have created all planning levels and groups needed.
    All master data, ie GL accounts, vendors and customers, have the correct planning level or group.
    I've created all the groupings etc that I need.
    I'm running the reports FF7A and FF7B. I have two questions and problems.
    1. When running the Liquidity Forecsat for customers and vendors I drill-down to the standard PL or SL planning levels for AP and AR postings respectively. Then I drill into the planning groups correctly  (E1-E9 and R1-R8). But when I try to drill into the cash management detail records  (or is it the AP/AR line items?) I get "Memo Records: List - List Contains No Data". This happens every time. Should I now see the AP or AP line items? Or should I see some cash management memo records? I have deleted all the cash management data several times and recreated but I still get this problem  (using reports RFFDDL00 and RFFDKU00)
    When I do the same for purchase orders, purchase requisitions or sales orders I see a Memo Records List which agrees with the previous planning level total and I can then drill into the actiual POs, PRs or SOs from this list without an issue.
    2. When running the Cash Position and I do the drill-down to the GL Line Items, I get an enormous list which does not just show the total of items at the previous planning level. Why is this please? Example: a bank account with a balance of £2,000  (shown on the panning level) but with 000's of line items totalling say £5m. Again I have deleted the CM data and recreated but without any improvement to the problem.
    Any help anyone can give me with these issues will be very much appreciated.
    Thanks.
    Wayne

    Hi
    I have the same trouble with Tcode FF7B.  There´s a message "Memo Records: List - List Contains No Data"; bit in the TcodeFF7A, it runs OK.  The message appears just witn Tcode FF7A.
    Also, There´s all TR data in tables FDSB for GL accounts, FDSR and FDFIEP for customers/vendors.
    Can you help me??  can you solved this issue?
    Tanks for your Help

  • User-Defined Planning Layouts  - Translations

    Hi Experts,
    Custom Planning layouts have been created.
    I need to translate the form from English to Danish.
    This has to be done in the Development system then moved to Quality and Production.
    This is how I proceeded with the task:
    IMG Path: Project System  Costs  Planned Costs  Manual Cost Planning in WBS  Detailed Planning  Create User-Defined Planning Layouts for Detailed Planning.
    Select Change PS Planning Cost Element/Activity Input Layouts.
    Select Layout ZMY_LAYOUT  Planning Layout  Translate Form.
    Specify Source Lanaguage : EN, Target Language: DA --> Clcik on Translate Button.
    There is a prompt for including the request in a Transport Request. If clicked yes it asks for a workbench Request.
    I specified the workbench request number.
    Select Form --> Object List
    Select the line with form name, Source Text --> Click on Translate.
    Enter the translation -> Save and exit
    However, when I check my request in SE10, it has no objects???
    If I repeat the process, and select Transport form, it asks me for a customizing Request.
    How can I move  my transations from D to Q.
    Regards,
    Reema Shahbazkar.

    Hi,
    No it is NOT a unicode system.
    Regards,
    Reema

  • How to make authorization to different planning level on one planning area?

    now the situation is one planning area call one global company, under that we create several planning level for serveral sub-company. The authorization should that one sub-comp. only can display, change his planning level, and can not display any other sub-comp. So, in this case how to make authorization? Thanks!

    I didn't create an authorization variable on sub-comp. pls, let me know how to create an authorization variable on sub-comp, and the info for the next steps. thanks!

  • Access level for Tab

    Hi,
    How can i define security level for each tab?
    i have set of users and i want a particular tab to be displayed to certain users only not to all users.
    i have already defined access privilege for the particular tab in the Advance option for tab granting privilege to specific user and also specified that this particular tab should not inherit privilege from the page, but still the tab is displayed to all the users.
    regards,
    Sunil
    null

    I also have this problem. I am using Portal 10.1.2.0.2.
    I've set up two groups (systema_users and systemb_users) and have set up two tabs, each of which should be only accessible to one of these groups. However, no matter which user I log in as, I can see both tabs regardless of which group the user belongs to. On each tab I have set access to 'Specify Access Settings' and have specified the appropriate group, with the Customize Portlets (Full) privilege, since I need them to be able to customise the content of the tab. What am I missing here?

  • KF defaulting to multiple sources, both defined at more granular planning levels

    Hello Experts,
    I hope this will be an easy one for you Personally, I have been trying to figuring out how to overcome this issue and I must admit that I am short of solution.
    So here is the situation:
    I have two sets of data for my actual sales :
    - First one is loaded at planning level @ Period | Product | National Group | Point of Sales(POS)
    - The other is loaded @ Period | Product | National Group | Ship-To Party
    To get a valid portrait of my actual sales, I must compare these two sets of data at a common planning level (i.e. @ Period | Product | National Group).
    Then, the adjusted result must be "re"disaggregated @ Period | Product | National Group | Point of Sales, the base planning level used to forecast. 
    Based on what I could understand from SAP2 model, I created the following key figures:
    ActualsQtyPOS : Stored at base planning level @PERPRODNATPOS and calculated @PERPRODNAT. Here are the 2 calculation definitions I used:
    ActualsQtyPOS@REQUEST = SUM ("ActualsQtyPOS@ERPRODNATPOS")
    ActualsQtyPOS@PERPRODNAT = SUM ("ActualsQtyPOS@ERPRODNATPOS")
    ActualsQtyShipTo : Stored at base planning level @PERPRODNATSHIPTO and calculated @PERPRODNAT. Defined with this calculation:
    ActualsQtyShipTo@REQUEST = SUM ("ActualsQtyShipTo@PERPRODNATPOS")
    ActualsQtyShipTo@PERPRODNAT = SUM ("ActualsQtyShipTo@PERPRODNATPOS")
    AdjustedActualsQty : Created at base planning level @PERPRODNAT. This KF must be stored and editable. The value must be defaulted to ActualsQtyPOS@PERPRODNAT, unless no data exist (then, default to ActualsQtyShipTo@PERPRODNAT).
    AdjustedActualsQty@REQUEST=SUM ("AdjustedActualsQty@PERPRODNAT")
    AdjustedActualsQty@PERPRODNAT=IF(ISNULL("AdjustedActualsQty@PERPRODNAT"),IF(ISNULL("ActualsQtyPOS@PERPRODNAT"),"ActualsQtyShipTo@PERPRODNAT","ActualsQtyPOS@PERPRODNAT"),"AdjustedActualsQty@PERPRODNAT").
    My issue : I tried several (and I mean several!) configuration possibilities. So far, the best result that I got was to default the good value in AdjustedActualsQty based on the calculation rule above. But my core problem persists: I am not able to edit manually the defaulting value and save the new value in the database.
    Based on my comprehension, the problem would be related to ActualsQtyPOS and ActualsQtyShipTo Key Figures. Both are stored at a more granular planning level, and then calculated @PERPRODNAT level. In addition to storing them at their base planning level, would it be possible to store the aggregated results at a higher level (@PERPRODNAT)? This way, I would be able to use them as stored input in AdjustedActualsQty@PERPRODNAT calculation and duplicate the AdjustedActualsQty KF used in SAP2.
    Any help would be greatly appreciate.
    (I tried to summarize the best I can, don't hesitate if you need more details on some points.)
    Best regards

    Hi Philippe
    you dont  need access to HANA, it is pure config
    Go to Configuration -> Miscellanious --> Manage Planning Operator
    If not existing yet, create a new type by clicking on teh white "sheet" symbole "create new" on the right side.
    In the popup enter the EXACT name COPY (not more than one possible):
    Provide info for "Add Job Procedure" and "Schedule Procedure":
    Add Job Procedure = "SAP_SFND"."sap.sop.sopfnd.catalogue::SOPAPI_OPERATOR_SCHEDULER_JOB_ADD"
    Schedule Procedure = "SAP_SFND"."sap.sop.sopfnd.catalogue::SOPAPI_EXECUTE_SCHEDULER_COPY_JOB"
    Than add you operator lines by clicking on the plus symbol
    with the following parameter:
    DURATION
    PERIOD_OFFSET
    SOURCE_KFID1
    SOURCE_KFID2
    DURATION: e.g. 24 if you want to copy 24 months
    PERIOD_OFFSET: e.g. 0 when you want to copy starting current months, or -1 if you want to start previous months
    SOURCE_KFID1: starting keyfigure FROM which you copy. MUST NOT have any UoM or currency conversion
    TARGET_KFID1: your target keyfigure. UoM or currency conversion in here is allowed
    You could have SOURCE_KFID2 and TARGET_KFID2 as well. And you can have more than just one line.
    Flag the batch and filter mode flags, but not interactive (not supported yet)
    Provide a useful DESCRIPTION as that is seen by the users
    Make sure that not too many users get the authoriozation for it as if you execute that withiout a filter accidentially it does not only change all values, but if you run more than one at a time that migt get to conflicts. Like normal batch jobs: You usually give admins or power users access
    It copies on the very lowest possible level. You cannot tell the system as in APO-DP to copy on an aggregated level. PLus, source and target kf must have the same planning level. So you may copy from a calculated kf that does the calculation on the level of the target kf
    Dont have any docu, sorry. Hope that helps
    Yours
    Irmi

  • 2 variables for same characteristic in planning level in BPS

    Hello,
    I would appreciate your help implementing this scenario: a user has access to certain versions and should be a able to copy data between 2 of those versions.
    We have 4 versions on our master data: 001, 002, 003 and 004.
    A certain user should be able to access versions 001, 002 and 003, and should not be able to access version 004.
    So we have an authorization object applied to that user with:
      -> 0TCAACTVT EQ 03
      -> 0TCAIPROV EQ <real time infocube>
      -> 0TCAVALID CP *
      -> 0VERSION EQ 001, 002 and 003
    Then, users should be able to copy data between versions.
    We created 2 variables on planning area, named ZVERSOLD and ZVERSNEW, with these characteristics:
      -> Characteristic: 0VERSION
      -> Replacement Type: USERVALUE User-defined values
      -> Restriction of Values Required by User: enabled
      -> Input Allowed by User: enabled
    So this particular user should only see those 3 versions when pressing F4 when filing both variables.
    After that, we created the planning level with the u201Ccopyu201D planning function.
    But now, on planning level, we need to restrict 0VERSION, but we have a problem because we are not able to restrict it using 2 variables (ZVERSOLD and  ZVERSNEW). Only one.
    If we donu2019t use any variable, user gets an authorization error because he is not able to access to all data due to authorizations.
    Does anyone have a way to avoid this issue? Should authorizations be defined in a different way? Should variables be defined in a different way?
    Hopefully I exposed all required details to get help, and that my question wasnu2019t too much confused.
    Again, thank you very much in advance for your support.
    Rui

    Hello,
    If you restrict the VERSION with variable ZVERSNEW for target version then the function should work. But if you get any error related to reading reference data for the source version then you can create a new variable of type exit and populate it with the values selected by the user in two variables ZVERSOLD and ZVERSNEW using the two APIs :
    API_SEMBPS_VARIABLE_GETDETAIL  - to get the current value of the two Variables
    API_SEMBPS_VARIABLE_SET - to set the Variable Values for the Exit type variable
    Regards,
    Deepti

  • Define Number Range for Manual Planning

    Dear All,
                   How Can I define number range for manual planning?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mahendra Gupta
    Moderator: Please, search before posting

    Hi,
    Please follow below path:
    SPRO>IMG>Financial Supply Chain Management>Cash & Liquidity Mgmt>Structuring>Manual Planning> Define Number Range (OT20)
    Br,Vivek

  • Billing plan (Downpayment) for saved and open sales orders at header level?

    Hi gurus,
    I have configured billing plan in my SD environment at Item Level.
    I want to change it to header level.
    Questions:
    1- When I make the changes to update the system to have billing plan at header level for future sales orders, is that possible for me to change all my saved orders and open orders with the new settings so that I can also have those saved and open orders with a billing plan at item level?
    2- If that scenario is not possible, could we for example copy the data of a previously saved or open sales order into a new sales order with the new customizing (Billing plan at Header level?)
    Thanks for your input
    Kind regards
    Chris

    Hi
    I am afraid you cannot do that converstion for the existing orders. BP at header level are enabled at teh document type level, while BP at item level is done at item category. So both are independent. Mostly it is advisabel to use BP at item level only.
    If you are already using item level BP, and want to mvoe to header BP, then only future transactions can be executed with BP at header level. Existing item level BPlans will remain so in the system.

Maybe you are looking for