Delet the settlement rule

hi
How to delet the settlement rule , after realease project.
if i check in settlement rule for Activity it will show all option in disply mode .
thanks
sunil

Has settlement from the Network Activity already ran?
On the settlement rule line ....check the values in the First Used & Last Used fields
If both of these are not blank, then settlement has already ran.
To delete you would need to undo each run of settlement to remove the date.
If in Production this is probably not an option. Therefore you will need to end the existing settlement rule with an end date in end period & year.
Then create new settlement rule.
If both First Used and Last used are blank then I would try entering /SU53 into the command field to check for missing authorisations.
I am automatically generating settlement rules from Activity to parent WBS and have no problem changing or deleting the settlement rule prior to settlement running.
Steve

Similar Messages

Mass deletion of settlement rules for few WBS- Codes

HI All,
I just want to know that is there any possible way to delete settlement rule in mass.
We use to upload the settlement rule data through LSMW program for all the project codes.By mistake the user has excuted twicw the LSMW program and now instead od having one settlement rule now they have two settlement rule assigned to the project code. thats is the second rule is duplicated.
now the user wnats to delete those second settlement rule which got duplicated for all the WBS codes. nearly there will be 6000 records are there which got affected by this.
No entries has been posted to those WBS codes till now.
Kindly any one suugest me how to proceed further to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Joby

Hi,
In customization, use the strategy with "No Receiver" and then use transaction CJB1/ CJB2 to automatically generate the revise settlement rules without receiver.
Regards,
Gaurav

User Exit for the Settle rule of a Production Order

Hello all
i got a requirement to change the settlement rule of a production order to multiple receivers.
suppose i have the following rule
Categeory | Settlement Reciever | Receiver Short text |   %   | Settlement Type | No | Source Assignment
    MAT             ZMDT89                   ZMDT88              100        FUL                 1            left as blank
now my requirement is that i have to default the source assignment as 200 (Materials) so as to allow the other reciever entered with the same settlement type as FUL and also the No should be 2
i.e. my req is like this
Categeory | Settlement Reciever | Receiver Short text |   %   | Settlement Type | No | Source Assignment
    MAT             ZMDT89                   ZMDT88              100        FUL                 1            200
    G/L             G/L A/C no                G/L shor text       100        FUL                 2            100
the bold one is i have to ADD
the T-Code is CO02.
your help is highly appreciated...
thanks in advance

hi,
check these exits in co02.
Transaction Code - CO02                     Change Production Order
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
PPCO0010                                Enhancement in make-to-order production - Unit of measure
PPCO0012                                Production Order: Display/Change Order Header Data
PPCO0013                                Change priorities of selection crit. for batch determination
PPCO0015                                Additional check for document links from BOMs
PPCO0016                                Additional check for document links from master data
PPCO0017                                Additional check for online processing of document links
PPCO0018                                Check for changes to production order header
PPCO0019                                Checks for changes to order operations
PPCO0021                                Release Control for Automatic Batch Determination
PPCO0022                                Determination of Production Memo
PPCO0023                                Checks Changes to Order Components
STATTEXT                                Modification exit for formatting status text lines
PPCO0009                                Enhancement in goods movements for prod. process order
CCOWB001                                Customer exit for modifying menu entries
COIB0001                                Customer Exit for As-Built Assignment Tool
COZF0001                                Change purchase req. for externally processed operation
COZF0002                                Change purchase req. for externally procured component
PPCO0001                                Application development: PP orders
PPCO0002                                Check exit for setting delete mark / deletion indicator
PPCO0003                                Check exit for order changes from sales order
PPCO0004                                Sort and processing exit: Mass processing orders
PPCO0005                                Storage location/backflushing when order is created
PPCO0006                                Enhancement to specify defaults for fields in order header
PPCO0007                                Exit when saving production order
PPCO0008                                Enhancement in the adding and changing of components
reward points if hlpful.

GR/IR expenses not affected with the settlement rule run process in the GL

Please neglect by previous post with the same title
There is a problem I face while running the settlement rule process related to internal orders on the GR/IR expenses.
According to the internal order settlement rule every expense associated to an Internal order no. whether its an account payable or manual journal accounts it should be settled (distributed) on the cost centers specified in each internal order after the monthly settlement run process is done through T.Code "KO8G", and this actually happens on the entries that are booked manually through T.Code "FB50", but the GR/IR entries is the biggest problem, it didn't reflect the settlement rule distributions in the GL it just gives me the original transaction once its was automatically created through T.Code "MIGO" they are only allocated to a one profit center with no cost center and without being distributed to a multiple cost centers according to the distribution strategy.
After a long search I found that the cost center distribution occurred only on a secondary none GL account named A&P Settlement (720010), all GR/IR expenses was settled correctly only on this account not through the ordinary GL accounts (e.g. Gifts, printed materials) and of course the correct distribution didn't appear in the GL,
So is there a transaction or any way to allocate the GR/IR expenses to there correct cost centers with the correct cost element in the GL?
Is there anything to do with the GR/IR calculation that depends on quantity base not value base?
The Process as follows:
(1) Creating Internal order with a settlement rule (E.g. Cost center 1 (50%) Cost center 2 (50%)
2) Creating a purchase order associated to an internal order
3) The Goods received and creating the GR transaction T.Code "MIGO"
Acc/DR Expenses accounts
Acc/CR GI/IR Account 400301
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)

4) Closing the GR/IR accounts when receiving the invoice T.Code "MIRO"
When we receive vendor invoice:
Acc/Dr GI/IR Account 400301
Acc/Cr Vendor Account
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)
5) Performing the Internal order settlement rule run process
(N.B. By entering the report of the cost center (Actual/Plan/ Variance) T.Code S_ALR_87013611
I found that GR/IR expenses was not charged on the concerned cost centers as shown in the GL )
Your Reply is highly appreciated

Thanks for your kind reply,
But is there a way solve this problem?
And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

Doubt about the settlement rule of the Production ORder

The only default distribution rule allowed for a PP order is PP1 or PP2. We would need to change that to allow settlement to multiple receivers as a default. If that is the case, we may want to look into a user exit to update the settlement rule during production order creation instead so that the G/L account is correct from the beginning.
Currently when we create the production order, the settlement rule will default the below, I am not sure if a user exit is able to maintain the Source as 200 (Materials)?
If yes, we can then add the second rule for Source 100 (Labor and Mfg) via the user exit as well.
In this case, SAP will not prompt us error of settlement with 200%, as they are from difference Sources.
now anybody can explain me about the User EXit we have to correct this

any help on this.. please its very urgent
thanks in advance

ABAP Program to delete the update rules

Hi guys,
Is there any ABAP Program to delete the update rules if any body knows.

Hi dear,
try with FM RSAU_UPDR_DELETE...
Hope it helps!
Bye,
Roberto
...and please dont forget to reward the answers...it-s THE way to say thanks here !

Change the Settlement Rule

Hi Experts,
In the settlement rule for the Process orders, the system creating the rules with the category 'OIT' (Order Item) but i want it to be changed to 'MAT' (Material) how and where do i change the same. i know that it cant be changed in Settlement rule for the Order.
thanks
Regards
Suresh

Hi rasuresh,
When I read down the the comments all the way down and back to your question, one question arise in my mind, why do you want to change the settlement rule to be MAT?
You said the your order is a Process Order, meaning that in one process order it can generate more than one out put. Please check the material master of your product via MM03 on MRP2. Check, is the co-product indicator activated? If yes, then click on tab Joint Production icon. There, in the joint production indicator showing what items will be produced during processing of the products.
By indicator Joint product, by default the receiver Item category will be set to OIT in the settlement rule. What you see in the distrubution rule receiver are the proportion of cost based on setting of joint production in the MRP view 2.
I don't think, this is as a problem. It is as what should be as a process order.
It would be different if your order is Production Order or order type PP01, then the receiver will be MAT
Hope this help you.
Best regards,
Irhasni

Changing the receiver cat in the settlement rule of Product cost collector

Hi,
I have created a Product cost collector using the Transaction - KKF6N. and observed that the settlement rule got created automatically with the CAT - MAT. I need help for below queries.
1. Is it possible to change the settlement rule for the Product cost collector?
2. If yes, Could you please let me know the procedure to do this?
3. If no, what is the alternate as I want to change the CAT from MAT to ORD.
Your help is very much appreciable and Thanks in advance for the help.

Hi,
Check in order type, Which settlement profile is maintained. Then Goto settlement profile maintain receive type which you want to settle.
Regards,
Sreekanth

KO8G-sudden surge of error mess(Maintain the settlement rule of the sender)

hi!
we encountered a lot of error message(Maintain the settlement rule), more than 4k, after we run KO8G, this is the first time happened to us. when we checked the PM orders from the error message, most of it came from previous periods even previous years, which are already closed. we can understand if there are posting for the said order for the period, but there is none. why those closed orders with no postings, still read by the settlement? were having a diffuclty of checking it one by one, we only expect less than 100. we hope you can help us.
thanks in advance
vince

Dear,
As found...
Maintain only the FROM DATE... Remove the TO DATE as 10.2010 (Extend the TO DATE)
OR
Create a new settlement rule which is valid in the Period of Execution of settlement
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Maintain the settlement rule of the sender error

Dear Friends,
Using T.code Ko88, The following data has been entered.
Order :100010R.
Settlement period - 11
processing type - automatic
Selected the Test run.
When executed, the following error is displayed " Maintain the settlement rule of the sender" Message No: Message no. KD205
Settlement rule was selected and the settlement rule was displayed.
In the distribution rules, in the category FXA and GL are defined and in Settlement, it is Full and from and to date is 10,2010.
Please suggest how to solve the error?
Regards
Sridhar

Hi
Maintain only the FROM DATE... Remove the TO DATE as 10.2010 (Extend the TO DATE)
OR
Create a new settlement rule which is valid in the Period of Execution of settlement
Br, Ajay M

Problem in maintaining the settlement rule in the maintenance order

Dear Friends,
I have a problem ,When I am trying to maintain the settlement rule in the maintenance order ,I am getting information like below
Decentralized system -> note settlement rule is not distributed
Message no. /ISDFPS/PM124
Diagnosis
You navigated to the settlement rule.
System Response
The system informs you that a settlement rule can be created but that it will not be distributed to the target system. Settlement is carried out in the target system, where the order is usually settled to the WBS element of the operation.
Can anyone throw some light on how this is happeing and remedy?
Appreciating your early response

Hello
Please check
TC --> KSR2_ORC
Please maintain the Strategy Sequences for Automatic Generation of Settlement Rule.
You define a strategy sequence for automatic generation of settlement rules for internal orders.
Regards,
Rakesh
Edited by: RAKESH ASHOK MANE on Sep 3, 2010 12:37 PM

Validation for the settlement rule of a wbs element

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement that in which i have to validate the settlement rule of the wbs done through t-code cj01/cj02/cj07,cj20n.
If the settlement receiver object is an G/L account (settlement category g/l ) then i have to check that if it is an o&m project type
wbs element settling on some already mentioned G/L e.g 0001081340,0001081341, then it should through some error like settlement rule not valid etc.
I have tried cjb1/cjb2 through badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE by creating some strategy but it did not have any option for G/L
settlement reciever. Also client will not agree to this as they want to create settlement rule manually.
I have also tried the exit 'EXIT_SAPLCOI1_027 ' but its not getting triggerred during settlement rules assign mentand also i think it will not solve my purpose.
Please help me as i am struck in this for long time now.
Warm Regards,
Hariom

Hi Prabhu ,
thanks for the quick update.
I have tried many badi's and exits but they are not triggering at the saving time of the wbs.
badi :
PROJECTDEF_UPDATE
WBS_FIELDS_FOR_ASSET
WBS_USER_FIELDS_F4
WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE
WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE
exits :
EXIT_SAPLCJWB_004
EXIT_SAPLCJWB_005
EXIT_SAPLCJWB_001
These above exits i have tried either they are not implemented or they are not triggered during saving of a wbs element.
please suggest any exit or badi's which you may have used.
Thanks and regards,
Hariom

How do I see the changes made in the settlement rule?

Dear Experts,
I would like to see the changes that was done in the settlement rule. I have perform the following:
In the 'maintain settlement rule' screen in project builder (CJ20N) - Goto > Change Document > All Rules.
The system gives message that 'no change documents found - message no KD128'.
Q: Is there any difference between settlement rule and distribution rule?
Q: Is there anywhere else that I need to do to get the change document in settlement rule or distribution rule?
FYI - I have change the project profiles to include(tick) change document in the Basic Data and Status Management. I believe this is not relevant to change in settlement rule.
I appreciate your help. Thanks.
Regards

Hi,
Abt your first question,
You need a settlement rule to carry out settlement. You define the settlement rule in the sender object. The settlement rule contains the distribution rules and the settlement parameters for a sender object.
You can maintain the settlement rule for WBS elements or networks/activities in an overview screen. You use distribution rules to stipulate which proportions of the costs are to be settled to which receiver. Costs can be distributed on the basis of:
1. Percentages
2. Equivalence numbers
3. Fixed amounts
To check changes done , you can also check t code CN60.
Regards
Tushar

Getting error in KO01 when entering the Settlement rule

Hi All,
In KO01, I am trying to create a internal order and a settlement rule. I enter settlement reciever as another Internal order of anothe co. code. Then, when i change the status to Release I get this error message
Settlement Rec. Obj. co. code is different. Pls use an object in the same co. code as this IO
Message no. DB000
This message clearly says to change the reciever to the same co. code. But, i was able to give a different internal order of anothe co. code and settle to it in SAP 4.6C
Now, in ECC 6.0, it isnt allowing but at the same time, when the settlement reciever is a cost centre of a different co. code, it doesnt error.
Can you please let me know ur thoughts on this.
Thanks
Ameet

Hi,
Can you tell me did you activate cross company settings in your client for settlement of one CO object from one company code to another.
Best Regards,
Ravi Reddy

Update was terminated received from author in sap iw32(During changing the settlement rule)

Hi,
I am getting an error "Express Document 'Update Was Terminated' Received from Author" when i am adding the settlement receiver. New settlement receiver is from period 03.2015. changed the ref object(functional location) and the tried to add the settlement receiver.
ST22 details
    Trigger Location of Runtime Error
    Program                                 SAPLCOZV
    Include                                   LCOZVU23
    Row                                       86
    Module type                           (FUNCTION)
    Module Name                        CO_ZV_CONSISTENCY_CHECK
need help.

Hi Tilak,
This is due to status inconsistency, kindly check SAP Notes, also if this is not the exact solution, raise a note to SAP.
157070 - PM/SM order:DUMP_STATUS_INCONSYSTENCY_XXXX in savng
Regards
Terence

Delet the settlement rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for