Delete authorization for specific Company Code

All,
For a specific transactions, our users may only run the transaction for a specific company code. Transaction is TPM55A
What authorization object do I need to add to my role, so the users have only authorization for let's say Company code range 1000 - 1050.
Many thanx for help
kr,
Stef

Hi Stef,
Please try to add this authorisation object manually F_BKPF_BUK- Authorisation object for company code.
In the filed BUKRS you can maintain the company code as you required for the users.
I hope this may help you in resolving the issue.
Thanks
Karthick

Similar Messages

Tax Code Mandatory in Purchase Order for specific Company Code / Country

We are doing Roll Outs of SAP into different countries.
In a particular Country / Company Code we want Tax Code to be mandatory in Purchase Order without disturbing the settings for other Country / Company Code.
Can anyone provide some idea to resolve this?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
You can create a seperate document type for that country and make it mandatory in the document specific screen varient
SPRO>MM>PUR>PO>DEFINE SCEEN LAYOUT AT DOCUMENT LEVEL>COPY NBF
Make tax code field mandatory and assign it to new document type for that country
Or user user exit or BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST
Thanks
Diwakar

PO Naming Convention for specific company code

Hi experts!
Is there any way to know this PO naming convention is belongs to which company code?
For eg: PO naming convention starts with 600*******.
How will i know which company code is using the naming convention for their purchase order?
Please help.
Thanks.
Crystal

Hi Crystal,
Naming convention is based on document type not company code :
Refer the below customsing path:
SPROMaterials ManagementPurchasingPurchase Order--Define Document Types
SPROMaterials ManagementPurchasingPurchase Order--Define Number Ranges
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Delete G/L Accounts for one company code when transaction data exists

SAP transaction OBR1 can be used to reset transaction data.
If you execute this transaction for a specific company code, the FI transaction data of that company is deleted. Because of the procedure to keep FI and CO in line, also the CO data has te be deleted.
But you can not reset CO transaction data for one company code. You have to reset CO transaction data for a whole controlling area.
If you can not delete the FI and CO transaction data for a specific G/L account in one company code, you can not delete that G/L account.
There exists another solution for the deletion of FI and CO transaction data for one company code, and thus for the deletion of G/L accounts?
Thank you very much for your feedback.
Edited by: E. Deleu on Mar 3, 2008 3:42 PM

Helllo,
I believe the account group information is what you get when loading hierarchies. Please look into the hierarchy extractor 0GL_ACCOUNT_T011_HIER.
Regards,
Christoffer

Mass deletion of document number ranges intervals for several company codes

Dear experts,
We are running version ECC6 and are about to go-live a lot of company codes simultaneously. We would like to delete satndard number ranges intervals for these company codes.
Is there a way to delete the number ranges intervals (which have not been used) for several company codes at the same time ? I'm looking for a transaction or a program similar to OBH1 (used for the creation of number ranges ).
Thanks in advance for your help.
Best Regards,
Steven

Hi
I am also not aware of such T.code to delete number ranges for a company code.
Alternatively, you can go to FBN1 in change intervals mode.
From the Menu Select all and Press Shift + F2 (Delete interval).
Ofcourse, this have to be done individually for each co. code.
Regards

How to calculate no.of records for a specific company Code and Transaction

Hi All,
Could you please help me how to calculate or count no.of records, in a table which are having a specific Company Code and Transaction Code and populate in an output table displaying that these many records are present for this company code and Transaction code.
The table is having the data like this:
LOB   TRAN CODE    COUNT
X1                             1
X1                              2
X1                              3
X1                              4
F1   NB                      5
F1   NB                     6
F1   NB                     7
F1   NB                    8
F1   NB                    9
F1   NB                    10
F1   NB                    11
F1   NB                    12
F1   NB                     13
F1   NB                     14
F1   NB                     15
F1   NB                     16
F1   NB                     17
F1   NB                     18
F1   NB                    19
F1   NB                    20
F1   NB                   21
F1   NB                   22
F1   NB                   23
F1                          24
F1                         25
F1                         26
F1                         27
    In the above table there are totally 27 records,where as the no.of records with F1 as company code and NB as transaction code are 18..so i have to display like F1 NB and 18 as one record as output.
Thanks and Regards,
Johny

You can go for Control Breaks for your requirement.
First sort the internal table by company code and transaction. Declare a counter variable.
Now loop the internal table and increment the counter variable. within the loop use AT END OF tcode.......ENDAT. Within the control break append the counter variable as well as the company code and tcode to some other ITAB and clear the counter.
This will give you the total number of records for a combination of co code and tcodes.
This will be a good reference for your requirement. What I am doing here is, for each Vendor i am calculating total number of deliveries and amounts for that vendor. For every new vendor i am writing the ouput on to a list and clearing the counter variables.
LOOP AT t_vend_prod_grp INTO fs_vend_prod_grp.
    w_total_delv = w_total_delv + 1.
    w_total_amt = w_total_amt + fs_vend_prod_grp-dmbtr.
    AT NEW matkl.
      w_mat_grp = fs_vend_prod_grp-matkl.
* To display the material group and the header texts for the data
* grouped by material group and vendor.
      SKIP 1.
      WRITE: text-mtk COLOR COL_HEADING
                              INTENSIFIED,
            / w_mat_grp COLOR COL_NORMAL
                              INTENSIFIED OFF.
      SKIP 1.
      FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING ON INTENSIFIED.
      ULINE 1(54).
      WRITE:/ sy-vline,
            2 text-ven,
           12 sy-vline,
              text-dlv,
           26 sy-vline,
           38 text-amt,
              sy-vline,
           46 text-cur,
           54 sy-vline.
      ULINE /1(54).
      FORMAT COLOR COL_HEADING OFF INTENSIFIED.
    ENDAT.                             " AT NEW MATKL
    AT END OF lifnr.
* To display the actual data for the grouping based on Material group
* and Vendor.
      FORMAT COLOR COL_NORMAL ON INTENSIFIED OFF.
      WRITE: / sy-vline,
             2 fs_vend_prod_grp-lifnr COLOR COL_KEY,
            12 sy-vline,
               w_total_delv,
            26 sy-vline,
               w_total_amt CURRENCY text-usd,
               sy-vline,
            46 text-usd,
            54 sy-vline.
      FORMAT COLOR COL_NORMAL OFF INTENSIFIED OFF.
      CLEAR: w_total_amt,
             w_total_delv.
    ENDAT.                             " AT END OF LIFNR
ENDLOOP.                             " LOOP AT T_VEND_PROD_GRP

TAX code is not working for a specific company code

Hi Friends,
One tax code is giving error messa ge that it is not maintained in tax procedure, when iam using the same code for another company code it is working fine.
Please help me, points are assured.
Thanks.
Srini

Hi Srini,
The tax codes are defined at the country level. Please check whether the company codes belong to the same country. If not ensure that the tax code is maintained in the tax procedures of the respective countries.
You can check the assignment of the tax procedure to a country in the TCode OBBG.
please reward points if helpful.
Regards,
Sreekanth....

How to restrict the user id to a specific company code?

Hi,
I want to restrict a user id to access a specific company code only for both customizing and application data creation. This means that the user id can do customizing and create application data for that company code only and not for any other company codes.
how can i do this?

Hello Raja,
You requirement of restricting users for application data can solved by adding the company code in the organization level button and the user will be restricted to mainatin application (transaction) data for the org element for which he is authorized for, if the transaction has objects which check company code.
Customizing data authorization can be very tricky, as most of the customizing transactions are for maintaining customizing tables will not necessarily have an authorization check for org elements. In this case you may to manually insert a object called S_TABU_LIN alongwith S_TABU_DIS it will perform the job of restricting authorizations.
In cases where the end user is accessing tables directly with SE16 S_TABU_DIS is the object that is check and maintained in PFCG.But,Such a restriction cannot be made with S_TABU_DIS alone. Fortunately SAP provides us with another authorization object S_TABU_LIN (Authorization for Organizational Unit), which can be used in conjunction with S_TABU_DIS to enforce such a restriction.
This authorization object works only with Maintenance Views and Customizing tables. Also note that an Organization Criterion is a prerequisite for implementing the same
A detailed step by step procedure to be followed is given below:
1. The first step in implementation of line authorization is defining an Organization Criterion. For this we need to access the u201CSAP Reference IMGu201D customization page from SPRO transaction.
2. From the IMG display screen select SAP Web Application Server -> System Administration -> Users and Authorizations -> Line Oriented Authorizations. Select the execute ( ) button for the u201CDefine Organization Criteriau201D.
3. The resulting table display show all available Org Criteria values existing in the system. For our purposes we will create a new Org Criteria to suit our needs. Select the tab u201CNew Entriesu201D as shown below.
4. Give an appropriate name starting with Y or Z for the new value. Note that a name starting with another letter will not be accepted by the SAP system. Click on u2018Saveu2019 button to save the newly created Org Criteria. This opens a new window asking for a Workbench Transport Request. This would be required so as to transport the new Line authorization restrictions further to the test and production systems.
5. Now select the new Org Criterion u201CY_TESTu201D and double-click the u201CAttributesu201D tab as below to define the various Org Attributes.
6. Provide the new Attribute name and Description for the same. Also fill the Authorization field value from the provided dropdown (1st Org Criterion Attribute u2026. 8th Org Criterion Attribute). The search help field is an optional field which can be filled if a search criterion exists or has been created earlier for the specific purpose. This field enables the u201CF4u201D when filling entries in the authorization object
7. We already have a search help (C_T001) available, which provides as an F4 help the list of all available Company Codes in the system.
Note that we can create up to 8 Org Attributes as per our requirements (by selecting u201CNew Entriesu201D tab), each corresponding to a column in the target table.
8. Selecting the attributes link again will show us a list of all defined attributes and the authorization Field it will appear in. Now that we have defined the Attribute Field that we require, we need to associate each attribute to the corresponding Table Field in the target table.
Select one of the attributes as below and double-click on the u201CTable Fieldsu201D button to define the field associations.
9. Select the u201CNew Entriesu201D tab to create a new table field association.
10. The View/table field must be filled with the target table which we need to control.
11. The u201CField Nameu201D will require the field name of the target table which be linked with the specific Org Attribute. Performing an F4 on this field will display the list of all possible fields available in the View/table provided earlier. Here we will select the field name BUKRS (Company Code). Save the entries in the same workbench request created earlier.
12. The next step would be to activate this new Org Criterion so that SAP now checks the authorization for S_TABU_LIN for every user
13. In the u2018IMG displayu2019 go to SAP Web Application Server -> System Administration -> Users and Authorizations -> Line Oriented Authorizations. Select execute ( ) button for the u201CActivate Organization Criteriau201D.
14. From the resulting customization screen tick the check-box for the Org Criterion that we have created. On saving the settings the system then asks for a Customizing Transport Request for further transport into test and development systems.
15. Any user without this authorization will not be allowed in to the SM30 display/change screen for this table.
16. In the role for which the S_TABU_DIS provides maintenance access for the table , we will now also need to maintain the object S_TABU_LIN.
17. On selecting change button besides any authorization field you will need to select the Organization criterion which needs to be maintained here. Note that only one Org Criterion can be maintained in one instance of S_TABU_LIN object.

GL code for common company code

Hi
Please suggest the solution in following situation:-
Situation:- we have 10 company code with common chart of account. first we have created one company code (say 1000) and rest we have created with reference to first company code (say 1000). thru this process, all relevant data get copied in all company codes.
Problem:- Some of the GL code is company specific like bank and tax GL. The movement we are creating GL code for first company code (say 1000), it is automatically available in all company code created with reference to first company code.
Expected solution:- how can we avoid the same. one solution we have which is mark for deletion for unwanted GL. But mark for deletion GL also appear in F4 selection list which is creating confusion for user.
Please suggest the possible changes.
Regards
DD

hi,
after coping GLs from company code 1 to Com cod 2,please delete the unwanted GLs from CC 2 with transaction code OBR2.
at company code level only you have to delete those GLs
thanks in advance...
Srinu

Delete vendor based on Company code

Hi all,
I am working in EBP 3.5 with SAP R/3 4.7 version in classic scenario.
I am looking for deletion of vendors based on specific company code in EBP system.
Pointers or solutions will be highly appreciated and awarded.
Regards
Dinesh singh

Hi Dinesh,
In SRm, there is no link between Vendor and company code as it is in R/3.
You will have to read backend vendor file to know which vendor is assigned to which company codes.
But whatever your check in the backend, SRM vendor does not have to be deleted as there is no assignment to company code in EBP....
Vendors are assigned in SRM to Purchasing organization.
Kind regards,
Yann
Message was edited by: Yann Bouillut

One vendor for two company codes

Hi Frds,
I have two company codes and i create a vendor which is applicable to both the company code.Is it required for me to create separate Payable reconciliation GL account for each company codes or creation of one common recco account is enuf.
Please elaborate on this as am new to this..
Thanks,
Rashmi Ravi

Dear all,
SAP allows You to create a customer / vendor master data that contains information that is valid for all the Company code --> into General data.
Then there is a part, Company Code data, where You can define specific details for each Company Code.
The transaction is the same FD01 or FK01.
I hope this helps You.
Mauri

Authorization for specific business scenario or business step in solar01

Dear all,
we have an issue regarding solution manager blueprinting management restricting an access to specific nodes. Our goar is to have several substructures devided by modules like: FI, SD, PS and etc. And each team member according his position in a company should have an access only to his substructure and all the related documentation below that. Saying an access means a change mode not a display access.
Please find the steps have been performed during the configuration of project below:
All the configuration around system landscape has been done properly.
A new project for solution was created in solar_project_admin.
A correct logical componens has been assigned.
All the required users have assigned as a team members of a project.
At the projec. team member tab a box has been checked in for: restrict changes to nodes in project to assigned team members.
A proposed structure of nodes has been created within Tx solar02.
The right team members have assigned to specific node. So that only they suppose to have a change permission within that nodes. All others read only access.
Every user has sap_solar01_all role assigned to him. We have tryed assigning varios roles according to http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm310/helpdata/en/db/a1033b2a98f46ae10000000a11402f/content.htm
However as a result we are having a change permission allowed for every node within the structure. Like FI responsible member can access to any node from a tree. And he can make a change for SD related documentation.
Please assist regarding this issue.
Kind regards,
P.S.
I found a thread with a similar problem which was solved by activating a checkbox which is already activated in our system and actually doesn't solve that problem for us.
Authorization for specific business scenarios in Solar01/02
Edited by: Artjoms Nikulins on Mar 11, 2010 3:37 PM

Hi
As far my knowldege goes this is not possible to do within same project or making the same.
You can have project specific access given to member but you cannot go module wise authorization.
Ofcourse there satellite system authorization will be different but not in solman.
In addition check this security guide
https://websmp104.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=00200797470000075728&_OBJECT=011000358700007187872005E
Hope it ans ur query.
Regards
Prakhar
Edited by: Prakhar Saxena on Mar 12, 2010 3:22 AM

Digital Signatures for mutliple company code

Hi,
Our client have multiple company codes & they want to use digital signature for all the company code and there be individual authorised digital signatory for each comp code.
Now the question is , whether we have procure different digital signature for individual company codes & if so how system will identifies which authorised ditigatl signature should be assigned to respective company code...?
=> We are not able to download Adobe Form local & aslo is it mandatory to have digital signature to download Form 16 on a local system.
System details : ECC 6
SP Level : 38
Thanks & Regrads,

Digital Signature is person specific
You have to take the Digital signature ( A number assigned for each signatory with the tool),from an authorized services provided by NSDL
In a single company code if you have 2/3 signatories , first you need to make groups based on the signing authorities, in combination of PA/PSA/EG/ESG/BA etc
The form 16 is to be generated on the above criteria applicable.
3 file of form16 will be generated and send accross to 3 signing authorities
The signing authority can open the form using the tool ,digitial signatory software install and can authenticate the form16.
As per NSDL form16 is now not an statuory doucment. Its just an Tax Information of an Employee.
which is not required to be attached with your ITR's also
So why do you require the Digital signature to be printed on the form16 . Pls check this up with your finance team
Thansk & Regards
Hemant V. Mahale

MIRO - deactivate direct posting to GL / material acct for selected company codes

Hi All,
I have a requirement to deactive direct posting to G/L and material accounts in MIRO, however, only for selected company codes (this cannot be done for all of them on client level in SPRO->Material Management->Logistic Invoice verification->Incoming Invoice -> Activate direct posting to GL/ Material accounts).
The thing is that for those company codes, MIRO posting has to be made always with Purchase Order Reference.
My idea is to build simple validation rule:
if company code is equal to (SET) and Purchase Order Reference is empty then error message should appear: "Posting without PO reference not allowed"
I was also thinking on creating own layout in MIRO and assign it to clerks which are responsible for posting in those company codes.
Can you advise on that, please?
Best regards,
Lukasz

Hi Tejas,
Thanks for your reply.
Answering your questions:
1. The thing is that these GLs are being posted with other transactions.
2. My concern is that after the document is parked and while editing user will delete PO reference, it can be any GL account picked in "GL tab" of MIRO transaction. My understanding is that I should put tick on "Post automatically only" on all the GL accounts which users are able to use (correctly or not) in that case.
My aim in this configuration is to restrict those posting in such way that users are not allowed to use them - and this is only in regards to MIRO transaction.

Different number range for recurring docs for diff company code

Hi,
We define X1 as the number range for recurring company codes. For 2 company codes, we have given the same number range for X1, 100000-1999999
Now when a recurring doc is posted for both the company codes monthly, the company codes have same dco number which confuses the user.
Is there any way to change the set up of the number range like deleting the one existing and starting with the new series
Any other suggestions are appreciated
-Vaibhav

Hello,
You cannot deleted the number range if it has already been posted, however, you just limit or restrict the upper limit equal to the current number.
Create a new number for other company code.
the number ranges are defined at company code level / fiscal year level.
The number ranges can be year dependent or year independent
They may be internal or external.
Regards,
Ravi

Delete authorization for specific Company Code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for