Delete Distribution Rule Group

Hi,
I am wroking on one problem address to me. User haas created 999 distribution rule group for AUC settlement...and getting error message KD803.... Maximum distribution rule group reached.(T code AIAB)..  we have implemented note 720619 and 483600 to delete unused distribution rule group....  but I am still not able to delete the same....as I found in programme (Z_SAP_SRULE_DEl_DISTR_GROUPS)  it is not supporting assets rule group....
can you please suggest some other way how to delete Dist. rule group..... for testing I need to post 999 Dist. rule group.... also suggest fastest way ...to create the same....
Regards,
Tushar
Edited by: Tushar Dave on Jun 13, 2008 2:51 PM
Edited by: Tushar Dave on Jul 31, 2008 11:11 AM

Transffered all the values from AUC to new AUC and create new Distribution rule group for new AUC to capitalised values.

Similar Messages

  • Create internal order with reference - Do not copy distribution rule group

    Hi,
    I'm creating an internal order with reference to another order through tcode KO01. When i will display the new internal order, i already have distribuion rule group that was copied from the reference order. To delete the incorrect distribution rule group i execute tcode KO02, however this information do not appear in tcode KO02.
    What should be done to delete this settlement rule? I do not want to copy the settlement rules from the old internal order.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ana Fernandes

    Hi.
    'What should be done in order to do not copy this information when i create the internal order with reference?'
    in tcode kot2_opa do not maintain Settlement profile for Order category 3
    Also go to KOM2 and delete Settlement rule for order, from which you copying.
    'in table COBRB i can see the information however i can not delete it. The validy period is empty.'-in su53 check authority

  • Delete Distribution Rules For AUC

    Hi,
    I am wroking on one problem address to me. User haas created 999 distribution rule group for AUC settlement...and getting error message KD803.... Maximum distribution rule group reached.(T code AIAB).. we have implemented note 720619 and 483600 to delete unused distribution rule group.... but I am still not able to delete the same....as I found in programme (Z_SAP_SRULE_DEl_DISTR_GROUPS) it is not supporting assets rule group....
    can you please suggest some other way how to delete Dist. rule group.....
    Regards,

    Hello
    If any un used rules are there then only the said programme deleted the rule, if 999 rules are used then it is better to look for other options   like transfer the values to another Internal order
    Thanks
    Kameshwar Rao

  • How to create distribution rules group for wbs settlement rules

    Hi,
    How can I create distribution rules group for WBS element settlement rules ?
    For some WBS elements I can see(in view mode(cj03)) distribution groups in settlement rules screen but when I try to edit settlement rules I only see default group.
    How can i create/edit those groups ?
    Regards,
    Rafał

    Self answered:
    CJIC t-code

  • Deletion of distribution rule group

    Hi
    i have created distribution rule group1 with 760 AUC to be settled.But i want it to be deleted.Please provide the steps to be followed.
    Thanks
    shivaji

    Pls you have posted in wrong forum

  • AIAB- maximum number of distribution rule gruops has been reached

    Hi experts,
    I am getting the error u201CMaximum no. of distribution rule group has been reachedu201D, while running Transction code - AIAB for distribute asset for the asset capitalization from AuC.
    Anybody facing this type of error earlier if yes how to resolved
    thanks
    gkumar

    The objects reached to 999 hence system is throwing error.
    So you can delete some of them if not required and create a new one. Check below
    On the basis of your entries in the settlement rules, the system automatically determines the processing sequence for the settlement objects so that you can settle all objects completely. Each object is given a hierarchy number between 0 and 999. The object with the highest number is settled first and the object with the lowest number is settled last.
    For example, repair or maintenance orders have hierarchy number 100. Orders for a turbine or cooling have hierarchy number 050, and the order for your power station has hierarchy number 000. Therefore, the system first settles the repair- or
    maintenance costs to the turbine or cooling, and then settles these orders to the power station.

  • Distribution Rule in Incoming Payment of Invoice

    Hello Experts,
    I'm running SAP B1 8.81 PL05 and I have the following problem.
    I issue an A/R Invoice + Payment  and I have in the "Payment Means" a discount. The final result is an issue of two different journal entries - one for the invoice and another for the payment discount.
    The problem is that I want to have a Distribution Rule associated with the Incoming Payment discount and I can't find a way to associate it - the solution of associating a distribution rule to the account is not possible because the Distribution Rule changes according to the sales employee.
    Help would be very appreciated.

    Hi Thomas,
    From the SAP help, you can know what is the use of this rule.
    Defining Distribution Rules
    Use
    For cost accounting, this setting is mandatory.
    Use this procedure to define distribution rules to distribute amounts between different profit centers.
    Prerequisites
    You have defined profit centers.
    Note: If you delete a distribution rule for one profit center (100%) this does not automatically delete the profit center.
    You can also look up this key word to find more info. For examle, you can find SAP note 1236348 to see if it fits you.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Distribution rules in Incoming payment and Outgoing payment

    Hi,
    Did anyone know the purpose of having distribution rules in all the outstanding invoices in both Incoming and Outgoing payment.
    I try to attach the distribution rules to specific invoice and post incoming payment but it did not appear in the bank journal entry row.
    I also try to attach profit center in AR Invoice row but after posting and do Incoming payment, the distribution rules also never show for that particular invoice.
    Really wonder how the distribution rule works?
    Regards
    Thomas

    Hi Thomas,
    From the SAP help, you can know what is the use of this rule.
    Defining Distribution Rules
    Use
    For cost accounting, this setting is mandatory.
    Use this procedure to define distribution rules to distribute amounts between different profit centers.
    Prerequisites
    You have defined profit centers.
    Note: If you delete a distribution rule for one profit center (100%) this does not automatically delete the profit center.
    You can also look up this key word to find more info. For examle, you can find SAP note 1236348 to see if it fits you.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Distribution rules for Settlement Profile

    Hi
    I have setup a PM Orders which collect all the maintenance and running cost of vehicles (equipments).  I have assigned settlement Profile "Internal Order" with settlement rule "Mandatory for release".
    Now when I click settlement rule button in work order, there are two distribution rules PER and FUL both 100% and to same cost centre (which belongs to equipment).
    Is this normal to have two distribution rules? will it cause any issues? where can I go to setup distribution rule to just one e.g FUL 100 (just one line), if I have to.
    Thanks in Advance.

    hi..
    1. This is SAto creat two dis rule by default.
    2. This will not creat any problem in settlement.
    Basic concept is :
         A)  Maintenance Order settlement rule having 2 lines that is Per & Ful. Peroidic Settlement- in this settlement rule system settle whatever cost occurs upto today & suppose in future if you want to charge some more cost on the same Maint. Order then system will accept it. And when ful or Final settlement runs the rest of the cost will settle to the cost receiver.
         B) You need not to delete any line whether this is PER or FUL.Its depends upon the settlement job which is done manually or schedule batch job. Suppose you has created schedule batch job for PER and FUL both. And the schedule frequency of PER is weekly and schedule frequency of FUL is monthly.
    I think this will give you some light on this issue.
    kkumar

  • How to delete the rule in transformation

    Hi all ,
    I have remodeled the info-cube and added one characteristics ZRMACTTRS.  This characteristics got updated in transformation rule..Now i want to delete it from transformation but i am unable to do so ..
    I tried  deleting  the rule and message was populated "one rule is successfully deleted  " but yet it is not removed from transformation structure (this rule has a key,can i remove key from rule ?).
    I have tried to remove the characteristics through remodeling but delete characteristics request is not getting active...
    Please help

    yoiu can try by putting the rule to 'initial' (in rule details)...ignore the subsequent warning and delete the arrow with a right-click. Then activate your rule again...maybe this will work.
    M.

  • How do I delete a contact group from my iphone

    How do I delete a contact group from my iphone?

    Download Easy Group. It is totally free. Lauch it. Click on Edit. Click on red-cross next to your unwanted group. That's all. http://itunes.apple.com/fr/app/easy-group/id461469079?mt=8
    Rémi
    Note: As I am Easy Group developper, I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise,from my recommendation or link.

  • Adding data to Manual Distribution Rule from DIAPI

    Hi
    I am searching for the object to insert the data to OMDR (manual distribution rule) using DI API. Can any one help me out.
    I found many questions related to adding data to manual distribution rule using DIAPI which were not answered.
    Thanks in Advance.

    hi.
    Just check the below posts.
    object type of distribution rules
    Distribution rules setup..

  • Changing the automatic Distribution Rule from Per to Full

    Hello SAPians,
    I have a scenario where the Customer is maintaining the Moving Average Price (I know this is not SAP suggested, I am in the process of convincing to move from moving avg to Std) for the Semi-finished goods and finished goods.
    It is Product Cost by Order scenario where Process Orders are using and the settlement rule to the Material and distribution rule is "Per" (Periodic). The main reason Customer had this Per was they would not be able to settle the Order once they settle it in full.
    But due to increased issues in month end atctivities due to thie 'Per' settlement (settlement of Process Orders not settling properly in the last month due to the failure of Batch jobs and other reasons). I want to suggest them to use Distribution Rule 'Full' instead of 'Per' because of the following advantages considering the above scenario.
    1. The 'Full' settlement can be settled if the Order is not in Teco or closed status any number of times as long as there is the Variance sitting on the Order.
    2. The 'Full' Distribution rule will not create issue if the variance is sitting on the Order in the closed period because when you do the settlement in the next period, system will allocate the variances from the last period to the Material Receiver in the current Period(I have not yet tested this scenario) and has not been. (Yeah I know there will be issue if the Material has been moved out of inventory before the settlement happens, they have another set up to update the Material prices manually by keeping the track of cost of Material).
    3. So the config change will be the Product cost by Order -> Manufacturing Order-> Define Cost-Accounting-Relevant Default Values for Order Typ --> change the Default rule from PP1 to PP2 'Process orders (periodic settlement)'
    Please let me know if what I am thinking is wrong based on this sceanrio and also please give me some more insight if I am missing any points.
    Thank you very much for your time!
    -Harter.

    Hi Balaji/Ajay,
    Could you please help me in understanding the effect of Variances if I change the Order type to FULL in this scenario (Moving Average price for Finished good Material)?
    I checked the configuration and the Variance is only Total Variance that is settling to FI and COPA.
    Also client is more concentrated on Variance accumulated per year and not per month.
    Let's say I have Order in Period 9 where the actual debits on the Order are $1000 and actual credits are $1200 where balance (variance) is $200 and suppose I missed the Period 9 settlement and I want to settle this Order in Period 10 where I had $100 variance in that Period 10
    Period         Variance on Order                Status
    9              $200                   missed
    10              $100                   not yet
    So now when I settle the Order in period 10 (with FULL as settlement type), it settles $300 instead of $100 variance. So if this is the case, if I look at the Variance data, yes the variance data is wrong but if I look at yearly perspective, it looks right but I think I am missing something here, right?
    Also what happens if the Order is open more than one year and the same scenario happens, the Variance will be posted to new year which is again issue, right?
    Am I in the right direction?
    Please advice.
    Thank you,
    -Harter.

  • Profit Center & Distribution Rule - figures not shown in P&L

    hi experts,
    I have created a distribution rule which consists of 5 profit centers as following:
    Sales1 20%
    Sales2 20%
    Sales3 20%
    Sales4 20%
    Sales5 20%
    I posted a JE with amount of 2000 to one of my expense accounts with distribution rule tagged in row level.
    Run:
    P&L statement with profit center Sales1 is selected (expected result: expense account 400)
    Result:
    Empty~NOTHING. (I believe 400 should be showing in my P&L right?)
    Please advice on the statement above and PLEASE do not ask me to read previous threads as I had gone through them.

    Hi,
    The note 843508 explains the behaviour.
    Hope it helps.
    Jesper

  • How to delete hundred of groups in icloud ?

    How to delete hundred of groups in icloud ?

    You will have to click each group and tap the delete key.  Unless you link your iCloud to a Mac where you may have different options in the Address Book or Contacts App, thats the only way.
    Source: http://help.apple.com/icloud/#/mmfba73312

Maybe you are looking for

  • What do i need to completely fix my ipad?

    Guys, Let's be honest: As much as I love Steve Jobs and his company as a whole, why is it so difficult to fix these devices? I mean yes it is a cool piece of technology but it has its flaws that, when dropped or otherwise broken, FAR outweigh the ben

  • Bulk collect statement is not working

    Hi I am executing the following scripts declare           Type r_info is record      name varchar2(1000),      value varchar2(1000),      TL varchar2(100),      id varchar2(100)      Type t_info is table of r_info;      l_info t_info; begin          

  • Navigate to Universal work list in portal (UWL)

    Hi Experts, I need to navigate to the UWL from my component on click of a button. For this should we just call the URL (hardcoded) on the button event or should we navigate to the Iview in which the UWL is embeded. Please advice. Thanks in Advance, C

  • Nokia Lumia 1320 does not recognize media files properly

    Hello I have the following problem with my Nokia Lumia 1320: media files (either music or video) are not recognized properly and therefore seen in "other" section of Storage. There has been a discussion here a while ago here: https://social.msdn.micr

  • Problems downloading Dreamweaver

    I have been attempting to download the trial version of Dreamweaver CS4. After finding the version and OS, and selecting DOWNLOAD, a pop-up appears that tells me I need to install the ADOBE DOWNLOAD MANAGER first. Problem is, there are MANY MANY MANY