Delete Distribution Rules For AUC

Hi,
I am wroking on one problem address to me. User haas created 999 distribution rule group for AUC settlement...and getting error message KD803.... Maximum distribution rule group reached.(T code AIAB).. we have implemented note 720619 and 483600 to delete unused distribution rule group.... but I am still not able to delete the same....as I found in programme (Z_SAP_SRULE_DEl_DISTR_GROUPS) it is not supporting assets rule group....
can you please suggest some other way how to delete Dist. rule group.....
Regards,

Hello
If any un used rules are there then only the said programme deleted the rule, if 999 rules are used then it is better to look for other options like transfer the values to another Internal order
Thanks
Kameshwar Rao

Similar Messages

Got error "Enter distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit"

Hi
I need to make AUC settlement to GL account using t.code AIAB. I have maintained the settlement rule but when I click on check button I got message " Enter distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit". The error msg no. KD059.
Thanks in advance.

Please do the
following. , instead of assigning cost center, assign fixed asset(any asset)
Then go back and click on detach then create your normal rule again at the same
line
The rule is that AUC should have at least one settlements rule for fixed asset
even if it not used

Projects Release - Error: Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without val

Hi Experts ,
While Releasing Projects , we got error :
Enter a Distribution Rule for Asset without a Validity limit.
Message No : KD059.
Diagnosis:
The settelement Profile used requires you to define a distribution rule for asset . For period 005 , 2009 , however not created a distribution rule for Asset.
We gave checked Settelement Profile , still we are not clear what settings is causes for this error ,
Please throw some light on if some one come across ...
Regards,
Sujana

check out OSS note 115618

Settlement rule for AUC

Dear SAP gurus,
In AIAB, I have assigned the settlement rule for AUC asset id. However I am not able to see the settlement rule assigned in As03. Is there any report

Hi,
you can see the settlement rule only in AIAB.
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Jun 15, 2010 12:52 PM

Automatic settlement rules for AUC

Hi.
I want to create the automatic settlement rules for AUC settlement instead of entering the setllement rules manually.
can anyone provide me the configuration steps required for automatic settlement rules.
Regards,
Padmavathi

Hi ,
Path: Spro - controlling - Internal orders - Actual postings - Settlement - Automatic generation of settlement rules
Can anyone please provide me the details how to configure in this path and in which scenario is it useful.
Regards,
Padmavathi

In the tranformation i have deleted a rule for an info object material?

Hi all,
In the transformation i have deleted a rule for an info object material and then moved into quality. The number of columns is 10 after the material is excluded.
And the same transport moveed to production with warning messages.
the number of columns is 11 and it is not 10 when i check in the quality!!
Can anyone help me on this!!
thanks
Pooja

Hi,
As you said you removed the rule in transformation for an object (attribute) in matreila master data object.
Number of column/attrbute will remain same when you will see data in master data object (material). It is just the mapping from source is removed so you will not see any data in that attribute/column for whihc you have removed the rule/transformation.
For removing column you need to remove attribute/Info Object from Master data object (Material) attribute list.
I hope it will help.
Thanks,
S

Delete Distribution Rule Group

Hi,
I am wroking on one problem address to me. User haas created 999 distribution rule group for AUC settlement...and getting error message KD803.... Maximum distribution rule group reached.(T code AIAB).. we have implemented note 720619 and 483600 to delete unused distribution rule group.... but I am still not able to delete the same....as I found in programme (Z_SAP_SRULE_DEl_DISTR_GROUPS) it is not supporting assets rule group....
can you please suggest some other way how to delete Dist. rule group..... for testing I need to post 999 Dist. rule group.... also suggest fastest way ...to create the same....
Regards,
Tushar
Edited by: Tushar Dave on Jun 13, 2008 2:51 PM
Edited by: Tushar Dave on Jul 31, 2008 11:11 AM

Transffered all the values from AUC to new AUC and create new Distribution rule group for new AUC to capitalised values.

AIAB Distribution Rule for Settlement Error, "Asset cannot settle to itself"

Hello Everyone,
I have a customer who is getting the "asset cannot settle to itself" error when trying to set up a distribution rule to settle the remaining items of a Line Item Managed AUC to multiple Assets. The Asset numbers and AUC number do NOT match. Here are the steps that have been followed.
Created an Internal Order, #2000####. (1998)
Created the AuC asset. #600####(2011)
Created Settlement Rule (Sender – Internal Order, Receiver - AUC) (2011
Settle Internal Order to AUC.
Create Assets. (2014). #900###1 - #900##99 etc.
Create Settlement Rule (Sender – AUC, Receiver – Multiple Assets) This is where my customer gets the error.
They were able to settle other items from this AuC to Assets last October. It seems very strange to me that the Internal Order was created in 1998 and the AUC was created in 2011 but as I said, this was working at least last October and possibly in March of this year.
Thanks for you help.
Rick

Hello Stacy,
Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but I just had a major implementation go live on the 2nd so I've been rather busy. I opened a ticket with SAP on this and this is what was found.
Joachim from SAP Support explained that the AUC had been settled to itself last year, that is the posting the program was throwing the error on. My assumption is that we were able to settle AUC's to themselves prior to our March upgrade. This explains the problem and we have a resolution. We are transferring AUCs that this has happened with to a new AUC and then settling the new AUC as usual.
I believe SAP fixed a bug that had previously allowed AUC's to settle to themselves in one of the updates but because this AUC had a record from the past where it settled to itself the program was validating old line items and that is why it throws the error.
Ramnik's suggestion was another option but we didn't want to change the message to a warning because we didn't want anyone to settle an asset to itself.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Rick

Distribution rules for Settlement Profile

Hi
I have setup a PM Orders which collect all the maintenance and running cost of vehicles (equipments). I have assigned settlement Profile "Internal Order" with settlement rule "Mandatory for release".
Now when I click settlement rule button in work order, there are two distribution rules PER and FUL both 100% and to same cost centre (which belongs to equipment).
Is this normal to have two distribution rules? will it cause any issues? where can I go to setup distribution rule to just one e.g FUL 100 (just one line), if I have to.
Thanks in Advance.

hi..
1. This is SAto creat two dis rule by default.
2. This will not creat any problem in settlement.
Basic concept is :
A) Maintenance Order settlement rule having 2 lines that is Per & Ful. Peroidic Settlement- in this settlement rule system settle whatever cost occurs upto today & suppose in future if you want to charge some more cost on the same Maint. Order then system will accept it. And when ful or Final settlement runs the rest of the cost will settle to the cost receiver.
B) You need not to delete any line whether this is PER or FUL.Its depends upon the settlement job which is done manually or schedule batch job. Suppose you has created schedule batch job for PER and FUL both. And the schedule frequency of PER is weekly and schedule frequency of FUL is monthly.
I think this will give you some light on this issue.
kkumar

Itu00B4s possible to change the Distribution rules for a order type RM01 ??

Hi Experts:
I need to change the settlement rule which is automatic created at the moment that you create a Cost colector (class order RM01) transaction KKF6N..
but when I go into KKF6N transaction and I select the "change" option and after that I go into settlement rule screen, I can´t change the distribution rule.
I would need to change the settlement type from "PER" value to "TOT" value.. It´is possible in this kind of Cost colectors??
Thanks and regards!
Manuel

Hi,
Please note that you will not be able to change manually the settlement rule for a cost collector.
When you save, the system creates a settlement rule for the product cost collector.
The settlement rule for the product cost collector always specifies the distribution rule "100% to material" and the settlement type is always PER (periodic).
Also refer the note 388457 in which one of the paragraph it says "As of Release 4.5, a special settlement rule is generated when you create a product cost collector (with procedure 5: delivery value for product cost collector). You cannot subsequently change this settlement rule".
regards
Waman

Screen layout rules for Auc

Hi
one my clint in development screen layout rule has been defined and where as the same has been moved to production but if using the T. co OAYZ it is not maintained , exit screen is appearing , how change or create the screen layout for AUC in production
pls help
regrds
sekar

sekar,
The oayz screen is a customizing transaction and normal you are no alowed to make customizing changes in production.
When you don't have the values you set up in development and transported to production you have to look to the error in the transport system.
When you use invesment orders or project, then this setting/ changes (for AUC) are only working for new orders or projects.
In OAYZ you give only default values and activate a depreciation area. This values are proposed when you create new AUC.
Paul

Error while attaching settlement rule for AuC asset

Getting error "The share to be settled in rule 001 is not unique" "Enter a unique number (001) (view: Actual settlement) " when trying to attach a settlement receiver in transaction AIAB - where to view the duplication of rules, and where to delete the rules ?

Hello
Check the transfer variant / receiving asset / transaction type.
Check all rules again.
Reg

Settlement rule for AUC not automatically generated

Hi Experts,
I am working on a capital project scenario where I have configured the investment profile and assigned this to the project profile. I have also configured the settlement profile and allocation structure for settlement to FXA.
On release of the WBS element the AUC is automatically created.
I have posted costs to the WBS element.
When I run settlement in test mode, using CJ88 the details show the sender as the WBS element and the reciever as the AUC, and the amount = the cost posted to the WBS element in the posting period, (as expected)
However, (now my problem)
When I run settlement in "update" mode the settlement shows 1 settlement however when I drill down to see the sender or reciever details are blank. There are alno no accouting documents and a settlement rule does not display for the WBS element. There are no error messages even though the settlement has not taken effect.
Please can anyone advise on the possible cause of this error. One further point the document type on the settlement profile is configured as "SA" GL Account Document.
Thanks in advance.
Ian

hi,
Go to Settlement rule (CJ02),where enter the WBS .here go to Extra in the menu bar of that WBS ,under Asset under construction ckeck the box of Historiy....something like that .
Regards
Ricky

Deleting derivation rule for the existing characteristic in operating conce

Hi all
My customer has two characteristics" Billing Doc(VBELN)" and" Warranty status" in the development and testing client and not in the production now.
Option 1 : Is to delete them but as the data is already posted for the same in the test and development client,it is lot more complex( involves implementation of OSS notes-SAPNET note 21207) .
Option 2: If we decide to keep them for now:These two have a derivation rules too. So can we simply delete the derivation rules so that data will not get posted to them( So will not effect the PSG i.e ce4xxxx table in production once the same transport is moved to production). There are no dependencies on this derivation rule.
Option 3: Can we also remove them from segment level characteristics?
Please let me know pros and cons ?
I really appreciate your time and effort.
Thanks & Regards
Sri

Hi,
If the characteristics have not been transported to production then why don't you delete them in the dev/test system ? Here you can take the risk.
To delete characteristics or value fields, perform the following
activities:
1. Delete the corresponding characteristics and value fields from Customizing in all clients (this includes forms, reports, planning
layouts, and so forth). To locate characteristics and value fields, use the appropriate where-used list in the Customizing Monitor. You can access it by choosing Tools -> Analysis -> Check Customizing Settings (TA KECM).
You can jump directly from the where-used list to the relevant Customizing transaction and then delete the appropriate field there.
2. Switch to the screen for maintaining the data structure of an operating concern (Maintain operating concern).
3. If you need to effect other changes to the datastucture for the operating concern before making any deletions, effect those changes and save the data structure.
4. In order to be able to select the fields of the data structure, choose Extras -> Characteristics (or Value fields) -> Unlock.
5. Select the characteristics and value fields to be deleted and remove them from the data structure with the "Reset fields" function.
6. Reactivate the operating concern. The system starts by checking whether the operating concern contains any data and whether the fields to be deleted are still being used in any Customizing settings.
7. If none of the fields are still in use, the system then starts the re-activation. If the operating concern does not contain any data or does not require the database system to be converted, the tables are activated. You are then able to activate the environment for the operating concern. In this case, the following activities no longer apply.
If the operating concern already contains data, a system message tells you that the database needs to be converted. If you proceed, an activation log appears (at the top of the list).
8. Analyze the activation log. If it only contains error messages telling you to convert the tables, proceed with the next activity.
You must otherwise remove the cause of the errors before the tables can be converted. In this case, you should answer "No" to the next prompt, which asks whether the conversion transaction should start.
9. If you still only receive error messages telling you to convert the tables, choose "Back" and start the conversion.
10. Plan a job for the conversion. A list of the tables to be converted is shown for this. If the tables only contain a small amount of data (less than 10 000 records), then all the tables can be converted in one job. In that case, you can select all the tables.
For larger tables, conversion should take place in several jobs.
However, you should ensure that table CE4xxxx (where xxxx = operating concern) is the last table to be converted.
Warning. No other changes can be made to the operating concern during the conversion.
A copy of the table is generated during the conversion. The database system should have sufficient memory available for this copy.
To schedule conversion as a job, use the "Schedule selections" function.
You can display the current status of the conversion by selecting the "Refresh" icon. Tables disappear from the list once they have been converted sucessfully. If a conversion is taking a while, it is also possible to leave the transaction. You can then continue the conversion using DB requests -> Mass processing in one of the following ways:
With the job overview. You access this by choosing System -> Services ->Jobs.
Using the database utility transaction. You access this by choosing Utilities -> Database Utility in the ABAP Dictionary menu.
You can use the status function to call up the status of the operating concern during operating concern maintenance. You need to activate all tables after conversion.
11. To analyze errors that have occurred during the conversion, you can use the database utility transaction by choosing Extras -> Logs. The log has the same name as the conversion job: TBATG-date. You can also restart the conversion with this transaction.
For more information on the database utility, choose Help -> Application help while still in the above transaction.
12. Once you have activated all the tables in the operating concern, generate the operating concern environment from within operating concern maintenance.
You can then use the operating concern again.
Please, refer to the IMG documentation under Controlling ->Profitability Analysis -> Structures -> Define operating concern
-> Maintain operating concern, for further details.
regards
Waman

Maintain settlement rule for AUC

I am getting following error in T.code AIAB. 'You have chosen a depreciation area, which does not carry the depreciation data from table COEPBR.'
Anyinputs to resolve would be appreciated.
Thanks in anticipation.
Regards,
Prasad

HI,
Assign depreciation key 000 (no dep) for Asset Under Construction - Asset Class.
Regards,
satish

Delete Distribution Rules For AUC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for