Deleted Users Confusion/Worry

I'm not very tech smart but I just opened my finder to look through my computer and on the left side bar, favourites/devices area. I found a 'Deleted Users' file which i've never seen before. I'm confused how they got here and why I never saw it before.
It has two .dmg and one is 'aspnet.dmg' I don't know what that even is?
The other seems to be my older personal user account, lets just say its called 'M.dmg' which I again don't know how it got there. I did transfer my old computer on to this but i don't remember deleting it on my mac or anything about it ending up in this Deleted Users folder.
The user I use on my mac is the first one I made, the user I currently use is called 'M2' so its not the same one I'm using but I'm just worried what these things are and how they got there. They both apparently have 1gb of data but I cant find anything inside them other than a few older personal files in the 'M.dmg'. I transferred my old computer on to this one but I've never seen this Deleted Users file before just worried about touching/deleting them if they're important. I have this computer for about three years now, not sure why I've never seen this.
Sorry I rambled, basically I'm just worried what these are exactly. They both have about 1gb of data but I cant see anything other than a few things in the old user .dmg and I have no idea what aspnet.dmg even is...What are they? Should I delete them? & Why do they seem to have pretty much nothing but say its 1gb each? I'm just confused, Thanks!

oba wrote:
I still have no idea how this folder made it's way to my sidebar. I'm not sure if there is a way to determine that with Time Machine.
I think I will change my passwords, I'm on a hidden Wi-Fi Network with just family computers and my passwords are obsurd.
I'm going to mark your question as having solved my problem because it appears that it did, at least for the part I was worried about.
Thanks for the help!
What is the new sidebar folder called? It could just be a new feature.
Changing passwords can help if you think things may be compromised, it's best to add really good & unique passwords if possible.
Hidden wifi is a bit of a misnomer. Everytime your Mac sends data the 'hidden' access point is revealed to an extent. There is nothing wrong with it, but don't assume it adds extra security, it just discourages people who try to connect to every visible network. You still need WPA2 encryption if possible (WEP is too easily cracked).
Don't forget to dig out any old files from the old account, there may be some buried treasure

Similar Messages

'Deleted Users' folder appeared

Just tonight I noticed a 'Deleted Users' folder in my Finder window, it contains a folder with my user account name. This was not there ever until tonight and I have not deleted any accounts so I have no idea what happened to make this show up.
The files in the deleted user account folder as as new as 08/30/2013, I have my settings locked with an admin password and my machine is never left alone without being asleep or otherwise requiring a password.
Could this have been from a recent software update of some kind? I have only done one non-app store upgrade recently and it was from Avatron's Air Display which I don't suspect.
Has anyone else seen this?

oba wrote:
I still have no idea how this folder made it's way to my sidebar. I'm not sure if there is a way to determine that with Time Machine.
I think I will change my passwords, I'm on a hidden Wi-Fi Network with just family computers and my passwords are obsurd.
I'm going to mark your question as having solved my problem because it appears that it did, at least for the part I was worried about.
Thanks for the help!
What is the new sidebar folder called? It could just be a new feature.
Changing passwords can help if you think things may be compromised, it's best to add really good & unique passwords if possible.
Hidden wifi is a bit of a misnomer. Everytime your Mac sends data the 'hidden' access point is revealed to an extent. There is nothing wrong with it, but don't assume it adds extra security, it just discourages people who try to connect to every visible network. You still need WPA2 encryption if possible (WEP is too easily cracked).
Don't forget to dig out any old files from the old account, there may be some buried treasure

RE: (forte-users) Confusion with return event

Samer,
The return event is delivered to the calling task, which is the window in
your first test. It is not deliverd to the event loop of the service object
unless the call to the processor originated in the event loop, which is the
case in your second test. The output you get from the server is exactly as I
would expect.
You need the following code in you client:
event loop
postregister
SomeService1.StartImmediate();
when SomeService1.Proc.ProcessEvent_return do
task.Part.Logmgr.Putline('ProcessEvents_return');
when SomeService1.Proc.ProcessEvent_exception do
task.Part.Logmgr.Putline('ProcessEvents_exception');
end event;
Note that this logoutput will not be written to a logfile, but will appear
in the logwindow which is opened when you start a client application.
Pascal Rottier
Atos Origin Nederland (BAS/West End User Computing)
Tel. +31 (0)10-2661223
Fax. +31 (0)10-2661199
E-mail: Pascal.Rottiernl.origin-it.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Philip Morris (Afd. MIS)
Tel. +31 (0)164-295149
Fax. +31 (0)164-294444
E-mail: Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch
-----Original Message-----
From: Samer Kanjo [mailto:skanjoyahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 1:54 AM
To: ForteUsers
Subject: (forte-users) Confusion with return event
I have observed some odd behavior when attempting to
catch a return event for a method invoked using start
task. I provided the primary classes I used during my
test and some output produced by those classes at the
bottom of this message.
The SomeService1 class is used to create an
environment visible service object and the Processor
class is one of its members. The Processor class
starts processing when one of two things happens: the
SomeService1 timer ticks off 10 seconds or when
SomeService1.StartImmediate is called directly by
another entity. Either way StartImmediate is called to
start processing.
The provided output is the result of starting a test
application and invoking StartImmediate from another
object (I used a window) and then observing what
happens when the timer ticks. As you can see the
invocation from the window did not result in the
return event being received. However, the return event
was received when the timer ticked.
According to the Forte documentation a return event
will only be posted to the parent task's event queue.
Since I am making a cross partition call, the window
and service object are not really in the same task
(Unless my assumption is wrong). That would explain
why the window did not cause a return event to be
generated but was an event generated but not caught
and if so where did the event go?
In SomeService2 class I added an event StartProcessing
and moved the code from StartImmediate to the
StartProcessing event case in the event loop and
simply posted the StartProcessing event in
StartImmediate. I performed the same test I used when
testing SomeService1. The Traceback output is
identical for the window invocation but the return
event is received this time! Why?
It seems that to guarantee the receipt of a return
event an asynchronous task must be initiated from
within an event loop. Is this correct?
I do not understand this behavior does someone have
any thoughts on this? How can you guarantee the
receipt of a return event?
Samer Kanjo
OUTPUT FROM SOMESERVICE1
StartTaskTest_cl0: processing loop listening
StartTaskTest_cl0:
Traceback:
SomeService.StartImmediate at line 1
TestWin.Display at line 4
C++ Method(s)
UserApp.Run at offset 105
StartTaskTest_cl0:
StartTaskTest_cl0: Start processing...
StartTaskTest_cl0: Processing complete.
StartTaskTest_cl0:
Traceback:
SomeService.StartImmediate at line 1
SomeService.ProcessingLoop at line 9
StartTaskTest_cl0:
StartTaskTest_cl0: Start processing...
StartTaskTest_cl0: Processing complete.
StartTaskTest_cl0: ProcessEvents_return
OUTPUT FROM SOMESERVICE2
StartTaskTest_cl0: processing loop listening
StartTaskTest_cl0:
Traceback:
SomeService2.StartImmediate at line 1
TestWin.Display at line 4
C++ Method(s)
UserApp.Run at offset 105
StartTaskTest_cl0:
StartTaskTest_cl0: Start processing...
StartTaskTest_cl0: Processing complete.
StartTaskTest_cl0: ProcessEvents_return
StartTaskTest_cl0:
Traceback:
SomeService2.StartImmediate at line 1
SomeService2.ProcessingLoop at line 9
StartTaskTest_cl0:
StartTaskTest_cl0: Start processing...
StartTaskTest_cl0: Processing complete.
StartTaskTest_cl0: ProcessEvents_return
SOMESERVICE1 CLASS
begin CLASS;
class SomeService1 inherits from Framework.Object
has public attribute proc: StartTaskTest.Processor;
has public attribute processing: Framework.boolean;
has public method Init;
has public method ProcessingLoop;
has public method StartImmediate;
has property
shared=(allow=off, override=on);
transactional=(allow=off, override=on);
monitored=(allow=off, override=on);
distributed=(allow=on, override=on, default=off);
end class;
method SomeService1.Init
begin
super.Init();
processing = FALSE;
proc = new;
start task ProcessingLoop();
end method;
method SomeService1.ProcessingLoop
begin
timer : Timer = new;
timer.tickInterval = 10000;
event loop
task.part.logmgr.putline('processing loop
listening');
timer.isActive = TRUE;
when timer.tick do
StartImmediate();
when proc.ProcessEvents_return do
task.part.logmgr.putline('ProcessEvents_return');
processing = FALSE;
when proc.ProcessEvents_exception do
task.part.logmgr.putline('ProcessEvents_exception');
processing = FALSE;
when task.shutdown do
exit;
end event;
end method;
method SomeService1.StartImmediate
begin
task.part.logmgr.putline(task.traceBack());
processing = TRUE;
start task proc.ProcessEvents() where completion =
event;
end method;
end CLASS;
SOMESERVICE2 CLASS
begin CLASS;
class SomeService2 inherits from Framework.Object
has public attribute proc: StartTaskTest.Processor;
has public attribute processing: Framework.boolean;
has public event StartProcessing;
has public method Init;
has public method ProcessingLoop;
has public method StartImmediate;
has property
shared=(allow=off, override=on);
transactional=(allow=off, override=on);
monitored=(allow=off, override=on);
distributed=(allow=on, override=on, default=off);
end class;
method SomeService2.Init
begin
super.Init();
processing = FALSE;
proc = new;
start task ProcessingLoop();
end method;
method SomeService2.ProcessingLoop
begin
timer : Timer = new;
timer.tickInterval = 10000;
event loop
task.part.logmgr.putline('processing loop
listening');
timer.isActive = TRUE;
when timer.tick do
StartImmediate();
when self.StartProcessing do
processing = TRUE;
start task proc.ProcessEvents() where completion =
event;
when proc.ProcessEvents_return do
task.part.logmgr.putline('ProcessEvents_return');
processing = FALSE;
when proc.ProcessEvents_exception do
task.part.logmgr.putline('ProcessEvents_exception');
processing = FALSE;
when task.shutdown do
exit;
end event;
end method;
method SomeService2.StartImmediate
begin
task.part.logmgr.putline(task.traceBack());
post StartProcessing;
end method;
end CLASS;
PROCESSOR CLASS
begin CLASS;
class Processor inherits from Framework.Object
has public method Init;
has public method ProcessEvents where completion =
(return = ProcessEvents_return, exception =
ProcessEvents_exception);
has property
shared=(allow=off, override=on);
transactional=(allow=off, override=on);
monitored=(allow=off, override=on);
distributed=(allow=off, override=on);
end class;
method Processor.Init
begin
super.Init();
end method;
method Processor.ProcessEvents
begin
task.part.logmgr.putline('Start processing...');
task.Delay(msecs = 1500);
task.part.logmgr.putline('Processing complete.');
end method;
end CLASS;
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Yes, you're right. The return event is queued until the moment that you
actually enter an eventloop. I stand corrected.
Pascal Rottier
Atos Origin Nederland (BAS/West End User Computing)
Tel. +31 (0)10-2661223
Fax. +31 (0)10-2661199
E-mail: Pascal.Rottiernl.origin-it.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Philip Morris (Afd. MIS)
Tel. +31 (0)164-295149
Fax. +31 (0)164-294444
E-mail: Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch
-----Original Message-----
From: Adamek, Zenon [mailto:ZAdamekpurolator.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 6:13 PM
To: Rottier, Pascal
Cc: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Confusion with return event
I think it is always safe to use start task with where complition = event
clause before event loop. The reason is described in Forte Help in the
Complition Clause index:
"Requesting the return and exception events automatically registers the
events for the calling task. When the asynchronous method completes or
terminates, Forté adds the appropriate event to the calling task's event
queue.
This registration is unlike the event registration for the event statement.
In the event statement, the event is registered just before the event
statement is ready to process the event. In the start task statement, the
return and exception events are registered when the task is started, even
though it can be much later on that your application is prepared to wait for
those events. Therefore, only the "parent" task that executes the start task
statement is registered for the completion event of the started task."
and some comments from "Forte Performance and Patterns" page 18:
"When you use the where completion = event clause in the start task
statement, Forte automatically buffer the return event until you register
for it. Therefore, you do not need to worry about the child task completing
before you register for its return event".
Regards,
Zenon
-----Original Message-----
From: Rottier, Pascal [SMTP:Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 11:16 AM
To: 'Samer Kanjo'; ForteUsers
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Confusion with return event
Yes, if you want the eventloop of the service object to be informed when
the
method on the processor class is invoked, regardless of who invoked it,
then
you should simply post an event as the last statement inside the method on
the processor class.
The return events are only used to inform a partent task that a child-task
has completed. So, only the calling task receives the event, only if the
calling task is inside an event-loop at the moment the child-task
terminates
and only if there really is a child task (method started using "start task
Note, that the calling task doesn't have to be inside an event loop when
the
asynchronous call is made. It has to be inside an eventloop when the
asynchronous task terminates. The following piece of code works just as
well:
SomeService1.StartImmediate();
self.DoSomeOtherStuff();
event loop
when SomeService1.Proc.ProcessEvent_return do
task.Part.Logmgr.Putline('ProcessEvents_return');
when SomeService1.Proc.ProcessEvent_exception do
task.Part.Logmgr.Putline('ProcessEvents_exception');
end event;
However, if the asynchronous task started from within "StartImmediate"
finishes before the client gets a chance to enter its event loop, then
you're too late to catch the event. That's why it's safer to use the
"postregister" function, which makes sure a certain action is not started
untill all events from the event loop have been registered.
Pascal Rottier
Atos Origin Nederland (BAS/West End User Computing)
Tel. +31 (0)10-2661223
Fax. +31 (0)10-2661199
E-mail: Pascal.Rottiernl.origin-it.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Philip Morris (Afd. MIS)
Tel. +31 (0)164-295149
Fax. +31 (0)164-294444
E-mail: Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch
-----Original Message-----
From: Samer Kanjo [mailto:skanjoyahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 5:04 PM
To: ForteUsers
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Confusion with return event
Pascal,
So you are confirming that a return event can only be
received in an event loop if a task is started from
within that event loop.
After making your proposed changes I was able to
receive the return event in the window.
I originally wanted the SomeService event loop to
always receive the return event regardless of whether
or not StartImmediate is called by some other entity
or called when the timer ticks. It seems that the only
way to do this is with events. Is that correct?
Thank you for insight,
Samer Kanjo
--- "Rottier, Pascal" <Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch>
wrote:
Samer,
The return event is delivered to the calling task,
which is the window in
your first test. It is not deliverd to the event
loop of the service object
unless the call to the processor originated in the
event loop, which is the
case in your second test. The output you get from
the server is exactly as I
would expect.
You need the following code in you client:
event loop
postregister
SomeService1.StartImmediate();
when SomeService1.Proc.ProcessEvent_return do
task.Part.Logmgr.Putline('ProcessEvents_return');
when SomeService1.Proc.ProcessEvent_exception do
task.Part.Logmgr.Putline('ProcessEvents_exception');
end event;
Note that this logoutput will not be written to a
logfile, but will appear
in the logwindow which is opened when you start a
client application.
Pascal Rottier
Atos Origin Nederland (BAS/West End User Computing)
Tel. +31 (0)10-2661223
Fax. +31 (0)10-2661199
E-mail: Pascal.Rottiernl.origin-it.com
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Philip Morris (Afd. MIS)
Tel. +31 (0)164-295149
Fax. +31 (0)164-294444
E-mail: Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch--
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Deleted user dmg has no info in it

I deleted a user and have a saved dmg in the deleted users file. I need to access some files that were on their desktop. When I click on the appropriate dmg, it mounts, but then there is no info inside. Any ideas/suggestions? Is there somewhere where I can find the deleted users files? Thanks,

Yes, that is what I tried. The dmg will mount and say that it has 4.6 GB of info, but then there is nothing in it?!?! I'm thoroughly confused. Everything happens exactly as in that article you suggested, except there is no info inside the mounted disk.
Found the most important file, for some reason was unreadable at first but fixed that, now I would like to view the dmg, but am ready to throw in the towel if this doesn't have an easy answer. Thanks

Snow Leopard Server - Can't delete users in WGM?

Hi!
I have 2 Mac OS X Server 10.6.4 machines. One is an OD-master and the other is a replica. Since last week I haven't been able to delete user accounts in WGM. It doesn't give me any error and at first glance it looks like the account is deleted, but the account pops up again when searching for that user i WGM.
I also noticed that Server Admin freezes and need a force quit when I click the "Settings" tab for det OD-service.
I suspect the two problems are related somehow, but I can't figure out how to fix them. I've read through a couple of forum posts here but couldn't find anyone with a similar question/problem.
Changing passwords and other settings work fine on user accounts. The syncing between OD master and Replica also works.
The problem is identical on both machines. Deleting accounts doesn't work and Server Admin crashes when checking the "settings" tab on the OD-service.
Has anyone got a clue what I should do och look for?

I managed to solve the problem a couple of days ago. This is what I did.
At first I thought Server Admin crashed when choosing the OD-service, but I was mistaken. It didn't crash, just stalled for a long time (up to 20 minutes as soon as I clicked on something in the OD-service).
My main concern was that my latest OD-backup was a month old and I really wanted a fresh archive before I tried to rebuild the OD-master. So if you already have a working archive you can skip the next part.
Another problem was that the archive-feature did not work at all on any of my two servers.. I could reach the archive-function (with 20 minutes delay on each click) but it resulted in no archive and didn't give me any errors, so I'm glad I checked to see that an archive was actually made. So I promoted my replica to an OD-master and after that Server Admin didn't freeze for 20 minutes any more in the OD-service and the archive function worked again. So I did a fresh archive.
Now that I had a fresh OD-archive I demoted the (original) OD-master to a Standalone server. Then made it an OD-master again and imported the OD-archive I made from the replica. Everything worked fine and I could delete users again and Server Admin didn't freeze any more. I hooked up the replica to the OD-master and since then I've had no problem. I hope this helps someone else with the same/similar problem.

Cannot remove deleted user from people picker - SharePoint Foundation 2010

So I think I've read all the people picker articles here and I can't find a solution so I thought I'd start a new thread. Here is the issue:
A user was deleted from Active Directory and removed from SharePoint Foundation 2010. The user was still showing in the People Picker within the site collection, so we have performed a few things to try and get rid of this user.
User is deleted from AD
User is deleted from SharePoint Site Collection
Have tried stsadm -o deleteuser
Have removed all mention of this user from UserInfo table
User does NOT show in
https://<SiteCollectionURL/_layouts/people.aspx?MembershipGroupId=0
Cannot find any mention of this user anywhere.
Ran a full crawl as we read on a forum somewhere that it might help.
If I try and add the user back to SharePoint I get "The user does not exist or is not unique"
If I try "stsadm -o deleteuser -userlogin DOMAIN\USER -url https://<sitecollectionurl>" I get "The user does not exist or is not unique"
I am not sure what else I can try now. Can anyone help?
Thanks,
Vinny
Vinny

No other domain trusts that this user could be in.
Just so everyone can stop with the warnings, we do NOT regularly delete users from the UserInfo table and fully are aware of the problems behind it, which is why it is so rarely done. But at times, you have to do what you have to do to help a customer, you
know? This one user is the only one that was removed from the UserInfo table, but there are a few other users that are also deleted (from SharePoint, not manually from UserInfo) that are still showing as well. This one user included.
There MUST be another place that the people picker gets it's information from. ALL of the user's old information still shows in the people picker (username, email address, display name), and yet none of that information exists anywhere other than in the
People Picker. Mailbox is gone from Exchange, User deleted from SharePoint, User deleted from Active Directory. Is there no cache someone could point me towards that People Picker might store information in.
Vinny

Cannot delete users from Catalog Manager

We're trying to delete users who no longer have access to OBIEE from the Catalog Manager. When we try we get an error saying access denied for user to path /users/[userid]... I know we can go out to the file system and manually delete the folder but we would like to use the Catalog Manager for this so that we can delegate this to our security staff.
Is a configuration setting wrong somewhere? It fails with users who have been granted admin rights as well as for the administrator id.
Security is configured with Hyperion Shared Services via an initialization block This is working fine. When we add a user to a group in Shared Services, the user catalog is created when the user logs in. We just can't get rid of it after removing the user from the Shared Services group.
We are running everything except the Admin Tool on AIX.
Thanks.
Jerry

I'm not sure I understand.
My system is configured to use Hyperion Shared Services for authentication. We do not create users in OBIEE. We create groups in OBIEE and assign them privileges. We then create the same groups in Shared Services. We add users to the appropriate group in Shared Services. When the user logs in, their user folder is created. When we need to remove a user's access, we take them out of the Shared Services group. We then want to delete their user folder in the catalog. We log in as an admin (we even tried this with the Administrator account), but we get the error.
Is there any way to delete users via OBI Presentation Services > Administration > Manage Catalog?
Thanks.
Jerry

Cannot delete users from the Central Management Console

I cannot delete users from the Central Management Console. I'm logged in to Enterprise as administrator but still get the following error:
There was an error while writing data back to the server: Sorry, you do not have the right to 'Delete objects' (id - 22) for 'koberg' (id - 725415). Please contact your system or permissions administrator if you require this right.
Thanks in advance for any help on this matter.

Oops, my mistake, sorry. Ok, so the Administrator cannot delete user koberg.
Check top level:
Logon to CMC, browse to Home > Settings and select the Rights tab. These are your top level settings. Factory default will show only Administrators and Everyone. Select the Net Access "Advanced" for the Administrators group. NB: Do not select these group names links - they will jump you out of the top level! On the Advanced rights page, ensure the right to "Delete objects" is explicitly granted.
Then set for the Users top level folder:
In the CMC, browse to Home, and select Users. Select the "Rights" button. Again - NB: Do not select these group names links - they will jump you out of the Users top level folder! Set the Administrators group to "Full Control". Save.
That should be all you need. However, there is a possibility the previous admin was busy setting security not only at the account level, but on groups so we need to verify the user:
In the CMC, browse to Home, and select Users. In the User list, select koberg. In the koberg account page, select the Rights tab. If the Administrators is not set to (Inherited Rights), make it so, and when you select the "Update" button, you should see the Net Access update to "Full Control". If this is the case, you should follow these steps on each account and accomplish this.
And if you still can't delete it, verify the groups:
In the CMC, browse to Home, and select Users. In the User list, select koberg. In the koberg account page, select the "Member of" tab. Note all groups koberg is a member of. Then in the CMC, browse to Home, and select Groups. Select the name hyperlink for the group(s) that koberg belongs to. On the group page, select the Rights tab, and ensure the Administrators have (Inherited Rights) - Full Control on all of these, also. If not, set it.
Finally, I know you inherited this, but let's overview some basics of simplifying your deployment administration. Follow these guidelines, and your administration life will be so much easier.
1. The Everyone group should never have any subgroups. Ever. All accounts on the system are a member of the Everyone group. Adding subgroups to the Everyone group is redundant.
2. For simplicity's sake, Application level access should be set on the Adminstrators Group, and the Everyone group. I know there are customers who add groups to application rights. I don't understand why users would have an account on the system if they are not allowed access to InfoView, but it's your system.
3. From a report object perspective, the Everyone group should be set at the top level to "No Access". This will result in them having no rights on anything at all. You break this inheritance at the application level to give them access to InfoView and other apps. On folders and objects, you ADD groups, then assign (ADD) rights as desired.
4. If you can help it, never explicitly deny a right to any user or group for any object or application. Explicitly deny overrides any other setting. If a user belongs to group A and group B, and group A is explicitly denied a right, you can explicitly grant it for group B or the user all day long, and it will still be denied. Always try to put yourself in the position of adding groups/users, and adding rights, then inheriting as far down the folder tree as you can.

Not Enough Hard Drive Space on my Mac Mini to Save Deleted User Account Folder: What to do?

I am no longer able to access my original user account on my mac mini because the account is corrupted and won't load. Thanks to the helpful advice I found on the internet, I was able to create a new user account and resume using my mac, but all of my old files are trapped in the old user account.
The plan was to delete the old user account, create a disk image of the old account folders, and then migrate those folders to the new user account. Unfortunately, I don't have enough disc space left on my Mac to do that. I have just under 11gb left after deleting absolutely everything I could, and I need 81gb for the old user files. The back up plan was to select the "don't change the home folder" option, but when I went to delete the account, there was no such option. The message simply read:
"The user's home folder will not be saved. To do so, you need 81.1gb of free disk space. Try emptying the trash or deleting other files on your disk, then deleting the user account. If you do not want to save the user's home folder, click delete immediately."
My only two choices were CANCEL or DELETE IMMEDIATELY. There was no "don't change the home folder" option.
So I am not sure how to proceed. Here are some questions:
1) is there a way to save the disk image directly to an external drive instead of the user's folder on the mac hard drive?
2) If I use the "delete immediately" option, will the files go into a "deleted users" folder where they can be recovered or will they just be erased from the computer and unretrievable?
3) Is there a way to use terminal to change access permission on the original user account files so that I can copy them onto an external drive or integrate them with the new user account without having to first delete the original user account?
4) In the absence of deleting the user account, will using either:
sudo chown -R `id -un` /Users/oldusername
and/or
sudo chmod -R u+rw /Users/oldusername
in Terminal allow the new user account permission to access the original user files and merge them seamlessly into my new user account? Or must I delete the original account first?
5) Is there something else I haven't thought of that would work, would be more efficient, or more effective? This wouldn't be the first time I have overthought a solution...
When considering any solutions, please keep in mind that I cannot launch the original user account as that starts the whole endless loading loop. So, while I have the password for the original user account, any solution would appear to require that I work from the new user account only, without launching the old account. Also I am a complete newbie at this. I've used Macs exclusively for 17 years but this is the first time I've had to do anything like this. Up to now, everything has always "just worked". So please be as detailed with any instructions as possible!
Any help greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Mac Mini 2ghz 1g ram running OS 10.4.11

I think ComputerFixer is correct, you should be able to drag and drop it to another drive, no worries. However, if not, you could create an disk image of it using DiskUtility and create it on a new drive. But again, I don't think that is necessary. If you have administrator rights with your new account, can you simply go into the old user account folder and drag and drop the files you want to save? I have done that as well as copy the older user account to another drive (in my case, another computer on the network) and salgage my files from there. Is that an option for you?

We have a long list of disabled/deleted users in AD Somehow, they are still appeared as active user in Sharepoint Online. How do we get rid of those list? Hope you can advice. Thanks.

we have a long list of disabled/deleted users in AD
Somehow, they are still appeared as active user in Sharepoint Online.
How do we get rid of those list?
Hope you can advice. Thanks.

SharePoint does not remove users from SharePoint permissions just because they were deleted/disabled in AD. This is to maintain referential integrity. In fact, when you delete a user from SharePoint, that user remains in the SharePoint content database,
just marked as deleted.
They do not have access to SharePoint given their account is deleted/disabled. But as far as automatically managing this, I'm not aware of a tool. On-prem there is Metalogix ControlPoint which does a great job of this, I haven't explored the O365 options.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Not able to create, deleted user again in OIM

Hi,
As part of our porcess we susped the user on the next day of his/her last working day. And after 20 days we are deleting that user from OIM.
Now the deleted user again re-hire into the organization. So we need to re-create the user in OIM.
But we are unable to create the user in OIM 11g. And it is showing error as "user already exist".
Then we found there is an entry for this user in OIM repository as usr_status as deleted. And also we are not able to see this user in the OIM admin console even there is an entry in repository.
Please help us how to solve this issue in creating the identity in OIM.
Thanks in advance
Siva

If you want to re-create a deleted user with the same user id then you need to set the re-use id property to true and also drop the unique key contraint from the USR table.
Ref: Re: Steps for re-using the same user id of a deleted user in OIM 11g ?
-Bikash

Error while trying to delete user in OIM 11gR1

Hi,
When I try to delete the user from OIM console by clicking on 'Delete User' button, I get the following error:
"The Delete operation failed. Bulk Orchestration not yet implmented" on the cosole.
Kindly help in resolving the issue.
Regards

I have been able to resolve the issue now.
I followed the below steps for the same:
1. In the Welcome page for Oracle Identity Manager Administration, under System Management, click System Configuration.
2. In the left pane, search for system properties.
3. In the search result, select the Period to Delay User Delete property.
4. Edit the property value to 0.
5. Save the property.
After setting the same, I was able to successfully delete the user.
Regards.
Edited by: 963540 on Jun 4, 2013 5:11 AM

Steps for re-using the same user id of a deleted user in OIM 11g ?

Hello experts,
By Default, in OIM 11.1.1.5.0 it is not allowing to re-use the same user id of a deleted user.
Consider a user with user id as "ABCD1234". The user is deleted from OIM and it is not getting displayed in the user search. But in DB we could see that user details with "Deleted" status. Say accidently this hard delete has happened .
How do we create that user again with same user id ?
What is recommended for such scenario ?
Thanks,
DK

I suggest disable the unique index instead of dropping it using ALTER INDEX <INDEX_NAME> DISABLE command.
Better way to handle this do below
1. disable index
2. update usr_login for deleted user using sql query eg. xx|usr_login and commit it ( update usr set usr_login='xx'|| usr_login where upper(usr_status)='DELETED')
3. enable your index
4. now login to OIM and easily you can create user with the previous user login
In this case your Index is still enbaled so it won't hamper the performancem, because this index is being used in various places for user search.
NOTE: disable any other constraints if required. But, I don't think so. Just disabling unique index will allow you to update"
--nayan

I am trying to clean up my iMac hard drive and find a lot of space in 'Deleted Users'...what is this and can I delete that folder?

I am trying to clean up my iMac hard drive and find a lot of space in a folder named 'Deleted Users'...what is this and can I delete it to save space?

If a user account is deleted and the data for that account is not deleted, it is placed there. Yes, you can delete the files there.

Deleted User recovery in SAP R/3

Hi :
By mistakenly I have deleted user from the user list . After some time i came to know that , that user is productive user.
Can any one help me for how to recover the user from deleted list.
Thanks
Chimsi

Hi,
I do not think that will be possible. You can recreate the same user-id though, and he/she shall be able to carry on (get the workflow items, inbox, transport requests and so on, of the earlier user-id).
It maybe possible to search CDHDR and CDPOS tables to get some details of user deletion.
cheers,

Deleted Users Confusion/Worry

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for