Deleting spam warning threads...

Both BluShadow and I recently reported a spammer.
It appears that they have now been removed, but why have our threads in this forum also been deleted?
Cheers
Ben

Can the same be done for broken doc link threads ?
I reported a broken link here (Broken doc link and it seems to have been fixed.
Thanks
Srini

Similar Messages

TS2755 I note with IOS8 that when I delete a msg from a thread it still shows up with the time as a recent msg. How do I remove this without deleting the entire thread?

I Note with the iOS8 update when I now delete a msg from a contact thread it still shows up with the time as a recent msg. How do I delete this from recent without deleting the entire thread?

BC
My understanding is that music syncing is a one way process from computer iTunes to your iPhone. I think what you are asking is to have IOS synching back to an OSX or PC system. The software doesn't work that way.
You either have to uncheck the songs to be synced or create a separate playlist for "BC Canada iPhone" and only sync that playlist.
As well any purchases you made on your iPhone need to be transferred to your iTunes so they can come back to your phone when you re-sync.
Hope this helps, even though it's not the answer you might have wanted.
Cheers

Spam report thread too long by now?

The present Spam report thread [4] was initiated over a year ago when the old thread was 190 messages long, because "...the previous thread ... has served its purpose but is getting too long to be read comfortably on mobile devices". Well, the present thread has well exceeded that mark, as it was 422 messages long at the time I started to write this message.
Wouldn't it be time to let the present thread rest in peace by the same argument that led to the closing of the previous one? Not that I use mobile devices to visit these forums, but...

The idea of closing Spam threads when they get too long and replace them by brand new ones is not mine. As I said in my opening message here, it was the official argument for closing the [3] Spam thread when it was 190 messages long. Well, the [4] Spam thread got 422 messages long and there was no official reaction, so I opened this thread to find if this was just an oversight.
A few days later, the [4] Spam thread was archived (and therefore closed) for reasons that were never explained, and a replacement one was no opened, so I tentatively opened a new one, the present [5] version, explaining my reasons for doing so:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/837370?tstart=0
Now the [5] Spam thread is 476 messages long (at the time of writing this), and it has not been closed, archived or replaced, so I don't think any participant should open a replacement one. This should be done officially by someone with the power to close the present version.
On the other hand, if the reason given for closing the [3] version is no longer valid, and the length of Spam threads has no importance whatsoever, I think this should be clearly stated. As I access the forums through browsers, the length of the threads does not affect me in the least, and I have no idea if it affects participants accessing the forums by other means.

Is there any way I can request admin to delete my own thread?

Hi,
Is there any way I can request admin to delete my own thread?

I think this is not possible.
But why you want to delete an own thread?

Why are the Apple mods deleting and locking threads?

I would like an answer as to why the mods are deleting and locking threads that have to do with the error that pervasive in the iPod 1.1 upgrade. It seems that Apple will not acknowledge it but some of us are trying to find an answer and Apple locks the thread and deletes another one. As paying customers, Apple should realize that it is us who keeps the lights on in Cupertino. I think a bit more respect to the paying customer is in order here.

Just post your questions and replies in a calm and concise way Don and follow the guidelines within the Terms of Use;-):
http://discussions.apple.com/help.jspa#adua
Contrary to any belief you may have I can assure you that there are no attempts of covering up any alleged bugs in software or anything else in these fora.
Here's a reframe to your original question - The fact that the thread was locked means that the Hosts have seen the thread. It is reasonable therefore to conclude that they would have allerted the relevant people of the issue and referred them to that thread.

Delete notification warning in notification

When a customer has a Contact Person, if I create a notification using this sold-to-party, and i don't enter a contact person (we don't use CP for notifications), this warning appears:
"Contact person not entered" (Message no. /DBM/CUSTOMER413)
How can I delete this warning.
Thnxs,
Gonzalo.

Dear,
the answer i need was:
Hi Gonzalo,
the warning message would appear when you have assigned to your customer master data a contact person CP in the partner function.
This is the DBM-standard. If you need a different procedure please copy
the DBM-function module /DBM/CU17_CHECK_BEFORE_SAVE into your own name
space and comment the line 95 (MESSAGE w413.)
if there are CPs at the customer but not in the notification ->
warning
MESSAGE w413.
Afterwards include in the user exit EXIT_SAPMIWO0_020 instead of the FM
/DBM/CU17_CHECK_BEFORE_SAVE your own function module (TCODE CMOD).
If you have further questions please let us know.
Thanks anyway!

How does one delete spam without first clicking on it and therefore causing it to open?

How do you delete spam without first clicking on it and therefore opening it?

I'm running 10.6 so I don't know if this works the same in 10.7 -- I would think it will. But if you double click the separator at the center bottom of the Mail window, thereby expanding it (the mouse pointer will turn into a cross), you can then single click and highlight a message without opening it. Next hit CMD-Shift-S, which will save the message to the location of your choice (I use the Desktop), where you can safely read it without ever having opened it. If you like, you can trash the message at this point.
Double clicking the same point on the window will return the window to normal viewing.
And, yes, it's a good idea to never actually open spam. Also, make sure load remote images is turned off all the time. An opened remote image is one way spammers know they've found a sucker and they keep it up. If you never open spam, it discourages further spam.
Opening spam may sometimes actually "do something." A friend of my wife just recently opened a message and it stole her address book. But maybe she clicked on a link inside. Don't know all the details.

How can I delete spam residing in my iCloud account?

How can I delete spam residing in my iCloud account?

Still seeing the other person's iCloud tabs does not necessarily indicate that they still have access to your iCloud account. iCloud tabs will remain for up to 7 days even if a device is no longer active on your iCloud account. After 7 days they should automatically be cleared.

Deleting spam emails

My mailbox won`t let me delete spam messages unless I open them first. Does anyone know a way around this please. Also is opening a spam email in preview risky for my mac or my file security?

sorry I can't answer yoyr question, but I do have the very same issue.

Deleting spam mail

Can anyone tell me how to mass delete spam on my I-phone 3g? one at a time will take forever,

There is no Delete All feature, except in the Trash mailbox. One at a time is the only way (you can tap the selection dot next to each email, so you don't have to open each one, but that's still a lot of tapping).
It's usually faster and easier to access your email account via a computer mail client or web browser to clean out your spam folder.

Delete spam om imac

Delete spam on imac

Hello, are you "training" it to send it to the Junk folder?
You can set in preferences when to delete Junk, or Right click on the Junk Folder or individual eMailes & select delete.

Mail & SpamSieve - how to delete spam on server too (POP) - option needed

I am using the newest Mail (2.0.7), Mac OS X (10.4.6) and SpamSieve (2.4.3).
I access my mail through POP. SpamSieve moves junk mail to the Spam
folder, from where I delete it (move to Trash, and empty trash (erase deleted messages in all accounts). Still I find my junk mails in my account on the mail server, eg when using mail through the web.
Before, I used Eudora with SpamSieve, and it would delete the junk mail on the server too (actually immediately on detection).
How do I accomplish that with Mail and SpamSieve?
TIA
Marc
(PS I do want to keep the good mail on the server, at least for some time.)
Barry Margolin in comp.sys.mac.system:
I don't think there's a way to do this. Preferences->Accounts->Advanced
has a menu with choices of when to remove messages from the server, but
"When erased on client" is not one of the choices. The closest is "When
moved from Inbox".
Too bad "When erased on client" is not present - it should be (Apple, are you listening?)
Marc
12" PB G4/1.2GHz- Mac Book Pro - 12" iB G3/500 MHz - PowerMac G4/450 MHz Mac OS X (10.4.6)

I don't know how SpamSieve works, but I'm pretty sure it has no bearing on this. The problem is that Mail doesn't have the option to remove mail from the server when it's deleted locally, and thus, there is no way to automatically remove only undesired mail from the server.
The article you've quoted is correct. The closest you can get to what you (and others) want in Mail is to remove messages from the server when moved from Inbox, because that's the only option available in Mail to remove messages from server using a criterion other than the time they've been there. In my case, that's not an option, because I keep all mail organized in custom mailboxes, leaving in Inbox unread messages only.

How to delete the warnning log in CheckDB LOG

hi,experts,
now, i have a trouble question.
could you help me to solved it, thanks in advanced.
SAP system(NetWeaver7.00), (T-code)DB13 there is a job named CheckDB.
i deleted the NextExtent job in the 2009.10.1
then, after 10 days, there was a warning in the CheckDB LOG.
it is u2193u2193u2193
Database operation alert - level: WARNING, operation: cebskwfy.nxt, time: 2009-10-01 10.00.34, condition: Last successful 'nxt' operation older than 10 days
Now, i want to Delete the log in the CheckDB LOG.
but i dont know how to do.
by the way. the object of (DBO)OPERATION_TOO_OLD is chk , and the object of (DBO)OPERATION_TOO_OLD is blank.
what is the difference bewteen them?
thanks and regards.
chu

Thanks for your reply.
If i am going to delete the log in the checkDBLOG,
Can you tell me how to do.
maybe it is not deleted in the sap system. i think.
thanks and regards
chu

Delete pnp warning

Hallow I have warning (in check) when I use the logical database pnpce
All time in all program
How I delete it
This is the description
regards
In Unicode programs, the "-" character cannot appear in names, as it
does here in the name "PNP-SW-IGNORELOCKEDRECORDS".
Include DBPNPCECOM
In Unicode programs, the "-" character cannot appear in names, as it
does here in the name "PNP-SW-ENQUEUEPERNR".
Include DBPNPCECOM
In Unicode programs, the "-" character cannot appear in names, as it
does here in the name "PNP-SW-FOUND".
Include DBPNPCECOM
In Unicode programs, the "-" character cannot appear in names, as it
does here in the name "PNP-SW-AUTH-SKIPPED-RECORD

Uncheck the Unicode checkbox in the Program attributes.
~Suresh

Time Machine Oldest backups deleted without warning

I have about 350GB of data on my startup drive that is backed up by Time Machine onto another internal 1TB drive. My other internal and external drives are excluded.
I have just noticed that Time Machine shows my Oldest Backup to be 16th October 2008. When I go into the Options menu in Time Machine System Preferences it has 'Warn me when old backups are deleted' ticked. My backup drive has around 160GB free.
I have not been warned that Time Machine is deleting old backups. The ONLY warning it has given me is the occasional non-specific Time Machine error where it informs me that Time Machine was unable to complete the backup (not very useful) but when this happens it always carries on apparently successful on the next scheduled backup.
The only thing that I can think of to explain this situation is that on the 16th October I replaced one of my excluded hard drives with another. As soon as I had the opportunity I excluded the new drive from Time Machine - but as I used the Disk Utility restore feature, there was inevitably a short time when a new drive full of data was present and wasn't excluded (around 1TB of content on a 1.5TB drive).
If this drive replacement, and Time Machine suddenly thinking it needed to backup that new content caused it to suddenly delete old backups, then 1) why didn't it warn me, and 2) what is the correct protocol for excluding a drive that has just been restored (ie. cloned). Should I be turning Time Machine off before performing such a function?

bilbo_baggins wrote:
I have about 350GB of data on my startup drive that is backed up by Time Machine onto another internal 1TB drive. My other internal and external drives are excluded.
I have just noticed that Time Machine shows my Oldest Backup to be 16th October 2008. When I go into the Options menu in Time Machine System Preferences it has 'Warn me when old backups are deleted' ticked. My backup drive has around 160GB free.
I have not been warned that Time Machine is deleting old backups. The ONLY warning it has given me is the occasional non-specific Time Machine error where it informs me that Time Machine was unable to complete the backup (not very useful) but when this happens it always carries on apparently successful on the next scheduled backup.
The only thing that I can think of to explain this situation is that on the 16th October I replaced one of my excluded hard drives with another. As soon as I had the opportunity I excluded the new drive from Time Machine - but as I used the Disk Utility restore feature, there was inevitably a short time when a new drive full of data was present and wasn't excluded (around 1TB of content on a 1.5TB drive).
If this drive replacement, and Time Machine suddenly thinking it needed to backup that new content caused it to suddenly delete old backups, then 1) why didn't it warn me,
because TM is buggy. it's supposed to warn you in a situation like that but it often doesn't.
and 2) what is the correct protocol for excluding a drive that has just been restored (ie. cloned).
You can either turn off TM before restoring or exclude the drive before starting the cloning procedure. when a new drive is attached TM waits for 2 minutes and then tries to back it up. in that 2 minutes period you can add the drive to the exclusion list.
Should I be turning Time Machine off before performing such a function?

Deleting spam warning threads...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for