Delivary date parameter in vendor evaluation

hi
where we maintain the delivary date parameter in vendor evaluation.
nitin

Hi,
Delivery date in vendor evaluation is a subcriteria for On time delivery and its automatic (3)
Delivery date is calculated from GR from stastical delivery date in delivery schedule TAB and actual receipt date
Hope this is clear to you
BR
Diwakar
reward if useful

Similar Messages

MM Vendor evaluation integration (clarifying!)

Dear friends !
In which way MM uses the QM data to calculate vendor evaluation ? should I do something or this is standard when QM data are entered ?
best regards,
Ale

Hi,
In vendor Evaluation,
Quality Audit (Main Criteria : Quality)
Here QM data is required to certify the quality of material/goods/services
   1. A quality audit has taken place in one of your vendor's plants. This means that either your own company has carried out a check to determine how the vendor ensures that his products are of a high quality, or the vendor has carried out the audit himself.
   2. An audit lot is created by Quality Management. When the audit has been completed, the person responsible determines a score for this audit lot.
   3. All the audit lots are stored in a file with their scores.
   4. When you run an automatic re-evaluation of a vendor, the system selects all the audit lots for the vendor within the validity period.
   5. The parameter Quality audit is read from Customizing.
   6. If the indicator is set, the system calculates the average score for all the quality audits in the validity period. The result is the vendor's score for the quality audit.
      If the indicator is not set, only the most recent audit lot is included. This then represents the vendor's score for the subcriterion.
Note
The Evaln. QM system field on the screen for the main criterion "Quality" shows you the score that was awarded to the Quality Management system (e.g. ISO 9003 with certificate) used by the vendor. It is only displayed if the Prev. QM system field is filled in the vendor master record. The score is awarded by the QM system and is for information purposes only.
Display the vendor master record to see which quality system the vendor uses.
You can use the content of the field for your own program and have this score included in the vendoru2019s quality score.
If useful, Reward Me
Thanks & Regards
Swathi

Vendor Evaluation Purchasing Group wise

Dear Friends,
My clients Requirement is to evaluate vendors based on Product group wise.
I can use dedicated Buyers(purchasing group) for particular product group.
What is the possibility of evaluating vendors Purch. group wise in SAP.
Best Regards
Krishna

Hi ,
In Standard SAP , Vendor Evaluation is done at the purchase organisation level.All the data required for vendor evaluation is stored in the system acordingly.
In case you want to do vendor evaluation at purchase group level , you can acheive by custom developed program only.
In case , the same vendor is used by more than one purchase group ... There is no system check to control this . But the vendor master is maintained at the purchase organisation level that is why standard SAP is performing Vendor evaulation at the purchase organisation level..
Regards
Mani

Tables for vendor evaluation data

Hai,
    I want to know the tables in which vendor evaluation data is being stored, and I need to get vendor evaluation data through my RFC, can u suggest me the procedure how I need to do it.
                             Thank you
                              Regards
                                Srinivas

Dear,
You ask a whole Vendor evaluation concept you need to read the help and do customizing depend on the requirement, then you evaluate the vendor using ME61 or ME6G.Almost all of your question need customizing setup first
below is the guide book :
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf

Confirmation date in vendor evaluation

Hi Gurus,
Can you please let me know the settings to be maintained to get a score for the sub criteria Adherence to confirmation date during vendor evaluations.
I've already maintained the purchasing org config settings like weighting and point scores for the automatic criteria.
But when I run a vendor evaluation there is no score coming out for the sub-criteria Adherence to confirmation date.
I'm using the confirmation control key One day acknowledge and confirmation category AB (Order acknowledge). Please let me know if anything is missing out
Regards,
Ashwin.

Ashwin
Our company has the same issue, did you find a solution to this problem?
Thanks
Brad

Vendor evaluation - Confirmation Date

Dear all,
am trying to run vendor evaluation for - confirmation date..
i have create a new confirmation spro - MM -purchasing - confirmations - define external conf , setup conf control
i have included this confirmation in the PO ..delivery date in po item line is 23.06.2014.. delivery date in conf in item details 22.06.2014 GR date is 23.06
when i run vend evaluation, 4 Adher. to Conf. Date is coming zero ---
can you pls advise what could be the reason... is my understanding to this Subcriterion is correct

Hi,
As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

Vendor Evaluation - Statistical Delivery Date

Hi,
The statistical delivery date is an important field during the calculation of the on-time delivery score. (see note 310666)
After implementing a new support package this field wasn't filled up automatically anymore. Fortunately note 1039344 and 1164767 helped overcome this.
But ... in the meantime purchase orders were created and received without a statistical delivery date.
Which date / or what does sap do when calculating on-time delivery score if there is no statistical delivery date ? Does it take the "delivery date" into account ?
with regards

Use this link http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Or find on the SAP help Vendor evaluation white Paper its there.
Edited by: Prashant Prasad on Jul 31, 2009 12:01 PM

Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date

Hi,
I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
Thanks & Regards,
Charudatta

Hi,
Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.

Vendor evaluation data

Hi,
Once a vendor evaluation is carried out, the results will be stored in the tables ELBK, ELBP & ELBM. If one more evaluation is done for the same vendor the system will rewrite the data with the new evaluation data. Can you let me know if I can get the old evaluation data from somewhere.

Once you do all the config than you have to use ME61 than use ME6H transaction.

FM creation for vendor evaluation data

Hai,
    In my function module I need to get vendor evaluation data. To do this from where I can get the details, r there any tables for this, could u suggest something for this, actually I'm new for this MM. Eventhough if there r any tables, before writing FM r there any settings to be done for this.
            I know in ME61 we can get these details, but to write RFC how to proceed.
                                   Thank you
                                 Regards
                                  Srinivas

hi
check
ELBK, ELBN, ELBP u2013 Vendor Evaluation Related Data
ELBM ( Vendor Evaluation: Material-Related Item)
S013
regards
kunal

Automatic Evaluation Data (Vendor Evaluation)

Hi Experts,
We have defined vendor evaluation in such a way. Price, Quality & Delivery - Automatic Evaluation and Service - Manually Entered. When we do Automatic evaluation thru T-Code ME61, Score of price, quality and delivery appears in the system. How can we see the backend data from which these scores derives. So that we can explain user, that the scores have come due to following data / calculation done by system in background.
Can anybody help me. Full points to helping answers.
Regards
GR

Hi GR,
In Help documentation you have the details how each score is getting calculated. We can use this documentation to explain to the client. Also you can take the help of OSS notes.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Regarding to know how the system arrived at that score, is very difficult as it calculates the score by taking all the trasactions happend for that period. And no where in the system it shows how it calculated per transaction-wise.
But if you are so determined, note down the previous score for the vendor, then do one transaction ( PO and GR). Manually Claculate the for one perticular criteria score as defined in the Help documentation. Then run the evaluation and cross check your manually calculated score to the new score.
Hope this helps you in answering your query,
With Regards,
Krishna

Vendor Evaluation data in tables ELBM and ELBP

Hello,
Please can someone provide some direction for this issue we have with MM Vendor Evaluation in ECC5.0.
Basically, I have set up SAP standard Vend Evaluation config for our companies Purchase Orgs in SPRO, however, tables ELBM, and ELBP are not storing any values. The config that I have maintained includes:
-     Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J : set to equal weightings
-     Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G: left as standard
-     Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M: left as standard
-     Define Purchasing Organization data: left as standard but no Subcriterion maintained. Weightings set as equal weightings. Points scores also left as standard/
Any ideas?
Thank you.
Dave
FL,USA.

Once you do all the config than you have to use ME61 than use ME6H transaction.

Vendor Evaluation Standardizing Delivery Date Variance

Hi,
We are determining what the settings should be for On-Time Delivery and Quantity Reliability under Vendor Evaluation. I understand how the formual works when it determines the scores for these. Can someone tell me from a business process perspective what Standardizing Delivery Date Variance relates to?
Ours has been set to 100 which is 100 days with the scores set as:
Percentage
Score
0
100
10
90
20
95
100
80
200
60
300
40.......
When we pick 100 days, is that supposed to be an average of how many days late goods receipts are? Or is there another way to look at it?
Thanks
Beverly

Have you really read the documentation and the F1 field help, or any of our blogs, documents and wikis here in SCN?
The table that you presented above is far a way from reality. a percentage can go from blank to 99.9 and your from -99.9 to blank
this is to cover both situations early deliveries and late deliveries
the Standard Delivery Date Variance means the it is the maximum number of days a vendor can be late or early to the wanted delivery date, if this value is reached, then he just missed the point in the sense of the word. he does not get any single point for his performance.
You have to ask your business how much days variance they accept before they cancel the order, or at least looking for a new vendor with the next order.
From our point of view everything beyond a week is not at all acceptable and results in a total miss
and in this case you do not need many percentages either in a 5 working day week each day corresponds to 20%

Vendor Evaluation Delivery Subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date

Hi experts,
I have Vendor Evaluation configured for Delivery subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date. These are set to scoring method 6 and B respectively. In the Purchasing Org Data, for subcriteria Delivery, I have equal weighting set for all 4 subcriteria (on-time del, quantity reliability, shipping instr, and adher to conf date). When I run the vendor evaluation in ME61, and look at the evaluation of subcriteria, I see a score and weight for on-time delivery, and quantity reliablity. But for shipping instructions and adher to Conf Date, there is no score and the weight is 0.0. Does anyone know why there is no weight shown? I know I have to maintain the scores for shipping instr and adher to conf date but I should see weight as 25% since I set these 4 subcriteria to equal weighting. Can anyone help? Thanks!
Regards,
Julie

Hi,
As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

Tracing Vendor Evaluation Data

Hi friends,
I want to trace detail of Vendor Evaluation results. For example for a one vendor evaluation we used 5 different control party result. I would like to see this 5 value. Is it poosible? How?
Thanks, have a nice day

Thank you for your reply. Of course checked ME65. For example.
Vendor valuated for 120 days. Purchased raw material with 4 different order. Created 6 different control party. Now when I check the evaluation report at ME65.
X Vendor
Purchasing score %100
Quality score %75
@detail.
Quality score %75. Which control parties created for this score? How can I understand??

Delivary date parameter in vendor evaluation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for