Deliveries not getting generated through VL10H

Hi All,
I've a scenario where users are trying to create deliveries against Sales Order through VL10H but it displays an error log "Delivery group 005 is not complete (delivery group will be deleted)". But while using VL04 no erros are there. This is happening against a particular customer. I tried but not able to find any clue.
Require your expert guidance regarding this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Girish

hi Arun,
have you run RFFOAVIS autonomous (not within F110) ?
Andreas

Similar Messages

  • Automatic Mail not getting generated through background job

    Hi Experts,
    We have set up a job variant with spool recipients. We are getting the automatic mail if the job is getting finished successfully. But we are not getting the automatic mail if the job is in cancelled status. Earlier we used to get the mail even if the job is in cancelled status. We are not sure if there is any setting which would restrict the automatic mail based on the job status.
    Appreciate your help in this regard.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ranjani.

    Hi,
    Just for a work around, try checking the SAP user inbox for the user who has scheduled the background job.
    I don't there  is any seperate configuration in Spool List Recipient for the canceled jobs. We need to confirm that the email ids provided in the Spool List recipient are correct and the background job creates a spool request even if it is canceled.
    Also if possible try deleting the existing background job and create a new background job with the same parameters and valid email id's maintained in the Spool List recipient.
    OR
    Without deleting the existing background job, parallely create a new background job with the same parameters and valid email id's maintained in the Spool List recipient. If it works then delete the old background job.
    Thanks
    Harish

  • Schedule lines are not getting generated through MRP

    Hello Experts,
    While running MRP, we observed that the system is creating PR instead of schedule lines, although all the necessary prerequistes to generate schedule lines through MRP are maintained. For e.g.
    1. MRP Schedule line relevant indicator '2' is maintained in the Source List.
    2. Sch. Agreement dates and Source List validity dates are same.etc...
    Further after some analysis, we observed that if we change the source list validity from date to some back date then system is creating correct schedule lines.
    Example: Material M1; Planned delivery time 7 days; GR processing time 5 days; MRP Type PD; Lot Size WB;
    SA validity dates - 07.09.2011 to 31.12.2011
    Source List validity dates - 07.09.2011 to 31.12.2011
    If MRP run on 12.09.2011 and source list dates are retain same as mentioned above, system creates the PR.
    If MRP run on 12.09.2011 and source list dates changes to 05.09.2011 to 31.12.2011, system creates the schedule lines.
    Could you please let us know, why the system behave like this?

    Dear,
    Welcome to SDN,
    In transaction OMDT you have to enable the indicator create schedule lines
    In MD02 MRP control Prameter here select the Delivery schedules -3- Schedule line. Processing Key as NETCH and Planning Mode - 3 delted and recreated.
    Maintain source list ME01, in that put MRP indicator as '2' i.e. schedule lines via MRP.Put your agreement no in that.
    If u run MRP properly u will get schedule lines automatically in ME38.
    Make the schedule agreement, make it source relevent in the source list make is FIX and MRP indicator as 3.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Report not get generate through URL on Development machine

    Hi
    I have got development environment on machine where only weblogic admin is there [ No Forms/Report Services ]. Can I run run report on that machine through URL.
    I am using weblogic with Forms 11g [ 11.1.2.1.0 ]
    Thanks
    Vishal

    So, you are using 11g-Release2 with a "Development" installation type.  The part I don't understand is why you said you are using Forms 11, but then mention running a report through a URL.  Are you trying to call a report from a Forms application?  If not and you are simply trying to call a report from a URL directly in a browser, you may want to post your "Reports" question in the Reports forum, which is here:
    https://forums.oracle.com/community/developer/english/development_tools/application_development_in_pl_sql/reports
    Generally speaking, I see no reason why you wouldn't be able to run a report from a URL or from Forms.  Both should work.  Have you read the documentation?
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24269_01/doc.11120/e24479/pbr_run001.htm

  • Display name not getting generated When creating user thorugh GTC

    We are using GTC flat file as a trusted source. We see that display name not getting generated. And same thing happening when creating a new GTC mapping.
    previously when we ran with few test user got created with display name through GTC flat file , Suddenly we see this issue display name not getting generated through flat file recon.
    Manually user creation has no issues.
    Please let me know if you have any idea about this issue.

    Don't use GTC... GTC is inflexible and buggy technology... Nothing guaranteed... Rather create your own custom trusted recon code...
    For more details
    26 Known Issues of Generic Technology Connectors
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E10391_01/doc.910/e10360/issues.htm

  • Spool not getting generated in OO ALV report

    Hi,
    I developed a report in which we are giving output in same selection screen through OO ALV.
    But,when we are scheduling that report in background,spool is not getting generated.
    Waiting for your reply.
    BR,
    Praveen

    Hi Aparna,
    I tried NEW-PAGE PRINT ON.
    I am pasting source code extract below:
       IMPORT DATA = ME->IT_FINAL2 FROM MEMORY ID SY-CPROG.
        FREE MEMORY ID SY-CPROG.
        CHECK ME->IT_FINAL2 IS NOT INITIAL.
        CHECK LO_DOCK IS INITIAL.
        CREATE OBJECT LO_DOCK
          EXPORTING
            REPID = SY-REPID
            DYNNR = SY-DYNNR
            RATIO = 70
            SIDE  = CL_GUI_DOCKING_CONTAINER=>DOCK_AT_BOTTOM
            NAME  = 'DOCK_CONT'.
        IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
          MESSAGE 'Error in Docking Control' TYPE 'S'.
        ENDIF.
        IF LO_ALV IS INITIAL.
          TRY.
              LO_CONT ?= LO_DOCK.
              CALL METHOD CL_SALV_TABLE=>FACTORY
                EXPORTING
                  LIST_DISPLAY   = IF_SALV_C_BOOL_SAP=>FALSE
                  R_CONTAINER    = LO_CONT
                  CONTAINER_NAME = 'DOCK_CONT'
                IMPORTING
                  R_SALV_TABLE   = LO_ALV
                CHANGING
                  T_TABLE        = ME->IT_FINAL2.
            CATCH CX_SALV_MSG.
          ENDTRY.
      CLEAR LR_COLUMN.
          TRY.
              LR_COLUMNS = LO_ALV->GET_COLUMNS( ).
              LR_COLUMN = LR_COLUMNS->GET_COLUMN( 'KSCHL' ).
              LR_COLUMN->SET_LONG_TEXT( 'Cond.Type' ).
    CATCH CX_SALV_NOT_FOUND.
          ENDTRY.
    NEW-PAGE PRINT ON.
            LO_ALV->DISPLAY( ).
            NEW-PAGE PRINT OFF.
    I am not getting spool list while executing it in background.
    BR,
    Praveen

  • TDS reversal entry is not getting generated at time of F-54

    Dear All,
    I have made down payment request  through F-47  transaction code  and down  payment made by Transaction code u2013F110 (instead of F-48)   and TDS is deducted at this point. There after I made invoice through MIRO / F-43 in which TDS is again deducted for whole invoice amount. I have cleared down payment through T.code F-54. But at this time TDS reversal entry is not getting generated and only customer account is credited and debited.
    So in short TDS is getting deducted at time down payment and at time of Invoice for their respective full value.
    Note: For TDS type on payment I have selected u201CCentral Invoice PROPu201D and we are not using business place and section code. Please help me.
    Appreciate all expertsu2019 help ASAP.
    Thanks ,
    Manas kumar

    Hai Manas,
    If ur not using business place how can u get remitance chalana thats why first u can configure the business plance. I think ur already posted some entries its correct? In this case u will run this t.code business place update the previous entries i.e.,  J1INPP  this is very useful to u
    Regards
    Madhu I

  • Task activities not getting generated properly in BPEL

    I am using the Jdev 11g TP3 (from OTN). Installation went through fine. However I observed a interesting issue with HumanTask/BPEL and I was wondering if someone faced similar such problems before, if so, how to rectify the issue. Here is the description of the issue:
    1. Created a Empty SOA composite project
    2. Dragged and dropped BPEL Process in the component palette. Designed a Asynchronous process.
    3. Dragged and dropped a HumanTask. Did not expose as an composite. Designed a single approver workflow. In the project schema, choose the schema from BPEL input.
    4. Wired BPEL to HumanTAsk
    5. In the BPEL flow, I dragged the HumanTask to the flow. Everything appears to be correct. I clicked on "Ok" after associating with BPEL variable.
    Now when I examine the BPEL flow, a scope before the BPEL switch is empty. There are no BPEL activities generated. This is a very simple case of BPEL and HumanTask and I am not sure as to why the tasks not getting generated properly in BPEL flow.
    Has anyone experienced this issue or any ideas as to why this could happen?

    After going through the exercise several times, I finally found out the reason as to why the BPEL activities are not getting generated. In the Human task form for the title, since it is a fixed string in my case I put something like the one given below:
    Title : "APPROVE ORDER"
    When you have fixed string within double quotes it does not generate BPEL activities correctly. You can try and u will see the problem.
    My real question is should not throw proper error message when you try to drag and drop the HumanTask to BPEL flow.

  • Wlproxy.log not getting generated

    Hi
    I am trying to proxy the weblogic requests through IIS 7.5, it is working. but wlproxy logs are not getting generated. Please fnd below my iisproxy.init file contents.
    Could any one tell me if I am missing any thing.
    Steps followed.
    1. created website in IIS
    2. added isapi filter by giving the iisforward.dll path, name given is wlforward
    3. added handler mappings by giving *.wlforward as the path and giving iisproxy.dll path
    4. added the file iisproxy.ini file
    iisproxy.ini contents
    WebLogicHost=xx.xx.xx.xx
    WebLogicPort=7002
    WLForwardPath=/
    DefaultFileName=/TEST/index.jsp
    WLproxySSL=ON
    SecureProxy=OFF
    RequireSSLHostMatch=false
    Debug=ALL
    DebugConfigInfo=ON
    WLTempDir=D:/Temp
    Regards
    PPK

    It is working. It is something to do with admin rights on that file clreation. I got full admin access. now it works.

  • Planned order not getting generated for FG

    Dear Experts,
    Planned orders not getting generated for the Finished Goods - X which is having MRP Type M0 - MPS fixing type strategy group 20 which is copied fron another FG - Y , its a new product and production plan has been updated through MC88 - Rough cut planning but the planned orders are not getting generated.
    And for the material valid production version exists with selection method 3 and individullcollective as 1.
    Please let me know what might be the possibalities and what all the key fields i need to check.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sampath
    Edited by: sampath s on Jul 13, 2011 11:31 AM

    Dear,
    In general MPS is run for High value items ( if you use like Gold , Platimum or A class items. ).
    Always only single level is used for Explosion and planning. then only you can analyse the requirements at each stage before procurement.
    Otherwise if you run MPS to multi level, Bottom most high value will be procured without any notice to authorities. Even you may cancel the process in mid way. At that time what will happen to the procured high value material.
    So for that purpose only single item single level MPS concept is evolved.
    Fo that you run MPS at single level so that only for the first level MPS will be carried out.
    Check and revert back.\
    Regards,
    Alok Tiwari

  • Reports not getting generated

    Dear All,
    I know this is a repeat query but im unable to find information from the blogpost http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-41109.
    I have earlier configured the WWI setup in a linux server. Now I am testing it on a windows server. I have made all the configurations in word and for generation server. The issue is, the report is not getting generated in report management screen and is in status Generation possible always.
    When i check the wwi monitor, the doc type SBR is getting released but not getting completed. Please see the screenshot. CGSADM is working fine, RFC is working fine. I tried creating documents in CV01N and they are getting created. The DCOM settings are also good and activated the permissions there too. The DMS settings are set as per the SAP notes. However The job i scheduled is in status Finished for document generation. But when I try to generate the report, the report is created using a variant and the status of the report is in generation possible always. I checked the variant of the report and the validity is in REG_WORLD. I understand that there is some issue in the scheduled job.
    I have scheduled only one job for Document Generation as follows.
    a)Enter the job name - DOC GENERATION and choose a job class - A.
    d) Choose Start condition and in the dialog box, choose After event.
    e) Enter SAP_SYSTEM_START in the event field.
    f) Activate Periodic job - HOURLY
    g) Choose Check and save your entries.
    h) Choose Step and choose ABAP program in the dialog box that appears.
    i) Enter RC1WWIDS as the ABAP program name.
    j) Choose Check and save your entries.
    k) Before you leave the Define Background Job screen, you must save your entries once more.
    Result: The job is started whenever the SAP system is started.
    aFTER REPEATED ATTEMPTS, THE RESULT IS THE SAME AND NO CHANGE IN STATUS OF THE REPORT.
    Kindly suggest what step am i missing . I have been through all the blogs in SCN. My old blogs are however missing and hence I am not able to access them.
    I am using SAP GUI 7.30, ECC6 and EHP 5.
    Regards
    Dhinesh

    Dear Dhinesh
    Please help me to understand your system landscape.
    a.) Did you have had a SAP EHS up and running together with a "linux server" based WWI version
    and
    b.) now you are switching the same SAP system to a "windows server" based version?
    I am not sure about your screenshots. But you seem to have more than one gen server attached to the same system; did you updated as well WWI?
    So no adaption of general SAP set up (like DMS etc.)?
    Therefore any job scheduled (before afterwards) is done using a SAP account having the necessary access rights?
    Can you please check this:
    1.) create several sessions; one with WWi monitor and one with CG02; try to generate a different report for the same spec id (e.g. not MSDSUS in EN, but MSDS/FR) and check progress in WWI monitor as well as CG50
    2.) select in CG50 the report in status "generation possible"; mark it and try to "go" on ; check access rights afterwards (su53)
    I hate this status "generation possible". I believe you need to use "debug replace" to remove that entry; I can not remember any more but that was the only option to get "rid" of this entry
    Please read WWI cookbook, There is a set up possible in such a way that any action on WWI server is "logged"; may be try to analyze the log file to get idea why there is no progress regarding the generation
    PS: the problem you have detected is not related to the "validity area". It is a matter of communication issue between SAP and WWI server and the WWI process can not be finalized.
    But you are not alone with your problem (e.g. check:
    http://www.benxbrain.com/en/sap/program/RC1WWIDS-Generation-possible-status-not-changing-thread-1-1547841.htm)
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3311944
    http://www.consolut.com/en/s/sap-ides-access/d/s/doc/H-ESEWSRSTAT
    https://scn.sap.com/thread/1575223
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-dev/ehs-wwi-processing-272462
    Check as well your own thread: http://scn.sap.com/thread/3304285
    C.B.
    PS: may be check: http://www.stechno.net/sap-notes.html?view=sapnote&id=1094307
    as well as:
    http://www.stechno.net/sap-notes.html?view=sapnote&id=580586
    PPS I: logging feature of WWI is described here: Note 778684
    PPS II: may be check: http://www.stechno.net/sap-notes.html?view=sapnote&id=1094307
    PPS II: may be check as well: http://scn.sap.com/thread/3344033
    and http://scn.sap.com/thread/1381004

  • FI Doc not getting generated at the time of Asset GRN

    Hi,
    We have created Asset Purchase Order.
    At the time of GRN, FI Doc is not getting generated.
    What changes need to be required from MM side (in OBYC)
    Regards,

    HI PK,
    whether your PO Item have Single Account Assignment or it is Multiple Account assignment.
    Check Distribution in Accoun Assignment Tab at PO item level.
    If it is Single account Assignment, then Accounting Document will be generated at GR where if it is Distributed then, no Accounting Document will be generated.
    In your case, Probably it would be distributed. and as a result of this your PO Item is marked as 'GR non valuated'.
    Check its Delivery Tab. If it is the case, then need not worry as it is std practise. system will treated it as multiple account assignment and its valuation will only be carried out Invoice Verification level.
    Later on check the Material document also.
    Pls Note:
    If flag 'GR non-valuated' is set in the purchase order, the valuation is only executed through the invoice verification. This flag must be set if the purchase order has multiple account assignment.
    A valuated goods receipt for a purchase order with account assignment generates a posting line for the consumption account 'Account-assigned purchase order' (KBS) and for the GR/IR clearing account WRX.
    hope it address your issue.
    Regards,
    S Anand

  • Credit note is not getting generate and there is no error log

    Hi,
    Could you please help with the following scenario.
    I have created a credit memo with reference to a billing document. Then  when I try and create a credit note for this credit memo, it does not get generated and the following message apprears 'No billing documents were generated'
    Processing status for this is - 'Not Processed'
    and there are no messages in the error log as well.
    Could you please advise as to what the missing configuration might be? As i can't seem to find what is causing the problem
    Your advise is much appreciate.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Amalie

    Kindly create a Credit Memo Request wrt to Billing Document by maintaining in the Copying Control through VTAF and then create a Credit Memo wrt Credit Memo request through VTFA.
    Then go to VOFA with your Billing Type and maintain Account Determination Procedure.
    it does not get generated and the following message apprears 'No billing documents were generated'
    Do you able to get the Number while saving the Credit Memo or not able to save it .
    Kindly check the configuration of Account ket in VKOA also .
    Best Regards,
    Ankur

  • CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE IDOC not getting generated for BUS_TRANS_MSG BDOC

    Hello Experts,
    In our project, we have a requirement to send custom fields in the BUS_TRANS_MSG to external system through XIF. The model of BDOC BUS_TRANS_MSG triggering IDOC CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 perfectly worked in the development system. We wanted to try the custom field extension in the Sandbox. So as per OSS note 916093, we have extended E101_CRMXIF_CUSTOMER_H segments with custom fields and tried generating the interfaces in BDFG transaction. While generation with IDOC CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M we got an error message "Incompatible change to complex data type
    type E101CRMXIF_ISU_PRA1_X". So went about creating a custom IDOC ZZ_CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 for message CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE. Even for this config, the IDOC is not getting generated for the BDOCs. Lastly, configured the IDOC ZZ_CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M02 to a custom function module ZZ_BDFG_IDOC_TEST_FM. The FM got generated and activated, even then the IDOC is not generated for the BDOC.
    SMOEAC config in Sandbox looks the same as the Development system. We do not the reason why IDOC is not getting generated and also the reason for error in BDFG while generating the interfaces after adding custom fields to CUSTOMER_H segment.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Partha

    Hi Partha,
    Kindly check the following thread.
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/406efa7e-388a-2910-f9b8-81913b0ca57f?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
    XIF adapter
    Hope it answers your Query
    Regards,
    Srikanth.Naga

  • STPPOD.DELVRY03 idoc not getting generated

    Dear Experts,
    I have done the following settings for STPPOD.DELVRY03 but still idoc is not getting generated when i am posting goods reciept using VL32N
    1) For Confirmation control key selected A-Always POD Relevant
    2) For Item category ELN POD Relevant X and POD Automatic
      SAP->Customizing Implementation Guide -> LogisticsExecution ->Shipping
    ->Deliveries ->Proof of Delivery ->Set POD-Relevance Depending on
    Delivery Item Category
      3) In Vendor Master the field "POD-Relevant" is assigned the value "A".
       4) In NACE settings
              Application:E1
              condition records & output type:OPOD
              Delivery type:EL
              Function:LS
      4) In pratner profile
                  Partner Type-->LS
                  Partner Role -->  blank)
                   Message Type-->STPPOD
                   Basic Type ->DELVRY03
                  and under message control
                  Application->E1
                  Message Type
                  Process code-->OPOD
    Please suggest me if I am missing out on someting.
    Thanks
    Gaurav Gupta

    Hi Gaurav,
    Typically for STPPOD Idocs, the NACE and WE20 Settings are maintained at Vendor Level. Try changing your settings and see if it works.
    Refer this link for further details : Re: STPPOD triggered sending wrong material from SAP to SNC
    Thanks,
    Bharath

Maybe you are looking for