Delivery cost during import

Hi friends..
        during import the delivery cost given in the po is different from the delivery cost at the time of miro...
i mean there is some slight variation.
               i came to know that this was because the decimal place.... in po only two numerics are allowed after decimal,
if the exchange rate has more than two decimals the delivery cost is converted into foreign currency only considering two decimal place.
             can anyone tell me, how can i make the po delivery costs condition types to allow more than 2 decimal places..
hope my querry is clear...

Hi,
For individual condition is not possible to increase the decimal places. Moreover dont try to increa the decimal place in the sytem as it is affected to your old data also.
For your case you can roundoff the value for freight condion. For this go to m/06 and make your condition as A in Rounding rule under the contrl tab under control data 1 tab.
regards

Similar Messages

Tax code error while posting Planned delivery costs in Import Scenario

Hi!!!!!
I am getting on error while posting Planned delivery costs in MIRO for Import Purchase Order with zero value tax code v0. The error is
"Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZAXINN"
For Import I defined a pricing procedure which contains all condition types for CVD, Ecess, SEcess, Additional Customs Duty and Others.
While making Import PO im putting V0 tax code. I assigned the Tax Codes to the Company code.
Please let me know what config is missing.
Regards,
Durga

Is you ZAXINN assigned to the country India
and is your taxcode (created in FTXP) created for country India?
kr
hakan

Planned delivery cost in Import of Assets Materail

Hi,
I have a scenario, where we are purchasing (Import) Assets material from abroad. for this we have created Import PO with account assignment A. assigned the planned delivery cost in Condition Viz. Sea freight, Custom Duty, CHA charges and individual vendor also assigned at condition level.
We have posted the MIRO for Custome Duty and Done the GR. Excise Invoice also Captured and posted. While posting the invoice of other Delivery cost after GR system is not showing any value in MIRO line item.
Where as in normal inport cycle Value in Planned delivery cost IV (after GR) is appearing itself.
Please guide how to Post Delievry cost IV in above scenario. we donot want to enter any amount manual in MIRO line item.
Thanks & Regards,
Ranjan Kumar

Hi Ranjan,
The idea with MIRO is to enter the vendor invoice that you got on paper, i.e. the gross amount, the tax amount(s) and the net item amounts - all from the vendor invoice. For this reason the defaulted amounts shouldn't be necessary.
If your business case is different, then there's a workaround. MIRO only suggests amounts if two cases:
- PO doesn't have provision for GR ("GR" flag on the tab "Delivery") or
- PO does have provision for GR and the received qty up to day is higher than the total invoiced qty up to day.
I have however used a user exit to make MIRO think the GR flag in the PO is not set. The user exit is the enhancement point MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE_01 of the enh. spot ES_SAPLMRMC located right in the beginning of the function MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE. The function module receives the GR flag from the PO in the parameter I_MRM_PROP-WEPOS. Let your enhancement reset the flag and make MIRO believe the GR flag in the PO is not set. Then it will propose the PO qty and amount.
However, let me underline again - the idea with MIRO is that you should type in the invoice that you hold your hand.
BR
Raf

Distribution of unplanned delivery costs during delivery cost LIV

Hi all,
This clarification is regarding delivery cost LIV - where difference between:
- the amount invoiced by the freight vendor
and
- the amount accrued based on PO
is treated as unplanned delivery cost and is intended to be distributed amongst the line items of the accrued planned delivery cost.
Customizing for the company code - Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted - is set as "Distribute among invoice items".
When we try to post an LIV in regard to the aforesaid scenario [Tax code is with 0% tax], the system returns the following error message:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Balance is not equal to zero: 58.42 EUR
    Message no. M8186
Diagnosis
    You cannot post the document as the balance is 58.42 EUR.
Procedure
    Check the gross invoice amount, the tax amount, the amounts in the items
    selected and any unplanned delivery costs in the document header. The
    items selected on the item list may not be the same as those in the
    invoice.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also, went through the OSS note 129066 which mentions that Unplanned delivery costs cannot be distributed to the planned delivery costs as of SAP release 4.6C.
Our system is SAP 4.7 and hence we are unable to understand the reason for this error..
Is there any enhancement relevant in this regard?
Can anyone please throw some light on this.
Best Regards,
Bhargav

Thank you for contacting SAP Global Support Center.
It seems you're posting the planned and unplanned delivery cost
simultaneously.
The planned delivery cost and unplanned delivery cost cannot be invoicedtogether when only freight cost is being invoiced.
Unplanned delivery cost and planned delivery cost can be invoiced
together only when you invoice both goods and freight cost.
This is the standard design of the system. Even in customizing for
unplanned delivery cost, the system behavior is designed such a way thatit can be invoiced along with goods only. Both options which we have
given behave similarly except for the posting to account.
Therefore, your system behavior is as per standard design and there
is no error in your system. For this functionality there are no other
workarounds too.
Additionally, Please consider if the workaround below is working.
In order to post unplanned delivery costs with planned delivery costs
the customizing has to be set so that the unplanned delivery costs are
posted to a seperate G/L account rather than distributed amongs line
items.
SPRO
>>Materials Management
>>Logistics Invoice Verification
>>Incoming Invoice
>>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
"2" Different G/L line
May I ask you to review note 129066. The the validity is from 4.0 to
4.6 C but it is valid for your release also.

Planned Delivery Costs in IMPORT PO

Hi,
What planned delivery costs are posted to GL accounts and material accounts.
I want to post Clearing & Forwarding and Demurrage charges to material accounts.How it can be done.
Regards

Solved

Difference in PO and GR delivery costs for Import PO

Hi,
Good Morning. I have created Imported PO. At item level, i have assigned INR 100 as CHA charges. Now it has been converted to 2.12USD. Then while doing the GR, in accounting document, it is updating CHA charges as 99.72. Then what about remaining INR0.28? This is happening because, while converting from INR to USD, system is considering first 2 places after decimal point.So Please help us to resolve the issue.
Thanks and Regards,

Hi
I dont think there is any solution .... system behaves as it is designed ...
your PO is in foreign curency .. u enter CHA in INR ... It gets converted to USD ... Then again at GR it gets converted to INR .... rounding off is happening ..... system makes lotsa calculations ... u just cant avoid it ,,... and moreever it is not a major impact .... plus u can always correct everything in MIRO
And in MIRO u are supposed to correct the amounts ... IV or bill booking by accounts dept is meant to clear exact bills ..in any business organisation

VI01 as delivery costs in MIGO

Hi all,
We have to change de Automatic PO generated in Shipment costs for Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt.
We have applied de SAP Note 427944.
. M/06
Condition type: 'B' delivery costs (T685A-KNTYP field)
Accrual: 'X' (T685A-KRUEK field)
Copy shp.costs: 'X' (T685A-BNKTK field)
. Entries in the calculation schema: (IMG -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price- Determination Process -> Define Calculation Schema)
In the calculation schema, an
1. Account key (T683S-KVSL1 field)
2. Account key - accruals/provisions (Field T683S-KVSL2)
must be specified for the corresponding condition type (similar to the FRB1 condition type in schema RM0000). Note that this condition is always marked as 'statistical' in the condition screen of the purchase order regardless of the settings in the price schema because it is an accrual.
. Purchase order: The condition type should not be valuated in the purchase order item, that is, the condition value is 0.
. Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected
shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     C transferred
. In T_56 the
u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST is D Release shipment cost item
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status are only
Calculated      C Fully calculated     but in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them the status are
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     A Not transferred   and in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
The process is :
ME21N
VL31N
VT02N (automatically)
VI01 (no PO automatically as before)
MIGO material GR for the inbound delivery of VL31N AND accounting of the delivery costs. THE ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS is missing why??
Someone can help?
Cheers
marta

Hi,
Just to clarify my questions. In the note 427944 explain that
1 . Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
*It means that the 3 status must be : Calculated C Fully calculated + Assigned C Account assignment fully completed + Transferred C transferred ?*
Other thing:
2 *. In T_56 the u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST must be D Release shipment cost item?*
3. In T_56 If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status showed in VI01 are only Calculated C Fully calculated b
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them in VI01 the status are Calculated C Fully calculated /Assigned C Account assignment fully completed / Transferred A Not transferred. *Why I can not do the transfer?*
as is Transferred A Not transferred them in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS.
Could you help me with one of these three questions?
Thank you very much,
marta

Planned delivery cost report

Dear Experts ,
Is there any report showa planned delivery cost per P.O in SAP R/3 ???
Rrgards

I do not think so that there are planned edelivery costs and actual delivery costs in sap.the frieght entered in PO termed to be planned and will get captured in MIGO with FRIR.During LIV you may enter the actual delivery cost sent by vendor and which also posted to the GL to balance the FR posted during the MIGO and if there exists a diff in GR,IR you may need to for MR11.
there is one term unplanned delivery cost during MIRO .
There is no std report for capturing delivery costs per PO. Rather you may need use table for vonditions FRC1 may be KONP.
You can plan to delvelop a report which takes the posted frieght during MIGO and MIRO through GLs and compare for planned and actual posting of delivery costs.
Regards,

Changing delivery costs after GR

The problem is w.r.t. import procurement.
Components like Custom Duty, Ecess on Customs etc are added as Delivery Costs in Import POs.
Now these components get inventorised at the time of GR.
Once the GR is done, we are not able to change these components.
Actually we are facing problem of incorrect material valuation for imported materials. We are planning to change these components in PO after GR , then do revaluation using MRNB.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks.

I feel I was not able to communicate my problem correctly.
The component custom duty is non-cenvatable. i.e., This is treated as delivery cost. Now this definately has to inventorise.
System is doing this correctly. No problem with this.
The problem is with the value. Most of the times the users are entering wrong value in PO. They do GR.
Then they try to change the PO condition. This is not happening.
IF we are able to change the PO conditions after GR. We shall then go to revaluation. This will result in correct inventorisation.
Hope I am clear.

Error during MIGO-Error during maint. of delivery costs in master condition

Hi
We are getting error as below during MIGO against a PO with doc type NB:
"Error during maint. of delivery costs in master conditions, Delivery cost conditions in different validity periods not identical"
What might be cause??
Thanks
Maruthi

Check the delivery conditions in condition tab of PO.
Try to check if there are any delivery condition records mainatined.
I think the problem is mostly due to overlapping validity period. Try to change the validity period for the same.

Import purchase - problem with delivery costs

Hi guys,
In case of import purchase, we are normally giving 3 to 4 types of delivery costs (like freight,agency charges etc). If there is no transaction done against the PO, we are able to either change or add new delivery cost to the Purchase Order. But if we try to make changes or add one more condition type (related to delivery cost), after preparing inbound delivery/goods receipt against the PO, it is not allowing. Do we need to make any configuratin changes for this to happen.
Please suggest us the way out for this problem.
Thanks in advance,
Chintu

Hi ,
No , you won't be able to make any changes specially to the said condition .
Any adjustment u can done in MIRO document .
Thanks
Dipak

Import PO error - You cannot enter new delivery costs

Hi Guru's,
I hv created import PO with 10 qty and done the custom MIRO, later i cancelled the custom MIRO.
Now i am trying to add or Delete any condition in PO, System is giving below error.
You cannot enter new delivery costs
can anyone suggest.
Regards
Rahul

Hi,
early explains in OSS note 549408:
After an occurred invoice receipt the change of delivery costs is not allowed in the purchase, either, as information for the correct process are no longer available and the postings can no longer or not without errors be carried out, particularly after the deletion of posted delivery costs for subsequent cancellations or invoices.
SAP has identified that the thing you want is a source of inconsistencies, hence SAP has fixed their programs to not allow this situation.
Thanks & Regards
Lokesh

Delivery Cost to be posted in full during the first GR itself

Hi
I have a requirement where in i need to create a new condition type "Delivery Cost" in the purchasing pricing procedure. This should post the fixed delivery cost as given in the PO completely during the first GR itself, irrespective of the partial GR's done.
Will try to explain it with an example -
Say a PO is created for 100 qtys and this has a delivery cost of 100 GBP.
I do a GR for 55 qty, here the delivery cost should be posted as 100GBP only not 55GBP.
Can this be handled in the standard Pricing procedure? if yes what setting needs to be done.
If this cannot be handled in the standard pricing procedure how to achieve this,
Please advise.
Thanks
Regards

hi,
this is acheived by std configuration .
use the freight condition FRB1 (fixed amount) with A/C key ( FRE ) and Acuural ( FR1 ) in pricing .
if u use it as item condition , for each GR , for that item irrespective qty , it will charge full freight amount.
if u use it as header condition , for each GR , for that PO , freight amount will be charged irrespective of qty & no of items.
regards
vengaladasu
Edited by: vengaladasu on Aug 11, 2008 3:58 PM
Edited by: vengaladasu on Aug 11, 2008 4:23 PM

Unplanned delivery cost to material through G/L account during Invoicing

Hi,
We have a problem of capturing unplanned delivery cost to material
The scenario is as follows
We are not sure of few conditional value's during Purchase Order creation.
We come to know only during Invoice verification,
These conditions might be many, like labor Charges,Unloading Charges etc which should go to material.
Though we can post it to material directly with reference to PO,we will not be knowing the purpose of posting,as the client wants the complete landed cost including these.
And if we post it to a G/L account it does not go to material,Even if we set up UPF key, it still goes to G/L account only.
Is there any way to post to material via G/L Account,as we want to give G/L account as reference to those conditions.
Thanks and Regards
W.Raghuram

hi
there r two options either the cost will distribute to the items or it will come to some different acct
now u can set this
Spro > MM >Logistic Invoice verification > Incoming Invoice > Configure how unplaned delivery costs are posted.
here select appropriate option
if u want it to be loaded on material then select distibute among line items
if u want diff acct then chose 2nd option
if u want diffrent gl acct for diff types of delivery cost then u can directly activate the direct posting to gl acct
Spro > MM >Logistic Invoice verification > Incoming Invoice > Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts
then u will find a G?L acct tab
here u can directly debit a amount to an acct
regards
kunal

Delivery cost not created during GRN of PO using BAPI

I have a customized program which use BAPI - BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create PO, PO was created successully.
then program will use BAPI - BAPI_PO_CHANGE to update condition pricing, which is also executed succesfully. all condition pricing (KONV) updated correctly.
Lastly, the program will use BAPI - BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create GRN and update delivery cost. However in my case, the delivery cost is not update, EKBZ table record is not created, as well as GRN item line table MSEG table is not updated with delivery cost.
Anyone face this type of problem before?What is the possible causes?
Any help and suggestion is greatly appreciated.

Lai,
you should try asking this on ABAP forum thread. You will get a response. May be there is another BAPI u should use or may be you the usage of BAPI is incomplete. Pl confirm with ABAP forum.
Rgds

Delivery cost during import

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for